Will catching-up continue smoothly in the “new” EU Members? Juergen Kroeger Director DG Economic...
-
Upload
conrad-wilcox -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
4
Transcript of Will catching-up continue smoothly in the “new” EU Members? Juergen Kroeger Director DG Economic...
Will catching-up continue smoothly in the “new” EU Members?
Juergen KroegerDirector
DG Economic and Financial AffairsEuropean Commission
13th Dubrovnik Economic Conference
June 27th to July 1st, 2007,
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this presentation are the author’s own and should not be regarded as stating an official position of the European
Commission.
2
Outline
1. “New” MS: successful catching-up but imbalances
2. “Floaters”: mostly fiscal imbalances situation and policy;
3. “Fixers”: private sector / financial imbalances situation and policies;
4. Conclusions
3
STYLIZED FACTS OF SUCCESSFUL REAL CATCHING-UP
Phase 1 : Upswing Initially real expected rate of upturn has to be high
In order to avoid overheating monetary policy has to be used, not fiscal policy
Tight money in the upswing is necessary to Contain inflation
Establish demand supply equilibrium
Help establishing inter temporal equilibrium
Appreciation reduces import costs
Current account deficit, covered by FDI, is a counterpart to fill the supply-demand gap.
4
STYLIZED FACTS OF SUCCESSFUL REAL CATCHING-UP
Phase 2 : Consolidation Higher investment increases the capital stock : Potential
output rises
Domestic supply approaches domestic demand
The marginal real rate of return shrinks to the level of partner countries
Monetary policy is gradually easing
Net exports rising as exchange rate depreciates
Current account moving towards a sustainable level
5
1.“New” MS: successful catching-up but imbalances
Growth and per-capita income figures indicate that catching-up has been successful…
PER-CAPITA INCOME 1997-2006(% of EU-15, PPS)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
BG RO PL LV LT SK HU EE CZ SI HR
1997 2006
EU-15 average
6
1.“New” MS: successful catching-up but imbalances
…but other indicators, esp. current account deficits, suggest potential problems ahead, in particular in “fixers”:
“Fixers”
Current account balance
-24-22-20-18-16-14-12-10
-8-6-4-202
BG EE LV LT CZ HU PL RO SI SK NMS HR euro area
% of GDP
2004 2005 2006 2007 (f) 2008 (f)
7
1.“New” MS: successful catching-up but imbalances
In some cases, FDI-financing of C/A-deficits is small and/or decreasing:
“F I X E R S”
Net FDI (% of current account deficit)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
BG EE LV LT CZ HU PL RO SI SK HR
%
2003 2004 2005 2006
8
1.“New” MS: successful catching-up but imbalances
C/A deficits are private sector-driven in “fixers”, while being more public sector-driven in “floaters”:
“F I X E R S” “F L O A T E R S”
Current account and domestic counterparts (2006) (% of GDP)
0.1
-8.8-7.7
-10.3
-2.2
-5.9-4.1
-10.7
-21.1
-15.8-13.9
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
BG EE LV LT CZ HU PL RO SK HR Euroarea
Public sector (S-I)
Private sector (S-I)CA - deficit
9
2. “Floaters”: mostly fiscal imbalances
• Room for fiscal consolidation and expenditure rationalization:
Composition of general government expenditure in 2006
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
BG EE LV LT CZ HU PL RO SI SK HR euroarea
% GDPOther
GFCF
Interest
Subsidies
Soc. benefits otherthan in kind
Soc. transfers inkind
Collective cons.
10
3. “Fixers”: mostly private sector / financial imbalances
– Against a backdrop of negative real interest rates…
“F I X E R S”
Short term real interest rates
Euro area
Euro area
BG
BGCZ
CZ
EE
EE
LV
LV
LT
LT
HU
HU
PL
PL
RO ROSI
SI
SK
SK
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
2003 2004 2005 2006
Euro area BG CZ EELV LT HU PLRO SI SK
11
3. “Fixers”: mostly private sector / financial imbalances
– …high growth in “fixers” predominantly driven by high domestic consumption, while external contribution negative:
“F I x e r s” “F l o a t e r s”
Contributions to GDP growth (2006)(percentage points)
6.1
11.4 11.9
7.56.1
4.05.8
7.7 8.3
4.82.7
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
BG EE LV LT CZ HU PL RO SK CR Euroarea
Net exportsConsumptionInventoriesInvestmentGDP growth
12
3. “Fixers”: mostly private sector / financial imbalances
– Although investment remains strong, it consists to a substantial extent of construction:
“Fixers”
Share of construction in total investment, year 2005
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
BG EE LV* LT CZ HU PL RO SI SK HR euroarea
% GDP
Total investmentConstruction (excl. Housing)Housing
* Data for Latvia (LV) are for 2004.
13
3. “Fixers”: mostly private sector / financial imbalances
– And the share of the construction sector in GDP is quite large and growing:
“Fixers”
Construction sector
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
BG EE LV LT CZ HU PL RO SI SK HR euroarea
% GDP
2004 2005 2006
14
3. “Fixers”: mostly private sector / financial imbalances
– Unit labour cost developments do not bode well for external competitiveness:
Nominal unit labour cost - Manufacturing
LV
HUBG
EE
LT
CZ
PL
RO
SISK
euro area
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
2003 2004 2005 2006
% y-o-y
“Fixers”
15
3. “Fixers”: mostly private sector / financial imbalances
– Credit growth is reaching staggering levels…
“Fixers”
Domestic Credit
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
BG EE LV LT CZ HU PL RO SI SK HR NMS euroarea
% y-o-y2003/2002 2004/2003 2005/2004
16
3. “Fixers”: mostly private sector / financial imbalances
– …with credits to households growing particularly fast…(Y-o-y, end-2006)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
RO LV LT EE PL SK CZ BG HU
household sector
non-financialcorporations
Fixers
Fixer
17
3. “Fixers”: mostly private sector / financial imbalances
– …and foreign currency lending often dominating:
Foreign currency lending as a % of total outstanding credit, 2005
0,0%
10,0%
20,0%
30,0%
40,0%
50,0%
60,0%
70,0%
80,0%
EE LV LT BG RO HU SK PL CZ
households
corporates
Fixers Floaters
18
3. “Fixers”: mostly private sector / financial imbalances
– While real estate prices are high…
Source: Bank of Latvia
Appartements: ratio of price per m2 in the capital to gross average wage
LV ES FR EE PL CZ IT SI LT IE DK FI NL LU DE AT BE
3.5
3
2.42.2 2.2
2.1
1.61.5 1.5 1.5
1.3 1.2 1.2
0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6
19
4. Conclusions
• Catching-up has been successful but there are signs of overheating in the “fixers” (and RO), which could hamper the efficient resource allocation and endanger smooth further real convergence;
• The remaining policy instruments of the “fixers” to cope with the situation are limited to fiscal policy and structural policies (in particular related to the financial sector);
• This could be a lesson for the “floaters” (see e.g. RO) not to peg their exchange rate too early or manage it too tightly and to contain balance sheet exposures to exchange rate movements;