Tradeoff Analysis: From Science to Policy John M. Antle Department of Ag Econ & Econ
description
Transcript of Tradeoff Analysis: From Science to Policy John M. Antle Department of Ag Econ & Econ
Tradeoff Analysis: From Science to PolicyTradeoff Analysis: From Science to Policy
John M. AntleJohn M. Antle
Department of Ag Econ & EconDepartment of Ag Econ & Econ
Montana State UniversityMontana State University
How can we link relevant agricultural, environmental and economic sciences to support informed policy decision making?
E.g., do we know what policies will reduce poverty and encourage adoption of more sustainable practices in the Machakos region?
• Ag Scientists: improve crop varieties and management
• Environmentalists: need LISA
• Economists: need to “get prices right”
The Challenge: Policy-Relevant Science
The TOA Approach: Agriculture as a complex system…
• interconnected physical, biological and human systems varying over space and time
- the role of heterogeneity in relevant populations
the fallacy of the “representative unit”
- the role of human decision making
- the role of system dynamics and nonlinearities
- relevant scales of analysis to support policy decisions
The Challenge: Policy-Relevant Science
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
200000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Nutrient Depletion (kg/ha/yr)
Net
Re
turn
s (
Ks
h/h
a/f
arm
)
V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6
Heterogeneity: Nutrient Depletion and Net Returns in Machakos
Variation within and between systems…
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
200000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Nutrient Depletion (kg/ha/yr)
Net
Re
turn
s (
Ks
h/h
a/f
arm
)
V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 Linear (V6) Linear (V1)
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
0 50 100 150 200 250
Mean Net Returns ($ per acre)
Coe
ffici
ent
of V
aria
tion
of N
et R
etur
ns
Base CC-A CC-N CO2-A CO2-N CC+CO2-A CC+CO2-N
Human Behavior: Mean versus coefficient of variation of net returns by Montana sub-MLRA, for climate change (CC) and CO2 fertilization
scenarios with (A) and without (N) adaptation. (Source: Antle et al., Climatic Change, 2004).
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
0 50 100 150
Thickness A-horizon (cm)
Pro
duct
ion
(kg
D.M
. /ha
)
Nonlinearities: The effect of differences in the thickness of the fertile A-horizon on the dry matter production of potatoes as simulated with the DSSAT crop model in the northern Andean region of Ecuador.
Complexity: The temporal dynamics in carbofuran leaching for 4 different fields as a result of tillage erosion and management changes in the northern Andean region of Ecuador. (Source: Antle and Stoorvogel, Environment and Development Economics, in press).
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Year
Inc
rea
se
in c
arb
ofu
ran
lea
ch
ing
(g
/ha
/yr)
A: shallow topsoil, low tillage erosion rate
B: deep topsoil, low tillage erosion rate
C: shallow topsoil, high tillage erosion rate
D: deep topsoil, high tillage erosion rate
How is it done? Coordinated disciplinary research.
How is it implemented: Tradeoff Analysis.
Tradeoff Analysis is a process that can be used to:
• set research priorities according to sustainability criteria
• support policy decision making
• use quantitative analysis tools to assess the sustainability of agricultural production systems.
Designing and Implementing Policy-Relevant Science
•Public stakeholders•Policy makers•Scientists
Research priority setting
Project design & implementation
Communicate to stakeholders
•Identify sustainability criteria•Formulate hypotheses as potential tradeoffs•Identify disciplines for research project•Identify models and data needs
define units of analysis•Collect data and implement disciplinary research
Tradeoff analysis process
It’s not a linear
process…e.g. NUTMON
TOA is based on an integrated assessment approach to modeling agricultural production systems, using spatially
referenced data and coupled disciplinary models.
Soils & Climate Data Economic Data
Crop/Livestock Models Economic Model
Land Use &Management
Environmental Process Models
EconomicOutcomes
EnvironmentalOutcomes
Yield
Implementing the TOA Approach: the TOA Software
The Tradeoff Analysis model is a tool to model agricultural
production systems by integrating spatial data and disciplinary
simulation models.It helps scientific teams to
quantify and visualize tradeoffs between key indicators under alternative policy, technology
and environmental scenarios of interest to policy decision
makers and other stakeholders.
Example: Assessing Impacts of Policy and Technology Options on the Sustainability of the
Machakos Production System
Nutrient Dep
Poverty
Define a tradeoff curve by varying a price (e.g., maize price) for a given technology and policy environment. What is the
form of the tradeoff?
Factors Affecting Slope of Tradeoff Curve:
• Productivity of each system at each site
• Nutrient balance of each system at each site
• Effects of maize price on farmers’ choice of system at each site (extensive margin)
• Effects of maize price on farmers’ choice of management at each site (intensive margin)
• Spatial distribution of systems, prices
Technology and Policy Scenarios:
Manure Management, Fertilizer Prices
Nutrient Dep
Poverty
How do these scenarios shift the tradeoff curve?
Do curves differ spatially?
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
200000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Nutrient Depletion (kg/ha/yr)
Net
Re
turn
s (
Ks
h/h
a/f
arm
)
V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6
Machakos: Base Technology and Prices, Individual Farms
basevv
DEP10W1301201101009080706050
NR
AW
86,000
84,000
82,000
80,000
78,000
76,000
74,000
72,000
70,000
68,000
66,000
64,000
62,000
60,000
58,000
56,000
54,000
52,000
Base Technology and Prices, Aggregated by Village
Base Technology and Prices, Aggregated by Village
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
10 60 110 160 210 260 310 360
Nutrient Depletion
Po
vert
y
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
10 60 110 160 210 260 310 360
Nutrient Depletion
Po
vert
y
Aggregated by Tradeoff Point and Village
BASET
DEP10W130120110100908070605040
PO
VE
RT
Y75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
Aggregated by Tradeoff Point
Aggregated by Tradeoff Point with Alternative Policy and Technology Scenarios
BASE MANURE FERT PRICE MANURE + FERT PRICEMAIZE PRODUCTIVITY
DEP10W15014013012011010090807060504030
PO
VE
RT
Y75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
Conclusions:
• TOA is a tool that can integrate data and modeling tools to support informed policy decision making
• The challenges:
• Make the tools available to clients.
• Create a demand for better information.
• Improve the tools:
• lower cost of adoption and use
• expand applicability
Process for Transfer of TOA Tools to Users:
• Informing potential clients (web sites, etc)
• Training (workshops, on-line course)
• Collaborative agreements with clients
• Use by client staff with TOA support
• Follow-up to assess strengths and weaknesses
Key Issue: High adoption (training) and implementation costs (data)
• Data
• Soils and climate
• Economic: farm surveys
• Model complexity (training)
• DSSAT models
• Economic models
• Environmental models
Solutions
• Data
• Soils and climate: down-scaling techniques
• Economic: minimum data approach
• Linkages to existing data: NUTMON
• Model complexity
• Bio-physical: landscape-scale empirical models
• Economic: minimum data approach
Experience
• Downscaling & linkages: Peru, Senegal, Kenya
• soil & climate data
• adaptation of existing farm survey data
• Kenya: complex model implemented in 3 months with NUTMON data, but model complexity remains
• Minimum data: Panama
• simple model implemented with 1 week training, 1 month data collection & model development
• but limited applicability
Implications
• Optimal strategy for institutionalization
• utilize minimum data approach for training and initial applications
• develop more detailed applications if needed as clients acquire capability, data
Conclusions
• TOA successfully implemented as an operational tool applied to various policy problems
• environmental & human health impacts of pesticide use (Ecuador)
• terracing and related conservation investments (Peru, Senegal)
• soil carbon sequestration (USA, Peru, Senegal, Kenya)
• nutrient depletion (Senegal, Kenya)
Conclusions (cont.)
• Adoption by national and international institutions is in progress
• Development of downscaling & minimum data methods will lower adoption costs
• Further experience needed to fully assess impact
But…note methodological issues to be confronted in assessing impact of policy research (see Pardey and Smith, IFPRI, 2004)