Workshop Thermocouple

118
Better Standards, Better Life 1 June, 2014 Dr. Yong-Gyoo Kim Center for Thermometry, Division of Physical Metrology Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science Thermocouple thermometry

description

termometry with thermocouple

Transcript of Workshop Thermocouple

Page 1: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 1

June, 2014

Dr. Yong-Gyoo Kim

Center for Thermometry,

Division of Physical Metrology

Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science

Thermocouple thermometry

Page 2: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 2

Part I. Heat and Temperature

1. Unit and Scale of Temperature

2. Heat Transfer and Thermal Properties

Page 3: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 3

1. Unit and scale of Temperature

Lord Kelvin Ludwig Boltzmann

Page 4: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 4

1.1 What is temperature ?

Temperature Degree of hotness or coldness of objects

intuitively

Exactly, level of thermal energy (kT) k : Boltzmann constant

Kinetic energy due to a microscopic motion of particles, energy due to phonon ½ mv2 = ½ kT

Phonon: quantum mechanical description of an elementary vibrational motion

Heat is caused from the vibration of particles

Temperature is a quantitative description of this vibrational motion.

Page 5: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 5

Temperature Kelvin Degrees Celsius

Coldest temperature achieved 100 pK −273.149 999 999 900 °C

Triple point of water 273.16 K 0.01 °C

Sun’s visible surface 5,778 K 5,505 °C

Lightening bolt’s channel 28 kK 28,000 °C

Sun’s core 16 MK 16,000,000 °C

Thermonuclear weapon peak temperature 350 MK 350,000,000 °C

Core of a high-mass star on its last day 3 GK 3,000,000,000 °C

CERN’s proton vs nucleus collisions 10 TK 10 ×1012 °C

Universe 5.391×10−44 s after Big Bang 1.417×1032 K 1.417×1032 °C

Some examples of temperature

Page 6: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 6

The first thermometer

In 1594, G. Galilei A type of gas thermometer

Volume change with temperature

Page 7: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 7

1.2 Unit of temperature

International unit: K or oC Absolute thermodynamic scale : Kelvin, K degree Celsius (oC) Common and practical unit 1 oC = 1 K K = 273.15 + oC

Non SI unit Fahrenheit scale: oF In Europe and USA oF = oC x 9/5 + 32

Rankine scale: oR Chemical engineering in USA oR = K x 9/5

Page 8: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 8

degree Celsius (oC)

A. Celsius (Sweden ) in 1742

Ice point : 100 oC

Water boiling point : 0 oC

Divided into 100 parts

In 1744, M. Strømer

After Celsius passed away

Reverse the two fixed point value

Ice point :0 oC, boiling point : 100 oC

Currently used with Kelvin internationally

Page 9: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 9

Kelvin, K

For a reversible Carnot engine, Heat efficiency is proportional to temperature

Absolute temperature ,T, is defined as above. For ideal gases, PV = constant x T At T = 0, volume of gas should be zero.

For real gases, extrapolated volume goes to zero (T = 0 K).

1

2

1

2

TT

QQ

=

Page 10: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 10

Volume vs Temperature (Charles’ Law)

T[K]

Page 11: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 11

1.3 Temperature scale

Before 1954, Celsius scale used Ice point and boiling point of water

After 1954, thermodynamic scale used Triple point of water (TPW) was defined as definition of

temperature scale TPW 273.16 K

Definition of temperature scale The unit of thermodynamic temperature, the kelvin,

symbol K, is defined as the fraction 1/273.16 of the thermodynamic temperature of the triple point of water

Page 12: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 12

Triple point cell of Water

Page 13: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 13

History of temperature scale

ITS-27 Boiling point of oxygen (-182.970 oC) ~ radiation thermometer range 6 fixed-points

ITS-48 Change of Ag fixed-point value Change of interpolation equation of pyrometer Include several secondary fixed-points

IPTS-68 Down to TPW of H2 (13.81 K) 11 fixed-points Change of interpolation equation of standard thermometer

ITS-90 Current temperature scale

PLTS-2000 Down to 0.9 mK

Mise en Pratique of Kelvin (MeP-K) Current definition of Kelvin

Page 14: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 14

Classification of thermometers

Primary vs. Secondary Primary : Clear equation of state

Measurement of thermodynamic temperature Secondary : Temperature-dependent parameter (voltage, current, length, etc)

Resistance thermometer, thermocouple, etc.

Page 15: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 15

Standard vs. Industrial thermometer Standard : Realization of temperature scale Gas thermometer Vapor pressure thermometer Standard platinum resistance thermometer Pyrometer

Industrial : Except for the standards Thermocouple, Glass thermometer, Thermistor, etc

Page 16: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 16

2. Heat Transfer and Thermal Properties Temperature measurement is just measurement of the

heat exchange between thermometer and system.

Page 17: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 17

2.1 Heat transfer

3 transfer mode Conduction, Convection, Radiation

Page 18: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 18

A. Conduction

transfer of thermal energy between regions of matter due to a temperature gradient In solid, liquid, gas, and plasma Vibration of solid atoms, collision or diffusion of liquid (gas) atoms

(molecules, radicals) Heat flow rate (watt, W)

k : thermal conductivity ( ) A : area ∆T : temperature gradient ∆x : distance

xTkAQ

∆∆

=ƥ

KW/m ⋅

Page 19: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 19

Thermal conductivity, k, of various materials

Page 20: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 20

Thermal conductivity, k, of various materials

Material Thermal conductivity W/(m·K) Material Thermal conductivity

W/(m·K)

Silica Aerogel 0.004 - 0.04 Thermal epoxy 1 - 7

Air 0.025 Glass 1.1

Wood 0.04 - 0.4 Soil 1.5

Hollow Fill Fibre Insulation 0.042 Concrete, stone 1.7

Alcohols and oils 0.1 - 0.21 Ice 2

Polypropylene 0.25 Sandstone 2.4

Mineral oil 0.138 Stainless steel 12.11 ~ 45.0

Rubber 0.16 Lead 35.3

LPG 0.23 - 0.26 Aluminum 237 (pure)120—180 (alloys)

Cement, Portland 0.29 Gold 318

Epoxy (silica-filled) 0.30 Copper 401

Epoxy (unfilled) 0.12 - 0.177 Silver 429

Water (liquid) 0.6 Diamond 900 - 2320

Thermal grease 0.7 - 3 Graphene (4840±440) - (5300±480)

Page 21: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 21

B. Convection

transfer of heat from one place to another by the physical movement of fluids In liquids, gases Natural (free) convection Forced convection by fan, pump, etc

Heat flow rate (watt, W) between solid and fluid

h : convection heat transfer ( W/m2K) A : area Ts : surface temperature of solid Tenvironm: temperature of fluid far from the surface

)( environms TThAQ −=∆•

Page 22: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 22

Some examples of convection

Mantle convection

Atmospheric convection Foehn phenomenon

Heat sink radiator

Page 23: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 23

Convection heat transfer coefficient, h, of some phases

Process h [Wm-2 K-1]

Free Convection Gases 2 ~ 25

Liquids 50 ~ 1 000

Forced Convection Gases 25 ~ 250

Liquids 50 ~ 20 000

Convection with phase change

Boiling or condensation 2 500 ~ 100 000

Page 24: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 24

C. Radiation

Energy in the form of electromagnetic waves with continuous spectrum

All matter higher than absolute zero temperature

Sunlight is thermal radiation generated by the hot plasma of the Sun.

Stefan-Boltzmann law

E : energy radiated per unit area (W/m2)

ε : emissivity

σ : Stefan-Boltzmann constant

T: Absolute temperature

4TE σε=

Page 25: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 25

2.2 Thermal properties

Three important properties Thermal conductivity, heat capacity, latent heat

Page 26: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 26

A. Heat capacity (C)

Heat (q) required to raise the temperature by 1 K C = q/(T2-T1)

Higher C, larger q ⇒ need more time to stabilize

For fast measurement, sensor having higher k and smaller C required.

Page 27: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 27

Heat capacity of some materials

Material Per unit mass

JK-1kg-1 Per unit volume

JK-1cm-3

Copper Gold Silver Aluminum Zinc Tin Mercury Stainless steel Silicon water Ice Pyrex Alumina (Al2O3)

Magnesia (MgO) Polystyrene Silicone oil

385 129 235 903 389 227

139.3 480 712

4 179 2 040 835 800 960

1 300 1 548

3.44 2.49 2.47 2.44 2.78 1.66 1.88 3.83 1.65 4.17 1.88 1.85 3.04 3.46 1.37 1.45

Page 28: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 28

B. Latent heat

Heat associated with phase change solid ⇔ liquid ⇔ gas Fixed-points use latent heat of materials

Page 29: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 29

Simple melting and freezing of pure solid

For melting, Qin = latent heat For freezing, Qout = latent heat Basically, Tmelting = Tfreezing

But little difference due to impurities, solid structure During freezing, supercooling and recovery observed

Require more heat for solidification at initial to overcome the surface energy between solid and liquid

There is a critical size for nucleation of solid

time

tem

pera

ture

Melting

melting plateau

time

Freezing

freezing plateau

supercooling and recovery

tem

pera

ture

Page 30: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 30

Nucleation in pure metal

Gibbs free energy change, ∆G

Critical value to solidify

Liquid Liquid

Solid

freezing

Energy G1 G2 = G1 + ∆G

SLv

SLSLvs

rGr

AGVG

γππ

γ

23 434

+∆−=

+∆−=∆

S,L: solid, liquid V: volume A : surface area γ : surface energy r : radius of solid Lv : latent heat ∆T : undercooling

m

v

Sv

Lvv

TTL

GGG∆

=

−=∆

TLTr

v

mSL

=

12* γ22

23*

)(1

316

TLTG

v

mSL

=∆

πγ

Page 31: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 31

2.3 Errors in Use of Thermometers

Thermometer indicates the temperature of a system.

In many cases, perfect measurement is not possible. No thermal equilibrium between thermometer and system Insertion of thermometer disturbs the equilibrium.

Possible and common errors Immersion errors Heat capacity errors Settling response errors Lag errors with steadily changing temperature Radiation errors

Page 32: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 32

A. Immersion errors

Thermometer stem, sheath and lead wires are acting as path for a continuous heat flow.

Heat absorbed by thermometer Heat lost from thermometer

Temperature profile along thermometer stem

A simple model for error

)exp()(eff

sysambm DLKTTT −

−=∆

• Tsys : Temperature of system • Tamb : Temperature of ambient • L : depth of immersion of sensor • Deff: effective diameter of thermometer • K : constant (~ 1)

Page 33: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 33

Relative immersion error

For 1 % accuracy to 5 diameters + sensor

length For 0.01 % accuracy

to 10 diameters + sensor length

For 0.0001 % accuracy, to 15 diameters + sensor

length Highest level using fixed-

point measurement

Immersion (diameter)

For K = 1

Rel

ativ

e te

mpe

ratu

re e

rror

(%)

Page 34: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 34

B. Heat capacity errors

If a thermometer is immersed into system, the temperature of system should be changed to lower or higher temperature.

This is due to heat flow to (from) thermometer from (to) system. In adiabatic condition (there is no heat flow !),

)( sTT

CCCTT ini

ts

tsmeasured −

++=

system

Ts, Cs

Tini, Ct

Tmeasured

equilibrium

• Tmeasured : Measured temperature • Ts : Temperature of system • Tini : Initial temperature of thermometer • Cs, Ct : heat capacity of system and thermometer

Page 35: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 35

C. Settling response error

In practical cases, for control system, it will take time to replace heat change of thermometer.

If insufficient time is allowed, error due to response will occur.

Time

Tem

pera

ture

1/e

−−=∆

0s exp)(

ττTTT inim

• ∆Tm : temperature error • Ts : Initial temperature of system • Tini : Initial temperature of thermometer • τ : time • τ0 : 1/e time constant

Page 36: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 36

Relative error

For 1 % accuracy industrial Wait 5 τ0

For 0.01 % accuracy laboratory Wait 10 τ0

For 0.0001 % accuracy, Standard lab Wait 15 τ0

Time (units of τ0)

Perc

enta

ge re

lativ

e te

mpe

ratu

re e

rror

Page 37: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 37

Part II. Thermocouple Thermometry

1. Thermoelectric Effects

2. Type and Features of Thermocouples

3. Measurement Systems

4. Errors and Usage

5. Calibration and Uncertainty

Page 38: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 38

1. Thermoelectric Effects Seebeck effect

Temperature difference ⇒ Electric power Peltier effect

Electric power ⇒ Temperature difference Thomson effect

Combine of above two effects

Page 39: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 39

1.1 Seebeck effects

In 1821, T.J.Seebeck found

Hot Cold current

A

B

A and B are two different metallic wires.

Page 40: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 40

Basic principle

For a single conductor under the temperature gradient Th side is in higher thermal energy state than Tc. So, electrons in Th side move toward Tc side. Then, number of electrons in Tc side is larger than those in Th

side. It means a non-equilibrium state. Finally, there is a driving force for the movement of electrons

in Tc side toward Th side. This is the thermoelectric voltage, in other words, Seebeck

voltage.

Th Tc

Page 41: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 41

Temperature coefficient

Seebeck coefficient, S (voltage per oC) E depends on the material and temperature gradient.

Th Tc E

tES

t ∆=

=∆ 0lim

Page 42: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 42

For a specific material Temperature is an intrinsic property, so it is continuous.

Th Tc E

∫= dttSE )(

Page 43: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 43

Thermocouple itself is….batteries !

A series of batteries which is operated using temperature gradient.

Tem

pera

ture

Position

Page 44: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 44

Circuit analysis

Two different conducting wires Single conductor can not be used as a thermocouple.

STdtSS

dtSdtS

EEE

T

TBA

T

TB

T

TA

BAnet

∆⋅∆=−=

+=

+=

∫∫1

0

0

1

1

0

)(

T1 T0 Enet

EA

EB

Page 45: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 45

Same wires are connected to the circuit.

STdtSS

dtSdtSdtSdtS

EEEEE

T

TBA

T

TC

T

TB

T

TA

T

TC

CBACnet

∆⋅∆=−=

+++=

+++=

∫∫∫∫2

1

0

1

1

2

2

1

1

0

)(

If T1 = zero ?

T2 T0 Enet

EA

EB

T1

EC

EC

Page 46: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 46

Some part is damaged.

∫∫∫

∫∫∫∫∫∫

−+−+−=

+++++=

++=

3

2

2

1

1

0

0

1

1

2

2

3

3

2

2

1

1

0

)()()( '

'

'

T

TBA

T

TBA

T

TBA

T

TB

T

TB

T

TB

T

TA

T

TA

T

TA

BAAnet

dtSSdtSSdtSS

dtSdtSdtSdtSdtSdtS

EEEE

If T1 = T2 ?

EB

T3 T0 Enet

EA

T1

EA’

T2

Let SA’ = SA + ∆S

∫∫

∫∫∫

∆+−=

−+−∆++−=

2

1

3

0

3

2

2

1

1

0

)()(

)()()(

T

TAB

T

TBA

T

TBA

T

TBABA

T

TBAnet

dtSdtSS

dtSSdtSSSdtSSE

Page 47: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 47

Ideal vs Practical

For ideal and homogeneous wires E only depends on the temperature gradient and Seebeck

coefficients.

For practical thermocouples E = f(t, S, x)

t : temperature S : Seebeck coefficient x : position

Due to the thermoelectric inhomogeneity Epractical = Ehomo + Einhomo

Page 48: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 48

Thermoelectric inhomogeneity

Caused from the factors affecting the Fermi energy level of material Composition change

Oxidation or evaporation

Structural change

Defects

Plastic or Elastic deformation

Produced in the local area

No temperature gradient, No effects !

Page 49: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 49

Calibration uncertainty by KRISS, Type S

Type S

TC

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Unc

ertIa

inty

/o C

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6Ref TCOther factorsInhomogeneityCombined

Page 50: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 50

Calibration uncertainty by KRISS, Type R

Type R

TC

0 1 2 3 4

Unc

erta

inty

/o C

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Ref TCInhomogeneityOther factorsCombined

Page 51: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 51

Type B

TC

0 1 2 3

Unc

erta

inty

/o C

0

1

2

3

4

5

6Ref TCInhomogeneityOther factorsCombined

Calibration uncertainty by KRISS, Type S

Page 52: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 52

Change of inhomogeneity with temperature

Type S / R t/c

Little dependence on temperature

within ± 0.01 %

2002 Temperature Symposium by M. Ballico

Possible to estimate inhomogeneity at whole

temperature range.

Page 53: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 53

KRISS Inhomogeneity Test System

Vertical Liquid bath Operation temperature : 180

oC ~ 200 oC Maximum immersion depth of

43 cm Stepping motor driven by

computer Bath temperature is monitored

by F250 thermometer. Emf is measured using

Keithley 2000 DMM. Ice point as reference

temperature TCs are protected using quartz

tubes.

Motor

TCs

Bath

DMM

Thermometer

Motor controller

Control PC

Ice bath

Page 54: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 54

Example 1, Type S thermocouple Type S

Immersion depth /mm

0 100 200 300 400 500

Emf d

iffer

ence

(Em -

E 180

o C) /

µV

-140

-120

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

0 100 200 300 400-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

∆E = 1.8 µV

%159.0

%1006.1423.1273

8.1

%100 ityInhomogeneC25C180 oo

=

×−

=

×−

∆=

EEE

Uncertainty at 1100 oC due to inhomogeneity (Rectangular distribution)

C0.42μV94.4

32/)5.1075600159.0(

o=

=

×=

Page 55: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 55

Type B

Immersion depth /mm

0 100 200 300 400 500

Emf d

iffer

ence

(Em -

E 180

o C) /

µV

-14

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

∆E = 2.2 µV

%56.1

%1003.05.140

2.2

%100 ityInhomogeneC25C180 oo

=

×+

=

×−

∆=

EEE

Example 2, Type B thermocouple

C93.3μV5.45

32/)1.100990156.0(

o=

=

×=Uncertainty at 1500 oC due to inhomogeneity

(Rectangular distribution)

Page 56: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 56

Dependency of inhomogeneity in KRISS

Type Combined Uncertainty

/oC Uncertainty from

Inhomogeneity /oC Dependency

B 3.45 2.87 83 %

B 3.91 3.42 86 %

S 0.47 0.44 93 %

S 0.40 0.36 90 %

S 0.49 0.46 93 %

S 0.53 0.50 94 %

Page 57: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 57

2. Type and Features of thermocouples Letter-designated Noble metal thermocouples Base metal thermocouples

Non letter-designated Pure metal thermocouples W/Re thermocouples Others

Page 58: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 58

2.1 Thermocouple Types

Temperature (oC)

-250 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000

EMF

(mV)

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

E

J

T

KN

RS B

Temperature vs. Emf relation of commercial thermocouples

Page 59: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 59

2.2 Features of Thermocouples

Type Composition

Properties + -

S R B

Pt90Rh10

Pt87Rh13

Pt70Rh30

Pt Pt Pt94Rh6

Most stable in air. S and R can be used to 1450 oC, B is to 1700 oC. Very sensitive to the metallic impurities. Should not be used in vacuum without protecting tube.

K Ni90Cr10

(Chromel) Ni95(Mn,Al,Si)5

(Alumel)

Most well-known thermocouple. In air or inert atmosphere. Severe degradation at high temperature

N Ni84.5Cr14.2Si1.3

(Nicrosil) Ni95.5(Si,Mg)4.5

(Nisil)

Alternative to the type K Enhance the high temperature stability Newest developed one

T J E

Cu Fe Ni90Cr10

Cu55Ni45

(Constantan)

T is usually used in low temperature range, below 0 oC. J and E are rarely used.

Page 60: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 60

Non Letter-designated

Type Composition

Properties + -

Au/Pt Pt/Pd Au/Pd

Au Pt Au

Pt Pd Pd

Very high purity wires (5N up) Strong resistance to the composition change Most stable and accurate thermocouples

W3Re/W25Re W97Re3 W75Re25 Up to 2300 oC Specially designed ones for very high temperature. Only for inert, vacuum or hydrogen atmosphere W5Re/W26Re W95Re5 W74Re26

More than several hundreds of thermocouples

Page 61: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 61

3. Measurement Systems

Thermocouple probe Reference junction Insulator and protecting tube Compensating wire

Readout

Page 62: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 62

3.1 Thermocouple Probe

Sheath vs. Unsheathed Quick connector

Reference thermocouple

Page 63: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 63

Color codes

Page 64: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 64

3.2 Reference junction

Silicon oil

J Cold junction

Stability of ± 5 mK

Page 65: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 65

3.3 Protecting tube

Temperature

Strength

Surrounding atmosphere

Material composition of protecting tube

Chemical composition of environment

For base metal TCs, metallic tube

For noble metal TCs, ceramic tube

Page 66: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 66

Some insulators

Page 67: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 67

3.4 Compensating wire

Economic point of view For noble metal thermocouples

Composition Type

+ - Temperature error

B S, R

K J E T N

Copper Copper Chromel Iron Chromel Copper Nicrosil

Copper Copper Alloy Alumel Constantan Constantan Constantan Nisil

0 ~100 0 ~ 200 0 ~ 200 0 ~ 200 0 ~ 200

-60 ~ 100 0 ~ 200

0 ± 5.0 ± 2.2 ± 2.2 ± 1.7 ± 1.0 ± 2.2

Page 68: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 68

3.5 Readouts

Digital volt(multi)meters (0.1 µV resolution) Digital indicators (with internal reference

Junction)

Page 69: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 69

4. Errors and Usage

Error tree of thermocouple

Page 70: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 70

4.1 Composition change at high temperature

•Type S, 1400 oC, 1440 h

•SEM image

Negative : 95% Pt + 5% Rh

(originally 100 % Pt)

Negative leg

Positive leg

Page 71: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 71

4.2 Thermocouples in different atmosphere

Type Gas Time /h Temperature change Result

Argon 10,000 - 19 ~ -28 K Completed Vacuum 1,610 - 1.5 K Failed R

Air 10,000 - 4.9 K Completed Argon 10,000 - 7 ~ - 18 K Completed

B Vacuum 2,780 - 3.2 K Failed

Test temperature: 1600 K

Page 72: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 72

4.3 Effects of microstructual change of type K

•Chromel : Short-range ordering of Cr between 200 oC ~ 600 oC

•Increase of emf due to short-range ordering

Chromel

Alumel

Net emf

Page 73: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 73

4.4 Effects of protecting materials

•Thermocouples in various protecting tubes at about 1000 oC

•Type S in Pt10Rh, Pt20Rh, Inconel, S.steel

•Type B in Inconel and S.steel

Page 74: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 74

4.5 Annealing treatments

•Standard annealing -1450 oC, 1 h -1100 oC, 10 h

•Emfannealed-Emfas-received

• ~ 2 oC difference

Temperature /oC0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

Tem

p. D

iff /K

0

1

2

3

Page 75: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 75

4.6 Inhomogeneity of type K and N 1/4", IN Sheath, Type K, Grounded junction

Immersion depth /mm

0 100 200 300 400 500

Tem

pera

ture

/o C

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

1000 h600 h300 hAs-received

48 oC

1/4", IN Sheath, Type N, Grounded junction

Immersion depth /mm

0 100 200 300 400 500

Tem

pera

ture

/o C

172

174

176

178

180

182

1000 h600 h300 hAs-received

• 1000 oC annealing treatment with time • Type K: inhomogeneous temperature variation of about 48 oC • Type N: very small change ( ~ 1 oC)

Page 76: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 76

5. Calibration and Uncertainty

Calibration method Procedures of comparison calibration Uncertainty of calibration

Page 77: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 77

5.1 Calibration method

Fixed-point method At the defining fixed-points by ITS-90

Comparison method Compare with the standard (reference)

Page 78: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 78

5.1.1 Fixed-point method

Most accurate method

Pd

TC wire

PtPd thermocouple at Cu Point (1084.62 oC)

Time /h.min 15:40 16:00 16:20 16:40

Emf /

µV

13242

13243

13244

13245

13246

13247

Standard deviation: ± 0.02 µV (=1 mK)

0.05 oC

Freezing cell Typical freezing curve

Page 79: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 79

Calibration uncertainty of thermocouple

Temperature/oC Expanded uncertainty (k=2)

Au/Pt Pt/Pd S, R, B

231.928 (Sn) 0.02 oC 0.03 oC 0.04 oC

419.527 (Zn) 0.02 oC 0.03 oC 0.05 oC

660.323 (Al) 0.03 oC 0.03 oC 0.06 oC

961.78 (Ag) 0.03 oC 0.04 oC 0.08 oC

1084.62 (Cu) - 0.05 oC 0.09 oC

1154 (Fe/C) - 0.15 oC 0.2 oC

1324 (Co/C) - 0.65 oC 0.65 oC

1554.8 (Pd) - - 0.8 oC

Page 80: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 80

Most common method Compare with Reference thermometer in

furnace or liquid-bath PRT s Thermocouples Liquid-in glass thermometers Bi-metal etc.

5.1.2 Comparison calibration

Page 81: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 81

Calibration uncertainty by comparison calibration

Sensors Temperature range Expanded uncertainty (k=2)

S, R, B 0 oC ~ 1100 oC 0.2 oC

1100 oC ~ 1554 oC 2.0 oC

IPRT

-80 oC ~ 0 oC 16 mK

0 oC ~ 250 oC 16 mK

250 oC ~ 550 oC 20 mK

Page 82: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 82

Type of calibration

Single point At a specific temperature

Temperature vs. temperature (or emf)

Multiple points Point to point calculation

Make a result at each calibration temperature Continuous calculation

Make a result with finite temperature interval Normally, interpolation used Above the maximum point, extrapolation applied

It is very general to calculate the deviation emf. It is used to minimize the interpolation error. Deviation emf = Measured emf – Standard emf Standard emf is from the reference table (ASTM E230, IEC 584-1)

Page 83: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 83

5.2 Procedures of comparison calibration

Inspect the test item

Place the reference standard and test item into the temperature enclosure

Set the temperature enclosure to specified temperature

Confirm the temperature stable

Read the indications from reference and test item

Repeat

Page 84: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 84

• Step 1 : Visual inspection

Page 85: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 85

• Step 2 : Dismentle

Page 86: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 86

• Step 3 : Cleaning

Page 87: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 87

• Step 4 : First heat treatment

Page 88: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 88

• Step 5 : Wire insertion

Page 89: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 89

• Step 6 : Re-assemble

Page 90: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 90

• Step 7 : Making hot junction

Page 91: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 91

• Step 8 : Second heat treatment

Page 92: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 92

• Step 9 : Ice point preparation

Page 93: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 93

• Step 10 : Installing pyrex tubes for ice point

Page 94: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 94

Weld the hot junctions Or, use the temperature

equalizing block made of Pt Install at the uniform

temperature zone

Welding

Pt block

Installation of thermocouples

Page 95: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 95

From low to high temperature Measure if temperature change is below (0.05 ~ 0.1)

oC/min Repeat 10 times at each point About interval of 100 oC ~ 200 oC is suitable.

Measurement procedures

Page 96: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 96

∆E = (Ex – Es)+ ∆Efit

∆E : deviation emf Ex : DUT emf Er : standard emf ∆Efit :interpolation fit

correction

Example of interpolation fit of the deviation emf

Plot the deviation emf with temperature

Temperature /oC

200 400 600 800 1000 1200

Dev

iatio

n E

mf /

µV

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

∆Ei = Ex - Er

∆Efit

∆E(=a0+a1t+a2t2+a3t3)

Page 97: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 97

E’ = E + ∆E

= (c0 + c1t + ….+ c8t8) + a0+a1t+a2t2+a3t3

= ( c0+a0) + (c1+a1)t + (c2+a2)t2 + (c3+a3)t3

+ c4t4 + …. + c8t8

Making a new reference function

Page 98: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 98

5.3 Uncertainty of calibration

Comparison with reference thermocouple Normally Pt/Rh-based noble thermocouples are

used as reference thermometer. Au/Pt or Pt/Pd can be used as higher grade

standards.

Page 99: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 99

5.3.1 Measurement equation

Ed = (Ex – Es) + ∆Efit (1)

Ed : Deviation emf /µV Ex : Measured emf of DUT /µV Es : Standard emf of DUT /µV ∆Efit : Correction due to interpolation /µV

Page 100: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 100

Measured emf of DUT

Ex = Em,x + ∆Eex + ∆Ert,x (2)

Em,x : Read emf of DUT ∆Eex : Correction due to compensation(extension) wire ∆Ert,x : Correction due to room temperature

compensation

Page 101: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 101

Standard emf of DUT

Es = f(tr) (3)

tr = g(Em,r + ∆Ert,r) (4)

tr : Reference temperature from the certificate of reference thermocouple /oC

f(tr) : Standard emf from the IEC table Em,r : Measured emf of reference thermocouple ∆Ert,r : Correction due to room temperature compensation

Page 102: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 102

Combined Standard Uncertainty

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

α : Coefficient of voltage with temperature, µV/oC β : Reverse of α, oC/µV

)()()()( 222fitsxdc EuEuEuEu ∆++=

)()()()( ,22

,2

xrtexxmx EuEuEuEu ∆+∆+=

)()()( 222rs tufuEu α+=

)()()()( ,22

,222

rrtrmr EuEugutu ∆++= ββ

Page 103: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 103

5.3.2 Example of Comparison

Reference(REF): type R, DUT: type S Calibration at 8 points (230 oC, 500 oC, 600 oC, 700 oC, 800 oC, 890 oC, 980

oC, 1060 oC) 10 measurements at each point Calibration uncertainty and long term stability of REF are 0.4 oC (k =2) and ±

0.1 oC. Calibration uncertainty and long term stability of DVM(Res. 0.1 µV) are 10

µV/V (k = 2) and ± 20 µV/V. The accuracy of selector switch is ± 0.5 µV, and extension wires are not used. Two thermocouples are welded at their measuring junction. The stability of ice point (water and ice mixture) is ± 0.05 oC. The inhomogeneity of DUT at 180 oC is ± 0.078 %. The maximum deviation of interpolation is 0.15 µV. The combined standard uncertainties are calculated at each point. In this case, we calculate the uncertainty at 1060 oC.

Page 104: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 104

Results of calibration

Cal. point (℃)

Reference thermocouple DUT Standard emf from IEC table

/㎶

Deviation emf /㎶ Average

/㎶ Temperature

/℃

Standard deviation

/㎶

Average /㎶

Standard deviation

/㎶

230 1 887.30 246.25 0.21 1 840.62 0.18 1839.26 1.36

500 4 465.73 499.37 0.23 4 230.18 0.27 4225.86 4.32

600 5 578.02 599.26 0.31 5 235.63 0.39 5229.98 5.65

700 6 745.01 699.80 0.24 6 279.13 0.24 6271.93 7.20

800 7 955.13 799.91 0.35 7 351.66 0.36 7342.8 8.86

890 9 217.93 900.40 0.42 8 462.70 0.40 8452.49 10.21

980 10 258.31 980.54 0.46 9 372.94 0.45 9361.89 11.05

1 060 11 328.53 1 060.84 0.58 10 304.97 0.69 10293.77 11.20

Page 105: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 105

5.3.3 Standard uncertainty of DUT, u(Ex)

Standard uncertainty of emf measurement, u(Em,x)

u(EVD,x): Resolution of DVM u(EVC,x): Calibration uncertainty of DVM u(EVL,x): Long-term stability of DVM u(ERe,x): Repeatability of measurement u(ESC,x): Accuracy of selector switch u(EEN,x): Electrical noise u(EIH): Inhomogeneity of DUT u(thj): Tip temperature difference due to temperature gradient

)()()()(

)()()()()(222

,2

,2

Re,2

,2

,2

,2

,2

hjIHxENxSC

xxVLxVCxVDxm

tuEuEuEu

EuEuEuEuEu

α++++

+++=

Page 106: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 106

Standard uncertainty of compensation wire, u(∆Eex) In case of using compensating or extension wires Correction through the measurement of

temperature of connecting point/ Or apply the specification Direct measurement : - 2.3 µV ± 0.3 µV u(∆Eex) = 0.15 µV

Using the specification

In this case, it is not used.

35)( CEu

o

ex ×=∆ α

Page 107: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 107

Standard uncertainty of room temperature compensation, u(∆Ert,x)

Factor due to the change of reference point

Usually, use the ice temperature (0 oC)

Apply the rectangular distribution

In this case, it is ± 0.05 oC.

C

CEu

o

o

xrt

029.03

05.0)( ,

=

=∆V

CVCyu ooi

µµ

16.0/40.5029.0)(

=×=

Apply the sensitivity coefficient of type S at 0 oC

Page 108: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 108

5.3.4 Standard uncertainty of REF, u(Es)

Standard uncertainty of IEC table, u(f) Internationally approved value, so it is zero.

Uncertainty reference temperature, u(tr) From the calibration certificate of reference

thermocouple tr = g(Em,r + ∆Ert,r)

Page 109: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 109

5.3.4.1 Uncertainty of reference temperature, u(g)

Certificate of reference thermocouple

Normal distribution

In this case, it is 0.4 oC (k = 2). Cgu o2.0)( =

Page 110: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 110

5.3.4.2 Uncertainty of reference temperature, u(tr)

Standard uncertainty of emf measurement, u(Em,r)

u(EVD,r): Resolution of DVM u(EVC,r): Calibration uncertainty of DVM u(EVL,r): Long-term stability of DVM u(ERe,r): Repeatability of measurement u(ESC,r): Accuracy of selector switch u(EEN,r): Electrical noise u(tLS): Long-term stability of reference thermocouple

)()()(

)()()()()(22

,2

,2

Re,2

,2

,2

,2

,2

LSrENrSC

rrVLrVCrVDrm

tuEuEu

EuEuEuEuEu

α+++

+++=

Page 111: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 111

Room temperature compensation, u(∆Ert,r)

In this case, it is ± 0.05 oC.

C

Ctu

o

o

hj

029.03

05.0)(

=

=

CCVCVCyu

o

o

oo

i

011.0/48.13/29.5029.0)(

=

×=µµ

Coefficients at ice point and 1060 oC are different each other.

Apply the coefficient of type R thermocouple at each temperature

Note

Page 112: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 112

5.3.5 Interpolation, u(∆Efit)

Uncertainty due to curve fit to get a deviation function Apply the maximum difference between the

measured and fitted value Apply the rectangular distribution

Apply the maximum difference as the half width of distribution

In this case, it is 0.15 µV. VVEu fit µµ 09.0

315.0)( ==∆

Page 113: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 113

5.3.6 Combined Standard Uncertainty – uc(Ed)

V

V

EuEuEuEu fitsxdc

µµ

33.509.056.267.4

)()()()(222

222

=++=

∆++=

VV

EuEuEuEu xrtexxmx

µµ

67.416.00.067.4

)()()()(222

,22

,2

=++=

∆+∆+=

VV

tufuEu rs

µµ

α

56.2218.073.110

)()()(22

222

=×+=

+=

CC

EuEugutu

o

o

rrtrmr

218.0029.0392.001.1074.02.0

)()()()(22222

,22

,222

=

×+×+=

∆++= ββ

Note ! Sensitivity of DUT

Page 114: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 114

5.3.7 Uncertainty budget – u(Ex)

Quantity Xi

Estimated xi

Std. uncertainty

u(xi)

Sensitivity coefficient

ci

Uncertainty ui(y)

Distribution Deg.

Freedom

Ex 10304.97 ㎶ 4.676 ㎶ 1 4.67 ㎶ Normal ∞

Em,x 10304.97 ㎶ 4.67 ㎶ 1 4.67 ㎶ Normal ∞

EVD,x - 0.03 ㎶ 1 0.03 ㎶ Rectang. ∞

EVC,x - 0.05 ㎶ 1 0.05 ㎶ Normal ∞

EVL,x - 0.12 ㎶ 1 0.12 ㎶ Rectang. ∞

ERe,x - 0.22 ㎶ 1 0.22 ㎶ Normal 9

ESC,x - 0.58 ㎶ 1 0.58 ㎶ Rectang. ∞

EEN,x - 0.58 ㎶ 1 0.58 ㎶ Rectang. ∞

EIH - 4.58 ㎶ 1 4.58 ㎶ Rectang. ∞

thj - 0.058 ℃ 11.73 ㎶/℃ 0.68 ㎶ Rectang. ∞

∆Eex 0 ㎶ 0 ㎶ 1 0 ㎶ Rectang. ∞

∆Ert,x 0 ㎶ 0.029 ℃ 5.40 ㎶/℃ 0.16 ㎶ Rectang. ∞

Page 115: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 115

Uncertainty budget – u(Es), u(∆Efit) Quantity

Xi

Estimated xi

Std. uncertainty

u(xi)

Sensitivity coefficient

ci

Uncertainty ui(y)

Distribution Deg. Freedom

Es 10 293.77 ㎶ 2.56 ㎶ 1 2.56 ㎶ Normal ∞

f(tr) - 0 1 0 - ∞

tr - 0.218 oC 11.73 ㎶/℃ 2.56 ㎶ Normal ∞

g(tr) - 0.2 oC 1 0.2 oC Normal ∞

Em,r - 1.16 ㎶ 0.074 oC/ ㎶ 0.086 oC Normal ∞

EVD,r - 0.03 ㎶ 1 0.03 ㎶ Rectang. ∞

EVC,r - 0.06 ㎶ 1 0.06 ㎶ Normal ∞

EVL,r - 0.13 ㎶ 1 0.13 ㎶ Rectang. ∞

ERe,r - 0.18 ㎶ 1 0.18 ㎶ Normal 9

ESC,r - 0.58 ㎶ 1 0.58 ㎶ Rectang. ∞

EEN,r - 0.58 ㎶ 1 0.58 ㎶ Rectang. ∞

tLS - 0.058 ℃ 13.48 ㎶/℃ 0.78 ㎶ Rectang. ∞

∆Ert,r 0 ㎶ 0.029 ℃ 0.392 0.011 oC Rectang. ∞

∆Efit 0.14 ㎶ 0.09 ㎶ 1 0.09 ㎶ Rectang. ∞

Page 116: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 116

5.3.8 Uncertainty with temperature

Calibration point /℃

Combined standard uncertainty /㎶

Expanded uncertainty (k = 2)

/㎶

Expanded uncertainty (k = 2)

/℃

246.25 2.55 5.10 0.58

499.37 3.19 6.38 0.64

599.26 3.51 7.02 0.69

699.80 3.87 7.74 0.73

799.91 4.27 8.54 0.79

900.40 4.70 9.40 0.84

980.54 5.07 10.14 0.88

1 060.84 5.33 10.66 0.91

Page 117: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 117

5.3.9 Report of uncertainty

Choose the maximum uncertainty among the calculated

values

Expanded uncertainty is determined with k = 2.

In this case, U95 = 0.9 oC

Page 118: Workshop Thermocouple

Better Standards, Better Life 118

Further reading T.D. McGee, “Principles and methods of temperature measurement”,

1988, John Wiley & Sons J.V.Nicholas and D.R.white, “Traceable Temperatures”, 2nd edition,

2001, John Wiley & Sons “Manual on the use of thermocouples in temperature measurement”, 4th

edition, 1993, ASTM