Wind Turbine Design and Feasibility Report 2

download Wind Turbine Design and Feasibility Report 2

of 13

Transcript of Wind Turbine Design and Feasibility Report 2

  • 8/9/2019 Wind Turbine Design and Feasibility Report 2

    1/13

    (1)

    DESIGN OF A WIND TURBINE

    Abstract

    The project in hand deals with the designing, feasibility and cost

    effectiveness study of a wind turbine which may preferably be installed at

    agricultural farms and open areas where there are no major hindrances to

    the wind current or tower height limitations. This type of wind turbine

    system is used to fulfill the local electricity power requirements of the site.

    The project is done by three students and each students report emphasizes

    on a particular area in addition to the overall design brief. In this report, the

    detailed discussion on types of wind turbines as well as the detailed design

    of turbine blade is discussed.

    PLANNING AND ORGANIZING YOUR PROJECT

    The goal of the project is to come up with an optimum design of wind

    turbine which is suitable for the power requirements of an average

    agricultural form in USA in particular and worldwide in general. Following

    breakdown was selected to achieve the objectives:

    (a) Selection of wind turbine type(b) Selecting Vital parameters of the system based on requirement and

    cost comparison

    (c) Finalizing the details of(i) Blade design(ii) Gearbox design(iii) Yaw and steering system(iv) Transmission system(v) Number of blades(vi) Generator(vii) Tower(viii) Hydraulic System(ix) Brake System

    (d) Making performance and cost comparison

  • 8/9/2019 Wind Turbine Design and Feasibility Report 2

    2/13

    (2)

    (e) Incorporating safeties in design(f) Estimating the cost of project

    THE ITERATIVE NATURE OF DESIGN

    Selection of Type of Wind Turbine

    There are two basic types of turbines: -

    Drag Type Turbines These are the types of turbine which are sent into

    motion due to the drag effect of the media (either air or water). Figure No 1

    and 2 shows some basic shapes and arrangements for drag type turbines.

    These turbines were mostly used in the early history in Persia and China.

    These may be classified as:

    (i) Persian Windmill(ii) Chinese Windmill(iii) Saviounus

    Figure No 1 Different types of Drag Type Wind Turbines

  • 8/9/2019 Wind Turbine Design and Feasibility Report 2

    3/13

    (3)

    (b) Lift Type Turbines These types of turbines have airfoil typegeometry of blades and use the concept of lift generation to extract

    energy from air. These wind turbines are most common now a

    days. Followings are the subcategories of these turbines.

    (i) Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine (HAWT) This is themost common type of wind turbine. These have their main rotor

    shaft and electrical generator at the top of a tower. These rotor

    must be pointed into the wind.

    (ii) Vertical Axis Wind Turbine (VAWT) In this type, themain rotor shaft is installed vertically. The blades need not be

    steered to keep in wind direction.

    Figure No 2 Different Arrangements in Drag Type Wind Turbines

    HAWTs

    Disadvantage The greatest design complexity faced in case of

    Horizontal axis wind turbines (HAWT) is that these must be pointed into the

    wind in order to work efficiently. For steering small turbines, a simple wind

    vane is used, while large turbines generally use a wind sensor coupled with a

    servo motor.

  • 8/9/2019 Wind Turbine Design and Feasibility Report 2

    4/13

    (4)

    Advantages This type of turbines has following advantages due to

    which it suites our requirements: -

    (a) The blade pitch angle can be varied to give the turbine blades anoptimum angle of attack. This feature enables the turbine to

    collects the maximum amount of wind energy for any time of the

    day and during any season.

    (b) The tall tower base allows access to stronger wind in sites with windshear. In some wind shear sites, every ten meters up, the wind

    speed can increase by 20% and the power output by 34%.

    (c) Since the blades always move perpendicular to the wind, theyreceive power through the whole rotation and hence are more

    efficient. In contrast, all vertical axis wind turbines involve varioustypes of reciprocating actions, requiring airfoil surfaces to backtrack

    against the wind for part of the cycle. Backtracking against the wind

    leads to inherently lower efficiency.

    (d) The face of a horizontal axis blade is struck by the wind at aconsistent angle regardless of the position in its rotation. These

    results in a consistent lateral wind loading over the course of a

    rotation, reducing vibration and audible noise coupled to the tower

    or mount.

    Figure No 3 Typical Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines

  • 8/9/2019 Wind Turbine Design and Feasibility Report 2

    5/13

    (5)

    VAWTs

    It is difficult to mount vertical-axis turbines on towers. These are often

    installed nearer to the base on which they rest, such as the ground or a

    building rooftop. This attribute of VAWTs make them more suitable for

    installation in populated areas, inside the cities (mounted on building

    rooftops) or at places where there is a restriction on maximum height of the

    building structures. Moreover, due to less height of the blades, they do not

    get sufficient wind speed and hence are not as effective (in general) as

    HAWTs.

    Figure No 4 Typical Vertical Axis Wind Turbines

    Keeping in view the above discussion, Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine

    (HAWT) was selected as most suitable option for type of wind turbine to be

    installed on farm lands.

  • 8/9/2019 Wind Turbine Design and Feasibility Report 2

    6/13

    (6)

    Figure No 5 Different Arrangements in Lift Type Wind Turbines

    IDEAS GENERATION

    Optimum Locations for Installation

    The installed location of wind turbine is one of the most important factors

    dictating the design of the system. As mentioned in the basic design

    requirements, the current system is being designed for large agricultural

    farms. So, followings design features may readily be concluded as these are

    the most feasible options for intended installation locations: -

    (a) Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine may be installed without any majorlimitations of tower height or area requirements.

    (b) Power requirements generally remain uniform throughout the year(c) Wind changes its speed and direction smoothly. So the turbine may

    not experience frequent variation of wind speed or directions. The

    chances of wind gusting are also less frequent.

  • 8/9/2019 Wind Turbine Design and Feasibility Report 2

    7/13

    (7)

    (d) As most of the farms are generally far off from cities where majormaintenance facilities are established; the design should call for

    minimum maintenance requirement and a reliable operation.

    Wind Power Density

    Wind Power Density or WPD is defined as the effective force of the

    wind at a particular location. It is a yardstick which frequently used to

    determine good locations for installation of wind turbines. Mathematically,

    wind power may be expressed as:

    1

    2

    1

    2

    1

    2

    1

    2

    1

    2

    Figure No 6. A Typical Wind Speed Distribution Chart

  • 8/9/2019 Wind Turbine Design and Feasibility Report 2

    8/13

    (8)

    The above relation shows that the wind power increases with the cube

    of the wind velocity. So, wind speed is the most influential variable defining

    the wind power density. Figure 6 shows a typical wind speed distribution

    chart for a typical location. This chart provides the most important data for

    installation of wind turbine.

    However, it is not possible to capture 100% of the wind power.

    Generally, the most efficient systems have efficiency not more than 55 to

    60%.

    Rated Power of the System

    The system to be designed is required to have a rated output from 800

    KW to 1000 KW. This is the power output which can fulfill the requirements

    of most of the agricultural farms worldwide thus enhancing the chances of

    acceptability for the users all over the world. The wind turbines of this

    capacity fall under the category ofMedium Sized Turbine Systems.

    Finalization of Basic Design Features

    Base on the discussion made above, the basic design features for the

    Wind Turbine are estimated. The design process will be started based on this

    design feature and further refinement will be carried out subsequently.

    Wind Turbine Type Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine

    Rated Power Range 800-1000 KWRotor Diameter 40 60 m

    Hub Height 60 80 m

    Sweep Area 1800 m2

    Number of Blades 3

    Brake System Yes

    Yaw Control Yes (Preferably an active control system)

    NEGOTIATION OF A DESIGN BRIEF

    Blade design

    Blades can be made from simple objects as barrels. New generation

    wind turbine designs are pushing power generation from the single

    megawatt range to upwards of 10 megawatts. The common trend of these

  • 8/9/2019 Wind Turbine Design and Feasibility Report 2

    9/13

    (9)

    larger capacity designs are larger and larger turbine blades. Thus they cover

    a larger area and effectively increase the tip speed ratio of turbine at a given

    wind speed. In this way, the energy extraction capability may be enhanced

    many times. A blade size of 25 meter was selected to fulfill the design

    requirements.

    Tip Speed Ratio

    The ratio between the speed of the wind and the speed the blade tips

    is called Tip speed ratio. High efficiency 3-blade-turbines have tip

    speed/wind speed ratios of 6 to 7.

    Figure No 7 Blades of Wind Turbine

  • 8/9/2019 Wind Turbine Design and Feasibility Report 2

    10/13

    (10)

    Blade materials

    Following options were considered to finalize the material for blade

    manufacturing.

    Option-1 Aluminum, Wood or Canvas Smaller blades can bemade from light metals such as aluminum. Wood and canvas sails were

    originally used on early windmills due to their low price, availability, and

    ease of manufacture. These materials, however, require frequent

    maintenance during their lifetime. Also, wood and canvas have a relatively

    high drag (low aerodynamic efficiency) as compared to the force they

    capture. For these reasons these materials are not opted for current design.

    Option-2 Composite Material Option Use of fiber reinforcedcomposites is increasing in wind turbine industry. In 2001, an estimated 50

    million kilograms of fiberglass laminate were used in wind turbine blades.

    New materials and manufacturing methods provide the opportunity to

    improve wind turbine efficiency by allowing for larger, stronger blades.

    In case of composites there are three main types which may used in

    blade manufacturing. These are:

    (a) Preimpregnated Composites(b) Epoxy based Composites(c) Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composites

    Figure No 8 A Typical Wind Turbine Blade

  • 8/9/2019 Wind Turbine Design and Feasibility Report 2

    11/13

    (11)

    Preimpregnated Composites Preimpregnated composites are an

    option for blade design. However, they come with following limitation:

    (a) Production of thick laminates necessary for structural componentsbecomes difficult.

    (b) Bleeding is required to eliminate voids and insure proper resindistribution.

    (c) Manual fabrication process lacks standardization.Epoxy based Composites Epoxy-based composites are of greatest

    interest to wind turbine manufacturers because they deliver a key

    combination of environmental, production, and cost advantages over other

    resin systems. Epoxies also improve wind turbine blade composite

    manufacturing due to the followings:

    (a) Shorter cure cycles(b) Enhanced durability(c) Improved surface finish.

    Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composites Carbon fiber-reinforced load-

    bearing spars have recently been identified as a cost-effective means for

    reducing weight and increasing stiffness. However, they have the inherent

    limitations of fabrications difficulty and relatively high cost of material.

    Keeping in view the above discussion, Epoxy Based Glass Reinforced

    composite material was used as the material for blade. Moreover, an

    integrated wire meshing was provided inside the composite layer which

    provides lightening protection besides giving an extra strength to the blade.

    COSTING OF PRODUCTS

    Cost of the system was estimated to be $ 0.25 million for each unit.

    The cost contains material and labor cost of all the individual components

    and systems. The detailed cost calculations are done by the other students

    report.

  • 8/9/2019 Wind Turbine Design and Feasibility Report 2

    12/13

    (12)

    BALANCING DESIGN/PERFORMANCE NEEDS

    Following is the summary of other design features incorporated in the

    system based on the operational requirements. A detailed discussion is

    made in the other students report.

    Operating Temp Range -2 to 40 degree C

    Turbine Diameter 50 m

    Tower Height 80 m

    Twisted rotor Blade Yes

    Blade Count 3

    Power Control Active

    Speed Control System Yes

    Brake System Hydraulic Brake with redundancy

    Sweep Area 1800 m2

    Rated Power Output 1 MWYaw Control Passive

    DESIGN FOR SAFETY

    The design of wind turbine is incorporated with various safeties. The brake

    system is made redundant to prevent the turbine from moving freely in case

    of brake failure. Moreover, the factor of safety in blade strength is kept on

    higher side to avoid blade failure. A wire mesh in blade material provides

    extra strength to the blade as well as provides lightening protection. Aircraft

    anti-collision arrangements have been made. In addition to this active speed

    control systems and pitch control systems are incorporated to avoid blade

    stall or over speeding which may cause rupturing of blades.

  • 8/9/2019 Wind Turbine Design and Feasibility Report 2

    13/13

    (13)

    LITERATURE SEARCH

    1. A Wind Energy Pioneer: Charles F. Brush, Danish Wind IndustryAssociation

    2. http://www.windpower.org/en/pictures/brush.htm3. "Part 1 Early History Through 1875".4. http://www.telosnet.com/wind/early.html.5. A.G. Drachmann, "Heron's Windmill", Centaurus, 7 (1961), pp. 145-

    151

    6. Dietrich Lohrmann, "Von der stlichen zur westlichen Windmhle",Archiv fr Kulturgeschichte, Vol. 77, Issue 1 (1995), pp.1-30 (10f.)

    7. Ahmad Y Hassan, Donald Routledge Hill (1986). Islamic Technology:An illustrated history, p. 54. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-

    42239-6.

    8. Donald Routledge Hill, "Mechanical Engineering in the Medieval NearEast", Scientific American, May 1991, p. 64-69. (cf. Donald Routledge

    Hill, Mechanical Engineering)

    9. "James Blyth". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. OxfordUniversity Press.

    10. http://www.oxforddnb.com/public/dnb/100957.html.11. a b Quirky old-style contraptions make water from wind on the

    mesas of West Texas.

    12. Alan Wyatt: Electric Power: Challenges and Choices. Book PressLtd., Toronto 1986, ISBN 0-920650-00-7

    13. Kansas Wind Energy Project, Affiliated Atlantic & Western GroupInc, 5250 W 94th Terrace, Prairie Village, Kansas 66207

    14. "Wind Energy Basics". American Wind Energy Association.15. http://www.awea.org/faq/wwt_basics.html.