WP2 – Design of c ase studies
description
Transcript of WP2 – Design of c ase studies
„The sole responsibility for the content of this presentation lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Neither the EACI nor the European Commission are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. “
WP2 – Design of case studies
Kaj WågdahlClimate Protection Agency Sweden
WP2 – Design of case studies
The aim of the work package
• Review of the State of the Art• Present good examples in the form
of Case studies
State of the Art Report
• EU policies, programmes and projects• DSP strategies• TRAILBLAZER case studies• Conclusions and recommendations• The report can be downloaded from the project
website – update by the end of the project
Case Studies
• Sutton• Croydon• Borlänge• Heathrow• Bristol• Regensburg
• Lucca• Bordeaux• Aalborg• TfL Palestra• Vercelli• Zagreb
• Växjö• Eskilstuna• Berlin
Case studies - overview
Conclusions from the case studies
• Range of project owners and involvement of stakeholders
• Range of investment in infrastructure (buildings, ICT, vehicles etc)
• Range of technical level/complexity. Both Low-tech and High-tech solutions
Conclusions from the case studies
• Most cities/organizations have combined solutions and strategies
• Consolidation is a key element in several cases – direct or indirect
• New solutions are continuously developed
Success factors
• Co-operation between actors• Political support• Willingness to act in favor of a general purpose • Economy, environment and social aspects in balance• Look for a combination of measures• Periodic data collection is essential• Fair and trustworthy information