University of Groningen

Modal existential wh-constructionsŠimík, Radek

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite fromit. Please check the document version below.

Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date:2011

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):Šimík, R. (2011). Modal existential wh-constructions Utrecht: s.n.

CopyrightOther than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of theauthor(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediatelyand investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons thenumber of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

Download date: 07-07-2018

Bibliography

Abels, Klaus. 2003. Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding.Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.

Abney, Stephen. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Doc-toral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

Agouraki, Yoryia. 2003. Future wh-clauses in DP-positions.In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung (SuB) 7 , ed.Matthias Weisgerber, 9–24. University of Konstanz. URLhttp://ling.uni-konstanz.de/pages/conferences/sub7/.

Agouraki, Yoryia. 2005. Wh-clauses in DP-positions. In Advances in Greek gen-erative syntax , ed. Melita Stavrou and Arhonto Terzi, 285–330. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.

Ambrazas, Vytautas, ed. 1997. Lithuanian grammar . Vilnius: Baltos Lankos.

Apresjan, Jurij D., and Leonid L. Iomdin. 1989. Konstrukcija tipa negde spat’ :Sintaksis, semantika, leksikografija. Semiotika i informatika 29:34–92.

Arsenijevic, Boban. to appear. Evaluative reflexions: Evaluative dative reflexivein South East Serbo-Croatian. In Datives in variation: A micro-comparativeperspective, ed. Ricardo Etxepare and Beatriz Fernandez. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.

Avgustinova, Tania. 2003. Russian infinitival existential constructions from anHPSG perspective. In Investigations into formal Slavic linguistics: Contri-butions of the Fourth European Conference on Formal Description of SlavicLanguages (FDSL IV), Part II , ed. Peter Kosta, Joanna B laszczak, JensFrasek, Ljudmila Geist, and Marzena Zygis, 461–482. Frankfurt am Main:Peter Lang Verlag.

310 Bibliography

Babby, Leonard H. 1998. Subject control as direct predication: Evidence fromRussian. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 6: The ConnecticutMeeting 1997 , ed. Zeljko Boskovic, Steven Franks, and William Snyder, 17–37. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.

Babby, Leonard H. 2000. Infinitival existential sentences in Russian: A caseof syntactic suppletion. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 8: ThePhiladelphia Meeting 1999 , ed. Tracy Holloway King and Irina A. Sekerina,1–21. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.

Bach, Emmon. 1982. Purpose clauses and control. In The nature of syntacticrepresentation, ed. Pauline Jacobson and Geoffrey Pullum, 35–57. Dordrecht:Reidel.

Bach, Emmon. 1986. The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 9:5–16.

Bailyn, John Frederick. 2004. Generalized inversion. Natural Language & Lin-guistic Theory 22:1–49.

Baker, Carl L. 1968. Indirect questions in English. Doctoral Dissertation,University of Illinois, Urbana.

Baker, Carl L. 1970. Notes on the description of English questions. Foundationsof Language 6:197–219.

Baker, Carl L. 1989. English syntax . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Barwise, Jon, and Robin Cooper. 1981. Generalized quantifiers and naturallanguage. Linguistics and Philosophy 4:159–219.

Bayer, Josef, and Ellen Brandner. 2004. Klitisiertes zu im Bairischen und Ale-mannischen. In Morphologie und Syntax deutscher Dialekte und historischeDialektologie des Deutschen, ed. Franz Patocka and Peter Wiesinger, 160–188. Wien: Praesens.

Beck, Sigrid. 2006. Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. NaturalLanguage Semantics 14:1–56.

Beck, Sigrid, and Kyle Johnson. 2004. Double objects again. Linguistic Inquiry35:97–124.

ter Beek, Janneke. 2008. Restructuring and infinitival complements in Dutch.Doctoral Dissertation, University of Groningen [Published in LOT disserta-tion series].

Bello, Andres. 1847. Gramatica de la lengua castellana (with notes by RufinoJ. Cuervo; 1970 edition). Buenos Aires: Editorial Sopena Argentina.

Berman, Stephen. 1991. On the semantics and logical form of wh-clauses.Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Bibliography 311

Besters-Dilger, Juliane. 1988. Zur Negation im Russischen und Polnischen.Munchen: Sagner.

Bhatt, Rajesh. 1999. Covert modality in non-finite contexts. Doctoral Disser-tation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Bhatt, Rajesh. 2006. Covert modality in non-finite contexts . The Hague: Mou-ton de Gruyter.

Bianchi, Valentina. 1999. Consequences of antisymmetry: Headed relativeclauses . New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Bickel, Balthasar, Bernard Comrie, and Martin Haspelmath. 2008. The Leipzigglossing rules: Conventions for interlinear morpheme-by-morpheme glosses.University of Leipzig and Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropol-ogy, Leipzig.

Boeckx, Cedric, and Sandra Stjepanovic. 2001. Head-ing toward PF. LinguisticInquiry 32:345–355.

Boeckx, Cedric, and Sandra Stjepanovic. 2005. The wh/clitic connection. InClitics and affixation, ed. Lorie Heggie and Francisco Ordonez, 301–314.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Bok-Bennema, Reineke. 1991. Case and agreement in Inuit . Berlin: Foris.

Bosque, Ignacio, and Juan-Carlos Moreno. 1984. A condition on quantifiers inlogical form. Linguistic Inquiry 15:164–167.

Boskovic, Zeljko. 1998. Wh-phrases and wh-movement in Slavic. Position paperfor the Comparative Slavic Morphosyntax Conference, Bloomington, IN.

Boskovic, Zeljko. 2000. Second position cliticization: Syntax and/or phonology?In Clitic phenomena in European languages , ed. Frits Beukema and Marcelden Dikken, 71–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Boskovic, Zeljko. 2001. On the nature of the syntax-phonology interface: Cliti-cization and related phenomena. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Boskovic, Zeljko. 2008. On two types of negative constituents and negativeconcord. In Studies in formal Slavic linguistics: Contributions from FormalDescription of Slavic Languages (FDSL) 6.5 , ed. Franc Marusic and RokZaucer, 9–35. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Browne, Wayles. 1986. Relative clauses in Serbo-Croatian in comparison withEnglish. University of Zagreb.

Buring, Daniel. 2003. On D-trees, beans, and B-accents. Linguistics and Phi-losophy 26:511–545.

312 Bibliography

Burton, Strang. 1995. Six issues to consider in choosing a husband: Possessiverelations in the lexical semantic structures of verbs. Doctoral Dissertation,Rutgers University, New York.

Buzarovska, Eleni, and Olga Miseska Tomic. 2008. Subjunctive relatives inBulgarian and Macedonian. Manuscript, University of Skopje and Universityof Leiden.

Cable, Seth. 2007. The grammar of Q: Q-particles and the nature of wh-fronting, as revealed by the wh-questions of Tlingit. Doctoral Dissertation,MIT, Cambridge, MA.

Cable, Seth. 2008. Wh-fronting in Hungarian is not focus-fronting. Manuscript,University of Massachusetts, Amherst & University of British Columbia.

Caha, Pavel. 2009. The nanosyntax of case. Doctoral Dissertation, Universityof Tromsø.

Calabrese, Andrea. 1984. Mutliple questions and focus in Italian. In Sententialcomplementation, ed. Wim de Geest and Yvan Putseys, 67–74. Dordrecht:Foris.

Caponigro, Ivano. 2001. On the semantics of indefinite free relatives. In Pro-ceedings of ConSOLE 10 , ed. Marjo van Koppen, Joanna Sio, and Markde Vos, 49–62. Leiden: SOLE.

Caponigro, Ivano. 2003. Free not to ask: On the semantics of free relatives andwh-words cross-linguistically. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California,Los Angeles.

Caponigro, Ivano. 2004. The semantic contribution of wh-words and type shifts:Evidence from free relatives crosslinguistically. In SALT 14: Proceedings fromthe 14th Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, ed. Robert B.Young, 38–55. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

Cardinaletti, Anna, and Ur Shlonsky. 2004. Clitic positions and restructuringin Italian. Linguistic Inquiry 35:519–557.

Carlson, Greg N. 1977. Amount relatives. Language 53:520–542.

Ceplova, Marketa. 2007. Infinitives under ‘have’/‘be’ in Czech. In Czech ingenerative grammar , ed. Mojmır Docekal, Petr Karlık, and Jana Zmrzlıkova,31–45. Munchen: LINCOM.

Chierchia, Gennaro. 1984. Topics in the syntax and semantics of infinitives andgerunds. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Chierchia, Gennaro. 1988. Topics in the syntax and semantics of infinitivesand gerunds . New York: Garland.

Bibliography 313

Chierchia, Gennaro. 1989a. Anaphora and attitudes de se. In Semantics andcontextual expression, ed. Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem, and Petervan Emde Boas, 1–32. Dordrecht: Foris.

Chierchia, Gennaro. 1989b. Structured meanings, thematic roles, and con-trol. In Properties, types and meaning, Volume II: Semantic issues , ed. Gen-naro Chierchia, Barbara Partee, and Raymond Turner, 131–166. Dordrecht:Kluwer.

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use.New York: Praeger.

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step,ed. R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MITPress.

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken hale: A life in language,ed. Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry36:1–22.

Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Foundational issues in linguistic theory:Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud , ed. Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero,and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik. 1977. Filters and control. LinguisticInquiry 8:425–504.

Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik. 1993. The theory of principles and pa-rameters. In Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research,ed. Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld, and TheoVennemann, 506–569. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Chung, Sandra, and James McCloskey. 1983. On the interpretation of certainisland facts in GPSG. Linguistic Inquiry 14:704–713.

Chvany, Catherine V. 1975. On the syntax of BE-sentences in Russian. Cam-bridge, MA: Slavica Publishers.

Cichocki, Wladyslaw. 1983. Multiple wh-questions in Polish: A two-Comp anal-ysis. In Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 4 , 53–71.

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2006. Restructuring and functional heads: The cartographyof syntactic structures, vol 4 . New York: Oxford University Press.

314 Bibliography

Citko, Barbara. 1998. On multiple wh-movement in Slavic. In FormalApproaches to Slavic Linguistics 6: The Connecticut Meeting 1997 , ed.Zeljko Boskovic, Steven Franks, and William Snyder, 97–114. Ann Arbor,MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.

Comorovski, Ileana. 1986. Multiple wh-movement in Romanian. LinguisticInquiry 17:171–177.

van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen, and Aniko Liptak. 2006. The crosslinguistic syntaxof sluicing: Evidence from Hungarian relatives. Syntax 9:248–274.

van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen, and Aniko Liptak. 2008. On the interaction be-tween verb movement and ellipsis: New evidence from Hungarian. In WCCFL26: Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics ,ed. Charles B. Chang and Hannah J. Haynie, 138–146. Somerville, MA: Cas-cadilla Proceedings Project. URL www.lingref.com,document#1665.

van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen, and Aniko Liptak. 2009. What sluicing can do,what it can’t and in which language: On the cross-linguistic syntax of ellipsis.Manuscript, Catholic University Brussels and University of Leiden.

Dayal, Veneeta. 1996. Locality in wh-quantification: Questions and relativeclauses in Hindi . Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Dekker, Paul. 1993. Existential disclosure. Linguistics and Philosophy 16:561–587.

Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Dixon, Robert M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.

Dotlacil, Jakub. 2004. The syntax of infinitives in Czech. Master’s thesis,University of Tromsø.

Dotlacil, Jakub. 2007. Why clitics cannot climb out of CPs: A discourse ap-proach. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 15: The Toronto Meet-ing 2006 , ed. Richard Compton, Magdalena Goledzinowska, and UlyanaSavchenko, 76–93. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.

Dowty, David. 1972. Studies in the logic of verb aspect and time reference inEnglish. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar . Dordrecht: Rei-del.

Dowty, David. 1985. On recent analyses of the semantics of control. Linguisticsand Philosophy 8:291–331.

Bibliography 315

E. Kiss, Katalin. 2003. Argument scrambling, operator movement, and topicmovement in Hungarian. In Word order and scrambling, ed. Simin Karimi,22–43. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Evers, Arnold. 1975. The transformational cycle in Dutch and German. Bloom-ington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

Faraci, Robert A. 1974. Aspects of the grammar of infinitives and for-phrases.Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

Fleischer, Nicholas. 2006. Russian dative subjects, case, and control.Manuscript, UC Berkeley.

Franks, Steven, and Tracy Holloway King. 2000. A handbook of Slavic clitics .New York: Oxford University Press.

Freeze, Ray. 1992. Existentials and other locatives. Language 68:553–595.

Frege, Gottlob. 1923–26. Logische Untersuchungen. Dritter Teil:Gedankengefuge. Beitrage zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus3:36–51.

Frey, Werner. 2005. Pragmatic properties of certain German and English leftperipheral constructions. Linguistics 43:89–129.

Galkina-Fedoruk, Evdokia Mikhailovna. 1958. Bezlicnye predlozenija v sovre-mennom russkom jazyke. Moscow: Izdateljstvo Moskovskogo universiteta.

Gamut, L. T. F. 1991. Logic, language, and meaning. Vol I: Introduction tologic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Garde, Paul. 1976. Analyse de la tournure russe mne necego delat’. Interna-tional Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 22:43–60.

Gartner, Hans-Martin. 2009. More on the indefinite-interrogative affinity: Theview from embedded non-finite interrogatives. Linguistic Typology 13:1–37.

van Geenhoven, Veerle, and Louise McNally. 2005. On the property analysis ofopaque elements. Lingua 115:885–914.

Georgieva, V. L. 1971. O prirode i istorii otricatel’nyx konstrukcij tipa Nechegodelat’, Nekud idti (v sootnoshenii s utverditel’nymi). Uchenye zapiskiLeningradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo instituta 45:212–227.

Grimshaw, Jane. 1977. English wh-constructions and the theory of grammar.Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Grimshaw, Jane. 1979. Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic In-quiry 10:279–326.

316 Bibliography

Groenendijk, Jeroen, and Martin Stokhof. 1984. Studies on the semantics ofquestions and the pragmatics of answers. Doctoral Dissertation, Universityof Amsterdam.

Groos, Anneke, and Henk van Riemsdijk. 1981. Matching effects in free rela-tives: A parameter of core grammar. In Theory of markedness in generativegrammar: Proceedings of the 1979 GLOW conference, ed. Adriana Belletti,Luciana Brandi, and Luigi Rizzi, 171–216. Scuola Normale Superiore.

Grosu, Alexander. 1987. Pied-piping and the matching parameter. The Lin-guistic Review 6:41–58.

Grosu, Alexander. 1994. Three studies in locality and case. London: Routledge.

Grosu, Alexander. 2002. Strange relatives at the interface of two millennia.Glot International 6:145–167.

Grosu, Alexander. 2004. The syntax-semantics of modal existential wh con-structions. In Balkan syntax and semantics , ed. Olga Miseska Tomic, 405–438. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Grosu, Alexander, and Fred Landman. 1998. Strange relatives of the thirdkind. Natural Language Semantics 6:125–170.

Hackl, Martin, and Jon Nissenbaum. 2003. A modal ambiguity in for-infinitivalrelative clauses. Manuscript, Pomona College and McGill University.

Hamblin, Charles L. 1973. Questions in Montague English. Foundations ofLanguage 10:41–53.

Harley, Heidi. 2002. Possession and the double object construction. LinguisticVariation Yearbook 2:31–70.

Harley, Heidi. 2004. Wanting, having, and getting: A note on Fodor and Lepore1998. Linguistic Inquiry 35:255–267.

Hartman, Jeremy. to appear. Intervention in tough constructions. In NELS 39:Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society.Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.

Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Doc-toral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Heim, Irene. 1991. Artikel und Definitheit. In Semantik: Ein internationalesHandbuch der zeitgenossischen Forschung, ed. Arnim von Stechow and Di-eter Wunderlich, 487–535. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar .Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Bibliography 317

Heine, Bernd. 1997. Possession: Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticaliza-tion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Herburger, Elena. 2000. What counts: Focus and quantification. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.

Hicks, Glyn. 2003. “So easy to look at, so hard to define”: Tough movement inthe minimalist framework. Master’s thesis, University of York.

Hinterwimmer, Stefan. 2008. Q-adverbs as selective binders: The quantifi-cational variability of free relatives and definite DPs . Berlin: Mouton deGruyter.

Hirschbuhler, Paul. 1976. Two analyses of free relatives in French. In NELS 6:Proceedings of the 6th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society,137–152. Montreal.

Hirschbuhler, Paul. 1978. The syntax and semantics of wh-constructions. Doc-toral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Hirschbuhler, Paul, and Marıa-Luisa Rivero. 1981. A unified analysis of match-ing and non-matching free relatives in Catalan. In NELS 11: Proceedings ofthe 11th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, ed. Victoria A.Burke and James Pustejovsky, 113–124. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.

Holthusen, Johannes. 1953. Russisch nechego und Verwandtes. Zeitschrift furslavische Philologie 22:156–159.

Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30:69–96.

Horvath, Julia. 2007. Separating focus movement from focus. In Phrasaland clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation, ed. SiminKarimi, Vida Samiian, and Wendy K. Wilkins, 108–145. Amsterdam: JohnBenjamins.

Huang, C. T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory ofgrammars. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

Isacenko, Alexander V. 1976. O sintaksiceskoj prirode mestoimenij. In Operaselecta, 354–361. Munchen: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.

Izvorski, Roumyana. 1998. Non-indicative wh-complements of possessive andexistential predicates. In NELS 28: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meet-ing of the North East Linguistic Society, ed. Pius N. Tamanji and KiyomiKusumoto, 159–173.

Jacobson, Pauline. 1995. On the quantificational force of English free relatives.In Quantification in natural languages, Vol II , ed. Emmon Bach, Eloise Je-linek, Angelika Kratzer, and Barbara Partee, 451–486. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

318 Bibliography

Johnson, Kyle. to appear. Towards deriving differences in how wh-movementand QR are pronounced. Lingua .

Jones, Charles. 1991. Purpose clauses: Syntax, thematics, and semantics ofEnglish purpose constructions . Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Jung, Hakyung. 2008. The grammar of have in a have-less language: Possession,perfect, and ergativity in North Russian. Doctoral Dissertation, HarvardUniversity, Cambridge, MA.

Junghanns, Uwe. 2000. Infinitheit und Clitic Climbing. Presented at the 22ndMeeting of DGfS, Marburg.

Junghanns, Uwe. 2002. Untersuchungen zur Syntax und Informationsstrukturslavischer Deklarativsatze. Linguistische Arbeitsberichte 80.

Kaledaite, Violeta. 2000. Savita lietuviskoji BKB konstrukcija [The BKB con-struction in Lithuanian as a language-specific existential structure]. Darbaiir Dienos 24:75–81.

Kaledaite, Violeta. 2002. Existential sentences in English and Lithuanian.Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Kaledaite, Violeta. 2008. Language-specific existential sentence types: A casestudy of Lithuanian. Linguistics: Germanic and Romance Studies 59:128–137.

Karttunen, Lauri. 1977. The syntax and semantics of questions. Linguisticsand Philosophy 1:3–44.

Kayne, Richard S. 1989. Null subjects and clitic climbing. In The null subjectparameter , ed. Osvaldo Jaeggli and Ken Safir, 239–261. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Kayne, Richard S. 1993. Towards a modular theory of auxiliary selection.Studia Linguistica 47:3–31.

Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax . Cambridge, MA: MITPress.

Kondrashova, Natalia. 1996. The syntax of existential quantification. DoctoralDissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Kondrashova, Natalia. 2008. Negated wh-items in Russian: Syntactic and se-mantic puzzles. Presented at the Third Meeting of the Slavic LinguisticSociety (SLS), Ohio State University.

Kondrashova, Natalia, and Radek Simık. to appear. Quantificational proper-ties of neg-wh items in Russian. In NELS 40: Proceedings of the 40th AnnualMeeting of the North East Linguistic Society. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publi-cations.

Bibliography 319

Koopman, Hilda, and Anna Szabolcsi. 2000. Verbal complexes . Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.

Koster, Jan. 1984. On binding and control. Linguistic Inquiry 15:417–459.

Koster, Jan. 1987. Domains and dynasties: The radical autonomy of syntax .Dordrecht: Foris.

Kratzer, Angelika. 1977. What must and can must and can means. Linguisticsand Philosophy 1:337–355.

Kratzer, Angelika. 1981. On the notional category of modality. In Words,worlds, and context , ed. Hans Eikmeyer and Hendrik Rieser, 38–74. Berlin:de Gruyter.

Kratzer, Angelika. 1986. Conditionals. In CLS 22, Part 2: Papers from theParasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory, ed. A. Farley, P. Farley,and K.-E. McCullough, 1–15. University of Chicago.

Kratzer, Angelika. 1991. Modality. In Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuchder zeitgenossischen Forschung, ed. Arnim von Stechow and Dieter Wunder-lich, 639–650. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Kratzer, Angelika. 2008. Situations in natural language semantics. InThe stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. URLhttp://plato.stanford.edu/.

Kratzer, Angelika, and Junko Shimoyama. 2002. Indeterminate pronouns: Theview from Japanese. In The proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference onPsycholinguistics , ed. Yukio Otsu, 1–25. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.

Krifka, Manfred. 2001. For a structured meaning account of questions andanswers. In Audiatur vox sapientia: A festschrift for Arnim von Stechow , ed.Caroline Fery and Wolfgang Sternefeld, 287–319. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

Kucerova, Ivona. 2007. The syntax of givenness. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT,Cambridge, MA.

Kucerova, Ivona. 2008. Givenness and maximize presupposition. In Proceedingsof Sinn und Bedeutung 12 , ed. Atle Grønn, 353–366. Oslo: ILOS.

Landau, Idan. 2000. Elements of control: Structure and meaning in infinitivalconstructions . Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Landau, Idan. 2004. The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control. NaturalLanguage & Linguistic Theory 22:811–877.

Larson, Richard. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry19:335–391.

320 Bibliography

Larson, Richard. 2010. On Pylkkanen’s semantics for low applicatives. Lin-guistic Inquiry 41:701–704.

Larson, Richard, Marcel den Dikken, and Peter Ludlow. 1997. Inten-sional transitive verbs and abstract clausal complementation. URLhttp://semlab5.sbs.sunysb.edu/~rlarson/larson-papers.html,manuscript.

Lasnik, Howard. 1999. On feature strength: Three minimalist approaches toovert movement. Linguistic Inquiry 30:197–217.

Lavine, James, and Robert Freidin. 2002. The subject of defective T(ense) inSlavic. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 10:251–287.

Lenertova, Denisa. 2004. Czech pronominal clitics. Journal of Slavic Linguistics12:135–171.

Link, Godehard. 1983. The logical analysis of plural and mass terms: A lat-tice theoretical approach. In Meaning, use, and interpretation of language,ed. Rainer Bauerle, Christoph Schwarze, and Arnim von Stechow, 302–323.Berlin: de Gruyter.

Liptak, Aniko. 2000. Multiple relatives as relatives of questions. In Approachesto Hungarian 7: Papers from the Pecs Conference, ed. Gabor Alberti andIstvan Kenesei, 151–177. Szeged: JATEPress.

Liptak, Aniko. 2001. On the syntax of wh-items in Hungarian. Doctoral Dis-sertation, University of Leiden.

Liptak, Aniko. 2003. Hungarian modal existential wh-constructions.Manuscript, University of Leiden.

Liptak, Aniko. 2004. On the correlative nature of Hungarian left-peripheralrelatives. In ZAS Papers in Linguistics: Proceedings of the dislocated elementsworkshop, ed. Benjamin Shaer, Werner Frey, and Claudia Maienborn, 287–313. Berlin: ZAS.

Livitz, Inna. 2010. Distinguishing existentials: Modal possessive constructionsin Russian. Presented at the Formal Approaches of Slavic Linguistics 19,University of Maryland.

Lobeck, Anne. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Manzini, M. Rita. 2000. Sentential complementation: The subjunctive. InLexical specification and insertion, ed. Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert,and Jane Grimshaw, 241–268. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

May, Robert. 1977. The grammar of quantification. Doctoral Dissertation,MIT, Cambridge, MA.

Bibliography 321

McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1982. Adverbs and logical form. Language 58:144–184.

McNally, Louise. 1998. Existential sentences without existential quantification.Linguistics & Philosophy 21:353–392.

McNally, Louise. to appear. Existential sentences. In Semantics: An interna-tional handbook of natural language meaning, ed. Claudia Maienborn, Klausvon Heusinger, and Paul Portner. Walter de Gruyter.

Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theoryof ellipsis . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Meyer, Roland. 2003. On multiple wh-fronting and wh-clustering in Czech.In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 11: The Amherst Meeting 2002 ,ed. Wayles Browne, Ji-Yung Kim, Barbara Partee, and Robert Rothstein,393–412. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.

Migdalski, Krzysztof. 2006. The syntax of compound tenses in Slavic. DoctoralDissertation, Tilburg University [Published in LOT dissertation series].

Milsark, Gary. 1974. Existential sentences in English. Doctoral Dissertation,MIT, Cambridge, MA.

Mirowicz, Anatol. 1964. Rosyjskie konstrukcje nieosobowe z zaimkami typunekogo/nechego i odpowiadajace im konstrukcje polskie. Prace filologiczne18:363–372.

Moia, Telmo. 1992. A sintaxe das oracoes relativas sem antecedente expressodo portugues. Master’s thesis, University of Lisbon.

Moltmann, Friederike. 1997. Intensional verbs and quantifiers. Natural Lan-guage Semantics 5:1–52.

Montague, Richard. 1970. English as a formal language. In Linguaggi nellasocieta e nella tecnica, ed. Bruno Visentini, 189–223. Milan: Edizioni di Co-munita.

Montague, Richard. 1973. The proper treatment of quantification in ordinaryEnglish. In Approaches to natural language, ed. Jaakko Hintikka, JuliusMoravcsik, and Patrick Suppes, 221–242. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Mrazek, Roman. 1972. Slavjanskij sintaksiceskij tip mne necego delat’. InSbornık prace Filosoficke fakulty Brnenske university (Rada jazykovedna A-20), 97–105. Brno.

Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1990. Quantification in the theory of grammar . Kluwer:Dordrecht.

Nozsicska, Alfred. 1987. Necego delat’: Ein grammatisches dilemma? WienerSlavistisches Jahrbuch 33:83–96.

322 Bibliography

Obenauer, Hans-Georg. 1977. Syntaxe et interpretation: que interrogatif. LeFrancais Moderne 45:305–341.

Palmaitis, Letas. 1984. Indo-European masdar as the 3rd person and yra inBaltic. Baltistica 20:126–135.

Pancheva, Roumyana. 2010. More students attended FASL than ConSOLE.In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 18: The Cornell Meeting 2009 .Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.

Pancheva-Izvorski, Roumyana. 2000. Free relatives and related matters. Doc-toral Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the semantics of English. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.

Partee, Barbara. 1975. Montague grammar and transformational grammar.Linguistic Inquiry 6:203–300.

Partee, Barbara. 1987. Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting princi-ples. In Studies in discourse representation and the theory of generalizedquantifiers, GRASS 8 , ed. Jeroen Groenendijk, Dick de Jongh, and MartinStokhof, 115–143. Dordrecht: Foris.

Partee, Barbara. 1997. Uniformity vs. versatility: The genitive, a case study[appendix to theo janssen (1997) compositionality]. In The handbook of logicand language, ed. Johan van Benthem and Alice ter Meulen, 464–470. Ams-terdam: Elsevier.

Partee, Barbara, and Mats Rooth. 1983. Generalized conjunction and typeambiguity. In Meaning, use, and interpretation of language, ed. R. Bauerle,C. Schwarze, and Arnim von Stechow, 361–383. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Penchev, Jordan. 1981. Nebensatze des Typs Interrogativpronomen - DA -Verb im Bulgarischen. Zeitschrift fur Slavistik 26.5:667–669.

Peres, Joao, and Telmo Moia. 1995. Areas crıticas de lıngua Portuguesa. Lis-boa: Caminho.

Pesetsky, David. 1982. Paths and categories. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT,Cambridge, MA.

Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In Therepresentation of (in)definiteness , ed. Eric Reuland and Alice ter Meulen,98–129. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Peskovskij, Aleksander M. 1934. Russkij sintaksis v naucnom osvescenii .Moscow: Ucpedgiz.

Bibliography 323

Pietroski, Paul. 2005. Events and semantic architecture. New York: OxfordUniversity Press.

Plann, Susan Joan. 1975. Relative clauses in Spanish. Doctoral Dissertation,UCLA.

Plann, Susan Joan. 1980. Relative clauses in Spanish without overt antecedentsand related constructions . Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

Postal, Paul M. 1974. On raising: One rule of English grammar and its theo-retical implications . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Progovac, Ljiljana. 1993. Locality and subjunctive-like complements in Serbo-Croatian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 1:116–144.

Progovac, Ljiljana. 2005a. Negative and positive feature checking and the dis-tribution of polarity items. In Negation in Slavic, ed. Sue Brown and AdamPrzepiorkowski, 179–217. Bloomington, IN: Slavica Publishers.

Progovac, Ljiljana. 2005b. A syntax of Serbian: Clausal architecture. Bloom-ington, IN: Slavica Publishers.

Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Pylkkanen, Liina. 2002. Introducing arguments. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT,Cambridge, MA.

Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon: a first phase syntax .Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ramos-Santacruz, Milagrosa. 1994. Silent heads of Spanish nonspecific freerelatives. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 23 . Cambridge, MA: MITPress.

Ramsey, Marathon. 1894. A textbook of modern Spanish.

Ramsey, Marathon. 1956. A textbook of modern Spanish, revised by RobertSpaulding. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Raposo, Eduardo Paiva. 1987. Case theory and Infl-to-Comp: The inflectedinfinitive in European Portuguese. Linguistic Inquiry 18:85–109.

Rappaport, Gilbert C. 1986. On a persistent problem of Russian syntax: Sen-tences of the type mne negde spat’. Russian Linguistics 10:1–31.

Rezac, Milan. 2004. Elements of cyclic syntax: Agree and merge. DoctoralDissertation, University of Toronto.

Rezac, Milan. 2005. The syntax of clitic climbing in Czech. In Clitic and affixcombinations , ed. Lorie Heggie and Francisco Ordonez, 103–140. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.

324 Bibliography

van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1978. A note on infinitival free relatives. Manuscript,University of Amsterdam.

van Riemsdijk, Henk. 2007. Free relatives. In The Blackwell syntax companion(SYNCOM), ed. Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 338–382. Oxford:Blackwell.

Rivero, Marıa Luisa, and Milena Milojevic Sheppard. 2003. Indefinite reflexiveclitics in Slavic: Polish and Slovenian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory21:89–155.

Rizzi, Luigi. 1978. A restructuring rule in Italian syntax. In Recent trans-formational studies in European languages , ed. Samuel J. Keyser, 113–158.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian syntax . Dordrecht: Foris.

Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements ofgrammar: A handbook of generative syntax , ed. Liliane Haegeman, 281–337.Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Roberts, Ian. 1997. Restructuring, head movement, and locality. LinguisticInquiry 28:423–460.

Rosenbaum, Peter. 1967. The grammar of English predicate complement sen-tential complementation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral Dissertation,MIT, Cambridge, MA.

Ross, John R. 1969. Guess who? In CLS 5: Papers from the Fifth Annual Meet-ing of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. Robert I. Binnick, Alice Davison,Georgia Green, and Jerry Morgan, 252–286. University of Chicago.

Ruzicka, Rudolf. 1994. Asymmetry and parallelism between affirmative andnegative (ne) (est’) gde spat’. Russian Linguistics 18:53–72.

Rubinstein, Aynat. 2007. Between modals and verbs: The dual role of mustand need. First generals paper, University of Massachusetts.

Rudin, Catherine. 1986. Aspects of Bulgarian syntax: Complementizers andwh-constructions . Columbus, OH: Slavica Publishers.

Rudin, Catherine. 1988. On multiple questions and multiple wh-fronting. Nat-ural Language & Linguistic Theory 6:445–501.

Rudin, Catherine. 2008. Multiple wh non-interrogatives. Manuscript, WayneState College.

Bibliography 325

Rullmann, Hotze, and Sigrid Beck. 1998. Presupposition projection and theinterpretation of which-phrases. In SALT 8: Proceedings from the 8th Confer-ence on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, ed. Devon Strolovitch and AaronLawson, 215–232. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

Sauerland, Uli. 1998. The meaning of chains. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT,Cambridge, MA.

Sauerland, Uli. 2005. Don’t interpret focus: Why a presuppositional accountof focus fails, and how a presuppositional account of givenness works. InProceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 9 , ed. Emar Maier, Corien Bary, andJanneke Huitink, 370–384. University of Nijmegen.

Sauerland, Uli, and Sarah Hulsey. 2004. Sorting out relative clauses.Manuscript.

Saxmatov, A. A. 1963. Sintaksis russkogo jazyka. The Hague: Mouton.

Schein, Barry. 1993. Plurals and events . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Schein, Barry. to appear. Conjunction reduction redux . Cambridge, MA: MITPress.

Schwarz, Florian. 2007. On needing propositions and looking for prop-erties. In SALT 16: Proceedings from the 16th Conference on Seman-tics and Linguistic Theory, ed. Christopher Tancredi, Makoto Kanazawa,Ikumi Imani, and Kiyomi Kusumoto. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications. URLhttp://research.nii.ac.jp/salt16/proceedings/.

Schwarzschild, Roger. 1999. Givenness, AvoidF and other constraints on theplacement of accent. Natural Language Semantics 7:141–177.

Selkirk, Elisabeth, and Angelika Kratzer. 2009. Distinguishing contrastive, new,and given information. Presented at the Workshop on Prosody and Meaning,Barcelona.

Simık, Radek. 2008a. Czech modal existential wh-constructions as vP-level free relatives. In Linguistics in the netherlands 2008 , ed.Marjo van Koppen and Bert Botma, 121–132. John Benjamins. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1075/avt.25.14sim.

Simık, Radek. 2008b. Wh-words in modal existential wh-constructions as non-canonical free choice items. Presented at the workshop Free choiceness: facts,models, and problems (ESSLLI, Hamburg).

Simık, Radek. 2009a. Hamblin pronouns in modal existential wh-constructions.In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 17: The Yale Meeting 2008 , ed.Maria Babyonyshev, Daria Kavitskaya, and Jodi Reich, 187–202. Ann Arbor,MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.

326 Bibliography

Simık, Radek. 2009b. Lambda abstrakce a neurcita zajmena v uzkem a sirokemohnisku. Slovo a slovesnost 70:342–352.

Simık, Radek. 2010. Control in modal existential wh-constructions and thePRO-wh generalization. Presented at SinFonIJA 3 (Novi Sad, Serbia) andFDSL 8.5 (Brno, Czech Republic).

Simık, Radek. to appear. Interpretation of multiple interrogatives: An informa-tion structure sensitive account. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics18: The Second Cornell Meeting 2009 . Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Pub-lications.

Sportiche, Dominique. 1992. Clitic constructions. Manuscript, University ofCalifornia, Los Angeles.

Starke, Michal. 2001. Move dissolves into merge: A theory of locality. DoctoralDissertation.

Starke, Michal. 2009. Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to lan-guage. In Tromsø Working Papers on Language and Linguistics: Nordlyd36.1 [Special issue on nanosyntax] , ed. Peter Svenonius, Gillian Ramchand,Michal Starke, and Knut Tarald Taraldsen, 1–6. Tromsø: CASTL. URLhttp://www.ub.uit.no/baser/nordlyd.

von Stechow, Arnim. 1991. Current issues in the theory of focus. In Se-mantik/semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research, ed.Arnim von Stechow and Dieter Wunderlich, 804–825. Berlin: Mouton deGruyter.

Stjepanovic, Sandra. 1998a. On the placement of Serbo-Croatian clitics: Evi-dence from VP ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 29:527–537.

Stjepanovic, Sandra. 1998b. What do second-position cliticization, scrambling,and multiple wh-fronting have in common. Doctoral Dissertation, Universityof Connecticut, Storrs.

Stoyanova, Marina. 2009. Unique focus . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Sturgeon, Anne. 2007. Another look at multiple wh-questions in Czech. InFormal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 15: The Toronto Meeting 2006 , ed.Richard Compton, Magdalena Goledzinowska, and Ulyana Savchenko, 402–416. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.

Suner, Margarita. 1983. Free relatives and the matching parameter. The Lin-guistic Review 3:363–387.

Suranyi, Balazs. 2005. Indefinite wh-pronouns and the modal existential wh-constructions in Hungarian. Abstract from the 7th International Conferenceon the Structure of Hungarian (ICSH7), Veszprem, Hungary, May 2005.

Bibliography 327

Szabolcsi, Anna. 1986. From the definiteness effect to lexical integrity. In Topic,focus, and configurationality, ed. Werner Abraham and Sjaak de Meij, 321–348. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Szabolcsi, Anna. 1994. The noun phrase. In Syntax and semantics 27: Thesyntactic structure of Hungarian, ed. Ferenc Kiefer and Katalin E. Kiss,179–274. New York: Academic Press.

Szczegielniak, Adam. 2004. Relativization and ellipsis. Doctoral Dissertation,Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

Thomas, Guillaume. 2008a. Consequences of modal existential constructionsfor the doubly filled Comp phenomenon in French. Manuscript, MIT.

Thomas, Guillaume. 2008b. Issues in the syntax of French modal existentialconstructions. Presented at ECO 5: The Fifth East Coast Workshop inSyntax, University of Connecticut.

Toman, Jindrich. 1981. Aspects of multiple wh-movement. In Levels of syntacticrepresentation, ed. Robert May and Jan Koster, 293–302. Dordrecht: Foris.

Toman, Jindrich. 1999. On clitic displacement. In Topics in South Slavic syntaxand semantics , ed. Mila Dimitrova-Vulchanova and Lars Hellan, 205–228.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Toth, Ildiko. 2000. Inflected infinitives in Hungarian. Doctoral Dissertation,Tilburg University.

Travis, Lisa. 1984. Parameters and effects of word order variation. DoctoralDissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2010. High applicatives are not high enough: A carto-graphic solution. Manuscript, Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Vallduvı, Enric. 1992. The informational component . New York: Garland.

Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1974. French relative clauses . Cambridge, MA: MITPress.

Veselovska, Ludmila. 1993. Wh-movement and multiple questions in Czech.Master’s thesis, Durham University.

de Vries, Mark. 2002. The syntax of relativization. Doctoral Dissertation,University of Amsterdam [Published in LOT dissertation series].

Wachowicz, Krystyna. 1974. On the syntax and semantics of multiple questions.Doctoral Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

Williams, Edwin. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11:203–238.

328 Bibliography

von Wright, George. 1963. Norm and action. New York: Humanities Press.

Wurmbrand, Susi. 1998. Infinitives. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge,MA.

Wurmbrand, Susi. 2001. Infinitives: Restructuring and clause structure. Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter.

Yoon, Eun Soon. 1989. A syntactic study of Russian sentences of the type mnenecego delat’. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.

Zimmermann, Thomas Ede. 1993. On the proper treatment of opacity in certainverbs. Natural Language Semantics 1:149–179.

Zubaty, Josef. 1922. Mam co delati. Nase rec 6:65–71.

Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 2000. A head raising analysis of restrictive relative clausesin Dutch. In The syntax of relative clauses , ed. Artemis Alexiadou, Paul Law,Andre Meinunger, and Chris Wilder, 349–385. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 2009. Prospects for top-down derivation. Catalan Journalof Linguistics 8:161–187.