Using Data for ELL SuccessAllyson Hile, Director of Language ServicesStephanie Easley, ELL Assessment Specialist

DESE Data RequestStudent names and MOSIS AMAO achievement Cohort

MAP Achievement

MAP-ACCESS Correlation

Math ELATotal # of students Cohort 1 Cohort 2

Overall ACCESS score

Advanced Advanced 24 3 21 5.52Proficient Advanced 35 5 30 5.31Advanced Proficient 40 5 35 5.40Advanced Basic 16 2 14 4.58Proficient Proficient 96 14 82 5.01Basic Proficient 104 20 84 5.07Proficient Basic 67 6 61 5Basic Basic 183 23 160 4.64Below Basic Basic 187 14 163 4.45Basic Below Basic 197 43 152 4.09Below Basic Below Basic 479 87 291 3.73

2015 MAP & ACCESS Correlation

Math ELATotal # of students Cohort 1 Cohort 2

Overall ACCESS score

Advanced Advanced 23 6 17 5.5Proficient Advanced 16 4 12 5.46Advanced Proficient 22 3 19 5.67Advanced Basic 23 3 20 5.2Proficient Proficient 92 7 85 5.6Basic Proficient 51 5 46 5.48Proficient Basic 201 29 171 4.95Basic Basic 585 69 516 3.62Below Basic Basic 79 8 71 3.96Basic Below Basic 193 47 146 3.64Below Basic Below Basic 202 54 148 3.09

2014 MAP & ACCESS Correlation

What do you notice about MAP achievement versus language proficiency?

Math ELATotal # of students Cohort 1 Cohort 2

Overall ACCESS score

Advanced Advanced 23 6 17 5.5Proficient Advanced 16 4 12 5.46Advanced Proficient 22 3 19 5.67Advanced Basic 23 3 20 5.2Proficient Proficient 92 7 85 5.6Basic Proficient 51 5 46 5.48Proficient Basic 201 29 171 4.95Basic Basic 585 69 516 3.62Below Basic Basic 79 8 71 3.96Basic Below Basic 193 47 146 3.64Below Basic Below Basic 202 54 148 3.09

2014 MAP & ACCESS Correlation

District Wide Trend

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

Axis

Title

AMAO 2- MET

2015

2014

2013

2012

More Trends

1st-2nd Writing 2nd-3rd Writing

Principal Data “Chats”

Using ACCESS growth reports, identify:

• Promising trends

• Concerning trends

• Next steps, highlighting� Professional development possibilities such as coaching specific

teachers/teams, whole staff professional development, department PD such as SIOP, CLIMBS, co-teaching

� How can Language Services support you?

8th-9th Writing

9th-10th 9th-10th9th-10th Writing Growth

Central Office Data “Chats”

Helps to explain the language load of the MAP/EOC

Justify:

• budget requests (additional ESL staff)

• the need for MAP and other accommodations

Math ELATotal # of students Cohort 1 Cohort 2

Overall ACCESS score

Advanced Advanced 23 6 17 5.5Proficient Advanced 16 4 12 5.46Advanced Proficient 22 3 19 5.67Advanced Basic 23 3 20 5.2Proficient Proficient 92 7 85 5.6Basic Proficient 51 5 46 5.48Proficient Basic 201 29 171 4.95Basic Basic 585 69 516 3.62Below Basic Basic 79 8 71 3.96Basic Below Basic 193 47 146 3.64Below Basic Below Basic 202 54 148 3.09

2014 MAP & ACCESS Correlation

ELLevation Education Software

• Scale Score Comparison Reports

• Score History Report

• Students Needing Attention

• Future use:� Individual Education Plans� Electronic monitoring-MELLs and FLEPs� Progression monitoring-ELLs

Scale Score Comparison

ELP Score History Report

Students Needing Attention

Questions?

Thank you!