Warehouse Receipt Systems for food security and resilience building by Mtendere Mchakama
-
Upload
ifprimassp -
Category
Government & Nonprofit
-
view
128 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Warehouse Receipt Systems for food security and resilience building by Mtendere Mchakama
Mtendere Mchakama
Warehouse Receipt Systems for food security and resilience building
Food, Income and Markets Programme
• Five-year programme in three districts (Lilongwe, Nkhotakota, and Nsanje)
• Targets 21,000 poor and extremely poor smallholder farmers
• Overall goal is to enable poor and vulnerable households to achieve adequate and sustainable access to resource and livelihoods necessary to achieve their rights
Most pressing needs for smallholder farmers
1. Farm inputs e.g. Seed, Fertilizer
2. Capacity Building Technical knowledge in good agriculture practices Agribusiness Management Skills Access to good markets
3. Access to Financial Services Savings Credit
Does WRS play a role in meeting those needs?
1. Markets Link farmers with reliable buyers Provides platform where farmers get better commodity
prices Provides market information
2. Finance Provide receipt for accessing credit with banks More sales income leads to more savings by farmers
3. Farm Inputs More sales means farmers more able to acquire farm inputs
Concern’s experience – linking farmers to AHCX
Group name: Umodzi Revolving Fund Members: 250 poor and very poor
smallholder farmers 162 (99 female) of 250 members
participated in selling through AHCX
Ltd – WRS Group formed through Mwansambo
Youth Organization, Nkhotakota
District Crop sold: Groundnuts Year of participation: 2013
Process – linking farmers
Planning meetings with AHXC
Introduction of AHXC marketing team to farmers
Informing farmers and giving time to make decision
Farmers’ group experiences
18,220 kg harvested
and stored in local
warehouse
15,220 kg transported to Lilongwe
Group notified of
grading/sale price after two weeks
Receipt used to leverage loan from local bank
Loan used to purchase inputs for growing season
Member checked
prices, and sale done
when target was close
Results
ACHX Service Charges Unit Unit Cost (MK) # Units Total Cost (MK) Per Person costs (n=162)
Storage Per day 450 111 49,950 Storage Per day 7 122 805 AHCX Commission 2.00% 99,018 1 99,018 Member Fee 1.00% 49,509 1 49,509 Handling Fee Lump sum 4,000 1 4,000 Grading by ARET Per MT 500 15 7,610 Total Deducted by AHCX 210,892 1,302Other Costs Packaging 50kg sacks 133 300 39,990 Truck hire 15 MT truck 130,000 1 130,000 Interest on loan Lump sum 122,000 1 62,000 Total Other Costs 231,990 1,432Total Associated Costs 442,882 2,734 Gross Income (sale of gnuts) 4,950,900 30,561Net Income (less costs) 4,508,018 27,827 Est. income if sold at harvest locally 3,348,400 20,669Value Added (Amount) 1,159,618 7,158Value Added (%) 35% 35%
Net income: MK 4,508,018
Estimated income if sold at harvest locally: MK 3,348,400
VALUE ADDED: MK 1,159,618 (35%)
What Worked
1. Unit Selling Prices increased at AHCX from time of crop deposit to sale 11th July, MK325/kg 31st Oct, MK345/kg 11th Nov 2013)
2. Accessed MK650,000 credit with Malawi Savings Bank (MSB) using Warehouse Receipt
3. Accessed market information through mobile phone4. Avoided post – harvest losses5. Got certified grading of G/Nuts by ARET
Understanding the needs and concerns of local farmers
Despite a positive return on investment, with 35%
value added, farmers chose not to repeat their
engagement with AHXC again this year
Why?
Results from follow-up discussions
1. Four months waiting for sale seemed long time for the very
poor Produce was assembled by end June at Mwansambo The very poor wanted to cash in sooner than the poor Farmers counted on having influx of cash in order to be able
to carry out other small enterprises during the pre-planting
season; the delay represented a missed opportunity to them
2. Inconsistencies in quality of G/Nuts of members leading to
lower grade Group thought they would get higher grade
Recommendations
1. Continue with the system because of the benefits gained
2. AHCX can use district farm forums for more SHFs outreach in rural
areas; important to be very clear about costs and timelines
3. Target existing SHFs cooperatives and associations
4. Build capacity in good agriculture practices and agribusiness
management skills for Cooperatives and Associations
5. Several interested SHF groups can join together to meet minimum
requirements
6. Careful recording of each individual’s consignment to avoid mixed
grading
7. Access to credit to continue to cater for immediate financial needs of
very poor
A presentation to Karina Howley, KPMG — 4th April 2011
Thank You