Untangling equations involving uncertainty

32
Untangling equations involving uncertainty Scott Ferson, Applied Biomathematics Vladik Kreinovich, University of Texas at El Paso W. Troy Tucker, Applied

description

Untangling equations involving uncertainty. Scott Ferson , Applied Biomathematics Vladik Kreinovich, University of Texas at El Paso W. Troy Tucker, Applied Biomathematics. Overview. Three kinds of operations Deconvolutions Backcalculations Updates (oh, my!) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Page 1: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Scott Ferson, Applied BiomathematicsVladik Kreinovich, University of Texas at El PasoW. Troy Tucker, Applied Biomathematics

Page 2: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Overview• Three kinds of operations

– Deconvolutions– Backcalculations– Updates (oh, my!)

• Very elementary methods of interval analysis– Low-dimensional– Simple arithmetic operations

• But combined with probability theory

Page 3: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Probability box (p-box)• Bounds on a cumulative distribution function (CDF)• Envelope of a Dempster-Shafer structure• Used in risk analysis and uncertainty arithmetic• Generalizes probability distributions and intervals

This is an interval, nota uniform distribution

Cum

ulat

ive

prob

abili

ty

0 10 20 30 400

0.5

1

10 20 30 400

0.5

1

10 20 300

0.5

1

Page 4: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Probability bounds analysis (PBA)

assumingindependence

0 800

1

assumingnothing

1

0 800

0 400

1

0 200

1

CD

F

assumingindependence

0 800

1

Page 5: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

PBA handles common problems

• Imprecisely specified distributions• Poorly known or unknown dependencies• Non-negligible measurement error• Inconsistency in the quality of input data• Model uncertainty and non-stationarity

• Plus, it’s much faster than Monte Carlo

Page 6: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Updating

• Using knowledge of how variables are related to tighten their estimates

• Removes internal inconsistency and explicates unrecognized knowledge

• Also called constraint updating or editing

• Also called natural extension

Page 7: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Example

• SupposeW = [23, 33]H = [112, 150]A = [2000, 3200]

• Does knowing W H = A let us to say any more?

Page 8: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Answer

• Yes, we can infer thatW = [23, 28.57] H = [112, 139.13] A = [2576, 3200]

• The formulas are just W = intersect(W, A/H), etc.

To get the largest possible W, for instance, let A be as large as possible and H as small as possible, and solve for W =A/H.

Page 9: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Bayesian strategy

20003200])3200,2000[(

112150])150,112[(

2333])33,23[(),,Pr(

AIHIWIAHW

)(),,|( HWAAHWHWAL

),,Pr()()|,,( AHWHWAHWAAHWf

Prior

Likelihood

Posterior

Page 10: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Bayes’ rule

• Concentrates mass onto the manifold of feasible combinations of W, H, and A

• Answers have the same supports as intervals

• Computationally complex• Needs specification of priors• Yields distributions that are not justified

(come from the choice of priors)• Expresses less uncertainty than is present

Page 11: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Updating with p-boxes

2000 3000 40000

1

A20 30 40

0

1

W120 140 160

0

1

H

Page 12: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

2000 3000 40000

1

A20 30 40

0

1

W120 140 160

0

1

H

Answers

intersect(W, A/H) intersect(H, A/W) intersect(A, WH)

Page 13: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Calculation with p-boxes

• Agrees with interval analysis whenever inputs are intervals

• Relaxes Bayesian strategy when precise priors are not warranted

• Produces more reasonable answers when priors not well known

• Much easier to compute than Bayes’ rule

Page 14: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Backcalculation

• Find constraints on B that ensure C = A + B satisfies specified constraints

• Or, more generally, C = f(A1, A2,…, Ak, B)

• If A and C are intervals, the answer is called the tolerance solution

Page 15: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Can’t just invert the equation

When conc is put back into the forward equation, the dose is wider than planned

dose body mass intakeconc =

conc intake body massdose =

Page 16: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Exampledose = [0, 2] milligram per kilogramintake = [1, 2.5] litermass = [60, 96] kilogram

conc = dose * mass / intake [ 0, 192] milligram liter-1

dose = conc * intake / mass [ 0, 8] milligram kilogram-1

Doses 4 times larger than tolerable levels!

Page 17: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Backcalculating probability distributions

• Needed for engineering design problems, e.g., cleanup and remediation planning for environmental contamination

• Available analytical algorithms are unstable for almost all problems

• Except in a few special cases, Monte Carlo simulation cannot compute backcalculations; trial and error methods are required

Page 18: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Backcalculation with p-boxesSuppose A + B = C, where

A = normal(5, 1)C = {0 C, median 15, 90th %ile 35, max 50}

2 3 4 5 6 7 80

1 A

-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 600

1 C

Page 19: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Getting the answer

• The backcalculation algorithm basically reverses the forward convolution

• Not hard at all…but a little messy to show• Any distribution

totally inside B is sure to satisfy the constraint … it’s “kernel”

-10 0 10 20 30 40 500

1 B

Page 20: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Check by plugging back in

A + B = C* C

-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 600

1

C* C

Page 21: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

When you Know that

A + B = C

A – B = C

A B = C

A / B = C

A ^ B = C

2A = C

A² = C

And you have estimates for

A, BA, CB ,CA, BA, CB ,CA, BA, CB ,CA, BA, CB ,CA, BA, CB ,C

ACAC

Use this formulato find the unknownC = A + BB = backcalc(A,C)A = backcalc (B,C)C = A – BB = –backcalc(A,C)A = backcalc (–B,C)C = A * BB = factor(A,C)A = factor(B,C)C = A / BB = 1/factor(A,C)A = factor(1/B,C)C = A ^ BB = factor(log A, log C)A = exp(factor(B, log C))C = 2 * AA = C / 2C = A ^ 2A = sqrt(C)

Page 22: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Kernels

• Existence more likely if p-boxes are fat• Wider if we can also assume independence• Answers are not unique, even though

tolerance solutions always are• Different kernels can emphasize different

properties• Envelope of all possible kernels is the shell

(i.e., the united solution)

Page 23: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Precise distributions

• Precise distributions can’t express the nature of the target

• Finding a conc distribution that results in a prescribed distribution of doses says we want some doses to be high (any distribution to the left would be even better)

• We need to express the dose target as a p-box

Page 24: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Deconvolution

• Uses information about dependence to tighten estimates

• Useful, for instance, in correcting an estimated distribution for measurement uncertainty

• For instance, suppose Y = X + • If X and are independent, Y² = X² + ² • Then we do an uncertainty correction

Page 25: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Example

• Y = X + • Y, ~ normal• X ~ N(decon(Y, X), sqrt(decon(², Y²))

• Y ~ N([5,9], [2,3]); ~ N([1,+1], [½,1])• X ~ N(dcn([1,1],[5,6]), sqrt(dcn([¼,1],[4,9])))• X ~ N([6,8], sqrt([3, 63])

Page 26: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Deconvolutions with p-boxes

• As for backcalculations, computation of deconvolutions is troublesome in probability theory, but often much simpler with p-boxes

• Deconvolution didn’t have an analog in interval analysis (until now via p-boxes)

Page 27: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Relaxing over-determination

• Most constraint problems almost never have solutions with probability distributions

• The constraints are too numerous and strict

• P-boxes relax these constraints so that many problems can have solutions

Page 28: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

P-boxes in interval analysis

• P-boxes bring probability distributions into the realm of intervals

• Express and solve backcalculation problems better than is possible in probability theory by itself

• Generalize the notion of tolerance solutions (kernels)

• Relax unwarranted assumptions about priors in updating problems needed in a Bayesian approach

• Introduce deconvolution into interval analysis

Page 29: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

Acknowledgments

• Janos Hajagos, Stony Brook University• Lev Ginzburg, Stony Brook University• David Myers, Applied Biomathematics

• National Institutes of Health SBIR program

Page 30: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

End

Page 31: Untangling equations involving uncertainty
Page 32: Untangling equations involving uncertainty

20000

1

110 120 130 140 150 1600

1

H

20 30 400

1

W