Download - 2016 BN marking criteria Emily Assign 1 ethics (1)

Transcript
Page 1: 2016 BN marking criteria Emily Assign 1 ethics (1)

HSNS 366 Assignment 1 Part B Marking Criteria-Ethical Case Review

Marking criteriaAchievement

level MarkEthical review

Completion of Smart Sparrow learning module and Conducts a comprehensive review of principles

Discusses relevant ethical principles and Applies principles appropriately to the ethical case

SS 2.5/2.5

8/10

Teamwork Identifies relevant factors and processes for successful

teamwork Discusses strategies that can be used in health contexts

and Relates/recommends strategies for the ethical case 8/10

Content

Clear identification, definition and explanation of central concepts

Evidence of focused reading and research to locate and develop knowledge of key topic areas

Analysis

Logical development and application of ideas to the topic

Review of current and relevant literature to support thoughts and ideas

Thoughtful analysis and discussion integrating information from the evidence-based literature and synthesizing responses to key topic area

8/10

Provisional mark /30DEDUCTIONS are applied for the following:

Inappropriate presentation, grammar, punctuation, spelling and referencing

Minimal or extended word limit (maximum 10% leeway) Poor formatting and/or presentation Failure to check/edit spelling, grammar and punctuation

errors Incorrect/incomplete referencing

Final mark 24/300

Assessed by:

Comments:

Page 2: 2016 BN marking criteria Emily Assign 1 ethics (1)

HSNS 366 Assignment 1 Part B Marking Criteria-Ethical Case Review