Laurel News Laurel Technical Institute’s Sterling Building ...
Using Classroom Competitions to Prepare Students for the Competitive Business World Laurel Powell...
-
Upload
hope-adams -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of Using Classroom Competitions to Prepare Students for the Competitive Business World Laurel Powell...
Using Classroom Competitions to Prepare Students for the Competitive Business World
Laurel Powell
October 2014
Authors
• Fay Y. Gibson
• Doris H. Kincade
• Pamela Y. Frasier
• North Carolina State University
• Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
• University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Goals
• Using classroom competition and to promote active learning.
• Business Partners
• Fashion Majors
Active Learning
• Active learning is very popular in business fields
• Active Learning in the Fashion Field• Interaction with Consultants and Clients
• Teamwork
Competition in the Classroom
• Reality Television
• Engaging and Motivating
• Business Schools
• Cooperation
• Concerns over negative and hostile environment
The Course
• Original course• Lectures
• Short Reports
• Projects
• Redesign• Competing Teams
• Research and Projects
• Industry Based Projects
Team Selection
• Teams of 3 to 5
• Self-selected
• Composition impacts teamwork
• Student formed is preferable to instructor formed
• Peer Evaluations
Peer Evaluation
• Ten Criteria• Attending meetings, communication, punctuality, quality work,
ideas contributed
• 4 point scale
Component 1
• Investigating a Product Specific Market
• Analyzing a Specific Market Segment
• Conducting Brand Analysis Research
• Concluded with creating a new product line for an existing brand
Component 2
• Genius Bar• Alumni with national companies
• Local Businesses, Marketing Agencies, Trade Organizations, Government Agencies
• Resource Librian
Component 3
• Competition Process • Evaluation of Projects from Component 1
• Accumulation of Points
• Final Competition between the six highest scoring teams
Evaluation
• Instructor Evaluation• All projects
• Not shared
• Panel Evaluation• Drawn from “Genius Bar”
• Top Six
Results
• Student Evaluations• Frequent negative comments over team member lateness or poor
work
• Positive comments were praise for extra work or willingness to work
• Students were enthusiastic over the Genius Bar and data collection. Useful for resume expansion and future projects.
• Better understanding in later courses.
Results
• Higher grades throughout• Fewer A’s
• More B’s
• No C, D or F
• More in depth work and enthusiasm from students
Conclusion
• Facilities teamwork
• Cooperation
• Improved Understanding
Questions?Thank You!