UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-PLATTEVILLE REQUEST FOR …

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-PLATTEVILLE

REQUEST FOR

DESIGN SERVICES

OTTENSMAN HALL RENOVATION PRE-DESIGN STUDY

September 2021

DFD # 21I1Q

CONSULTANT REQUIREMENTS Architectural/Engineering/Planning (Rev. 2021-07)

09/2/2021 UW-PLATTEVILLE | Ottensman Hall Renovation Pre-Design Study | Request for AEP Services | Project No. 21H1Z Page 1 of 7

This request provides architectural/engineering/planning (AEP) resources to complete the project phases indicated below for Project No. 21I1Q– Ottensman Hall Renovation Pre-Design Study at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville (see attached for further detail).

Pre-Design Phase Preliminary Design Phase Final Design Phase Bidding Phase Construction Phase

Consultants should submit their qualifications and demonstrate specific expertise and experience in the design and coordination of Pre-Design Studies including facility programming and space consulting, building renovation feasibility assessment with particular focus on building envelope analysis, renovation scoping, space needs assessment and space fit analysis, renovation construction phasing options, and construction cost estimates as part of a design team. Work includes project area surveys, acquiring field data, and verifying as-built conditions to assure accurate development of the Pre-Design Study. The consultant(s) will participate in a highly collaborative and interactive campus planning process by meeting with appropriate campus staff, including UW-Platteville Provost/Provost’s designee, and Facilities Management Staff to develop a Pre-Design Study and documentation. Working in collaboration with the campus project team, the consultant will be responsible for Pre-Design Study development, verification, and documentation. The design consultant(s) will provide Pre-Design services as indicated in the current Division of Facilities Development and Management (DFDM) Guideline for Developing Program Statements and Feasibility Studies for Projects Requiring Enumeration, and/or the Policy and Procedure Manual for Architects/Engineers and Consultants], and the DFDM Contract for Professional Services. These services may be contracted through multiple contracts or contracts with multiple parts and project-specific review/approval/authorization milestones as determined by the needs of the project. Authorization for subsequent services will be issued in writing upon satisfactory performance and completion of contracted services and deliverables. PRE-DESIGN SERVICES In addition to the requirements for pre-design in the DFDM Guideline for Developing Program Statements and Feasibility Studies for Projects Requiring Enumeration and/or the Policy and Procedure Manual for Architects/Engineers and Consultants, the following addition and clarifications should be noted:

• Complete a space needs assessment and space fit analysis. • Complete an Ottensman Hall renovation feasibility assessment, with particular focus on existing condition of the building envelope, and

renovation scoping. Develop construction phasing options. Develop conceptual construction cost estimates, COST ESTIMATING Provide conceptual construction cost estimates for all design alternatives. All conceptual estimates for a selected design alternative must provide construction cost detail with a dated reference for ease of future cost escalation. All project cost estimates not directly associated with the construction costs (basic and additional design services, project management fees, design contingency, project contingency, movable and special equipment, escalation factors) must be indicated separately from the conceptual construction cost estimates. DELIVERABLES Produce a Pre-Design Study document with narrative descriptions of each project component and implementation phase, executive summary, preliminary construction cost estimates, The narrative descriptions must include functions, occupant capacity/limits, and building/structure requirements,. The executive summary will include all planning findings, project goals and principles, key recommendations, and an implementation plan. All graphics must be grayscale compatible without losing meaning, distinguishing characteristics, or legibility. All final documentation must be provided electronically via download link, USB flash drive, or optical disc (CD or DVD) in Adobe Acrobat PDF format. All narrative text and cost estimate documentation shall also be provided in an unlocked, editable file format for future use and presentation outside of the final Feasibility Study document. Text shall be provided in rich text format (*.RTF) or Microsoft Word XML document format (*.DOCX) and cost estimates provided in Microsoft Excel XML workbook format (*.XLSX). The content of the editable file formats must match the content of the final Feasibility Study document, but the organization, layout, and formatting needs only to be representative of the final content. All graphics, images, maps, plans, and renderings must be provided in electronic format separate from the master plan document in high-resolution 300 pixels per inch (ppi) raster format (*.PNG), suitable for poster size (minimum 24-inches by 36-inches) publication. All graphics, images, maps, plans, renderings, models, and documentation will become the property of the university. PRELIMINARY DESIGN SERVICES

CONSULTANT REQUIREMENTS Architectural/Engineering/Planning (Rev. 2021-07)


In addition to the requirements for preliminary design through construction in the DFDM Policy and Procedure Manual for Architects/Engineers and Consultants, the following additions and clarifications should be noted:

• The design consultant(s) will work with DFDM and the appropriate campus staff to review the Pre-Design Study, The reviewers will provide written comments to the DFDM Project Manager based on the documents and discuss the comments with the design consultant(s). The design consultant(s) are required to provide written responses to the DFDM Project Manager.

Note that per the DFDM Policy and Procedure Manual for Architects/Engineers and Consultants, the following services will not be included in the scope of services:

• Hazardous material abatement design will be provided by a consultant under separate contract with DFDM based on the demolition plans. Abatement documents will be incorporated into the bid set.

• Preparation of a Wisconsin Environmental Protection Act (WEPA)Type III Environmental Impact Statement will be contracted separately. It is expected that the AEP team will participate in providing drawings, data, and design details to the WEPA consultant and attend at least one public information meeting to present the project on Type II EIA projects and up to three public meetings for full Type I EIS projects.

The following documents are available for review and reference:

2015 Academic Buildings Feasibility Study Volumes 1 & 2 DFD # *2L1K) 2011 Comprehensive Campus Master Plan DFD # (10F1F) Firms interested in downloading / accessing the above studies should contact:

Katrina Hecimovic <[email protected]> 608.342-1155

BASIC SERVICES Architectural/Engineering/Planning (Rev. 2021-07)


ID Y/N? Description Comments and Clarification Notes 1.00 Project and Program Considerations For Feasibility Studies, Project and Program Considerations

items that are selected to recognize that the documentation and professional guidance required to develop the required support documentation is above and beyond the traditional 10% concept report, but not necessarily completing the full 35% preliminary design efforts.

1.01 Programming & Program Verification 1.02 Design Concept 1.03 Site/Survey 1.04 Site/Existing Conditions (evaluate Ottensman Bldg. envelope) 1.05 Facilities Site Plan 1.06 Existing Land Use 1.07 Topography/Drainage 1.08 Vegetation/Landscaping 1.09 Subsurface Conditions 1.10 Construction Staging/Occupancy of Site During Construction 1.11 WEPA – Environmental Impact Determination and Identification 1.12 Utilities/Infrastructure 1.13 Includes the utility capacity

1.13 Existing: capacity and condition of existing lines and equipment 1.14 Proposed central and site utility systems 1.15 Maintaining utility services and infrastructure during construction 1.16 Transportation/Circulation 1.17 Vehicular/Bicycle/Pedestrian 1.18 Parking 1.19 Service/Loading/Unloading 1.20 Access to Site 1.21 Existing Building Conditions 1.22 Conditions of Existing Building Spaces as necessary for design 1.23 Condition of Existing Infrastructure and Equipment 1.24 Demolition Planning/Phasing 1.25 Building Systems 1.26 Structural Systems 1.27 Mechanical Systems/HVAC 1.28 Environmental Control 1.29 Electrical/Lighting 1.30 Lighting Design 1.31 Fire Alarm 1.32 Telecommunications Systems 1.33 Access Control 1.34 Plumbing 1.35 Fire Protection Systems 1.36 Signage (Code Required; Building and Room/Space Identification) 1.37 Other Systems 2.00 Design Considerations

2.01 Cost Estimating (develop conceptual total project cost estimate) 2.02 Constructability 2.03 Accessibility 2.04 Sustainable Facilities and Energy Conservation 2.05 Equipment Layout 2.06 Campus Technical Review 3.00 Bid Documents (see contract for details) 4.00 Construction Administration (see contract for details) 4.01 Commissioning (Level 1) 5.00 Post-Construction Deliverables (see contract for details) 5.01 As-Built Record Drawings 5.02 Commissioning Details 5.03 Operations and Maintenance Manuals 5.04 Warranty/Guarantee Details

SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES Architectural/Engineering/Planning (Rev. 2021-07)


This project provides a comprehensive, campus-wide space needs, use, and suitability analysis for current and anticipated future needs. The analysis, conclusions, determinations, and recommendations from this effort will be used as the basis for a campus-wide space use plan and for multiple future campus planning and capital project initiatives. This effort will comply with the UW System Administration Physical Planning Goals and Principles <https://www.wisconsin.edu/capital-planning/planning/>, the Board of Regents Major Project Request Evaluation Criteria <https://www.wisconsin.edu/capital-planning/capital-budget/request-evaluation/>, and the Postsecondary Education Facilities Inventory and Classification Manual (FICM) 2006 Edition <https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006160.pdf> as applicable and appropriate. This effort will also follow DFD’s Guideline for Developing Program Statements and Feasibility Studies (Rev 2019-02 or later edition), #6a Table of Contents standard. Scope of work components include developing color-coded schematic floor plans, tabular room/space data, and narrative descriptions to depict and detail the following items for each building, wing, floor level, and/or quadrant as applicable. This reference information will be used to assess potential space relocations and/or reallocations. The scope of work will likely be phased to allow review and to determine the specifics and services required for each consecutive component. The outline below is a general reference of the phases and the associated components of each. These phases may be further defined and refined throughout the project.

ID Y/N? Description Comments and Clarification Notes A.00 Planning Considerations A.04 Includes developing recommendations based on room

scheduling and utilization data, program delivery, enrollment projections, and appropriate benchmarks.

A.01 Master Planning A.02 Blocking and Stacking Diagramming A.03 Scope Definition A.04 Space Needs Analysis A.05 Site Evaluation A.06 Market Study A.07 Space Utilization Analysis B.00 Project and Program Considerations B.12 Includes adaptive reuse, functionality assessment, and/or

physical condition assessment. B.01 Occupants/User Activities B.02 Space Tabulation B.03 Room Data Sheets B.04 Site/Survey B.05 Easements B.06 Zoning Approval Efforts B.07 Floodplain Restrictions B.08 Landholdings/Ownership/Boundaries B.09 Utilities/Infrastructure B.10 Energy Modeling B.11 Existing Facilities Survey B.12 Facility Condition Assessment B.13 Document Existing Conditions B.14 Concealed Conditions B.15 Building Code Analysis B.16 Phasing Options and Analysis B.17 Adjacency Analysis and Matrix B.18 Facility Specialties B.23 Includes architectural and performance lighting (artistic,

athletics, theatrical) B.25 Includes selection, recommendation, specification, and/or systems furniture layout.

B.19 Acoustics B.20 Elevator Constructor/Vertical Transportation B.21 Food Service Operations/Kiosks B.22 Security/Video Surveillance B.23 Specialty Lighting B.24 Other (Please Specify) B.25 Furnishings, Fixtures, & Equipment B.26 Select Only (campus to procure and install) B.27 Select & Specify (campus to procure and install) B.28 Select, Specify, & Supervise Installation B.29 Fixed Equipment B.30 Movable Equipment B.31 Art Selection Assistance

https://www.wisconsin.edu/capital-planning/planning/

https://www.wisconsin.edu/capital-planning/capital-budget/request-evaluation/

http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006160.pdf



B.32 Universal Design C.01 Includes additional on-site construction administration beyond basic services B.33 Historic Preservation

B.34 Historic Structure Report (HSR) B.35 Historic Preservation Plan (HPP) B.36 Wisconsin Historical Society Approval for Building Concept B.37 Presentations B.38 Formal Presentation(s) B.39 Presentation Materials B.40 Facilitate on Campus Design Document Review C.00 Construction Administration C.01 Additional Construction Administration Services D.00 Miscellaneous D.02 includes [SELECT OPTION(S) HERE LEED, WELL

Building, Green Globes, AIA COTE Top Ten, etc.] certification, certification submittal, and/or measurement & verification report(s). E.00 Includes Benchmark Facility Tours, Selective and Investigative Demolition, Post-bidding Analysis, and Specialty Bidding Conditions

D.01 Wayfinding D.02 Building Performance and Certification Standards Compliance D.03 Renderings, Models, and Mock-Ups D.04 Building Information Modeling D.05 Measured Drawings Beyond Project Area D.06 Commissioning (i.e. Level 2, Exterior Envelope) D.07 Post Occupancy Evaluation E.00 Other (Please Specify) ID Y/N? Description Comments and Clarification Notes

F.00 Pre-Requisite Considerations F.01 Determine and document what type(s) of space is(are) required and where surge space is available to facilitate any portion of the proposed project solution/phase/alternate. Also determine the suitability of space available as it relates to the temporary relocation needs of the proposed project.

F.01 Surge Space(s) Identification and Suitability Determination F.02 Utility Infrastructure Impact(s) Identification and Strategy

Recommendation

G.00 Capital Plan Considerations G.01 Determine and document what capital project work is

required to enable or facilitate any portion of the proposed project solution/phase/alternate. The scope of work identified in this section should not be included in the proposed project solution/phase/alternate scope or budget estimate.

G.01 Project Sequence Dependency Identification

H.00 Physical Development Impacts H.01 Determine and document what building code compliance

resolutions are required and included in the proposed project solution/phase/alternate scope and budget estimate. H.02 Determine and document what health & safety condition compliance resolutions are required and included in the proposed project solution/phase/alternate scope and budget estimate. H.05 Complete the table shown at left as per each proposed project solution/phase/alternate and provide the additional assessments for each type of project space as outlined below the\\ table.

H.01 Code Compliance Resolution H.02 Health & Safety Condition Resolution H.03 Environmental Protection Condition Resolution H.04 Facility and/or Program Standards Condition Resolution H.05 Space Profile (Demolition/Renovation/New Construction)

Demolition 0 ASF 0 GSF $ 0

Renovation 0 ASF 0 GSF $ 0 New Construction 0 ASF 0 GSF $ 0

Project Total 0 ASF 0 GSF $ 0 Determine and document the following for each solution/phase/alternative… 1. Estimated capital renovation costs and current replacement value for the

proposed space to be (a) demolished or (b) renovated. 2. If any portion of the proposed new construction is required to resolve…

a. …building codes and standards, health and safety conditions, environmental protection conditions, and/or facility or program standards which cannot be economically be resolved in existing space; and/or

b. …demonstrated capacity issues or space shortages related to enrollment growth and 5-year enrollment trends (specific program and/or overall campus); and/or

c. …poor adaptive reuse potential for existing space that could have been included in the proposed project solution scope and budget estimate.



ID Y/N? Description Comments and Clarification Notes I.00 Programmatic Impacts I.03 Determine and document if any portion of the proposed

project solution/phase/alternate resolves a demonstrated space shortage for program space, especially instructional classrooms and laboratories. I.04 Determine and document if any portion of the proposed project solution resolves known and demonstrated poor space utilization as per UWSA space utilization standards, especially instructional classrooms and laboratories.

I.01 Energy Use and Cost Impacts I.02 Space Quality, Performance, and Suitability Determination I.03 Space Quantity, Availability, and Capacity Determination I.04 Space Utilization Profile and Benchmarking

J.00 PART I: CORE INFORMATION J.00 The selected consultant will be provided schematic floor

plans in AutoCAD native DWG file format and a current space inventory workbook and/or database partially populated to be verified, corrected, augmented, modified, and/or completed as necessary.

J.01 Framework and Floor Assessment: structural bay spacing, floor to floor height/clear space, floor loading capacity, roof loading capacity, etc.

J.02 Space Inventory and Allocation: current space inventory and allocations by college or school; department or program; room/space type; assignable square feet; occupancy capacity, student station and furniture type; etc. Room/space allocation coding should be assigned according to the Postsecondary Education Facilities Inventory and Classification Manual (FICM) 2006 Edition, Section 4.3 Space Use Codes. Includes the minimum data inventory fields and requirements by UW System Administration. This template (available upon request) can be expanded if needed for specific space planning needs by each project or institution.

J.03 Instructional Space Inventory and Index: enhanced and expanded tabular data specific to general access classrooms and instructional laboratories. Includes room dimensions, aspect ratio, ceiling height, technology level, deficiency codes, and comments.

K.00 PART II: CONDITION, USE, AND UTILIZATION ASSESSMENT K.00 The selected consultant will be provided with multiple

semesters of instructional utilization data in the prescribed format and file template. The work described above will be performed on the selected buildings and building additions listed below.

K.01 Functionality/Space Use Assessment: current space allocation functionality and suitability assessment, adaptive reuse assessment if/when a space is defined as unsatisfactory or inappropriate for current use, building and/or program standards and compliance assessment, building and/or program deficiencies, etc. Condition ratings should be assigned according to the Postsecondary Education Facilities Inventory and Classification Manual (FICM) 2006 Edition, Section 5.5.5 Space Suitability. Provide condition assessment by building system and for the overall building or complex of connected building additions.

K.02 Physical Condition Assessment: current physical condition assessment, physical deficiency assessment, etc. Condition ratings should be assigned according to the Postsecondary Education Facilities Inventory and Classification Manual (FICM) 2006 Edition, Sections 5.5.4 Building Condition and 5.5.6 Room or Space Condition. Provide condition assessment by building system and for the overall building or complex of connected building additions.

K.03 Space Utilization Assessment: projected future space allocations by college or school, department or program, room/space type, assignable square feet, occupancy capacity, etc. based on demand and utilization data, projected enrollment growth, program and space type standards and compliance. Room/space allocation coding should be assigned according to the Postsecondary Education Facilities Inventory and Classification Manual (FICM)



2006 Edition, Section 4.3 Space Use Codes. This component requires analysis of room/space schedule, enrollment/occupancy, and capacity information available from the Registrar for instructional spaces, event management systems, and departmentally controlled spaces. A minimum of the most recent fall and spring semester (excluding Fall 2020 and Spring 2021 due to COVID-19 remote learning protocols) of instructional space utilization and schedule data available should be analyzed. All instructional space utilization data should be provided at a minimum in the UW System Administration template for Instructional Space Utilization Reporting, which is available upon request.

Capital Project Request 2023-25 Biennium

9/20/2021 PLT_Ottensman_Pre-Design page 1 of 3

Agency Institution Facility ID Facility Name University of Wisconsin Platteville 285-0H-0010 Ottensman Hall

Project ID Project Title Priority 21I1Q Ottensman Hall Renovation Pre-Design Study

Project Type

AFTER SELECTING THE APPROPRIATE PROJECT TYPE HERE, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETE ALL CORRESPONDING & COLORCODED SECTIONS THROUGHOUT THE REQUEST FORM.

All Agency Instructional Minor Major UW Managed Double-click on a checkbox to open the Check Box Form Field Options dialog box to change the state of the checkbox.

Project Intent

This project will hire an architect/engineer consultant to complete an Ottensman Hall Renovation Pre-Design Study. The study will be used to inform the proposed future Ottensman Hall Renovation project, which is anticipated to completely reprogram and renovate Ottensman Hall.

Project Description and Scope

The Ottensman Hall Renovation Pre-Design Study will complete the following: - Space needs assessment and space fit analysis, - Ottensman Hall renovation feasibility assessment, with particular focus on existing condition of the building envelope,

and renovation scoping, - Construction phasing options, and - Construction cost estimates.

Ottensman Hall (100,976 ASF/ 168,829 GSF, Const. 1966), which has served as the campus’s primary engineering building, will be largely vacant beginning in Fall 2022, as the campus moves engineering programs from Ottensman Hall into new Sesquicentennial Hall. It is anticipated that the Chemistry Dept. will remain in Ottensman Hall (2nd and 3rd Floors), as will two high-bay Civil Engineering lab spaces (ground floor). The intent of the proposed future Ottensman Hall Renovation project is to repurpose Ottensman Hall from a 1960’s era engineering building to a modern and effective academic and student services building. Immediately following Ottensman renovation, the functions currently housed in four relic 1950’s and 1960’s era buildings; Brigham, Gardner, Royce, and Warner Halls (totaling 165,615 GSF, Const. 1950-62) will be permanently relocated to the reprogrammed and renovated Ottensman Hall. The Ottensman Hall Renovation project will then raze the vacant Brigham, Gardner, Royce and Warner Halls. Pioneer Tower academic building space (22,345 ASF/ 50,338 GSF, Const. 1969) shall also be included as a candidate for relocating to the future Ottensman Hall. The proposed future Ottensman Hall Renovation project is informed by the following studies:

• #10F1F Comprehensive Campus Master Plan, 2011 o Facility Evaluation for Evaluation and Reuse Ottensman, Vol. 1, Pgs. 6.2 - 6.11

• #11E2F Data Center Feasibility Study, 2012 o Planning Goals, Assumptions, Issues and Opportunities, Pgs. 16-17

• #12L1K Academic Building Feasibility Study, 2015 o Ottensman Hall Analysis of Existing Conditions, Pgs. 122 - 138

• #12L1K Academic Building Feasibility Study – Plan B Chemistry Laboratories Renov. Feas. Study, 2016.

Analysis of Need and Project Justification

Ottensman Hall is a functionally failing, programmatically relic building that will be approx. 70% vacant starting Fall 2022. Through a strategic combination of building renovation and demolition, the proposed Ottensman Hall Renovation project completely resolves all issues with five of the campus’s worst-condition buildings: Ottensman Hall (Functional Grade “F”, Physical Grade “Poor”) and Brigham, Gardner, Royce and Warner Halls (all Functional Grade “F”, Physical Grade “Terminate”). without adding new GSF, and with a net reduction of 165,615 GSF. The Ottensman Hall



Renovation Planning Study (this project) will also consider Pioneer Tower (Functional Grade “D”, Physical Grade “Satisfactory”, and Space Efficiency Factor of 44%) space for relocation to the future reprogrammed and renovated Ottensman Hall. The table below illustrates the poor functional and physical condition of Ottensman, Brigham, Gardner, Royce and Warner Halls and the volume of space impacted by this project.

Overall Building Condition Rating and Space Planning Summary #10F1F Comprehensive Campus Master Plan, Vol. 1, Pg. 1.19

Building Const. Condition* Existing Proposed Renov. Proposed Demo. Func

tion Physical ASF GSF ASF GSF ASF GSF

Ottensman 1965 F Poor 100,967 168,129 100,967 168,129

Brigham 1950 F Termination 14,015 25,442 14,015 25,442 Brigham Addition

1956 F Termination 4,979 8,461 4,979 8,461

Gardner Hall 1961 F Termination 28,663 46,621 28,663 46,621 Royce Hall 1957 F Termination 23,086 37,402 23,086 37,402 Warner Hall 1962 F Termination 29,410 47,689 29,410 47,689

Sum 201,120 334,444 100,967 168,129 100,153 165,615

The table below, developed in Nov. 2019, illustrates deferred maintenance eliminated as a % of total Ottensman Renovation project cost.

Deferred Maintenance as a % of Total Project Cost (developed Nov. 2019) Building GSF

Renovation Total Project Cost in 2024

Deferred Maintenance in 2014

ENR Index Inflation Factor from 1/2014 to 3/2024 (from 2019 PBW Template)

Deferred Maintenance In 2024

Deferred Maintenance as a % of Total Project Cost.

Ottensman 168,829 $97,529,000 $15,179,770 1.53 $23,225,048 Brigham, Gardner, Royce, Warner

$22,355,800 1.53 $34,204,374

SUM $57,429,422 58.9%

Consultant Requirements UW Managed Projects ≍ All Agency Projects

Consultants should submit their qualifications and demonstrate specific expertise and experience in the design and coordination of Pre-Design Studies including facility programming and space consulting, building renovation feasibility assessment with particular focus on building envelope analysis, renovation scoping, space needs assessment and space fit analysis, renovation construction phasing options, and construction cost estimates as part of a design team. Work includes project area surveys, acquiring field data, and verifying as-built conditions to assure accurate development of the Pre-Design Study.



Project Budget Funding Sources

Construction: $ GFSB: $ 0 Hazardous Materials: $ PRSB: $ 0 Total Construction: $ Cash: $ 0 Design Fees (Basic): $ Gifts: $ 0 Design Fees (Other): $ Grants: $ 0 Total Design Fees: $ BTF: $ 0

Contingency: $ Other (AGF1-Agency/Institution Funds): $ 175,000

Management Fees: $ Other (Please Describe): $ 0 Furnishings/Fixtures/Eqpt: $ Other (Please Describe): $ 0

Total Budget Estimate: $ 175,000 Total Funding Sources: $ 175,000

Project Schedule Project Contact (Institution)

A/E Selection: Oct 2021 Contact Name: Katrina Hecimovic Design Report: N.A. Contact Email: <[email protected]>

Approval: N.A. Contact Phone: 608.342-1155 Bid Opening: N.A. Start Project: Oct 2021

Substantial Completion: Feb 2022 Project Close Out: Mar 2022

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-PLATTEVILLE REQUEST FOR …

Documents

Transcript of UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-PLATTEVILLE REQUEST FOR …