LECG is a global litigation; economics; consulting and business advisory; and governance, assurance, and tax expert services firm. We provide independent expert testimony, original authoritative

studies, strategic financial advisory services, and innovative business consulting solutions.

Attest services provided through Smart and Associates, LLP, pursuant to an alternative practice structure. LECG is not a licensed CPA firm. www.lecg.com

Transition from Project Pinnacle to Human Resources

UltiPro Performance Management:

2

Development to Date

Drafted a new LECG core competency model and behavioral indicator framework

Designed a single annual review process, timeline and on-line review tool

Built the proposed competency model in UltiPro Performance Management (UPM)

Created training materials for the Competency Model and UPM functionality

Led the 2010 Annual Review Pilot Group Built a UPM Engagement Review

3

Outstanding Questions/Considerations Resource responsible for initiating/batching the annual

reviews Best practice for leveraging the manager review and self

review during the annual review meeting Identification of who should generally perform the following

roles in the annual review process: Reviewer Contributor Approver

Best Practice UPM Engagement Review Process Flow Incorporating Technical Career Track into UPM

4

UPM Annual Review

1. UPM Administrator Batches the Annual Review to Supervisors and related Employees

2. Employees and Managers are notified

3. Employee Completes the Review

4. Manager Completes the Review

5. The Employee and the Manager Meet to Discuss Review Details

6. The Employee Acknowledges the Review

UPM ANNUAL REVIEW PROCESS FLOW

5

UPM Engagement Review1. UPM Administrator Batches the Review to the Employee’s UltiPro

Supervisor

2. The Supervisor signs into UltiPro and Delegates the Engagement Review to the Appropriate Engagement Manager

3. The Employee will complete the Engagement Review

4. The Engagement Manager will Complete the Review

5. The Employee and the Manager will Meet to Discuss Review Details

6. The Employee will Acknowledge the Review

UPM ENGAGEMENT REVIEW PROCESS FLOW

6ALTERNATIVE ENGAGEMENT REVIEW PROCESS

Electronic SignaturesVast ApplicabilityUPM Document Library

Option: Typed Name as Electronic Signature

Process Flow:

1. Evaluator completes and electronically signs the engagement review

2. The employee acknowledges and electronically signs the engagement review

3. The Engagement Managing Director approves the Engagement Review by electronically signing the document sending it to HR for records

7

Key Objectives & Status

Task Status Notes/Action Plan

Conduct a UPM Annual Review Pilot

Complete. Two pilot sessions took place on 11/4/2010 and included approximately 75 individuals.

Completion of UPM Pilot Annual Review

Incomplete. The due date for all reviews is 12/3/2010. UltiPro will not lock out those who have not completed their reviews.

UPM Annual Review Training Materials

Complete. Captivates and Quick Reference Guides available on Connect: HR Administration> Talent Management Quick Links

Record Nimbus Process Flow of UPM Annual Review Process

Complete. The process has been recorded into the Nimbus LECG Transition State.

Build Engagement Review into UPM

Complete. The open-ended questions used in the current legacy Smart Engagement Review has been built into UPM.

8

Features Recommended/Review

Objectives Attachments Approvers Contributors Save Rating Scales & Competencies

9

2011 Roadmap

Finalize Competency Framework for the 2011 Annual Review Process

Pilot the LECG UPM Engagement Review Finalize process flow and approach

Distribute UPM Annual Review Company-wide in Q3

10

Roadmap Considerations

Conduct an Office and Engagement Manager survey to prescribe the most convenient format and process for the Engagement Review

Revise the UPM Annual Review form based on feedback from the pilot group, as needed

Continue to update the 2010 PMP Work Plan Go-live of all UltiPro Reviews will need change

management and SOP