ToL_09_14_09_Regular Council Agenda Package

8/14/2019 ToL_09_14_09_Regular Council Agenda Package

1/91


2/91

September 14, 2009Regular Council Meeting Agenda

Page

H. BYLAWS FOR FINAL ADOPTION

11-89 1. Rezoning Application RZ100311(Jeannotte/Tanzite)Bylaw No. 4693Report 08-135 and 09-35File CD 11-06-0179

Recommendation that Council give final reading to Township oZoning Bylaw 1987 No. 2500 Amendment (Jeannotte) Bylaw 20No. 4693.

Explanation Bylaw No. 4693

Bylaw No. 4693 rezones 0.40 ha (1 acre) of land located at 217Avenue to Residential Zone R-1D to accommodate a five (5) lofamily subdivision.

Clerks Note: Community Development advises that all development listed in the Community Development Division report to Council of Maand July 28, 2008 attached to the Bylaw have been satisfactorily addPublic Hearing for the bylaw was held on September 15, 2008 with thgiven on March 23, 2009.

I. CORRESPONDENCE

J. OTHER BUSINESS

K. TERMINATE


3/91

REGULAR MEETING OF

TOWNSHIP COUNCILMonday, August 31, 2009 at 7:00 p.m.

Fraser River Presentation Theatre4th Floor, 20338 65 Avenue, Langley, BC

M I N U T E S

Present: Mayor Green

Councillors J. Bateman, B. Dornan, S. Ferguson, C. Fox, M. KositskyK. Richter and G. Ward

M. Bakken, P. Catlin, D. Leavers and R. Seifi

S. Carneiro

A. ADOPTION OF MINUTES

1. Regular Council Meeting July 20, 2009

Moved by Councillor Bateman,Seconded by Councillor Dornan,That Council adopt the Minutes of the Regular Council meetingJuly 20, 2009.CARRIED

B. PRESENTATIONS

C. DELEGATIONS (UP TO 5 DELEGATIONS)

1. Bruce TaylorFile 0550-07


4/91

August 31, 2009Regular Council Meeting


3. Art BandenieksFile 0550-07

Art Bandenieks a representative of the Aldergrove Youth Soccethe Aldergrove United Soccer Club, appeared before Council toSouth Aldergrove Athletic Park Development. He recommendeTownship work toward preparing the site for an artificial turf field

2. Heath MacKenzie and Russ SimpsonFile 0550-07

Heath MacKenzie and Russ Simpson of Langley Mountain Bikeappeared before Council to discuss further development of the Athletic Park and to voice their support regarding the proposed park.

The original order of the agenda then resumed.

4. Brad RickettsFile 0550-07

Brad Ricketts appeared before Council to discuss possible opphouse the Radio Control Flying Club of British Columbia. He reMayor and Councils endorsement to utilize the Jackman Pit asonce proper approvals are in place.

Councillor Bateman left the meeting at 7:20 p.m. and rejoined tat 7:21 p.m.

5. John and Marilyn ThomsonFile 0550-07

John and Marilyn Thomson appeared before Council to discuss

traffic through school zones on Willoughby Way and requested bumps or some kind of traffic calming device be installed.

6. Rodney BlackwellFile 0550-07

Rodney Blackwell appeared before Council regarding the Fort L


5/91



7. Helen SmithFile 0550-07

Madeleine De Little appeared before Council on behalf of Helendiscuss the Bedford Landing Development and requested that Cpublic input regarding rezoning.

8. Grant RawstronFort Langley Canoe ClubFile 0550-07

Grant Rawstron, Fort Langley Canoe Club appeared before Codiscuss the Fort Langley Waterfront Development. He recommCouncil consult the Canoe and Rowing Clubs in the planning pnoted that there is a need for storage and clubhouse/training fa

D. REPORTS TO COUNCIL

1. Aldergrove Athletic Park Concept PlanReport 09-117File CD 6130-20-AATH1

Moved by Councillor Fox,Seconded by Councillor Ferguson,That Council receive the report entitled Aldergrove Athletic ParPlan and the results of the public input, for information;

That Council endorse the Aldergrove Athletic Park Concept Plafuture development of the park; and further

That Council authorize staff to proceed with site preparation as

of developing the new proposed facilities in the park.

AMENDMENT

Moved by Councillor Richter,Seconded by Mayor Green,That staff provide a report on cost of moving forward for the 20


6/91


D. REPORTS TO COUNCIL

2. Provincial Agricultural Land Commission Application No. 1(Larry Rodgers)Report 09-114File CD 13-32-0001

Moved by Councillor Ward,Seconded by Councillor Bateman,That the Provincial Agricultural Land Commission (PALC) be adthe subdivision of property located at 27550 - 48 Avenue, is supsubject to compliance with the requirements of the PALC and, asubdivision application, the Township of Langleys Subdivision Development Control Bylaw.CARRIED

Councillor Ferguson opposed

3. Rezoning Application No. 100333(Exousia Properties Inc.)Report 09-113File CD 13-08-0011

The report was withdrawn.

E. BYLAWS FOR FIRST AND SECOND READING

1. Rezoning Application No. 100330Development Permit Application No. 100583(Desert Properties Inc.)Bylaw 4746Report 09-116File CD 08-26-0109

Moved by Councillor Fox,Seconded by Councillor Ward,That Council give first and second reading to Rezoning Bylaw Nrezoning 1.54 ha (3.82 acres) of land located on the north side (west of 201 Street) to Comprehensive Development Zone CD-a business park development subject to the following developm


7/91



General Manager of Engineering;3. Provision of road dedication (5.6 metres on 86 Avenue, 3.5

201 Street and a corner truncation at the 86 Avenue / 201 Sintersection) in accordance with Schedule P-1 of the TownsSubdivision and Development Control Bylaw (Policy Sectionamended to reflect this requirement to the acceptance of thManager of Engineering;

4. Compliance with the Townships Tree Protection Bylaw, incprovision of a final tree protection plan incorporating tree rereplacement and protection details, to the acceptance of theParks Design and Development;

5. Completion of landscaping plans (including greenway constdesign requirements) to the acceptance of the Manager of Pand Development;

6. Register a restrictive covenant limiting access to the site fronortherly driveway on 201 Street and from 86 Avenue to rig

turning movements and prohibiting off-street parking on 86 201 Street abutting the site, to the acceptance of the Generof Engineering;

7. Register a restrictive covenant requiring provision of a 5.0 mlandscaping area adjacent to the 201 Street and 86 Avenuefrontages;

8. Provision of a CPTED (Crime Prevention through Environmreview of the development (including design and operation parkade, elevators, pedestrian connections and lighting) byCPTED professional (in consultation with the Langley RCMacceptance of the Director of Community Development, incincorporation of the CPTED recommendations into the final plans;

9. Approval of Rezoning Bylaw No. 4746 by the Ministry of Traand

10. Payment of supplemental Rezoning Application fee and SiteReview fee; and further

That Council at time of final reading of Bylaw No. 4746 authorizof Development Permit No. 100583 subject to the following con

a) Building plans being in substantial compliance with Scheduthrough J;

b) Final on site landscaping plans being in substantial complia


8/91



e) All garbage facilities to be located within buildings or screenf) Freestanding signage on 201 Street and 86 Avenue to be in

with Township of Langley Sign Bylaw 2005 No. 4402, and tocoordinated in design with the freestanding sign adjacent toBuilding A and 200 Street, and

g) Rooftop mechanical equipment to be located so as not to badjacent roads, or alternatively to be screened from view byarchitectural treatments.

Although not part of the Development Permit requirements, theadvised that prior to issuance of a building permit, the followingneed to be finalized:

h) Payment of supplemental Development Permit application f

That Council authorize staff to schedule the required public hea

Rezoning Bylaw in conjunction with Development Permit No. 10CARRIED

Councillor Long left the meeting at 8:28 and rejoined the meetin8:31 p.m.

2. Rezoning Application No. 100339Development Permit Application No. 100590(Township of Langley)Bylaw 4769Report 09-112File CD 08-14-0172

Moved by Councillor Ferguson,Seconded by Councillor Bateman,That Council give first and second reading to Bylaw No. 4769 reapproximately 0.30 ha (0.75 acre) of land located at

7185 202B Street to Residential Compact Lot Zone R-CL to aa three (3) lot single family subdivision, subject to the following prerequisites being satisfied prior to final reading:

1. Completion of the required road, utility, landscaping and greupgrades and extensions in accordance with the Townshipand Development Control Bylaw;


9/91



the time of subdivision;

That Council at the time of final reading of Bylaw No. 4769 authissuance of Development Permit No. 100590 for the proposed sdevelopment subject to the following condition:

a) Completion of an exterior design control agreement ensurinbuilding design and site development standards are high qucompatible with surrounding lots; and further

That Council authorize staff to schedule the required public heaRezoning Bylaw No. 4769 in conjunction with the hearing for prDevelopment Permit No. 100590.CARRIED

F. BYLAWS FOR FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD READING

G. BYLAWS FOR CONSIDERATION AT THIRD READING

H. BYLAWS FOR FINAL ADOPTION

1. Rezoning Application No. 100315(Dorothy Mufford)Bylaw No. 4704Report 08-178File CD 11-18-0038

Moved by Councillor Ferguson,

Seconded by Councillor Dornan,That Council give final reading to Township of Langley Zoning No. 2500 Amendment (Dorothy Mufford) Bylaw 2008 No. 4704.CARRIED

I CORRESPONDENCE


10/91


K. MAYORS REPORT

The Mayor attended various events in the community during the pas

L. METRO VANCOUVER REPRESENTATIVES REPORT

The Mayor attended the Mayors Council on Regional Transportatio

meeting on transit issues and will report back to Council on the outc

M. ITEMS FROM PRIOR MEETINGS

N. ITEMS BROUGHT FORWARD FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION FROMSPECIAL CLOSED MEETINGS

O. ITEMS FOR INFORMATION

P. ITEMS HAVING PRIOR NOTICE OF MOTION

Q. OTHER BUSINESS

1. Traffic Calming Willoughby Way

Moved by Councillor Richter,Seconded by Mayor Green,That a report from staff on traffic calming measures include WilWay.CARRIED

2. Councillor Richter provided the following Notice of Motion to beat the next meeting


11/91


Q. OTHER BUSINESS

3. Radio Control Flying Club

Moved by Councillor Ferguson,Seconded by Councillor Bateman,That staff provide a report on location options for the Radio ConClub.CARRIED

R. ADDITIONAL DELEGATIONS

S. TERMINATE

Moved by Councillor Ward,

Seconded by Councillor Fox,That the meeting terminate at 8:42 p.m.CARRIED

CERTIFIED CORRECT:

Mayor

Deputy Township Clerk


12/91


13/91

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF LANGLEY

TOWNSHIP OF LANGLEY ZONING BYLAW 1987 NO. 2500

AMENDMENT (JEANNOTTE) BYLAW 2008 NO. 4693

EXPLANATORY NOTE

Bylaw No. 4693 rezones 0.40 ha (1 acre) of land located at 21726 49A Avenue

Residential Zone R-1D to accommodate a five (5) lot single family subdivision.


14/91

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF LANGLEY

TOWNSHIP OF LANGLEY ZONING BYLAW 1987 NO. 2500

AMENDMENT (JEANNOTTE) BYLAW 2008 NO. 4693

WHEREAS it is deemed necessary and desirable to amend Township of LangleyBylaw 1987 No. 2500 as amended;

NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the Township of Open Meeting Assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as Township of Langley Zoning No. 2500 Amendment (JEANNOTTE) Bylaw 2008 No. 4693.

2. The Township of Langley Zoning Bylaw 1987 No. 2500 as amended is fuamended by rezoning the lands described as:

Lot 37 Section 6 Township 11 New Westminster District Plan 39985

as shown delineated on Schedule A attached to and forming part of this Residential Zone R-1D.

READ A FIRST TIME the 28 day of July

READ A SECOND TIME the 28 day of July

PUBLIC HEARING HELD the 15 day of September

READ A THIRD TIME the 23 day of March

RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTEDthe

day of

Mayor Depu


15/91


16/91

REPORT TO

MAYOR AND COUNCIL

PRESENTED: JULY 28, 2008 - REGULAR MEETING REPOR

FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION FILE:SUBJECT: REZONING APPLICATION RZ100311

(JEANNOTTE / TANZITE)

PROPOSAL:

Rezone 0.40 ha (1 acre) ofland located at 21726 49AAvenue to Residential ZoneR-1D to accommodate a five(5) lot single familysubdivision.

RECOMMENDATIONSUMMARY:

That Council give first andsecond reading to Bylaw No.4693 with completion ofthree (3) development

prerequisites.

RATIONALE:

The proposed rezoningcomplies with the provisionsof the Murrayville CommunityPlan.


17/91

REZONING APPLICATION RZ100311(JEANNOTTE / TANZITE)Page 2 . . .

RECOMMENDATIONS:

That Council give first and second reading to Bylaw No. 4693 rezoning 0.40 ha (1located at 21726 49A Avenue to Residential Zone R-1D to accommodate a fivefamily subdivision, subject to the following development prerequisites being satfinal reading:

1. Registration of a non-disturbance restrictive covenant requiring that no signifremoved or disturbed onsite (except where necessary for the installation of stree retention, protection and replacement details are addressed to the satis

Manager of Parks Design and Development at time of subdivision;2. Registration of a restrictive covenant requiring provision of an exterior d

agreement to be entered into at the subdivision approval stage; and further,3. Payment of supplemental rezoning application fee.

That Council authorize staff to schedule the required public hearing.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Quinn Jeannotte has applied to rezone 0.40 ha (1 acre) of land located at 21726 to Residential Zone R-1D. The rezoning will facilitate the subsequent subdivision oserviced single family lots. The Murrayville Community Plan designates the landFamily Two allowing subdivisions having a minimum lots size of 650 m2 (7,0supports the rezoning proposal as it complies with the Murrayville Community Plan

PURPOSE:

This report is to advise and make recommendations with respect to rezoning applic

RZ100311.


18/91



19/91


ZONING BYLAW NO. 2500

RR--11DD

RR--11DD

RR--11DD


20/91


Preliminary Subdivision Plan SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT

217AStreet


21/91


Conceptual Block Plan SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT

217AStreet

49 Avenue

48A Avenue


22/91


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

Owner: Tanzite Ventures Inc.4038 200B StreetLangley, BC V3A 1N9

Applicant: Quinn Jeannotte2201 204A StreetLangley, BC V2Z 2A2

Legal Description: Lot 37 Section 6 Township 11

New Westminster District Plan 39985PID: 008-695-938

Location: 21726 49A Avenue

Area: 0.40 ha (1acre)

Existing Zoning: Suburban Residential Zone SR-1(minimum lot size 3,716 m2 / 0.92 ac

Proposed Zoning: Residential Zone R-1D(minimum lot size 650 m2 /7,000 ft2).

Murrayville Community Plan: Single Family Two(maximum density 15 units per haacre; minimum lot size 650 m2 /7,000

E.S.A. Designation: E.S.A.# 66 Murrayville Urban Area

BACKGROUND:

The subject site is designated Single Family Two in the Murrayville Community Pa maximum residential density of 15 units per hectare (6 units per acre), at a minof 650 m2 (7,000 ft2). The current SR-1 zoning is reflective of minimum lot sizes prior to development and the provision of full urban services. The subject lot is on

(4) properties in the area that have not been rezoned to R-1D.

DISCUSSION / ANALYSIS:

The proponent is applying to rezone approximately 0.40 ha (1.0 acre) of land locat49A Avenue to Residential Zone R-1D to accommodate a subsequent subdivisisingle family lots. The subject property is currently occupied by one single family


23/91


Density:

The subject site is designated Single Family Two in the Murrayville Community Pa maximum density of 15 units per hectare (6 units per acre), at a minimum lot s(7,000 ft2). The applicant proposes a subsequent subdivision application of five (5)lots at a proposed density of 12 units per hectare (5 units per acre) with a minimu650 m2 (7,000 ft2).

Subdivision:

A preliminary subdivision layout has been submitted in support of the rezoning pcreation of five (5) single family residential lots. The applicant has also prepared

block plan indicating the relationship of the subject site to the adjacent undevelopshown on the conceptual block plan, the introduction of a cul-de-sac to the blockfuture subdivision potential of these surrounding currently over-sized properties.details, including dedication of the cul-de-sac, will be addressed at time of subdivito the Subdivision and Development Control Bylaw and Policy.

Servicing:

There are no servicing requirements for the proposed rezoning. Existing services

for the proposed use. At time of subdivision, a Servicing Agreement will be requconstruction of the east half of the proposed cul-de-sac (217A Street), installationmunicipal services (water, sanitary, storm) to service the proposed lots in accordaTownships Subdivision and Development Control Bylaw, and erosion and sedworks in accordance with the Townships Erosion and Sediment Control Bylaw.

Tree Protection:

In compliance with the Tree Protection Bylaw, the applicant has submitted a tretree summary schedule indicating that there are three (3) significant trees located osite. Based on the preliminary subdivision layout, all of the significant trees removed. As a result, the applicant will be required to plant 30 replacement tresubdivision. Registration of a non-disturbance restrictive covenant requiring that trees be removed or disturbed onsite (except where necessary for the installationuntil tree retention, protection and replacement details are addressed to the satisManager of Parks Design and Development at time of subdivision is required as afinal reading.

Transit:Translink currently operates two Community Shuttles through Murrayville with Avenue, as well as a regular bus route along Fraser Highway. The road layout fhas been designed to accommodate future transit routes in accordance witoperating policy / procedures, which Council is given an opportunity to review each


24/91


Schools:

The subject site is located within the catchment area for James Hill Eleme

approximately 1.5 kilometres southeast of the subject site. Langley FundamentaSchool is located 1 block north of the subject site. High school students will atSecondary School.

Parks:

There are two parks in the vicinity of the subject site. Denny Ross Memorial southeast of the site on Old Yale Road. Porter Park is located west of the site on 2

Development Prerequisites:Prior to final reading of the rezoning bylaw, the following items must be completed:

1. Registration of a non-disturbance restrictive covenant requiring that no sigbe removed or disturbed onsite (except where necessary for the installatiountil tree retention, protection and replacement details are addressed to thof the Manager of Parks Design and Development at time of subdivision;

2. Registration of a restrictive covenant requiring provision of an exterior d

agreement to be entered into at the subdivision approval stage; and further,3. Payment of supplemental rezoning application fee.

POLICY CONSIDERATIONS:

Staff recommends approval of the rezoning application as the proposed developmwith the land use and density policies of the Murrayville Community Plan. Subdwill be addressed at the subdivision stage pursuant to the Townships SubDevelopment Control Bylaw and Policy.

Respectfully submitted,

Teresa HansonDEVELOPMENT PLANNERforCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

TEH/the


25/91

REPORT TO

MAYOR AND COUNCIL

PRESENTED: MARCH 23, 2009 - REGULAR MEETING REPOR

FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION FILE:SUBJECT: REZONING BYLAW NO. 4693 (JEANNOTTE/TANZITE)

REVIEW OF COMMENTS AND CONCERNS RAISED ATPUBLIC HEARING AND OPEN HOUSE

RECOMMENDATIONS:

That Council receive this report entitled Rezoning Bylaw No. 4693 (JeannoReview of Comments and Concerns Raised at Public Hearing and Open information; and further

That Council give third reading to Bylaw No. 4693, subject to the developmsubstantial compliance with the proposed alternate layout plan presented in thsubject to the following development pre-requisites being satisfied prior to final rea

1. Registration of a restrictive covenant requiring that on-site significant trees not bdisturbed (except where necessary for the installation of services) until final t

protection and replacement details are addressed to the acceptance of the ManDesign and Development;

2. Registration of a restrictive covenant requiring provision of an exterior dagreement to be entered into at the subdivision approval stage; and,

3. Payment of supplemental rezoning application fee.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On September 29, 2008 Council considered third reading of Bylaw No. 4693 rezo

(1 acre) of land located at 21726 49A Avenue to Residential Zone R-1D to accfive (5) lot single family subdivision. Council did not give third reading to the bylawreferred the application back to staff to address the comments and concerns public at the September 15, 2008 public hearing. In response to the concerns public hearing, the applicant submitted a panhandle subdivision plan (alternate proposes five (5) single family lots: two (2) lots fronting 49A Avenue and three


26/91

REZONING BYLAW NO. 4693 (JEANNOTTE/TANZITE)REVIEW OF COMMENTS AND CONCERNS RAISED ATPUBLIC HEARING AND OPEN HOUSE

Page 2 . . .

subdivision plan (alternate layout) and subject to the completion of three (3) prerequisites prior to final reading. Alternatively, Council may require that aHearing be held.

PURPOSE:

As requested by Council, this report provides a staff review of the comments raised by the public at the September 15, 2008 public hearing for Bylaw No. 469subsequent open house held by the Township on February 5, 2009.

REZONING BYLAW NO 4693 (JEANNOTTE/TANZITE)


27/91


Page 3 . . .

PRELIMINARY HALF CUL-DE-SAC SUBDIVISION PLAN SUBMITTED BY APP(Original Layout)

PRELIMINARY PANHANDLE SUBDIVISION PLAN SUBMITTED BY APPLIC(Alternate Layout)

49AAvenue



28/91


Page 4 . . .

ORIGINAL CONCEPTUAL BLOCK PLAN SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT

ALTERNATE CONCEPTUAL BLOCK PLAN SUBMITTED BY APPLICAN



29/91


Page 5 . . .

BACKGROUND:

At its September 29, 2008 regular meeting, Council considered third reading of Byrezoning a 0.40 ha (1 acre) of land located at 21726 49A Avenue to Residential Zaccommodate a five (5) lot single family subdivision. Council did not give third rbylaw, but instead referred the application back to staff to address the comments raised by the public at the September 15, 2008 public hearing and to holdsponsored open house with area residents.

Attached to this report, for Councils information, are the original Community Division report to Council dated July 28, 2008 (Attachment A), the minutes from th15, 2008 public hearing (Attachment B), and the minutes from the September 29,meeting (Attachment C).


In accordance with Councils direction, staff have reviewed the comments and coby the public at the September 15, 2008 public hearing. Comments and conc

focused on the layout of the proposed subdivision plan with respect to the loproposed half cul-de-sac, lot orientation, tree protection, drainage, traffic, emergaccess and removal of existing structures. Area residents also expressed conconceptual block plan showing the future subdivision potential of surrounding proon the proponents half cul-de-sac subdivision plan.

In light of the strong opposition to the applicants original conceptual block plan the area residents, the applicant held several smaller and informal open housresidents (November 28, December 1 and December 2, 2008) to discuss possib

subdivision plans / layouts. Evolving out of this process was the panhandle sub(alternate layout), which the majority of the area residents considered best adcomments and concerns raised at the public hearing.

Panhandle Subdivision Plan (Alternate Layout):

The panhandle subdivision plan (alternate layout) proposes five (5) single family lonumber of lots proposed by the half cul-de-sac subdivision plan (original lpanhandle subdivision plan (alternate layout) proposes two (2) lots fronting 49A

three (3) lots with panhandle access to 49A Avenue. The three (3) panhandle lotdriveway eight (8) metres wide with a small bulb at the end. This subdivisiosignificantly from the half cul-de-sac subdivision plan (original layout) which propolots fronting 49A Avenue and two (2) lots fronting a proposed half cul-de-sac alonproperty line.



30/91


Page 6 . . .

Public Open House:

In accordance with Councils direction, staff held a public open house on Februaprovide an opportunity for the public to review both the half cul-de-sac subdivisionlayout) and the newly conceived panhandle subdivision plan (alternate layout). Ainvitation letter (dated January 21, 2009) was mailed to all persons that received for the September 15, 2008 public hearing and was also mailed to all persons thsubmission at the public hearing. The open house invitation letter (Attachment brief description of the application, a copy of the half cul-de-sac subdivision

layout), a copy of the panhandle subdivision plan (alternate layout), and a quethose persons unable to attend the open house.

The open house was held February 5, 2009 between 4:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. at thHall (21667 48 Avenue). Community Development Division staff and the applithe open house to answer questions and give the public an opportunity to provid26 people attended the open house (as per the sign-in sheet) with 22 questionnaincluding those submitted by persons unable to attend the open house. The signquestionnaires and a summary of the responses are provided as attachments (Attachment E).

As per the completed questionnaires received, the majority of the area residents panhandle subdivision plan (alternate layout) over the half cul-de-sac subdivision layout). One (1) person preferred the half cul-de-sac subdivision plan (original lay(14) persons preferred the panhandle subdivision plan (alternate layout), ten preferred neither layout, two (2) persons preferred neither layout, but preferred tsubdivision plan (alternate layout) over the half cul-de-sac subdivision plan (origina

one (1) person had no preference. Staff note that seven (7) of the nine (9properties with further subdivision potential (as indicated on the conceptual blockthe panhandle subdivision plan (alternate layout). The owners of properties oppanhandle subdivision plan (alternate layout) either have already rezoned and Residential Zone R-1D lot sizes or are opposed to any further development in the

REZONING BYLAW NO. 4693 (JEANNOTTE/TANZITE)


31/91


Page 7 . . .


As requested by Council, this report addresses the comments and concerns raisedat the September 15, 2008 public hearing. Staff note that the proposed panhandplan (alternate layout) complies with both the Murrayville Community Plan and Residential Zone R-1D zoning. Although Council has the option of requiring ahearing, staff recommend that Bylaw No. 4693 be given third reading, sudevelopment being in substantial compliance with the panhandle subdivision playout) and subject to the completion of three (3) development prerequisites

reading. Subdivision details will be addressed at the subdivision stage puTownships Subdivision and Development Control Bylaw and Policy.


Patrick WardDEVELOPMENT PLANNERfor

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

PJWATTACHMENT A July 28, 2008 Report to CouncilATTACHMENT B September 15, 2008 Public Hearing MinutesATTACHMENT C September 29, 2008 Third Reading MinutesATTACHMENT D January 21, 2009 Open House Invitation Letter

ATTACHMENT E February 5, 2009 Open House Sign In Sheet, QuestioSummary of Responses

Att


32/91

REPORT TO

MAYOR AND COUNCIL

PRESENTED: JULY 28, 2008 - REGULAR MEETING REPOR

FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION FILE:SUBJECT: REZONING APPLICATION RZ100311

(JEANNOTTE / TANZITE)

PROPOSAL:

Rezone 0.40 ha (1 acre) ofland located at 21726 49A Avenue to Residential ZoneR-1D to accommodate a five(5) lot single family

subdivision.

RECOMMENDATIONSUMMARY:

That Council give first andsecond reading to Bylaw No.4693 with completion ofthree (3) development

prerequisites.

RATIONALE:

The proposed rezoningcomplies with the provisionsof the Murrayville CommunityPlan.

REZONING APPLICATION RZ100311


33/91

(JEANNOTTE / TANZITE)Page 2 . . .

RECOMMENDATIONS:

That Council give first and second reading to Bylaw No. 4693 rezoning 0.40 ha (1located at 21726 49A Avenue to Residential Zone R-1D to accommodate a fivefamily subdivision, subject to the following development prerequisites being satfinal reading:

1. Registration of a non-disturbance restrictive covenant requiring that no signifiremoved or disturbed onsite (except where necessary for the installation of stree retention, protection and replacement details are addressed to the satis

Manager of Parks Design and Development at time of subdivision;2. Registration of a restrictive covenant requiring provision of an exterior dagreement to be entered into at the subdivision approval stage; and further,


That Council authorize staff to schedule the required public hearing.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Quinn Jeannotte has applied to rezone 0.40 ha (1 acre) of land located at 21726 to Residential Zone R-1D. The rezoning will facilitate the subsequent subdivision oserviced single family lots. The Murrayville Community Plan designates the landFamily Two allowing subdivisions having a minimum lots size of 650 m2 (7,00supports the rezoning proposal as it complies with the Murrayville Community Plan

PURPOSE:

This report is to advise and make recommendations with respect to rezoning applic

RZ100311.

REZONING APPLICATION RZ100311(JEANNOTTE / TANZITE)


34/91




35/91


ZONING BYLAW NO. 2500

RR--11DD

RR--11DD

RR--11DD



36/91


Preliminary Subdivision Plan SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT

217AStreet



37/91


Conceptual Block Plan SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT

217AStreet

49 Avenue

48A Avenue



38/91


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

Owner: Tanzite Ventures Inc.

4038 200B StreetLangley, BC V3A 1N9

Applicant: Quinn Jeannotte2201 204A StreetLangley, BC V2Z 2A2

Legal Description: Lot 37 Section 6 Township 11

New Westminster District Plan 39985PID: 008-695-938

Location: 21726 49A Avenue

Area: 0.40 ha (1acre)

Existing Zoning: Suburban Residential Zone SR-1(minimum lot size 3,716 m2 / 0.92 ac

Proposed Zoning: Residential Zone R-1D(minimum lot size 650 m2 /7,000 ft2).

Murrayville Community Plan: Single Family Two(maximum density 15 units per haacre; minimum lot size 650 m2 /7,000

E.S.A. Designation: E.S.A.# 66 Murrayville Urban Area

BACKGROUND:

The subject site is designated Single Family Two in the Murrayville Community Pa maximum residential density of 15 units per hectare (6 units per acre), at a minof 650 m2 (7,000 ft2). The current SR-1 zoning is reflective of minimum lot sizes prior to development and the provision of full urban services. The subject lot is on(4) properties in the area that have not been rezoned to R-1D.


The proponent is applying to rezone approximately 0.40 ha (1.0 acre) of land locate49A Avenue to Residential Zone R-1D to accommodate a subsequent subdivisisingle family lots. The subject property is currently occupied by one single family



39/91

( )Page 8 . . .

Density:

The subject site is designated Single Family Two in the Murrayville Community P

a maximum density of 15 units per hectare (6 units per acre), at a minimum lot s(7,000 ft2). The applicant proposes a subsequent subdivision application of five (5)lots at a proposed density of 12 units per hectare (5 units per acre) with a minim650 m2 (7,000 ft2).

Subdivision:

A preliminary subdivision layout has been submitted in support of the rezoning creation of five (5) single family residential lots. The applicant has also prepared

block plan indicating the relationship of the subject site to the adjacent undevelopshown on the conceptual block plan, the introduction of a cul-de-sac to the blockfuture subdivision potential of these surrounding currently over-sized properties.details, including dedication of the cul-de-sac, will be addressed at time of subdivito the Subdivision and Development Control Bylaw and Policy.

Servicing:

There are no servicing requirements for the proposed rezoning. Existing services for the proposed use. At time of subdivision, a Servicing Agreement will be requconstruction of the east half of the proposed cul-de-sac (217A Street), installationmunicipal services (water, sanitary, storm) to service the proposed lots in accordTownships Subdivision and Development Control Bylaw, and erosion and sedworks in accordance with the Townships Erosion and Sediment Control Bylaw.

Tree Protection:

In compliance with the Tree Protection Bylaw, the applicant has submitted a tretree summary schedule indicating that there are three (3) significant trees located o

site. Based on the preliminary subdivision layout, all of the significant trees removed. As a result, the applicant will be required to plant 30 replacement tresubdivision. Registration of a non-disturbance restrictive covenant requiring that trees be removed or disturbed onsite (except where necessary for the installationuntil tree retention, protection and replacement details are addressed to the satisManager of Parks Design and Development at time of subdivision is required as final reading.

Transit:

Translink currently operates two Community Shuttles through Murrayville with Avenue, as well as a regular bus route along Fraser Highway. The road layout fhas been designed to accommodate future transit routes in accordance witoperating policy / procedures, which Council is given an opportunity to review each



40/91

Page 9 . . .

Schools:

The subject site is located within the catchment area for James Hill Eleme

approximately 1.5 kilometres southeast of the subject site. Langley FundamentaSchool is located 1 block north of the subject site. High school students will atSecondary School.

Parks:

There are two parks in the vicinity of the subject site. Denny Ross Memorial southeast of the site on Old Yale Road. Porter Park is located west of the site on 2

Development Prerequisites:Prior to final reading of the rezoning bylaw, the following items must be completed:

1. Registration of a non-disturbance restrictive covenant requiring that no sigbe removed or disturbed onsite (except where necessary for the installatiountil tree retention, protection and replacement details are addressed to thof the Manager of Parks Design and Development at time of subdivision;

2. Registration of a restrictive covenant requiring provision of an exterior dagreement to be entered into at the subdivision approval stage; and further,



Staff recommends approval of the rezoning application as the proposed developmwith the land use and density policies of the Murrayville Community Plan. Subdwill be addressed at the subdivision stage pursuant to the Townships SubDevelopment Control Bylaw and Policy.


Teresa HansonDEVELOPMENT PLANNERforCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

TEH/the

September 15, 2008Special Meeting for Public Hearing and Development Permits Minutes


41/91

p g g p

B. PUBLIC HEARING

3. Rezoning Application RZ100311(Jeannotte/Tanzite)Bylaw 4693Report 08-135File CD 11-06-0179

Township of Langley Zoning Bylaw 1987 No. 2500 Amendment (JEANNO

Bylaw 2008 No. 4693.

Explanation - Bylaw No. 4693

J. Geraghty, Manager Development Planning, explained that Bylaw No. 4rezones 0.40 ha (1 acre) of land located at 21726 49A Avenue to ResidR-1D to accommodate a five (5) lot single family subdivision. He noted thPublic Hearing notices were mailed to area residents.

Explanation by the proponent.

Quinn Jeannotte, 2201 204A Street, was in attendance and commentedto depth ratio, in-fill sites, impact of homes facing 49A Avenue, a root barrapplied to aid tree preservation, and advised that 38 additional trees woulplanted.

Councillor Bateman left the meeting at 8:15 p.m. and rejoined the meeting

8:17 p.m.

Submissions regarding Bylaw No. 4693 from the public.

1. Cleve Stordy, 21727 48A Avenue, was in attendance and commentehad made an enquiry at the Township of Langley to subdivide his propwas advised that he could not. He continued that Mr. Jeannotte met wMr. Stordy and his neighbours in early 2008, advising them of the propproject and possible consolidation of excess rear yard lots. He submi

signature petition in opposition of the proposal and attached an alternaproposal for development in the area. He expressed concerns relativlayout requiring removal of many existing structures, lot orientation, lacommunity planning, and lack of heritage consideration.

2. Kim Stordy, 21727 48A Avenue, was in attendance and commentedneighbourhood and community should work together to plan a develo

September 15, 2008Special Meeting for Public Hearing and Development Permits Minutes


42/91

B. PUBLIC HEARING

possibilities, and drainage issues.

5. Doug Speranza, 21693 46A Avenue, was in attendance and commehe had concerns relative to tree preservation, location of proposed roadrainage issues, and that he was opposed to the project.

6. Mr. and Mrs. David Lapierre, 4849 - 217B Street, were in attendance acommented that they had concerns relative to tree preservation, histoatmosphere, decrease in property value, and loss of privacy. Mrs. Lacontinued that she also spoke on behalf of Mrs. Pam Erickson at 2173

Avenue in saying that the neighbours would like to participate in a pubhouse.7. Doug Heck, 21679 - 48A Avenue, was in attendance and commented

was opposed to the proposal.8. Margaret Wallbank, 21665 48A Avenue, was in attendance and com

that she had concerns relative to lack of notification9. Robert Garden, 21651 48A Avenue was in attendance and commen

had concerns relative to lot layout and skewing of property lines, acceemergency vehicles, and advised that he was opposed to the proposa

Written Submissions regarding Bylaw No. 4693 from the public.

The following persons had expressed opposition in writing regarding BylaNo. 4693:

1. Opal and Robert Garden, 21651 48A Avenue2. Margaret and Lorne Wallbank, 21665 48A Avenue

3. Pat and Doug Heck, 21679 48A Avenue4. Barb and Vince Moropito, 4904 216 Street5. Laurel and Raymond Matthew, 21687 - 48A Avenue6. Kim and Doug Speranza, 21693 48A Avenue7. Kris and Doug Hyde, 21745 48A Avenue8. Kim and Cleve Stordy, 21727 48A Avenue.

Councillors Ferguson and Fox left the meeting at 8:42 p.m. and rejoined tat 8:43 p.m.

4. Rezoning Application RZ100307 andDevelopment Permit DP100542(Sherwood Park Homes Ltd.)Bylaw No. 4669Report 08 134

September 29, 2008Regular Council Meeting Minutes


43/91

G. BYLAWS FOR CONSIDERATION AT THIRD READING

Development;d) Landscaping and boulevard treatment to be secured by letter of credit a

building permit stage;e) Signage to be in substantial compliance with Schedule G;f) All garbage facilities to be located within buildings or screened;g) Rooftop mechanical equipment to be located so as not to be visible fro

roads, or alternatively to be screened from view by compatible architectreatments;

h) Compliance with the Townships Exterior Lighting Impact Policy (submiexterior lighting impact plan) to the acceptance of the Manager of PermLicences;

i) Submission of a final CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmentareport addressing incorporation of CPTED principles into the developmto the acceptance of the Manager of Development Planning.

Although not part of the Development Permit requirements, the applicant that prior to issuance of a building permit the following items will need to b

l) Payment of supplemental Development Permit application fees.CARRIED

Councillor Richter opposed

6. Rezoning Application RZ100311(Jeannotte / Tanzite)

Bylaw No. 4693Report 08-135File CD 11-06-0179

Moved by Councillor Long,Seconded by Councillor Ferguson,That Council give third reading to Township of Langley Zoning Bylaw 1982500 Amendment (JEANNOTTE) Bylaw 2008 No. 4693.

REFERRAL

Moved by Councillor Long,Seconded by Councillor Vickberg,That Rezoning Application RZ100311 (Jeannotte / Tanzite) be referred toaddress the comments received at the September 15 2008 Public Hearin


44/91


45/91


46/91


47/91


48/91


49/91


50/91


51/91


52/91


53/91


54/91


55/91


56/91


57/91


58/91


59/91


60/91


61/91


62/91


63/91


64/91


65/91


66/91


67/91


68/91


69/91


70/91


71/91


72/91


73/91


74/91


75/91


76/91


77/91


78/91


79/91


80/91


81/91


82/91


83/91


84/91


85/91


86/91


87/91


88/91


89/91

SUMMARY OF RESPONSES (FEBRUARY 5, 2009 OPEN HOUSE)


90/91

(NOTE: Some questionnaires were received from properties outside this ma

Subject

Prefer the Original Layout (half cul-de-sac subdivision plan) (4%)

Prefer the Alternate Layout (panhandle subdivision plan) (52%)

Prefer Neither Layout (37%)

Prefer Neither Layout, but Prefer the Alternate Layout over the Origina

No Response

H.1


91/91

89 of 89

ToL_09_14_09_Regular Council Agenda Package

Documents

Transcript of ToL_09_14_09_Regular Council Agenda Package