Using CEM Data: Target Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

37
Using CEM Data: Target Setting, Monitoring & Reporting Belfast, March 6 th 2013 Neil Defty Business & Development Manager CEM [email protected]

description

Using CEM Data: Target Setting, Monitoring & Reporting. Belfast, March 6 th 2013 Neil Defty Business & Development Manager CEM [email protected]. Which Baseline to use?. Student 1 . Student 2. Student 3. Student 3 - IPR. Key Questions for Target Setting. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Using CEM Data: Target Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Page 1: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Using CEM Data:Target Setting, Monitoring &

Reporting

Belfast, March 6th 2013Neil Defty

Business & Development ManagerCEM

[email protected]

Page 2: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Which Baseline to use?

Page 3: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Student 1

Page 4: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Student 2

Page 5: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Student 3

Page 6: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Student 3 - IPR

Page 7: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Key Questions for Target Setting

• What type of valid and reliable predictive data should be used to set the targets?

• Should students be involved as part of the process (ownership, empowerment etc.)?

• Should parents be informed of the process and outcome?

Page 8: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Key points to consider might include:

• Where has the data come from?• What (reliable and relevant) data should we

use?• Enabling colleagues to trust the data: Training

(staff)• Communication with parents and students• Challenging, NOT demoralising, students….• Storage and retrieval of data• Consistency of understanding what the data

means and does not mean

Page 9: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Value Added: The theory and Stats bits…

Page 10: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

20

40

60

80

100

120

Subject X

Out

com

e

.

Trend Line/Regression Line

Measuring Value Added – Terminology

BASELINE SCORE

-ve VA+ve VA

Residuals

VA

Exa

m g

rade

Page 11: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Measuring Value Added – An Example

Low Ability Average Ability

High Ability

Baseline Score

A*

U

B

C

D

E

F

G

Res

ult Aldwulf Beowulf

Cuthbert+ve (+ 2 grades)

-ve (- 2 grades)

National Trend

‘Average’ Student

The position of the national trend line is of critical importance

Subject A

Subject B

Page 12: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

5 6 7 840

60

80

100

120

140

PhotographySociologyEnglish LitPsychologyMathsPhysicsLatin

Average GCSE

Gra

de

Some Subjects are More Equal than Others….A-Level

>1 grade

A*ABC

A

A*

B

C

D

E

Page 13: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Burning Question :

What is my Value Added Score ?

Better Question :

Is it Important ?

Page 14: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Value Added ChartsPre 16

Page 15: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Performance in line with expectation

VA Score

Performance below expectationProblem with Teaching & Learning?

Performance above expectationGood Practice to Share?

Page 16: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Which Subjects Cause Most Concern?

Danger of Relying on Raw Residuals Without Confidence Limits

Page 17: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Additional A

pplied Science

Additional S

cience

Art &

Design

Biology

Business S

tudies

Chem

istry

Design &

Technology

Dram

a

English

English Literature

French

Geography

Germ

an

History

Mathem

atics

Music

Physical E

ducation

Physics

Religious S

tudies

Science

Spanish

Short C

ourse Religious S

tudies

-4-3-2-101234

0.00.8 0.5

-0.3

1.1

-0.4

1.00.2 0.4 0.1 0.1

0.0

0.0 0.1

0.0

0.0

-0.3

0.2 0.5

-0.3

0.70.2

-2.9

0.0

Average Standardised Residuals by Subject

Aver

age

Stan

dard

ised

Res

idua

l

Which subjects now cause most concern ?

Page 18: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Business Studies

Page 19: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting
Page 20: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Religious Studies

Page 21: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Value Added ChartsPost 16

Page 22: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

SPC Chart

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Year

Performance in line with expectation

VA Score

Performance below expectationProblem with Teaching & Learning?

Performance above expectationGood Practice to Share?

Page 23: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Subject Summary - 3 Year Average

Subject Summary - Current Year

Page 24: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

-0.60-0.48-0.36-0.24-0.120.000.120.240.360.480.60

2002 2003 2004

Aver

age S

tanda

rdise

d Res

idual

Year

-0.60-0.48-0.36-0.24-0.120.000.120.240.360.480.60

A2-English Literature

Statistical Process Control (SPC) Chart

2008 2009 2010Year

Page 25: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Student Level Residuals (SLR) Report

Scatter Plot

A2 – English Literature

General Underachievement?

Page 26: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Student Level Residuals (SLR) Report

Scatter Plot

A2 – English Literature

Too many U’s?

Page 27: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Other things to look for…

Why did these students do so badly?

Why did this student do so well?

How did they do in their other subjects?

Page 28: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Summary of Process

• Examine Subject Summary• Determine ‘interesting’ (i.e. statistically significant) subjects• Look at 3 year average as well as single year if available• Look at trends in ‘Interesting Subjects’• Examine student data – Scatter graphs• Identify students over / under achieving• Any known issues?• Don’t forget to look at over achieving subjects as well as under

achieving

Page 29: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Baseline Choice

Page 30: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

• Do students with the same GCSE score from feeder schools with differing value-added have the same ability?

• How can you tell if a student has underachieved at GCSE and thus can you maximise their potential?

• Has a student got very good GCSE scores through the school effort rather than their ability alone?

• Does school GCSE Value-Added limit the ability to add value at KS5?

• Can you add value at every Key Stage?

GCSE or Baseline Test?

Page 31: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

The Effect of Prior Value Added

Beyond Expectation+ve Value-Added

In line with Expectation0 Value-Added

Below Expectation-ve Value-Added

Average GCSE = 6 Average GCSE = 6 Average GCSE = 6

Do these 3 students all have the same ability?

Page 32: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Same School - Spot the Difference ?

GCSE as Baseline

Test as Baseline

Page 33: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

National or School Type Specific?

Page 34: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Comparison to all schools

Comparison to Independent Schools Only

Page 35: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Comparison to all schools

Comparison to FE Colleges Only

Page 36: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Questions:

→ How does the unit of comparison used affect the Value Added data and what implications does this have on your understanding of performance?

→ Does this have implications for Self Evaluation?

Page 37: Using CEM  Data: Target  Setting, Monitoring & Reporting

Definitions:• Residual – difference between the points the student attains and

points attained on average by students from the CEM cohort with a similar ability

• Standardised Residual – the residual adjusted to remove differences between qualification points scales and for statistical purposes

• Average Standardised Residual – this is the ‘Value Added Score’ for any group of results

• Subject VA – average of standardised residuals for all students’ results in the particular subject

• School VA – average of standardised residuals for all students’ results in all subjects for a school / college

• Confidence Limit – area of statistical uncertainty within which any variation from 0 is deemed ‘acceptable’ and outside of which could be deemed ‘important’