webquest

10
What happened the day when you were born? http://w ww.guardian.co .uk/football/2009/ nov/15/uruguay-beat-co sta-rica

description

This webquest will help your students to relate their lives with important past events in their countries; as well as it will provide them past simple practice in a meaningful context.

Transcript of webquest

Page 1: webquest

What happened the day when you were

born?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/nov/15/uruguay-

beat-costa-rica

Page 2: webquest

1) What important political events happened the year you were born?

2) Who was the Uruguayan president?

3) Were there any sport championships?

4) Which football team won the Uruguayan championship?

5) Did any international celebrity visit the country?

6) Was any famous person born the same day that you? And the same year?

7) Which films were popular the year you were born?

8) Which song was the most popular?

Guiding questions:

Page 3: webquest

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1229362.stm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_association_football

http://www.worldcup-history.com/index.php?siden=VM&aaret=2010

Resources

Page 4: webquest

Process:

• Get in groups of four according to the year you were born.

• Use the resources to find information about the year and the day you were born.

• Select the events you consider the most important. To do this, you have to use the guiding questions and to listen to each other.

• Remember to include at least one event which happened on the same day each member of the group was born.

• You can add any other relevant event.

Page 5: webquest

Task

• Make a presentation about the main events, including pictures and comments; using: glogster.com

Page 6: webquest

Content

Unsatif Barely satisf.

Acceptable

Good Very good

Content Content is of the subject

Content is not clear at all.

Clear content/not ambitious.

Clear

content/adecuate use of theretical knowledge

Relevant content/ covered appropriately.

Language Inability to convey the target meaning

Very poor control/dificult to understand

Most of the time able to convey meaning, however lang is unambitious

Good at conveying menaing. fairly ambit. use of lang.

Confident and ambit. use of language.

Grammar Errors which impede comprehension.

Numerous errors which sometimes impede compreh.

Number of errors may be present, but are mostly non-impiding.

Some errors generally non. Impiding

Minor errors or not errors at all.

Page 7: webquest

Procedural Unsatif Barely satisf.

Acceptable

Good Very good

Focus on the task

T observes student is distracted and not focused on the task at all.

T observes student barely tries to focus on the task but gets distracted

Student proves to be focused on the task and to rarely get distracted

Student demonstrates to be focused on the task and does not get distracted

Student proves and T observes he/she is completely focused on the task proposed and tries helping others to do the same.

Presentation/organization

No abstract prior to the presentation/ absence of organization

Poor abtract,not accurate enough/ incoherence in organ.

Clear presentation which evidence prior abstract.Some attent at organ.

Very clear presentation which lead to an addecuate work/ evidence of organ. and some linking of sentences.

Very clear presentation Well/evidence prior abstract.Some organised and coherent throut the use of Linking devices.

Critical thinking

No evidence Reflexion below

standard

Minimal reflection shown but acceptable theoretical and practical connection still

evident.

Good level of reflection shown. Appropriate theoretical and practical connection is evident

Very good level of reflection shown. Outstanding

theoretical and practical connection is evident.

Page 8: webquest

Attitudinal Unsatif Barely satisf.

Acceptable

Good Very good

Participation No participation at all

Poor interaction and participation

Participate regularly and respect partners.

Evidence of managemnet skill in interaction and participation.

Very good management of interaction and

participation Shared respons.

No evidence of shared responsibility

Few evidence of shared responsibility

Acceptable evidence of shared responsibility

Good evidence of shared responsibility, student participates in tasks.

Very good evidence of shared responsibility: student participates in the group opinion and tasks are correctly divided and carried out.

Behaviour. Student does not behave, is disruptive and distracts classmates.

Student does not behave and is disruptive

Student makes an effort to behave when being asked, and is not generally disruptive.

Student behaves properly and is not disruptive

 Student behaves properly, is not disruptive at all and promotes classmates good behaviour.

Page 10: webquest

Autor: Natalia Guevara