Validation Cell Analyzers
-
Upload
candiddreams -
Category
Documents
-
view
27 -
download
7
description
Transcript of Validation Cell Analyzers
Validation procedures for cell analyzers
Dr Archana VazifdarDept. of Hemato-Pathology,
SRL Religare Ltd.
Validation
A documented act of demonstrating that a procedure, process, & activity will consistently lead to expected results
FDA 1987
Principles of automation
• Impedance – count and size cells by change in resistance produced as they are suspended in an electrically conductive medium
• Optical scatter- measures scatter properties of cells by laser light
• RBC & Platelets measured in one channel
– RBC volume > 30-36 fl
– Platelet volume 2-20 fl
• Hb & WBC measured in second channel
• DLC in third channel
Validation of automated CBC analyzers:
– interpretation of numeric, graphic & flag data
– Delta checks
– Review of peripheral smear
Interpretation of data
Normocytic Normochromic
RBC count
Spurious increase:•Giant platelets•High WBC counts (>50)
Spurious decrease:•Cold /warm agglutinins•Very small RBC•Cryoglobulins
ADVIA 120
CELL-DYN
COULTER
Platelet count
Spurious increase:•RBC/ WBC fragments•Cryoglobulins•Lipids
Spurious decrease:•Platelet clumps•Giant platelets
neutrolympho
Baso,mono, eos, blasts
WBC (FCM)
Normal WBC scatterplot
Normal WBC histogram
Impedance- VCS
Optical scatter: ADVIA120DLC by Peroxidase method
Spurious increase
•PLT clumps & large platelets •Nucleated red cells•Resistant RBC’s
Spurious decrease:
•Clotted sample•Fragile cells- CLL•Lymphoid aggregates- UTI, B- cell NHL, CMML•Storage associated degeneration
Flags
• A signal to the operator that the analyzed sample may have a significant abnormality/ does not meet acceptance criteria/ cannot be displayed
• Cause of errors:– Analyzer– Sample– Random run error
RBC flagsSuspect flags• N’rbc, R’rbc, Micro RBC, RBC fragments,
– interfere with WBC & platelet counts• H & h errors• short sample, aged sample
Definitive flags• Anemia, anisocytosis, microcytosis,
macrocytosis, poikilocytosis• Erythrocytosis
FLAG:Anemia, Microcytosis, anisocytosis
Hb 8.5RBC 3.2
Left shift of curve:
MicrocytosisIron Deficiency Anemia
β thalassemia trait Anemia of chronic diseases
Conclusion:
s/o Iron Deficiency AnemiaAdvise Iron studies
ACTION:
RBC indicesMentzer’s index (MCV/RBC)=
18.3MI ≤ 13- BTT, ≥ 13- IDA
Flags:•N’rbc, Micro RBC/ RBC fragments•Giant platelets•ThrombocytopeniaLt of curve not touching baseline:NoiseSchistocytes &/ extremely small rbcGiant platelets
PLT 140MPV 7.9PCT .148PDW 15
Hb 6.4
Conclusion:
RBC count falsely ↓Platelets falsely ↑ (mask t’penia)
Hemolytic anemia
Action:
•RBC Indices- MCV, RDW•PLT Histogram- MPV & PDW •Review PS- RBC morphology
-PLT count (100)
Bimodal peak: Dimorphic RBC population
Transfused cellsCombined deficiencyTherapeutic response in IDA
Hb- 8.6, MCH- 26.5, MCHC- 32.2
Flags:Dimorphic RBC population, anisocytosis
Action:
Review PS to identify cause
50/ F, Hb-8.9, MCV-73, MCH- 25.6, RDW-26.8
Blood transfusion
Dual/Combined deficiency
45/F, Severe pallorHb-5.1, MCV-96.7, MCH- 29.6, MCHC-31.4, RDW-24.5 TLC/Plt-Normal
S. Fe- 25TIBC- 144
S. Fe saturtn- 20.8S. B12- 158
Right portion of curve extended:RBC agglutinationN’rbcsLeukocytosis
Flags:H&H error, N’rbc, dimorphic redsAnemia, macrocytosis, anisocytosis
H&H
• Sample related problems- turbidity-↑ Hb– Lipemia/ TPN– Cryoglobulins
• Autoagglutination• Hemolysis (in-vitro/vivo)• Spurious ↓ Hct• Clotted sample
Spurious ↑MCHC:
corrected
Conclusion:False ↓ RBC, Hct, False ↑ MCV, MCH & MCHC
Cold agglutinin disease
After warming in H2O bath @ 37ºC for 15 mins
Action:Review PS: L/F agglutination vs n’rbc’s
Short sample (microtainer)Repeat collection
Causes of H&H mismatch:
•partial sample aspiration/ improper mixing•Hb/ MCV measurement error/ very low•High WBC counts (interfere with Hb measurment)
•Cold agglutinins
PlateletsSmallest guys largest culprits!!
• As platelet counts fall, reliability of analyzer decreases.
• Conventional methods are unable to provide consistently accurate results in lower range
• Clinicians using thresholds of 5-10 X 109/l must be aware of the limitations in precision and accuracy of cell counters
Linearity : 10–1,000 X 109/l
Common platelets flags
• PLT Clumps – ↓Plt counts– Interferences with WBC Results (↑WBC
counts)• Giant platelets• Small platelets• PIC/POC delta- difference > 20,000• Thrombocytopenia- true/false
Increased small sized particles:
Noise, debris, lipids, bacteria, fungi ? Wiskott Aldrich syndrome
Conclusion:
Falsely elevated platelet counts
Flags:Small platelets
Debris/ noise
Action:
Review PS for platelet count
Conclusion:
Falsely ↑RBC countFalsely ↑WBC count
Falsely ↓ Plt count, ↑MPV
Giant platelets
Flags:Giant platelets, platelet clumpsCellular interference
Non fitted curve with increase in large cells:
Large platelets, clumps
PIC/POC delta
•Excessive noise included in impedance count•Debris, bacteria, fungi•Plt clumps•Giant plt
45/M
IG, Band, BlastsAty ly, Variant lyMPO, non viable WBCN’RBC, rst RBCPlt clumpOutside Reportable RangeLeukocytosis, monocytosis, basophilia, eosinophiliaUnable to Find Clear Separation between WBC subpopulations
WBC Flags
Shoulder on the left of curve:
N’rbcLyse resistant RBCPlatelet clumps/ Giant plateletsFibrinImpedance noise
Flags: IG, Blasts, eosinophilia,monocytosis, lymphopenia
CML
LeukocytosisThrombocytosisAnemia
Flags:Aty lymphocyte, Variant lymphocyteNon-viable wbcLeukocytosisT’penia
Acute Leukemia
38/F, k/c/o DM
Flag: leukocytosis, n’rbc, dimorphic reds
Conclusion:
21 nrbc’s/100 wbc- corr WBC= 17.35
DM in sepsis with liver abscess
Plt 100
VCS:•Quantitative •Operator independent•Routinely available•Inexpensive
INCREASE MEAN NEUTROPHIL VOLUME (MNV)DECREASE MEAN NEUTROPHIL SCATTER (MNS) –left shift
–Lacking leukocytosis or neutrophilia
Newer Aspects: VCS-Neutrophil population data
Suggestive of acute bacterial sepsis
Automated malaria detection
• “Gold standard” - thick & thin smear • Need for rapid, sensitive & cost-effective
screening technique
• Hemazoin pigment• Activation of neutrophils & monocytes• Increase volume heterogeneity (anisocytosis) of
monocytes & lymphocytes, detected by VCS
• ‘Positional parameters’, used as objective criteria for detecting presence of plasmodium
Clin. Lab. Haem., 26, 367–372 Automated detection of malaria
Normal P lasmodium falciparum
Monocytes
Reactive LY
Parasitized RBC
Vol SD lymphocyte X SD Monocyte / 100 > 3.7
Am J Clin Pathol 2006;126:691-698Briggs et al / MALARIA DETECTION USING VCS TECHNOLOGY
shoulder
• Specificity is 94% and sensitivity 98%
• PPV is 70% and NPV 99.7%.
• A flag indicating potential presence of malaria is a valuable diagnostic method for detection of malaria and may become a routine parameter in it’s diagnosis
Case 1 38/M, No history available
Result after treatment in H20 bath @ 37 ̊C
Cold agglutinin disease
27/M, Hb 7, MCV 94, MCH 32, MCHC 35.7, RDW 14.6, Plt 158
Flags: Blasts, IG, n’rbc, rbc fragments, giant platelets
Case 2
Conclusion:
Severe hemolysis following Primaquine ingestion in G6PD deficiency
50 nrbc’s/100 WBCSpherocytes +Giant platelets
Case 3 : 33/M, Thrombocytopenia X 6 mnths, no bleeding. All other parameters WNL, ? ITP
Flags: n’rbc, micro rbc/ rbc fragments
Action:
Change anticoagulant to Sodium Citrate
Platelet count- 243
Conclusion
EDTA dependant pseudothrombocytopenia(EDP)
Case 4: 15/M, Fever
Conclusion:
Plasmodium falciparum , PI 15%Thrombocytopenia
Malaria discriminant factor= 6.3
THANK YOU
Archana Vazifdar, M.D.SRL Religare Ltd.