Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has...

153
Updated January 2018

Transcript of Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has...

Page 1: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Updated January 2018

Page 2: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Module 1

Introduction

2

Page 3: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Course Overview

• Assumptions

• Purpose

• Course structure

3

Page 4: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Course Topics

• Credentialing & Privileging

– Application Process

– Initial Application

– Clinical Privileging

– Reappointment & Recredentialing

• Ongoing Monitoring

– Primary Source Verification

• Supporting Departmental Operations

• Your Study Strategy

• Knowledge Assessment Exercise 4

Page 5: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Key Course Resources

• Consolidated standards – AAAHC, HFAP,

NCQA, TJC, URAC

• Comparison of accreditation requirements for

verification of credentials

• Key healthcare regulatory requirements

• Medicare CoPs

• Overview of health plan delegation

• Meeting management chapter

• Parliamentary Motions Guide

5

Page 6: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Certification Commission of

NAMSS (CCN)• Certification program accredited by National

Commission For Certifying Agencies

– Independent authority for establishing standards

for certifications and operating policies

• Autonomous arm of NAMSS

– Protect against undue influence

The CCN does not develop, administer, sponsor, endorse, or financially benefit from any type of exam review,

preparatory course or published materials related to the content of the certification examinations. The purchase

and/or use of any exam preparation material does not guarantee a passing score on the exam.

6

Page 7: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Education Committee

• Determines educational needs • Identifies or develops resources to address

those needs• Assesses current educational offerings and

partnerships • Monitors ongoing effectiveness of all

educational activities• Oversees education activities

7

Page 8: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

CPCS Exam

150 multiple choice questions

– Credentialing and Privileging

55-63%

– Ongoing Monitoring 19-27%

– Supporting Departmental

Operations 13-24%

NOTE: Exam is assembled in April of each year and administered in the fall, spring and summer.

8

Page 9: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Exam Success

• On average, 404 people sit for the

exam every year.• From 2009 to 2017,

the average passing

rate for the exam

was 56%.

Year Pass Rate Fail Rate

2009 54% 46%

2010 59% 41%

2011 56% 44%

2012 60% 40%

2013 49% 51%

2014 58% 42%

2015 67% 33%

2016 47% 53%

2017 51% 49%

9

Page 10: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Medical Environments

Hospital

Health Plan

CVO

Provider Organizations

Ambulatory Care/

Surgery Center

10

Page 11: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Organizational Chart: Medical Staff

11

Page 12: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Hospital Credentialing Driven by:

Federal/State laws and

regulations

• Medicare CoPs

• Healthcare Quality Improvement Act

Accreditation standards

• The Joint Commission (TJC)

• Healthcare Facilities Accreditation Program (HFAP)

• Det Norske Veritas - National Integrated Accreditation for Healthcare Organizations (DNV GL)

• Center for Improvement in Healthcare Quality (CIHQ)

12

Page 13: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Hospital Credentialing Driven by:

Governing Documents:

• Hospital and Medical Staff Bylaws

• Medical Staff Rules and Regulations

• Hospital and Medical Staff Policies and Procedures

Standard of Care

• Legal aspect

13

Page 14: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Sample Organizational Chart:

Health Plans/Provider Organization

Director/Manager

Contracts Management

FinancialManagement

Client ServicesNetwork

Administration

Committee

14

Page 15: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Health Plan Credentialing Driven

by:• Federal/State laws and regulations

• Accreditation standards

– NCQA and URAC

• Policies and procedures

• Standard of care (legal aspect)

• Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information

Set (HEDIS)

• Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers

(CAHPS)

• CMS

15

Page 16: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Organizational Chart: CVOVaries Depending on Size

Director

Contracts/Sales Human

ResourcesCredentialing

StaffBus. Intel/IT/Data Analyst

16

Page 17: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

CVO Credentialing Driven by:

• Contract

• Policies and Procedures

• Accreditation Standards

– NCQA

– URAC

– The Joint Commission

– DNV GL

– HFAP

– CIHQ

17

Page 18: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Independent CVO vs.

Organizational CVO

• Contracts with many outside organizations

• Typically for-profit company

• Must satisfy the accreditation requirements/needs of customers

IndependentCVO

18

Page 19: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Independent CVO vs.

Organizational CVO

• Handles organization specific credentialing

• Bigger the system, the more “customers”

• May be structured as a part of the not-for-profit organization

• May be for-profit and have customers outside the organization

Healthcare Organization

CVO

19

Page 20: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Ambulatory Care/Surgery Center

Credentialing Driven By:– Accreditation standards

• AAAHC, TJC, NCQA, URAC, HFAP

– CMS regulations

– State and Federal law

– Policies and procedures

– Contractual agreements

• Ambulatory Care Governance Documents

– Policies and Procedures

– Bylaws

20

Page 21: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Review and Questions

21

Page 22: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Module 2

Credentialing and

Privileging

22

Page 23: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Exam Content Outline Summary

• Analyze initial application and supporting

documents

• Analyze reappointment/recredentialing

application and supporting documents

• Process initial and reappointment/

recredentialing applications using primary and

secondary/equivalent sources

• Compile, analyze, validate, and present

practitioner specific data

• Process practitioner requests for privileges 23

Page 24: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Credentialing and Privileging

Application Process

24

Page 25: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Process Overview

• Timeframe to process application defined in the

bylaws for policy and procedures

• Should not begin until:

• Application is complete

• Primary source verification is complete

• Current competency for privileges requested is

obtained• Complete vs Completed• Hospital vs Health Plan

25

Page 26: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Activity 2.1:

Application Processing Steps (Mixed up)

• Credentials Committee reviews/recommends to MEC• Verify completeness and that all requested materials are

included• Executive Committee reviews and recommends to

board• Notify applicant of final decision• Medical director reviews and make final decision• Process application: conduct PSV and verify current

competency for privileges requested• Board approval• Chief of Service/Department Chair reviews and

recommends • Application is received • Medical Director reviews and refers to credentials

committee• Process application, conduct PSV• Credentials Committee reviews/approves

26

Page 27: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Expedited Credentialing

• Medical staff develops criteria

• Governing body subcommittee, at

least 2

• Applicant for privileges is ineligible

if:

– Applicant submits an incomplete

application

– MEC final recommendation is

adverse or has limitations

27

Page 28: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Expedited Credentialing (continued)

• Case-by-case basis evaluations, usually resulting in ineligibility:

– Current or previously successful challenge to licensure or registration

– Involuntary termination of medical

staff membership at another

organization

– Involuntary limitation, reduction,

denial, or loss of clinical privileges

– Pattern of, or an excessive number of,

professional liability actions resulting

in a final judgment against the applicant28

Page 29: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Discussion

Steps in the application review

process

Created by D3images - Freepik.com

29

Page 30: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Review and Questions

30

Page 31: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

NCQA Provisional Credentialing

• Current application and signed attestation

• PSV of current, valid license

• PSV of past 5 years of malpractice claims or

settlements from the malpractice carrier, or

NPDB

• No more than 60 calendar days

• Medical Director can approve “clean” files;

other files go to Credentials Committee

31

Page 32: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Membership/ Appointment vs. Privileges

32

Page 33: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Membership/Appt. vs. Privileges

Membership/Appt.

The appointment to the

medical staff that grants a

practitioner specific rights,

responsibilities and

prerogatives including

voting, holding office,

committee appointments,

and dues.

Privileges

A description of the

clinical and patient care

activities of the

practitioner; each privilege

or core of privileges has

its own criteria based on

education, training,

experience, and

competence.

33

Page 34: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Membership/Appt. vs. Privileges

• Membership categories are described in medical

staff bylaws

• Membership criteria can be different than

criteria for privileges

• You can have membership without having

privileges

• You can have privileges without membership

• Some criteria are the same for both

membership and privileges (example: licensure)

34

Page 35: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Hospital Credentialing Communication

Communication of information regarding approval

of privileges:

– Orient practitioner to facility (mandated topics)

– Notify facility representatives

– Access by key personnel of

approved privileges

(scope of practice)

– No required timeframes

Created by Javi_indy - Freepik.com

35

Page 36: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

NCQA Credentialing Communication

• When information obtained during the

credentialing process varies substantially

between the source and the practitioner

• Committee decisions must be communicated

within 60 calendar days

• All initial credentialing decisions

• Recredentialing adverse decisions

• Notification of the following rights:

• Right to correct erroneous information

• Receive status of application upon request

• Right to review information submitted

36

Page 37: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

URAC Credentialing Communication

Credentialing decisions must be

communicated, in writing, within 10

business days.

37

Page 38: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Review and Questions

38

Page 39: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Credentialing and Privileging

Initial Application

39

Page 40: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Activity 3.1: Application

Challenges• Work with your table to identify worst case

situations occurring during the initial application

phase

• Elect one person to describe the issue in one

minute or less

40

Page 41: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

RED FLAGS

41

Page 42: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Activity 3.2: Red Flag

• Review your scenario

• Discuss if the scenario

represents a red flag

• If it is a red flag, why is

it red?

• What is the

appropriate follow up

process?

• Report your decision

to group

42

Page 43: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

NCQA Application Timeframes:

Completion of Application Process

• Organization defines timeframe

• NCQA does not require a timeframe for

completion, but does set time limits on specific

credentialing items

– 180 days on licensure, malpractice history,

Medicare/Medicaid, board certification, and

licensure sanctions

– 365 days for work history

– Attestation signature

– 60 days less for CVO

43

Page 44: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Advanced Practice Clinicians

LIP vs. Non-LIP – Defined by individual organization based on state regulations, accreditation standards, bylaws

NCQA – Organization defines, requires credentialing for non-physician practitioners who have an independent relationship with the organization, and who provide care

The Joint Commission – LIPs, APRNs, and PAs must be privileged

HFAP – addresses practitioners functioning under supervision who provide a medical level of care or perform surgical procedures

44

Page 45: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Consent and Release Form

Key element #1:

Applicant consents to disclosure and releases

from liability the organization, its employees/

representatives, and affiliates, when gathering,

obtaining, and exchanging documents, records,

and other information pertaining to his or her

application.

45

Page 46: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Consent and Release Form

Key element #2:

Applicant authorizes any third parties to release

information concerning his or her:

• Qualifications

• Credentials

• Clinical competence

• Quality assurance data

• Information pertaining to

character

• Physical or mental health condition

• Behavior, ethics• Claims history• Disciplinary action• Any other matter

reasonably having a bearing on his or her qualifications

46

Page 47: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

NCQA Attestation Form

• Must include an attestation, by the practitioner

ONLY, to the correctness and completeness of

the application.

• Verification time limit is 365 days.

47

Page 48: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Activity 3.3:

Application Review Exercise

• Review each hospital profile

• Review the application form

• Discuss and respond to questions

– Does applicant meet criteria for membership?

– What issues need to be resolved?

– What should communication to applicant include?

– Appropriate consent and release form

– Is an electronic signature acceptable on consent

and release form?

48

Page 49: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

CME

• Specialty specific

• Accrediting bodies

require documentation

and it is considered in

reappointment/

reprivileging decisions

• Appropriate

documentation of CME

49

Page 50: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Due Process

• Hospital – fair hearing (MS process), appeal

(board process)

– May differ for medical staff members vs non-

members

• Health Plans & Provider Organizations –

practitioner appeal rights under NCQA

• HCQIA defines due process requirements for

healthcare entities

• State regulations contain rules for both hospital

and health plans & provider organizations

• Bylaws and policies must meet the most strict

requirement – State or Federal50

Page 51: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Initial Application Recap

51

Page 52: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Review and Questions

52

Page 53: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Credentialing and Privileging

Clinical Privileging

53

Page 54: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Clinical Privileging

Granting approval for an individual to perform a specific procedure or specific set of clinical and patient

care activities based on documented competence in the specialty in which privileges are requested.

54

Page 55: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Privileges Should Be:Documented, objective, evidence-based process

Based on defined criteria (training, experience, demonstrated current

competence)

Based on services provided (or soon to be provided) at the

facility/location

Consistently applied

Continually monitored (FPPE/OPPE)

Approval process usually mirrors application approval process

55

Page 56: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Privileging System Considerations

• Core vs. Laundry vs. Category

• Developing minimum threshold criteria

• Special procedures

• Approval of forms

• Privilege form maintenance

56

Page 57: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

When to Develop New Criteria

• New technology or

procedure

• New service added to

hospital

• New specialist

57

Page 58: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Adding New Privileges

• First determine:

– Board approval for the service/procedure

– Required equipment

– Necessary support staff

58

Page 59: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

New Privileges: Issues

• Does the hospital support the new procedure?

• What training/experience is required?

• Are there any other requirements?

– CME, board certification, training course, peer

recommendations

• Will proctoring be required?

59

Page 60: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

New Privileges: Issues

• What is the evaluation process for new

criteria/forms?

• How will this be implemented?

• How will we follow up/review quality?

• Who will be able to do it? (turf issues)

60

Page 61: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Telemedicine Privileges

61

Page 62: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Telemedicine Overview

• The use of medical information exchanged from

one site to another via electronic

communications.

– It is not a separate medical specialty – just

another way of providing services.

• Originating site

– The site where the patient is located at the time

the service is provided.

• Distant site

– The site where the practitioner providing the

professional service is located.62

Page 63: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Why Use Telemedicine?

• Access to providers

– Provide healthcare and services

that would not be available

otherwise

– Specialty care consultations for

isolated specialists, practitioners

• Eliminate expensive travel

• Reduce need to move patient

• Provide CME for isolated

healthcare providers

63

Page 64: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Temporary Privileges

• Who can grant?• Under what

circumstances can TP be granted?

• For how long can TP be granted?

64

Page 65: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Locum Tenens

A medical practitioner who temporarily takes the place of another

65

Page 66: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Emergency Privileges

Allows physicians to perform tasks outside of their existing privileges to save a patient’s life, limb, or organ

66

Page 67: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Disaster Privileges

• Include in Emergency Operations Plan

• Should have mechanism for oversight of volunteers

• Define requirements for credentialing

• Volunteers should only function within the scope of their license/ certification

67

Page 68: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Activity 4.1:

Temporary Privilege Exercise

• Review sample bylaws and scenario

• Discuss whether or not it is appropriate to

grant TP

• Discuss what information needs to be verified

to meet TJC standards and bylaws

68

Page 69: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Activity 4.2:

Privileging/Terminology Exercise

Review Column A and match terms

with meaning in Column B.

69

Page 70: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Privileges Recap

Created by Peoplecreations - Freepik.com

70

Page 71: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Review and Questions

71

Page 72: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Credentialing and Privileging

Reappointment/Recredentialing

Process

72

Page 73: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Hospital Process

• Submit application that meets requirements

• Timeframe: 2 years for CMS, TJC, and HFAP

• Primary source verification

• CME

• Competency evaluation (related to privileges) :

– For LIPs: OPPE/quality monitoring

– Non-LIPs brought to the hospital by LIPs –

performance evaluations at same interval as

employees in same discipline (TJC)

– Peer recommendations

• Approval process: same as initial application

73

Page 74: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Health Plan/Provider

Organization Process• Must submit application that meets specific

requirements

• Timeframe: 3 years for AAAHC, URAC, NCQA

• Scope of practitioners recredentialed are defined

in policies and procedures

• Approval process is same as initial application

74

Page 75: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Activity 5.1:

Recredentialing/Reappointment

• Review scenario

• Discuss and list options

• Pick one person from your table to

report

75

Page 76: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Hospital Leave of Absence

• The practitioner’s current appointment cannot

extend beyond 2 years.

• Medical Staff Bylaws should outline the process

for requesting a leave of absence.

• Considerations when a practitioner takes a

leave of absence:

– Allow the reappointment to lapse and conduct

full credentialing of the practitioner upon their

return;

– Process the practitioner’s reappointment during

their leave of absence. 76

Page 77: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Health Plan/Provider Organization

Leave of Absence

If the organization cannot recredential a practitioner within the 36-month time frame because the practitioner is on active military

assignment, maternity leave or sabbatical, the organization documents this and recredentials the practitioner within 60 calendar days of the

practitioner’s return to practice.

77

Page 78: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Reappointment/

Recredentialing Process Recap

78

Page 79: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Review and Questions

79

Page 80: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Module 3

Verification and Ongoing

Monitoring

80

Page 81: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Exam Content Outline Summary

• Monitor and evaluate practitioner sanctions,

complaints, and adverse data

• Verify and document expirables

81

Page 82: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Ongoing Monitoring

Primary Source Verification

82

Page 83: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Overview

• Primary source verification (PSV) is required by

all accrediting bodies

• Requirements vary by organization

– The Joint Commission (TJC)

– NCQA

– URAC

– AAAHC

– HFAP

NOTE: Check our NAMSS online resources and

standards comparison grid83

Page 84: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Verification Sources

Sources

Primary SecondaryTJC Designated

Equivalent

NCQA Approved

84

Page 85: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

What are some appropriate

ways to document

PSV?

85

Page 86: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

PSV Challenge Game

86

Page 87: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

PSV Challenge Game Rules

• Points are given for each correct answer and

increase along with the difficulty of the

question.

• The time limit is 30 seconds.

• When team comes up with the answer, indicate

that they are ready.

• Contestant teams can ask their audience team

for help one time (this is done at the end of the

time limit).

• A contestant can resign, but not until the

current question has been answered.87

Page 88: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

•Per NCQA, is the ABMS Certification Matters, accessible through the ABMS Web site, an acceptable source for verifying board certification for an MD?

10 Points

88

Page 89: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Correct Answer

No.

This site is intended for

consumer reference only and

is not considered PSV.

89

Page 90: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

•TJC requires licensure to be verified with the primary source at what four times?

10 Points

90

Page 91: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Correct Answer

1. Initial granting

2. Renewal of privileges

3. Revision of privileges

4. At the time of license expiration

91

Page 92: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

•According to TJC, the hospital must query the National Practitioner Data Bank at what three times?

25 Points

92

Page 93: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Correct Answer

When:

1. Clinical privileges are initially granted

2. Renewal of privileges

• Renewal of privileges is pertinent to

returning from a leave of absence

3. A new privilege(s) is requested

93

Page 94: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

10 Bonus Points

•Can the hospital accept an NPDB self-query performed by a physician to satisfy TJC’s requirement for NPDB query?

10 Points

94

Page 95: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Correct Answer

No.

The hospital or its designated

agent must perform the query.

95

Page 96: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

•According to NCQA standards, on initial credentialing, an organization must verify sanctions or limitations on licensure in each state where the practitioner holds or has ever held licensure.

25 Points- True

or False:

96

Page 97: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Correct Answer

False.

The organization must verify

sanctions or limitations on

licensure in each state where

the practitioner provides care

to members.

97

Page 98: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

•According to NCQA standards, on initial credentialing, an organization must verify that the practitioner’s Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) or Controlled Dangerous Substances (CDS) certificate is valid and current in each state where the practitioner has ever practiced.

10 BonusPoints-True or False

98

Page 99: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Correct Answer

False.

The organization must verify

sanctions or limitations on

licensure in each state where

the practitioner provides care

to members.

99

Page 100: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

•According to HFAP Standards, in addition to querying the specialty board directly, what other sources can be used to verify board certification?

50 Points

100

Page 101: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Correct Answer

• If certified by a member board of

ABMS, verify with ABMS.

• If certified by a specialty board of

AOA, verify with AOA Official

Osteopathic Physician Profile.

101

Page 102: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

According to AAAHC standards, is it appropriate to use information from another healthcare organization, i.e. hospital or group practice that has conducted PSV for credentialing?

50 Points

102

Page 103: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Correct Answer

Yes.

Provided the other healthcare

organization supplies the PSV directly,

without transmission or involvement

by the applicant or other third party.

103

Page 104: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

According to TJC standards, peer recommendation must include written info on six elements. Five of these are:

Patient Care

Current Medical Clinical Knowledge

Practice-based Learning & Improvement

Interpersonal & Communication Skills

System-based Practice

100 Points

What is the sixth element that must be included in a peer

recommendation?

104

Page 105: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Correct Answer

Professionalism

105

Page 106: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

•Name three of the four appropriate sources for peer recommendations according to TJC standards.

25 Bonus Points

106

Page 107: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Correct Answer

1. Performance improvement committee, majority members are the applicant’s peers

2. A reference letter(s), written documentation, or documented telephone conversation(s) about the applicant from a peer(s) who is knowledgeable about the applicant’s professional performance and competence

3. A department or major clinical service chairperson who is a peer

4. The medical staff executive committee

107

Page 108: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

•Per NCQA, is it acceptable to use confirmation from the state licensing agency in lieu of verification of education, residency training, and board certification?

100 Points

108

Page 109: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Correct Answer

Yes.If the state agency performs primary-

source verification of these elements

and, at least annually, the

organization obtains written

confirmation from the state licensing

agency that it performs primary-

source verification.109

Page 110: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

•Name the accrediting body that requires criminal background checks.

25 Bonus Points

110

Page 111: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Correct Answer

HFAP

111

Page 112: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

•According to AAAHC, ____________ must be monitored on an ongoing basis.

25 Bonus Points

112

Page 113: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Correct Answer

1. Expirables2. Aspects of patient care

113

Page 114: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

•Name the six Joint Commission designated equivalent sources and the elements that can be verified by using them.

Bonus Round:

20 points

for each correct answer

114

Page 115: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Correct Answer (20 Pts. Each)

1. AMA Physician Masterfile for a physician’s U.S. or Puerto

Rican medical school graduation and residency completion

2. American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) for a

physician’s board certification

3. ECFMG for a physician’s graduation from a foreign medical

school

4. AOA Physician Database for a physician’s predoctoral

education accredited by the AOA Bureau of Professional

Education, postdoctoral education approved by the AOA

Council on Postdoctoral Training, and Osteopathic Specialty

Board Certification

5. FSMB for all actions against a physician’s medical license

6. American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA) Profile

for the physician assistant education and NCCPA

certification, provided through the AMA Physician Profile. 115

Page 116: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

NCQA Ongoing Monitoring

• Medicare and Medicaid sanctions

• Sanctions or limitations on licensure

• Collecting and reviewing complaints

• Collecting and reviewing information from

identified adverse events

• Collecting and reviewing quality issues

• Implementing appropriate interventions when

instances of poor quality are identified

116

Page 117: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Expirables

• Licensure

• State Controlled Substance

• DEA

• Professional Liability (certificate of insurance)

• Other (facility specific requirements)

117

Page 118: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Verification and Ongoing Monitoring

Recap

118

Page 119: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Review and Questions

119

Page 120: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Module 4

Supporting Departmental

Operations

120

Page 121: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Exam Content Outline Summary

• Participate in internal and external audits

• Prepare and document meetings

121

Page 122: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Managing and Archiving Files

122

• Paper

• Electronic

• Policy for retention

Page 123: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

File Audits

• Help verify compliance with the requirements

of bylaws, accrediting agencies, and state and

federal regulations.

• Tools should include availability of necessary

documentation and completion within the

required timeframe.

• Corrective action plan should be developed and

implemented, if necessary.

123

Page 124: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Database Audits

Created by Bearfotos - Freepik.com

124

• Garbage In = Garbage Out• Evaluate data accuracy:

– Run report from credentialing database containing information

– Compare data with information

from credentials file (if you are

paperless, the database is your

credentials file)

– Look for missing data

– Correct discrepancies

– Rerun report to verify accuracy

• Audit who is accessing database to assure no breach in confidentiality

Page 125: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Integrity of Database Data

Data integrity refers to

maintaining and assuring the

accuracy and consistency

of data over its entire life-

cycle.

Data preservation refers to

the activities necessary to

ensure continued access to

digital materials for as long as

necessary.

125

Page 126: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Provider Directories

• Health Plan & Provider Organizations

– Need a process for ensuring that listings in

practitioner directories and other materials for

members are consistent with credentialing data

including education, training, certification and

specialty

• Hospital

– Patients and staff need to have current information

– Need current listings for contracted insurance

plans

126

Page 127: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Delegated Credentialing

Oversight and Audit (NCQA)

• Yearly documentation of substantive evaluation

and actions plans, if needed

• Must be based on the responsibilities stated in

the delegation document and the appropriate

NCQA standards

• Exception to annual audit requirement: if the

delegate is an NCQA-accredited or -certified

organization in the areas of credentialing and

recredentialing

127

Page 128: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

NCQA Audit of Delegated Entity

• The organization remains accountable for credentialing and recredentialing its practitioners, even if it delegates all or part of these activities.

• Delegated agreement:– Is mutually agreed upon

– Describes the responsibilities of the organization and delegated entity

– Describes the delegated activities

– Requires at least semiannual reporting to the organization

– Describes the process by which the organization evaluates the delegated entity's performance

– Describes the remedies available to the organization if the delegated entity does not fulfill its obligations, including revocation of the delegation agreement

128

Page 129: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Other Documents That Require

Similar Review Processes

• Bylaws

• Policies and procedures

• Rules and regulations

• Privileges

129

Page 130: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Meeting Management

• Performing and coordinating meeting logistics

• Documentation preparation

• Follow-up

130

Page 131: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Fundamentals of Meeting

Management

• Regularly scheduled meetings

• Preparation for meeting may include:

– Development of an agenda

– Notification of Members

– Preparation of files and other packets of information

to be distributed, emailed and/or presented

– Arrangement of meeting logistics

– Body of meeting

– Adjournment

– Minutes/Follow-up131

Page 132: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Parliamentary Procedure

(aka Robert’s Rules of Order)

• Standard for facilitating discussions and group

decision-making

• Four motions are used in smaller committee or

board meetings to:

– Introduce (motion)

– Change a motion (amend)

– Adopt (accept a report without discussion)

– Adjourn (end the meeting)

132

Page 133: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Activity 7.1: Parliamentary

Puzzler• Using the grid provided select the appropriate

steps for conducting a meeting in accordance to

Robert’s Rules of Order.

• Refer to the Parliamentary Procedures provided

in the resource material.

133

Page 134: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Operations Recap

134

Page 135: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Review and Questions

135

Page 136: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Module 5

Your Study Strategy

136

Page 137: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

The Key to Success

Be Prepared!137

Page 138: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Prepare to Succeed

• Know the exam

• Know how to answer multiple choice

questions

• Understand test-taking strategies

• Explore learning strategies

• Create a study plan

• Implement the plan!

138

Page 139: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

What Do You Think?

• Every exam is a reading test.

• Knowing a little can be dangerous;

knowing a lot can be disastrous.

• Manage information to prepare, manage

time to pass.

• Be a test-maker, not just a test-taker.

139

Page 140: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Test Taking Strategies

• Read the directions.

• Read all the questions.

• Answer the ones you know first.

• Come back to the hard ones.

• Read all the answers.

• Look for the best answer, not just a correct

answer.

• Your first answer is usually the correct one.140

Page 141: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Answering Tough Questions

• Read the question

– Look for key words

• Read all the answers

– Cross off the obviously wrong ones

– Give each answer the “true-false”

test

– Question options that:

• Are totally unfamiliar to you

• Contain negative or absolute words

141

Page 142: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Sample Questions

Which hospital department would supply a

weekly delinquency report for patient

records?

a. Administration

b. Health Information Management

c. Inpatient Services

142

Page 143: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Sample Questions

Which BEST describes the process of delegated

credentialing?

a. One accredited organization allows another

accredited organization to perform primary source

verification on its behalf.

b. An HMO allows a CVO to assume final responsibility

for credentialing/recredentialing decision-making.

c. An organization grants, by mutual agreement,

responsibility to another organization to perform a

specified scope of credentialing/recredentialing

activities.143

Page 144: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Sample QuestionsAccording to TJC, how is a practitioner's quality of care assessed during the reappointment process?

a. Analysis of financial costs associated with performed procedures

b. Analysis of medically complex cases managed and treated by the practitioner

c. Review of aggregate data, information, and clinical performance evaluations

144

Page 145: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Guessing • Test score is based on

the number of right

answers.

• There is NO penalty

for guessing.

• Eliminate the answers

that are clearly wrong.

• Take your best guess

from what’s left.

145

Page 146: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Learning Strategies Exercise

• Visual strategies

• Auditory strategies

• Kinesthetic strategies

• Work with group to develop a varied list of

effective study strategies

146

Page 147: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Three Keys to Success

Don’t Cram!

Don’t Cram!

Don’t Cram!

147

Page 148: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Study Skills

• Studying can be habit forming.

• Create a supportive studying environment.

• Learn high level concepts first then drill down

to the detail.

• Use mnemonics.

• Take breaks.

• Keep a reminder pad handy.

148

Page 149: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Develop Your Strategy

Complete study plan worksheet in your

participant guide

149

Page 150: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Form a Study Group

• Keep on schedule

• Share learning strategies

• Share expertise – teach others!

• In person, online, or over the phone

150

Page 151: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Review and Questions

151

Page 152: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Module 6

Assess Your Knowledge

152

Page 153: Updated January 2018 - NAMSS Resources... · –MEC final recommendation is adverse or has limitations 27. Expedited Credentialing (continued) • Case-by-case basis evaluations,

Thank You!

153