V. Sreeja and M. Aquino Nottingham Geospatial Institute, University of Nottingham
description
Transcript of V. Sreeja and M. Aquino Nottingham Geospatial Institute, University of Nottingham
Evaluation of the Ionospheric Scintillation Effects on GNSS Receiver
Tracking Performance over Latin America with Tracking Jitter Maps
V. Sreeja and M. AquinoNottingham Geospatial Institute, University of Nottingham
2
Outline of Presentation
IntroductionData and MethodologyResultsConclusions
3
Ionospheric ScintillationRapid fluctuations in the amplitude and phase of transionospheric signals caused by small scale plasma density irregularities
Basu, S. et al., J. Atmos. Terr. Phys, 2002
4
Ionospheric Scintillation Effects on GNSS receivers
Significantly degrade GNSS receiver tracking performanceCode and phase tracking loop performances can be degraded
Variance of the error at DLL / PLL output (tracking jitter) increases during scintillation
Good measure of scintillation effect on the receiver
Delay Locked Loop (DLL) Phase Locked Loop (PLL)
Rapid intensity fluctuations Rapid phase fluctuations
Accurate code phase alignment Accurate phase estimation
Difficulty in acquisition Cycle slips, loss of lock, difficulty in tracking
5
Data and Methodology [1] Open sky scintillation data recorded in November 2012 by PolaRxS receivers during the Fp7 CIGALA project (2010-2012)
1) Presidente Prudente (PPTE) - located close to the Equatorial Ionisation Anomaly (EIA) crest (dip lat 12.3S)
2) São José dos Campos (SJCI) - located under the EIA crest (dip lat 17.8S)
3) Porto Alegre (POAL) - located beyond the EIA crest (dip lat 20.5S)
6
PolaRxS receiver signal tracking performance at GPS L1C/A evaluated by:
Tracking model of Conker et al. (2003) Variance of tracking error at the carrier tracking
loop (PLL) output
kpkp
nkf
T
LSACLnc
LSACLncnB
OSC2
]12[sin1))1(241(/1)0/(
]))1(2421(/1)0/(2
11[
22
Conker, R. S. et al., Radio Sci., doi: 10.1029/2000RS002604, 2003
Oscillator noise=0.01 rad2 Thermal NoisePhase scintillation
Data and Methodology [2]
7
RESULTS
8
Maps of amplitude scintillation index, S4
All satellites with elevation > 30⁰
dip lat 12.3S
dip lat 17.8S
dip lat 20.5S
9
Receiver PLL jitter variance Maps
dip lat 12.3S
dip lat 17.8S
dip lat 20.5S
V. Sreeja et al., Space Weather, doi: 10.1029/2011SW000707, 2011
10
Receiver PLL jitter variance Maps: High latitude
Data from CHAIN kindly provided by Dr Paul Prikryl
11
Application of Jitter variance Maps
Provide users with the information on the prevailing tracking conditions under scintillation (possibly in near-real time)Mitigate the effects of ionospheric scintillation on GNSS positioning through the strategy introduced by Aquino et al. [2009]
Stochastic model – assigns satellite and epoch specific weights based on the estimated tracking jitterImprovement between 17% and 38% in height accuracy was obtained by this method
Aquino et al. J. Geod., 83, doi:10.1007/s00190-009-0313-6, 2009
12
ConclusionsPLL jitter variance maps for GPS L1C/A signal during 13-16 November 2012 over Presidente Prudente, São José dos Campos and Porto Alegre in BrazilJitter variances calculated using the scintillation-sensitive tracking model of Conker et al. [2003]Jitter variances calculated on all the simultaneously observed satellite-to-receiver links during 13-16 November during the local pre-midnight hours are large over Presidente Prudente and São José dos Campos This indicates the likelihood for cycle slips and degradation of measurement quality, consequently degrading positioning accuracyJitter variance maps could be useful for improving the positioning accuracy by applying weights to individual satellite to receiver links using the method of Aquino et al. [2009]
13
THANKS