Wat doe ik zoal - Vrienden van De Witt · Strategisch Leiderschap. Bob de Wit Mission, vision and...
Transcript of Wat doe ik zoal - Vrienden van De Witt · Strategisch Leiderschap. Bob de Wit Mission, vision and...
Bob de Wit
Wat doe ik zoal
“The authors carefully guide the readers through the many, often conflicting, perspectives in the field of strategy, in order to help them become critical and creative strategic thinkers”.
Bob de Wit
Bob de Wit
Professor of Strategic Leadership, Nyenrode Business Universiteit and Maastricht School of ManagementDirector, DWM Strategy Group, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Member Review Board, Strategic Management Society
Member Advisory Board, Journal of Change Management
Author of 12 books and many articles and book chapters
Working experience in 35 countries at all continents
Specific interest in non-Western countries
Married, one daughter
Bob de Wit
Leiderschap in de Republiek
Bob de Wit
Vereniging Vrienden van De WittZaterdag 27 November 2010
Bob de Wit
Strategisch Leiderschap
Bob de Wit
Mission, vision and strategy
Bob de Wit
Strategy & Leadership
Bob de Wit
Strategie VormingOntwerpen (planning) of Ontvouwen (emergence)
Emergence
Acting first, then thinking to let strategy emerge
Planning
Thinking before acting to intentionally design strategy
Bob de Wit
Ontwerpen en Ontvouwen‘Great leadership’ van Johan and Cornelis
Netherlands
Germany
Great leaders:
‘Great’ leaders have the ability and capabilities to bridge differences of opinion, preference and interests at a higher level’ (Collins & Porras)
21ST Century leaders
‘This goes beyond professional competence. It relates to personal development objectives and ambitions’(Trompenaars & Hampden-Turner)
Strategic Leaders:
‘Strategic leaders have the ability and capabilities to apply ‘great’ leadership principles on strategic issues and tensions’ (De Wit & Meyer)
Emergence
Planning
Bob de Wit
Strategy formation stylesAdvantages and disadvantages
Deliberate choicesFact-based discussionsClarity for peopleConsistent process steps
FlexibilityLearning from actingResponsivenessKnowing is doing
RigidityNumbers as objectivesProcedures, no processBureaucratic ‘rain dance’
Muddling throughContinuous improvisingLack of clarity for peopleDrifting from intended vision
Advantages
Disadvantages
Planning process Incremental process
Bob de Wit
Centraal and Decentraal Leidershap
DecentralAutonomy
Remain attuned to specific regional demands,
responding to unique local characteristics
Central Control
Centralize resources, integrate activities and align
procedures across all regions
Bob de Wit
Centralisatie en Decentralisatievan de Republiek
Netherlands
FranceFrankrijk:
Primair centraal, relatief veel machtvoor centraal gezag in ‘Parijs’
Nederland
Primair decentraal, relatief veel machtvoor provincies
Decentralize
Centralize
Bob de Wit
Leaders and Strategy TensionsTen key strategy paradoxes
V
Source: De Wit & Meyer, 2010
Bob de Wit
Strategic Goals
Core Interests
Core Values
Personal Malleability
Personal Competence
Interpersonal Influence
Interpersonal Control
Org. Decision-making
Organizational Composition
Strategy Continuity
Ambition Realism
Self-actualization Service
Wealth Health
Authenticity Adaptation
Thought Action
Challenge Appreciation
Tasks Conditions
Direction Participation
Unity Diversity
Exploitation Exploration
Purpose
Section Chapter Topic Leadership Tension
Personal
Interpersonal
Organizational
Strategic
Strategists and Leadership Tensions
Bob de Wit
The End
Bob de Wit
Models for International Organizations
Barlett and Ghoshal, 1995
Bob de Wit
Characteristics of Organizational Models
Organized along geographic linesSubsidiaries are self-sufficient (autonomous)Level of standardization is lowMultinational
Decentralized Federation
Organized along geographic linesClose HQ-subsidiary relationshipCore competences are developed centrallyInternational
Coordinated Federation
National units relatively unimportantLevel of standardization/ centralization is highCoordination is directed by HQGlobal
Centralized Hub
Close HQ-subsidiary relationshipsClose subsidiary-subsidiary relationshipsLow level of centralizationTransnational
Integrated Network