2016 BN marking criteria Emily Assign 1 ethics (1)
2
HSNS 366 Assignment 1 Part B Marking Criteria-Ethical Case Review Marking criteria Achievement level Mark Ethical review Completion of Smart Sparrow learning module and Conducts a comprehensive review of principles Discusses relevant ethical principles and Applies principles appropriately to the ethical case SS 2.5/2.5 8/10 Teamwork Identifies relevant factors and processes for successful teamwork Discusses strategies that can be used in health contexts and Relates/recommends strategies for the ethical case 8/10 Content Clear identification, definition and explanation of central concepts Evidence of focused reading and research to locate and develop knowledge of key topic areas Analysis Logical development and application of ideas to the topic Review of current and relevant literature to support thoughts and ideas Thoughtful analysis and discussion integrating information from the evidence-based literature and synthesizing responses to key topic area 8/10 Provisional mark /30 DEDUCTIONS are applied for the following:
-
Upload
emily-bishop -
Category
Documents
-
view
16 -
download
0
Transcript of 2016 BN marking criteria Emily Assign 1 ethics (1)
HSNS 366 Assignment 1 Part B Marking Criteria-Ethical Case Review
Marking criteriaAchievement
level MarkEthical review
Completion of Smart Sparrow learning module and Conducts a comprehensive review of principles
Discusses relevant ethical principles and Applies principles appropriately to the ethical case
SS 2.5/2.5
8/10
Teamwork Identifies relevant factors and processes for successful
teamwork Discusses strategies that can be used in health contexts
and Relates/recommends strategies for the ethical case 8/10
Content
Clear identification, definition and explanation of central concepts
Evidence of focused reading and research to locate and develop knowledge of key topic areas
Analysis
Logical development and application of ideas to the topic
Review of current and relevant literature to support thoughts and ideas
Thoughtful analysis and discussion integrating information from the evidence-based literature and synthesizing responses to key topic area
8/10
Provisional mark /30DEDUCTIONS are applied for the following:
Inappropriate presentation, grammar, punctuation, spelling and referencing
Minimal or extended word limit (maximum 10% leeway) Poor formatting and/or presentation Failure to check/edit spelling, grammar and punctuation
errors Incorrect/incomplete referencing
Final mark 24/300
Assessed by:
Comments:
HSNS 366 Assignment 1 Part B Marking Criteria-Ethical Case Review
