Yorkshire and North East Conference '13 - Bridge Building Leadership, Phil Vincent
-
Upload
association-of-university-administrators -
Category
Business
-
view
130 -
download
0
Transcript of Yorkshire and North East Conference '13 - Bridge Building Leadership, Phil Vincent
Bridge-Building Leadership
Joining up the university
Richard Sharpe, Managing Director, Elementa Leadership
AUA Yorkshire and North East Conference
November 15th 2013
Elementa Leadership works extensively in UK higher education and believes that HE is
critical to the success of the UK’s growing knowledge and innovation economy and
that it is essential that HE is sustained, protected and encouraged to flourish if the UK
is to achieve it’s economic and societal goals.
About Elementa Leadership
Elementa Leadership is an organisation development
consultancy. It works in partnership with its clients to
develop greater strategic agility. The consultancy was
formed in October 2008 by Richard Sharpe, formerly
Associate Director, Leadership, with The Work Foundation.
Our work is informed by a strong evidence base drawn
from organisational psychology, management theory
and ‘whole systems’ thinking.
We have significant practical international experience
of working at strategic and senior levels, across sectors.
About Elementa Leadership
Elementa Leadership has organised two US study visits for UK HE leaders, as a part of
our ongoing research in to the ‘Agile University’. These have included meetings with
senior leaders and key staff at Columbia, NYU, University of Michigan and Ohio State
University.
Ongoing public sector retrenchment
Changes in funding and policy direction (decreasing government financial
support)
Prospect of institutions being allowed to ‘fail’
Intensification of global and local competition (including the prospect of
private universities and increased competition for international students)
Students as customers? What is the ‘student experience’?
Research, REF & Impact
The impact of technology on teaching & learning (MOOC’s)
Adaptive Challenges that UK HE Faces
Fit between an Organisation and its Environment
Jones, 2004
The ability of the university, as a living human system, to thrive
on and learn from continuous waves of change such that
change becomes a natural and inevitable part of organisational
life and not an isolated and threatening event. The ability to
continually develop new capabilities and improve upon those
that already exist, as a source of sustainable strategic
advantage.
Strategic Agility
Bridges, Connections and Collaboration
An Interconnected Future – The Future of Global HE
Research Partnering around the world’s great problems
Transnational Education Collaboration
British Council, 2013
Partnering with Students
Partnering with the City Region
Interdisciplinary (Collaborative) Research
Building a new Academic / Administrative Interface
What are the blocks to more effective collaborative
cross-boundary working in your University?
Discussion Point
The Seven Key Collaborative Factors
1. The partners have a shared, specific interest of purpose that they are
committed to and can’t achieve (as well) on their own.
2. The partners want to pursue a collaborative solution now and are willing to
contributed something to the effort.
3. The appropriate people are at the table.
4. The partners have an open, credible process.
5. The effort has a passionate champion (or champions), with credibility and
clout.
6. The partners have trusting relationships.
7. The partners use the skills of collaborative leadership.
Linden, 2010
Linden’s Collaboration Framework
Appropriate People
Open Process
Shared Goals
High Priority CHAMPION
Linden, 2010
1. Tolerance for ambiguity is “the ability to accept lack of clarity and ambiguity
and to be able to deal with it constructively”
2. Behavioural flexibility is “the ability to adapt one’s own behaviour to
different requirements and situations”
3. Communicative awareness is “the ability to establish relationships between
linguistic expressions and cultural contents, to identify, and consciously work
with, various communicative conventions of foreign partners, and to modify
correspondingly one’s own linguistics forms of expression”
Leading Across Boundaries –The Intercultural Competence Assessment (INCA)Byram et al, 1997
4. Knowledge discovery is “the ability to acquire new knowledge of a culture
and cultural practices and the ability to act using that knowledge, those
attitudes and those skills under the constraints of real-time communication
and interaction”
5. Respect for otherness is “the readiness to suspend disbelief about other
cultures and belief about one’s own”
6. Empathy is “the ability to intuitively understand what other people think and
how they feel in concrete situations”
Leading Across Boundaries –Intercultural Competence Assessment (INCA)Byram et al, 1997
In the Denial stage, individuals must learn to recognize the existence of cultural
differences.
In the Defence stage, people can diminish their polarized perspectives by emphasizing
“common humanity” and similarities in needs and feelings.
In the Minimization stage, a person needs to develop cultural self-awareness and learn
that even if there are similarities between cultures, there are also a lot of differences.
In the Acceptance stage, individuals must refine their analysis of cultural contrasts,
making cultural differences the focus and practicing cultural frame-of-reference
shifting.
In the Adaptation stage, one must perfect one’s cultural frame-of-reference skills and
increase one’s ability to empathize with others.
Bennett’s Model of Intercultural Sensitivity
Strategies for Working Across Different Cultures
Linden, 2010
Respect difference; don’t allow them to overshadow the commonalities.
Work on relationships; take time to let trust grow.
Become “bilingual”; take time to decode other culture(s).
Do real work together on a common goal.
Co-locate staff from several agencies or units in the same space.
Identify and use the strengths of each organisation.
Make needed systemic changes when trying to alter an organisation's culture
(in order that it can build and sustain collaboration across cultural
boundaries) .
What does a Bridge-Building Leader do?
EMPATHY THROUGH LISTENING
AND CURIOSITY
TRUST THROUGH
HUMILTY AND AUTHENTICTY
COURAGE TO HAVE THE DIALOGUE
CO-CREATES SHARED
PURPOSE AND ‘BUILDS
COMMUNITY’
SEEKS ‘WIN-WIN’ HIGH QUALITY
OUTCOMES
ENGAGES AND INFORMS
STAKEHOLDERS
CREATES A LEGITIMISED ‘ROAD MAP’
VOICE
EQUITY EXCELLENCE
COMMUNITY
A POST-HEROIC LEADERSHIP MODEL
© Elementa Leadership
Achieves deep empathy with and understanding of others’ perspectives and encourages everyone
to do the same
Builds trust by acting authentically with humility- being open and transparent
Courage to actively ‘step in’ to contested ‘sites’ and conflict and engage in dialogue
Co-creates Shared Purpose promoting a sense of ‘voice’, control and influence (more pull less
push) and community. Can handle ambiguity and uncertainty.
Looks for collaborative win/win high quality outcomes and solutions (will not readily accept
mediocrity) to meet shared interests (equity and justice).
Keeps key stakeholders ‘on board’ as ‘champions’ and does not surprise these stakeholders or
‘blindside’ them (Political skill)
Develops a ‘legitimised’ strategic framework (goals, priorities and strategies) and process for
sustainable collaboration and/or partnership – building confidence with successful ‘baby steps’
first
What does a Bridge-Building Leader do?
Think of your University’s best Bridge-Building leaders
Who are they?
and
What do they do that others don’t?
Reflection Point
The Re-Invention of the
Academic / Administrative Interface
(The foundation of the ‘Agile University’)
A Job for Bridge-Builders?
Model One:
Command and Control (Don’t Trust the Academics)
Model Two:
Avoidance / Consulting to the Void (Don’t upset the Academics)
Model Three:
Partnership and Collaboration (Let’s Work Together)
The Current Academic / Administrative Interface
The Provost’s encountered took the academic mission as the core of
their role and orchestrated a range of academic and administrative
staff and services to best support this mission and the academics that
were key to its delivery.
These role holders were all established academics who had at some
point in their careers opted to pursue a managerial route.
There appeared no confusion or lack of clarity in the
academic/administrative interface.
Lesson from the US - Appoint a Provost
The Provost’s appeared to act as ‘bridge-builders’ between the
academic and administrative communities and as a result it appeared
that a productive, solution orientated focus occupied this space.
The Provost’s seemed to find it relatively easy to identify problems
and opportunities and to get the right people around the table to find
appropriate solutions.
Lesson from the US - Appoint a Provost
An Integrated framework for Planning,
Performance and Accountability
A new bridge that will join up the university
Complete our Bridge-Building Leadership Self Assessment Questionnaire
and find out if you are a:
Master Bridge-Builder
Effective Bridge-Builder
Apprentice Bridge-Builder
Bridge Blocker
How effective a Bridge-Builder are you?
Launching December 1st 2013