WKB Report

download WKB Report

of 6

Transcript of WKB Report

  • 7/28/2019 WKB Report

    1/6

    Cody Arceneaux

    Quantum Mechanics II

    The Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin (WKB) approximation is a method of finding

    approximate solutions of linear, second order differential equations. It was originally developed

    by Liouville and Green, and is sometimes referred to as the Liouville-Green (LG) approximation.

    Also, because of the work by Jeffereys before Wentzel, Kramers, and Brillouin, it is sometimes

    referred to as the WKBJ or the JWKB approximation.

    1

    In quantum mechanics, the WKB approximation is used to find a semi-classical solution

    to the Schrodinger equation. The time-dependent version of the Schrodinger equation is

    ).4 (1)This is one of the more general problems that would need to be solved. A more simplified

    explanation can be used to get the idea before moving on to a more generalized case.

    The explanation of the WKB approximation in Griffiths (2005)2

    and Shankar (1994)3

    begins with a particle in one-dimension of energy E in a constant potential V. The Schrodinger

    equation is used in the form of

    * ( ) + . (2)For simplicity, letp(x) = . Then, use as a wavefunction

    (3)

    and insert this into Eq. 2 to get

    . (4)(x) needs to be expanded into a power series for

    (x) = 0 + 1+ 2 + . (5)For the WKB approximation, terms of order2or higher will be discarded. The expansion is

    placed into the above equation, and (after taking derivatives and performing some algebra) it

    ends up as 0= p(x). Taking the integral of this and placing it back into wavefunction resultsin

  • 7/28/2019 WKB Report

    2/6

    Cody Arceneaux

    Quantum Mechanics II

    (6)which is the WKB approximation for the one-dimensional time-independent Schrodinger

    equation.

    2,3

    Sakurai (1994)4, though, goes through a derivation that is time-dependent and draws

    heavily on Hamiltonian dynamics. In this derivation, let

    (7)where | |2. Putting this through the time-dependent Schrodinger equation resultsin

    [() || ] (8)

    For the WKB approximation, Eq. 8 and has all terms of order or higher removed because it isso small. The real part of Eq. 8 is then

    ||

    , (9)and this equivalent to the Hamilton-Jacobi theorem with S(x,t) is Hamiltons principle function.

    This can be easily recognized from almost any book on classical mechanics, such as Fetter and

    Walecka (2005, pp. 185-186, 189)5. With a constant Hamiltonian, S(x,t) can be separated as

    (10)where W(x) is Hamiltons characteristic function. The solution of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation

    is

    = . (11)Looking at the imaginary part of Eq. 8 and using the fact that for a stationary state

    it isfound that

    () . (12)

  • 7/28/2019 WKB Report

    3/6

    Cody Arceneaux

    Quantum Mechanics II

    This means that is a constant. Taking that fact and rearranging terms leads to

    . (13)

    with C a constant. Combing all of this together results in

    (14)which is a time-dependent WKB approximation. This will only work in the case of

    | | | |(15)

    Eq. 15 used with the de Broglie wavelength leads to

    | | (16)which shows that the WKB approximation only works for small wavelengths.

    This explanation works for the classically allowed region where E>V, but it does not

    work in the classically (but not quantum) forbidden region where V>E. This can be found easily

    enough by replacingE-V(x) in Eq. 14 and ends up being

    (17)Neither the V>Ecase or theE>Vcase are able to explain the turning points whenE=V.

    4

    Figure 1 illustrates where the turning points are.

  • 7/28/2019 WKB Report

    4/6

    Cody Arceneaux

    Quantum Mechanics II

    Fig. 1: V, E, and the turning points x1 and x2

    Brack and Bhaduri (2003)6

    specifically point out that for Figure 1, the approximated

    wavefunction in the central region is

    (18)

    in the region on the right is

    (19)

    and in the region on the left is

    (20)To solve this, the solutions need to be combined at the turning points, and a patch

    wavefunction will be used at the turning points. This patching wavefunction ends up being an

    Airy function.6

    The integration constants for the two WKB approximation wavefunctions need

    to be matched to the Airy function. When this is done, Eq. 19 (without the time dependence)goes to

    (21)and Eq. 20 (without the time dependence) goes to

  • 7/28/2019 WKB Report

    5/6

    Cody Arceneaux

    Quantum Mechanics II

    ()

    (22)

    Looking at Eq. 21 and Eq. 22, it is apparent that they differ by an integer multiple of. It can bediscerned that ()

    4,6 (23)

    which is often used to approximate the quantized energy of various systems.

    The WKB approximation has a more general use to solve non-quantum problems. If the

    highest order derivative of a differential equation is multiplied by a small number (in thesolution of the Schrodinger equation, this is ), following steps similar to the derivationspresented here will find the WKB approximation of that problem. In that sense, it is a useful tool

    across numerous fields.7

  • 7/28/2019 WKB Report

    6/6

    Cody Arceneaux

    Quantum Mechanics II

    References

    1Spigler, Renato and Vianello, Marco (1998). "A Survey on the LiouvilleGreen (WKB)

    approximation for linear difference equations of the second order". In Elaydi, Saber;

    Gyri, I.; and Ladas, G. E. Advances in difference equations: proceedings of the SecondInternational Conference on Difference Equations : Veszprm, Hungary, August 711,

    1995. CRC Press.

    2Griffiths, David J. (2005). Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, Second Edition. Upper Saddle

    River: Pearson Education, Inc.

    3Shankar, R. (1994). Principles of Quantum Mechanics, Second Edition. New York: Plenum

    Press.

    4Sakurai, J.J. and Tuan, San Fu, ed. (1994). Modern Quantum Mechanics, Revised Edition.Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.

    5Fetter, Alexander L. and Walecka, John Dirk. (2003). Theoretical Mechanics of Particles and

    Continua. Mineola: Dover Publications, Inc.

    6Brack, Matthias and Bhaduri, Rajat K. (2003). Semiclassical Physics. Boulder: Westview

    Press.

    7Bender, Carl M. and Orszag, Steven A. (1999). Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists

    and Engineers. New York: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

    http://books.google.com/?id=a36iXw5_VzcC&pg=PA567&dq=Liouville-Green+WKBJ+WKB+LGhttp://books.google.com/?id=a36iXw5_VzcC&pg=PA567&dq=Liouville-Green+WKBJ+WKB+LGhttp://books.google.com/?id=a36iXw5_VzcC&pg=PA567&dq=Liouville-Green+WKBJ+WKB+LGhttp://books.google.com/?id=a36iXw5_VzcC&pg=PA567&dq=Liouville-Green+WKBJ+WKB+LGhttp://books.google.com/?id=a36iXw5_VzcC&pg=PA567&dq=Liouville-Green+WKBJ+WKB+LGhttp://books.google.com/?id=a36iXw5_VzcC&pg=PA567&dq=Liouville-Green+WKBJ+WKB+LG