Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

36
Deciphering Structural Information from the Multiexcitonic Spectra of a Quantum Dot Vladan Mlinar & Alex Zunger National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, Colorado USA [email protected]

description

For more information about the Spectral Barcoding and establishing structure-spectra relationship in quantum dots, see the following publications: - Vladan Mlinar and Alex Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 80, 035328 (2009). - Vladan Mlinar et al. Phys. Rev. B 80, 165425 (2009). -------------------------- My full publications list can be found at: www.vladanmlinar.com/publications.html

Transcript of Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Page 1: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Deciphering Structural Information from the Multiexcitonic Spectra of a Quantum Dot

Vladan Mlinar & Alex Zunger

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Golden, Colorado USA

[email protected]

Page 2: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

QDs: Structure - Spectra relationship

Methods for structural characterization

• TEM based methods

• X-ray diffraction

• X-STM

Single-dot spectroscopy

Page 3: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

QDs: Structure - Spectra relationship

(M. Bozkurt, J. M. Ulloa, & P. M. Koenraad)

Methods for structural characterization

• TEM based methods

• X-ray diffraction

• X-STM

Single-dot spectroscopy

• No atomic resolution

• All of the methods require assumption

about composition profile and/or shape!

Page 4: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

QDs: Structure - Spectra relationship

(M. Bozkurt, J. M. Ulloa, & P. M. Koenraad)

Methods for structural characterization

• TEM based methods

• X-ray diffraction

• X-STM

Single-dot spectroscopy

• No atomic resolution

• All of the methods require assumption

about composition profile and/or shape!

(M. Ediger &

R. J. Warburton)

Page 5: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

QDs: Structure - Spectra relationship

(M. Bozkurt, J. M. Ulloa, & P. M. Koenraad)

Methods for structural characterization

• TEM based methods

• X-ray diffraction

• X-STM

Single-dot spectroscopy

• No atomic resolution

• All of the methods require assumption

about composition profile and/or shape!

• Controllable number of electrons and holes

• μeV resolution

(M. Ediger &

R. J. Warburton)

Page 6: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Typically, Structure is used to predict Spectra

• Since for quantum dots we do not know the structure:

Assume

or

measure

structure

Measured

emission

spectra

Calculate

resulting

spectra

Structure

Page 7: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Typically, Structure is used to predict Spectra

• Since for quantum dots we do not know the structure:

Is this possible?

Assume

or

measure

structure

Measured

emission

spectra

Calculate

resulting

spectra

Structure

Page 8: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Question: What is the structural information encoded in the multiexcitonic spectra of a QD?

?

Page 9: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Spectral Barcoding vs. DNA Barcoding:

Barc

oder

Barc

odin

g

Organism is identified as belonging to a particular species

Sci. Am. p. 82-88 (October 2008)

Page 10: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Spectral Barcoding vs. DNA Barcoding:

Barc

oder

Barc

odin

g

Organism is identified as belonging to a particular species

Sci. Am. p. 82-88 (October 2008)

Page 11: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Spectral Barcoding vs. DNA Barcoding:

Barc

oder

Barc

odin

g

Organism is identified as belonging to a particular species

QD is identified as belonging to a group of QDs with common structural motifs.

?

Vladan Mlinar and Alex Zunger, PRB 80, 035328 (2009).

Page 12: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

How does the Spectral Barcoding work?

Spectral barode:

Vladan Mlinar and Alex Zunger, PRB 80, 035328 (2009).

Page 13: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

How does the Spectral Barcoding work?

Artificial Intelligence QD library

Deterministic links between

structures and spectral marker(Distilling rules from library)

Spectral barode:

Spectral barcoding

procedure

Vladan Mlinar and Alex Zunger, PRB 80, 035328 (2009).

Page 14: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

How does the Spectral Barcoding work?

Artificial Intelligence QD library

Deterministic links between

structures and spectral marker(Distilling rules from library)

Structure

Structural Motifs:

• h = 2 – 3nm

• Xav(In) = 75-80%

RESULT: a set

of QD structural

motifs!

Spectral barode:

Spectral barcoding

procedure

Vladan Mlinar and Alex Zunger, PRB 80, 035328 (2009).

Page 15: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Spectral Barcoding: Data-mining of the library

Structure

QD structure is discretized into a set of Ns=5 structural motifs, each taking up one of

Nv possible values:

Motifs: Shape b (nm) h (nm) XIn (%) profile

Trun.Cone 12 2.0 50 Homog.

Trun. Pyr. 18 3.0 60 Linear

Lens 20 3.5 70

Elong.

Lens [110]

23 4.0 80

Elong.

Lens [110]

25 5.0 90

Elong.

Lens [100]

30 6.0 100

Page 16: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Spectral Barcoding: Data-mining of the library

Structure

QD structure is discretized into a set of Ns=5 structural motifs, each taking up one of

Nv possible values:

Motifs: Shape b (nm) h (nm) XIn (%) profile

Trun.Cone 12 2.0 50 Homog.

Trun. Pyr. 18 3.0 60 Linear

Lens 20 3.5 70

Elong.

Lens [110]

23 4.0 80

Elong.

Lens [110]

25 5.0 90

Elong.

Lens [100]

30 6.0 100

Bayesian Data Reduction Algorithm:

• Training: Testing how each structural motif and its corresponding values influences the

barcode

• Result: Identifies the set of structural motifs that are responsible for a given spectral

barcode sequence.

Page 17: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Spectral Barcoding: Consistency test!

Vladan Mlinar and Alex Zunger,

PRB 80, 035328 (2009).

Page 18: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Spectral Barcoding: Consistency test!

Vladan Mlinar and Alex Zunger,

PRB 80, 035328 (2009).

Page 19: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Spectral Barcoding: Consistency test!

Vladan Mlinar and Alex Zunger,

PRB 80, 035328 (2009).

Page 20: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Spectral Barcoding: Consistency test!

Validation!

Vladan Mlinar and Alex Zunger,

PRB 80, 035328 (2009).

Page 21: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Question: How does the deduced structure relates to the “real structure”?

Page 22: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Spectral Barcoding: Why is it important?

Quantum Dot

growth

Structural Characterization by X-STM

Single-dot Spectroscopy

Antonio Badolato

(ETH Zurich, Switzerland)

Theory

Collaboration with

three experimental

groups!

Many body

pseudopotential

calculations

Calculated spectra

Page 23: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Spectral Barcoding: Why is it important?

Quantum Dot

growth

Structural Characterization by X-STM

Single-dot Spectroscopy

Antonio Badolato

(ETH Zurich, Switzerland)

M. Bozkurt, J. M. Ulloa, & P. M. Koenraad

(TU Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

Theory

Collaboration with

three experimental

groups!

Many body

pseudopotential

calculations

Calculated spectra

Page 24: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Spectral Barcoding: Why is it important?

Quantum Dot

growth

Structural Characterization by X-STM

Single-dot Spectroscopy

Antonio Badolato

(ETH Zurich, Switzerland)

M. Bozkurt, J. M. Ulloa, & P. M. Koenraad

(TU Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

Theory

M. Ediger & R. J. Warburton

(Heriot-Watt University, UK)

Collaboration with

three experimental

groups!

Many body

pseudopotential

calculations

Calculated spectra

Page 25: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Spectral Barcoding: Why is it important?

XS-2 < XT

-2 < X-1 < XX0 < X0 sequence

in measured spectra from each and

every QD studied in the ensemble is

kept.

Quantum Dot

growth

Structural Characterization by X-STM

Single-dot Spectroscopy

Antonio Badolato

(ETH Zurich, Switzerland)

M. Bozkurt, J. M. Ulloa, & P. M. Koenraad

(TU Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

Theory

M. Ediger & R. J. Warburton

(Heriot-Watt University, UK)

Collaboration with

three experimental

groups!

Many body

pseudopotential

calculations

Calculated spectra

Page 26: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Spectral Barcoding: Why is it important?

XS-2 < XT

-2 < X-1 < XX0 < X0 sequence

in measured spectra from each and

every QD studied in the ensemble is

kept.

Quantum Dot

growth

Structural Characterization by X-STM

Single-dot Spectroscopy

Antonio Badolato

(ETH Zurich, Switzerland)

M. Bozkurt, J. M. Ulloa, & P. M. Koenraad

(TU Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

Theory

M. Ediger & R. J. Warburton

(Heriot-Watt University, UK)

Collaboration with

three experimental

groups!

Many body

pseudopotential

calculations

Calculated spectra

• Exciton energies

• XS-2 < XT

-2 < X-1 < XX0 < X0

sequence

?V. Mlinar, G. Bester, &

A. Zunger (NREL)

Vladan Mlinar et al., PRB 80, 165425 (2009).

Page 27: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

XSTM→Theory→Spectroscopy Fails to Close Loop!

Structure

• Exciton Energies:

Calculated: 1.05 -1.12 eV

Measured: 1.08-1.09 eV

Vladan Mlinar et al., PRB 80, 165425 (2009).

Page 28: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

XSTM→Theory→Spectroscopy Fails to Close Loop!

Structure

• Spectral Hard Rules:

All five XSTM deduced Model QDs

violate Spectroscopic Hard rules!

EXP. XS-2 < XT

-2 < X-1 < XX0 < X0

Model 1 XS-2 < X0 < XX0 < X-1 < XT

-2

Model 2 XS-2 < X0 < XX0 < XT

-2 < X-1

Model 3 X0 < XX0 < XS-2 < X-1 < XT

-2

Model 4 X0 < XS-2 < XX0 < X-1 < XT

-2

Model 5 XS-2 < XX0 < X0 < X-1 < XT

-2

Vladan Mlinar et al., PRB 80, 165425 (2009).

Page 29: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Structural motifs underlying Spectral Hard Rule:

Spectral barcoding

Procedure

INPUT:

Vladan Mlinar et al., PRB 80, 165425 (2009).

Page 30: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Structural motifs underlying Spectral Hard Rule:

Spectral barcoding

Procedure

INPUT:

OUTPUT:

Primary structural

Motifs

1. Height (h)

2. Base-length (b)

3. Average In

composition (XIn) Vladan Mlinar et al., PRB 80, 165425 (2009).

Page 31: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Spectroscopy→Theory→Structure closes the Loop!

Page 32: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Spectroscopy→Theory→Structure closes the Loop!

• More than one dot can be constructed!

• Spectral Hard Rules are satisfied by

the construction!Vladan Mlinar et al., PRB 80, 165425 (2009).

Page 33: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Conclusions:

Spectral Barcoding: Procedure for deciphering structural motifs from the multiexcitonic spectra

• We established missing structural basis for QD spectroscopy

• We offer spectroscopically-derived structural motifs that combined with

X-STM measurements give more realistic QD structure.

Thank you for your attention!

Vladan Mlinar et al., PRB 80, 165425 (2009).

Vladan Mlinar and Alex Zunger, PRB 80, 035328 (2009).

Page 34: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Basic Paradigm of Spectroscopy of Molecules

Structure

• To understand the spectra one must know the structure

(hence symmetry) of the molecule

• Structure-spectra relationship in molecules has historically been

facilitated by the accumulated knowledge on electronic and vibrational

spectral fingerprints of specific groups making up the molecules

• Deliberate design of molecules with given properties

Page 35: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

Spectroscopic vs. Geometrical QD size:

Can we construct a model QD that has geometrical size as extracted from XSTM, but

spectroscopic size as deduced by spectral barcoding?

Page 36: Vladan Mlinar 2009 Materials Research Society Spring Meeting

XSTM deduced Model QDs:

Model 1 Model 2

Model 5

Model 3 Model 4

• Truncated cone

• No wetting layer

• Truncated pyramid

• No wetting layer

• Truncated pyramid

• No wetting layer

• Ellipsoid

• No wetting layer

• Truncated cone

• Includes wetting layer