Tolstoy & Kandinsky: Music and The Nature of Good Art

12
{ Tolstoy & Kandinsky: Music and The Nature of Good Art Toby Lee

description

Tolstoy & Kandinsky: Music and The Nature of Good Art. Toby Lee. Leo Tolstoy (1828-1910) Russian B elieved that art served to communicate emotion Theory on art aligns with the Expressionist Movement art. Background on Tolstoy. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Tolstoy & Kandinsky: Music and The Nature of Good Art

Page 1: Tolstoy & Kandinsky: Music and The Nature of Good Art

{

Tolstoy & Kandinsky: Music and The Nature of Good Art

Toby Lee

Page 2: Tolstoy & Kandinsky: Music and The Nature of Good Art

Leo Tolstoy (1828-1910) Russian Believed that art served to communicate

emotion Theory on art aligns with the

Expressionist Movement art

Background on Tolstoy

Page 3: Tolstoy & Kandinsky: Music and The Nature of Good Art

Tolstoy states that in spectating a work of art a type of contract always exists between an artist and his or her audience.

“Every work of art causes the receiver to enter into a certain kind of relationship both with him who produced, or is producing, the art, and with all those who, simultaneously, previously, or subsequently receive the same artistic impression.” (49)

Tolstoy’s Theory of Art

Page 4: Tolstoy & Kandinsky: Music and The Nature of Good Art

Tolstoy also contends that art is unifying. “The activity of art is based on the fact

that a man, receiving through his sense of hearing or sight another man’s expression of feeling, is capable of experiencing the emotion which moved the man to express it.” (49)

Page 5: Tolstoy & Kandinsky: Music and The Nature of Good Art

Tolstoy emphasizes that the principle characteristic of good art is a kind of conscious and intelligible transmission of emotion from the artist to the audience.

“Art is a human activity consisting in this, that one man, consciously, by means of certain external signs, hands on to other’s feelings he has lived through and that other people are infected by these feelings and also experience them.” (51)

“Simple music has a far stronger effect. There are composers I must make an effort to understand, but this [simple] music enters the soul.”

Tolstoy’s more all-encompassing definition of art allows for a number of different mediums to be considered art so long as they deliberately transmit visceral emotion. Do you think that music is a more fitting vehicle of transmitting emotion than painting? Why or why not?

Page 6: Tolstoy & Kandinsky: Music and The Nature of Good Art

Kandinsky (1866-1944) Russian painter and art theorist Pioneer of Abstract art His works of 1913 are considered one of

the first manifestations of completely abstracted art in art history

Heavily influenced by a love of music

Wassily Kandinsky

Page 7: Tolstoy & Kandinsky: Music and The Nature of Good Art

For Kandinsky, the abstraction of form and color was absolutely essential to the transmission of emotion.

Kandinsky strove to let the emotion in art speak for speak for itself as opposed to let the harsh realities of realistic form and color distort the emotional output of his work.

Kandinsky suggested that music was superior to painting due to it’s inherent abstraction

Kandinsky on Music and Emotion

Page 8: Tolstoy & Kandinsky: Music and The Nature of Good Art

Created in 1911 in Munich, Germany Founded and led by Kandinsky and Franz

Marc, a German Expressionist Formed on a premise of creating art that

lacked the restrictive components of realistic form and color, in order to allow emotion to be at the forefront of a work

Der Blaue Reiter comes from Kandinsky’s painting of the same name created in 1903

Der Blaue Reiter (The Blue Rider)

Page 9: Tolstoy & Kandinsky: Music and The Nature of Good Art

Wassily Kandinsky – Der Blaue Reiter1903Oil on Canvas60 cm

Page 10: Tolstoy & Kandinsky: Music and The Nature of Good Art
Page 11: Tolstoy & Kandinsky: Music and The Nature of Good Art
Page 12: Tolstoy & Kandinsky: Music and The Nature of Good Art

What emotion did you feel in the three pieces? Did it align with the emotions you felt in looking at Kandinsky’s work?

Do you think Kandinsky’s claim regarding music’s supremacy over painting is correct? In regard to Tolstoy’s theory about emotional transferal in art, does one medium of art more effectively conveys emotion?

Of the three compositions, did you think any would are effective works of art in Tolstoy’s theory?

What about one of the three pieces is successful in translating the emotional charge of the artist to the viewer?

Concluding Questions