ueda2011 hf to mi -d.samer sayed
-
Upload
ueda2015 -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
16 -
download
0
Transcript of ueda2011 hf to mi -d.samer sayed
1
From Myocardial Infarction to Heart Failure
And Use of ARBs
Prof Samir Abd Elkader
Professor of cardiology
Assuit University
2
Heart Failure is a Major and Growing Public Health Problem in the U.S.
Approximately 5 million patients in this country have HF
Over 550,000 patients are diagnosed with HF for the first time each year
Primary reason for 12 to 15 million office visits and 6.5 million hospital days each year
In 2001, nearly 53,000 patients died of HF as a primary cause
3
Heart Failure is Primarily a Condition of the Elderly
The incidence of HF approaches 10 per 1000 population after age 65
HF is the most common Medicare diagnosis-related group
More dollars are spent for the diagnosis and treatment of HF than any other diagnosis by Medicare
4
Definition of Heart Failure
HF is a complex clinical syndrome that canresult from any structural or functionalcardiac disorder that impairs the ability ofthe ventricle to fill with or eject blood.
5
“Heart Failure” vs. “Congestive Heart Failure”
Because not all patients have volume overload atthe time of initial or subsequent evaluation, theterm “heart failure” is preferred over the older term “congestive heart failure.”
7
Stages of Heart Failure
At Risk for Heart Failure:
STAGE A High risk for developing HF
STAGE B Asymptomatic LV dysfunction
Heart Failure:
STAGE C Past or current symptoms of HF
STAGE D End-stage HF
Adapted from Dzau V, Braunwald E. Am Heart J. 1991;121:1244-1263.
Risk factorsDiabetes, hypertension
Atherosclerosisand LVH
Myocardialinfarction
Remodeling Ventriculardilation
Heart failure
End-stageheart
disease
Death
The Cardiovascular Continuum
Effects of A II at ATEffects of A II at AT11 and AT and AT22 Receptors Receptors
Sensitive to blockade by ARBs
AT2AT1
VasoconstrictionAldosterone releaseOxidative stressVasopressin releaseSNS activationInhibits renin release Renal Na+ & H2O reabsorptionCell growth & proliferation
VasodilationAntiproliferationApoptosisAntidiuresis/antinatriuresisBradykinin productionNO release
Siragy H. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84:3S-8S.
*P <0.001 vs placebo.Adapted with permission from Biollaz J et al. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1982;4:966-972.
A II Escape With Long-Term ACE-I Therapy
Pla
sm
a A
CE,
nm
ol/
mL/m
in 100
80
60
40
200
** * * * * * *
30
20
10
0
Pla
sm
a A
II,
p
g/m
L
*
Placebo 4 h 24 h 1 2 3 4 5 6
Hospital Months
Plasma A II levels increased with time, although plasma-
converting enzyme activity remained suppressed
(n = 9 after 24 h)
5,010 HF patients>18 yr; EF <40%; NYHA II-
IV
906 deaths (events recorded)
Valsartan40 mg bid titrated to
160 mg bidPlacebo
Randomized to
Receiving usual therapy including ACEi, diuretics, digoxin, blockers (stratified randomization)
Cohn et al. J Card Fail 1999;5:155-160
Val-HeFT design: valsartan added to usual therapy for HF
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.6
13.2% risk reductionp= 0.009
Significant benefits on combined mortality / morbidity endpoint
0
Even
t-fre
e pr
obab
ility
Placebo
Valsartan
3 6 9 12 211815 24 27Time since randomization (months)
0.7
Cohn et al. NEJM 2001 345:1667
Reduction in Mortality with Valsartan (No ACEI Subgroup)
50
100
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30
Valsartan(N = 185)
Pro
po
rtio
n S
urv
ived
(%
)
P value (log-rank) = .017160
70
80
90
Placebo (N = 181)
Time Since Randomization (months)
Risk reduction= 33.1%
Hazard ratio (Cox model): 0.6694
(Adapted from Maggioni AP, et al. [abstract 839-5]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002)
Reduction in Combined Morbidity Endpoint* with Valsartan
(No ACEI Subgroup)E
ven
t-F
ree
Pro
bab
ility
Time Since Randomization (months)Hazard ratio (Cox model) : 0.560*First morbid event, including death or hospitalization
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30
P value (log-rank) = .0002
Valsartan(N = 185)
Placebo(N = 181)
Risk reduction = 44.0%
(Adapted from Maggioni AP, et al. [abstract 839-5]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002)
Val-HeFT impact on FDA
Valsartan is also approved by Egypt MOH for treatment of Heart Failure.
So, Valsatan is the first & ONLY ARB approved in HF
Adapted from Dzau V, Braunwald E. Am Heart J. 1991;121:1244-1263.
Risk factorsDiabetes, hypertension
Atherosclerosisand LVH
Myocardialinfarction
Remodeling Ventriculardilation
Heart failure
End-stageheart
disease
Death
From AMI to HF Valsartan has a definite role
with proven Cardiac Protection
Inhibition of theInhibition of the
ReninReninAngiotensin System Angiotensin System in Cardiovascular Disease in Cardiovascular Disease
Unacceptable High Mortality Rate from
Acute Heart Attack
1- Under utilization of drug treatment is a major
Factor in the unaccepted high Post- Heart Attack.
2-Many patients taking ACE inhibitors suffer intolerable side
Effects such as dry irritant cough &1stdose hypotension.
3-Proper Blockade of ACE & non ACE Pathways.
Rational
VALIANT : was designed as a mortality trial in high-risk MI patients (SAVE, AIRE, TRACE) who derived particular benefits from an ACE inhibitor.
To determine whether:
the ARB valsartan was superior to captopril in improving survival
and with equal statistical power
the addition of the ARB valsartan to captopril was superior to the proven dose of captopril in improving survival
VALIANT: Endpoints
Primary Endpoints
Time to all-cause mortality
–Cardiovascular mortality
–Cardiovascular mortality, reinfarction, and hospitalization for heart failure
–Cardiovascular mortality, reinfarction, hospitalization for heart failure, resuscitated sudden death, stroke
Secondary Endpoints
Am Heart J. 2000;140:727–734.
Captopril4909
4871 (99.2%)
Vital status unknown:38 (0.8%)
Enrollment and Follow-up
Median follow-up: 24.7 months
Valsartan4909
4856 (98.9%)
Vital status unknown:53 (1.1%)
14,808 Patients Randomized
4837 (99.0%)
Vital status unknown:48 (1.0%)
Combination4885
Informed consent not ensured: 105 patients
14,703 Patients
13
Cap 6.25 mgVal 20 mg
Cap 12.5 mgVal 20 mg
Cap 25 mgVal 40 mg
Cap 50 mg (tid)Val 80 mg (bid)
COMBINATION
Cap 6.25 mgCap 12.5 mg
Cap 25 mgCap 50 mg (tid)
CAPTOPRIL (tid)
Val 20 mgVal 40 mg
Val 80 mgVal 160 mg (bid)
VALSARTAN (bid)
Step I
GOAL by 3 months
Step IVStep IIIStep II
Study DrugDose Titration
Am Heart J. 2000;140:727–734.
Lancet. 2002;360:752–760. Am J Cardiol. 1991;68:70D–79D. Lancet. 1993;342:821–828. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1670–1676. Data on file. Novartis Pharmaceuticals.
SAVE AIRE TRACE OPTIMAAL VALIANT
2,231 1,986 1,749
5,477
14,703
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
16,000
12,000
14,000
VALIANT: B- Largest Population
24 Countries. 931 Sites. 14,703 Patients.
Europe:5163
Australia/New Zealand:
443
Brazil andArgentina
:848
South Africa:
58
Russia:3135Canada:
1092
USA:3964
Captopril
25% Reduction in Mortality
Pfeffer, McMurray, Velazquez, et al. N Engl J Med 2003;349
Months
Valsartan vs. Captopril: HR = 0.96; P = 0.198
Valsartan + Captopril vs. Captopril: HR = 0.97; P = 0.3690
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0 6 12 18 24 30 36
Pro
bab
ilit
y o
f Even
t
Valsartan
Valsartan + Captopril
NoninferiorityVal
Superior to Cap
Cap Superior to Val
Noninferiority not
Demonstrated
CardiovascularMortality and Morbidity
0.8 1 1.2
Hazard Ratio(97.5% CI)
1.13
P-value(noninferiority)
noninferiority margin
CV Death(1657 events)
0.001
CV Death or HF(2661 events)
0.0001
CV Death or MI(2234 events)
0.00001
CV Death, MI, or HF
(3096 events)
0.000001
Favors Valsartan Favors Captopril
Captopril
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0 6 12 18 24 30 36
Months
Pro
bab
ilit
y o
f Even
t
Study DrugDiscontinuation
Overall
Due to Adverse Events
*P < 0.05 vs Captopril
Valsartan + Captopril*
*
Valsartan
*
In patients with MI complicated by heart failure, leftventricular dysfunction or both:
25% Reduction in Mortality
Implications:
Tareg approved now MRP & in more 50 countries
As First line Treatment in Acute M.I
Conclusion