TR33 in the Light of the US-Dark Energy Task Force Report
-
Upload
ferdinand-dotson -
Category
Documents
-
view
39 -
download
0
description
Transcript of TR33 in the Light of the US-Dark Energy Task Force Report
TR33 in the Light of the US-Dark Energy Task Force
Report
Thomas ReiprichDanny HudsonOxana NenestyanHolger Israel Emmy Noether Research GroupArgelander-Institut für AstronomieUniversität Bonnhttp://www.dark-energy.net
US-Dark Energy Task Force (DETF)
• Established to advise DoE, NASA, and NSF on future of dark energy research.
• Members: Kolb, Albrecht, Bernstein, Cahn, Freedman, Hewitt, Hu, Huth, Kamionkowski, Knox, Mather, Staggs, Suntzeff.
• US - why care? Useful calculations, trendsetter.
Introductory Remarks
• DE one of most important problems in all physical sciences.
• Most critical component of any approach to DE problem is improvement in experimental constraints.
• Clear steps can be taken to drive significant progress.
Four Main Techniques• Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO; new, less
affected by astrophysical uncertainties but least statistical power).
• Galaxy Cluster (CL) surveys (MF, statistical power to exceed BAO and SN but currently largest systematic uncertainties).
• Supernova (SN) surveys (at present most powerful).• Weak Lensing (WL) surveys (new, if systematics
under control as currently predicted then most powerful technique).
• No primary CMB. GRBs and GW unclear.
Four Stages
• I: Known today.
• II: Known after completion of ongoing projects.
• III: Currently proposed near term projects.
• IV: LST, SKA, JDEM.
Recommendations
• Multiple techniques at every stage, at least one sensitive to growth of structure.
• Stage III projects should achieve factor 3 gain over stage II projects.
• Stage IV factor 10.• High priority for near term funding for
studies of systematic efffects.
Goals, Figure of Merit
• Accelerated expansion due to cosmological constant?
• If not, constrain w(a) (= w0+(1-a)wa).
• Check for inconsistency between w(a) from cosmic expansion and growth of structure (i.e., possible failure of general relativity).
• Figure of merit: 1/area of 95% error ellipse in w0/wa plane.
Direct Relation to TR33
• All observational methods included!– BAO: B8– CL: B4, B6, B7 (optical, SZ, X-ray, lensing)– SN: B3– WL: B5
Direct Relation to TR33
• “Our inability to forecast systematic error levels reliably is the biggest impediment to judging the future capabilities of the techniques.” => Use results with care. => Test systematics.
Direct Relation to TR33
• TR includes (almost?) all mentioned primary tests for systematics for all techniques:– BAO: better theoretical understanding of non-linear
regime and bias (B8, C1).– CL: observational constraints from lensing, SZ, and
X-rays on observable-mass relation (B6, B7).– SN: detailed observations of nearby SN to study
dependence of peak luminosities (and spectra) on observational parameters (B3).
– WL: observational calibration of photo-z technique (also for BAO) and study feasibility of corrections for intrinsic galaxy shapes and PSF (~B5, B8?).
Direct Relation to TR33
• Involvement in– JDEM?– LST?– SKA?