WC-Chapter 1-Path Loss and Shadowing.pdf
-
Upload
quoc-nguyen -
Category
Documents
-
view
227 -
download
0
Transcript of WC-Chapter 1-Path Loss and Shadowing.pdf
-
8/12/2019 WC-Chapter 1-Path Loss and Shadowing.pdf
1/11
1
Chapter 1
a oss an a ow ngHa Hoang Kha, Ph.D
Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology
Email: [email protected]
Outline
Signal Propagation Overview
a oss o e s Free-space Path Loss Ray Tracing Models Simplified Path Loss Model Empirical Models
2 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
1. Propagation Characteristics
Path Loss (includes average shadowing)
Shadowing (due to obstructions)
Multipath Fading
Pr/PtPr
Ptv Very slow
Slow
Fast
d=vt
d=vt
3 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
Pathloss is caused by dissipation of the power radiated by
the transmitter as well as effects of the propagation.
Shadowding: is caused by obstacles between the transmitterand receiver that absorb power.
ccur ng over very arge stances - meters
Occuring over distances proportional to the length of theobstructin ob ect 10-100 meters
Pathloss and Shadowing are referred to as large-scalepropagation or local mean attenuation.
Path Loss and Shadowing 4 H. H. Kha, Ph.D
-
8/12/2019 WC-Chapter 1-Path Loss and Shadowing.pdf
2/11
2
Path Loss Modeling
Maxwells equations Complex and impractical
Free s ace ath loss model Too simple
Ray tracing models Requires site-specific information
Empirical Models Dont always generalize to other environments
Simplified power falloff models
Main characteristics: good for high-level analysis
5 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
2. Transmit and receive signal model
Signals in wireless communications is the UHF and SHF(Ultra and super high frequency) bands, from 0.3-3 GHzand 3-30 GHz.
where is a complex baseband signal with in-
We model the transmitted signal as
fc is the carrier frequency (B
-
8/12/2019 WC-Chapter 1-Path Loss and Shadowing.pdf
3/11
3
Free-space path loss
Assume there is no obstructions between the transmitterand receiver, i.e., a line-of-sight (LOS) channel.
Received si nal:
=c/fc: wavelength d: distance of the wave travels : the product of the transmit and receive antenna field
Path Loss and Shadowing 9 H. H. Kha, Ph.D
.
Ratio of received to transmitted power is computed by
Free Space Propagation Model
The path loss for the free space model when antennagain are included is given by
When antenna gains are excluded, the antennas are
assumed to have unity gain and path loss is given by
( )( )
210log 10log
4
t t r
L
r
P dBP d
= =
2P
( )2og og 4
L
rP d= =
Path Loss and Shadowing 10 H. H. Kha, Ph.D
Free Space Propagation Model
The free space propagation model is used to predict
received signal strength when the transmitter and
receiver have a clear unobstructed line-of-si ht ath
,between them.
The free space model predicts that received powerdecays as function of the transmitter-receiver (T-R)separation distance raised to some power.
,
decreases. However, the antenna gain of highlydirectional antennas can increase with frequency.
Path Loss and Shadowing 11 H. H. Kha, Ph.D
Example
Consider an indoor wireless LAN with fc=900 MHz,
cell radius 10m, and nondirectional antennas. Under the
free-s ace ath loss model what transmit ower is
,required at the access point such that all terminals
within the cell receive a minimum power of 10uW.How does this change if the frequency is 5 GHz.
Path Loss and Shadowing 12 H. H. Kha, Ph.D
-
8/12/2019 WC-Chapter 1-Path Loss and Shadowing.pdf
4/114
4. Ray Tracing Model
Models all signal components Reflections
Scattering
Diffraction
Requires detailed geometry and dielectric properties ofsite
m ar o axwe , u eas er ma .Computer packages often used
13 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
Two-Ray Model
Used when a single ground reflection dominated themultipath effect.
,
rural roads or highways.Not a good model for indoor environments
Path Loss and Shadowing 14 H. H. Kha, Ph.D
Two-Ray Model
Received signal:
-
:the time delay of the ground reflection relative to the
LOS ray. : the product of transmit and receive antenna field
radiation in the LOS direction.
: the product of transmit and receive antenna fieldradiation patterns corresponding to the refection rays.
R: the ground refection coefficient
If the transmitted signal is narrowband relative to the
delay spread then
Path Loss and Shadowing 15 H. H. Kha, Ph.D
Ray Tracing Approximation
Represent wavefronts as simple particles
Geometry determines received signal from eachsignal component
Typically includes reflected rays, can also includescattered and defracted rays.
Requires site parameters
Geometry
Dielectric properties
16 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
-
8/12/2019 WC-Chapter 1-Path Loss and Shadowing.pdf
5/115
Two-Ray Model
The received power of the two-ray model fornarrowband transmission
-
: the phase difference between the two signalcomponents.
When d>> ht+hr, we have
and 0, and R=-1.
Path Loss and Shadowing 17 H. H. Kha, Ph.D
Two-Ray Model
For asymptotically large d,and R=-1, the received power is approximately
or, in dB
The critical distance dc is the distance after that the
signal power falls off proportionally to d-4.
Cell radius are typically smaller than dc.
Path Loss and Shadowing 18 H. H. Kha, Ph.D
Received Power versus Distance
Path Loss and Shadowing 19 H. H. Kha, Ph.D
Two Path Model
Path loss for one LOS path and 1 ground (or
reflected) bounceGround bounce approximately cancels LOS path
above critical distance
Power falls off
Proportional to d2 (small d)
Proportional to d4 (d>dc)
Independent of (f)
20 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
-
8/12/2019 WC-Chapter 1-Path Loss and Shadowing.pdf
6/116
Example
Determine the critical distance for the two-way modelin an urban microcell (ht=10m, hr=3m) and indoor
microcell h =3m and h =2m at f =2GHz. r c .
Solution:
Urban microcell: dc=800 m
Urban microcells are on the order of 100 m to maintainlarge capacity.
n oor system: c= mTypically indoor system has a smaller cell radius, on the
order of 10-20 m.
Path Loss and Shadowing 21 H. H. Kha, Ph.D
Dielectric Canyon (Ten-Ray Model)
A model for urban area transmission
Other empirical studies have obtained power falloff
with distance proportional to d-where lies anywherebetween to and six.
Path Loss and Shadowing 22 H. H. Kha, Ph.D
In the simplified model, path loss as a function ofdistance is commonly used for system design.
Most important parameter is thepath loss exponent ,
5. Simplified Path Loss Model
eterm ne emp r ca y.
or, in dB d0 is a reference distance for the antenna far-field. (d0=1-10m
- .
K is the free space path loss at distance d0:
The path loss exponent can be obtained via a minimummean square error (MMSE) fit to empirical measurements.
23 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
Typical Path Loss Exponents
Macrocell radius: 1Km-30 Km
Microcell radius: 200-2000 m
Picocell radius: 4m-200 m
24 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
-
8/12/2019 WC-Chapter 1-Path Loss and Shadowing.pdf
7/117
Example
Given a transmitter produces 50 W of power. If this power isapplied to a unity gain antenna with 900 MHz carrier frequency,find the received power at a free space distance of 100 m fromthe antenna. What is Pr(10 km). Assume unity gain for thereceiver antenna
Ans: Pr(100m)=-24.5 dBm; Pr(10Km)=-64.5 dBm
Path Loss and Shadowing 25 H. H. Kha, Ph.D
Consider the set of empirical measurements of Pr/Pt given in thetable below for an indoor systems at 2 GHz. Find the path lossex onent that minimizes the MSE between the sim lified model
Example
and the empirical dB power measurements, assuming that d0=1mand K is determined from the free space path loss formula at thisd0.
26 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
6. Empirical Models
Okumura model Empirically based (site/freq specific)
Awkward (uses graphs)
Hata model
Analytical approximation to Okumura model
Cost 136 Model: Extends Hata model to higher frequency (2 GHz)
Walfish/Bertoni:
Cost 136 extension to include diffraction from rooftops
Commonly used in cellular system simulations
27 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
Indoor Propagation Models
Indoor environments differ widely in The materials used for walls and floors
The layout of rooms, hallways, windows, and open areas,
The location and material in obstructing objects
The size of each room and the number of the floors.
At higher frequency the attenuation loss per floor istypically larger.
Table is the
28 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
partition lossesmeasured at 900-1300 MHz
-
8/12/2019 WC-Chapter 1-Path Loss and Shadowing.pdf
8/118
Indoor Propagation Models
The simple path loss for indoor environment:
is obtained from the path loss for a same floormeasurement.
FAFi represents the floor attenuation factor (FAF) for the ithfloor traversed by the signal.
PAFi represents the partition attenuation factor (PAF).
Nfand Np are the number of floors and partitions traversedby the signal:
29 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
Example
Suppose, in an office building, a 2.4 GHz transmitterlocated at a workstation is separated from the networkaccess node (receiver) by a distance of 35 m. Thetransmission must pass through 5 m of an office,through a plasterboard wall, and then through a largeopen area. The propagation is modeled as free space forthe first 5 m and with a loss exponentof 3.1 for theremainder of the distance. The plasterboard wall causes6 dB attenuation of the signal. The isotropic transmitter
radiated 20 dBm. Can the link be closed if the receiverhas a sensitivity of -75 dBm?
30 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
Main Points
Path loss models simplify Maxwells equations
Power falloff with distance is proportional to d2 in freespace, d4 in two path model
General ray tracing computationally complex
Main characteristics of path loss captured in simple
model Pr=PtK[d0/d]
31 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
In addition to path loss, a signal will typical experience
random variation due to blockage from the signal path
Changes in the reflection surfaces and scattering objects
7. Shadowing
is the path loss caused by shadowing which is a randomvariable. Empirically, is a log-normal distribution given by
32 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
-
8/12/2019 WC-Chapter 1-Path Loss and Shadowing.pdf
9/119
In previous example, we found the exponent for the
simplified path loss model that best fit themeasurements was =3.17. Assuming the simplified
Example
path loss model with this exponent and the same K=-
31.54 dB, find , the variance of log-normal
shadowing about the mean path loss based on theseempirical measurements.
Ans:
33 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
Models for path loss and shadowing are typically
superimposed to capture power falloff versus distancealong with the random attenuation about this path loss
8. Combined Path Loss and Shadowing
from shadowing.
Slow10log is a Gauss-distributedrandom variable with mean zero
34 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
r t
(dB)
log d
Very sl ow-10
In wireless systems, there is typically a target minimumreceived power level Pmin below which performancebecome unacceptable.
9. Outage Probability under Path Loss and
Shadowing
Outage probability is the probability that thereceived power at a given distance d, , falls below Pmin , i.e.
where
35 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
Normal or Gaussian Distribution
36 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
-
8/12/2019 WC-Chapter 1-Path Loss and Shadowing.pdf
10/1110
Q- function
37 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
Q- function
38 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
Example
39 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
Outage Probabilityand Cell Coverage Area
Path loss: circular cells
Path loss+shadowing: amoeba cellsr
P
Tradeoff between coverage and interference
Outage probability
Probability received power below given minimum
Cell coverage area
Increases as shadowing variance decreases
Large % indicates interference to other cells
40 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
-
8/12/2019 WC-Chapter 1-Path Loss and Shadowing.pdf
11/1111
References
[1]A. Goldsmith, Wireless Communications, Cambridge UniversityPress, 2005.
. , , ,http://www.stanford.edu/class/ee359/archived_material/2010/lectures.html
41 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing
Homeworks
Problems: 1, 2, 13, 18, 21 in Chapter 2 of [Goldsmith 2005]
42 H. H. Kha, Ph.DPath Loss and Shadowing