Tuan Jean (TJ) Tee, MBA, CITA-P (IASA), Prosci Microsoft ... library/Resources and... · Tuan Jean...
Transcript of Tuan Jean (TJ) Tee, MBA, CITA-P (IASA), Prosci Microsoft ... library/Resources and... · Tuan Jean...
Tuan Jean (TJ) Tee, MBA, CITA-P (IASA), Prosci
Enterprise Advisor
Microsoft Services
Please note:
1. that this is a non-binding proposal for discussion purposes only. This proposal
supersedes all previous communication with respect to Microsoft Services Premier
Support for CAUDIT and its Members. This document is confidential and not to be
shared with any third party, and
2. that the information covered in this document is provided under the Non-Disclosure
Agreement (NDA) signed by CAUDIT and effective as of 11 November 2010.
• Portfolio of Azure Services increases
rapidly, with increasing rate of innovation
• Customers spend time debating the cloud
• Cloud projects tend to fail when starting
with big scenarios and complexity
• Dream Big - Start Small
• Which Scenarios do you start with?
• IaaS vs. PaaS?
• Governance, Risk, Compliance and Privacy
need to be addressed holistically
• Architect for the cloud: Data Center
extension or a new Cloud workload
• What are your most pressing Business
Priorities?
• How can Microsoft Cloud enable,
differentiate and accelerate Business
Scenarios?
• Which Scenario has been proven in the
cloud?
• How to calculate value?
• What is a valid cloud decision model?
The Azure Reference Architecture initiative for CAUDIT, leveraging Enterprise Strategy Services from Microsoft,
leads Universities through these barriers to create business value with the Microsoft Azure Cloud Platform
Where to Start?Governance, Risk, Compliance, PrivacyHow to create Value with the Cloud?
Enterprise Strategy Services for Cloud AdoptionRemove Barriers and accelerate to Cloud Adoption
Enterprise Strategy Services for Cloud AdoptionA tailored service for consideration by Members
Benefits
• Accelerate your journey to an Azure Cloud using a
consolidated solution approach leveraging a best
practice reference architecture
• Through a shared IP model, reduce the cost of
individually creating a reference architecture to
build value
Enterprise Strategy Program
• Led by a Microsoft Enterprise Architect
• Backed by global Subject Matter Expertise
• Microsoft IP Library to accelerate the program and
reduce risk through the use of proven
methodologies
Scenarios
• Accelerate the value of your Cloud investment
• Consider Governance, Risk, Compliance and Privacy
• Define a solution blueprint to provide a decision
framework for design decisions for each of the
components of the Azure platform
SCOPE
Network and Connectivity into Azure Services1
Identity for Azure2
Governance for Azure Services3
Monitoring and billing management4
Security model for Virtual Machines5
Detailed Reference Architecture on how to connect
from the data-centre into Microsoft Azure
Identity model for authentication and authorisation
of Azure services
Governance model for Azure services
Monitoring and billing model for Azure services
Security model for consuming Azure services (IaaS,
PaaS)
Backup and Disaster Recovery
Azure Reference Architecture
(~10 weeks)
Customisation
(~1 week)Solid Foundation for
Accelerating Value
on the Azure platform
Proposed Shared Cost Per University
One week of workshops to go through the
Reference Architecture and make necessary
adjustments based on your unique situation.
One week of workshops to customise the
design framework7
6 Backup and Disaster Recovery for cloud instances
Enterprise Strategy Services ScopeAzure Reference Architecture
I. CAUDIT Microsoft Azure Reference Architecture.
Microsoft will perform the following activities as part of this engagement.
Work with CAUDIT, and nominated Universities, to develop and document
the Reference Architecture for Microsoft Azure on the following domains:
1. Network and Connectivity into Azure Services
2. Identity for Azure
3. Governance model for Azure Services
4. Monitoring and Billing management for Azure Services
5. Security model for Virtual Machines
6. Backup and Disaster Recovery
II. Develop a Service Delivery Plan (SDP)
The Service Delivery Plan is the mechanism that is used to align the core
engagement deliverables against CAUDIT’s requirements.
Microsoft will develop and maintain a Service Delivery Plan during the
course of the engagement consisting of the following areas:
1. Identification of the rules for conducting, monitoring and directing
the engagement. This section specifies how the engagement is
planned and how progress and issues will be reported. The
engagement governance processes defined in this document must
be approved by CAUDIT management prior to beginning the
engagement. Also, any future changes to the program governance
practices must be described in a revision to this document and
approved by CAUDIT management.
2. Clarify what is to be accomplished during the Enterprise Strategy
Program’s engagement. The second section is a forward looking
document that should be reviewed and updated on a monthly basis
with stakeholders from CAUDIT and Microsoft.
Proposed Service Delivery Plan
Plan Envisioning Reference Architecture Operational Finalise
(weeks 2-3) (weeks 4-8) (week 9) (week 10+)(week 1)
Reference Architecture
Security Model
Network and Connectivity
Identity
Envisioning workshop
Service Delivery Plan
Kick off
• Microsoft Enterprise Architect
kicks off the program
• CAUDIT agrees on workshop
schedules and attendees for
the project term
• Microsoft Enterprise Architect
develops Service Delivery Plan
for the program
• Microsoft Enterprise Architect
conducts a high-level
introduction of current Azure
capabilities
• Microsoft Enterprise Architect
to conduct workshops to
confirm requirements and
scenarios to create a common
requirements across all
participating University
Members.
• Microsoft Enterprise Architect
and SME to create Reference
Architecture for the areas in
scope
• Microsoft Enterprise Architect
delivers Governance
framework
• Microsoft Enterprise Architect
finalises, publishes and
presents the Azure Reference
Architecture
Workshops Schedule Requirements and Scenarios
Monitoring
Backup and Recovery
Governance Model
Phase 1 Phase 2
Architecture continuum