What’s new in Breast Disease M. Whitney Parnell MD FACS Surgical Associates of Myrtle Beach Breast...
-
Upload
henry-atkins -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of What’s new in Breast Disease M. Whitney Parnell MD FACS Surgical Associates of Myrtle Beach Breast...
What’s new in Breast Disease
M. Whitney Parnell MD FACSSurgical Associates of Myrtle Beach
Breast and General Surgery
Dense Breasts ABUS 3-D Mammography BRCA1 BRCA2 and beyond Prophylactic Surgery Cancer Sub-typing (oncotype
DX/Mammoprint)
Hot topics
What does it mean to say dense breasts?Who has dense breasts?Are women with dense breasts at increased risk of developing cancer?What should we do differently?Legislation
Dense Breasts
Breast Anatomy
Fat and glandular tissue More glandular
tissue=denser breast Denser the breasts the
whiter the mammogram Mammogram may miss
up to 40% of cancers in dense breasts
Dense Breasts
Age Hormone levels Genetics Age at first
pregnancy #of pregnancies HRT
Mammograpy’s dirty little secret
Up to 40% of cancer can be missed on standard mammography in dense breasts !
Type 1—mostly fatty replaced Type 2 Average breast tissue 25-50%
Type 3 Heterogenously dense 50-75% Type 4 Extremely dense >75% dense tissue
Dense breast Classifications
Dense Breast Classifications
Why Mammography?
Inexpensive Safe (low radiation) Accessible Sensitive and Specific Effective in reducing
mortality from Breast Cancer
Since 1990’s there has been a decrease in mortality from breast cancer 2.2%/year due to screening mammography
Most frequent dx non-skin cancer in Women 226,870 new cases/yr in US 63,000 new cases of DCIS 40,000 women die annually of breast cancer Second leading cause of cancer death in
women
Breast Cancer Stats
Breast Cancer Risk Factors
Early menarche Late Menopause Nulliparous HRT Post-menopausal obesity ETOH Breast Density
Dense breast are an independent risk cancer for cancer development
Mult retrospective studies show the odds ratios for developing breast cancer in the least dense compared with the densest breast ranges from 1.9-6.0 (ave 4.0) Harvey et al. Radiology 2004
Dense breasts=more Cancer?
Breast cancer is a progressive disease and early detection offers women an opportunity to halt the natural evolution of the cancer, increases her treatment options, and ultimately saves lives.
Early Detection
Mammogram is still the gold standard for screening and it is an invaluable tool— Assessing interval change Architectural distortions Calcifications (i.e. DCIS—stage 0)
Why get a mammogram if I have dense breasts?
Breast Ultrasound MRI Digital breast tomosynthesis
Other Imaging Modalities
Safe—no radiation Technologic advancements have improved
resolution Breast density is a non-issue Easy to perform Well tolerated by patient Invaluable asset to mammography
Ultrasound
High risk women with dense breasts Improved cancer detection 13-28%
Most cancers were early stage invasive node negative cancer
Kolbe et al Radiology 2002 ACRIN 6666; JAMA 2008
Improved Cancer Detection
Connecticut was first 2009—Public Act 09-41
"If your mammogram demonstrates that you have dense breast tissue, which could hide small abnormalities, you might benefit from supplementary screening tests, which can include a breast ultrasound screening or a breast MRI examination, or both, depending on your individual risk factors. A report of your mammography results, which contains information about your breast density, has been sent to your physician's office and you should contact your physician if you have any questions or concerns about this report.
Legislation
South Carolina
Introduce bill Feb 2013 Currently in the House Committee on Labor
Commerce and Industry Sponsored by Senator Joel Lourie
Staffing/Time intensive with low reimbursement
Technician dependent ACR/ACS lack guidelines Adding u/s to mammography increases the
false positive rate 4X—ACRIN 6666: Jama 2008
Breast Ultrasound
Automated Breast Ultrasound Screening 3mins per breast (19mins with u/s tech) Full exam time 15 mins Gives complete 3-D volumetric imaging of
the breast Approved in Sept 2012 “explicitly for breast
cancer screening for asymptomatic women with dense breast tissue.”
97% sensitive when used with mammograpy
ABUS
ACS guidelines Recommended for high risk individuals annually with mammography Known BRCA 1 or 2 mutations First degree family member with genetic
mutation >20% lifetime risk based on Risk analysis models Chest wall radiation ages 10-30 Li-Fraumeni, Cowden and Bannayan-Riely
Ruvalcaba syndromes and first degree relatives
Breast MRI
Expensive Requires contrast agent (baseline creatinine) Uncomfortable (prone position) Lacks insurance mandate Lacks specificity Time in the magnet
Breast MRI
Originally approved as add-on only FDA 2013-approved for use without standard
2-D mammography Provides images of the breast in “slices”
from many different angles Not always covered by insurance Machines cost 2x as much
3-D Mammography
Higher cancer detection rate 4.1 vs 2.9/1000 Less call backs 91 vs 107/1000 Higher bx rate 19.3 vs 18.1 Higher radiation dose (both within safe
limits) Overseas use since 2008—restrict it to
patients with breast problems JAMA. 2014;311(24):2499-2507
3-D Mammography
BRCA1 and BRCA 2 are human genes that produce tumor suppressor proteins
Help repair damaged DNA With mutations of these genes—damaged
DNA is not repaired properly Responsible for 25% of genetic breast cancer
5-10% of all breast cancer 15% of ovarian cancer
Genetics
Genetics
BRCA1
55-65% will develop breast cancer in their lifetime
40% lifetime risk of ovarian cancer
Fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer
Prostate cancer Pancreatic cancer
BRCA2
45% will develop breast cancer in their lifetime
12% lifetime risk of ovarian caner
Linked with male breast cancer
Prostate cancer Pancreatic cancer
Who should get tested?
Breast cancer before 50 Cancer in both breasts Breast and ovarian cancer Personal or family hx of
Male breast cancer
Triple negative breast cancer before age 60
Ashkenazi Jewish heritage and family hx of breast or ovarian cancer
Ovarian cancer before 50
3 rules
Multiple –combination of cancers in the same side of the family
Young--<50 Rare—male breast; triple neg; colorectal or
endometrial cancer with abnormal MSI/IHC;
Identifies elevated risk of 8 cancers by analyzing multiple clincally actionable genes
Retrospective analysis of patients (2006-2013)
6.9% of patients appropriate for HBOC testing also meet Lynch criteria
30% of patients appropriate for Lynch testing also meet HBOC
Expanded panel testing
Previvor - "Cancer previvors" are individuals who are survivors of a predisposition to cancer but who haven’t had the disease. This group includes people who carry a hereditary mutation, a family history of cancer, or some other predisposing factor.
Unaffected carrier
Previvor
Increased awareness Increased inquiries into testing Better lay understanding of genetic testing Prophylactic Mastectomy
Angelina Jolie Effect
Risk reduction of 90+ % Still need to consider prophylactic
oophorectomy Nipple sparing techniques (1% less risk
reduction)
Prophylactic Mastectomy
Molecular profiling
Oncotype Dx Mammoprint
Genomic test of the activity of a group of genes
How cancer may respond to treatment Early stage ER+ breast cancer recurrence
and ?benefit from chemo DCIS—recurrence and or risk of new invasive
cancer developing and ?benefit from XRT
OncotypeDX
Summary
Dense breasts Birads 3 and 4 benefit from annnual screening ultrasound
Consider genetic testing for multiple/ young/rare
Nipple sparing prophylatic mastectomy option
Cancer molecular profiling or subtyping expanding—targeted therapy
Questions?
Questions