Empowered lives Resilient nations

FUNDING COMPENDIUM 2014

United Nations Development Programme

FUNDING COMPENDIUM 2014 2

CONTENTS

FOREWORD

UNDP IN 2014

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

RESOURCES BY FUNDING TYPE

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL

CORE RESOURCES

OTHER RESOURCES

Domestic Resources

Thematic Funds

Vertical Funds

UN Pooled Funds

RESOURCES BY PARTNER

3

4

5

6

8

11

15

16

18

20

22

24

Cover photo With UNDP support communities in Benin are getting access to renewable energy copyUNDP Benin

FOREWORD2015 IS A LANDMARK YEAR World leadersrsquo decisions in Sendai Addis Ababa New York and Paris offer a major opportunity to strengthen international cooperation for sustainable development and resilience The issues are not new But an opportunity to address them comprehensively is rare UNDP will pursue all available avenues to help people and countries prosper

WE WILL

Help countries raise domestic funds The Addis Ababa Action Agenda (AAAA) calls for global support to help developing countries achieve self-reliance and sustainable economic transformation by raising domestic revenues and attracting private finance Official development assistance (ODA) providers are recommitting to achieve the target of 07 of gross national income for ODA and 015 to 020 for least developed countries

Help countries explore public financing beyond ODA A more sophisticated approach to financing for development is needed Public and private finance (domestic and international) beyond ODA is needed We must also ensure that development financing is informed by risk

Pursue partnerships Different sources of financing are increasingly reinforcing each other and to ensure success we must build strong partnerships across governments the private sector civil society academia research institutions and multilateral organizations

Support countries to use public financing to leverage private funds International public finance will continue to play an important role in complementing domestic resources especially in the poorest and most vulnerable countries Given the scale of investments needed to achieve the SDGs additional financing is needed using public funds to leverage private investments

UNDP recognizes the important role of all resourcesmdashdomestic and international public and privatemdash to achieve sustainable development and implement the SDGs We will continue to be a partner to governments and help governments access different forms of development funds for country-driven priorities and strategies in line with our Strategic Plan and the SDGs

As the UNrsquos lead development agency UNDP oversees a nearly $5 billion portfolio The majority of initiatives we support are funded by earmarked resources from governments multilateral partners and vertical funds such as the Global Environment Facility and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM) It is the continuing support to our core budget from partner countriesmdashtotaling $793 million in 2014mdashthat makes all those other initiatives possible Core funding is the bedrock of the organization and is what makes UNDP a reliable and effective partner

UNDP is grateful to our partners for their continued trust and support This report is part of our ongoing effort to recognize all contributions and demonstrate greater transparency

Michael OrsquoNeillAssistant Secretary-General amp

Assistant AdministratorBureau of External Relations and Advocacy

UNDP IN 2014

MEASURABLE IMPROVEMENT IN THE LIVES OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE

Core resources enable UNDP to carry out its Strategic Plan maximize value from other forms of financing and achieve development results In 2014 UNDP projects led to

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PATHWAYS

bull 112 million people (57 million women) benefiting from improved livelihoods in 94 countries

bull 920000 new jobs (41 for women) created in 77 countries

bull 33 countries adopting policies and systems to boost employment and livelihoods

bull Technology support in 48 countries to phase out gases that destroy the ozone layer

bull 40 countries implementing or completing MDG acceleration framework action plans

bull 39 countries implementing measures towards low-emission and climate-resilient development objectives

INCLUSIVE AND EFFECTIVE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE

bull Over 18 million new voters registered in 21 countries including nearly 4 million in Afghanistan where one million more women registered than in 2009

bull 750000 people (51 women) in 22 countries gaining access to legal aid services

bull 14 million people receiving antiretroviral treatment in 20 countries

bull 22 million people receiving HIV-related behavioural change communication in 20 countries

bull Over 7 million people (49 women) expressing their vision for the future through the UNDP hosted lsquoMy Worldrsquo global survey the largest crowd-sourcing exercise in United Nations history

RESILIENCE BUILDING

bull 98 new disaster reduction and adaptation plans in place in 23 countries

bull 21 countries with enforceable lawsregulations to address disaster and climate risks

bull 13 million people achieving better access to energy in 26 countries

bull 158 new early warning systems in 17 countries

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The present Compendium gives an overview of UNDPrsquos funding resources

1 The first chapter shows resources by funding typemdashregular resources also referred to as core and other resourcesmdashas well as funding trends over the past five years

2 The second chapter explains how UNDP receives contributions from its partners

a Regular or ldquocorerdquo resources with a list of UNDPrsquos top contributors in 2014 and contribution trends over the past five years

b Funds earmarked to programmes and projects

c Thematic funding including the importance of flexible funding and total contributions received by UNDP for Thematic Trust Funds since 2010

d Vertical funds mainly with the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility

e UN pooled funds featuring UNDPrsquos role as Administrative Agent for Multi-Donor Trust Funds and Joint Programmes in the UN system and the share of pooled funds UNDP implements as a participating organization

3 The third chapter shows funding by partnermdashsuch as governments multi-lateral organizations and UN entities

All funding channels are important for UNDP to mobilize the resources required to deliver on our Strategic Plan But core funds by virtue of not being earmarked are the most adaptable in addressing the priorities outlined in the Plan

RESOURCES BY FUNDING TYPE 6

RESOURCES BY

FUNDING TYPE

RESOURCES BY FUNDING TYPE 7

Over the past five years there has been a decline in the amount of core resource contributions to UNDP an increase in highly earmarked contributions and a growing imbalance between core and other resources

COREOTHER RESOURCES TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING TYPE

In 2014 overall contributions to UNDP amounted to $4715 billion decreasing by 3 compared to $484 billion in 2013 Core resources (comprising 17 of total contributions) decreased by 11 to $793 million from $896 million in 2013 due to reduced contributions from partners currency fluctuations and non-receipt of contributions intended for 2014 Other resources received amounted to $3922 billion falling by 1 from $3944 billion in 2013

1 This figure excludes cash and in-kind contributions towards Government Local Office Costs (GLOC)

Other Resources($392B)

Regular Resources($793M)17

83

0

$1B

$2B

$3B

$4B

$5B

$6B

20142013201220112010

($4715B)($4840B)($4826B)($5055B)

($5277B)

Other ResourcesRegular Resources Total

82($4310B)

18($967M)

81($4080B)

19($975M)

82($3980B)

18($846M)

81($3944B)

19($896M)

83($3922B)

17($793M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 8

RESOURCES BY

FUNDING CHANNEL

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 9

With total resources in the range of $5 billion annually and programmes in 177 countries and territories contributions to UNDP are channelled through any of the following modalities 1) voluntary contributions to core resources 2) funds intended for specific thematic areas 3) funds earmarked to programmes and projects including government domestic resources 4) UN pooled funds or 5) funds confined to a single development domain or vertical funds

The illustration below shows the range of the flexibility of resources offered by the different funding channels Core resources offer the most flexibility while vertical funds offer the least

MORE FLEXIBLE FUNDING LESS FLEXIBLE FUNDING

CORE

The bedrock of the Organization for its

exibility

THEMATIC FUNDING

Lightly earmarked funding that allows the Organization to allocate funds to programmes

and projects in accordance with needs

and in line with the Strategic Plan

FUNDING EARMARKED TO PROGRAMMES OR

PROJECTS

Bilateral andmultilateral

contributions including domestic ressources from

programme countries

UN POOLED FUNDS

Funds from multiple partners allocated to

multiple implementing entities to support

specic national regional or global priorities

Multi-Donor Trust Funds and Joint Programmes

are the main mechanisms used by the UN system

VERTICAL FUNDS

Funds intended for a specic development

area (eg health climate change etc) approved for projects through a

call-for-proposals process

The largest share of contributions received by UNDP in 2014 was from bilateral and multilateral funds (58) of which 19 are domestic resources invested by programme countries Core resources (17) was the second largest followed by vertical funds (15) UN pooled funds (6) thematic funds (3) and Government Local Office Costs or GLOC (1)

UN Pooled funds(6)

Bilateral and multilateral funds(58)

(Domestic resources)(19)

Vertical funds(15)

Core resources(17)

GLOC(1)

Thematic funds(3)

FUNDING BY CHANNEL 2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 10

FUNDING BY CHANNEL 2009-2014

Since 2009 funds earmarked to programmes and projects have remained the biggest source of funding for UNDP

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

Thematic Funds

UN Pooled Funds

Vertical Funds

Core

Domestic Resources

Funds earmarked to programmes and projects

201420132012201120102009

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 11

CORE RESOURCES

Core resources form the bedrock of UNDP and hence are the bedrock of support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 56 partners contributed $793 million to core OECDDAC members contributed 975 of total core contribu-tions with the top 15 accounting for 96 of the total A total of $1927 million was received from non-DAC members

CORE CONTRIBUTIONS 2014

Africa2 Countries ($011M)

Other States1 Country ($010M)

Latin America and the Caribbean5 Countries ($055M)

Arab States7 Countries ($358M)

Europe and the CIS5 Countries ($428M)

Asia and the Pacic14 Countries ($1123M)

Non-DAC Members(25)

DAC Members(975)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 12

TOP 30 CONTRIBUTORS TO CORE RESOURCES

Contributions for 2014 from Canada and India were received in 2015 Contribution from Australia excludes amount intended for 2013 and received in 2014

0 $20M $40M $60M $80M $100M $120M

United Arab Emirates

Bangladesh

Iraq

Kuwait

Thailand

Russian Federation

Saudi Arabia

Austria

Turkey

Luxembourg

China

India

Italy

Korea Republic of

New Zealand

Ireland

Australia

France

Belgium

Germany

Finland

Canada

Netherlands

Denmark

Switzerland

Sweden

Japan

United States of America

United Kingdom

Norway $1122M

$903M

$810M

$805M

$729M

$635M

$601M

$368M

$356M

$303M

$291M

$237M

$186M

$181M

$117M

$66M

$64M

$44M

$43M

$38M

$36M

$30M

$21M

$20M

$11M

$09M

$06M

$05M

$04M

$03M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 13

PARTNERS THAT INCREASED THEIR CORE CONTRIBUTION IN 2014

PARTNERS THAT MADE EARLY PAYMENTS IN 2013 AND 2014

Austria

Bangladesh

Chile

Costa Rica

Estonia

Finland

France

Ireland

Kuwait

Belgium

Chile

Iraq

Mozambique

Luxembourg

New Zealand

Norway

Saudi Arabia

Singapore

South Africa

Thailand

UAE

United Kingdom

Republic of Korea

Sri Lanka

United States

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP 14

PARTNERS THAT INVEST IN UNDPrsquoS CORE FUNDING

JOIN FORCES WITH A LEADING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION AND ENSURE GLOBAL IMPACT

bull UNDP offers 50 years of experience in sustainable development and remains the partner of choice for governments and other actors across the globe to eradicate poverty and reduce inequalities and exclusion

bull Core resources enable UNDP to provide the international community with the most extensive field-based presence of the multilateral system to help countries deliver on internationally agreed development goals UNDPrsquos global reach represents the most cost-effective and strategic complement to bilateral cooperation

PROMOTE COHERENCE OF THE UN DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS AND TRANSPARENCY

bull Core resources form the bedrock of the UN Resident Coordinator system at country levelmdashmanaged and principally funded by UNDPmdash which brings together all UN development agencies for maximum impact This is crucial for UN country teamsrsquo support to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals

bull Core funds support the high standards of efficiency quality assurance and transparency UNDP has attained The new organizational structure is leaner by 10 overall and by 30 in New York allowing us to operate more effectively at the country level Tighter standards for project quality were introduced integrating UNDPrsquos new social and environmental standards In 2014 UNDP ranked as the most transparent organization in the world on the International Aid Transparency Index

SUPPORT THE MOST VULNERABLE PROMOTE EQUITY AND ENABLE PROMPT RESPONSE TO CRISIS

bull Core funds are the pillar of our support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 UNDP allocated 90 of core programme resources to Low Income Countries (LICs) and 74 to Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Although only 10 of UNDPrsquos core programme resources went to Middle Income Countries (MICs) for every $1 of core resources invested in MICs UNDP leveraged $25 in other resources

bull UNDPrsquos core funds enable us to respond quickly and flexibly to crises The UN Secretary-General has tasked UNDP with leading the UN systemrsquos support for economic recovery from the Ebola crisis In 2014 UNDP allocated $545 million of core funds for the immediate Ebola response and helped pay 100 for response workers in affected countries to ensure uninterrupted health services case tracing and safe burials

WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL OTHER RESOURCES 15

OTHER RESOURCESOther resources range from lightly earmarked funds such as in the case of thematic funds to funds highly earmarked to specific programmes and projects Funds can be earmarked at the global regional country and most commonly project levels UN pooled funds and vertical funds are also earmarked for specific purposes

Funds earmarked to specific programmes and projects are received by UNDP either through a co-financing modality called ldquocost-sharingrdquo or in the form of trust funds The table below shows the top government contributors to other resources in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Chile

Uruguay

Armenia

China

Panama

Turkey

Republic of Korea

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Canada

Finland

Australia

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Denmark

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Switzerland

Brazil

Netherlands

Sweden

Peru

Norway

United Kingdom

Germany

Argentina

Japan

United States $4179M

$3046M

$1981M

$1252M

$927M

$910M

$885M

$875M

$675M

$613M

$552M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$353M

$352M

$296M

$250M

$230M

$229M

$217M

$209M

$202M

$185M

$183M

$151M

$143M

$136M

$130M

$123M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL DOMESTIC RESOURCES 16

DOMESTIC RESOURCESDomestic resources are funds earmarked to programmes and projects They are contributions channelled through UNDP by governments from their domestic resources through a modality known as ldquogovernment cost-sharingrdquo

The chart below ranks countriesrsquo domestic contributions through government cost-sharing (GCS) in terms of volume It does not reflect the relative importance of GCS to these countries as a proportion of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Some countries contribute a greater percentage of their GDPs towards GCS even if the volume of their contributions is smaller

For example Sao Tome and Principe contributed approximately 017 of its GDP towards GCS Similarly Guinea-Bis-sau Timor-Leste Benin and Chad contributed 009 006 005 and 005 respectively of their GDP towards GCS With a total of $851 million contributed in 2014 an increasing number of programme countries like Senegal are channelling their domestic resources towards a UNDP programme or project in support of their national priorities

0 $50M $100M $150M $200M

Equatorial Guinea

Kazakhstan

Macedonia former Yugoslav Rep

Guatemala

Serbia

Guyana

Azerbaijan

Honduras

Chad

Mexico

United Republic of Tanzania

Nigeria

India

Turkey

Morocco

Chile

China

Uruguay

Dominican Republic

Armenia

Panama

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Colombia

Egypt

Venezuela

Brazil

Peru

Argentina $1978M

$852M

$601M

$532M

$476M

$441M

$350M

$296M

$217M

$213M

$162M

$151M

$136M

$122M

$121M

$120M

$113M

$104M

$102M

$90M

$87M

$76M

$76M

$67M

$66M

$63M

$63M

$62M

$57M

$48M

$44M

$43M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL SENEGAL INVESTS USD 198 MILLION TO BOOST RURAL DEVELOPMENT 17

Senegal invests USD 198 million to boost rural developmentSenegal has initiated a vast local development programme to increase living standards across the countryside while at the same time stimulating the national economy

The initiative to be implemented by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) will accelerate the construction of roads and water points invest in agriculture and entrepreneurship and facilitate peoplersquos access to energy services

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 18

THEMATIC FUNDS

With thematic funds partners channel their contributions to support activities on a particular theme UNDP has thematic funds for Crisis Prevention and Recovery Environment Democratic Governance Poverty Reduction Gender and Information Communication and Technology In 2014 contributions to thematic funds were $119 million or 3 of total contributions

0

$30M

$60M

$90M

$120M

$150M

Poverty Reduction

Information Communication and Technology

Gender

Environment

Democratic Governance

Crisis Prevention and Recovery

20142013201220112010

THEMATIC TRUST FUND CONTRIBUTIONS 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 19

TOP CONTRIBUTORS TO THEMATIC FUNDS

NEW THEMATIC WINDOWS

UNDP is streamlining its thematic funding ldquowindowsrdquo to better respond to countriesrsquo needs and ensure that development funds are utilized more effectively and efficiently through improved management arrangements and results reporting

The new thematic windows to be operational in 2016 are in line with the objectives of the Strategic Plan and provide a vehicle for minimally earmarked contributions to be allocated to address priority needs and deliver quality results

GOVERNANCE AND PEACEBUILDING

bull Democratic Governancebull Conict Preventionbull HIVHealth and Development

POVERTY ERADICATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

bull Environment Mainstreamingbull Gender Empowerment and Equality

CLIMATE CHANGE AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION

bull Climate Changebull Disaster Risk Reduction

CRISIS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

bull Immediate Response to Crisisbull Crisis Recovery

INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING

0 $5M $10M $15M $20M $25M $30M

United States

Australia

Finland

Luxembourg

Sweden

Switzerland

Denmark

Norway

United Kingdom

Netherlands

Germany $291M

$244M

$148M

$119M

$79M

$63M

$62M

$45M

$42M

$36M

$18M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 20

VERTICAL FUNDS

Vertical funds are created in response to single-issue advocacy campaigns and to tackle specific development issues They are governed by Steering Committees which decide on funding portfolios and allocation criteria and are assisted by independent Secretariats

Of the vertical funds UNDP engages with the Global Fund is the largest followed by the Global Environmental Facility and the Montreal Protocol

GLOBAL FUND

UNDP has partnered with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria since 2003 supporting pro-grammes in countries with limited ability to receive and manage this kind of fund

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY

As a Global Environmental Facility (GEF) implementing agency since 1992 UNDP supports countries to secure GEF resources and to meet global environmental obligations UNDP offers integrated technical services for countries including assistance on eligibility assessment programme formulation mobilization of co-financing implementation oversight and knowledge and results management

MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL

UNDP as an implementing agency of the Multilateral Fund supports investment projects demonstration projects that test approaches to development challenges and provides technical assistance and feasibility studies

Montreal Protocol($25M)

Global Fund($412M)

GEF($301M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 21

GREEN CLIMATE FUND

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a new fund created under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) aimed at combatting urgent and serious effects of climate change It is designed to support developing countries move towards low-emission and climate-resilient development

The GCF Board has approved UNDP as the first UN agency that will be able to access the Fundrsquos resources for devel-oping countries alongside six other entities from the public and private sector

The accreditation by GCF is a significant step allowing UNDP to continue its leadership role in scaling up climate change mitigation and adaptation for sustainable development

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 22

UN POOLED FUNDS

Pooled fundingmdashmulti-donor trust funds (MDTFs) and joint programmesmdashis a mechanism for combining resources from multiple development partners and allocating such resources to multiple implementing entities to support specific national regional or global priorities

UNDP hosts the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO) established in 2003 to facilitate coordinated action through-out the UN system It achieves this in part by designing and administering pooled financing instruments that are efficient accountable and transparent As the appointed fund administrator administrative agent the MPTFO helps design funds and channel contributions from a large number of contributors

EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT POOLED FUND FUNCTIONS AND ADDED VALUE

MAIN FUNCTION OF THE FUND MAIN ADDED VALUE OF THE FUND

COHERENCEFills critical gaps and under-financed priorities to ensure a coherent and sequenced response in line with a strategic framework

CONSOLIDATIONReduces fragmentation with respect to particular priorities In many cases is the largest investment vehicle

SPECIALIZED OR THEMATIC

Has a specific expertise and focus on a particular thematic issue Usually the case for global funds

RISK MANAGEMENTReduces risks to governments and financial contributors through a comprehensive risk and result-based management system

INNOVATIONProvides a mechanism for clear attribution and transparency from innovative sources of finance Can also deepen national financing systems

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

FUNDING COMPENDIUM 2014 2

CONTENTS

FOREWORD

UNDP IN 2014

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

RESOURCES BY FUNDING TYPE

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL

CORE RESOURCES

OTHER RESOURCES

Domestic Resources

Thematic Funds

Vertical Funds

UN Pooled Funds

RESOURCES BY PARTNER

3

4

5

6

8

11

15

16

18

20

22

24

Cover photo With UNDP support communities in Benin are getting access to renewable energy copyUNDP Benin

FOREWORD2015 IS A LANDMARK YEAR World leadersrsquo decisions in Sendai Addis Ababa New York and Paris offer a major opportunity to strengthen international cooperation for sustainable development and resilience The issues are not new But an opportunity to address them comprehensively is rare UNDP will pursue all available avenues to help people and countries prosper

WE WILL

Help countries raise domestic funds The Addis Ababa Action Agenda (AAAA) calls for global support to help developing countries achieve self-reliance and sustainable economic transformation by raising domestic revenues and attracting private finance Official development assistance (ODA) providers are recommitting to achieve the target of 07 of gross national income for ODA and 015 to 020 for least developed countries

Help countries explore public financing beyond ODA A more sophisticated approach to financing for development is needed Public and private finance (domestic and international) beyond ODA is needed We must also ensure that development financing is informed by risk

Pursue partnerships Different sources of financing are increasingly reinforcing each other and to ensure success we must build strong partnerships across governments the private sector civil society academia research institutions and multilateral organizations

Support countries to use public financing to leverage private funds International public finance will continue to play an important role in complementing domestic resources especially in the poorest and most vulnerable countries Given the scale of investments needed to achieve the SDGs additional financing is needed using public funds to leverage private investments

UNDP recognizes the important role of all resourcesmdashdomestic and international public and privatemdash to achieve sustainable development and implement the SDGs We will continue to be a partner to governments and help governments access different forms of development funds for country-driven priorities and strategies in line with our Strategic Plan and the SDGs

As the UNrsquos lead development agency UNDP oversees a nearly $5 billion portfolio The majority of initiatives we support are funded by earmarked resources from governments multilateral partners and vertical funds such as the Global Environment Facility and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM) It is the continuing support to our core budget from partner countriesmdashtotaling $793 million in 2014mdashthat makes all those other initiatives possible Core funding is the bedrock of the organization and is what makes UNDP a reliable and effective partner

UNDP is grateful to our partners for their continued trust and support This report is part of our ongoing effort to recognize all contributions and demonstrate greater transparency

Michael OrsquoNeillAssistant Secretary-General amp

Assistant AdministratorBureau of External Relations and Advocacy

UNDP IN 2014

MEASURABLE IMPROVEMENT IN THE LIVES OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE

Core resources enable UNDP to carry out its Strategic Plan maximize value from other forms of financing and achieve development results In 2014 UNDP projects led to

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PATHWAYS

bull 112 million people (57 million women) benefiting from improved livelihoods in 94 countries

bull 920000 new jobs (41 for women) created in 77 countries

bull 33 countries adopting policies and systems to boost employment and livelihoods

bull Technology support in 48 countries to phase out gases that destroy the ozone layer

bull 40 countries implementing or completing MDG acceleration framework action plans

bull 39 countries implementing measures towards low-emission and climate-resilient development objectives

INCLUSIVE AND EFFECTIVE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE

bull Over 18 million new voters registered in 21 countries including nearly 4 million in Afghanistan where one million more women registered than in 2009

bull 750000 people (51 women) in 22 countries gaining access to legal aid services

bull 14 million people receiving antiretroviral treatment in 20 countries

bull 22 million people receiving HIV-related behavioural change communication in 20 countries

bull Over 7 million people (49 women) expressing their vision for the future through the UNDP hosted lsquoMy Worldrsquo global survey the largest crowd-sourcing exercise in United Nations history

RESILIENCE BUILDING

bull 98 new disaster reduction and adaptation plans in place in 23 countries

bull 21 countries with enforceable lawsregulations to address disaster and climate risks

bull 13 million people achieving better access to energy in 26 countries

bull 158 new early warning systems in 17 countries

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The present Compendium gives an overview of UNDPrsquos funding resources

1 The first chapter shows resources by funding typemdashregular resources also referred to as core and other resourcesmdashas well as funding trends over the past five years

2 The second chapter explains how UNDP receives contributions from its partners

a Regular or ldquocorerdquo resources with a list of UNDPrsquos top contributors in 2014 and contribution trends over the past five years

b Funds earmarked to programmes and projects

c Thematic funding including the importance of flexible funding and total contributions received by UNDP for Thematic Trust Funds since 2010

d Vertical funds mainly with the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility

e UN pooled funds featuring UNDPrsquos role as Administrative Agent for Multi-Donor Trust Funds and Joint Programmes in the UN system and the share of pooled funds UNDP implements as a participating organization

3 The third chapter shows funding by partnermdashsuch as governments multi-lateral organizations and UN entities

All funding channels are important for UNDP to mobilize the resources required to deliver on our Strategic Plan But core funds by virtue of not being earmarked are the most adaptable in addressing the priorities outlined in the Plan

RESOURCES BY FUNDING TYPE 6

RESOURCES BY

FUNDING TYPE

RESOURCES BY FUNDING TYPE 7

Over the past five years there has been a decline in the amount of core resource contributions to UNDP an increase in highly earmarked contributions and a growing imbalance between core and other resources

COREOTHER RESOURCES TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING TYPE

In 2014 overall contributions to UNDP amounted to $4715 billion decreasing by 3 compared to $484 billion in 2013 Core resources (comprising 17 of total contributions) decreased by 11 to $793 million from $896 million in 2013 due to reduced contributions from partners currency fluctuations and non-receipt of contributions intended for 2014 Other resources received amounted to $3922 billion falling by 1 from $3944 billion in 2013

1 This figure excludes cash and in-kind contributions towards Government Local Office Costs (GLOC)

Other Resources($392B)

Regular Resources($793M)17

83

0

$1B

$2B

$3B

$4B

$5B

$6B

20142013201220112010

($4715B)($4840B)($4826B)($5055B)

($5277B)

Other ResourcesRegular Resources Total

82($4310B)

18($967M)

81($4080B)

19($975M)

82($3980B)

18($846M)

81($3944B)

19($896M)

83($3922B)

17($793M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 8

RESOURCES BY

FUNDING CHANNEL

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 9

With total resources in the range of $5 billion annually and programmes in 177 countries and territories contributions to UNDP are channelled through any of the following modalities 1) voluntary contributions to core resources 2) funds intended for specific thematic areas 3) funds earmarked to programmes and projects including government domestic resources 4) UN pooled funds or 5) funds confined to a single development domain or vertical funds

The illustration below shows the range of the flexibility of resources offered by the different funding channels Core resources offer the most flexibility while vertical funds offer the least

MORE FLEXIBLE FUNDING LESS FLEXIBLE FUNDING

CORE

The bedrock of the Organization for its

exibility

THEMATIC FUNDING

Lightly earmarked funding that allows the Organization to allocate funds to programmes

and projects in accordance with needs

and in line with the Strategic Plan

FUNDING EARMARKED TO PROGRAMMES OR

PROJECTS

Bilateral andmultilateral

contributions including domestic ressources from

programme countries

UN POOLED FUNDS

Funds from multiple partners allocated to

multiple implementing entities to support

specic national regional or global priorities

Multi-Donor Trust Funds and Joint Programmes

are the main mechanisms used by the UN system

VERTICAL FUNDS

Funds intended for a specic development

area (eg health climate change etc) approved for projects through a

call-for-proposals process

The largest share of contributions received by UNDP in 2014 was from bilateral and multilateral funds (58) of which 19 are domestic resources invested by programme countries Core resources (17) was the second largest followed by vertical funds (15) UN pooled funds (6) thematic funds (3) and Government Local Office Costs or GLOC (1)

UN Pooled funds(6)

Bilateral and multilateral funds(58)

(Domestic resources)(19)

Vertical funds(15)

Core resources(17)

GLOC(1)

Thematic funds(3)

FUNDING BY CHANNEL 2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 10

FUNDING BY CHANNEL 2009-2014

Since 2009 funds earmarked to programmes and projects have remained the biggest source of funding for UNDP

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

Thematic Funds

UN Pooled Funds

Vertical Funds

Core

Domestic Resources

Funds earmarked to programmes and projects

201420132012201120102009

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 11

CORE RESOURCES

Core resources form the bedrock of UNDP and hence are the bedrock of support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 56 partners contributed $793 million to core OECDDAC members contributed 975 of total core contribu-tions with the top 15 accounting for 96 of the total A total of $1927 million was received from non-DAC members

CORE CONTRIBUTIONS 2014

Africa2 Countries ($011M)

Other States1 Country ($010M)

Latin America and the Caribbean5 Countries ($055M)

Arab States7 Countries ($358M)

Europe and the CIS5 Countries ($428M)

Asia and the Pacic14 Countries ($1123M)

Non-DAC Members(25)

DAC Members(975)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 12

TOP 30 CONTRIBUTORS TO CORE RESOURCES

Contributions for 2014 from Canada and India were received in 2015 Contribution from Australia excludes amount intended for 2013 and received in 2014

0 $20M $40M $60M $80M $100M $120M

United Arab Emirates

Bangladesh

Iraq

Kuwait

Thailand

Russian Federation

Saudi Arabia

Austria

Turkey

Luxembourg

China

India

Italy

Korea Republic of

New Zealand

Ireland

Australia

France

Belgium

Germany

Finland

Canada

Netherlands

Denmark

Switzerland

Sweden

Japan

United States of America

United Kingdom

Norway $1122M

$903M

$810M

$805M

$729M

$635M

$601M

$368M

$356M

$303M

$291M

$237M

$186M

$181M

$117M

$66M

$64M

$44M

$43M

$38M

$36M

$30M

$21M

$20M

$11M

$09M

$06M

$05M

$04M

$03M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 13

PARTNERS THAT INCREASED THEIR CORE CONTRIBUTION IN 2014

PARTNERS THAT MADE EARLY PAYMENTS IN 2013 AND 2014

Austria

Bangladesh

Chile

Costa Rica

Estonia

Finland

France

Ireland

Kuwait

Belgium

Chile

Iraq

Mozambique

Luxembourg

New Zealand

Norway

Saudi Arabia

Singapore

South Africa

Thailand

UAE

United Kingdom

Republic of Korea

Sri Lanka

United States

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP 14

PARTNERS THAT INVEST IN UNDPrsquoS CORE FUNDING

JOIN FORCES WITH A LEADING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION AND ENSURE GLOBAL IMPACT

bull UNDP offers 50 years of experience in sustainable development and remains the partner of choice for governments and other actors across the globe to eradicate poverty and reduce inequalities and exclusion

bull Core resources enable UNDP to provide the international community with the most extensive field-based presence of the multilateral system to help countries deliver on internationally agreed development goals UNDPrsquos global reach represents the most cost-effective and strategic complement to bilateral cooperation

PROMOTE COHERENCE OF THE UN DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS AND TRANSPARENCY

bull Core resources form the bedrock of the UN Resident Coordinator system at country levelmdashmanaged and principally funded by UNDPmdash which brings together all UN development agencies for maximum impact This is crucial for UN country teamsrsquo support to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals

bull Core funds support the high standards of efficiency quality assurance and transparency UNDP has attained The new organizational structure is leaner by 10 overall and by 30 in New York allowing us to operate more effectively at the country level Tighter standards for project quality were introduced integrating UNDPrsquos new social and environmental standards In 2014 UNDP ranked as the most transparent organization in the world on the International Aid Transparency Index

SUPPORT THE MOST VULNERABLE PROMOTE EQUITY AND ENABLE PROMPT RESPONSE TO CRISIS

bull Core funds are the pillar of our support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 UNDP allocated 90 of core programme resources to Low Income Countries (LICs) and 74 to Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Although only 10 of UNDPrsquos core programme resources went to Middle Income Countries (MICs) for every $1 of core resources invested in MICs UNDP leveraged $25 in other resources

bull UNDPrsquos core funds enable us to respond quickly and flexibly to crises The UN Secretary-General has tasked UNDP with leading the UN systemrsquos support for economic recovery from the Ebola crisis In 2014 UNDP allocated $545 million of core funds for the immediate Ebola response and helped pay 100 for response workers in affected countries to ensure uninterrupted health services case tracing and safe burials

WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL OTHER RESOURCES 15

OTHER RESOURCESOther resources range from lightly earmarked funds such as in the case of thematic funds to funds highly earmarked to specific programmes and projects Funds can be earmarked at the global regional country and most commonly project levels UN pooled funds and vertical funds are also earmarked for specific purposes

Funds earmarked to specific programmes and projects are received by UNDP either through a co-financing modality called ldquocost-sharingrdquo or in the form of trust funds The table below shows the top government contributors to other resources in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Chile

Uruguay

Armenia

China

Panama

Turkey

Republic of Korea

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Canada

Finland

Australia

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Denmark

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Switzerland

Brazil

Netherlands

Sweden

Peru

Norway

United Kingdom

Germany

Argentina

Japan

United States $4179M

$3046M

$1981M

$1252M

$927M

$910M

$885M

$875M

$675M

$613M

$552M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$353M

$352M

$296M

$250M

$230M

$229M

$217M

$209M

$202M

$185M

$183M

$151M

$143M

$136M

$130M

$123M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL DOMESTIC RESOURCES 16

DOMESTIC RESOURCESDomestic resources are funds earmarked to programmes and projects They are contributions channelled through UNDP by governments from their domestic resources through a modality known as ldquogovernment cost-sharingrdquo

The chart below ranks countriesrsquo domestic contributions through government cost-sharing (GCS) in terms of volume It does not reflect the relative importance of GCS to these countries as a proportion of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Some countries contribute a greater percentage of their GDPs towards GCS even if the volume of their contributions is smaller

For example Sao Tome and Principe contributed approximately 017 of its GDP towards GCS Similarly Guinea-Bis-sau Timor-Leste Benin and Chad contributed 009 006 005 and 005 respectively of their GDP towards GCS With a total of $851 million contributed in 2014 an increasing number of programme countries like Senegal are channelling their domestic resources towards a UNDP programme or project in support of their national priorities

0 $50M $100M $150M $200M

Equatorial Guinea

Kazakhstan

Macedonia former Yugoslav Rep

Guatemala

Serbia

Guyana

Azerbaijan

Honduras

Chad

Mexico

United Republic of Tanzania

Nigeria

India

Turkey

Morocco

Chile

China

Uruguay

Dominican Republic

Armenia

Panama

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Colombia

Egypt

Venezuela

Brazil

Peru

Argentina $1978M

$852M

$601M

$532M

$476M

$441M

$350M

$296M

$217M

$213M

$162M

$151M

$136M

$122M

$121M

$120M

$113M

$104M

$102M

$90M

$87M

$76M

$76M

$67M

$66M

$63M

$63M

$62M

$57M

$48M

$44M

$43M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL SENEGAL INVESTS USD 198 MILLION TO BOOST RURAL DEVELOPMENT 17

Senegal invests USD 198 million to boost rural developmentSenegal has initiated a vast local development programme to increase living standards across the countryside while at the same time stimulating the national economy

The initiative to be implemented by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) will accelerate the construction of roads and water points invest in agriculture and entrepreneurship and facilitate peoplersquos access to energy services

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 18

THEMATIC FUNDS

With thematic funds partners channel their contributions to support activities on a particular theme UNDP has thematic funds for Crisis Prevention and Recovery Environment Democratic Governance Poverty Reduction Gender and Information Communication and Technology In 2014 contributions to thematic funds were $119 million or 3 of total contributions

0

$30M

$60M

$90M

$120M

$150M

Poverty Reduction

Information Communication and Technology

Gender

Environment

Democratic Governance

Crisis Prevention and Recovery

20142013201220112010

THEMATIC TRUST FUND CONTRIBUTIONS 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 19

TOP CONTRIBUTORS TO THEMATIC FUNDS

NEW THEMATIC WINDOWS

UNDP is streamlining its thematic funding ldquowindowsrdquo to better respond to countriesrsquo needs and ensure that development funds are utilized more effectively and efficiently through improved management arrangements and results reporting

The new thematic windows to be operational in 2016 are in line with the objectives of the Strategic Plan and provide a vehicle for minimally earmarked contributions to be allocated to address priority needs and deliver quality results

GOVERNANCE AND PEACEBUILDING

bull Democratic Governancebull Conict Preventionbull HIVHealth and Development

POVERTY ERADICATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

bull Environment Mainstreamingbull Gender Empowerment and Equality

CLIMATE CHANGE AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION

bull Climate Changebull Disaster Risk Reduction

CRISIS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

bull Immediate Response to Crisisbull Crisis Recovery

INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING

0 $5M $10M $15M $20M $25M $30M

United States

Australia

Finland

Luxembourg

Sweden

Switzerland

Denmark

Norway

United Kingdom

Netherlands

Germany $291M

$244M

$148M

$119M

$79M

$63M

$62M

$45M

$42M

$36M

$18M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 20

VERTICAL FUNDS

Vertical funds are created in response to single-issue advocacy campaigns and to tackle specific development issues They are governed by Steering Committees which decide on funding portfolios and allocation criteria and are assisted by independent Secretariats

Of the vertical funds UNDP engages with the Global Fund is the largest followed by the Global Environmental Facility and the Montreal Protocol

GLOBAL FUND

UNDP has partnered with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria since 2003 supporting pro-grammes in countries with limited ability to receive and manage this kind of fund

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY

As a Global Environmental Facility (GEF) implementing agency since 1992 UNDP supports countries to secure GEF resources and to meet global environmental obligations UNDP offers integrated technical services for countries including assistance on eligibility assessment programme formulation mobilization of co-financing implementation oversight and knowledge and results management

MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL

UNDP as an implementing agency of the Multilateral Fund supports investment projects demonstration projects that test approaches to development challenges and provides technical assistance and feasibility studies

Montreal Protocol($25M)

Global Fund($412M)

GEF($301M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 21

GREEN CLIMATE FUND

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a new fund created under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) aimed at combatting urgent and serious effects of climate change It is designed to support developing countries move towards low-emission and climate-resilient development

The GCF Board has approved UNDP as the first UN agency that will be able to access the Fundrsquos resources for devel-oping countries alongside six other entities from the public and private sector

The accreditation by GCF is a significant step allowing UNDP to continue its leadership role in scaling up climate change mitigation and adaptation for sustainable development

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 22

UN POOLED FUNDS

Pooled fundingmdashmulti-donor trust funds (MDTFs) and joint programmesmdashis a mechanism for combining resources from multiple development partners and allocating such resources to multiple implementing entities to support specific national regional or global priorities

UNDP hosts the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO) established in 2003 to facilitate coordinated action through-out the UN system It achieves this in part by designing and administering pooled financing instruments that are efficient accountable and transparent As the appointed fund administrator administrative agent the MPTFO helps design funds and channel contributions from a large number of contributors

EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT POOLED FUND FUNCTIONS AND ADDED VALUE

MAIN FUNCTION OF THE FUND MAIN ADDED VALUE OF THE FUND

COHERENCEFills critical gaps and under-financed priorities to ensure a coherent and sequenced response in line with a strategic framework

CONSOLIDATIONReduces fragmentation with respect to particular priorities In many cases is the largest investment vehicle

SPECIALIZED OR THEMATIC

Has a specific expertise and focus on a particular thematic issue Usually the case for global funds

RISK MANAGEMENTReduces risks to governments and financial contributors through a comprehensive risk and result-based management system

INNOVATIONProvides a mechanism for clear attribution and transparency from innovative sources of finance Can also deepen national financing systems

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

FOREWORD2015 IS A LANDMARK YEAR World leadersrsquo decisions in Sendai Addis Ababa New York and Paris offer a major opportunity to strengthen international cooperation for sustainable development and resilience The issues are not new But an opportunity to address them comprehensively is rare UNDP will pursue all available avenues to help people and countries prosper

WE WILL

Help countries raise domestic funds The Addis Ababa Action Agenda (AAAA) calls for global support to help developing countries achieve self-reliance and sustainable economic transformation by raising domestic revenues and attracting private finance Official development assistance (ODA) providers are recommitting to achieve the target of 07 of gross national income for ODA and 015 to 020 for least developed countries

Help countries explore public financing beyond ODA A more sophisticated approach to financing for development is needed Public and private finance (domestic and international) beyond ODA is needed We must also ensure that development financing is informed by risk

Pursue partnerships Different sources of financing are increasingly reinforcing each other and to ensure success we must build strong partnerships across governments the private sector civil society academia research institutions and multilateral organizations

Support countries to use public financing to leverage private funds International public finance will continue to play an important role in complementing domestic resources especially in the poorest and most vulnerable countries Given the scale of investments needed to achieve the SDGs additional financing is needed using public funds to leverage private investments

UNDP recognizes the important role of all resourcesmdashdomestic and international public and privatemdash to achieve sustainable development and implement the SDGs We will continue to be a partner to governments and help governments access different forms of development funds for country-driven priorities and strategies in line with our Strategic Plan and the SDGs

As the UNrsquos lead development agency UNDP oversees a nearly $5 billion portfolio The majority of initiatives we support are funded by earmarked resources from governments multilateral partners and vertical funds such as the Global Environment Facility and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM) It is the continuing support to our core budget from partner countriesmdashtotaling $793 million in 2014mdashthat makes all those other initiatives possible Core funding is the bedrock of the organization and is what makes UNDP a reliable and effective partner

UNDP is grateful to our partners for their continued trust and support This report is part of our ongoing effort to recognize all contributions and demonstrate greater transparency

Michael OrsquoNeillAssistant Secretary-General amp

Assistant AdministratorBureau of External Relations and Advocacy

UNDP IN 2014

MEASURABLE IMPROVEMENT IN THE LIVES OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE

Core resources enable UNDP to carry out its Strategic Plan maximize value from other forms of financing and achieve development results In 2014 UNDP projects led to

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PATHWAYS

bull 112 million people (57 million women) benefiting from improved livelihoods in 94 countries

bull 920000 new jobs (41 for women) created in 77 countries

bull 33 countries adopting policies and systems to boost employment and livelihoods

bull Technology support in 48 countries to phase out gases that destroy the ozone layer

bull 40 countries implementing or completing MDG acceleration framework action plans

bull 39 countries implementing measures towards low-emission and climate-resilient development objectives

INCLUSIVE AND EFFECTIVE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE

bull Over 18 million new voters registered in 21 countries including nearly 4 million in Afghanistan where one million more women registered than in 2009

bull 750000 people (51 women) in 22 countries gaining access to legal aid services

bull 14 million people receiving antiretroviral treatment in 20 countries

bull 22 million people receiving HIV-related behavioural change communication in 20 countries

bull Over 7 million people (49 women) expressing their vision for the future through the UNDP hosted lsquoMy Worldrsquo global survey the largest crowd-sourcing exercise in United Nations history

RESILIENCE BUILDING

bull 98 new disaster reduction and adaptation plans in place in 23 countries

bull 21 countries with enforceable lawsregulations to address disaster and climate risks

bull 13 million people achieving better access to energy in 26 countries

bull 158 new early warning systems in 17 countries

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The present Compendium gives an overview of UNDPrsquos funding resources

1 The first chapter shows resources by funding typemdashregular resources also referred to as core and other resourcesmdashas well as funding trends over the past five years

2 The second chapter explains how UNDP receives contributions from its partners

a Regular or ldquocorerdquo resources with a list of UNDPrsquos top contributors in 2014 and contribution trends over the past five years

b Funds earmarked to programmes and projects

c Thematic funding including the importance of flexible funding and total contributions received by UNDP for Thematic Trust Funds since 2010

d Vertical funds mainly with the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility

e UN pooled funds featuring UNDPrsquos role as Administrative Agent for Multi-Donor Trust Funds and Joint Programmes in the UN system and the share of pooled funds UNDP implements as a participating organization

3 The third chapter shows funding by partnermdashsuch as governments multi-lateral organizations and UN entities

All funding channels are important for UNDP to mobilize the resources required to deliver on our Strategic Plan But core funds by virtue of not being earmarked are the most adaptable in addressing the priorities outlined in the Plan

RESOURCES BY FUNDING TYPE 6

RESOURCES BY

FUNDING TYPE

RESOURCES BY FUNDING TYPE 7

Over the past five years there has been a decline in the amount of core resource contributions to UNDP an increase in highly earmarked contributions and a growing imbalance between core and other resources

COREOTHER RESOURCES TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING TYPE

In 2014 overall contributions to UNDP amounted to $4715 billion decreasing by 3 compared to $484 billion in 2013 Core resources (comprising 17 of total contributions) decreased by 11 to $793 million from $896 million in 2013 due to reduced contributions from partners currency fluctuations and non-receipt of contributions intended for 2014 Other resources received amounted to $3922 billion falling by 1 from $3944 billion in 2013

1 This figure excludes cash and in-kind contributions towards Government Local Office Costs (GLOC)

Other Resources($392B)

Regular Resources($793M)17

83

0

$1B

$2B

$3B

$4B

$5B

$6B

20142013201220112010

($4715B)($4840B)($4826B)($5055B)

($5277B)

Other ResourcesRegular Resources Total

82($4310B)

18($967M)

81($4080B)

19($975M)

82($3980B)

18($846M)

81($3944B)

19($896M)

83($3922B)

17($793M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 8

RESOURCES BY

FUNDING CHANNEL

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 9

With total resources in the range of $5 billion annually and programmes in 177 countries and territories contributions to UNDP are channelled through any of the following modalities 1) voluntary contributions to core resources 2) funds intended for specific thematic areas 3) funds earmarked to programmes and projects including government domestic resources 4) UN pooled funds or 5) funds confined to a single development domain or vertical funds

The illustration below shows the range of the flexibility of resources offered by the different funding channels Core resources offer the most flexibility while vertical funds offer the least

MORE FLEXIBLE FUNDING LESS FLEXIBLE FUNDING

CORE

The bedrock of the Organization for its

exibility

THEMATIC FUNDING

Lightly earmarked funding that allows the Organization to allocate funds to programmes

and projects in accordance with needs

and in line with the Strategic Plan

FUNDING EARMARKED TO PROGRAMMES OR

PROJECTS

Bilateral andmultilateral

contributions including domestic ressources from

programme countries

UN POOLED FUNDS

Funds from multiple partners allocated to

multiple implementing entities to support

specic national regional or global priorities

Multi-Donor Trust Funds and Joint Programmes

are the main mechanisms used by the UN system

VERTICAL FUNDS

Funds intended for a specic development

area (eg health climate change etc) approved for projects through a

call-for-proposals process

The largest share of contributions received by UNDP in 2014 was from bilateral and multilateral funds (58) of which 19 are domestic resources invested by programme countries Core resources (17) was the second largest followed by vertical funds (15) UN pooled funds (6) thematic funds (3) and Government Local Office Costs or GLOC (1)

UN Pooled funds(6)

Bilateral and multilateral funds(58)

(Domestic resources)(19)

Vertical funds(15)

Core resources(17)

GLOC(1)

Thematic funds(3)

FUNDING BY CHANNEL 2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 10

FUNDING BY CHANNEL 2009-2014

Since 2009 funds earmarked to programmes and projects have remained the biggest source of funding for UNDP

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

Thematic Funds

UN Pooled Funds

Vertical Funds

Core

Domestic Resources

Funds earmarked to programmes and projects

201420132012201120102009

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 11

CORE RESOURCES

Core resources form the bedrock of UNDP and hence are the bedrock of support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 56 partners contributed $793 million to core OECDDAC members contributed 975 of total core contribu-tions with the top 15 accounting for 96 of the total A total of $1927 million was received from non-DAC members

CORE CONTRIBUTIONS 2014

Africa2 Countries ($011M)

Other States1 Country ($010M)

Latin America and the Caribbean5 Countries ($055M)

Arab States7 Countries ($358M)

Europe and the CIS5 Countries ($428M)

Asia and the Pacic14 Countries ($1123M)

Non-DAC Members(25)

DAC Members(975)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 12

TOP 30 CONTRIBUTORS TO CORE RESOURCES

Contributions for 2014 from Canada and India were received in 2015 Contribution from Australia excludes amount intended for 2013 and received in 2014

0 $20M $40M $60M $80M $100M $120M

United Arab Emirates

Bangladesh

Iraq

Kuwait

Thailand

Russian Federation

Saudi Arabia

Austria

Turkey

Luxembourg

China

India

Italy

Korea Republic of

New Zealand

Ireland

Australia

France

Belgium

Germany

Finland

Canada

Netherlands

Denmark

Switzerland

Sweden

Japan

United States of America

United Kingdom

Norway $1122M

$903M

$810M

$805M

$729M

$635M

$601M

$368M

$356M

$303M

$291M

$237M

$186M

$181M

$117M

$66M

$64M

$44M

$43M

$38M

$36M

$30M

$21M

$20M

$11M

$09M

$06M

$05M

$04M

$03M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 13

PARTNERS THAT INCREASED THEIR CORE CONTRIBUTION IN 2014

PARTNERS THAT MADE EARLY PAYMENTS IN 2013 AND 2014

Austria

Bangladesh

Chile

Costa Rica

Estonia

Finland

France

Ireland

Kuwait

Belgium

Chile

Iraq

Mozambique

Luxembourg

New Zealand

Norway

Saudi Arabia

Singapore

South Africa

Thailand

UAE

United Kingdom

Republic of Korea

Sri Lanka

United States

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP 14

PARTNERS THAT INVEST IN UNDPrsquoS CORE FUNDING

JOIN FORCES WITH A LEADING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION AND ENSURE GLOBAL IMPACT

bull UNDP offers 50 years of experience in sustainable development and remains the partner of choice for governments and other actors across the globe to eradicate poverty and reduce inequalities and exclusion

bull Core resources enable UNDP to provide the international community with the most extensive field-based presence of the multilateral system to help countries deliver on internationally agreed development goals UNDPrsquos global reach represents the most cost-effective and strategic complement to bilateral cooperation

PROMOTE COHERENCE OF THE UN DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS AND TRANSPARENCY

bull Core resources form the bedrock of the UN Resident Coordinator system at country levelmdashmanaged and principally funded by UNDPmdash which brings together all UN development agencies for maximum impact This is crucial for UN country teamsrsquo support to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals

bull Core funds support the high standards of efficiency quality assurance and transparency UNDP has attained The new organizational structure is leaner by 10 overall and by 30 in New York allowing us to operate more effectively at the country level Tighter standards for project quality were introduced integrating UNDPrsquos new social and environmental standards In 2014 UNDP ranked as the most transparent organization in the world on the International Aid Transparency Index

SUPPORT THE MOST VULNERABLE PROMOTE EQUITY AND ENABLE PROMPT RESPONSE TO CRISIS

bull Core funds are the pillar of our support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 UNDP allocated 90 of core programme resources to Low Income Countries (LICs) and 74 to Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Although only 10 of UNDPrsquos core programme resources went to Middle Income Countries (MICs) for every $1 of core resources invested in MICs UNDP leveraged $25 in other resources

bull UNDPrsquos core funds enable us to respond quickly and flexibly to crises The UN Secretary-General has tasked UNDP with leading the UN systemrsquos support for economic recovery from the Ebola crisis In 2014 UNDP allocated $545 million of core funds for the immediate Ebola response and helped pay 100 for response workers in affected countries to ensure uninterrupted health services case tracing and safe burials

WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL OTHER RESOURCES 15

OTHER RESOURCESOther resources range from lightly earmarked funds such as in the case of thematic funds to funds highly earmarked to specific programmes and projects Funds can be earmarked at the global regional country and most commonly project levels UN pooled funds and vertical funds are also earmarked for specific purposes

Funds earmarked to specific programmes and projects are received by UNDP either through a co-financing modality called ldquocost-sharingrdquo or in the form of trust funds The table below shows the top government contributors to other resources in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Chile

Uruguay

Armenia

China

Panama

Turkey

Republic of Korea

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Canada

Finland

Australia

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Denmark

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Switzerland

Brazil

Netherlands

Sweden

Peru

Norway

United Kingdom

Germany

Argentina

Japan

United States $4179M

$3046M

$1981M

$1252M

$927M

$910M

$885M

$875M

$675M

$613M

$552M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$353M

$352M

$296M

$250M

$230M

$229M

$217M

$209M

$202M

$185M

$183M

$151M

$143M

$136M

$130M

$123M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL DOMESTIC RESOURCES 16

DOMESTIC RESOURCESDomestic resources are funds earmarked to programmes and projects They are contributions channelled through UNDP by governments from their domestic resources through a modality known as ldquogovernment cost-sharingrdquo

The chart below ranks countriesrsquo domestic contributions through government cost-sharing (GCS) in terms of volume It does not reflect the relative importance of GCS to these countries as a proportion of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Some countries contribute a greater percentage of their GDPs towards GCS even if the volume of their contributions is smaller

For example Sao Tome and Principe contributed approximately 017 of its GDP towards GCS Similarly Guinea-Bis-sau Timor-Leste Benin and Chad contributed 009 006 005 and 005 respectively of their GDP towards GCS With a total of $851 million contributed in 2014 an increasing number of programme countries like Senegal are channelling their domestic resources towards a UNDP programme or project in support of their national priorities

0 $50M $100M $150M $200M

Equatorial Guinea

Kazakhstan

Macedonia former Yugoslav Rep

Guatemala

Serbia

Guyana

Azerbaijan

Honduras

Chad

Mexico

United Republic of Tanzania

Nigeria

India

Turkey

Morocco

Chile

China

Uruguay

Dominican Republic

Armenia

Panama

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Colombia

Egypt

Venezuela

Brazil

Peru

Argentina $1978M

$852M

$601M

$532M

$476M

$441M

$350M

$296M

$217M

$213M

$162M

$151M

$136M

$122M

$121M

$120M

$113M

$104M

$102M

$90M

$87M

$76M

$76M

$67M

$66M

$63M

$63M

$62M

$57M

$48M

$44M

$43M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL SENEGAL INVESTS USD 198 MILLION TO BOOST RURAL DEVELOPMENT 17

Senegal invests USD 198 million to boost rural developmentSenegal has initiated a vast local development programme to increase living standards across the countryside while at the same time stimulating the national economy

The initiative to be implemented by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) will accelerate the construction of roads and water points invest in agriculture and entrepreneurship and facilitate peoplersquos access to energy services

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 18

THEMATIC FUNDS

With thematic funds partners channel their contributions to support activities on a particular theme UNDP has thematic funds for Crisis Prevention and Recovery Environment Democratic Governance Poverty Reduction Gender and Information Communication and Technology In 2014 contributions to thematic funds were $119 million or 3 of total contributions

0

$30M

$60M

$90M

$120M

$150M

Poverty Reduction

Information Communication and Technology

Gender

Environment

Democratic Governance

Crisis Prevention and Recovery

20142013201220112010

THEMATIC TRUST FUND CONTRIBUTIONS 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 19

TOP CONTRIBUTORS TO THEMATIC FUNDS

NEW THEMATIC WINDOWS

UNDP is streamlining its thematic funding ldquowindowsrdquo to better respond to countriesrsquo needs and ensure that development funds are utilized more effectively and efficiently through improved management arrangements and results reporting

The new thematic windows to be operational in 2016 are in line with the objectives of the Strategic Plan and provide a vehicle for minimally earmarked contributions to be allocated to address priority needs and deliver quality results

GOVERNANCE AND PEACEBUILDING

bull Democratic Governancebull Conict Preventionbull HIVHealth and Development

POVERTY ERADICATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

bull Environment Mainstreamingbull Gender Empowerment and Equality

CLIMATE CHANGE AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION

bull Climate Changebull Disaster Risk Reduction

CRISIS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

bull Immediate Response to Crisisbull Crisis Recovery

INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING

0 $5M $10M $15M $20M $25M $30M

United States

Australia

Finland

Luxembourg

Sweden

Switzerland

Denmark

Norway

United Kingdom

Netherlands

Germany $291M

$244M

$148M

$119M

$79M

$63M

$62M

$45M

$42M

$36M

$18M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 20

VERTICAL FUNDS

Vertical funds are created in response to single-issue advocacy campaigns and to tackle specific development issues They are governed by Steering Committees which decide on funding portfolios and allocation criteria and are assisted by independent Secretariats

Of the vertical funds UNDP engages with the Global Fund is the largest followed by the Global Environmental Facility and the Montreal Protocol

GLOBAL FUND

UNDP has partnered with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria since 2003 supporting pro-grammes in countries with limited ability to receive and manage this kind of fund

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY

As a Global Environmental Facility (GEF) implementing agency since 1992 UNDP supports countries to secure GEF resources and to meet global environmental obligations UNDP offers integrated technical services for countries including assistance on eligibility assessment programme formulation mobilization of co-financing implementation oversight and knowledge and results management

MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL

UNDP as an implementing agency of the Multilateral Fund supports investment projects demonstration projects that test approaches to development challenges and provides technical assistance and feasibility studies

Montreal Protocol($25M)

Global Fund($412M)

GEF($301M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 21

GREEN CLIMATE FUND

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a new fund created under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) aimed at combatting urgent and serious effects of climate change It is designed to support developing countries move towards low-emission and climate-resilient development

The GCF Board has approved UNDP as the first UN agency that will be able to access the Fundrsquos resources for devel-oping countries alongside six other entities from the public and private sector

The accreditation by GCF is a significant step allowing UNDP to continue its leadership role in scaling up climate change mitigation and adaptation for sustainable development

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 22

UN POOLED FUNDS

Pooled fundingmdashmulti-donor trust funds (MDTFs) and joint programmesmdashis a mechanism for combining resources from multiple development partners and allocating such resources to multiple implementing entities to support specific national regional or global priorities

UNDP hosts the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO) established in 2003 to facilitate coordinated action through-out the UN system It achieves this in part by designing and administering pooled financing instruments that are efficient accountable and transparent As the appointed fund administrator administrative agent the MPTFO helps design funds and channel contributions from a large number of contributors

EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT POOLED FUND FUNCTIONS AND ADDED VALUE

MAIN FUNCTION OF THE FUND MAIN ADDED VALUE OF THE FUND

COHERENCEFills critical gaps and under-financed priorities to ensure a coherent and sequenced response in line with a strategic framework

CONSOLIDATIONReduces fragmentation with respect to particular priorities In many cases is the largest investment vehicle

SPECIALIZED OR THEMATIC

Has a specific expertise and focus on a particular thematic issue Usually the case for global funds

RISK MANAGEMENTReduces risks to governments and financial contributors through a comprehensive risk and result-based management system

INNOVATIONProvides a mechanism for clear attribution and transparency from innovative sources of finance Can also deepen national financing systems

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

UNDP IN 2014

MEASURABLE IMPROVEMENT IN THE LIVES OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE

Core resources enable UNDP to carry out its Strategic Plan maximize value from other forms of financing and achieve development results In 2014 UNDP projects led to

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PATHWAYS

bull 112 million people (57 million women) benefiting from improved livelihoods in 94 countries

bull 920000 new jobs (41 for women) created in 77 countries

bull 33 countries adopting policies and systems to boost employment and livelihoods

bull Technology support in 48 countries to phase out gases that destroy the ozone layer

bull 40 countries implementing or completing MDG acceleration framework action plans

bull 39 countries implementing measures towards low-emission and climate-resilient development objectives

INCLUSIVE AND EFFECTIVE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE

bull Over 18 million new voters registered in 21 countries including nearly 4 million in Afghanistan where one million more women registered than in 2009

bull 750000 people (51 women) in 22 countries gaining access to legal aid services

bull 14 million people receiving antiretroviral treatment in 20 countries

bull 22 million people receiving HIV-related behavioural change communication in 20 countries

bull Over 7 million people (49 women) expressing their vision for the future through the UNDP hosted lsquoMy Worldrsquo global survey the largest crowd-sourcing exercise in United Nations history

RESILIENCE BUILDING

bull 98 new disaster reduction and adaptation plans in place in 23 countries

bull 21 countries with enforceable lawsregulations to address disaster and climate risks

bull 13 million people achieving better access to energy in 26 countries

bull 158 new early warning systems in 17 countries

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The present Compendium gives an overview of UNDPrsquos funding resources

1 The first chapter shows resources by funding typemdashregular resources also referred to as core and other resourcesmdashas well as funding trends over the past five years

2 The second chapter explains how UNDP receives contributions from its partners

a Regular or ldquocorerdquo resources with a list of UNDPrsquos top contributors in 2014 and contribution trends over the past five years

b Funds earmarked to programmes and projects

c Thematic funding including the importance of flexible funding and total contributions received by UNDP for Thematic Trust Funds since 2010

d Vertical funds mainly with the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility

e UN pooled funds featuring UNDPrsquos role as Administrative Agent for Multi-Donor Trust Funds and Joint Programmes in the UN system and the share of pooled funds UNDP implements as a participating organization

3 The third chapter shows funding by partnermdashsuch as governments multi-lateral organizations and UN entities

All funding channels are important for UNDP to mobilize the resources required to deliver on our Strategic Plan But core funds by virtue of not being earmarked are the most adaptable in addressing the priorities outlined in the Plan

RESOURCES BY FUNDING TYPE 6

RESOURCES BY

FUNDING TYPE

RESOURCES BY FUNDING TYPE 7

Over the past five years there has been a decline in the amount of core resource contributions to UNDP an increase in highly earmarked contributions and a growing imbalance between core and other resources

COREOTHER RESOURCES TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING TYPE

In 2014 overall contributions to UNDP amounted to $4715 billion decreasing by 3 compared to $484 billion in 2013 Core resources (comprising 17 of total contributions) decreased by 11 to $793 million from $896 million in 2013 due to reduced contributions from partners currency fluctuations and non-receipt of contributions intended for 2014 Other resources received amounted to $3922 billion falling by 1 from $3944 billion in 2013

1 This figure excludes cash and in-kind contributions towards Government Local Office Costs (GLOC)

Other Resources($392B)

Regular Resources($793M)17

83

0

$1B

$2B

$3B

$4B

$5B

$6B

20142013201220112010

($4715B)($4840B)($4826B)($5055B)

($5277B)

Other ResourcesRegular Resources Total

82($4310B)

18($967M)

81($4080B)

19($975M)

82($3980B)

18($846M)

81($3944B)

19($896M)

83($3922B)

17($793M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 8

RESOURCES BY

FUNDING CHANNEL

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 9

With total resources in the range of $5 billion annually and programmes in 177 countries and territories contributions to UNDP are channelled through any of the following modalities 1) voluntary contributions to core resources 2) funds intended for specific thematic areas 3) funds earmarked to programmes and projects including government domestic resources 4) UN pooled funds or 5) funds confined to a single development domain or vertical funds

The illustration below shows the range of the flexibility of resources offered by the different funding channels Core resources offer the most flexibility while vertical funds offer the least

MORE FLEXIBLE FUNDING LESS FLEXIBLE FUNDING

CORE

The bedrock of the Organization for its

exibility

THEMATIC FUNDING

Lightly earmarked funding that allows the Organization to allocate funds to programmes

and projects in accordance with needs

and in line with the Strategic Plan

FUNDING EARMARKED TO PROGRAMMES OR

PROJECTS

Bilateral andmultilateral

contributions including domestic ressources from

programme countries

UN POOLED FUNDS

Funds from multiple partners allocated to

multiple implementing entities to support

specic national regional or global priorities

Multi-Donor Trust Funds and Joint Programmes

are the main mechanisms used by the UN system

VERTICAL FUNDS

Funds intended for a specic development

area (eg health climate change etc) approved for projects through a

call-for-proposals process

The largest share of contributions received by UNDP in 2014 was from bilateral and multilateral funds (58) of which 19 are domestic resources invested by programme countries Core resources (17) was the second largest followed by vertical funds (15) UN pooled funds (6) thematic funds (3) and Government Local Office Costs or GLOC (1)

UN Pooled funds(6)

Bilateral and multilateral funds(58)

(Domestic resources)(19)

Vertical funds(15)

Core resources(17)

GLOC(1)

Thematic funds(3)

FUNDING BY CHANNEL 2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 10

FUNDING BY CHANNEL 2009-2014

Since 2009 funds earmarked to programmes and projects have remained the biggest source of funding for UNDP

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

Thematic Funds

UN Pooled Funds

Vertical Funds

Core

Domestic Resources

Funds earmarked to programmes and projects

201420132012201120102009

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 11

CORE RESOURCES

Core resources form the bedrock of UNDP and hence are the bedrock of support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 56 partners contributed $793 million to core OECDDAC members contributed 975 of total core contribu-tions with the top 15 accounting for 96 of the total A total of $1927 million was received from non-DAC members

CORE CONTRIBUTIONS 2014

Africa2 Countries ($011M)

Other States1 Country ($010M)

Latin America and the Caribbean5 Countries ($055M)

Arab States7 Countries ($358M)

Europe and the CIS5 Countries ($428M)

Asia and the Pacic14 Countries ($1123M)

Non-DAC Members(25)

DAC Members(975)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 12

TOP 30 CONTRIBUTORS TO CORE RESOURCES

Contributions for 2014 from Canada and India were received in 2015 Contribution from Australia excludes amount intended for 2013 and received in 2014

0 $20M $40M $60M $80M $100M $120M

United Arab Emirates

Bangladesh

Iraq

Kuwait

Thailand

Russian Federation

Saudi Arabia

Austria

Turkey

Luxembourg

China

India

Italy

Korea Republic of

New Zealand

Ireland

Australia

France

Belgium

Germany

Finland

Canada

Netherlands

Denmark

Switzerland

Sweden

Japan

United States of America

United Kingdom

Norway $1122M

$903M

$810M

$805M

$729M

$635M

$601M

$368M

$356M

$303M

$291M

$237M

$186M

$181M

$117M

$66M

$64M

$44M

$43M

$38M

$36M

$30M

$21M

$20M

$11M

$09M

$06M

$05M

$04M

$03M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 13

PARTNERS THAT INCREASED THEIR CORE CONTRIBUTION IN 2014

PARTNERS THAT MADE EARLY PAYMENTS IN 2013 AND 2014

Austria

Bangladesh

Chile

Costa Rica

Estonia

Finland

France

Ireland

Kuwait

Belgium

Chile

Iraq

Mozambique

Luxembourg

New Zealand

Norway

Saudi Arabia

Singapore

South Africa

Thailand

UAE

United Kingdom

Republic of Korea

Sri Lanka

United States

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP 14

PARTNERS THAT INVEST IN UNDPrsquoS CORE FUNDING

JOIN FORCES WITH A LEADING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION AND ENSURE GLOBAL IMPACT

bull UNDP offers 50 years of experience in sustainable development and remains the partner of choice for governments and other actors across the globe to eradicate poverty and reduce inequalities and exclusion

bull Core resources enable UNDP to provide the international community with the most extensive field-based presence of the multilateral system to help countries deliver on internationally agreed development goals UNDPrsquos global reach represents the most cost-effective and strategic complement to bilateral cooperation

PROMOTE COHERENCE OF THE UN DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS AND TRANSPARENCY

bull Core resources form the bedrock of the UN Resident Coordinator system at country levelmdashmanaged and principally funded by UNDPmdash which brings together all UN development agencies for maximum impact This is crucial for UN country teamsrsquo support to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals

bull Core funds support the high standards of efficiency quality assurance and transparency UNDP has attained The new organizational structure is leaner by 10 overall and by 30 in New York allowing us to operate more effectively at the country level Tighter standards for project quality were introduced integrating UNDPrsquos new social and environmental standards In 2014 UNDP ranked as the most transparent organization in the world on the International Aid Transparency Index

SUPPORT THE MOST VULNERABLE PROMOTE EQUITY AND ENABLE PROMPT RESPONSE TO CRISIS

bull Core funds are the pillar of our support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 UNDP allocated 90 of core programme resources to Low Income Countries (LICs) and 74 to Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Although only 10 of UNDPrsquos core programme resources went to Middle Income Countries (MICs) for every $1 of core resources invested in MICs UNDP leveraged $25 in other resources

bull UNDPrsquos core funds enable us to respond quickly and flexibly to crises The UN Secretary-General has tasked UNDP with leading the UN systemrsquos support for economic recovery from the Ebola crisis In 2014 UNDP allocated $545 million of core funds for the immediate Ebola response and helped pay 100 for response workers in affected countries to ensure uninterrupted health services case tracing and safe burials

WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL OTHER RESOURCES 15

OTHER RESOURCESOther resources range from lightly earmarked funds such as in the case of thematic funds to funds highly earmarked to specific programmes and projects Funds can be earmarked at the global regional country and most commonly project levels UN pooled funds and vertical funds are also earmarked for specific purposes

Funds earmarked to specific programmes and projects are received by UNDP either through a co-financing modality called ldquocost-sharingrdquo or in the form of trust funds The table below shows the top government contributors to other resources in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Chile

Uruguay

Armenia

China

Panama

Turkey

Republic of Korea

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Canada

Finland

Australia

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Denmark

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Switzerland

Brazil

Netherlands

Sweden

Peru

Norway

United Kingdom

Germany

Argentina

Japan

United States $4179M

$3046M

$1981M

$1252M

$927M

$910M

$885M

$875M

$675M

$613M

$552M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$353M

$352M

$296M

$250M

$230M

$229M

$217M

$209M

$202M

$185M

$183M

$151M

$143M

$136M

$130M

$123M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL DOMESTIC RESOURCES 16

DOMESTIC RESOURCESDomestic resources are funds earmarked to programmes and projects They are contributions channelled through UNDP by governments from their domestic resources through a modality known as ldquogovernment cost-sharingrdquo

The chart below ranks countriesrsquo domestic contributions through government cost-sharing (GCS) in terms of volume It does not reflect the relative importance of GCS to these countries as a proportion of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Some countries contribute a greater percentage of their GDPs towards GCS even if the volume of their contributions is smaller

For example Sao Tome and Principe contributed approximately 017 of its GDP towards GCS Similarly Guinea-Bis-sau Timor-Leste Benin and Chad contributed 009 006 005 and 005 respectively of their GDP towards GCS With a total of $851 million contributed in 2014 an increasing number of programme countries like Senegal are channelling their domestic resources towards a UNDP programme or project in support of their national priorities

0 $50M $100M $150M $200M

Equatorial Guinea

Kazakhstan

Macedonia former Yugoslav Rep

Guatemala

Serbia

Guyana

Azerbaijan

Honduras

Chad

Mexico

United Republic of Tanzania

Nigeria

India

Turkey

Morocco

Chile

China

Uruguay

Dominican Republic

Armenia

Panama

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Colombia

Egypt

Venezuela

Brazil

Peru

Argentina $1978M

$852M

$601M

$532M

$476M

$441M

$350M

$296M

$217M

$213M

$162M

$151M

$136M

$122M

$121M

$120M

$113M

$104M

$102M

$90M

$87M

$76M

$76M

$67M

$66M

$63M

$63M

$62M

$57M

$48M

$44M

$43M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL SENEGAL INVESTS USD 198 MILLION TO BOOST RURAL DEVELOPMENT 17

Senegal invests USD 198 million to boost rural developmentSenegal has initiated a vast local development programme to increase living standards across the countryside while at the same time stimulating the national economy

The initiative to be implemented by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) will accelerate the construction of roads and water points invest in agriculture and entrepreneurship and facilitate peoplersquos access to energy services

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 18

THEMATIC FUNDS

With thematic funds partners channel their contributions to support activities on a particular theme UNDP has thematic funds for Crisis Prevention and Recovery Environment Democratic Governance Poverty Reduction Gender and Information Communication and Technology In 2014 contributions to thematic funds were $119 million or 3 of total contributions

0

$30M

$60M

$90M

$120M

$150M

Poverty Reduction

Information Communication and Technology

Gender

Environment

Democratic Governance

Crisis Prevention and Recovery

20142013201220112010

THEMATIC TRUST FUND CONTRIBUTIONS 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 19

TOP CONTRIBUTORS TO THEMATIC FUNDS

NEW THEMATIC WINDOWS

UNDP is streamlining its thematic funding ldquowindowsrdquo to better respond to countriesrsquo needs and ensure that development funds are utilized more effectively and efficiently through improved management arrangements and results reporting

The new thematic windows to be operational in 2016 are in line with the objectives of the Strategic Plan and provide a vehicle for minimally earmarked contributions to be allocated to address priority needs and deliver quality results

GOVERNANCE AND PEACEBUILDING

bull Democratic Governancebull Conict Preventionbull HIVHealth and Development

POVERTY ERADICATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

bull Environment Mainstreamingbull Gender Empowerment and Equality

CLIMATE CHANGE AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION

bull Climate Changebull Disaster Risk Reduction

CRISIS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

bull Immediate Response to Crisisbull Crisis Recovery

INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING

0 $5M $10M $15M $20M $25M $30M

United States

Australia

Finland

Luxembourg

Sweden

Switzerland

Denmark

Norway

United Kingdom

Netherlands

Germany $291M

$244M

$148M

$119M

$79M

$63M

$62M

$45M

$42M

$36M

$18M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 20

VERTICAL FUNDS

Vertical funds are created in response to single-issue advocacy campaigns and to tackle specific development issues They are governed by Steering Committees which decide on funding portfolios and allocation criteria and are assisted by independent Secretariats

Of the vertical funds UNDP engages with the Global Fund is the largest followed by the Global Environmental Facility and the Montreal Protocol

GLOBAL FUND

UNDP has partnered with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria since 2003 supporting pro-grammes in countries with limited ability to receive and manage this kind of fund

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY

As a Global Environmental Facility (GEF) implementing agency since 1992 UNDP supports countries to secure GEF resources and to meet global environmental obligations UNDP offers integrated technical services for countries including assistance on eligibility assessment programme formulation mobilization of co-financing implementation oversight and knowledge and results management

MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL

UNDP as an implementing agency of the Multilateral Fund supports investment projects demonstration projects that test approaches to development challenges and provides technical assistance and feasibility studies

Montreal Protocol($25M)

Global Fund($412M)

GEF($301M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 21

GREEN CLIMATE FUND

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a new fund created under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) aimed at combatting urgent and serious effects of climate change It is designed to support developing countries move towards low-emission and climate-resilient development

The GCF Board has approved UNDP as the first UN agency that will be able to access the Fundrsquos resources for devel-oping countries alongside six other entities from the public and private sector

The accreditation by GCF is a significant step allowing UNDP to continue its leadership role in scaling up climate change mitigation and adaptation for sustainable development

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 22

UN POOLED FUNDS

Pooled fundingmdashmulti-donor trust funds (MDTFs) and joint programmesmdashis a mechanism for combining resources from multiple development partners and allocating such resources to multiple implementing entities to support specific national regional or global priorities

UNDP hosts the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO) established in 2003 to facilitate coordinated action through-out the UN system It achieves this in part by designing and administering pooled financing instruments that are efficient accountable and transparent As the appointed fund administrator administrative agent the MPTFO helps design funds and channel contributions from a large number of contributors

EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT POOLED FUND FUNCTIONS AND ADDED VALUE

MAIN FUNCTION OF THE FUND MAIN ADDED VALUE OF THE FUND

COHERENCEFills critical gaps and under-financed priorities to ensure a coherent and sequenced response in line with a strategic framework

CONSOLIDATIONReduces fragmentation with respect to particular priorities In many cases is the largest investment vehicle

SPECIALIZED OR THEMATIC

Has a specific expertise and focus on a particular thematic issue Usually the case for global funds

RISK MANAGEMENTReduces risks to governments and financial contributors through a comprehensive risk and result-based management system

INNOVATIONProvides a mechanism for clear attribution and transparency from innovative sources of finance Can also deepen national financing systems

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The present Compendium gives an overview of UNDPrsquos funding resources

1 The first chapter shows resources by funding typemdashregular resources also referred to as core and other resourcesmdashas well as funding trends over the past five years

2 The second chapter explains how UNDP receives contributions from its partners

a Regular or ldquocorerdquo resources with a list of UNDPrsquos top contributors in 2014 and contribution trends over the past five years

b Funds earmarked to programmes and projects

c Thematic funding including the importance of flexible funding and total contributions received by UNDP for Thematic Trust Funds since 2010

d Vertical funds mainly with the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility

e UN pooled funds featuring UNDPrsquos role as Administrative Agent for Multi-Donor Trust Funds and Joint Programmes in the UN system and the share of pooled funds UNDP implements as a participating organization

3 The third chapter shows funding by partnermdashsuch as governments multi-lateral organizations and UN entities

All funding channels are important for UNDP to mobilize the resources required to deliver on our Strategic Plan But core funds by virtue of not being earmarked are the most adaptable in addressing the priorities outlined in the Plan

RESOURCES BY FUNDING TYPE 6

RESOURCES BY

FUNDING TYPE

RESOURCES BY FUNDING TYPE 7

Over the past five years there has been a decline in the amount of core resource contributions to UNDP an increase in highly earmarked contributions and a growing imbalance between core and other resources

COREOTHER RESOURCES TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING TYPE

In 2014 overall contributions to UNDP amounted to $4715 billion decreasing by 3 compared to $484 billion in 2013 Core resources (comprising 17 of total contributions) decreased by 11 to $793 million from $896 million in 2013 due to reduced contributions from partners currency fluctuations and non-receipt of contributions intended for 2014 Other resources received amounted to $3922 billion falling by 1 from $3944 billion in 2013

1 This figure excludes cash and in-kind contributions towards Government Local Office Costs (GLOC)

Other Resources($392B)

Regular Resources($793M)17

83

0

$1B

$2B

$3B

$4B

$5B

$6B

20142013201220112010

($4715B)($4840B)($4826B)($5055B)

($5277B)

Other ResourcesRegular Resources Total

82($4310B)

18($967M)

81($4080B)

19($975M)

82($3980B)

18($846M)

81($3944B)

19($896M)

83($3922B)

17($793M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 8

RESOURCES BY

FUNDING CHANNEL

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 9

With total resources in the range of $5 billion annually and programmes in 177 countries and territories contributions to UNDP are channelled through any of the following modalities 1) voluntary contributions to core resources 2) funds intended for specific thematic areas 3) funds earmarked to programmes and projects including government domestic resources 4) UN pooled funds or 5) funds confined to a single development domain or vertical funds

The illustration below shows the range of the flexibility of resources offered by the different funding channels Core resources offer the most flexibility while vertical funds offer the least

MORE FLEXIBLE FUNDING LESS FLEXIBLE FUNDING

CORE

The bedrock of the Organization for its

exibility

THEMATIC FUNDING

Lightly earmarked funding that allows the Organization to allocate funds to programmes

and projects in accordance with needs

and in line with the Strategic Plan

FUNDING EARMARKED TO PROGRAMMES OR

PROJECTS

Bilateral andmultilateral

contributions including domestic ressources from

programme countries

UN POOLED FUNDS

Funds from multiple partners allocated to

multiple implementing entities to support

specic national regional or global priorities

Multi-Donor Trust Funds and Joint Programmes

are the main mechanisms used by the UN system

VERTICAL FUNDS

Funds intended for a specic development

area (eg health climate change etc) approved for projects through a

call-for-proposals process

The largest share of contributions received by UNDP in 2014 was from bilateral and multilateral funds (58) of which 19 are domestic resources invested by programme countries Core resources (17) was the second largest followed by vertical funds (15) UN pooled funds (6) thematic funds (3) and Government Local Office Costs or GLOC (1)

UN Pooled funds(6)

Bilateral and multilateral funds(58)

(Domestic resources)(19)

Vertical funds(15)

Core resources(17)

GLOC(1)

Thematic funds(3)

FUNDING BY CHANNEL 2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 10

FUNDING BY CHANNEL 2009-2014

Since 2009 funds earmarked to programmes and projects have remained the biggest source of funding for UNDP

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

Thematic Funds

UN Pooled Funds

Vertical Funds

Core

Domestic Resources

Funds earmarked to programmes and projects

201420132012201120102009

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 11

CORE RESOURCES

Core resources form the bedrock of UNDP and hence are the bedrock of support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 56 partners contributed $793 million to core OECDDAC members contributed 975 of total core contribu-tions with the top 15 accounting for 96 of the total A total of $1927 million was received from non-DAC members

CORE CONTRIBUTIONS 2014

Africa2 Countries ($011M)

Other States1 Country ($010M)

Latin America and the Caribbean5 Countries ($055M)

Arab States7 Countries ($358M)

Europe and the CIS5 Countries ($428M)

Asia and the Pacic14 Countries ($1123M)

Non-DAC Members(25)

DAC Members(975)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 12

TOP 30 CONTRIBUTORS TO CORE RESOURCES

Contributions for 2014 from Canada and India were received in 2015 Contribution from Australia excludes amount intended for 2013 and received in 2014

0 $20M $40M $60M $80M $100M $120M

United Arab Emirates

Bangladesh

Iraq

Kuwait

Thailand

Russian Federation

Saudi Arabia

Austria

Turkey

Luxembourg

China

India

Italy

Korea Republic of

New Zealand

Ireland

Australia

France

Belgium

Germany

Finland

Canada

Netherlands

Denmark

Switzerland

Sweden

Japan

United States of America

United Kingdom

Norway $1122M

$903M

$810M

$805M

$729M

$635M

$601M

$368M

$356M

$303M

$291M

$237M

$186M

$181M

$117M

$66M

$64M

$44M

$43M

$38M

$36M

$30M

$21M

$20M

$11M

$09M

$06M

$05M

$04M

$03M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 13

PARTNERS THAT INCREASED THEIR CORE CONTRIBUTION IN 2014

PARTNERS THAT MADE EARLY PAYMENTS IN 2013 AND 2014

Austria

Bangladesh

Chile

Costa Rica

Estonia

Finland

France

Ireland

Kuwait

Belgium

Chile

Iraq

Mozambique

Luxembourg

New Zealand

Norway

Saudi Arabia

Singapore

South Africa

Thailand

UAE

United Kingdom

Republic of Korea

Sri Lanka

United States

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP 14

PARTNERS THAT INVEST IN UNDPrsquoS CORE FUNDING

JOIN FORCES WITH A LEADING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION AND ENSURE GLOBAL IMPACT

bull UNDP offers 50 years of experience in sustainable development and remains the partner of choice for governments and other actors across the globe to eradicate poverty and reduce inequalities and exclusion

bull Core resources enable UNDP to provide the international community with the most extensive field-based presence of the multilateral system to help countries deliver on internationally agreed development goals UNDPrsquos global reach represents the most cost-effective and strategic complement to bilateral cooperation

PROMOTE COHERENCE OF THE UN DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS AND TRANSPARENCY

bull Core resources form the bedrock of the UN Resident Coordinator system at country levelmdashmanaged and principally funded by UNDPmdash which brings together all UN development agencies for maximum impact This is crucial for UN country teamsrsquo support to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals

bull Core funds support the high standards of efficiency quality assurance and transparency UNDP has attained The new organizational structure is leaner by 10 overall and by 30 in New York allowing us to operate more effectively at the country level Tighter standards for project quality were introduced integrating UNDPrsquos new social and environmental standards In 2014 UNDP ranked as the most transparent organization in the world on the International Aid Transparency Index

SUPPORT THE MOST VULNERABLE PROMOTE EQUITY AND ENABLE PROMPT RESPONSE TO CRISIS

bull Core funds are the pillar of our support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 UNDP allocated 90 of core programme resources to Low Income Countries (LICs) and 74 to Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Although only 10 of UNDPrsquos core programme resources went to Middle Income Countries (MICs) for every $1 of core resources invested in MICs UNDP leveraged $25 in other resources

bull UNDPrsquos core funds enable us to respond quickly and flexibly to crises The UN Secretary-General has tasked UNDP with leading the UN systemrsquos support for economic recovery from the Ebola crisis In 2014 UNDP allocated $545 million of core funds for the immediate Ebola response and helped pay 100 for response workers in affected countries to ensure uninterrupted health services case tracing and safe burials

WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL OTHER RESOURCES 15

OTHER RESOURCESOther resources range from lightly earmarked funds such as in the case of thematic funds to funds highly earmarked to specific programmes and projects Funds can be earmarked at the global regional country and most commonly project levels UN pooled funds and vertical funds are also earmarked for specific purposes

Funds earmarked to specific programmes and projects are received by UNDP either through a co-financing modality called ldquocost-sharingrdquo or in the form of trust funds The table below shows the top government contributors to other resources in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Chile

Uruguay

Armenia

China

Panama

Turkey

Republic of Korea

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Canada

Finland

Australia

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Denmark

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Switzerland

Brazil

Netherlands

Sweden

Peru

Norway

United Kingdom

Germany

Argentina

Japan

United States $4179M

$3046M

$1981M

$1252M

$927M

$910M

$885M

$875M

$675M

$613M

$552M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$353M

$352M

$296M

$250M

$230M

$229M

$217M

$209M

$202M

$185M

$183M

$151M

$143M

$136M

$130M

$123M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL DOMESTIC RESOURCES 16

DOMESTIC RESOURCESDomestic resources are funds earmarked to programmes and projects They are contributions channelled through UNDP by governments from their domestic resources through a modality known as ldquogovernment cost-sharingrdquo

The chart below ranks countriesrsquo domestic contributions through government cost-sharing (GCS) in terms of volume It does not reflect the relative importance of GCS to these countries as a proportion of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Some countries contribute a greater percentage of their GDPs towards GCS even if the volume of their contributions is smaller

For example Sao Tome and Principe contributed approximately 017 of its GDP towards GCS Similarly Guinea-Bis-sau Timor-Leste Benin and Chad contributed 009 006 005 and 005 respectively of their GDP towards GCS With a total of $851 million contributed in 2014 an increasing number of programme countries like Senegal are channelling their domestic resources towards a UNDP programme or project in support of their national priorities

0 $50M $100M $150M $200M

Equatorial Guinea

Kazakhstan

Macedonia former Yugoslav Rep

Guatemala

Serbia

Guyana

Azerbaijan

Honduras

Chad

Mexico

United Republic of Tanzania

Nigeria

India

Turkey

Morocco

Chile

China

Uruguay

Dominican Republic

Armenia

Panama

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Colombia

Egypt

Venezuela

Brazil

Peru

Argentina $1978M

$852M

$601M

$532M

$476M

$441M

$350M

$296M

$217M

$213M

$162M

$151M

$136M

$122M

$121M

$120M

$113M

$104M

$102M

$90M

$87M

$76M

$76M

$67M

$66M

$63M

$63M

$62M

$57M

$48M

$44M

$43M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL SENEGAL INVESTS USD 198 MILLION TO BOOST RURAL DEVELOPMENT 17

Senegal invests USD 198 million to boost rural developmentSenegal has initiated a vast local development programme to increase living standards across the countryside while at the same time stimulating the national economy

The initiative to be implemented by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) will accelerate the construction of roads and water points invest in agriculture and entrepreneurship and facilitate peoplersquos access to energy services

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 18

THEMATIC FUNDS

With thematic funds partners channel their contributions to support activities on a particular theme UNDP has thematic funds for Crisis Prevention and Recovery Environment Democratic Governance Poverty Reduction Gender and Information Communication and Technology In 2014 contributions to thematic funds were $119 million or 3 of total contributions

0

$30M

$60M

$90M

$120M

$150M

Poverty Reduction

Information Communication and Technology

Gender

Environment

Democratic Governance

Crisis Prevention and Recovery

20142013201220112010

THEMATIC TRUST FUND CONTRIBUTIONS 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 19

TOP CONTRIBUTORS TO THEMATIC FUNDS

NEW THEMATIC WINDOWS

UNDP is streamlining its thematic funding ldquowindowsrdquo to better respond to countriesrsquo needs and ensure that development funds are utilized more effectively and efficiently through improved management arrangements and results reporting

The new thematic windows to be operational in 2016 are in line with the objectives of the Strategic Plan and provide a vehicle for minimally earmarked contributions to be allocated to address priority needs and deliver quality results

GOVERNANCE AND PEACEBUILDING

bull Democratic Governancebull Conict Preventionbull HIVHealth and Development

POVERTY ERADICATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

bull Environment Mainstreamingbull Gender Empowerment and Equality

CLIMATE CHANGE AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION

bull Climate Changebull Disaster Risk Reduction

CRISIS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

bull Immediate Response to Crisisbull Crisis Recovery

INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING

0 $5M $10M $15M $20M $25M $30M

United States

Australia

Finland

Luxembourg

Sweden

Switzerland

Denmark

Norway

United Kingdom

Netherlands

Germany $291M

$244M

$148M

$119M

$79M

$63M

$62M

$45M

$42M

$36M

$18M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 20

VERTICAL FUNDS

Vertical funds are created in response to single-issue advocacy campaigns and to tackle specific development issues They are governed by Steering Committees which decide on funding portfolios and allocation criteria and are assisted by independent Secretariats

Of the vertical funds UNDP engages with the Global Fund is the largest followed by the Global Environmental Facility and the Montreal Protocol

GLOBAL FUND

UNDP has partnered with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria since 2003 supporting pro-grammes in countries with limited ability to receive and manage this kind of fund

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY

As a Global Environmental Facility (GEF) implementing agency since 1992 UNDP supports countries to secure GEF resources and to meet global environmental obligations UNDP offers integrated technical services for countries including assistance on eligibility assessment programme formulation mobilization of co-financing implementation oversight and knowledge and results management

MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL

UNDP as an implementing agency of the Multilateral Fund supports investment projects demonstration projects that test approaches to development challenges and provides technical assistance and feasibility studies

Montreal Protocol($25M)

Global Fund($412M)

GEF($301M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 21

GREEN CLIMATE FUND

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a new fund created under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) aimed at combatting urgent and serious effects of climate change It is designed to support developing countries move towards low-emission and climate-resilient development

The GCF Board has approved UNDP as the first UN agency that will be able to access the Fundrsquos resources for devel-oping countries alongside six other entities from the public and private sector

The accreditation by GCF is a significant step allowing UNDP to continue its leadership role in scaling up climate change mitigation and adaptation for sustainable development

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 22

UN POOLED FUNDS

Pooled fundingmdashmulti-donor trust funds (MDTFs) and joint programmesmdashis a mechanism for combining resources from multiple development partners and allocating such resources to multiple implementing entities to support specific national regional or global priorities

UNDP hosts the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO) established in 2003 to facilitate coordinated action through-out the UN system It achieves this in part by designing and administering pooled financing instruments that are efficient accountable and transparent As the appointed fund administrator administrative agent the MPTFO helps design funds and channel contributions from a large number of contributors

EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT POOLED FUND FUNCTIONS AND ADDED VALUE

MAIN FUNCTION OF THE FUND MAIN ADDED VALUE OF THE FUND

COHERENCEFills critical gaps and under-financed priorities to ensure a coherent and sequenced response in line with a strategic framework

CONSOLIDATIONReduces fragmentation with respect to particular priorities In many cases is the largest investment vehicle

SPECIALIZED OR THEMATIC

Has a specific expertise and focus on a particular thematic issue Usually the case for global funds

RISK MANAGEMENTReduces risks to governments and financial contributors through a comprehensive risk and result-based management system

INNOVATIONProvides a mechanism for clear attribution and transparency from innovative sources of finance Can also deepen national financing systems

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY FUNDING TYPE 6

RESOURCES BY

FUNDING TYPE

RESOURCES BY FUNDING TYPE 7

Over the past five years there has been a decline in the amount of core resource contributions to UNDP an increase in highly earmarked contributions and a growing imbalance between core and other resources

COREOTHER RESOURCES TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING TYPE

In 2014 overall contributions to UNDP amounted to $4715 billion decreasing by 3 compared to $484 billion in 2013 Core resources (comprising 17 of total contributions) decreased by 11 to $793 million from $896 million in 2013 due to reduced contributions from partners currency fluctuations and non-receipt of contributions intended for 2014 Other resources received amounted to $3922 billion falling by 1 from $3944 billion in 2013

1 This figure excludes cash and in-kind contributions towards Government Local Office Costs (GLOC)

Other Resources($392B)

Regular Resources($793M)17

83

0

$1B

$2B

$3B

$4B

$5B

$6B

20142013201220112010

($4715B)($4840B)($4826B)($5055B)

($5277B)

Other ResourcesRegular Resources Total

82($4310B)

18($967M)

81($4080B)

19($975M)

82($3980B)

18($846M)

81($3944B)

19($896M)

83($3922B)

17($793M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 8

RESOURCES BY

FUNDING CHANNEL

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 9

With total resources in the range of $5 billion annually and programmes in 177 countries and territories contributions to UNDP are channelled through any of the following modalities 1) voluntary contributions to core resources 2) funds intended for specific thematic areas 3) funds earmarked to programmes and projects including government domestic resources 4) UN pooled funds or 5) funds confined to a single development domain or vertical funds

The illustration below shows the range of the flexibility of resources offered by the different funding channels Core resources offer the most flexibility while vertical funds offer the least

MORE FLEXIBLE FUNDING LESS FLEXIBLE FUNDING

CORE

The bedrock of the Organization for its

exibility

THEMATIC FUNDING

Lightly earmarked funding that allows the Organization to allocate funds to programmes

and projects in accordance with needs

and in line with the Strategic Plan

FUNDING EARMARKED TO PROGRAMMES OR

PROJECTS

Bilateral andmultilateral

contributions including domestic ressources from

programme countries

UN POOLED FUNDS

Funds from multiple partners allocated to

multiple implementing entities to support

specic national regional or global priorities

Multi-Donor Trust Funds and Joint Programmes

are the main mechanisms used by the UN system

VERTICAL FUNDS

Funds intended for a specic development

area (eg health climate change etc) approved for projects through a

call-for-proposals process

The largest share of contributions received by UNDP in 2014 was from bilateral and multilateral funds (58) of which 19 are domestic resources invested by programme countries Core resources (17) was the second largest followed by vertical funds (15) UN pooled funds (6) thematic funds (3) and Government Local Office Costs or GLOC (1)

UN Pooled funds(6)

Bilateral and multilateral funds(58)

(Domestic resources)(19)

Vertical funds(15)

Core resources(17)

GLOC(1)

Thematic funds(3)

FUNDING BY CHANNEL 2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 10

FUNDING BY CHANNEL 2009-2014

Since 2009 funds earmarked to programmes and projects have remained the biggest source of funding for UNDP

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

Thematic Funds

UN Pooled Funds

Vertical Funds

Core

Domestic Resources

Funds earmarked to programmes and projects

201420132012201120102009

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 11

CORE RESOURCES

Core resources form the bedrock of UNDP and hence are the bedrock of support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 56 partners contributed $793 million to core OECDDAC members contributed 975 of total core contribu-tions with the top 15 accounting for 96 of the total A total of $1927 million was received from non-DAC members

CORE CONTRIBUTIONS 2014

Africa2 Countries ($011M)

Other States1 Country ($010M)

Latin America and the Caribbean5 Countries ($055M)

Arab States7 Countries ($358M)

Europe and the CIS5 Countries ($428M)

Asia and the Pacic14 Countries ($1123M)

Non-DAC Members(25)

DAC Members(975)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 12

TOP 30 CONTRIBUTORS TO CORE RESOURCES

Contributions for 2014 from Canada and India were received in 2015 Contribution from Australia excludes amount intended for 2013 and received in 2014

0 $20M $40M $60M $80M $100M $120M

United Arab Emirates

Bangladesh

Iraq

Kuwait

Thailand

Russian Federation

Saudi Arabia

Austria

Turkey

Luxembourg

China

India

Italy

Korea Republic of

New Zealand

Ireland

Australia

France

Belgium

Germany

Finland

Canada

Netherlands

Denmark

Switzerland

Sweden

Japan

United States of America

United Kingdom

Norway $1122M

$903M

$810M

$805M

$729M

$635M

$601M

$368M

$356M

$303M

$291M

$237M

$186M

$181M

$117M

$66M

$64M

$44M

$43M

$38M

$36M

$30M

$21M

$20M

$11M

$09M

$06M

$05M

$04M

$03M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 13

PARTNERS THAT INCREASED THEIR CORE CONTRIBUTION IN 2014

PARTNERS THAT MADE EARLY PAYMENTS IN 2013 AND 2014

Austria

Bangladesh

Chile

Costa Rica

Estonia

Finland

France

Ireland

Kuwait

Belgium

Chile

Iraq

Mozambique

Luxembourg

New Zealand

Norway

Saudi Arabia

Singapore

South Africa

Thailand

UAE

United Kingdom

Republic of Korea

Sri Lanka

United States

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP 14

PARTNERS THAT INVEST IN UNDPrsquoS CORE FUNDING

JOIN FORCES WITH A LEADING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION AND ENSURE GLOBAL IMPACT

bull UNDP offers 50 years of experience in sustainable development and remains the partner of choice for governments and other actors across the globe to eradicate poverty and reduce inequalities and exclusion

bull Core resources enable UNDP to provide the international community with the most extensive field-based presence of the multilateral system to help countries deliver on internationally agreed development goals UNDPrsquos global reach represents the most cost-effective and strategic complement to bilateral cooperation

PROMOTE COHERENCE OF THE UN DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS AND TRANSPARENCY

bull Core resources form the bedrock of the UN Resident Coordinator system at country levelmdashmanaged and principally funded by UNDPmdash which brings together all UN development agencies for maximum impact This is crucial for UN country teamsrsquo support to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals

bull Core funds support the high standards of efficiency quality assurance and transparency UNDP has attained The new organizational structure is leaner by 10 overall and by 30 in New York allowing us to operate more effectively at the country level Tighter standards for project quality were introduced integrating UNDPrsquos new social and environmental standards In 2014 UNDP ranked as the most transparent organization in the world on the International Aid Transparency Index

SUPPORT THE MOST VULNERABLE PROMOTE EQUITY AND ENABLE PROMPT RESPONSE TO CRISIS

bull Core funds are the pillar of our support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 UNDP allocated 90 of core programme resources to Low Income Countries (LICs) and 74 to Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Although only 10 of UNDPrsquos core programme resources went to Middle Income Countries (MICs) for every $1 of core resources invested in MICs UNDP leveraged $25 in other resources

bull UNDPrsquos core funds enable us to respond quickly and flexibly to crises The UN Secretary-General has tasked UNDP with leading the UN systemrsquos support for economic recovery from the Ebola crisis In 2014 UNDP allocated $545 million of core funds for the immediate Ebola response and helped pay 100 for response workers in affected countries to ensure uninterrupted health services case tracing and safe burials

WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL OTHER RESOURCES 15

OTHER RESOURCESOther resources range from lightly earmarked funds such as in the case of thematic funds to funds highly earmarked to specific programmes and projects Funds can be earmarked at the global regional country and most commonly project levels UN pooled funds and vertical funds are also earmarked for specific purposes

Funds earmarked to specific programmes and projects are received by UNDP either through a co-financing modality called ldquocost-sharingrdquo or in the form of trust funds The table below shows the top government contributors to other resources in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Chile

Uruguay

Armenia

China

Panama

Turkey

Republic of Korea

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Canada

Finland

Australia

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Denmark

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Switzerland

Brazil

Netherlands

Sweden

Peru

Norway

United Kingdom

Germany

Argentina

Japan

United States $4179M

$3046M

$1981M

$1252M

$927M

$910M

$885M

$875M

$675M

$613M

$552M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$353M

$352M

$296M

$250M

$230M

$229M

$217M

$209M

$202M

$185M

$183M

$151M

$143M

$136M

$130M

$123M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL DOMESTIC RESOURCES 16

DOMESTIC RESOURCESDomestic resources are funds earmarked to programmes and projects They are contributions channelled through UNDP by governments from their domestic resources through a modality known as ldquogovernment cost-sharingrdquo

The chart below ranks countriesrsquo domestic contributions through government cost-sharing (GCS) in terms of volume It does not reflect the relative importance of GCS to these countries as a proportion of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Some countries contribute a greater percentage of their GDPs towards GCS even if the volume of their contributions is smaller

For example Sao Tome and Principe contributed approximately 017 of its GDP towards GCS Similarly Guinea-Bis-sau Timor-Leste Benin and Chad contributed 009 006 005 and 005 respectively of their GDP towards GCS With a total of $851 million contributed in 2014 an increasing number of programme countries like Senegal are channelling their domestic resources towards a UNDP programme or project in support of their national priorities

0 $50M $100M $150M $200M

Equatorial Guinea

Kazakhstan

Macedonia former Yugoslav Rep

Guatemala

Serbia

Guyana

Azerbaijan

Honduras

Chad

Mexico

United Republic of Tanzania

Nigeria

India

Turkey

Morocco

Chile

China

Uruguay

Dominican Republic

Armenia

Panama

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Colombia

Egypt

Venezuela

Brazil

Peru

Argentina $1978M

$852M

$601M

$532M

$476M

$441M

$350M

$296M

$217M

$213M

$162M

$151M

$136M

$122M

$121M

$120M

$113M

$104M

$102M

$90M

$87M

$76M

$76M

$67M

$66M

$63M

$63M

$62M

$57M

$48M

$44M

$43M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL SENEGAL INVESTS USD 198 MILLION TO BOOST RURAL DEVELOPMENT 17

Senegal invests USD 198 million to boost rural developmentSenegal has initiated a vast local development programme to increase living standards across the countryside while at the same time stimulating the national economy

The initiative to be implemented by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) will accelerate the construction of roads and water points invest in agriculture and entrepreneurship and facilitate peoplersquos access to energy services

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 18

THEMATIC FUNDS

With thematic funds partners channel their contributions to support activities on a particular theme UNDP has thematic funds for Crisis Prevention and Recovery Environment Democratic Governance Poverty Reduction Gender and Information Communication and Technology In 2014 contributions to thematic funds were $119 million or 3 of total contributions

0

$30M

$60M

$90M

$120M

$150M

Poverty Reduction

Information Communication and Technology

Gender

Environment

Democratic Governance

Crisis Prevention and Recovery

20142013201220112010

THEMATIC TRUST FUND CONTRIBUTIONS 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 19

TOP CONTRIBUTORS TO THEMATIC FUNDS

NEW THEMATIC WINDOWS

UNDP is streamlining its thematic funding ldquowindowsrdquo to better respond to countriesrsquo needs and ensure that development funds are utilized more effectively and efficiently through improved management arrangements and results reporting

The new thematic windows to be operational in 2016 are in line with the objectives of the Strategic Plan and provide a vehicle for minimally earmarked contributions to be allocated to address priority needs and deliver quality results

GOVERNANCE AND PEACEBUILDING

bull Democratic Governancebull Conict Preventionbull HIVHealth and Development

POVERTY ERADICATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

bull Environment Mainstreamingbull Gender Empowerment and Equality

CLIMATE CHANGE AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION

bull Climate Changebull Disaster Risk Reduction

CRISIS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

bull Immediate Response to Crisisbull Crisis Recovery

INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING

0 $5M $10M $15M $20M $25M $30M

United States

Australia

Finland

Luxembourg

Sweden

Switzerland

Denmark

Norway

United Kingdom

Netherlands

Germany $291M

$244M

$148M

$119M

$79M

$63M

$62M

$45M

$42M

$36M

$18M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 20

VERTICAL FUNDS

Vertical funds are created in response to single-issue advocacy campaigns and to tackle specific development issues They are governed by Steering Committees which decide on funding portfolios and allocation criteria and are assisted by independent Secretariats

Of the vertical funds UNDP engages with the Global Fund is the largest followed by the Global Environmental Facility and the Montreal Protocol

GLOBAL FUND

UNDP has partnered with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria since 2003 supporting pro-grammes in countries with limited ability to receive and manage this kind of fund

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY

As a Global Environmental Facility (GEF) implementing agency since 1992 UNDP supports countries to secure GEF resources and to meet global environmental obligations UNDP offers integrated technical services for countries including assistance on eligibility assessment programme formulation mobilization of co-financing implementation oversight and knowledge and results management

MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL

UNDP as an implementing agency of the Multilateral Fund supports investment projects demonstration projects that test approaches to development challenges and provides technical assistance and feasibility studies

Montreal Protocol($25M)

Global Fund($412M)

GEF($301M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 21

GREEN CLIMATE FUND

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a new fund created under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) aimed at combatting urgent and serious effects of climate change It is designed to support developing countries move towards low-emission and climate-resilient development

The GCF Board has approved UNDP as the first UN agency that will be able to access the Fundrsquos resources for devel-oping countries alongside six other entities from the public and private sector

The accreditation by GCF is a significant step allowing UNDP to continue its leadership role in scaling up climate change mitigation and adaptation for sustainable development

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 22

UN POOLED FUNDS

Pooled fundingmdashmulti-donor trust funds (MDTFs) and joint programmesmdashis a mechanism for combining resources from multiple development partners and allocating such resources to multiple implementing entities to support specific national regional or global priorities

UNDP hosts the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO) established in 2003 to facilitate coordinated action through-out the UN system It achieves this in part by designing and administering pooled financing instruments that are efficient accountable and transparent As the appointed fund administrator administrative agent the MPTFO helps design funds and channel contributions from a large number of contributors

EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT POOLED FUND FUNCTIONS AND ADDED VALUE

MAIN FUNCTION OF THE FUND MAIN ADDED VALUE OF THE FUND

COHERENCEFills critical gaps and under-financed priorities to ensure a coherent and sequenced response in line with a strategic framework

CONSOLIDATIONReduces fragmentation with respect to particular priorities In many cases is the largest investment vehicle

SPECIALIZED OR THEMATIC

Has a specific expertise and focus on a particular thematic issue Usually the case for global funds

RISK MANAGEMENTReduces risks to governments and financial contributors through a comprehensive risk and result-based management system

INNOVATIONProvides a mechanism for clear attribution and transparency from innovative sources of finance Can also deepen national financing systems

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY FUNDING TYPE 7

Over the past five years there has been a decline in the amount of core resource contributions to UNDP an increase in highly earmarked contributions and a growing imbalance between core and other resources

COREOTHER RESOURCES TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING TYPE

In 2014 overall contributions to UNDP amounted to $4715 billion decreasing by 3 compared to $484 billion in 2013 Core resources (comprising 17 of total contributions) decreased by 11 to $793 million from $896 million in 2013 due to reduced contributions from partners currency fluctuations and non-receipt of contributions intended for 2014 Other resources received amounted to $3922 billion falling by 1 from $3944 billion in 2013

1 This figure excludes cash and in-kind contributions towards Government Local Office Costs (GLOC)

Other Resources($392B)

Regular Resources($793M)17

83

0

$1B

$2B

$3B

$4B

$5B

$6B

20142013201220112010

($4715B)($4840B)($4826B)($5055B)

($5277B)

Other ResourcesRegular Resources Total

82($4310B)

18($967M)

81($4080B)

19($975M)

82($3980B)

18($846M)

81($3944B)

19($896M)

83($3922B)

17($793M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 8

RESOURCES BY

FUNDING CHANNEL

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 9

With total resources in the range of $5 billion annually and programmes in 177 countries and territories contributions to UNDP are channelled through any of the following modalities 1) voluntary contributions to core resources 2) funds intended for specific thematic areas 3) funds earmarked to programmes and projects including government domestic resources 4) UN pooled funds or 5) funds confined to a single development domain or vertical funds

The illustration below shows the range of the flexibility of resources offered by the different funding channels Core resources offer the most flexibility while vertical funds offer the least

MORE FLEXIBLE FUNDING LESS FLEXIBLE FUNDING

CORE

The bedrock of the Organization for its

exibility

THEMATIC FUNDING

Lightly earmarked funding that allows the Organization to allocate funds to programmes

and projects in accordance with needs

and in line with the Strategic Plan

FUNDING EARMARKED TO PROGRAMMES OR

PROJECTS

Bilateral andmultilateral

contributions including domestic ressources from

programme countries

UN POOLED FUNDS

Funds from multiple partners allocated to

multiple implementing entities to support

specic national regional or global priorities

Multi-Donor Trust Funds and Joint Programmes

are the main mechanisms used by the UN system

VERTICAL FUNDS

Funds intended for a specic development

area (eg health climate change etc) approved for projects through a

call-for-proposals process

The largest share of contributions received by UNDP in 2014 was from bilateral and multilateral funds (58) of which 19 are domestic resources invested by programme countries Core resources (17) was the second largest followed by vertical funds (15) UN pooled funds (6) thematic funds (3) and Government Local Office Costs or GLOC (1)

UN Pooled funds(6)

Bilateral and multilateral funds(58)

(Domestic resources)(19)

Vertical funds(15)

Core resources(17)

GLOC(1)

Thematic funds(3)

FUNDING BY CHANNEL 2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 10

FUNDING BY CHANNEL 2009-2014

Since 2009 funds earmarked to programmes and projects have remained the biggest source of funding for UNDP

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

Thematic Funds

UN Pooled Funds

Vertical Funds

Core

Domestic Resources

Funds earmarked to programmes and projects

201420132012201120102009

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 11

CORE RESOURCES

Core resources form the bedrock of UNDP and hence are the bedrock of support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 56 partners contributed $793 million to core OECDDAC members contributed 975 of total core contribu-tions with the top 15 accounting for 96 of the total A total of $1927 million was received from non-DAC members

CORE CONTRIBUTIONS 2014

Africa2 Countries ($011M)

Other States1 Country ($010M)

Latin America and the Caribbean5 Countries ($055M)

Arab States7 Countries ($358M)

Europe and the CIS5 Countries ($428M)

Asia and the Pacic14 Countries ($1123M)

Non-DAC Members(25)

DAC Members(975)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 12

TOP 30 CONTRIBUTORS TO CORE RESOURCES

Contributions for 2014 from Canada and India were received in 2015 Contribution from Australia excludes amount intended for 2013 and received in 2014

0 $20M $40M $60M $80M $100M $120M

United Arab Emirates

Bangladesh

Iraq

Kuwait

Thailand

Russian Federation

Saudi Arabia

Austria

Turkey

Luxembourg

China

India

Italy

Korea Republic of

New Zealand

Ireland

Australia

France

Belgium

Germany

Finland

Canada

Netherlands

Denmark

Switzerland

Sweden

Japan

United States of America

United Kingdom

Norway $1122M

$903M

$810M

$805M

$729M

$635M

$601M

$368M

$356M

$303M

$291M

$237M

$186M

$181M

$117M

$66M

$64M

$44M

$43M

$38M

$36M

$30M

$21M

$20M

$11M

$09M

$06M

$05M

$04M

$03M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 13

PARTNERS THAT INCREASED THEIR CORE CONTRIBUTION IN 2014

PARTNERS THAT MADE EARLY PAYMENTS IN 2013 AND 2014

Austria

Bangladesh

Chile

Costa Rica

Estonia

Finland

France

Ireland

Kuwait

Belgium

Chile

Iraq

Mozambique

Luxembourg

New Zealand

Norway

Saudi Arabia

Singapore

South Africa

Thailand

UAE

United Kingdom

Republic of Korea

Sri Lanka

United States

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP 14

PARTNERS THAT INVEST IN UNDPrsquoS CORE FUNDING

JOIN FORCES WITH A LEADING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION AND ENSURE GLOBAL IMPACT

bull UNDP offers 50 years of experience in sustainable development and remains the partner of choice for governments and other actors across the globe to eradicate poverty and reduce inequalities and exclusion

bull Core resources enable UNDP to provide the international community with the most extensive field-based presence of the multilateral system to help countries deliver on internationally agreed development goals UNDPrsquos global reach represents the most cost-effective and strategic complement to bilateral cooperation

PROMOTE COHERENCE OF THE UN DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS AND TRANSPARENCY

bull Core resources form the bedrock of the UN Resident Coordinator system at country levelmdashmanaged and principally funded by UNDPmdash which brings together all UN development agencies for maximum impact This is crucial for UN country teamsrsquo support to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals

bull Core funds support the high standards of efficiency quality assurance and transparency UNDP has attained The new organizational structure is leaner by 10 overall and by 30 in New York allowing us to operate more effectively at the country level Tighter standards for project quality were introduced integrating UNDPrsquos new social and environmental standards In 2014 UNDP ranked as the most transparent organization in the world on the International Aid Transparency Index

SUPPORT THE MOST VULNERABLE PROMOTE EQUITY AND ENABLE PROMPT RESPONSE TO CRISIS

bull Core funds are the pillar of our support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 UNDP allocated 90 of core programme resources to Low Income Countries (LICs) and 74 to Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Although only 10 of UNDPrsquos core programme resources went to Middle Income Countries (MICs) for every $1 of core resources invested in MICs UNDP leveraged $25 in other resources

bull UNDPrsquos core funds enable us to respond quickly and flexibly to crises The UN Secretary-General has tasked UNDP with leading the UN systemrsquos support for economic recovery from the Ebola crisis In 2014 UNDP allocated $545 million of core funds for the immediate Ebola response and helped pay 100 for response workers in affected countries to ensure uninterrupted health services case tracing and safe burials

WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL OTHER RESOURCES 15

OTHER RESOURCESOther resources range from lightly earmarked funds such as in the case of thematic funds to funds highly earmarked to specific programmes and projects Funds can be earmarked at the global regional country and most commonly project levels UN pooled funds and vertical funds are also earmarked for specific purposes

Funds earmarked to specific programmes and projects are received by UNDP either through a co-financing modality called ldquocost-sharingrdquo or in the form of trust funds The table below shows the top government contributors to other resources in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Chile

Uruguay

Armenia

China

Panama

Turkey

Republic of Korea

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Canada

Finland

Australia

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Denmark

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Switzerland

Brazil

Netherlands

Sweden

Peru

Norway

United Kingdom

Germany

Argentina

Japan

United States $4179M

$3046M

$1981M

$1252M

$927M

$910M

$885M

$875M

$675M

$613M

$552M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$353M

$352M

$296M

$250M

$230M

$229M

$217M

$209M

$202M

$185M

$183M

$151M

$143M

$136M

$130M

$123M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL DOMESTIC RESOURCES 16

DOMESTIC RESOURCESDomestic resources are funds earmarked to programmes and projects They are contributions channelled through UNDP by governments from their domestic resources through a modality known as ldquogovernment cost-sharingrdquo

The chart below ranks countriesrsquo domestic contributions through government cost-sharing (GCS) in terms of volume It does not reflect the relative importance of GCS to these countries as a proportion of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Some countries contribute a greater percentage of their GDPs towards GCS even if the volume of their contributions is smaller

For example Sao Tome and Principe contributed approximately 017 of its GDP towards GCS Similarly Guinea-Bis-sau Timor-Leste Benin and Chad contributed 009 006 005 and 005 respectively of their GDP towards GCS With a total of $851 million contributed in 2014 an increasing number of programme countries like Senegal are channelling their domestic resources towards a UNDP programme or project in support of their national priorities

0 $50M $100M $150M $200M

Equatorial Guinea

Kazakhstan

Macedonia former Yugoslav Rep

Guatemala

Serbia

Guyana

Azerbaijan

Honduras

Chad

Mexico

United Republic of Tanzania

Nigeria

India

Turkey

Morocco

Chile

China

Uruguay

Dominican Republic

Armenia

Panama

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Colombia

Egypt

Venezuela

Brazil

Peru

Argentina $1978M

$852M

$601M

$532M

$476M

$441M

$350M

$296M

$217M

$213M

$162M

$151M

$136M

$122M

$121M

$120M

$113M

$104M

$102M

$90M

$87M

$76M

$76M

$67M

$66M

$63M

$63M

$62M

$57M

$48M

$44M

$43M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL SENEGAL INVESTS USD 198 MILLION TO BOOST RURAL DEVELOPMENT 17

Senegal invests USD 198 million to boost rural developmentSenegal has initiated a vast local development programme to increase living standards across the countryside while at the same time stimulating the national economy

The initiative to be implemented by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) will accelerate the construction of roads and water points invest in agriculture and entrepreneurship and facilitate peoplersquos access to energy services

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 18

THEMATIC FUNDS

With thematic funds partners channel their contributions to support activities on a particular theme UNDP has thematic funds for Crisis Prevention and Recovery Environment Democratic Governance Poverty Reduction Gender and Information Communication and Technology In 2014 contributions to thematic funds were $119 million or 3 of total contributions

0

$30M

$60M

$90M

$120M

$150M

Poverty Reduction

Information Communication and Technology

Gender

Environment

Democratic Governance

Crisis Prevention and Recovery

20142013201220112010

THEMATIC TRUST FUND CONTRIBUTIONS 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 19

TOP CONTRIBUTORS TO THEMATIC FUNDS

NEW THEMATIC WINDOWS

UNDP is streamlining its thematic funding ldquowindowsrdquo to better respond to countriesrsquo needs and ensure that development funds are utilized more effectively and efficiently through improved management arrangements and results reporting

The new thematic windows to be operational in 2016 are in line with the objectives of the Strategic Plan and provide a vehicle for minimally earmarked contributions to be allocated to address priority needs and deliver quality results

GOVERNANCE AND PEACEBUILDING

bull Democratic Governancebull Conict Preventionbull HIVHealth and Development

POVERTY ERADICATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

bull Environment Mainstreamingbull Gender Empowerment and Equality

CLIMATE CHANGE AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION

bull Climate Changebull Disaster Risk Reduction

CRISIS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

bull Immediate Response to Crisisbull Crisis Recovery

INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING

0 $5M $10M $15M $20M $25M $30M

United States

Australia

Finland

Luxembourg

Sweden

Switzerland

Denmark

Norway

United Kingdom

Netherlands

Germany $291M

$244M

$148M

$119M

$79M

$63M

$62M

$45M

$42M

$36M

$18M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 20

VERTICAL FUNDS

Vertical funds are created in response to single-issue advocacy campaigns and to tackle specific development issues They are governed by Steering Committees which decide on funding portfolios and allocation criteria and are assisted by independent Secretariats

Of the vertical funds UNDP engages with the Global Fund is the largest followed by the Global Environmental Facility and the Montreal Protocol

GLOBAL FUND

UNDP has partnered with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria since 2003 supporting pro-grammes in countries with limited ability to receive and manage this kind of fund

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY

As a Global Environmental Facility (GEF) implementing agency since 1992 UNDP supports countries to secure GEF resources and to meet global environmental obligations UNDP offers integrated technical services for countries including assistance on eligibility assessment programme formulation mobilization of co-financing implementation oversight and knowledge and results management

MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL

UNDP as an implementing agency of the Multilateral Fund supports investment projects demonstration projects that test approaches to development challenges and provides technical assistance and feasibility studies

Montreal Protocol($25M)

Global Fund($412M)

GEF($301M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 21

GREEN CLIMATE FUND

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a new fund created under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) aimed at combatting urgent and serious effects of climate change It is designed to support developing countries move towards low-emission and climate-resilient development

The GCF Board has approved UNDP as the first UN agency that will be able to access the Fundrsquos resources for devel-oping countries alongside six other entities from the public and private sector

The accreditation by GCF is a significant step allowing UNDP to continue its leadership role in scaling up climate change mitigation and adaptation for sustainable development

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 22

UN POOLED FUNDS

Pooled fundingmdashmulti-donor trust funds (MDTFs) and joint programmesmdashis a mechanism for combining resources from multiple development partners and allocating such resources to multiple implementing entities to support specific national regional or global priorities

UNDP hosts the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO) established in 2003 to facilitate coordinated action through-out the UN system It achieves this in part by designing and administering pooled financing instruments that are efficient accountable and transparent As the appointed fund administrator administrative agent the MPTFO helps design funds and channel contributions from a large number of contributors

EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT POOLED FUND FUNCTIONS AND ADDED VALUE

MAIN FUNCTION OF THE FUND MAIN ADDED VALUE OF THE FUND

COHERENCEFills critical gaps and under-financed priorities to ensure a coherent and sequenced response in line with a strategic framework

CONSOLIDATIONReduces fragmentation with respect to particular priorities In many cases is the largest investment vehicle

SPECIALIZED OR THEMATIC

Has a specific expertise and focus on a particular thematic issue Usually the case for global funds

RISK MANAGEMENTReduces risks to governments and financial contributors through a comprehensive risk and result-based management system

INNOVATIONProvides a mechanism for clear attribution and transparency from innovative sources of finance Can also deepen national financing systems

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 8

RESOURCES BY

FUNDING CHANNEL

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 9

With total resources in the range of $5 billion annually and programmes in 177 countries and territories contributions to UNDP are channelled through any of the following modalities 1) voluntary contributions to core resources 2) funds intended for specific thematic areas 3) funds earmarked to programmes and projects including government domestic resources 4) UN pooled funds or 5) funds confined to a single development domain or vertical funds

The illustration below shows the range of the flexibility of resources offered by the different funding channels Core resources offer the most flexibility while vertical funds offer the least

MORE FLEXIBLE FUNDING LESS FLEXIBLE FUNDING

CORE

The bedrock of the Organization for its

exibility

THEMATIC FUNDING

Lightly earmarked funding that allows the Organization to allocate funds to programmes

and projects in accordance with needs

and in line with the Strategic Plan

FUNDING EARMARKED TO PROGRAMMES OR

PROJECTS

Bilateral andmultilateral

contributions including domestic ressources from

programme countries

UN POOLED FUNDS

Funds from multiple partners allocated to

multiple implementing entities to support

specic national regional or global priorities

Multi-Donor Trust Funds and Joint Programmes

are the main mechanisms used by the UN system

VERTICAL FUNDS

Funds intended for a specic development

area (eg health climate change etc) approved for projects through a

call-for-proposals process

The largest share of contributions received by UNDP in 2014 was from bilateral and multilateral funds (58) of which 19 are domestic resources invested by programme countries Core resources (17) was the second largest followed by vertical funds (15) UN pooled funds (6) thematic funds (3) and Government Local Office Costs or GLOC (1)

UN Pooled funds(6)

Bilateral and multilateral funds(58)

(Domestic resources)(19)

Vertical funds(15)

Core resources(17)

GLOC(1)

Thematic funds(3)

FUNDING BY CHANNEL 2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 10

FUNDING BY CHANNEL 2009-2014

Since 2009 funds earmarked to programmes and projects have remained the biggest source of funding for UNDP

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

Thematic Funds

UN Pooled Funds

Vertical Funds

Core

Domestic Resources

Funds earmarked to programmes and projects

201420132012201120102009

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 11

CORE RESOURCES

Core resources form the bedrock of UNDP and hence are the bedrock of support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 56 partners contributed $793 million to core OECDDAC members contributed 975 of total core contribu-tions with the top 15 accounting for 96 of the total A total of $1927 million was received from non-DAC members

CORE CONTRIBUTIONS 2014

Africa2 Countries ($011M)

Other States1 Country ($010M)

Latin America and the Caribbean5 Countries ($055M)

Arab States7 Countries ($358M)

Europe and the CIS5 Countries ($428M)

Asia and the Pacic14 Countries ($1123M)

Non-DAC Members(25)

DAC Members(975)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 12

TOP 30 CONTRIBUTORS TO CORE RESOURCES

Contributions for 2014 from Canada and India were received in 2015 Contribution from Australia excludes amount intended for 2013 and received in 2014

0 $20M $40M $60M $80M $100M $120M

United Arab Emirates

Bangladesh

Iraq

Kuwait

Thailand

Russian Federation

Saudi Arabia

Austria

Turkey

Luxembourg

China

India

Italy

Korea Republic of

New Zealand

Ireland

Australia

France

Belgium

Germany

Finland

Canada

Netherlands

Denmark

Switzerland

Sweden

Japan

United States of America

United Kingdom

Norway $1122M

$903M

$810M

$805M

$729M

$635M

$601M

$368M

$356M

$303M

$291M

$237M

$186M

$181M

$117M

$66M

$64M

$44M

$43M

$38M

$36M

$30M

$21M

$20M

$11M

$09M

$06M

$05M

$04M

$03M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 13

PARTNERS THAT INCREASED THEIR CORE CONTRIBUTION IN 2014

PARTNERS THAT MADE EARLY PAYMENTS IN 2013 AND 2014

Austria

Bangladesh

Chile

Costa Rica

Estonia

Finland

France

Ireland

Kuwait

Belgium

Chile

Iraq

Mozambique

Luxembourg

New Zealand

Norway

Saudi Arabia

Singapore

South Africa

Thailand

UAE

United Kingdom

Republic of Korea

Sri Lanka

United States

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP 14

PARTNERS THAT INVEST IN UNDPrsquoS CORE FUNDING

JOIN FORCES WITH A LEADING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION AND ENSURE GLOBAL IMPACT

bull UNDP offers 50 years of experience in sustainable development and remains the partner of choice for governments and other actors across the globe to eradicate poverty and reduce inequalities and exclusion

bull Core resources enable UNDP to provide the international community with the most extensive field-based presence of the multilateral system to help countries deliver on internationally agreed development goals UNDPrsquos global reach represents the most cost-effective and strategic complement to bilateral cooperation

PROMOTE COHERENCE OF THE UN DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS AND TRANSPARENCY

bull Core resources form the bedrock of the UN Resident Coordinator system at country levelmdashmanaged and principally funded by UNDPmdash which brings together all UN development agencies for maximum impact This is crucial for UN country teamsrsquo support to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals

bull Core funds support the high standards of efficiency quality assurance and transparency UNDP has attained The new organizational structure is leaner by 10 overall and by 30 in New York allowing us to operate more effectively at the country level Tighter standards for project quality were introduced integrating UNDPrsquos new social and environmental standards In 2014 UNDP ranked as the most transparent organization in the world on the International Aid Transparency Index

SUPPORT THE MOST VULNERABLE PROMOTE EQUITY AND ENABLE PROMPT RESPONSE TO CRISIS

bull Core funds are the pillar of our support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 UNDP allocated 90 of core programme resources to Low Income Countries (LICs) and 74 to Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Although only 10 of UNDPrsquos core programme resources went to Middle Income Countries (MICs) for every $1 of core resources invested in MICs UNDP leveraged $25 in other resources

bull UNDPrsquos core funds enable us to respond quickly and flexibly to crises The UN Secretary-General has tasked UNDP with leading the UN systemrsquos support for economic recovery from the Ebola crisis In 2014 UNDP allocated $545 million of core funds for the immediate Ebola response and helped pay 100 for response workers in affected countries to ensure uninterrupted health services case tracing and safe burials

WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL OTHER RESOURCES 15

OTHER RESOURCESOther resources range from lightly earmarked funds such as in the case of thematic funds to funds highly earmarked to specific programmes and projects Funds can be earmarked at the global regional country and most commonly project levels UN pooled funds and vertical funds are also earmarked for specific purposes

Funds earmarked to specific programmes and projects are received by UNDP either through a co-financing modality called ldquocost-sharingrdquo or in the form of trust funds The table below shows the top government contributors to other resources in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Chile

Uruguay

Armenia

China

Panama

Turkey

Republic of Korea

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Canada

Finland

Australia

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Denmark

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Switzerland

Brazil

Netherlands

Sweden

Peru

Norway

United Kingdom

Germany

Argentina

Japan

United States $4179M

$3046M

$1981M

$1252M

$927M

$910M

$885M

$875M

$675M

$613M

$552M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$353M

$352M

$296M

$250M

$230M

$229M

$217M

$209M

$202M

$185M

$183M

$151M

$143M

$136M

$130M

$123M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL DOMESTIC RESOURCES 16

DOMESTIC RESOURCESDomestic resources are funds earmarked to programmes and projects They are contributions channelled through UNDP by governments from their domestic resources through a modality known as ldquogovernment cost-sharingrdquo

The chart below ranks countriesrsquo domestic contributions through government cost-sharing (GCS) in terms of volume It does not reflect the relative importance of GCS to these countries as a proportion of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Some countries contribute a greater percentage of their GDPs towards GCS even if the volume of their contributions is smaller

For example Sao Tome and Principe contributed approximately 017 of its GDP towards GCS Similarly Guinea-Bis-sau Timor-Leste Benin and Chad contributed 009 006 005 and 005 respectively of their GDP towards GCS With a total of $851 million contributed in 2014 an increasing number of programme countries like Senegal are channelling their domestic resources towards a UNDP programme or project in support of their national priorities

0 $50M $100M $150M $200M

Equatorial Guinea

Kazakhstan

Macedonia former Yugoslav Rep

Guatemala

Serbia

Guyana

Azerbaijan

Honduras

Chad

Mexico

United Republic of Tanzania

Nigeria

India

Turkey

Morocco

Chile

China

Uruguay

Dominican Republic

Armenia

Panama

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Colombia

Egypt

Venezuela

Brazil

Peru

Argentina $1978M

$852M

$601M

$532M

$476M

$441M

$350M

$296M

$217M

$213M

$162M

$151M

$136M

$122M

$121M

$120M

$113M

$104M

$102M

$90M

$87M

$76M

$76M

$67M

$66M

$63M

$63M

$62M

$57M

$48M

$44M

$43M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL SENEGAL INVESTS USD 198 MILLION TO BOOST RURAL DEVELOPMENT 17

Senegal invests USD 198 million to boost rural developmentSenegal has initiated a vast local development programme to increase living standards across the countryside while at the same time stimulating the national economy

The initiative to be implemented by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) will accelerate the construction of roads and water points invest in agriculture and entrepreneurship and facilitate peoplersquos access to energy services

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 18

THEMATIC FUNDS

With thematic funds partners channel their contributions to support activities on a particular theme UNDP has thematic funds for Crisis Prevention and Recovery Environment Democratic Governance Poverty Reduction Gender and Information Communication and Technology In 2014 contributions to thematic funds were $119 million or 3 of total contributions

0

$30M

$60M

$90M

$120M

$150M

Poverty Reduction

Information Communication and Technology

Gender

Environment

Democratic Governance

Crisis Prevention and Recovery

20142013201220112010

THEMATIC TRUST FUND CONTRIBUTIONS 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 19

TOP CONTRIBUTORS TO THEMATIC FUNDS

NEW THEMATIC WINDOWS

UNDP is streamlining its thematic funding ldquowindowsrdquo to better respond to countriesrsquo needs and ensure that development funds are utilized more effectively and efficiently through improved management arrangements and results reporting

The new thematic windows to be operational in 2016 are in line with the objectives of the Strategic Plan and provide a vehicle for minimally earmarked contributions to be allocated to address priority needs and deliver quality results

GOVERNANCE AND PEACEBUILDING

bull Democratic Governancebull Conict Preventionbull HIVHealth and Development

POVERTY ERADICATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

bull Environment Mainstreamingbull Gender Empowerment and Equality

CLIMATE CHANGE AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION

bull Climate Changebull Disaster Risk Reduction

CRISIS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

bull Immediate Response to Crisisbull Crisis Recovery

INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING

0 $5M $10M $15M $20M $25M $30M

United States

Australia

Finland

Luxembourg

Sweden

Switzerland

Denmark

Norway

United Kingdom

Netherlands

Germany $291M

$244M

$148M

$119M

$79M

$63M

$62M

$45M

$42M

$36M

$18M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 20

VERTICAL FUNDS

Vertical funds are created in response to single-issue advocacy campaigns and to tackle specific development issues They are governed by Steering Committees which decide on funding portfolios and allocation criteria and are assisted by independent Secretariats

Of the vertical funds UNDP engages with the Global Fund is the largest followed by the Global Environmental Facility and the Montreal Protocol

GLOBAL FUND

UNDP has partnered with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria since 2003 supporting pro-grammes in countries with limited ability to receive and manage this kind of fund

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY

As a Global Environmental Facility (GEF) implementing agency since 1992 UNDP supports countries to secure GEF resources and to meet global environmental obligations UNDP offers integrated technical services for countries including assistance on eligibility assessment programme formulation mobilization of co-financing implementation oversight and knowledge and results management

MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL

UNDP as an implementing agency of the Multilateral Fund supports investment projects demonstration projects that test approaches to development challenges and provides technical assistance and feasibility studies

Montreal Protocol($25M)

Global Fund($412M)

GEF($301M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 21

GREEN CLIMATE FUND

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a new fund created under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) aimed at combatting urgent and serious effects of climate change It is designed to support developing countries move towards low-emission and climate-resilient development

The GCF Board has approved UNDP as the first UN agency that will be able to access the Fundrsquos resources for devel-oping countries alongside six other entities from the public and private sector

The accreditation by GCF is a significant step allowing UNDP to continue its leadership role in scaling up climate change mitigation and adaptation for sustainable development

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 22

UN POOLED FUNDS

Pooled fundingmdashmulti-donor trust funds (MDTFs) and joint programmesmdashis a mechanism for combining resources from multiple development partners and allocating such resources to multiple implementing entities to support specific national regional or global priorities

UNDP hosts the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO) established in 2003 to facilitate coordinated action through-out the UN system It achieves this in part by designing and administering pooled financing instruments that are efficient accountable and transparent As the appointed fund administrator administrative agent the MPTFO helps design funds and channel contributions from a large number of contributors

EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT POOLED FUND FUNCTIONS AND ADDED VALUE

MAIN FUNCTION OF THE FUND MAIN ADDED VALUE OF THE FUND

COHERENCEFills critical gaps and under-financed priorities to ensure a coherent and sequenced response in line with a strategic framework

CONSOLIDATIONReduces fragmentation with respect to particular priorities In many cases is the largest investment vehicle

SPECIALIZED OR THEMATIC

Has a specific expertise and focus on a particular thematic issue Usually the case for global funds

RISK MANAGEMENTReduces risks to governments and financial contributors through a comprehensive risk and result-based management system

INNOVATIONProvides a mechanism for clear attribution and transparency from innovative sources of finance Can also deepen national financing systems

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 9

With total resources in the range of $5 billion annually and programmes in 177 countries and territories contributions to UNDP are channelled through any of the following modalities 1) voluntary contributions to core resources 2) funds intended for specific thematic areas 3) funds earmarked to programmes and projects including government domestic resources 4) UN pooled funds or 5) funds confined to a single development domain or vertical funds

The illustration below shows the range of the flexibility of resources offered by the different funding channels Core resources offer the most flexibility while vertical funds offer the least

MORE FLEXIBLE FUNDING LESS FLEXIBLE FUNDING

CORE

The bedrock of the Organization for its

exibility

THEMATIC FUNDING

Lightly earmarked funding that allows the Organization to allocate funds to programmes

and projects in accordance with needs

and in line with the Strategic Plan

FUNDING EARMARKED TO PROGRAMMES OR

PROJECTS

Bilateral andmultilateral

contributions including domestic ressources from

programme countries

UN POOLED FUNDS

Funds from multiple partners allocated to

multiple implementing entities to support

specic national regional or global priorities

Multi-Donor Trust Funds and Joint Programmes

are the main mechanisms used by the UN system

VERTICAL FUNDS

Funds intended for a specic development

area (eg health climate change etc) approved for projects through a

call-for-proposals process

The largest share of contributions received by UNDP in 2014 was from bilateral and multilateral funds (58) of which 19 are domestic resources invested by programme countries Core resources (17) was the second largest followed by vertical funds (15) UN pooled funds (6) thematic funds (3) and Government Local Office Costs or GLOC (1)

UN Pooled funds(6)

Bilateral and multilateral funds(58)

(Domestic resources)(19)

Vertical funds(15)

Core resources(17)

GLOC(1)

Thematic funds(3)

FUNDING BY CHANNEL 2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 10

FUNDING BY CHANNEL 2009-2014

Since 2009 funds earmarked to programmes and projects have remained the biggest source of funding for UNDP

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

Thematic Funds

UN Pooled Funds

Vertical Funds

Core

Domestic Resources

Funds earmarked to programmes and projects

201420132012201120102009

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 11

CORE RESOURCES

Core resources form the bedrock of UNDP and hence are the bedrock of support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 56 partners contributed $793 million to core OECDDAC members contributed 975 of total core contribu-tions with the top 15 accounting for 96 of the total A total of $1927 million was received from non-DAC members

CORE CONTRIBUTIONS 2014

Africa2 Countries ($011M)

Other States1 Country ($010M)

Latin America and the Caribbean5 Countries ($055M)

Arab States7 Countries ($358M)

Europe and the CIS5 Countries ($428M)

Asia and the Pacic14 Countries ($1123M)

Non-DAC Members(25)

DAC Members(975)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 12

TOP 30 CONTRIBUTORS TO CORE RESOURCES

Contributions for 2014 from Canada and India were received in 2015 Contribution from Australia excludes amount intended for 2013 and received in 2014

0 $20M $40M $60M $80M $100M $120M

United Arab Emirates

Bangladesh

Iraq

Kuwait

Thailand

Russian Federation

Saudi Arabia

Austria

Turkey

Luxembourg

China

India

Italy

Korea Republic of

New Zealand

Ireland

Australia

France

Belgium

Germany

Finland

Canada

Netherlands

Denmark

Switzerland

Sweden

Japan

United States of America

United Kingdom

Norway $1122M

$903M

$810M

$805M

$729M

$635M

$601M

$368M

$356M

$303M

$291M

$237M

$186M

$181M

$117M

$66M

$64M

$44M

$43M

$38M

$36M

$30M

$21M

$20M

$11M

$09M

$06M

$05M

$04M

$03M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 13

PARTNERS THAT INCREASED THEIR CORE CONTRIBUTION IN 2014

PARTNERS THAT MADE EARLY PAYMENTS IN 2013 AND 2014

Austria

Bangladesh

Chile

Costa Rica

Estonia

Finland

France

Ireland

Kuwait

Belgium

Chile

Iraq

Mozambique

Luxembourg

New Zealand

Norway

Saudi Arabia

Singapore

South Africa

Thailand

UAE

United Kingdom

Republic of Korea

Sri Lanka

United States

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP 14

PARTNERS THAT INVEST IN UNDPrsquoS CORE FUNDING

JOIN FORCES WITH A LEADING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION AND ENSURE GLOBAL IMPACT

bull UNDP offers 50 years of experience in sustainable development and remains the partner of choice for governments and other actors across the globe to eradicate poverty and reduce inequalities and exclusion

bull Core resources enable UNDP to provide the international community with the most extensive field-based presence of the multilateral system to help countries deliver on internationally agreed development goals UNDPrsquos global reach represents the most cost-effective and strategic complement to bilateral cooperation

PROMOTE COHERENCE OF THE UN DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS AND TRANSPARENCY

bull Core resources form the bedrock of the UN Resident Coordinator system at country levelmdashmanaged and principally funded by UNDPmdash which brings together all UN development agencies for maximum impact This is crucial for UN country teamsrsquo support to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals

bull Core funds support the high standards of efficiency quality assurance and transparency UNDP has attained The new organizational structure is leaner by 10 overall and by 30 in New York allowing us to operate more effectively at the country level Tighter standards for project quality were introduced integrating UNDPrsquos new social and environmental standards In 2014 UNDP ranked as the most transparent organization in the world on the International Aid Transparency Index

SUPPORT THE MOST VULNERABLE PROMOTE EQUITY AND ENABLE PROMPT RESPONSE TO CRISIS

bull Core funds are the pillar of our support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 UNDP allocated 90 of core programme resources to Low Income Countries (LICs) and 74 to Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Although only 10 of UNDPrsquos core programme resources went to Middle Income Countries (MICs) for every $1 of core resources invested in MICs UNDP leveraged $25 in other resources

bull UNDPrsquos core funds enable us to respond quickly and flexibly to crises The UN Secretary-General has tasked UNDP with leading the UN systemrsquos support for economic recovery from the Ebola crisis In 2014 UNDP allocated $545 million of core funds for the immediate Ebola response and helped pay 100 for response workers in affected countries to ensure uninterrupted health services case tracing and safe burials

WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL OTHER RESOURCES 15

OTHER RESOURCESOther resources range from lightly earmarked funds such as in the case of thematic funds to funds highly earmarked to specific programmes and projects Funds can be earmarked at the global regional country and most commonly project levels UN pooled funds and vertical funds are also earmarked for specific purposes

Funds earmarked to specific programmes and projects are received by UNDP either through a co-financing modality called ldquocost-sharingrdquo or in the form of trust funds The table below shows the top government contributors to other resources in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Chile

Uruguay

Armenia

China

Panama

Turkey

Republic of Korea

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Canada

Finland

Australia

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Denmark

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Switzerland

Brazil

Netherlands

Sweden

Peru

Norway

United Kingdom

Germany

Argentina

Japan

United States $4179M

$3046M

$1981M

$1252M

$927M

$910M

$885M

$875M

$675M

$613M

$552M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$353M

$352M

$296M

$250M

$230M

$229M

$217M

$209M

$202M

$185M

$183M

$151M

$143M

$136M

$130M

$123M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL DOMESTIC RESOURCES 16

DOMESTIC RESOURCESDomestic resources are funds earmarked to programmes and projects They are contributions channelled through UNDP by governments from their domestic resources through a modality known as ldquogovernment cost-sharingrdquo

The chart below ranks countriesrsquo domestic contributions through government cost-sharing (GCS) in terms of volume It does not reflect the relative importance of GCS to these countries as a proportion of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Some countries contribute a greater percentage of their GDPs towards GCS even if the volume of their contributions is smaller

For example Sao Tome and Principe contributed approximately 017 of its GDP towards GCS Similarly Guinea-Bis-sau Timor-Leste Benin and Chad contributed 009 006 005 and 005 respectively of their GDP towards GCS With a total of $851 million contributed in 2014 an increasing number of programme countries like Senegal are channelling their domestic resources towards a UNDP programme or project in support of their national priorities

0 $50M $100M $150M $200M

Equatorial Guinea

Kazakhstan

Macedonia former Yugoslav Rep

Guatemala

Serbia

Guyana

Azerbaijan

Honduras

Chad

Mexico

United Republic of Tanzania

Nigeria

India

Turkey

Morocco

Chile

China

Uruguay

Dominican Republic

Armenia

Panama

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Colombia

Egypt

Venezuela

Brazil

Peru

Argentina $1978M

$852M

$601M

$532M

$476M

$441M

$350M

$296M

$217M

$213M

$162M

$151M

$136M

$122M

$121M

$120M

$113M

$104M

$102M

$90M

$87M

$76M

$76M

$67M

$66M

$63M

$63M

$62M

$57M

$48M

$44M

$43M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL SENEGAL INVESTS USD 198 MILLION TO BOOST RURAL DEVELOPMENT 17

Senegal invests USD 198 million to boost rural developmentSenegal has initiated a vast local development programme to increase living standards across the countryside while at the same time stimulating the national economy

The initiative to be implemented by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) will accelerate the construction of roads and water points invest in agriculture and entrepreneurship and facilitate peoplersquos access to energy services

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 18

THEMATIC FUNDS

With thematic funds partners channel their contributions to support activities on a particular theme UNDP has thematic funds for Crisis Prevention and Recovery Environment Democratic Governance Poverty Reduction Gender and Information Communication and Technology In 2014 contributions to thematic funds were $119 million or 3 of total contributions

0

$30M

$60M

$90M

$120M

$150M

Poverty Reduction

Information Communication and Technology

Gender

Environment

Democratic Governance

Crisis Prevention and Recovery

20142013201220112010

THEMATIC TRUST FUND CONTRIBUTIONS 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 19

TOP CONTRIBUTORS TO THEMATIC FUNDS

NEW THEMATIC WINDOWS

UNDP is streamlining its thematic funding ldquowindowsrdquo to better respond to countriesrsquo needs and ensure that development funds are utilized more effectively and efficiently through improved management arrangements and results reporting

The new thematic windows to be operational in 2016 are in line with the objectives of the Strategic Plan and provide a vehicle for minimally earmarked contributions to be allocated to address priority needs and deliver quality results

GOVERNANCE AND PEACEBUILDING

bull Democratic Governancebull Conict Preventionbull HIVHealth and Development

POVERTY ERADICATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

bull Environment Mainstreamingbull Gender Empowerment and Equality

CLIMATE CHANGE AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION

bull Climate Changebull Disaster Risk Reduction

CRISIS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

bull Immediate Response to Crisisbull Crisis Recovery

INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING

0 $5M $10M $15M $20M $25M $30M

United States

Australia

Finland

Luxembourg

Sweden

Switzerland

Denmark

Norway

United Kingdom

Netherlands

Germany $291M

$244M

$148M

$119M

$79M

$63M

$62M

$45M

$42M

$36M

$18M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 20

VERTICAL FUNDS

Vertical funds are created in response to single-issue advocacy campaigns and to tackle specific development issues They are governed by Steering Committees which decide on funding portfolios and allocation criteria and are assisted by independent Secretariats

Of the vertical funds UNDP engages with the Global Fund is the largest followed by the Global Environmental Facility and the Montreal Protocol

GLOBAL FUND

UNDP has partnered with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria since 2003 supporting pro-grammes in countries with limited ability to receive and manage this kind of fund

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY

As a Global Environmental Facility (GEF) implementing agency since 1992 UNDP supports countries to secure GEF resources and to meet global environmental obligations UNDP offers integrated technical services for countries including assistance on eligibility assessment programme formulation mobilization of co-financing implementation oversight and knowledge and results management

MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL

UNDP as an implementing agency of the Multilateral Fund supports investment projects demonstration projects that test approaches to development challenges and provides technical assistance and feasibility studies

Montreal Protocol($25M)

Global Fund($412M)

GEF($301M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 21

GREEN CLIMATE FUND

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a new fund created under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) aimed at combatting urgent and serious effects of climate change It is designed to support developing countries move towards low-emission and climate-resilient development

The GCF Board has approved UNDP as the first UN agency that will be able to access the Fundrsquos resources for devel-oping countries alongside six other entities from the public and private sector

The accreditation by GCF is a significant step allowing UNDP to continue its leadership role in scaling up climate change mitigation and adaptation for sustainable development

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 22

UN POOLED FUNDS

Pooled fundingmdashmulti-donor trust funds (MDTFs) and joint programmesmdashis a mechanism for combining resources from multiple development partners and allocating such resources to multiple implementing entities to support specific national regional or global priorities

UNDP hosts the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO) established in 2003 to facilitate coordinated action through-out the UN system It achieves this in part by designing and administering pooled financing instruments that are efficient accountable and transparent As the appointed fund administrator administrative agent the MPTFO helps design funds and channel contributions from a large number of contributors

EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT POOLED FUND FUNCTIONS AND ADDED VALUE

MAIN FUNCTION OF THE FUND MAIN ADDED VALUE OF THE FUND

COHERENCEFills critical gaps and under-financed priorities to ensure a coherent and sequenced response in line with a strategic framework

CONSOLIDATIONReduces fragmentation with respect to particular priorities In many cases is the largest investment vehicle

SPECIALIZED OR THEMATIC

Has a specific expertise and focus on a particular thematic issue Usually the case for global funds

RISK MANAGEMENTReduces risks to governments and financial contributors through a comprehensive risk and result-based management system

INNOVATIONProvides a mechanism for clear attribution and transparency from innovative sources of finance Can also deepen national financing systems

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL 10

FUNDING BY CHANNEL 2009-2014

Since 2009 funds earmarked to programmes and projects have remained the biggest source of funding for UNDP

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

Thematic Funds

UN Pooled Funds

Vertical Funds

Core

Domestic Resources

Funds earmarked to programmes and projects

201420132012201120102009

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 11

CORE RESOURCES

Core resources form the bedrock of UNDP and hence are the bedrock of support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 56 partners contributed $793 million to core OECDDAC members contributed 975 of total core contribu-tions with the top 15 accounting for 96 of the total A total of $1927 million was received from non-DAC members

CORE CONTRIBUTIONS 2014

Africa2 Countries ($011M)

Other States1 Country ($010M)

Latin America and the Caribbean5 Countries ($055M)

Arab States7 Countries ($358M)

Europe and the CIS5 Countries ($428M)

Asia and the Pacic14 Countries ($1123M)

Non-DAC Members(25)

DAC Members(975)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 12

TOP 30 CONTRIBUTORS TO CORE RESOURCES

Contributions for 2014 from Canada and India were received in 2015 Contribution from Australia excludes amount intended for 2013 and received in 2014

0 $20M $40M $60M $80M $100M $120M

United Arab Emirates

Bangladesh

Iraq

Kuwait

Thailand

Russian Federation

Saudi Arabia

Austria

Turkey

Luxembourg

China

India

Italy

Korea Republic of

New Zealand

Ireland

Australia

France

Belgium

Germany

Finland

Canada

Netherlands

Denmark

Switzerland

Sweden

Japan

United States of America

United Kingdom

Norway $1122M

$903M

$810M

$805M

$729M

$635M

$601M

$368M

$356M

$303M

$291M

$237M

$186M

$181M

$117M

$66M

$64M

$44M

$43M

$38M

$36M

$30M

$21M

$20M

$11M

$09M

$06M

$05M

$04M

$03M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 13

PARTNERS THAT INCREASED THEIR CORE CONTRIBUTION IN 2014

PARTNERS THAT MADE EARLY PAYMENTS IN 2013 AND 2014

Austria

Bangladesh

Chile

Costa Rica

Estonia

Finland

France

Ireland

Kuwait

Belgium

Chile

Iraq

Mozambique

Luxembourg

New Zealand

Norway

Saudi Arabia

Singapore

South Africa

Thailand

UAE

United Kingdom

Republic of Korea

Sri Lanka

United States

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP 14

PARTNERS THAT INVEST IN UNDPrsquoS CORE FUNDING

JOIN FORCES WITH A LEADING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION AND ENSURE GLOBAL IMPACT

bull UNDP offers 50 years of experience in sustainable development and remains the partner of choice for governments and other actors across the globe to eradicate poverty and reduce inequalities and exclusion

bull Core resources enable UNDP to provide the international community with the most extensive field-based presence of the multilateral system to help countries deliver on internationally agreed development goals UNDPrsquos global reach represents the most cost-effective and strategic complement to bilateral cooperation

PROMOTE COHERENCE OF THE UN DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS AND TRANSPARENCY

bull Core resources form the bedrock of the UN Resident Coordinator system at country levelmdashmanaged and principally funded by UNDPmdash which brings together all UN development agencies for maximum impact This is crucial for UN country teamsrsquo support to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals

bull Core funds support the high standards of efficiency quality assurance and transparency UNDP has attained The new organizational structure is leaner by 10 overall and by 30 in New York allowing us to operate more effectively at the country level Tighter standards for project quality were introduced integrating UNDPrsquos new social and environmental standards In 2014 UNDP ranked as the most transparent organization in the world on the International Aid Transparency Index

SUPPORT THE MOST VULNERABLE PROMOTE EQUITY AND ENABLE PROMPT RESPONSE TO CRISIS

bull Core funds are the pillar of our support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 UNDP allocated 90 of core programme resources to Low Income Countries (LICs) and 74 to Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Although only 10 of UNDPrsquos core programme resources went to Middle Income Countries (MICs) for every $1 of core resources invested in MICs UNDP leveraged $25 in other resources

bull UNDPrsquos core funds enable us to respond quickly and flexibly to crises The UN Secretary-General has tasked UNDP with leading the UN systemrsquos support for economic recovery from the Ebola crisis In 2014 UNDP allocated $545 million of core funds for the immediate Ebola response and helped pay 100 for response workers in affected countries to ensure uninterrupted health services case tracing and safe burials

WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL OTHER RESOURCES 15

OTHER RESOURCESOther resources range from lightly earmarked funds such as in the case of thematic funds to funds highly earmarked to specific programmes and projects Funds can be earmarked at the global regional country and most commonly project levels UN pooled funds and vertical funds are also earmarked for specific purposes

Funds earmarked to specific programmes and projects are received by UNDP either through a co-financing modality called ldquocost-sharingrdquo or in the form of trust funds The table below shows the top government contributors to other resources in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Chile

Uruguay

Armenia

China

Panama

Turkey

Republic of Korea

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Canada

Finland

Australia

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Denmark

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Switzerland

Brazil

Netherlands

Sweden

Peru

Norway

United Kingdom

Germany

Argentina

Japan

United States $4179M

$3046M

$1981M

$1252M

$927M

$910M

$885M

$875M

$675M

$613M

$552M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$353M

$352M

$296M

$250M

$230M

$229M

$217M

$209M

$202M

$185M

$183M

$151M

$143M

$136M

$130M

$123M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL DOMESTIC RESOURCES 16

DOMESTIC RESOURCESDomestic resources are funds earmarked to programmes and projects They are contributions channelled through UNDP by governments from their domestic resources through a modality known as ldquogovernment cost-sharingrdquo

The chart below ranks countriesrsquo domestic contributions through government cost-sharing (GCS) in terms of volume It does not reflect the relative importance of GCS to these countries as a proportion of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Some countries contribute a greater percentage of their GDPs towards GCS even if the volume of their contributions is smaller

For example Sao Tome and Principe contributed approximately 017 of its GDP towards GCS Similarly Guinea-Bis-sau Timor-Leste Benin and Chad contributed 009 006 005 and 005 respectively of their GDP towards GCS With a total of $851 million contributed in 2014 an increasing number of programme countries like Senegal are channelling their domestic resources towards a UNDP programme or project in support of their national priorities

0 $50M $100M $150M $200M

Equatorial Guinea

Kazakhstan

Macedonia former Yugoslav Rep

Guatemala

Serbia

Guyana

Azerbaijan

Honduras

Chad

Mexico

United Republic of Tanzania

Nigeria

India

Turkey

Morocco

Chile

China

Uruguay

Dominican Republic

Armenia

Panama

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Colombia

Egypt

Venezuela

Brazil

Peru

Argentina $1978M

$852M

$601M

$532M

$476M

$441M

$350M

$296M

$217M

$213M

$162M

$151M

$136M

$122M

$121M

$120M

$113M

$104M

$102M

$90M

$87M

$76M

$76M

$67M

$66M

$63M

$63M

$62M

$57M

$48M

$44M

$43M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL SENEGAL INVESTS USD 198 MILLION TO BOOST RURAL DEVELOPMENT 17

Senegal invests USD 198 million to boost rural developmentSenegal has initiated a vast local development programme to increase living standards across the countryside while at the same time stimulating the national economy

The initiative to be implemented by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) will accelerate the construction of roads and water points invest in agriculture and entrepreneurship and facilitate peoplersquos access to energy services

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 18

THEMATIC FUNDS

With thematic funds partners channel their contributions to support activities on a particular theme UNDP has thematic funds for Crisis Prevention and Recovery Environment Democratic Governance Poverty Reduction Gender and Information Communication and Technology In 2014 contributions to thematic funds were $119 million or 3 of total contributions

0

$30M

$60M

$90M

$120M

$150M

Poverty Reduction

Information Communication and Technology

Gender

Environment

Democratic Governance

Crisis Prevention and Recovery

20142013201220112010

THEMATIC TRUST FUND CONTRIBUTIONS 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 19

TOP CONTRIBUTORS TO THEMATIC FUNDS

NEW THEMATIC WINDOWS

UNDP is streamlining its thematic funding ldquowindowsrdquo to better respond to countriesrsquo needs and ensure that development funds are utilized more effectively and efficiently through improved management arrangements and results reporting

The new thematic windows to be operational in 2016 are in line with the objectives of the Strategic Plan and provide a vehicle for minimally earmarked contributions to be allocated to address priority needs and deliver quality results

GOVERNANCE AND PEACEBUILDING

bull Democratic Governancebull Conict Preventionbull HIVHealth and Development

POVERTY ERADICATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

bull Environment Mainstreamingbull Gender Empowerment and Equality

CLIMATE CHANGE AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION

bull Climate Changebull Disaster Risk Reduction

CRISIS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

bull Immediate Response to Crisisbull Crisis Recovery

INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING

0 $5M $10M $15M $20M $25M $30M

United States

Australia

Finland

Luxembourg

Sweden

Switzerland

Denmark

Norway

United Kingdom

Netherlands

Germany $291M

$244M

$148M

$119M

$79M

$63M

$62M

$45M

$42M

$36M

$18M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 20

VERTICAL FUNDS

Vertical funds are created in response to single-issue advocacy campaigns and to tackle specific development issues They are governed by Steering Committees which decide on funding portfolios and allocation criteria and are assisted by independent Secretariats

Of the vertical funds UNDP engages with the Global Fund is the largest followed by the Global Environmental Facility and the Montreal Protocol

GLOBAL FUND

UNDP has partnered with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria since 2003 supporting pro-grammes in countries with limited ability to receive and manage this kind of fund

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY

As a Global Environmental Facility (GEF) implementing agency since 1992 UNDP supports countries to secure GEF resources and to meet global environmental obligations UNDP offers integrated technical services for countries including assistance on eligibility assessment programme formulation mobilization of co-financing implementation oversight and knowledge and results management

MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL

UNDP as an implementing agency of the Multilateral Fund supports investment projects demonstration projects that test approaches to development challenges and provides technical assistance and feasibility studies

Montreal Protocol($25M)

Global Fund($412M)

GEF($301M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 21

GREEN CLIMATE FUND

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a new fund created under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) aimed at combatting urgent and serious effects of climate change It is designed to support developing countries move towards low-emission and climate-resilient development

The GCF Board has approved UNDP as the first UN agency that will be able to access the Fundrsquos resources for devel-oping countries alongside six other entities from the public and private sector

The accreditation by GCF is a significant step allowing UNDP to continue its leadership role in scaling up climate change mitigation and adaptation for sustainable development

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 22

UN POOLED FUNDS

Pooled fundingmdashmulti-donor trust funds (MDTFs) and joint programmesmdashis a mechanism for combining resources from multiple development partners and allocating such resources to multiple implementing entities to support specific national regional or global priorities

UNDP hosts the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO) established in 2003 to facilitate coordinated action through-out the UN system It achieves this in part by designing and administering pooled financing instruments that are efficient accountable and transparent As the appointed fund administrator administrative agent the MPTFO helps design funds and channel contributions from a large number of contributors

EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT POOLED FUND FUNCTIONS AND ADDED VALUE

MAIN FUNCTION OF THE FUND MAIN ADDED VALUE OF THE FUND

COHERENCEFills critical gaps and under-financed priorities to ensure a coherent and sequenced response in line with a strategic framework

CONSOLIDATIONReduces fragmentation with respect to particular priorities In many cases is the largest investment vehicle

SPECIALIZED OR THEMATIC

Has a specific expertise and focus on a particular thematic issue Usually the case for global funds

RISK MANAGEMENTReduces risks to governments and financial contributors through a comprehensive risk and result-based management system

INNOVATIONProvides a mechanism for clear attribution and transparency from innovative sources of finance Can also deepen national financing systems

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 11

CORE RESOURCES

Core resources form the bedrock of UNDP and hence are the bedrock of support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 56 partners contributed $793 million to core OECDDAC members contributed 975 of total core contribu-tions with the top 15 accounting for 96 of the total A total of $1927 million was received from non-DAC members

CORE CONTRIBUTIONS 2014

Africa2 Countries ($011M)

Other States1 Country ($010M)

Latin America and the Caribbean5 Countries ($055M)

Arab States7 Countries ($358M)

Europe and the CIS5 Countries ($428M)

Asia and the Pacic14 Countries ($1123M)

Non-DAC Members(25)

DAC Members(975)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 12

TOP 30 CONTRIBUTORS TO CORE RESOURCES

Contributions for 2014 from Canada and India were received in 2015 Contribution from Australia excludes amount intended for 2013 and received in 2014

0 $20M $40M $60M $80M $100M $120M

United Arab Emirates

Bangladesh

Iraq

Kuwait

Thailand

Russian Federation

Saudi Arabia

Austria

Turkey

Luxembourg

China

India

Italy

Korea Republic of

New Zealand

Ireland

Australia

France

Belgium

Germany

Finland

Canada

Netherlands

Denmark

Switzerland

Sweden

Japan

United States of America

United Kingdom

Norway $1122M

$903M

$810M

$805M

$729M

$635M

$601M

$368M

$356M

$303M

$291M

$237M

$186M

$181M

$117M

$66M

$64M

$44M

$43M

$38M

$36M

$30M

$21M

$20M

$11M

$09M

$06M

$05M

$04M

$03M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 13

PARTNERS THAT INCREASED THEIR CORE CONTRIBUTION IN 2014

PARTNERS THAT MADE EARLY PAYMENTS IN 2013 AND 2014

Austria

Bangladesh

Chile

Costa Rica

Estonia

Finland

France

Ireland

Kuwait

Belgium

Chile

Iraq

Mozambique

Luxembourg

New Zealand

Norway

Saudi Arabia

Singapore

South Africa

Thailand

UAE

United Kingdom

Republic of Korea

Sri Lanka

United States

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP 14

PARTNERS THAT INVEST IN UNDPrsquoS CORE FUNDING

JOIN FORCES WITH A LEADING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION AND ENSURE GLOBAL IMPACT

bull UNDP offers 50 years of experience in sustainable development and remains the partner of choice for governments and other actors across the globe to eradicate poverty and reduce inequalities and exclusion

bull Core resources enable UNDP to provide the international community with the most extensive field-based presence of the multilateral system to help countries deliver on internationally agreed development goals UNDPrsquos global reach represents the most cost-effective and strategic complement to bilateral cooperation

PROMOTE COHERENCE OF THE UN DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS AND TRANSPARENCY

bull Core resources form the bedrock of the UN Resident Coordinator system at country levelmdashmanaged and principally funded by UNDPmdash which brings together all UN development agencies for maximum impact This is crucial for UN country teamsrsquo support to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals

bull Core funds support the high standards of efficiency quality assurance and transparency UNDP has attained The new organizational structure is leaner by 10 overall and by 30 in New York allowing us to operate more effectively at the country level Tighter standards for project quality were introduced integrating UNDPrsquos new social and environmental standards In 2014 UNDP ranked as the most transparent organization in the world on the International Aid Transparency Index

SUPPORT THE MOST VULNERABLE PROMOTE EQUITY AND ENABLE PROMPT RESPONSE TO CRISIS

bull Core funds are the pillar of our support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 UNDP allocated 90 of core programme resources to Low Income Countries (LICs) and 74 to Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Although only 10 of UNDPrsquos core programme resources went to Middle Income Countries (MICs) for every $1 of core resources invested in MICs UNDP leveraged $25 in other resources

bull UNDPrsquos core funds enable us to respond quickly and flexibly to crises The UN Secretary-General has tasked UNDP with leading the UN systemrsquos support for economic recovery from the Ebola crisis In 2014 UNDP allocated $545 million of core funds for the immediate Ebola response and helped pay 100 for response workers in affected countries to ensure uninterrupted health services case tracing and safe burials

WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL OTHER RESOURCES 15

OTHER RESOURCESOther resources range from lightly earmarked funds such as in the case of thematic funds to funds highly earmarked to specific programmes and projects Funds can be earmarked at the global regional country and most commonly project levels UN pooled funds and vertical funds are also earmarked for specific purposes

Funds earmarked to specific programmes and projects are received by UNDP either through a co-financing modality called ldquocost-sharingrdquo or in the form of trust funds The table below shows the top government contributors to other resources in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Chile

Uruguay

Armenia

China

Panama

Turkey

Republic of Korea

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Canada

Finland

Australia

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Denmark

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Switzerland

Brazil

Netherlands

Sweden

Peru

Norway

United Kingdom

Germany

Argentina

Japan

United States $4179M

$3046M

$1981M

$1252M

$927M

$910M

$885M

$875M

$675M

$613M

$552M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$353M

$352M

$296M

$250M

$230M

$229M

$217M

$209M

$202M

$185M

$183M

$151M

$143M

$136M

$130M

$123M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL DOMESTIC RESOURCES 16

DOMESTIC RESOURCESDomestic resources are funds earmarked to programmes and projects They are contributions channelled through UNDP by governments from their domestic resources through a modality known as ldquogovernment cost-sharingrdquo

The chart below ranks countriesrsquo domestic contributions through government cost-sharing (GCS) in terms of volume It does not reflect the relative importance of GCS to these countries as a proportion of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Some countries contribute a greater percentage of their GDPs towards GCS even if the volume of their contributions is smaller

For example Sao Tome and Principe contributed approximately 017 of its GDP towards GCS Similarly Guinea-Bis-sau Timor-Leste Benin and Chad contributed 009 006 005 and 005 respectively of their GDP towards GCS With a total of $851 million contributed in 2014 an increasing number of programme countries like Senegal are channelling their domestic resources towards a UNDP programme or project in support of their national priorities

0 $50M $100M $150M $200M

Equatorial Guinea

Kazakhstan

Macedonia former Yugoslav Rep

Guatemala

Serbia

Guyana

Azerbaijan

Honduras

Chad

Mexico

United Republic of Tanzania

Nigeria

India

Turkey

Morocco

Chile

China

Uruguay

Dominican Republic

Armenia

Panama

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Colombia

Egypt

Venezuela

Brazil

Peru

Argentina $1978M

$852M

$601M

$532M

$476M

$441M

$350M

$296M

$217M

$213M

$162M

$151M

$136M

$122M

$121M

$120M

$113M

$104M

$102M

$90M

$87M

$76M

$76M

$67M

$66M

$63M

$63M

$62M

$57M

$48M

$44M

$43M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL SENEGAL INVESTS USD 198 MILLION TO BOOST RURAL DEVELOPMENT 17

Senegal invests USD 198 million to boost rural developmentSenegal has initiated a vast local development programme to increase living standards across the countryside while at the same time stimulating the national economy

The initiative to be implemented by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) will accelerate the construction of roads and water points invest in agriculture and entrepreneurship and facilitate peoplersquos access to energy services

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 18

THEMATIC FUNDS

With thematic funds partners channel their contributions to support activities on a particular theme UNDP has thematic funds for Crisis Prevention and Recovery Environment Democratic Governance Poverty Reduction Gender and Information Communication and Technology In 2014 contributions to thematic funds were $119 million or 3 of total contributions

0

$30M

$60M

$90M

$120M

$150M

Poverty Reduction

Information Communication and Technology

Gender

Environment

Democratic Governance

Crisis Prevention and Recovery

20142013201220112010

THEMATIC TRUST FUND CONTRIBUTIONS 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 19

TOP CONTRIBUTORS TO THEMATIC FUNDS

NEW THEMATIC WINDOWS

UNDP is streamlining its thematic funding ldquowindowsrdquo to better respond to countriesrsquo needs and ensure that development funds are utilized more effectively and efficiently through improved management arrangements and results reporting

The new thematic windows to be operational in 2016 are in line with the objectives of the Strategic Plan and provide a vehicle for minimally earmarked contributions to be allocated to address priority needs and deliver quality results

GOVERNANCE AND PEACEBUILDING

bull Democratic Governancebull Conict Preventionbull HIVHealth and Development

POVERTY ERADICATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

bull Environment Mainstreamingbull Gender Empowerment and Equality

CLIMATE CHANGE AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION

bull Climate Changebull Disaster Risk Reduction

CRISIS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

bull Immediate Response to Crisisbull Crisis Recovery

INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING

0 $5M $10M $15M $20M $25M $30M

United States

Australia

Finland

Luxembourg

Sweden

Switzerland

Denmark

Norway

United Kingdom

Netherlands

Germany $291M

$244M

$148M

$119M

$79M

$63M

$62M

$45M

$42M

$36M

$18M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 20

VERTICAL FUNDS

Vertical funds are created in response to single-issue advocacy campaigns and to tackle specific development issues They are governed by Steering Committees which decide on funding portfolios and allocation criteria and are assisted by independent Secretariats

Of the vertical funds UNDP engages with the Global Fund is the largest followed by the Global Environmental Facility and the Montreal Protocol

GLOBAL FUND

UNDP has partnered with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria since 2003 supporting pro-grammes in countries with limited ability to receive and manage this kind of fund

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY

As a Global Environmental Facility (GEF) implementing agency since 1992 UNDP supports countries to secure GEF resources and to meet global environmental obligations UNDP offers integrated technical services for countries including assistance on eligibility assessment programme formulation mobilization of co-financing implementation oversight and knowledge and results management

MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL

UNDP as an implementing agency of the Multilateral Fund supports investment projects demonstration projects that test approaches to development challenges and provides technical assistance and feasibility studies

Montreal Protocol($25M)

Global Fund($412M)

GEF($301M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 21

GREEN CLIMATE FUND

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a new fund created under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) aimed at combatting urgent and serious effects of climate change It is designed to support developing countries move towards low-emission and climate-resilient development

The GCF Board has approved UNDP as the first UN agency that will be able to access the Fundrsquos resources for devel-oping countries alongside six other entities from the public and private sector

The accreditation by GCF is a significant step allowing UNDP to continue its leadership role in scaling up climate change mitigation and adaptation for sustainable development

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 22

UN POOLED FUNDS

Pooled fundingmdashmulti-donor trust funds (MDTFs) and joint programmesmdashis a mechanism for combining resources from multiple development partners and allocating such resources to multiple implementing entities to support specific national regional or global priorities

UNDP hosts the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO) established in 2003 to facilitate coordinated action through-out the UN system It achieves this in part by designing and administering pooled financing instruments that are efficient accountable and transparent As the appointed fund administrator administrative agent the MPTFO helps design funds and channel contributions from a large number of contributors

EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT POOLED FUND FUNCTIONS AND ADDED VALUE

MAIN FUNCTION OF THE FUND MAIN ADDED VALUE OF THE FUND

COHERENCEFills critical gaps and under-financed priorities to ensure a coherent and sequenced response in line with a strategic framework

CONSOLIDATIONReduces fragmentation with respect to particular priorities In many cases is the largest investment vehicle

SPECIALIZED OR THEMATIC

Has a specific expertise and focus on a particular thematic issue Usually the case for global funds

RISK MANAGEMENTReduces risks to governments and financial contributors through a comprehensive risk and result-based management system

INNOVATIONProvides a mechanism for clear attribution and transparency from innovative sources of finance Can also deepen national financing systems

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 12

TOP 30 CONTRIBUTORS TO CORE RESOURCES

Contributions for 2014 from Canada and India were received in 2015 Contribution from Australia excludes amount intended for 2013 and received in 2014

0 $20M $40M $60M $80M $100M $120M

United Arab Emirates

Bangladesh

Iraq

Kuwait

Thailand

Russian Federation

Saudi Arabia

Austria

Turkey

Luxembourg

China

India

Italy

Korea Republic of

New Zealand

Ireland

Australia

France

Belgium

Germany

Finland

Canada

Netherlands

Denmark

Switzerland

Sweden

Japan

United States of America

United Kingdom

Norway $1122M

$903M

$810M

$805M

$729M

$635M

$601M

$368M

$356M

$303M

$291M

$237M

$186M

$181M

$117M

$66M

$64M

$44M

$43M

$38M

$36M

$30M

$21M

$20M

$11M

$09M

$06M

$05M

$04M

$03M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 13

PARTNERS THAT INCREASED THEIR CORE CONTRIBUTION IN 2014

PARTNERS THAT MADE EARLY PAYMENTS IN 2013 AND 2014

Austria

Bangladesh

Chile

Costa Rica

Estonia

Finland

France

Ireland

Kuwait

Belgium

Chile

Iraq

Mozambique

Luxembourg

New Zealand

Norway

Saudi Arabia

Singapore

South Africa

Thailand

UAE

United Kingdom

Republic of Korea

Sri Lanka

United States

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP 14

PARTNERS THAT INVEST IN UNDPrsquoS CORE FUNDING

JOIN FORCES WITH A LEADING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION AND ENSURE GLOBAL IMPACT

bull UNDP offers 50 years of experience in sustainable development and remains the partner of choice for governments and other actors across the globe to eradicate poverty and reduce inequalities and exclusion

bull Core resources enable UNDP to provide the international community with the most extensive field-based presence of the multilateral system to help countries deliver on internationally agreed development goals UNDPrsquos global reach represents the most cost-effective and strategic complement to bilateral cooperation

PROMOTE COHERENCE OF THE UN DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS AND TRANSPARENCY

bull Core resources form the bedrock of the UN Resident Coordinator system at country levelmdashmanaged and principally funded by UNDPmdash which brings together all UN development agencies for maximum impact This is crucial for UN country teamsrsquo support to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals

bull Core funds support the high standards of efficiency quality assurance and transparency UNDP has attained The new organizational structure is leaner by 10 overall and by 30 in New York allowing us to operate more effectively at the country level Tighter standards for project quality were introduced integrating UNDPrsquos new social and environmental standards In 2014 UNDP ranked as the most transparent organization in the world on the International Aid Transparency Index

SUPPORT THE MOST VULNERABLE PROMOTE EQUITY AND ENABLE PROMPT RESPONSE TO CRISIS

bull Core funds are the pillar of our support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 UNDP allocated 90 of core programme resources to Low Income Countries (LICs) and 74 to Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Although only 10 of UNDPrsquos core programme resources went to Middle Income Countries (MICs) for every $1 of core resources invested in MICs UNDP leveraged $25 in other resources

bull UNDPrsquos core funds enable us to respond quickly and flexibly to crises The UN Secretary-General has tasked UNDP with leading the UN systemrsquos support for economic recovery from the Ebola crisis In 2014 UNDP allocated $545 million of core funds for the immediate Ebola response and helped pay 100 for response workers in affected countries to ensure uninterrupted health services case tracing and safe burials

WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL OTHER RESOURCES 15

OTHER RESOURCESOther resources range from lightly earmarked funds such as in the case of thematic funds to funds highly earmarked to specific programmes and projects Funds can be earmarked at the global regional country and most commonly project levels UN pooled funds and vertical funds are also earmarked for specific purposes

Funds earmarked to specific programmes and projects are received by UNDP either through a co-financing modality called ldquocost-sharingrdquo or in the form of trust funds The table below shows the top government contributors to other resources in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Chile

Uruguay

Armenia

China

Panama

Turkey

Republic of Korea

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Canada

Finland

Australia

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Denmark

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Switzerland

Brazil

Netherlands

Sweden

Peru

Norway

United Kingdom

Germany

Argentina

Japan

United States $4179M

$3046M

$1981M

$1252M

$927M

$910M

$885M

$875M

$675M

$613M

$552M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$353M

$352M

$296M

$250M

$230M

$229M

$217M

$209M

$202M

$185M

$183M

$151M

$143M

$136M

$130M

$123M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL DOMESTIC RESOURCES 16

DOMESTIC RESOURCESDomestic resources are funds earmarked to programmes and projects They are contributions channelled through UNDP by governments from their domestic resources through a modality known as ldquogovernment cost-sharingrdquo

The chart below ranks countriesrsquo domestic contributions through government cost-sharing (GCS) in terms of volume It does not reflect the relative importance of GCS to these countries as a proportion of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Some countries contribute a greater percentage of their GDPs towards GCS even if the volume of their contributions is smaller

For example Sao Tome and Principe contributed approximately 017 of its GDP towards GCS Similarly Guinea-Bis-sau Timor-Leste Benin and Chad contributed 009 006 005 and 005 respectively of their GDP towards GCS With a total of $851 million contributed in 2014 an increasing number of programme countries like Senegal are channelling their domestic resources towards a UNDP programme or project in support of their national priorities

0 $50M $100M $150M $200M

Equatorial Guinea

Kazakhstan

Macedonia former Yugoslav Rep

Guatemala

Serbia

Guyana

Azerbaijan

Honduras

Chad

Mexico

United Republic of Tanzania

Nigeria

India

Turkey

Morocco

Chile

China

Uruguay

Dominican Republic

Armenia

Panama

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Colombia

Egypt

Venezuela

Brazil

Peru

Argentina $1978M

$852M

$601M

$532M

$476M

$441M

$350M

$296M

$217M

$213M

$162M

$151M

$136M

$122M

$121M

$120M

$113M

$104M

$102M

$90M

$87M

$76M

$76M

$67M

$66M

$63M

$63M

$62M

$57M

$48M

$44M

$43M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL SENEGAL INVESTS USD 198 MILLION TO BOOST RURAL DEVELOPMENT 17

Senegal invests USD 198 million to boost rural developmentSenegal has initiated a vast local development programme to increase living standards across the countryside while at the same time stimulating the national economy

The initiative to be implemented by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) will accelerate the construction of roads and water points invest in agriculture and entrepreneurship and facilitate peoplersquos access to energy services

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 18

THEMATIC FUNDS

With thematic funds partners channel their contributions to support activities on a particular theme UNDP has thematic funds for Crisis Prevention and Recovery Environment Democratic Governance Poverty Reduction Gender and Information Communication and Technology In 2014 contributions to thematic funds were $119 million or 3 of total contributions

0

$30M

$60M

$90M

$120M

$150M

Poverty Reduction

Information Communication and Technology

Gender

Environment

Democratic Governance

Crisis Prevention and Recovery

20142013201220112010

THEMATIC TRUST FUND CONTRIBUTIONS 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 19

TOP CONTRIBUTORS TO THEMATIC FUNDS

NEW THEMATIC WINDOWS

UNDP is streamlining its thematic funding ldquowindowsrdquo to better respond to countriesrsquo needs and ensure that development funds are utilized more effectively and efficiently through improved management arrangements and results reporting

The new thematic windows to be operational in 2016 are in line with the objectives of the Strategic Plan and provide a vehicle for minimally earmarked contributions to be allocated to address priority needs and deliver quality results

GOVERNANCE AND PEACEBUILDING

bull Democratic Governancebull Conict Preventionbull HIVHealth and Development

POVERTY ERADICATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

bull Environment Mainstreamingbull Gender Empowerment and Equality

CLIMATE CHANGE AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION

bull Climate Changebull Disaster Risk Reduction

CRISIS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

bull Immediate Response to Crisisbull Crisis Recovery

INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING

0 $5M $10M $15M $20M $25M $30M

United States

Australia

Finland

Luxembourg

Sweden

Switzerland

Denmark

Norway

United Kingdom

Netherlands

Germany $291M

$244M

$148M

$119M

$79M

$63M

$62M

$45M

$42M

$36M

$18M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 20

VERTICAL FUNDS

Vertical funds are created in response to single-issue advocacy campaigns and to tackle specific development issues They are governed by Steering Committees which decide on funding portfolios and allocation criteria and are assisted by independent Secretariats

Of the vertical funds UNDP engages with the Global Fund is the largest followed by the Global Environmental Facility and the Montreal Protocol

GLOBAL FUND

UNDP has partnered with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria since 2003 supporting pro-grammes in countries with limited ability to receive and manage this kind of fund

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY

As a Global Environmental Facility (GEF) implementing agency since 1992 UNDP supports countries to secure GEF resources and to meet global environmental obligations UNDP offers integrated technical services for countries including assistance on eligibility assessment programme formulation mobilization of co-financing implementation oversight and knowledge and results management

MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL

UNDP as an implementing agency of the Multilateral Fund supports investment projects demonstration projects that test approaches to development challenges and provides technical assistance and feasibility studies

Montreal Protocol($25M)

Global Fund($412M)

GEF($301M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 21

GREEN CLIMATE FUND

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a new fund created under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) aimed at combatting urgent and serious effects of climate change It is designed to support developing countries move towards low-emission and climate-resilient development

The GCF Board has approved UNDP as the first UN agency that will be able to access the Fundrsquos resources for devel-oping countries alongside six other entities from the public and private sector

The accreditation by GCF is a significant step allowing UNDP to continue its leadership role in scaling up climate change mitigation and adaptation for sustainable development

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 22

UN POOLED FUNDS

Pooled fundingmdashmulti-donor trust funds (MDTFs) and joint programmesmdashis a mechanism for combining resources from multiple development partners and allocating such resources to multiple implementing entities to support specific national regional or global priorities

UNDP hosts the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO) established in 2003 to facilitate coordinated action through-out the UN system It achieves this in part by designing and administering pooled financing instruments that are efficient accountable and transparent As the appointed fund administrator administrative agent the MPTFO helps design funds and channel contributions from a large number of contributors

EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT POOLED FUND FUNCTIONS AND ADDED VALUE

MAIN FUNCTION OF THE FUND MAIN ADDED VALUE OF THE FUND

COHERENCEFills critical gaps and under-financed priorities to ensure a coherent and sequenced response in line with a strategic framework

CONSOLIDATIONReduces fragmentation with respect to particular priorities In many cases is the largest investment vehicle

SPECIALIZED OR THEMATIC

Has a specific expertise and focus on a particular thematic issue Usually the case for global funds

RISK MANAGEMENTReduces risks to governments and financial contributors through a comprehensive risk and result-based management system

INNOVATIONProvides a mechanism for clear attribution and transparency from innovative sources of finance Can also deepen national financing systems

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL CORE RESOURCES 13

PARTNERS THAT INCREASED THEIR CORE CONTRIBUTION IN 2014

PARTNERS THAT MADE EARLY PAYMENTS IN 2013 AND 2014

Austria

Bangladesh

Chile

Costa Rica

Estonia

Finland

France

Ireland

Kuwait

Belgium

Chile

Iraq

Mozambique

Luxembourg

New Zealand

Norway

Saudi Arabia

Singapore

South Africa

Thailand

UAE

United Kingdom

Republic of Korea

Sri Lanka

United States

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP 14

PARTNERS THAT INVEST IN UNDPrsquoS CORE FUNDING

JOIN FORCES WITH A LEADING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION AND ENSURE GLOBAL IMPACT

bull UNDP offers 50 years of experience in sustainable development and remains the partner of choice for governments and other actors across the globe to eradicate poverty and reduce inequalities and exclusion

bull Core resources enable UNDP to provide the international community with the most extensive field-based presence of the multilateral system to help countries deliver on internationally agreed development goals UNDPrsquos global reach represents the most cost-effective and strategic complement to bilateral cooperation

PROMOTE COHERENCE OF THE UN DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS AND TRANSPARENCY

bull Core resources form the bedrock of the UN Resident Coordinator system at country levelmdashmanaged and principally funded by UNDPmdash which brings together all UN development agencies for maximum impact This is crucial for UN country teamsrsquo support to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals

bull Core funds support the high standards of efficiency quality assurance and transparency UNDP has attained The new organizational structure is leaner by 10 overall and by 30 in New York allowing us to operate more effectively at the country level Tighter standards for project quality were introduced integrating UNDPrsquos new social and environmental standards In 2014 UNDP ranked as the most transparent organization in the world on the International Aid Transparency Index

SUPPORT THE MOST VULNERABLE PROMOTE EQUITY AND ENABLE PROMPT RESPONSE TO CRISIS

bull Core funds are the pillar of our support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 UNDP allocated 90 of core programme resources to Low Income Countries (LICs) and 74 to Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Although only 10 of UNDPrsquos core programme resources went to Middle Income Countries (MICs) for every $1 of core resources invested in MICs UNDP leveraged $25 in other resources

bull UNDPrsquos core funds enable us to respond quickly and flexibly to crises The UN Secretary-General has tasked UNDP with leading the UN systemrsquos support for economic recovery from the Ebola crisis In 2014 UNDP allocated $545 million of core funds for the immediate Ebola response and helped pay 100 for response workers in affected countries to ensure uninterrupted health services case tracing and safe burials

WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL OTHER RESOURCES 15

OTHER RESOURCESOther resources range from lightly earmarked funds such as in the case of thematic funds to funds highly earmarked to specific programmes and projects Funds can be earmarked at the global regional country and most commonly project levels UN pooled funds and vertical funds are also earmarked for specific purposes

Funds earmarked to specific programmes and projects are received by UNDP either through a co-financing modality called ldquocost-sharingrdquo or in the form of trust funds The table below shows the top government contributors to other resources in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Chile

Uruguay

Armenia

China

Panama

Turkey

Republic of Korea

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Canada

Finland

Australia

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Denmark

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Switzerland

Brazil

Netherlands

Sweden

Peru

Norway

United Kingdom

Germany

Argentina

Japan

United States $4179M

$3046M

$1981M

$1252M

$927M

$910M

$885M

$875M

$675M

$613M

$552M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$353M

$352M

$296M

$250M

$230M

$229M

$217M

$209M

$202M

$185M

$183M

$151M

$143M

$136M

$130M

$123M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL DOMESTIC RESOURCES 16

DOMESTIC RESOURCESDomestic resources are funds earmarked to programmes and projects They are contributions channelled through UNDP by governments from their domestic resources through a modality known as ldquogovernment cost-sharingrdquo

The chart below ranks countriesrsquo domestic contributions through government cost-sharing (GCS) in terms of volume It does not reflect the relative importance of GCS to these countries as a proportion of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Some countries contribute a greater percentage of their GDPs towards GCS even if the volume of their contributions is smaller

For example Sao Tome and Principe contributed approximately 017 of its GDP towards GCS Similarly Guinea-Bis-sau Timor-Leste Benin and Chad contributed 009 006 005 and 005 respectively of their GDP towards GCS With a total of $851 million contributed in 2014 an increasing number of programme countries like Senegal are channelling their domestic resources towards a UNDP programme or project in support of their national priorities

0 $50M $100M $150M $200M

Equatorial Guinea

Kazakhstan

Macedonia former Yugoslav Rep

Guatemala

Serbia

Guyana

Azerbaijan

Honduras

Chad

Mexico

United Republic of Tanzania

Nigeria

India

Turkey

Morocco

Chile

China

Uruguay

Dominican Republic

Armenia

Panama

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Colombia

Egypt

Venezuela

Brazil

Peru

Argentina $1978M

$852M

$601M

$532M

$476M

$441M

$350M

$296M

$217M

$213M

$162M

$151M

$136M

$122M

$121M

$120M

$113M

$104M

$102M

$90M

$87M

$76M

$76M

$67M

$66M

$63M

$63M

$62M

$57M

$48M

$44M

$43M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL SENEGAL INVESTS USD 198 MILLION TO BOOST RURAL DEVELOPMENT 17

Senegal invests USD 198 million to boost rural developmentSenegal has initiated a vast local development programme to increase living standards across the countryside while at the same time stimulating the national economy

The initiative to be implemented by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) will accelerate the construction of roads and water points invest in agriculture and entrepreneurship and facilitate peoplersquos access to energy services

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 18

THEMATIC FUNDS

With thematic funds partners channel their contributions to support activities on a particular theme UNDP has thematic funds for Crisis Prevention and Recovery Environment Democratic Governance Poverty Reduction Gender and Information Communication and Technology In 2014 contributions to thematic funds were $119 million or 3 of total contributions

0

$30M

$60M

$90M

$120M

$150M

Poverty Reduction

Information Communication and Technology

Gender

Environment

Democratic Governance

Crisis Prevention and Recovery

20142013201220112010

THEMATIC TRUST FUND CONTRIBUTIONS 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 19

TOP CONTRIBUTORS TO THEMATIC FUNDS

NEW THEMATIC WINDOWS

UNDP is streamlining its thematic funding ldquowindowsrdquo to better respond to countriesrsquo needs and ensure that development funds are utilized more effectively and efficiently through improved management arrangements and results reporting

The new thematic windows to be operational in 2016 are in line with the objectives of the Strategic Plan and provide a vehicle for minimally earmarked contributions to be allocated to address priority needs and deliver quality results

GOVERNANCE AND PEACEBUILDING

bull Democratic Governancebull Conict Preventionbull HIVHealth and Development

POVERTY ERADICATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

bull Environment Mainstreamingbull Gender Empowerment and Equality

CLIMATE CHANGE AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION

bull Climate Changebull Disaster Risk Reduction

CRISIS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

bull Immediate Response to Crisisbull Crisis Recovery

INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING

0 $5M $10M $15M $20M $25M $30M

United States

Australia

Finland

Luxembourg

Sweden

Switzerland

Denmark

Norway

United Kingdom

Netherlands

Germany $291M

$244M

$148M

$119M

$79M

$63M

$62M

$45M

$42M

$36M

$18M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 20

VERTICAL FUNDS

Vertical funds are created in response to single-issue advocacy campaigns and to tackle specific development issues They are governed by Steering Committees which decide on funding portfolios and allocation criteria and are assisted by independent Secretariats

Of the vertical funds UNDP engages with the Global Fund is the largest followed by the Global Environmental Facility and the Montreal Protocol

GLOBAL FUND

UNDP has partnered with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria since 2003 supporting pro-grammes in countries with limited ability to receive and manage this kind of fund

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY

As a Global Environmental Facility (GEF) implementing agency since 1992 UNDP supports countries to secure GEF resources and to meet global environmental obligations UNDP offers integrated technical services for countries including assistance on eligibility assessment programme formulation mobilization of co-financing implementation oversight and knowledge and results management

MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL

UNDP as an implementing agency of the Multilateral Fund supports investment projects demonstration projects that test approaches to development challenges and provides technical assistance and feasibility studies

Montreal Protocol($25M)

Global Fund($412M)

GEF($301M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 21

GREEN CLIMATE FUND

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a new fund created under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) aimed at combatting urgent and serious effects of climate change It is designed to support developing countries move towards low-emission and climate-resilient development

The GCF Board has approved UNDP as the first UN agency that will be able to access the Fundrsquos resources for devel-oping countries alongside six other entities from the public and private sector

The accreditation by GCF is a significant step allowing UNDP to continue its leadership role in scaling up climate change mitigation and adaptation for sustainable development

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 22

UN POOLED FUNDS

Pooled fundingmdashmulti-donor trust funds (MDTFs) and joint programmesmdashis a mechanism for combining resources from multiple development partners and allocating such resources to multiple implementing entities to support specific national regional or global priorities

UNDP hosts the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO) established in 2003 to facilitate coordinated action through-out the UN system It achieves this in part by designing and administering pooled financing instruments that are efficient accountable and transparent As the appointed fund administrator administrative agent the MPTFO helps design funds and channel contributions from a large number of contributors

EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT POOLED FUND FUNCTIONS AND ADDED VALUE

MAIN FUNCTION OF THE FUND MAIN ADDED VALUE OF THE FUND

COHERENCEFills critical gaps and under-financed priorities to ensure a coherent and sequenced response in line with a strategic framework

CONSOLIDATIONReduces fragmentation with respect to particular priorities In many cases is the largest investment vehicle

SPECIALIZED OR THEMATIC

Has a specific expertise and focus on a particular thematic issue Usually the case for global funds

RISK MANAGEMENTReduces risks to governments and financial contributors through a comprehensive risk and result-based management system

INNOVATIONProvides a mechanism for clear attribution and transparency from innovative sources of finance Can also deepen national financing systems

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP 14

PARTNERS THAT INVEST IN UNDPrsquoS CORE FUNDING

JOIN FORCES WITH A LEADING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION AND ENSURE GLOBAL IMPACT

bull UNDP offers 50 years of experience in sustainable development and remains the partner of choice for governments and other actors across the globe to eradicate poverty and reduce inequalities and exclusion

bull Core resources enable UNDP to provide the international community with the most extensive field-based presence of the multilateral system to help countries deliver on internationally agreed development goals UNDPrsquos global reach represents the most cost-effective and strategic complement to bilateral cooperation

PROMOTE COHERENCE OF THE UN DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS AND TRANSPARENCY

bull Core resources form the bedrock of the UN Resident Coordinator system at country levelmdashmanaged and principally funded by UNDPmdash which brings together all UN development agencies for maximum impact This is crucial for UN country teamsrsquo support to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals

bull Core funds support the high standards of efficiency quality assurance and transparency UNDP has attained The new organizational structure is leaner by 10 overall and by 30 in New York allowing us to operate more effectively at the country level Tighter standards for project quality were introduced integrating UNDPrsquos new social and environmental standards In 2014 UNDP ranked as the most transparent organization in the world on the International Aid Transparency Index

SUPPORT THE MOST VULNERABLE PROMOTE EQUITY AND ENABLE PROMPT RESPONSE TO CRISIS

bull Core funds are the pillar of our support to the worldrsquos poorest countries In 2014 UNDP allocated 90 of core programme resources to Low Income Countries (LICs) and 74 to Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Although only 10 of UNDPrsquos core programme resources went to Middle Income Countries (MICs) for every $1 of core resources invested in MICs UNDP leveraged $25 in other resources

bull UNDPrsquos core funds enable us to respond quickly and flexibly to crises The UN Secretary-General has tasked UNDP with leading the UN systemrsquos support for economic recovery from the Ebola crisis In 2014 UNDP allocated $545 million of core funds for the immediate Ebola response and helped pay 100 for response workers in affected countries to ensure uninterrupted health services case tracing and safe burials

WHY INVEST IN THE CORE FUNDING OF UNDP

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL OTHER RESOURCES 15

OTHER RESOURCESOther resources range from lightly earmarked funds such as in the case of thematic funds to funds highly earmarked to specific programmes and projects Funds can be earmarked at the global regional country and most commonly project levels UN pooled funds and vertical funds are also earmarked for specific purposes

Funds earmarked to specific programmes and projects are received by UNDP either through a co-financing modality called ldquocost-sharingrdquo or in the form of trust funds The table below shows the top government contributors to other resources in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Chile

Uruguay

Armenia

China

Panama

Turkey

Republic of Korea

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Canada

Finland

Australia

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Denmark

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Switzerland

Brazil

Netherlands

Sweden

Peru

Norway

United Kingdom

Germany

Argentina

Japan

United States $4179M

$3046M

$1981M

$1252M

$927M

$910M

$885M

$875M

$675M

$613M

$552M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$353M

$352M

$296M

$250M

$230M

$229M

$217M

$209M

$202M

$185M

$183M

$151M

$143M

$136M

$130M

$123M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL DOMESTIC RESOURCES 16

DOMESTIC RESOURCESDomestic resources are funds earmarked to programmes and projects They are contributions channelled through UNDP by governments from their domestic resources through a modality known as ldquogovernment cost-sharingrdquo

The chart below ranks countriesrsquo domestic contributions through government cost-sharing (GCS) in terms of volume It does not reflect the relative importance of GCS to these countries as a proportion of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Some countries contribute a greater percentage of their GDPs towards GCS even if the volume of their contributions is smaller

For example Sao Tome and Principe contributed approximately 017 of its GDP towards GCS Similarly Guinea-Bis-sau Timor-Leste Benin and Chad contributed 009 006 005 and 005 respectively of their GDP towards GCS With a total of $851 million contributed in 2014 an increasing number of programme countries like Senegal are channelling their domestic resources towards a UNDP programme or project in support of their national priorities

0 $50M $100M $150M $200M

Equatorial Guinea

Kazakhstan

Macedonia former Yugoslav Rep

Guatemala

Serbia

Guyana

Azerbaijan

Honduras

Chad

Mexico

United Republic of Tanzania

Nigeria

India

Turkey

Morocco

Chile

China

Uruguay

Dominican Republic

Armenia

Panama

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Colombia

Egypt

Venezuela

Brazil

Peru

Argentina $1978M

$852M

$601M

$532M

$476M

$441M

$350M

$296M

$217M

$213M

$162M

$151M

$136M

$122M

$121M

$120M

$113M

$104M

$102M

$90M

$87M

$76M

$76M

$67M

$66M

$63M

$63M

$62M

$57M

$48M

$44M

$43M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL SENEGAL INVESTS USD 198 MILLION TO BOOST RURAL DEVELOPMENT 17

Senegal invests USD 198 million to boost rural developmentSenegal has initiated a vast local development programme to increase living standards across the countryside while at the same time stimulating the national economy

The initiative to be implemented by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) will accelerate the construction of roads and water points invest in agriculture and entrepreneurship and facilitate peoplersquos access to energy services

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 18

THEMATIC FUNDS

With thematic funds partners channel their contributions to support activities on a particular theme UNDP has thematic funds for Crisis Prevention and Recovery Environment Democratic Governance Poverty Reduction Gender and Information Communication and Technology In 2014 contributions to thematic funds were $119 million or 3 of total contributions

0

$30M

$60M

$90M

$120M

$150M

Poverty Reduction

Information Communication and Technology

Gender

Environment

Democratic Governance

Crisis Prevention and Recovery

20142013201220112010

THEMATIC TRUST FUND CONTRIBUTIONS 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 19

TOP CONTRIBUTORS TO THEMATIC FUNDS

NEW THEMATIC WINDOWS

UNDP is streamlining its thematic funding ldquowindowsrdquo to better respond to countriesrsquo needs and ensure that development funds are utilized more effectively and efficiently through improved management arrangements and results reporting

The new thematic windows to be operational in 2016 are in line with the objectives of the Strategic Plan and provide a vehicle for minimally earmarked contributions to be allocated to address priority needs and deliver quality results

GOVERNANCE AND PEACEBUILDING

bull Democratic Governancebull Conict Preventionbull HIVHealth and Development

POVERTY ERADICATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

bull Environment Mainstreamingbull Gender Empowerment and Equality

CLIMATE CHANGE AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION

bull Climate Changebull Disaster Risk Reduction

CRISIS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

bull Immediate Response to Crisisbull Crisis Recovery

INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING

0 $5M $10M $15M $20M $25M $30M

United States

Australia

Finland

Luxembourg

Sweden

Switzerland

Denmark

Norway

United Kingdom

Netherlands

Germany $291M

$244M

$148M

$119M

$79M

$63M

$62M

$45M

$42M

$36M

$18M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 20

VERTICAL FUNDS

Vertical funds are created in response to single-issue advocacy campaigns and to tackle specific development issues They are governed by Steering Committees which decide on funding portfolios and allocation criteria and are assisted by independent Secretariats

Of the vertical funds UNDP engages with the Global Fund is the largest followed by the Global Environmental Facility and the Montreal Protocol

GLOBAL FUND

UNDP has partnered with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria since 2003 supporting pro-grammes in countries with limited ability to receive and manage this kind of fund

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY

As a Global Environmental Facility (GEF) implementing agency since 1992 UNDP supports countries to secure GEF resources and to meet global environmental obligations UNDP offers integrated technical services for countries including assistance on eligibility assessment programme formulation mobilization of co-financing implementation oversight and knowledge and results management

MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL

UNDP as an implementing agency of the Multilateral Fund supports investment projects demonstration projects that test approaches to development challenges and provides technical assistance and feasibility studies

Montreal Protocol($25M)

Global Fund($412M)

GEF($301M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 21

GREEN CLIMATE FUND

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a new fund created under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) aimed at combatting urgent and serious effects of climate change It is designed to support developing countries move towards low-emission and climate-resilient development

The GCF Board has approved UNDP as the first UN agency that will be able to access the Fundrsquos resources for devel-oping countries alongside six other entities from the public and private sector

The accreditation by GCF is a significant step allowing UNDP to continue its leadership role in scaling up climate change mitigation and adaptation for sustainable development

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 22

UN POOLED FUNDS

Pooled fundingmdashmulti-donor trust funds (MDTFs) and joint programmesmdashis a mechanism for combining resources from multiple development partners and allocating such resources to multiple implementing entities to support specific national regional or global priorities

UNDP hosts the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO) established in 2003 to facilitate coordinated action through-out the UN system It achieves this in part by designing and administering pooled financing instruments that are efficient accountable and transparent As the appointed fund administrator administrative agent the MPTFO helps design funds and channel contributions from a large number of contributors

EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT POOLED FUND FUNCTIONS AND ADDED VALUE

MAIN FUNCTION OF THE FUND MAIN ADDED VALUE OF THE FUND

COHERENCEFills critical gaps and under-financed priorities to ensure a coherent and sequenced response in line with a strategic framework

CONSOLIDATIONReduces fragmentation with respect to particular priorities In many cases is the largest investment vehicle

SPECIALIZED OR THEMATIC

Has a specific expertise and focus on a particular thematic issue Usually the case for global funds

RISK MANAGEMENTReduces risks to governments and financial contributors through a comprehensive risk and result-based management system

INNOVATIONProvides a mechanism for clear attribution and transparency from innovative sources of finance Can also deepen national financing systems

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL OTHER RESOURCES 15

OTHER RESOURCESOther resources range from lightly earmarked funds such as in the case of thematic funds to funds highly earmarked to specific programmes and projects Funds can be earmarked at the global regional country and most commonly project levels UN pooled funds and vertical funds are also earmarked for specific purposes

Funds earmarked to specific programmes and projects are received by UNDP either through a co-financing modality called ldquocost-sharingrdquo or in the form of trust funds The table below shows the top government contributors to other resources in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Chile

Uruguay

Armenia

China

Panama

Turkey

Republic of Korea

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Canada

Finland

Australia

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Denmark

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Switzerland

Brazil

Netherlands

Sweden

Peru

Norway

United Kingdom

Germany

Argentina

Japan

United States $4179M

$3046M

$1981M

$1252M

$927M

$910M

$885M

$875M

$675M

$613M

$552M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$353M

$352M

$296M

$250M

$230M

$229M

$217M

$209M

$202M

$185M

$183M

$151M

$143M

$136M

$130M

$123M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL DOMESTIC RESOURCES 16

DOMESTIC RESOURCESDomestic resources are funds earmarked to programmes and projects They are contributions channelled through UNDP by governments from their domestic resources through a modality known as ldquogovernment cost-sharingrdquo

The chart below ranks countriesrsquo domestic contributions through government cost-sharing (GCS) in terms of volume It does not reflect the relative importance of GCS to these countries as a proportion of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Some countries contribute a greater percentage of their GDPs towards GCS even if the volume of their contributions is smaller

For example Sao Tome and Principe contributed approximately 017 of its GDP towards GCS Similarly Guinea-Bis-sau Timor-Leste Benin and Chad contributed 009 006 005 and 005 respectively of their GDP towards GCS With a total of $851 million contributed in 2014 an increasing number of programme countries like Senegal are channelling their domestic resources towards a UNDP programme or project in support of their national priorities

0 $50M $100M $150M $200M

Equatorial Guinea

Kazakhstan

Macedonia former Yugoslav Rep

Guatemala

Serbia

Guyana

Azerbaijan

Honduras

Chad

Mexico

United Republic of Tanzania

Nigeria

India

Turkey

Morocco

Chile

China

Uruguay

Dominican Republic

Armenia

Panama

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Colombia

Egypt

Venezuela

Brazil

Peru

Argentina $1978M

$852M

$601M

$532M

$476M

$441M

$350M

$296M

$217M

$213M

$162M

$151M

$136M

$122M

$121M

$120M

$113M

$104M

$102M

$90M

$87M

$76M

$76M

$67M

$66M

$63M

$63M

$62M

$57M

$48M

$44M

$43M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL SENEGAL INVESTS USD 198 MILLION TO BOOST RURAL DEVELOPMENT 17

Senegal invests USD 198 million to boost rural developmentSenegal has initiated a vast local development programme to increase living standards across the countryside while at the same time stimulating the national economy

The initiative to be implemented by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) will accelerate the construction of roads and water points invest in agriculture and entrepreneurship and facilitate peoplersquos access to energy services

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 18

THEMATIC FUNDS

With thematic funds partners channel their contributions to support activities on a particular theme UNDP has thematic funds for Crisis Prevention and Recovery Environment Democratic Governance Poverty Reduction Gender and Information Communication and Technology In 2014 contributions to thematic funds were $119 million or 3 of total contributions

0

$30M

$60M

$90M

$120M

$150M

Poverty Reduction

Information Communication and Technology

Gender

Environment

Democratic Governance

Crisis Prevention and Recovery

20142013201220112010

THEMATIC TRUST FUND CONTRIBUTIONS 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 19

TOP CONTRIBUTORS TO THEMATIC FUNDS

NEW THEMATIC WINDOWS

UNDP is streamlining its thematic funding ldquowindowsrdquo to better respond to countriesrsquo needs and ensure that development funds are utilized more effectively and efficiently through improved management arrangements and results reporting

The new thematic windows to be operational in 2016 are in line with the objectives of the Strategic Plan and provide a vehicle for minimally earmarked contributions to be allocated to address priority needs and deliver quality results

GOVERNANCE AND PEACEBUILDING

bull Democratic Governancebull Conict Preventionbull HIVHealth and Development

POVERTY ERADICATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

bull Environment Mainstreamingbull Gender Empowerment and Equality

CLIMATE CHANGE AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION

bull Climate Changebull Disaster Risk Reduction

CRISIS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

bull Immediate Response to Crisisbull Crisis Recovery

INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING

0 $5M $10M $15M $20M $25M $30M

United States

Australia

Finland

Luxembourg

Sweden

Switzerland

Denmark

Norway

United Kingdom

Netherlands

Germany $291M

$244M

$148M

$119M

$79M

$63M

$62M

$45M

$42M

$36M

$18M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 20

VERTICAL FUNDS

Vertical funds are created in response to single-issue advocacy campaigns and to tackle specific development issues They are governed by Steering Committees which decide on funding portfolios and allocation criteria and are assisted by independent Secretariats

Of the vertical funds UNDP engages with the Global Fund is the largest followed by the Global Environmental Facility and the Montreal Protocol

GLOBAL FUND

UNDP has partnered with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria since 2003 supporting pro-grammes in countries with limited ability to receive and manage this kind of fund

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY

As a Global Environmental Facility (GEF) implementing agency since 1992 UNDP supports countries to secure GEF resources and to meet global environmental obligations UNDP offers integrated technical services for countries including assistance on eligibility assessment programme formulation mobilization of co-financing implementation oversight and knowledge and results management

MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL

UNDP as an implementing agency of the Multilateral Fund supports investment projects demonstration projects that test approaches to development challenges and provides technical assistance and feasibility studies

Montreal Protocol($25M)

Global Fund($412M)

GEF($301M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 21

GREEN CLIMATE FUND

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a new fund created under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) aimed at combatting urgent and serious effects of climate change It is designed to support developing countries move towards low-emission and climate-resilient development

The GCF Board has approved UNDP as the first UN agency that will be able to access the Fundrsquos resources for devel-oping countries alongside six other entities from the public and private sector

The accreditation by GCF is a significant step allowing UNDP to continue its leadership role in scaling up climate change mitigation and adaptation for sustainable development

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 22

UN POOLED FUNDS

Pooled fundingmdashmulti-donor trust funds (MDTFs) and joint programmesmdashis a mechanism for combining resources from multiple development partners and allocating such resources to multiple implementing entities to support specific national regional or global priorities

UNDP hosts the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO) established in 2003 to facilitate coordinated action through-out the UN system It achieves this in part by designing and administering pooled financing instruments that are efficient accountable and transparent As the appointed fund administrator administrative agent the MPTFO helps design funds and channel contributions from a large number of contributors

EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT POOLED FUND FUNCTIONS AND ADDED VALUE

MAIN FUNCTION OF THE FUND MAIN ADDED VALUE OF THE FUND

COHERENCEFills critical gaps and under-financed priorities to ensure a coherent and sequenced response in line with a strategic framework

CONSOLIDATIONReduces fragmentation with respect to particular priorities In many cases is the largest investment vehicle

SPECIALIZED OR THEMATIC

Has a specific expertise and focus on a particular thematic issue Usually the case for global funds

RISK MANAGEMENTReduces risks to governments and financial contributors through a comprehensive risk and result-based management system

INNOVATIONProvides a mechanism for clear attribution and transparency from innovative sources of finance Can also deepen national financing systems

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL DOMESTIC RESOURCES 16

DOMESTIC RESOURCESDomestic resources are funds earmarked to programmes and projects They are contributions channelled through UNDP by governments from their domestic resources through a modality known as ldquogovernment cost-sharingrdquo

The chart below ranks countriesrsquo domestic contributions through government cost-sharing (GCS) in terms of volume It does not reflect the relative importance of GCS to these countries as a proportion of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Some countries contribute a greater percentage of their GDPs towards GCS even if the volume of their contributions is smaller

For example Sao Tome and Principe contributed approximately 017 of its GDP towards GCS Similarly Guinea-Bis-sau Timor-Leste Benin and Chad contributed 009 006 005 and 005 respectively of their GDP towards GCS With a total of $851 million contributed in 2014 an increasing number of programme countries like Senegal are channelling their domestic resources towards a UNDP programme or project in support of their national priorities

0 $50M $100M $150M $200M

Equatorial Guinea

Kazakhstan

Macedonia former Yugoslav Rep

Guatemala

Serbia

Guyana

Azerbaijan

Honduras

Chad

Mexico

United Republic of Tanzania

Nigeria

India

Turkey

Morocco

Chile

China

Uruguay

Dominican Republic

Armenia

Panama

Kuwait

Lebanon

Paraguay

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Colombia

Egypt

Venezuela

Brazil

Peru

Argentina $1978M

$852M

$601M

$532M

$476M

$441M

$350M

$296M

$217M

$213M

$162M

$151M

$136M

$122M

$121M

$120M

$113M

$104M

$102M

$90M

$87M

$76M

$76M

$67M

$66M

$63M

$63M

$62M

$57M

$48M

$44M

$43M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL SENEGAL INVESTS USD 198 MILLION TO BOOST RURAL DEVELOPMENT 17

Senegal invests USD 198 million to boost rural developmentSenegal has initiated a vast local development programme to increase living standards across the countryside while at the same time stimulating the national economy

The initiative to be implemented by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) will accelerate the construction of roads and water points invest in agriculture and entrepreneurship and facilitate peoplersquos access to energy services

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 18

THEMATIC FUNDS

With thematic funds partners channel their contributions to support activities on a particular theme UNDP has thematic funds for Crisis Prevention and Recovery Environment Democratic Governance Poverty Reduction Gender and Information Communication and Technology In 2014 contributions to thematic funds were $119 million or 3 of total contributions

0

$30M

$60M

$90M

$120M

$150M

Poverty Reduction

Information Communication and Technology

Gender

Environment

Democratic Governance

Crisis Prevention and Recovery

20142013201220112010

THEMATIC TRUST FUND CONTRIBUTIONS 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 19

TOP CONTRIBUTORS TO THEMATIC FUNDS

NEW THEMATIC WINDOWS

UNDP is streamlining its thematic funding ldquowindowsrdquo to better respond to countriesrsquo needs and ensure that development funds are utilized more effectively and efficiently through improved management arrangements and results reporting

The new thematic windows to be operational in 2016 are in line with the objectives of the Strategic Plan and provide a vehicle for minimally earmarked contributions to be allocated to address priority needs and deliver quality results

GOVERNANCE AND PEACEBUILDING

bull Democratic Governancebull Conict Preventionbull HIVHealth and Development

POVERTY ERADICATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

bull Environment Mainstreamingbull Gender Empowerment and Equality

CLIMATE CHANGE AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION

bull Climate Changebull Disaster Risk Reduction

CRISIS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

bull Immediate Response to Crisisbull Crisis Recovery

INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING

0 $5M $10M $15M $20M $25M $30M

United States

Australia

Finland

Luxembourg

Sweden

Switzerland

Denmark

Norway

United Kingdom

Netherlands

Germany $291M

$244M

$148M

$119M

$79M

$63M

$62M

$45M

$42M

$36M

$18M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 20

VERTICAL FUNDS

Vertical funds are created in response to single-issue advocacy campaigns and to tackle specific development issues They are governed by Steering Committees which decide on funding portfolios and allocation criteria and are assisted by independent Secretariats

Of the vertical funds UNDP engages with the Global Fund is the largest followed by the Global Environmental Facility and the Montreal Protocol

GLOBAL FUND

UNDP has partnered with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria since 2003 supporting pro-grammes in countries with limited ability to receive and manage this kind of fund

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY

As a Global Environmental Facility (GEF) implementing agency since 1992 UNDP supports countries to secure GEF resources and to meet global environmental obligations UNDP offers integrated technical services for countries including assistance on eligibility assessment programme formulation mobilization of co-financing implementation oversight and knowledge and results management

MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL

UNDP as an implementing agency of the Multilateral Fund supports investment projects demonstration projects that test approaches to development challenges and provides technical assistance and feasibility studies

Montreal Protocol($25M)

Global Fund($412M)

GEF($301M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 21

GREEN CLIMATE FUND

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a new fund created under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) aimed at combatting urgent and serious effects of climate change It is designed to support developing countries move towards low-emission and climate-resilient development

The GCF Board has approved UNDP as the first UN agency that will be able to access the Fundrsquos resources for devel-oping countries alongside six other entities from the public and private sector

The accreditation by GCF is a significant step allowing UNDP to continue its leadership role in scaling up climate change mitigation and adaptation for sustainable development

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 22

UN POOLED FUNDS

Pooled fundingmdashmulti-donor trust funds (MDTFs) and joint programmesmdashis a mechanism for combining resources from multiple development partners and allocating such resources to multiple implementing entities to support specific national regional or global priorities

UNDP hosts the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO) established in 2003 to facilitate coordinated action through-out the UN system It achieves this in part by designing and administering pooled financing instruments that are efficient accountable and transparent As the appointed fund administrator administrative agent the MPTFO helps design funds and channel contributions from a large number of contributors

EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT POOLED FUND FUNCTIONS AND ADDED VALUE

MAIN FUNCTION OF THE FUND MAIN ADDED VALUE OF THE FUND

COHERENCEFills critical gaps and under-financed priorities to ensure a coherent and sequenced response in line with a strategic framework

CONSOLIDATIONReduces fragmentation with respect to particular priorities In many cases is the largest investment vehicle

SPECIALIZED OR THEMATIC

Has a specific expertise and focus on a particular thematic issue Usually the case for global funds

RISK MANAGEMENTReduces risks to governments and financial contributors through a comprehensive risk and result-based management system

INNOVATIONProvides a mechanism for clear attribution and transparency from innovative sources of finance Can also deepen national financing systems

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL SENEGAL INVESTS USD 198 MILLION TO BOOST RURAL DEVELOPMENT 17

Senegal invests USD 198 million to boost rural developmentSenegal has initiated a vast local development programme to increase living standards across the countryside while at the same time stimulating the national economy

The initiative to be implemented by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) will accelerate the construction of roads and water points invest in agriculture and entrepreneurship and facilitate peoplersquos access to energy services

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 18

THEMATIC FUNDS

With thematic funds partners channel their contributions to support activities on a particular theme UNDP has thematic funds for Crisis Prevention and Recovery Environment Democratic Governance Poverty Reduction Gender and Information Communication and Technology In 2014 contributions to thematic funds were $119 million or 3 of total contributions

0

$30M

$60M

$90M

$120M

$150M

Poverty Reduction

Information Communication and Technology

Gender

Environment

Democratic Governance

Crisis Prevention and Recovery

20142013201220112010

THEMATIC TRUST FUND CONTRIBUTIONS 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 19

TOP CONTRIBUTORS TO THEMATIC FUNDS

NEW THEMATIC WINDOWS

UNDP is streamlining its thematic funding ldquowindowsrdquo to better respond to countriesrsquo needs and ensure that development funds are utilized more effectively and efficiently through improved management arrangements and results reporting

The new thematic windows to be operational in 2016 are in line with the objectives of the Strategic Plan and provide a vehicle for minimally earmarked contributions to be allocated to address priority needs and deliver quality results

GOVERNANCE AND PEACEBUILDING

bull Democratic Governancebull Conict Preventionbull HIVHealth and Development

POVERTY ERADICATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

bull Environment Mainstreamingbull Gender Empowerment and Equality

CLIMATE CHANGE AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION

bull Climate Changebull Disaster Risk Reduction

CRISIS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

bull Immediate Response to Crisisbull Crisis Recovery

INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING

0 $5M $10M $15M $20M $25M $30M

United States

Australia

Finland

Luxembourg

Sweden

Switzerland

Denmark

Norway

United Kingdom

Netherlands

Germany $291M

$244M

$148M

$119M

$79M

$63M

$62M

$45M

$42M

$36M

$18M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 20

VERTICAL FUNDS

Vertical funds are created in response to single-issue advocacy campaigns and to tackle specific development issues They are governed by Steering Committees which decide on funding portfolios and allocation criteria and are assisted by independent Secretariats

Of the vertical funds UNDP engages with the Global Fund is the largest followed by the Global Environmental Facility and the Montreal Protocol

GLOBAL FUND

UNDP has partnered with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria since 2003 supporting pro-grammes in countries with limited ability to receive and manage this kind of fund

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY

As a Global Environmental Facility (GEF) implementing agency since 1992 UNDP supports countries to secure GEF resources and to meet global environmental obligations UNDP offers integrated technical services for countries including assistance on eligibility assessment programme formulation mobilization of co-financing implementation oversight and knowledge and results management

MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL

UNDP as an implementing agency of the Multilateral Fund supports investment projects demonstration projects that test approaches to development challenges and provides technical assistance and feasibility studies

Montreal Protocol($25M)

Global Fund($412M)

GEF($301M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 21

GREEN CLIMATE FUND

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a new fund created under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) aimed at combatting urgent and serious effects of climate change It is designed to support developing countries move towards low-emission and climate-resilient development

The GCF Board has approved UNDP as the first UN agency that will be able to access the Fundrsquos resources for devel-oping countries alongside six other entities from the public and private sector

The accreditation by GCF is a significant step allowing UNDP to continue its leadership role in scaling up climate change mitigation and adaptation for sustainable development

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 22

UN POOLED FUNDS

Pooled fundingmdashmulti-donor trust funds (MDTFs) and joint programmesmdashis a mechanism for combining resources from multiple development partners and allocating such resources to multiple implementing entities to support specific national regional or global priorities

UNDP hosts the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO) established in 2003 to facilitate coordinated action through-out the UN system It achieves this in part by designing and administering pooled financing instruments that are efficient accountable and transparent As the appointed fund administrator administrative agent the MPTFO helps design funds and channel contributions from a large number of contributors

EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT POOLED FUND FUNCTIONS AND ADDED VALUE

MAIN FUNCTION OF THE FUND MAIN ADDED VALUE OF THE FUND

COHERENCEFills critical gaps and under-financed priorities to ensure a coherent and sequenced response in line with a strategic framework

CONSOLIDATIONReduces fragmentation with respect to particular priorities In many cases is the largest investment vehicle

SPECIALIZED OR THEMATIC

Has a specific expertise and focus on a particular thematic issue Usually the case for global funds

RISK MANAGEMENTReduces risks to governments and financial contributors through a comprehensive risk and result-based management system

INNOVATIONProvides a mechanism for clear attribution and transparency from innovative sources of finance Can also deepen national financing systems

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 18

THEMATIC FUNDS

With thematic funds partners channel their contributions to support activities on a particular theme UNDP has thematic funds for Crisis Prevention and Recovery Environment Democratic Governance Poverty Reduction Gender and Information Communication and Technology In 2014 contributions to thematic funds were $119 million or 3 of total contributions

0

$30M

$60M

$90M

$120M

$150M

Poverty Reduction

Information Communication and Technology

Gender

Environment

Democratic Governance

Crisis Prevention and Recovery

20142013201220112010

THEMATIC TRUST FUND CONTRIBUTIONS 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 19

TOP CONTRIBUTORS TO THEMATIC FUNDS

NEW THEMATIC WINDOWS

UNDP is streamlining its thematic funding ldquowindowsrdquo to better respond to countriesrsquo needs and ensure that development funds are utilized more effectively and efficiently through improved management arrangements and results reporting

The new thematic windows to be operational in 2016 are in line with the objectives of the Strategic Plan and provide a vehicle for minimally earmarked contributions to be allocated to address priority needs and deliver quality results

GOVERNANCE AND PEACEBUILDING

bull Democratic Governancebull Conict Preventionbull HIVHealth and Development

POVERTY ERADICATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

bull Environment Mainstreamingbull Gender Empowerment and Equality

CLIMATE CHANGE AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION

bull Climate Changebull Disaster Risk Reduction

CRISIS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

bull Immediate Response to Crisisbull Crisis Recovery

INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING

0 $5M $10M $15M $20M $25M $30M

United States

Australia

Finland

Luxembourg

Sweden

Switzerland

Denmark

Norway

United Kingdom

Netherlands

Germany $291M

$244M

$148M

$119M

$79M

$63M

$62M

$45M

$42M

$36M

$18M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 20

VERTICAL FUNDS

Vertical funds are created in response to single-issue advocacy campaigns and to tackle specific development issues They are governed by Steering Committees which decide on funding portfolios and allocation criteria and are assisted by independent Secretariats

Of the vertical funds UNDP engages with the Global Fund is the largest followed by the Global Environmental Facility and the Montreal Protocol

GLOBAL FUND

UNDP has partnered with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria since 2003 supporting pro-grammes in countries with limited ability to receive and manage this kind of fund

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY

As a Global Environmental Facility (GEF) implementing agency since 1992 UNDP supports countries to secure GEF resources and to meet global environmental obligations UNDP offers integrated technical services for countries including assistance on eligibility assessment programme formulation mobilization of co-financing implementation oversight and knowledge and results management

MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL

UNDP as an implementing agency of the Multilateral Fund supports investment projects demonstration projects that test approaches to development challenges and provides technical assistance and feasibility studies

Montreal Protocol($25M)

Global Fund($412M)

GEF($301M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 21

GREEN CLIMATE FUND

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a new fund created under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) aimed at combatting urgent and serious effects of climate change It is designed to support developing countries move towards low-emission and climate-resilient development

The GCF Board has approved UNDP as the first UN agency that will be able to access the Fundrsquos resources for devel-oping countries alongside six other entities from the public and private sector

The accreditation by GCF is a significant step allowing UNDP to continue its leadership role in scaling up climate change mitigation and adaptation for sustainable development

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 22

UN POOLED FUNDS

Pooled fundingmdashmulti-donor trust funds (MDTFs) and joint programmesmdashis a mechanism for combining resources from multiple development partners and allocating such resources to multiple implementing entities to support specific national regional or global priorities

UNDP hosts the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO) established in 2003 to facilitate coordinated action through-out the UN system It achieves this in part by designing and administering pooled financing instruments that are efficient accountable and transparent As the appointed fund administrator administrative agent the MPTFO helps design funds and channel contributions from a large number of contributors

EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT POOLED FUND FUNCTIONS AND ADDED VALUE

MAIN FUNCTION OF THE FUND MAIN ADDED VALUE OF THE FUND

COHERENCEFills critical gaps and under-financed priorities to ensure a coherent and sequenced response in line with a strategic framework

CONSOLIDATIONReduces fragmentation with respect to particular priorities In many cases is the largest investment vehicle

SPECIALIZED OR THEMATIC

Has a specific expertise and focus on a particular thematic issue Usually the case for global funds

RISK MANAGEMENTReduces risks to governments and financial contributors through a comprehensive risk and result-based management system

INNOVATIONProvides a mechanism for clear attribution and transparency from innovative sources of finance Can also deepen national financing systems

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL THEMATIC FUNDS 19

TOP CONTRIBUTORS TO THEMATIC FUNDS

NEW THEMATIC WINDOWS

UNDP is streamlining its thematic funding ldquowindowsrdquo to better respond to countriesrsquo needs and ensure that development funds are utilized more effectively and efficiently through improved management arrangements and results reporting

The new thematic windows to be operational in 2016 are in line with the objectives of the Strategic Plan and provide a vehicle for minimally earmarked contributions to be allocated to address priority needs and deliver quality results

GOVERNANCE AND PEACEBUILDING

bull Democratic Governancebull Conict Preventionbull HIVHealth and Development

POVERTY ERADICATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

bull Environment Mainstreamingbull Gender Empowerment and Equality

CLIMATE CHANGE AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION

bull Climate Changebull Disaster Risk Reduction

CRISIS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

bull Immediate Response to Crisisbull Crisis Recovery

INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING

0 $5M $10M $15M $20M $25M $30M

United States

Australia

Finland

Luxembourg

Sweden

Switzerland

Denmark

Norway

United Kingdom

Netherlands

Germany $291M

$244M

$148M

$119M

$79M

$63M

$62M

$45M

$42M

$36M

$18M

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 20

VERTICAL FUNDS

Vertical funds are created in response to single-issue advocacy campaigns and to tackle specific development issues They are governed by Steering Committees which decide on funding portfolios and allocation criteria and are assisted by independent Secretariats

Of the vertical funds UNDP engages with the Global Fund is the largest followed by the Global Environmental Facility and the Montreal Protocol

GLOBAL FUND

UNDP has partnered with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria since 2003 supporting pro-grammes in countries with limited ability to receive and manage this kind of fund

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY

As a Global Environmental Facility (GEF) implementing agency since 1992 UNDP supports countries to secure GEF resources and to meet global environmental obligations UNDP offers integrated technical services for countries including assistance on eligibility assessment programme formulation mobilization of co-financing implementation oversight and knowledge and results management

MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL

UNDP as an implementing agency of the Multilateral Fund supports investment projects demonstration projects that test approaches to development challenges and provides technical assistance and feasibility studies

Montreal Protocol($25M)

Global Fund($412M)

GEF($301M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 21

GREEN CLIMATE FUND

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a new fund created under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) aimed at combatting urgent and serious effects of climate change It is designed to support developing countries move towards low-emission and climate-resilient development

The GCF Board has approved UNDP as the first UN agency that will be able to access the Fundrsquos resources for devel-oping countries alongside six other entities from the public and private sector

The accreditation by GCF is a significant step allowing UNDP to continue its leadership role in scaling up climate change mitigation and adaptation for sustainable development

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 22

UN POOLED FUNDS

Pooled fundingmdashmulti-donor trust funds (MDTFs) and joint programmesmdashis a mechanism for combining resources from multiple development partners and allocating such resources to multiple implementing entities to support specific national regional or global priorities

UNDP hosts the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO) established in 2003 to facilitate coordinated action through-out the UN system It achieves this in part by designing and administering pooled financing instruments that are efficient accountable and transparent As the appointed fund administrator administrative agent the MPTFO helps design funds and channel contributions from a large number of contributors

EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT POOLED FUND FUNCTIONS AND ADDED VALUE

MAIN FUNCTION OF THE FUND MAIN ADDED VALUE OF THE FUND

COHERENCEFills critical gaps and under-financed priorities to ensure a coherent and sequenced response in line with a strategic framework

CONSOLIDATIONReduces fragmentation with respect to particular priorities In many cases is the largest investment vehicle

SPECIALIZED OR THEMATIC

Has a specific expertise and focus on a particular thematic issue Usually the case for global funds

RISK MANAGEMENTReduces risks to governments and financial contributors through a comprehensive risk and result-based management system

INNOVATIONProvides a mechanism for clear attribution and transparency from innovative sources of finance Can also deepen national financing systems

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 20

VERTICAL FUNDS

Vertical funds are created in response to single-issue advocacy campaigns and to tackle specific development issues They are governed by Steering Committees which decide on funding portfolios and allocation criteria and are assisted by independent Secretariats

Of the vertical funds UNDP engages with the Global Fund is the largest followed by the Global Environmental Facility and the Montreal Protocol

GLOBAL FUND

UNDP has partnered with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria since 2003 supporting pro-grammes in countries with limited ability to receive and manage this kind of fund

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITY

As a Global Environmental Facility (GEF) implementing agency since 1992 UNDP supports countries to secure GEF resources and to meet global environmental obligations UNDP offers integrated technical services for countries including assistance on eligibility assessment programme formulation mobilization of co-financing implementation oversight and knowledge and results management

MULTILATERAL FUND FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL

UNDP as an implementing agency of the Multilateral Fund supports investment projects demonstration projects that test approaches to development challenges and provides technical assistance and feasibility studies

Montreal Protocol($25M)

Global Fund($412M)

GEF($301M)

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 21

GREEN CLIMATE FUND

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a new fund created under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) aimed at combatting urgent and serious effects of climate change It is designed to support developing countries move towards low-emission and climate-resilient development

The GCF Board has approved UNDP as the first UN agency that will be able to access the Fundrsquos resources for devel-oping countries alongside six other entities from the public and private sector

The accreditation by GCF is a significant step allowing UNDP to continue its leadership role in scaling up climate change mitigation and adaptation for sustainable development

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 22

UN POOLED FUNDS

Pooled fundingmdashmulti-donor trust funds (MDTFs) and joint programmesmdashis a mechanism for combining resources from multiple development partners and allocating such resources to multiple implementing entities to support specific national regional or global priorities

UNDP hosts the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO) established in 2003 to facilitate coordinated action through-out the UN system It achieves this in part by designing and administering pooled financing instruments that are efficient accountable and transparent As the appointed fund administrator administrative agent the MPTFO helps design funds and channel contributions from a large number of contributors

EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT POOLED FUND FUNCTIONS AND ADDED VALUE

MAIN FUNCTION OF THE FUND MAIN ADDED VALUE OF THE FUND

COHERENCEFills critical gaps and under-financed priorities to ensure a coherent and sequenced response in line with a strategic framework

CONSOLIDATIONReduces fragmentation with respect to particular priorities In many cases is the largest investment vehicle

SPECIALIZED OR THEMATIC

Has a specific expertise and focus on a particular thematic issue Usually the case for global funds

RISK MANAGEMENTReduces risks to governments and financial contributors through a comprehensive risk and result-based management system

INNOVATIONProvides a mechanism for clear attribution and transparency from innovative sources of finance Can also deepen national financing systems

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL VERTICAL FUNDS 21

GREEN CLIMATE FUND

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a new fund created under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) aimed at combatting urgent and serious effects of climate change It is designed to support developing countries move towards low-emission and climate-resilient development

The GCF Board has approved UNDP as the first UN agency that will be able to access the Fundrsquos resources for devel-oping countries alongside six other entities from the public and private sector

The accreditation by GCF is a significant step allowing UNDP to continue its leadership role in scaling up climate change mitigation and adaptation for sustainable development

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 22

UN POOLED FUNDS

Pooled fundingmdashmulti-donor trust funds (MDTFs) and joint programmesmdashis a mechanism for combining resources from multiple development partners and allocating such resources to multiple implementing entities to support specific national regional or global priorities

UNDP hosts the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO) established in 2003 to facilitate coordinated action through-out the UN system It achieves this in part by designing and administering pooled financing instruments that are efficient accountable and transparent As the appointed fund administrator administrative agent the MPTFO helps design funds and channel contributions from a large number of contributors

EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT POOLED FUND FUNCTIONS AND ADDED VALUE

MAIN FUNCTION OF THE FUND MAIN ADDED VALUE OF THE FUND

COHERENCEFills critical gaps and under-financed priorities to ensure a coherent and sequenced response in line with a strategic framework

CONSOLIDATIONReduces fragmentation with respect to particular priorities In many cases is the largest investment vehicle

SPECIALIZED OR THEMATIC

Has a specific expertise and focus on a particular thematic issue Usually the case for global funds

RISK MANAGEMENTReduces risks to governments and financial contributors through a comprehensive risk and result-based management system

INNOVATIONProvides a mechanism for clear attribution and transparency from innovative sources of finance Can also deepen national financing systems

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 22

UN POOLED FUNDS

Pooled fundingmdashmulti-donor trust funds (MDTFs) and joint programmesmdashis a mechanism for combining resources from multiple development partners and allocating such resources to multiple implementing entities to support specific national regional or global priorities

UNDP hosts the Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (MPTFO) established in 2003 to facilitate coordinated action through-out the UN system It achieves this in part by designing and administering pooled financing instruments that are efficient accountable and transparent As the appointed fund administrator administrative agent the MPTFO helps design funds and channel contributions from a large number of contributors

EXAMPLES OF THE DIFFERENT POOLED FUND FUNCTIONS AND ADDED VALUE

MAIN FUNCTION OF THE FUND MAIN ADDED VALUE OF THE FUND

COHERENCEFills critical gaps and under-financed priorities to ensure a coherent and sequenced response in line with a strategic framework

CONSOLIDATIONReduces fragmentation with respect to particular priorities In many cases is the largest investment vehicle

SPECIALIZED OR THEMATIC

Has a specific expertise and focus on a particular thematic issue Usually the case for global funds

RISK MANAGEMENTReduces risks to governments and financial contributors through a comprehensive risk and result-based management system

INNOVATIONProvides a mechanism for clear attribution and transparency from innovative sources of finance Can also deepen national financing systems

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY FUNDING CHANNEL UN POOLED FUNDS 23

LARGEST POOLED FUNDS ADMINISTERED BY UNDP AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

TOP 15 UN POOLED FUNDS IMPLEMENTED BY UNDP AS A PARTICIPATING UN ORGANIZATION

In 2014 UNDP received contributions of $273 million through pooled funds The table below shows pooled funds in which UNDP is a participating organization Aside from implementing programmes and projects UNDP also acts as Managing Agent for Common Humanitarian Funds (CHFs) by contracting monitoring and evaluating humanitarian NGOs as approved by the Humanitarian Coordinator

As Administrative and Fiscal Agent in 2014 the MPTFO received deposits of $906 million and made transfers of $842 million to participating organizations The chart below shows the largest pooled funds managed by UNDP as adminis-trative agent

0 $30M $60M $90M $120M $150M

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund

Afghanistan CHF

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

Ebola Response MPTF

South Sudan CHF $1294M

$1259M

$783M

$590M

$521M

$467M

$421M

$384M

$296M

$285M

0 $10M $20M $30M $40M $50M $60M $70M $80M

UN Action Against Sexual Violence

Darfur Peace amp Stability Fund

Rwanda One UN Fund

Iraq UNDAF Trust Fund

UN REDD Viet Nam Phase II MPTF

Lebanon Recovery Fund

JP Somalia Loc Gov amp Decentral

Ebola Response MPTF

Tanzania One UN Fund

UN REDD Programme Fund

DRC Pooled Fund

CAR Common Humanitarian Fund

Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund

Peacebuilding Fund

South Sudan CHF $742M

$325M

$247M

$243M

$146M

$134M

$111M

$109M

$62M

$58M

$58M

$46M

$44M

$35M

$31M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 24

RESOURCES BY

PARTNER

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 25

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE TREND 2010-2014

RESOURCES BY PARTNER TYPE

In 2014 governments contributed $3089 billion or 66 of total contributions whereas $1626 billion or 34 was received from other partners

Contributions from bilateral partners constituted 46 of total contributions followed by 19 from domestic resourc-es 16 from vertical funds 8 from the European Union 6 from UN pooled funds and 5 from the private sector foundations international financing institutions (IFIs) UN agencies and other partners

Private Sector Financing Institutions Foundations and other multilaterals

Bilateral Partners($2184M)

Others($96M)

UN Agencies($119M)

Domestic Resources($905M)

European Union($392)

UN Pooled Funds($281M)

Vertical Funds($738M)

UN Pooled Funds

Others

UN Agencies

Vertical Funds

European Union

Domestic Resources

Bilateral Partners

0

$05B

$1B

$15B

$2B

$25B

$3B

20142013201220112010

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 26

The majority of UNDPrsquos funding continues to come from bilateral governments (mostly OECD-DAC members) followed by government domestic resources vertical funds (mainly the Global Fund and the Global Environment Facility) and the European Union

Although the amounts received from the private sector and foundations are a small part of UNDPrsquos budget these contributions go beyond their financial benefit Private sector companies and foundations contribute their expertise in economic development and provide access to knowledge technology and innovation

In 2014 UNDP received a total of $38 million from the private sector and foundations with the largest contribution coming from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ($97 million)

TOP 30 RESOURCE PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other Resources

France

Montreal Protocol

Republic of Korea

Other Multilaterals

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

UN Agencies

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

UN Pooled Funds

Global Environmental Facility

Japan

European Union

Global Fund

United States $4989M

$4122M

$3916M

$3850M

$3015M

$2808M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1189M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$298M

$248M

$247M

$219M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 27

The chart below shows total contributions from government partners including domestic resources channelled through UNDP

TOP 30 GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

Canadarsquos 2014 contribution was received in 2015 Excludes Australiarsquos 2013 contribution received in 2014

0 $100M $200M $300M $400M $500M

Regular Resources

Other ResourcesPanama

Ireland

China

Kuwait

Lebanon

Turkey

Paraguay

France

Republic of Korea

Belgium

Saudi Arabia

El Salvador

Australia

Egypt

Colombia

Venezuela

Finland

Canada

Brazil

Peru

Denmark

Netherlands

Switzerland

Germany

Sweden

United Kingdom

Argentina

Norway

Japan

United States $4989M

$3850M

$2032M

$1981M

$1830M

$1604M

$1543M

$1187M

$1042M

$955M

$885M

$613M

$584M

$533M

$532M

$478M

$476M

$431M

$352M

$316M

$306M

$248M

$219M

$217M

$213M

$209M

$207M

$181M

$168M

$153M

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below

RESOURCES BY PARTNER 28

Who we work with

African Development Bank Arab African International Bank Asian Development Bank

Banco Santander Bank Beirut and Arab Countries Banque Libano-Francaise Banco do

Nordeste Banco do Brasil Central American Bank for Economic Integration Corporacion Andina de Fomento Ecobank Ghana Erste amp Steiermarische Bank Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and

Development International Development Association Inter-American Development Bank International Finance Corporation International

Monetary Fund Islamic Development Bank Saudi Arabian British Bank World Bank Group

Africa

Angola Cameroon Comoros Congo Cote

drsquoIvoire Ethiopia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Lesotho Liberia Mali Mauritania Mozambique Sao Tome

and Principe South Africa South Sudan Tanzania

Zimbabwe

Latin America

Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Costa Rica

Ecuador Guatemala Guyana Haiti Nicaragua

Paraguay Suriname Venezuela

Europe and the Commonwealth of

Independent States

Croatia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russian

Federation TajikistanTurkey

Uzbekistan

Asia Pacic

Afghanistan Bangladesh India Indonesia Nepal Papua New Guinea Sri

Lanka Thailand

Arab States

Egypt Lebanon Programme for

Palestinian People Saudi Arabia Somalia Sudan

Yemen

In order to diversify its partnership and funding base UNDP launched a lsquo100 partnersrsquo campaign targeting to reach 100 Member States contributing to core resources by 2017 UNDP is also cultivating its relationship with international financing institutions (IFIs) foundations and the private sector through new engagement strate-gies and platforms for collaboration to implement the SDGs Although the volume of contributions received from IFIs in 2014 was low UNDP engages with a variety of financial institutions on national priorities around the world as shown below