School Improvement Plan
2013-2014 through 2014-2015
School Improvement Plans remain in effect for two years, but a School Leadership Team may amend as often as necessary or appropriate.
Olde Providence Elementary Contact Information
School:
Olde Providence
Courier Number:
#491
Address:
3800 Rea Road
Phone Number:
980-343-3755
Charlotte, NC 28226
Fax Number:
980-343-3722
Learning Community
Central Learning Community
School Website:
http://schools.cms.k12.nc.us/oldeprovidenceES/Pages/Default.aspx
Principal:
Rachel H. McKenzie
Learning Community Superintendent:
Katherine Rea
Olde Providence Elementary School Improvement Team Membership
From GS 115C-105.27: The principal of each school, representatives of the assistant principals, instructional personnel, instructional support personnel, and teacher assistants assigned to the school building, and parents of children enrolled in the school shall constitute a school improvement team to develop a school improvement plan to improve student performance. Representatives of the assistant principals, instructional personnel, instructional support personnel, and teacher assistants shall be elected by their respective groups by secret ballot....Parents serving on school improvement teams shall reflect the racial and socioeconomic composition of the students enrolled in that school and shall not be members of the building-level staff.
Committee Position
Name
Email Address
Date Elected
Principal
Rachel McKenzie
N/A/Required
Assistant Principal Representative
Andrea Runyon
N/A/Required
Teacher Representative
Kaitlin Carswell
2012
Teacher Representative
Laura Short
2011
Inst. Support Representative
Amanda Daniels
2010
Inst. Support Representative
Susan Fletcher
2010
Inst. Support Representative
Patricia Parrish
2013
Teacher Assistant Representative
Travis Meyer
2013
Parent Representative
Melissa Brandon, Chair
2011
Parent Representative
Diedre Chisolm
2012
Parent Representative
Linda Terrell
2013
Parent Representative
Kate Uslan
2013
Parent Representative
Chris Wellons
2013
Parent PTA Liaison Representative
Pam Cohen
2013
Vision Statement
District: CMS provides all students the best education available anywhere, preparing every child to lead a rich and productive life.
School: Olde Providence is committed to providing a nurturing atmosphere conducive to learning where all students and staff strive to be the best they can be. Staff and parents work together collaboratively to promote high academic and behavioral expectations to ensure that students are good citizens and are well-prepared for a lifetime of learning and productivity. Students are challenged at their ability levels to rise to their maximum potential.
Mission Statement
District: The mission of CMS is to maximize academic achievement by every student in every school.
School: To provide high quality and diverse instruction for all students by emphasizing teacher, parent and student cooperative efforts.
Olde Providence Elementary School Shared Beliefs
2013-2014 Olde Providence Elementary School Improvement Plan Report
(26)
All children can and want to learn.
All children learn in different ways, at different times, and through different experiences.
All children deserve a safe, nurturing environment where respect and compassion are shown to each child.
All children learn by example; we have opportunities to be positive role models who influence their development.
We believe character education teaches lifelong values.
All students should be self-directed learners, collaborative workers, quality producers and community builders.
Teacher and parents should become partners in education through open communication.
Olde Providence Elementary School SMART Goals
Provide a duty-free lunch period for every teacher on a daily basis.
Provide duty-free instructional planning time for every teacher under G.S. 115C-105.27 and -301.1, with the goal of proving an average of at least five hours of planning time per week, to the maximum extent that the safety and proper supervision of students may allow during regular student contact hours.
Provide a positive school climate, under CMS regulation JICK-R, by promoting a safe learning environment free of bullying and harassing behaviors.
Eighty percent of 3rd, 4th and 5th grade students will achieve more than one years worth of growth in a years time in reading as measured by the EOG. 90% percent of Kindergarten-2nd grade students will perform at or above grade level as measured by benchmark assessments in reading using Reading 3D and MAP assessments.
To increase the level of instructional rigor by aligning lessons with the Common Core and Essential Standards through the use of PLC planning and the collaborative creation of one open-ended literacy task per quarter and quarterly math common assessments in grades 3rd-5th. To increase the rigor in lessons by implementing Socratic seminars monthly.
Olde Providence Elementary School Assessment Data Snapshot
Below, you will find the SIP composite summary from the May 2013 test results.
Reading
ALL
AMIN
ASIA
BLCK
HISP
MULT
WHTE
EDS
LEP
SWD
AIG
Participation Denominator
364
1
17
34
19
13
280
67
15
35
88
Participation Percent
100
0
0
100
0
0
100
100
0
100
100
Participation Status
Met
Insuf.
Insuf.
Met
Insuf.
Insuf.
Met
Met
Insuf.
Met
Met
Proficiency Denominator
350
1
15
28
18
12
276
61
8
33
88
Proficiency Percent
71.7
0
0
0
0
0
76.4
44.3
0
21.2
98.9
Goal Percent
43.9
29.0
61.5
25.6
28.8
45.7
56.6
28.7
9.4
12.9
90.8
Proficiency Status
Met
Insuf.
Insuf.
Insuf.
Insuf.
Insuf.
Met
Met
Insuf.
Met
Met
Math
ALL
AMIN
ASIA
BLCK
HISP
MULT
WHTE
EDS
LEP
SWD
AIG
Participation Denominator
364
1
17
34
19
13
280
67
15
35
88
Participation Percent
100
0
0
100
0
0
100
100
0
100
100
Participation Status
Met
Insuf.
Insuf.
Met
Insuf.
Insuf.
Met
Met
Insuf.
Met
Met
Proficiency Denominator
351
1
15
28
18
12
277
61
9
33
88
Proficiency Percent
77.5
0
0
0
0
0
82.3
55.7
0
21.2
98.9
Goal Percent
42.3
27.0
71.2
22.2
32.7
42.0
53.8
27.7
17.4
12.4
92.0
Proficiency Status
Met
Insuf.
Insuf.
Insuf.
Insuf.
Insuf.
Met
Met
Insuf.
Met
Met
Science
ALL
AMIN
ASIA
BLCK
HISP
MULT
WHTE
EDS
LEP
SWD
AIG
Participation Denominator
133
0
6
12
6
4
105
23
4
11
32
Participation Percent
100
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
100
Participation Status
Met
~
Insuf.
Insuf.
Insuf.
Insuf.
Met
Insuf.
Insuf.
Insuf.
Met
Proficiency Denominator
129
0
5
11
5
4
104
21
2
10
32
Proficiency Percent
81.4
0
0
0
0
0
86.5
0
0
0
96.9
Goal Percent
52.2
0
70.5
32.6
39.5
54.1
64.7
37.6
16.4
20.6
93.2
Proficiency Status
Met
~
Insuf.
Insuf.
Insuf.
Insuf.
Met
Insuf.
Insuf.
Insuf.
Met
The following chart indicates the Assessment Detail Summary over the previous three years at Olde Providence. Olde Providence MET Expected Growth for the 2012-13 school year. When this report is updated at the District level, we will add the additional numbers to the report.
Olde Providence Elementary School - 600491
2010-2011School Year
2011-2012School Year
2012-2013School Year
Subject
DemographicSubgroup
%Prof.
%Met Exp.Growth
Avg.Growth
HighGrowthRatio
%Prof.
%Met Exp.Growth
Avg.Growth
HighGrowthRatio
%Prof.
%Met Exp.Growth
Avg.Growth
HighGrowthRatio
Grade 03 Reading
Grade Total
94.7
90.8
75.0
Grade 03 Math
Grade Total
96.5
93.1
69.5
Grade 03 Total
Grade Total
95.6
91.9
72.3
Grade 04 Reading
Grade Total
89.9
46.8
-0.064
0.9
94.5
48.7
-0.037
0.9
69.7
Grade 04 Math
Grade Total
92.9
52.1
0.049
1.1
97.6
70.4
0.239
2.4
77.9
Grade 04 Total
Grade Total
91.4
49.5
-0.008
1.0
96.1
59.6
0.101
1.5
73.8
Grade 05 Reading
Grade Total
89.2
57.4
0.084
1.3
90.2
61.9
0.149
1.6
68.9
Grade 05 Math
Grade Total
95.4
83.6
0.387
5.1
92.2
74.0
0.257
2.8
81.1
Grade 05 Science
Grade Total
89.2
89.2
80.3
Grade 05 Total
Grade Total
91.3
70.5
0.235
2.4
90.5
67.9
0.203
2.1
76.8
Reading Total
Total
91.3
52.8
0.019
1.1
91.9
54.7
0.048
1.2
71.0
Math Total
Total
95.0
69.9
0.240
2.3
94.4
72.0
0.247
2.6
76.6
Science Total
Total
89.2
89.2
80.3
EOG Total
Total
92.5
61.3
0.130
1.6
92.7
63.4
0.148
1.7
74.8
School Composite
Total
92.5
61.3
0.130
1.6
92.7
63.4
0.148
1.7
74.8
Attendance
ALL
AMIN
ASIA
BLCK
HISP
MULT
WHTE
EDS
LEP
SWD
AIG
Rate
96.3
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
Status
Met
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
Olde Providence Elementary School Profile
Olde Providence is nestled on 40 Acres of land in the Southeast area of Charlotte. Olde Providence Elementary School was established in 1967. It is currently a K-5 School with 31 classrooms serving approximately 705 students. We have a total staff of approximately 75 people. We have a strong, well-qualified staff. The school has a history of high academic achievement. In years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12, the school achieved the Honor School of Excellence designation, while in 2007-08 and 2008-09, we achieved School of Distinction. One of our academic targets is to be at the 90th percentile in prior years on the first round of testing. Over the past few years, each first round of EOG assessments scores around 88-89 Percentile on the average. The retest in grades 3, 4, and 5 is what pushes the achievement over the 90th percentile in reading. We have solidly hit over 90 in the mathematics achievement. Our academic aim is to achieve over 95% proficient in the total school composite score with 100% students achieving more than a years worth of growth in a years time. However, with the change in the assessment standards, our goals have been adjusted.
Our End of Year test scores are not at a level where we are accustomed to performing. Our composite score of 74.5% in all grades Literacy and Math was a drop of 16% points from the prior year. Although we dropped, our students performed comparatively well. We had the 8th highest composite score for an elementary school in the district. We are proud of our standings; however we recognize that 25% of our students not meeting grade level expectations is far too great. Our SIP plan has taken into account strategies to increase our literacy scores.
In reviewing the data of the school, the end of year K-2 data has been helpful in determining the students who require additional support in the area of literacy. Approximately 22 3rd grade students have been targeted to gain additional foundational literacy skills through small group instruction. Many of those students were new to Olde Providence in 2013-14 school year. Olde Providence registered the only two alternative assessment students for Extend 1 and 2 are students in 3rd grade for the 2013-14 year.
It is noted that Olde Providence had received approximately 60 NCLB students over the past few years. More of those students remained this year, than was anticipated due to the transportation constraints. We are a mid-size school with approximately 710 students in grades Kindergarten to 5th grade. We have a relatively low Economically Disadvantaged Percentage, around 17%.
We have a very active parent community that positively impacts the school program. During the 2012-13 school year we logged over 15,000 volunteer hours. The volunteer group provides needed services to the school to support teachers, students and the total school facility. Our PTA is extremely active. In previous years the PTA has helped to purchase SMART Boards for every classroom, and purchased 30 iPads this past school year through our fundraising campaign, Invest For Success. Olde Providence is the first elementary school in CMS to establish a non-profit foundation. The OPES Foundation is committed to community fundraising in order to work toward improving the outside of the school building.
Olde Providence is proud to have earned a bronze medal from the Alliance for a Healthier Generation. Our staff, students and parents remain committed to participating in Safe Walk to School days, and encouraging healthy choices by our students.
The Olde Providence community takes great pride in our school. A variety of stakeholders including staff, parents, students, and community members are committed to the continued success of our school. We value all students at our school and work to make each student successful.
*TENTATIVE* Revised Strategic Plan Goals
Goal 1: Maximize academic achievement in a personalized 21st century learning environment for every child to graduate career and college ready.
Focus Areas: College and Career Readiness, Academic Growth/High Academic Achievement, Access to Rigor,
Closing Achievement Gaps
Goal 2: Recruit, develop, and retain a premier workforce.
Focus Areas: Recruitment, Professional Development, Retention, New Career Pathways, Leadership Development
Goal 3: Cultivate partnerships with families, businesses, and faith-based or community organizations to provide a sustainable system of support and care for each child.
Focus Areas: Family Engagement, Communications, Partnership Development, Philanthropic Foundation
Goal 4: Promote a system-wide culture of safety, high engagement, customer service, and cultural competence.
Focus Areas: Physical Safety, Social and Emotional Health, High Engagement, Customer Service,
Cultural Competency
Goal 5: Optimize district performance and accountability by strengthening data use, processes and systems.
Focus Areas: Effective & Efficient Processes and Systems, Strategic Management of District Resources, Data
Integrity and Utilization, School Performance Improvement, Disproportionality
Goal 6: Inspire and nurture learning, creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship through the expansion of strategic school design.
Focus Areas: Learning everywhere, all the time, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Strategic School Design
SMART Goal (1):Duty Free Lunch for Teachers
Provide a duty-free lunch period for every teacher on a daily basis.
Strategic Plan Goal:
Goal 4: Promote a system-wide culture of safety, high engagement, customer service, and cultural competence.
Strategic Plan Focus Area:
Physical Safety,
Navigator Pathway:
Enter Kindergarten ready
Advanced Reading in K-2
At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3
At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7
At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5
Successful completion of Math I in grade 9
Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam
Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT
Data Used:
Allotments, 3 hours lunch schedule, number of Assistants
Strategies (determined by what data)
0. Task
0. Task
0. Task (PD)
Point Person
(title/name)
Evidence of Success
(Student Impact)
Funding
(estimated cost / source)
Personnel Involved
Timeline
(StartEnd)
Interim Dates
1.Design the master schedule to allow every teacher to have a duty-free lunch
Rachel McKenzie/Principal
Master Schedule
State and Local for position allotments
Teacher Assistants
September 3, 2013
2.Hire lunch monitors to provide needed monitoring for the students in the cafeteria
Rachel McKenzie/Principal
Monitors hired
Local money for allotments (3 hours per day)
Monitors and Admin
September 9, 2013-June 10, 2014
SMART Goal (2): Duty Free Instructional Planning Time
Provide duty-free instructional planning time for every teacher under G.S. 115C-105.27 and -301.1, with the goal of proving an average of at least five hours of planning time per week, to the maximum extent that the safety and proper supervision of students may allow during regular student contact hours.
Strategic Plan Goal:
Goal 1: Maximize academic achievement in a personalized 21st century learning environment for every child to graduate career and college ready.
Strategic Plan Focus Area:
Academic Growth/High Academic Achievement, Access to Rigor, Closing Achievement Gaps
Navigator Pathway:
Enter Kindergarten ready
Advanced Reading in K-2
At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3
At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7
At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5
Successful completion of Math I in grade 9
Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam
Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT
Data Used:
Strategies (determined by what data)
0. Task
0. Task
0. Task (PD)
Point Person
(title/name)
Evidence of Success
(Student Impact)
Funding
(estimated cost / source)
Personnel Involved
Timeline
(StartEnd)
Interim Dates
1.Design master schedule to allow for an average of 5 hours per week of planning.
Rachel McKenzie/Principal
Master Schedule with planning times
Planning coverage schedule
State and Local money for allotments of staff
Special area, Teacher Assistants
August 25, 2013-June 10, 2014
2.Teachers attend 90 block planning in a team weekly
Amanda Daniels, AF
Planning Coverage Schedule
State and Local money for allotments of staff
Teacher Assistants
August 25, 2013-June 10, 2014
3. Schedule .5 day planning opportunities 4 times per year per classroom teacher to review data
Amanda Daniels, AF
Planning Coverage Schedule
Substitute List
PTA money
Fin Sec, PTA Treasurer, Principal
Quarterly beginning on 9/27/2013
SMART Goal (3): Anti-Bullying / Character Education
Provide a positive school climate, under CMS regulation JICK-R, by promoting a safe learning environment free of bullying and harassing behaviors.
Strategic Plan Goal:
Goal 4: Promote a system-wide culture of safety, high engagement, customer service, and cultural competence.
Strategic Plan Focus Area:
Social and Emotional Health
Navigator Pathway:
Enter Kindergarten ready
Advanced Reading in K-2
At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3
At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7
At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5
Successful completion of Math I in grade 9
Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam
Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT
Data Used:
School Counseling Department Needs Assessment (Students, Staff, & Parents), Discipline Data Report, CMS Student/Parent Surveys
Strategies (determined by what data)
0. Task
0. Task
0. Task (PD)
Point Person
(title/name)
Evidence of Success
(Student Impact)
Funding
(estimated cost / source)
Personnel Involved
Timeline
(StartEnd)
Interim Dates
Bully Liaison / Bully-prevention
Class meetings
Character Education lessons
Character Ambassador skits
School Counselor Wiki
Individual & small group counseling
Classroom guidance lessons
Shining Knights school wide positive incentive program
Character Education & Student Incentive Committee monthly meetings
School Counselor/
Sarah Crist
School Counseling Implementation Survey, Discipline Data Report, Academic Data Reports, School Counseling Time Tracker report
PTA funding
All staff, Character Education & Student Incentive Committee
August 2013-June 2014
Character Education
Character Education Lessons (monthly)
Character Messages on WOPE News (every Monday)
Shining Knights school wide positive incentive program
Character Education Paideia
School Counselor Wiki/PTA Blast videos
School Counselor/
Sarah Crist
Shining Knights Program Data, Discipline Data Report, Academic Data Reports
PTA funding, Community Donations
All staff, Character Education & Student Incentive Committee
August 2013-June 2014
3. Healthy Active Child 30 min.
PE Teacher/Peggy Furr
Running Record Sheets from Recess and PE
PTA/Skate Night Fundraiser
All Classroom
August 2013-June 2014
4. School Health Team
PE Teacher/Peggy Furr/Karen Perkins
Minutes for the Meetings
None
Total School
September 2013-May 2014
SMART Goal (4):
Eighty percent of 3rd, 4th and 5th grade students will achieve more than one years worth of growth in a years time in reading as measured by the EOG. Ninety percent of Kindergarten-2nd grade students will perform at or above grade level as measured by benchmark assessments in reading using Reading 3D and MAP assessments.
Strategic Plan Goal:
Goal 1: Maximize academic achievement in a personalized 21st century learning environment for every child to graduate career and college ready.
Strategic Plan Focus Area:
College and Career Readiness, Academic Growth/High Academic Achievement, Access to Rigor, Closing Achievement Gaps
Navigator Pathway:
Enter Kindergarten ready
Advanced Reading in K-2
At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3
At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7
At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5
Successful completion of Math I in grade 9
Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam
Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT
Data Used:
Reading 3-D, EOY assessments, MAP Data
Strategies (determined by what data)
0. Task
0. Task
0. Task (PD)
Point Person
(title/name)
Evidence of Success
(Student Impact)
Funding
(estimated cost / source)
Personnel Involved
Timeline
(StartEnd)
Interim Dates
1. Guided Reading
Teachers will continue to develop flexible groups based on running records, STAR levels, formative data and lexile levels, Teachers will continue to develop a variety of assessments in order to monitor student growth
Teachers will work in PLC to share reading comprehension strategies that are successful
Daniels AF
PLCs
TRC Levels K-3
Lexile Levels K-5
STAR Levels 1-2
Reading library
PTA Funding
Reading A to Z PTA Purchased
PLCs
EC
LEA
TD
8/2013-6/2014
10-29
1-20
3-29
2. Daily Five
Grades K-5 will implement the Daily 5 in their literacy block
PLCs will share best practices and recent research to support reading stamina for students
Students will learn to pick out just right books, while considering the grade level staircase of increasing text complexity
PLC
Daniels
AF
TRC Levels, 95% of students will reach the end of grade benchmark as determined by Reading Scale
Students/teachers will chart progress of individual reading stamina
Data Card notations
Reading library
PTA Funding
Admin, and PLCs
8/18/2013-6/10/14
3. OP Reading Incentive Program
1-2: continue to use Accelerated Reader
3-5: genre based reading incentive program
Daniels & Patricia Parrish
Student completion charts in individual classrooms
PTA funds
Media Specialist
Academic Facilitator
9/13/2013
1/2014
5/2014
SMART Goal (5):
To increase the level of instructional rigor by aligning lessons with the Common Core and Essential Standards and implementing a monthly Paideia Lesson through the support of PLC planning.
Strategic Plan Goal:
Maximize academic achievement in a personalized 21st century learning environment for every child to graduate career and college ready.
Strategic Plan Focus Area:
College and Career Readiness, Academic Growth/High Academic Achievement, Access to Rigor, Closing Achievement Gaps
Navigator Pathway:
Enter Kindergarten ready
Advanced Reading in K-2
At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3
At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7
At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5
Successful completion of Math I in grade 9
Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam
Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT
Data Used:
EOG Data, K-2 Benchmarks,
Strategies (determined by what data)
0. Task
0. Task
0. Task (PD)
Point Person
(title/name)
Evidence of Success
(Student Impact)
Funding
(estimated cost / source)
Personnel Involved
Timeline
(StartEnd)
Interim Dates
1.Building on 2012-13 school year, a team of teachers were trained at the National Paideia Institute, they will train the classroom teachers on how to facilitate a seminar.
Amanda Daniels AF
Susan Miller TD Teacher
Shannon Harmon
Amber Gentle
Sign-in Sheets for training
Copies of Paideia Questions
Increased literacy scores over two years
PTA
Amber Gentle, Shannon Harmon, Susie Miller
All Staff
9/25/2013
Oct and Nov in Class
2.Teachers will write their own Paideia Seminar questions with the support of the PLC to implement one Socratic seminar per month
PLC
Copies of Paideia Questions
Lesson Plans
Improved student speaking
None
All PLCs
January 2014-March 2014
Olde Providence Elementary School- 600 Waiver Requests
Request for Waiver
1. Insert the waivers you are requesting
Maximum Teaching Load and Maximum Class Size (grades 4-12) [required for all schools with grades 4-12]
2. Please identify the law, regulation or policy from which you are seeking an exemption.
115C-301 (c and d) Maximum Teaching Load and Maximum Class Size [required for all schools with grades 4-12]
3. Please state how the waiver will be used.
Class size will be adjusted to address student individual instructional needs through flexible grouping of students in the most effective utilization of teaching teams. Maximum teaching load will be used to allow teachers in specific areas of the curriculum to teach students designated for specific skill needs and to address the large number of students requesting elective classes.
1. Please state how the waiver will promote achievement of performance goals.
This waiver will allow more flexibility in grouping students to meet their abilities and needs and thus should enhance their achievement on the performance goals.
Approval of Plan
Committee Position
Name
Signature
Date
Principal
Rachel McKenzie
Assistant Principal Representative
Andrea Runyon
Teacher Representative
Kaitlin Carswell
Teacher Representative
Laura Short
Inst. Support Representative
Amanda Daniels
Inst. Support Representative
Susan Fletcher
Inst. Support Representative
Patricia Parrish
Teacher Assistant Representative
Travis Meyer
Parent Representative
Melissa Brandon, Chair
Parent Representative
Diedre Chisolm
Parent Representative
Linda Terrell
Parent Representative
Kate Uslan
Parent Representative
Chris Wellons
Parent PTA Liason
Pam Cohen
Signatures will be obtained for Final SIP/Draft has been presented at the first SLT meeting on September 19, 2013. The revised School Improvement Plan was approved by the School Leadership Team on November 21, 2013. The signatures are maintained under separate cover.
Quarter 2 Review
Committee Position
Name
Signature
Date
Principal
Rachel McKenzie
Assistant Principal Representative
Andrea Runyon
Teacher Representative
Kaitlin Carswell
Teacher Representative
Laura Short
Inst. Support Representative
Amanda Daniels
Inst. Support Representative
Susan Fletcher
Inst. Support Representative
Patricia Parrish
Teacher Assistant Representative
Travis Meyer
Parent Representative
Melissa Brandon, Chair
Parent Representative
Diedre Chisolm
Parent Representative
Linda Terrell
Parent Representative
Kate Uslan
Parent Representative
Chris Wellons
Parent PTA Liason
Pam Cohen
Quarter 3 Review
Committee Position
Name
Signature
Date
Principal
Rachel McKenzie
Assistant Principal Representative
Andrea Runyon
Teacher Representative
Kaitlin Carswell
Teacher Representative
Laura Short
Inst. Support Representative
Amanda Daniels
Inst. Support Representative
Susan Fletcher
Inst. Support Representative
Patricia Parrish
Teacher Assistant Representative
Travis Meyer
Parent Representative
Melissa Brandon, Chair
Parent Representative
Diedre Chisolm
Parent Representative
Linda Terrell
Parent Representative
Kate Uslan
Parent Representative
Chris Wellons
Parent PTA Liason
Pam Cohen
Quarter 4 Review
Committee Position
Name
Signature
Date
Principal
Rachel McKenzie
Assistant Principal Representative
Andrea Runyon
Teacher Representative
Kaitlin Carswell
Teacher Representative
Laura Short
Inst. Support Representative
Amanda Daniels
Inst. Support Representative
Susan Fletcher
Inst. Support Representative
Patricia Parrish
Teacher Assistant Representative
Travis Meyer
Parent Representative
Melissa Brandon, Chair
Parent Representative
Diedre Chisolm
Parent Representative
Linda Terrell
Parent Representative
Kate Uslan
Parent Representative
Chris Wellons
Parent PTA Liason
Pam Cohen
Olde Providence ES
School Improvement Plan Annual Review
Tentative Due Date June 2014
2013-2014
SMART Goal (1):
Strategic Plan Goal:
Strategic Plan Focus Area:
Navigator Pathway:
Enter Kindergarten ready
Advanced Reading in K-2
At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3
At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7
At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5
Successful completion of Math I in grade 9
Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam
Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT
Data Used:
Strategies (determined by what data)
0. Task
0. Task
0. Task
2012-2013
Result
2013-2014
Target
2013-2014
Current Reality
Use quantitative terminology to describe schools progress towards outcome. Describe the effectiveness of each strategy.
1.
2.
3.
4.
SMART Goal (2):
Strategic Plan Goal:
Strategic Plan Focus Area:
Navigator Pathway:
Enter Kindergarten ready
Advanced Reading in K-2
At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3
At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7
At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5
Successful completion of Math I in grade 9
Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam
Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT
Data Used:
Strategies (determined by what data)
0. Task
0. Task
0. Task
2012-2013
Result
2013-2014
Target
2013-2014
Current Reality
Use quantitative terminology to describe schools progress towards outcome. Describe the effectiveness of each strategy.
1.
2.
3.
4.
SMART Goal (3):
Strategic Plan Goal:
Strategic Plan Focus Area:
Navigator Pathway:
Enter Kindergarten ready
Advanced Reading in K-2
At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3
At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7
At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5
Successful completion of Math I in grade 9
Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam
Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT
Data Used:
Strategies (determined by what data)
0. Task
0. Task
0. Task
2012-2013
Result
2013-2014
Target
2013-2014
Current Reality
Use quantitative terminology to describe schools progress towards outcome. Describe the effectiveness of each strategy.
1.
2.
3.
4.
SMART Goal (4):
Strategic Plan Goal:
Strategic Plan Focus Area:
Navigator Pathway:
Enter Kindergarten ready
Advanced Reading in K-2
At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3
At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7
At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5
Successful completion of Math I in grade 9
Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam
Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT
Data Used:
Strategies (determined by what data)
0. Task
0. Task
0. Task
2012-2013
Result
2013-2014
Target
2013-2014
Current Reality
Use quantitative terminology to describe schools progress towards outcome. Describe the effectiveness of each strategy.
1.
2.
3.
4.
SMART Goal (5):
Strategic Plan Goal:
Strategic Plan Focus Area:
Navigator Pathway:
Enter Kindergarten ready
Advanced Reading in K-2
At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3
At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7
At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5
Successful completion of Math I in grade 9
Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam
Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT
Data Used:
Strategies (determined by what data)
0. Task
0. Task
0. Task
2012-2013
Result
2013-2014
Target
2013-2014
Current Reality
Use quantitative terminology to describe schools progress towards outcome. Describe the effectiveness of each strategy.
1.
2.
3.
4.
SMART Goal (6):
Strategic Plan Goal:
Strategic Plan Focus Area:
Navigator Pathway:
Enter Kindergarten ready
Advanced Reading in K-2
At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 3
At/Above Grade Level in Reading/Writing Grade 7
At/Above Grade Level in Math Grades 3-5
Successful completion of Math I in grade 9
Take and pass at least 1 AP/IB/Post-Secondary class & exam
Score 1550 on SAT or 22 on ACT
Data Used:
Strategies (determined by what data)
0. Task
0. Task
0. Task
2012-2013
Result
2013-2014
Target
2013-2014
Current Reality
Use quantitative terminology to describe schools progress towards outcome. Describe the effectiveness of each strategy.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Top Related