ZIMBABWE HEALTH FINANCING · financing schemes or management institutions, and providers and...
Transcript of ZIMBABWE HEALTH FINANCING · financing schemes or management institutions, and providers and...
ZIMBABWE HEALTH FINANCING
GWATI GWATIHealth Economist: Planning and Donor
Coordination MOHCCTechnical team leader National Health
Accounts.
Our approach to HFP Development
• Key steps in the development of the policy have been undertaken:
– The development of this policy is highly consultative
– A Technical Working Group was established to drive preparatory activities towards this policy
– The TWG established a Core Team to focus on the specific pillars in the policy.
– A number of meeting sessions were convened by TWG- to arrive at draft zero
• Next steps:
– stakeholder consultations
– Draft with stakeholder inputs
– Validation workshop
Conceptual Framework: HFP Architecture
Overview of the Policy• Motivation and Context
• Policy Strategic Context
• Health Financing Policy Strategic Directions
• General Health Financing Policy Guidelines
• Health Financing Functions
Resource Mobilisation
and Revenue Collection
Purchasing and Provider
Payment Mechanisms
Risk Pooling and Cross
Subsidisation
Governance
For Each, the HFP States i) The Guiding Principles, ii) Policy Objectives and iii) Policy
Direction
Evidence of Current Situation and Rationale
Conceptual Framework
Motivation and Context
• Global call for UHC
• Socio-economic factors
• Increasing Disease Burden
• Need to harmonise all health financing functions
Overview of Health Financing in Zimbabwe
• Zimbabwe’s health system has been consistently financed by a mixture of funding sources with the major ones being :–Government through central budget allocation and
subnational governments i.e. local authorities– AID Agencies and Multilateral Organizations– Private companies, – Non-Governmental Organizations, – households (through out-of-pocket payments)
HEALTH FINANCING POLICY
Summary of Policy directions
Strategic Directions
Vision• The whole population of Zimbabwe has access to the highest possible level of health and quality of life regardless of income levels, social status, or residency.
Mission• To provide, administer, coordinate, promote and advocate for the provision of equitable, appropriate, accessible, affordable and acceptable quality health services and care to all Zimbabweans while maximizing the use of available resources, in line with the Primary Health Care Approach.
Goal• The goal of the Health Financing Policy is to guide Zimbabwe’s health system to move towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC) including financial risk protection, access to quality essential health care services, and access to safe, effective, quality, and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all by 2030.
Policy Objectives
The National Health Financing Policy will be focused on reaching the following objectives:
• Mobilizing adequate resources for predictable sustainable funding of the health sector;
• Ensuring effective, equitable ,efficient and evidence based allocation and utilization of health resources;
• Enhancing the adequacy of health financing and financial protection of households and ensure that no-one is impoverished through spending on health by promoting risk pooling and income cross subsidies in the health sector;
• Ensuring that purchasing arrangements and provider payment methods emphasize incentivizing provision of quality, equitable and efficient health care services
• Strengthening institutional framework and administrative arrangements to ensure effective, efficient and accountable links between revenue generation and collection, pooling and purchasing of health services.
Guiding Principles and ValuesThe following values will guide the Health Financing Policy at all levels:
• Social solidarity
• Equity in health and health care
•Gender equality
•Healthcare as a right and shared responsibility
• Essential quality services integrating comprehensive primary health care
•Cost benefit and value for money
• Efficiency
• Appropriateness
• Affordability
• Public participation and user and provider satisfaction
• Transparency and accountability
•Ownership and
• Partnership in health
Sustainable Resource Mobilization and Revenue
Collection Policy Directions• The GoZ will seek to strengthen domestic health financing and abide by the
Abuja Declaration on Health where not less than 15% of budget shall be allocated to health.
• The GoZ will spend not less than $60 per capita per year to ensure the minimum comprehensive benefit package is financed.
• The GoZ will explore options for progressive earmarked taxes and levies to raise additional resources for health.
• Current mechanism to raise additional revenue to the health sector that has been successful and sustainable will be maintained and expanded where feasible. Examples include the National AIDS Levy, Health Services Fund, Workman’s Compensation Fund, Assisted Medical Treatment Order, and Accident Victims Compensation Fund on Motor Vehicle Insurance.
• The government will encourage various forms of mandatory prepayment mechanisms such as social health insurance (SHI), community based health insurance (CBHI), national health insurance (NHI) especially for the informal sector and rural areas as a means of achieving universal health coverage.
• Private health insurance will continue to be available as a voluntary prepayment mechanism for services not covered in the minimum benefits package.
• Special revenue generation provisions will be made for diseases of high national public health concern/significance as and when they emerge.
• All external aid for health will be harmonized, coordinated, monitored and evaluated in line with health priorities and plans of the government of Zimbabwe.
• The GoZ will continue to encourage and expand involvement of local philanthropy and charities for special health initiatives at all levels of care.
• The GoZ will explore, ensuring consistency with its key policy principles and goals, innovative partnership mechanism with the private sector to increase resources to health such as Public Private Partnerships, joint ventures and outsourcing guided by a strong regulatory framework.
Sustainable Resource Mobilization and Revenue
Collection Policy Directions cntd…
Risk Pooling and Cross Subsidization
Policy Direction
• The government of Zimbabwe will explore new and strengthen existing mechanisms for promoting equity, risk equalization and reduce fragmentation with a special emphasis on ensuring that health spending does not lead to or deepen impoverishment especially in the poor and indigent population.
• A national mandatory prepayment scheme will be introduced and expanded as a key form of pooling risk to reduce out of pocket payments.
• There will be clear separation of functions and roles between pooling and purchasing of healthcare services.
Purchasing Policy Directions • Priority will be given to the purchase of cost effective services and those
essential for achieving universal health care, that is, the Essential Health Benefit package at all levels of care (primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary)
• A framework for regular evaluation of benefits and cost interventions will be put in place to ensure optimal choices.
• Services will be purchased from all registered and accredited providers (private and public).
• There will be separation of purchasing and provision functions for health care services.
• Health care resources will be allocated using needs based formula to achieve equity.
• There will be strengthening of current purchasing mechanisms and developing others that ensure that those who cannot afford to pay can still access services without facing impoverishment.
• There will be use of a mix of provider payment mechanisms that promote optimal provider performance while containing costs.
• There will be quality assurance for services purchased irrespective of funding mechanisms and level of care.
Governance Policy Directions
• Establishment of a Health Financing Coordinating body within the MOHCC to coordinate the various pillars of this policy (i.e., funds collection, pooling and purchasing functions within the GoZ)
• Financial management autonomy will be accorded to operational levels to effectively perform various health financing functions within the confines of the Public Finance Management Acts.
• The role of performance based financing in current and future schemes to be clearly defined where it strengthens the purchaser’s function.
• Planning, budgeting and resource allocation will be harmonized along the results based management principles in consultation with all stakeholders.
• The GoZ will strengthen existing mechanisms and/or establish new structures and systems for coordination and harmonization of funding at all levels of health care financing.
National Health Accounts
2015 in Zimbabwe
Outline Background and objectives
Methods
Findings
General findings and international comparison
Who funds the health system
Revenue of health schemes and financing sources
Who manages health funding
Financing schemes and financing agents
Who consumes health expenditure and for what purpose
Health expenditure by health providers
Health expenditure by health functions
Summary and recommendations
Background
Government of Zimbabwe is committed to universal
health coverage (UHC)
Since 2010, Zimbabwe made significant strides in
reducing infant mortality rates (IMR) and Maternal Mortality
Rates (MMR)
Health financing landscape may have been changed
since 2010 when last round of NHA was conducted
To understand key players and financial flows in the
health system, NHA 2015 was conducted
Objectives of the NHA
1. Provide updated estimates of health expenditure in
Zimbabwe’s health care system and an understanding of
financial flow
2. Provide financial estimates for the health system in
Zimbabwe at three levels, including sources of funding,
financing schemes or management institutions, and
providers and functions of health expenses;
3. Provide empirical evidence on health financing for
developing health financing policy and strategies in
Zimbabwe, and
4. Produce baseline information on health expenditure for
comparison to future reforms.
Terminologies1. Revenue of health financing schemes: Revenue is an increase in
the funds of a health care financing scheme, through specificcontribution mechanisms.
2. Financing sources (FS): The revenues of the health financingschemes received or collected through specific contributionmechanisms
3. Health schemes (HF): Components of a country’s health financialsystem that channel revenues received and use those funds to payfor, or purchase, the activities inside the health accounts
4. Financing agent (FA): Institutional units that manage health financingschemes.
5. Health providers (HP): Entities that receive money in exchange for orin anticipation of producing the activities inside the health accountsboundary.
6. Health functions (HC): the types of goods and services provided andactivities performed within the health accounts boundary.
General Findings and
International Comparisons
Overview of Findings
NHA Indicators (General) 2015
Total population(Zimstat) 13,943,242
Total nominal GDP (US dollar [USD])(Zimstat) $14,007,108,087
Total government health expenditure (USD) $309,699,620
Total health expenditure (THE) $1,447,785,504
THE per capita (USD) $103.83
THE as % of nominal GDP 10.34%
Government health expenditure as % total government expenditure 8.72%
Regional comparison
11.38
10.6210.34
9.258.93 8.80
6.98
5.58 5.414.99 4.81
4.33
3.37 3.313.04
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Tota
l hea
lth
exp
end
itu
re a
s %
of
GD
P
Total Health Expenditure (THE) % Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
Health expenditure per capita (USD)
570
499 494482
385
248
179
105 10486
5242
2919 14
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
Tota
l hea
lth
exp
end
itu
re p
er c
apit
a
Total Health Expenditure (THE) per Capita in US$
Who funds
the health system?
Financing sources (Institutions)
Financing sourcesAmount
(Million USD)
Percentage
of THE
Government (Central and local governments) 309.70 21.39%
Corporations (Employers) 411.54 28.43%
Households (OOP plus private contribution to
health insurance)362.46 25.04%
Non-profit institutions serving households
(NPISH)3.24 0.22%
Rest of the world (Donors) 360.85 24.92%
Total 1447.79 100.00%
Financing source by sector
Financing sources Amount (Million USD) Percentage (%)
Public (Government+ HI from
public employers)502.43 34.70%
Private (OOP+ HI form private
employers or HH)584.51 40.37%
External (Donors) 360.85 24.92%
Total 1447.79 100.00%
Who manages health expenditure?
Who manages money
(Health schemes)
Government schemes and compulsory contributory health care financing schemes451.33
31%
Voluntary health care payment
schemes433.49
30%
Household out-of-pocket payment
343.7424%
Rest of the world financing schemes
219.2215%
Who manages money (Institutions)---
Financing agent
General government
451.3331.2%
Insurance corporations
430.2629.7%
Corporations3.240.2%
Households343.7423.7%
Rest of the world
219.2215.1%
Out of pocket health expenditure
The total out of pocket expenditure reported on the household survey was estimated at $343.74 million, equivalent to $24.65 per capita.
7.6 percent of households in Zimbabwe incurred catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) in 2015
Poorest Less poor Middle Less rich Richest Total Pop
Incidence of CHE 13.38% 8.68% 8.37% 5.20% 2.77% 7.64%
Health expenditure by providers
and functions
Health expenditure by providers
Hospitals36.5%
Providers of ambulatory health
care33.3%
Providers of health care system
administration and financing
12.1%
Providers of ancillary services
6.7%
Providers of preventive care
6.2%
Retailers and Other
providers of medical goods4.1%
Unspecified health care providers
0.7%
Rest of the world0.3%
Rest of economy0.1%
Residential long-term care facilities
0.0%
Other1.1%
Health expenditure by functions
Curative care56.6%
Governance, and health system and financing
administration12.1%
Preventive care15.4%
Ancillary services (non-specified by function)
7.4%
Medical goods (non-specified by function)
3.5%
Long-term care (health)2.4%
Other health care services not elsewhere classified
(n.e.c.)1.8%
Rehabilitative care0.9%
Other5.1%
Health expenditure of
Government schemes by health
functions
Functions
Amount
(Million
USD)
Percentage
Curative care 200.77 64.83%
Rehabilitative care 0.69 0.22%
Ancillary services (non-specified by function) 1.50 0.48%
Preventive care 75.78 24.47%
Governance, and health system and financing administration 30.96 10.00%
Total 309.70 100.00%
Health expenditure of health
insurance from public employers
by health functions
FunctionsAmount
(Millions USD)Percentage
Curative care 85.76 44.50%
Inpatient curative care 50.69 26.30%
Outpatient curative care 35.07 18.20%
Ancillary services (non-specified by function) 58.30 30.25%
Medical goods (non-specified by function) 21.57 11.19%
Governance, and health system and financing
administration27.10 14.06%
Total 192.73 100.00%
Health expenditure of health
insurance from private employers or
households by functions
Functions
Amount
(Millions
USD)
Percentage
Curative care 139.10 57.78%
Inpatient curative care 91.41 37.97%
Outpatient curative care 47.67 19.80%
Unspecified curative care (n.e.c.) 0.02 0.01%
Ancillary services (non-specified by function) 37.46 15.56%
Medical goods (non-specified by function) 23.39 9.72%
Preventive care 0.69 0.29%
Governance, and health system and financing
administration40.12 16.66%
Total 240.76 100.00%
Summary and Recommendations
Summary Overall health expenditure
THE was estimated at $1.45 billion, equivalent to
$103.83/capita.
THE accounted for more than 10 percent of GDP of the same
year
Financing sources
Domestic resources account for the majority (75.74 percent) of
THE
Donors remain an important source of funding for health in
Zimbabwe (24.26 percent), particularly for preventive care.
Health insurance schemes through public and private employers
and individuals accounted for 28.92 percent of THE, with
expenditures of $430.26 million.
Financial protection
OOP represents 25 percent of THE
7.6 percent of households incurred catastrophic health
expenditure
13.38% of the poorest households incurred catastrophic health
expenditure
Summary (continued…) Health providers and functions
Health expenditure was unevenly distributed
between curative and preventive care.
Curative care shared 57 percent of THE, while
preventive care accounted for 15 percent of
THE
The administrative costs accounts for more
than 14% of funds managed by health insurance
companies
More than 30% of health expenditure of health
insurance for public employees were spent to
ancillary services
Recommendations Increase government spending on health
Advocate allocation of government budget for
health, reversing the decline trend of budget
allocation.
Advocate both health and economic benefits of
investing in health
Allocate more resources for preventive care
Government needs to take more responsibility of
preventive care
Advocate value for money of investing in
preventive care
Improve efficiency of health insurance schemes
Reduce administrative costs
Strategic contracting health providers
Utilization review of claims
Reduce fragmentation of health insurance
schemes
Recommendations (continued…)
Develop strategic purchasing mechanisms
Pay health providers based on outputs or outcomes
rather than inputs
Grant health providers with autonomies
Incentivize better quality and outcomes.
Address inequities of utilization of health services
and catastrophic health expenditure
Subsidize the poor
Improve the quality of care at public
facilities, particularly for ancillary services (e.g.
imaging services)
Include the poor in the social welfare safety net
Carry out an equity study to understand better the
inequality issue.
Strengthen the integration of vertical and disease
specific programs
THANK YOU FOR
LISTENING
END