To BV or Not to BV

109
To BV or Not to BV: That is No Longer the Question, But Rather the Answer!

description

Course given at the AOA meet

Transcript of To BV or Not to BV

Page 1: To BV or Not to BV

To BV or Not to BV: That is No Longer the

Question, But Rather the Answer!

Page 2: To BV or Not to BV

Dominick M. Maino, OD, MEd, FAAO, FCOVD-A

Professor, Pediatrics/Binocular VisionIllinois Eye Institute

Illinois College of OptometryChicago, Il

Lyons Family Eye CareChicago, Il

Page 3: To BV or Not to BV

To BV or Not to BV: That is No Longer the Question, But Rather the Answer!

• ..Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous economics, or to take arms against a sea of troubles with binocular vision and optometric vision therapy. To grunt and sweat under a weary life, But that the dread of something unknown....the undiscovered country of BV and VT whose bourn all travelers prosper, doth not puzzle the will and makes us rather bear those joys we have...than those ills of 3rd party payers that we know not of? (With apologies to The Bard). This course reviews the diagnostic and evidence-based therapeutic procedures the primary care optometrist can use to improve patient care while supporting the fiscal stability of their practice.

Page 4: To BV or Not to BV
Page 5: To BV or Not to BV

Executive Summary

• Binocular vision in the news• 3D Vision Syndrome in the news• High incidence of BV problems• Evidence based medicine/research

supports optometric vision therapy

Page 6: To BV or Not to BV

Executive Summary

• Amblyopia can be treated at any age• Learning related vision problems

optometric intervention supported by research

• Attention and binocular vision problems related

Page 7: To BV or Not to BV

Executive Summary

• Our patients are in pain• Proven examination techniques

available• Proven intervention/therapy

available

Page 8: To BV or Not to BV

Executive Summary

• The myths of OVT wrong• Expand your patient base• Be unique• Offer more

Page 9: To BV or Not to BV

BV Dx & Tx in the News!!

Page 10: To BV or Not to BV

BV Dx & Tx in the News!!

Page 11: To BV or Not to BV

BV Dx & Tx in the News!!

Page 12: To BV or Not to BV

BV Dx & Tx in the News!!

10/97

Page 13: To BV or Not to BV

Non-strabismic BV disorders

Prevalence/Incidence

• Convergence Insufficiency: 1.3% to 37% of the population; most report 3-5%

• Convergence Excess: ~6%• Accommodative disorders: 3-5%

Page 14: To BV or Not to BV

Non-strabismic BV disorders

• Convergence Insufficiency: 1.3% to 37% of the population; most report 3-5%

• 309,000,000 people in USA (2010 Census) at 5% = 15 million +

Page 15: To BV or Not to BV

Non-strabismic BV disorders

• Convergence Excess: ~6%

• 18 million +

Page 16: To BV or Not to BV

Non-strabismic BV disorders

• Accommodative disorders: 3-5%

• 15 million +

Page 17: To BV or Not to BV

Non-strabismic BV disorders

• If any other disease had this prevalence, it would be considered an epidemic…if not a pandemic!

Page 18: To BV or Not to BV

Subjective Complaints of Patients with BV Disorders

• Blur• Headache• Aesthenopia• Diplopia• These complaints are usually

associated with near work

Page 19: To BV or Not to BV

Subjective Complaints of Patients with BV Disorders

• Blur

• Headache• Aesthenopia• Diplopia• These complaints are usually

associated with near work

Page 20: To BV or Not to BV

Subjective Complaints of Patients with BV Disorders

• Blur• Headache• Aesthenopia• Diplopia• These complaints are usually

associated with near work

Page 21: To BV or Not to BV

Subjective Complaints of Patients with BV Disorders

• Blur• Headache• Aesthenopia• Diplopia• These complaints are usually

associated with near work

Page 22: To BV or Not to BV

Visual Efficiency Examination: Basic Tests

•History•Visual Acuity

20/97

Page 23: To BV or Not to BV

Visual Efficiency Examination: Basic Tests

• Refractive Evaluation (Objective/Subjective)

20/97

Page 24: To BV or Not to BV

Visual Efficiency Examination: Basic Tests

• Oculomotor –Cover Test, Hirschberg, –Kappa, Krimsky, Bruckner–EOMs–NPC (with red lens)

20/97

Page 25: To BV or Not to BV

Visual Efficiency Examination: Basic Tests

• Heterophoria• Vergences

–Sheard’s criteria•Need twice your phoria in reserve (10 pd exophore at near needs 20 pd BO reserves)

Page 26: To BV or Not to BV

Visual Efficiency Examination: Basic Tests

• Accommodative Tests –Minimum amplitude =

15 - (0.25) age•So a 20 year old should have at least 10 diopters of accommodation

Page 27: To BV or Not to BV

Visual Efficiency Examination: Basic Tests

–NRA/PRA, Minus Lens Amplitudes

Page 28: To BV or Not to BV

Visual Efficiency Examination: Basic Tests

–Push Up/Pull Away Amplitudes, MEM–Facility

Page 29: To BV or Not to BV

Basic tests

• Stereopsis• Random Dot,• Stereo Fly

• Less than

70 seconds of arc

Page 30: To BV or Not to BV

Basic tests

• Worth 4 Dot• Fixation Disparity Testing

–Wesson Card, –Bernell Fixation

Disparity (Associated Phoria),

Disparometer

Page 31: To BV or Not to BV

Common BV Syndromes

• Convergence Insufficiency–Most common syndrome–Symptoms: aesthenopia,

headaches, blur, diplopia, loss of concentration• associated with near work• often occur near the end of the day

Page 32: To BV or Not to BV

Convergence Insufficiency

• Signs:–An exodeviation at near

• Can even be an intermittent exotropia at near

–Receded NPC value• NPC larger than 10 cm

–Reduced BO vergences at near• Often fail to meet Sheard’s criterion

Page 33: To BV or Not to BV

Convergence Excess

• Symptoms: Diplopia, headaches, aesthenopia– almost always near related

• Signs:– Esophoria at near

• Use detailed accommodative target or you may miss the esophoria

– Vergences• BI vergences at near may not compensate

Page 34: To BV or Not to BV

Convergence Excess

• Signs–Dynamic Retinoscopy

• May be the most significant test• Typically a high lag of accommodation• Lag may be +1.00 to +2.00 DS at 40

cm• Lags greater than +2.50 D at 40 cm

should suggest uncorrected hyperopia

Page 35: To BV or Not to BV

Fusional Vergence Dysfunction

• Symptoms: aesthenopia, headaches, blurred vision (Binocular Vision/Visual Discomfort Dx)–Associated with reading or near work

• Signs: –Phorias: Normal at distance and near–Reduced BI and BO vergences at

distance and/or near

Page 36: To BV or Not to BV

Accommodative Disorders

• Symptoms: blur, headache, aesthenopia, fatigue when reading, difficulty changing focus from one distance to another

Page 37: To BV or Not to BV

Accommodative Disorders• Signs

–Accommodative Insufficiency: • Reduced amplitude of accommodation• Minimum Accommodation:

15 - (0.25) (age)–Accommodative Infacility

• Failure of monocular facility testing• Expected value: 11 cpm

Page 38: To BV or Not to BV

Other BV Disorders

• Divergence Excess–Prevalence of ~0.5 to 4%–Exophoria greater at distance than

near–Frequently first discovered in grade

school

30/97

Page 39: To BV or Not to BV

Other BV Disorders

• Divergence Insufficiency–Very rare!–Esophoria greater at distance than near–Be careful to rule out lateral rectus

palsy!

30/97

Page 40: To BV or Not to BV

Strabismus & Amblyopia

3-5% of the population

Tx appropriate at all ages

May do out of office VT

and achieve success!

Page 41: To BV or Not to BV

Amblyopia

Pathological until proven otherwise

Infants/Toddlers

Young Children

Busy Adults

Amblyogenic Factors

Anisometropia

Bilateral Refractive Error

Strabismus (Constant)

Page 42: To BV or Not to BV

Amblyopia

Legal Consultant

AmblyopiaMalpractice case was not because of missing

an eye disease…But rather due to alleged inappropriate management/treatment

Page 43: To BV or Not to BV

Treatment for BV Disorders

Evidence Based Medicine

Ciuffreda KJ. The scientific basis for and efficacy of optometric vision therapy in non-strabismic accommodative and vergence disorders. Optometry.

2002;73(12):735-62

Scheimann M et al. A randomized clinical trial of vision therapy/orthoptics versus pencil pushups for the treatment of convergence insufficiency in young adults. Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Jul;82(7):583-95.

…vision therapy/orthoptics was the only treatment that produced clinically significant improvements in the near point of convergence and positive fusional vergence.

Page 44: To BV or Not to BV

Treatment for BV Disorders

Evidence Based Medicine

Scheimann M et al. Randomised clinical trial of the effectiveness of base-in prism reading glasses versus placebo reading glasses for symptomatic convergence insufficiency in children. Br J Ophthal 2005;89(10):1318-23.

Base-in prism reading glasses were found to be no more effective in alleviating symptoms, improving the near point of convergence, or improving positive fusional vergence at near than placebo reading glasses for the treatment of children aged 9 to <18 years with symptomatic CI.

Page 45: To BV or Not to BV

Treatment for BV Disorders

Evidence Based Medicine

Solan H et al. M-cell deficit and reading disability: a preliminary study of the effects of temporal vision-processing therapy. Optometry. 2004 Oct;75(10):640-50.

This research supports the value of rendering temporal vision therapy to children identified as moderately reading disabled (RD). The diagnostic procedures and the dynamic therapeutic techniques discussed in this article have not been previously used for the specific purpose of ameliorating an M-cell deficit. Improved temporal visual-processing skills and enhanced visual motion discrimination appear to have a salutary effect on magnocellular processing and reading comprehension in RD children with M-cell deficits.

Page 46: To BV or Not to BV

Treatment for BV Disorders

Evidence Based MedicineSolan H et al. Is there a common linkage among reading comprehension, visual attention, and magnocellular processing? J Learn Disabil. 2007 May-Jun;40(3):270-8.

Solan H et al. Role of visual attention in cognitive control of oculomotor readiness in students with reading disabilities. Learn Disabil. 2001 Mar-Apr;34(2):107-18.

Eye movement therapy improved eye movements and also resulted in significant gains in reading comprehension.

Page 47: To BV or Not to BV

Treatment for BV Disorders

Evidence Based Medicine

Cotter S et al. Treatment of strabismic amblyopia with refractive correction. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jun;143(6):1060-3. These results support the suggestion from a prior study that strabismic amblyopia can improve and even resolve with spectacle correction alone.

Page 48: To BV or Not to BV

Treatment for BV Disorders

Evidence Based Medicine

Scheimann M et al. Randomized trial of treatment of amblyopia in children aged 7 to 17 years. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Apr;123(4):437-47. Amblyopia improves with optical correction alone in about one fourth of patients aged 7 to 17 years, although most patients who are initially treated with optical correction alone will require additional treatment for amblyopia. For patients aged 7 to 12 years, prescribing 2 to 6 hours per day of patching with near visual activities and atropine can improve visual acuity even if the amblyopia has been previously treated. For patients 13 to 17 years, prescribing patching 2 to 6 hours per day with near visual activities may

improve visual acuity when amblyopia has not been previously treated

Page 49: To BV or Not to BV

Levi DM. Prentice award lecture 2011: removing the brakes on plasticity in the amblyopic brain.Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Jun;89(6):827-38.

Video-game play induces plasticity in the visual system of adults with amblyopia.Li RW, Ngo C, Nguyen J, Levi DM.PLoS Biol. 2011 Aug;9(8):e1001135. Epub 2011 Aug 30.

Prolonged perceptual learning of positional acuity in adult amblyopia: perceptual template retuning dynamics.Li RW, Klein SA, Levi DM.J Neurosci. 2008 Dec 24;28(52):14223-9.

Adult Amblyopia

Page 50: To BV or Not to BV

Treatment for BV Disorders

• Treatment modalities– Lenses– Prisms– Vision therapy

• Traditional therapy• Computer therapy

40/97

Page 51: To BV or Not to BV

Lenses as Treatment Best Rx (clarity, comfort, function)

Refractive Error Amblyopia Concern

Binocularity Concerns

Interference with Learning

Rx if….

Myopia >5.00D Under correct eso/Fully correct exo

Depends on child’s age

>5.00D (any age)

>3.00D @>1yr

Hyperopia >2.00D Under correct exo/Fully correct eso

>2.50D >2.00D

Astigmatism >1.25D Depends on VA

>1.25D

Anisometropia >1.00D Monitor BV/Stereo

>1.00D >1.00D

Page 52: To BV or Not to BV

Lenses as Treatment

• Best Rx (clarity, comfort, function)

• Accommodative disorders– Can prescribe reading only Rx or an

add

• Exodeviations – Overminusing (DE)– Not usually a first choice! Give add

Page 53: To BV or Not to BV

Bifocals for Kids

Bifocal Seg Height

Infants/Toddlers

Pre-schoolers

Bi-sect pupil

Page 54: To BV or Not to BV

Bifocals for Kids

Bifocal Seg Height

3-5 Years

Bottom 1/3 of Pupil

Page 55: To BV or Not to BV

Bifocals for Kids

Bifocal Seg Height

> 5yrs

Bottom of Pupil

Page 56: To BV or Not to BV

Bifocals for Myopia Progression

Gwiazda JE, Hyman L, Norton TT, Hussein ME, Marsh-Tootle W, Manny R, Wang Y, Everett D; COMET Grouup.

Accommodation and related risk factors associated with myopia progression and their interaction with treatment in COMET children.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Jul;45(7):2143-51.

Page 57: To BV or Not to BV

Bifocals for Myopia Progression

PALs were effective in slowing progression in these children, with statistically significant 3-year treatment effects. The results support the COMET rationale (i.e., a role for retinal defocus in myopia progression). In clinical practice in the United States children with large lags of accommodation and near esophoria often are prescribed PALs or bifocals to improve visual performance. Results of this study suggest that such children, if myopic, may have an additional benefit of slowed progression of myopia.

Page 58: To BV or Not to BV

Polycarbonate/Trivex Lenses

Page 59: To BV or Not to BV

Prism as Treatment

• Can be used with CI, CE, DI, DE, Vertical Deviations

• Prescribe the least amount of prism needed– Determine the associated phoria with a Wesson

Card or Bernell Box

• Fresnel Prism trial, then Rx

Page 60: To BV or Not to BV

Optometric Vision Therapy as Treatment

• The approach of choice for CI, Fusional Vergence Dysfunctions, accommodative disorders, and Amblyopia– High chance of success with these disorders– Results are typically long lasting– Often can treat these disorders using primarily

home VT with in-office check-ups

50/97

Page 61: To BV or Not to BV

Vision Therapy as Treatment

• Traditional therapy– Hand-eye, Vergence and Accommodative

procedures

• Computer Therapy– Can attack hand-eye, vergence, accommodative

and oculomotor problems (Vision information processing anomalies?)

Page 62: To BV or Not to BV

Vision Therapy for Amblyopia

• Prescribe Rx

• Implement occlusion therapy

• Active optometric vision therapy

• Monitor

• Change Rx/Tx as needed

Page 63: To BV or Not to BV

Period of Sensitivityvs

Period of Plasticity

Page 64: To BV or Not to BV

Atropine

Repka MX, Cotter SA, Beck RW, Kraker RT, Birch EE, Everett DF, Hertle RW, Holmes JM, Quinn GE, Sala NA, Scheiman MM, Stager DR Sr, Wallace DK; A randomized trial of atropine regimens for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children.Ophthalmology. 2004 Nov;111(11):2076-85.

Page 65: To BV or Not to BV

Atropine

CONCLUSIONS: Weekend atropine provides an improvement in VA of a magnitude similar to that of the improvement provided by daily atropine in treating moderate amblyopia in children 3 to 7 years old.

Page 66: To BV or Not to BV

Atropine

Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. The course of moderate amblyopia treated with atropine in children: experience of the amblyopia treatment study.Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Oct;136(4):630-9.

Page 67: To BV or Not to BV

Atropine

A beneficial effect of atropine is present throughout the age range of 3 years old to younger than 7 years old, and with an acuity range of 20/40 to 20/100. A shift in near fixation to the amblyopic eye is not essential for atropine to be effective in all cases. Sound eye acuity should be monitored when a plano spectacle lens is prescribed for the sound eye to augment the treatment effect of atropine.

Page 68: To BV or Not to BV

Occlusion TherapyAge (yrs) Per Day Schedule Minimum Exam

Frequency

1 4 60min periods 1 day on/1 day off Weekly

2 3 30min periods 2 day on/1 day off Every 2 wks

3 3 30min periods 3 day on/1 day off Every 3 wks

4 2 60min periods 4 day on/1 day off Every 4 wks

5 2 60min periods 5 day on/1 day off Every 5 wks

6 2 60min periods 6 day on/1 day off Every 6 wks

Page 69: To BV or Not to BV

Amblyopia Therapy

What do we know about amblyopia?–More than decreased VA–Visual-Spatial affects–Accommodation–Hand-eye–Stereopsis

Page 70: To BV or Not to BV

Active Vision Therapy

Hand-eye

Oculomotor

Accommodation

Have child “Do Stuff”

Interact with environment60/97

Page 71: To BV or Not to BV

Roberts CJ, Adams GG. Contact lenses in the management of high anisometropic amblyopia. EYE. 2004;18(1):109-10

CONCLUSIONS: High anisometropic amblyopia is challenging to treat. In our study contact lenses improved visual acuity in myopic anisometropia of up to 9 dioptres.

Page 72: To BV or Not to BV

Vision Therapy as Treatment

Phases of Therapy• Monocular (HE, OM, ACC)• Biocular (HE, OM, ACC, Anti-suppression)• Binocular (Vergence, Acc)• Integration/Stabilization

Do it all at the same time!

Page 73: To BV or Not to BV

Vision Therapy as Treatment

Phases of Therapy• Monocular (HE, OM, ACC)• Biocular (HE, OM, ACC, Anti-suppression)• Binocular (Vergence, Acc)• Integration/Stabilization

Do it all at the same time!

Page 74: To BV or Not to BV

Vision Therapy as Treatment

Phases of Therapy• Monocular (HE, OM, ACC)• Biocular (HE, OM, ACC, Anti-suppression)• Binocular (Vergence, Acc)• Integration/Stabilization

Do it all at the same time!

Page 75: To BV or Not to BV

Vision Therapy as Treatment

Phases of Therapy• Monocular (HE, OM, ACC)• Biocular (HE, OM, ACC, Anti-suppression)• Binocular (Vergence, Acc)• Integration/Stabilization

Do it all at the same time!

Page 76: To BV or Not to BV

Vision Therapy as Treatment

Phases of Therapy• Monocular (HE, OM, ACC)• Biocular (HE, OM, ACC, Anti-suppression)• Binocular (Vergence, Acc)• Integration/Stabilization

Do it all at the same time!

Page 77: To BV or Not to BV

Traditional Therapy Procedures

• Hand-Eye Procedures– mazes– dot to dot– cutting– coloring– filling in O’s

Page 78: To BV or Not to BV

Traditional Therapy Procedures

• Vergence procedures– Brock String– Lifesaver card– Anaglyph Series (BC920, others)

• Accommodative Procedures– Minus lens dips– Flippers– Hart Chart

Page 79: To BV or Not to BV

Vergence Procedures

Brock String

Simple

Inexpensive

Easy

Effective

Page 80: To BV or Not to BV

Vergence Procedures

Life Saver Cards

BO and BI

Good fusion

Anti-suppression

Inexpensive

Effective

70/97

Page 81: To BV or Not to BV

Vergence Procedures

Fusion Cards

Random dot targets

BC 920, BC 50

Anaglyph series

Page 82: To BV or Not to BV

Vergence Procedures

Aperture Rule

“Flying W”

Stereoscopes

Page 83: To BV or Not to BV

Accommodative Procedures

Rock Card

Flippers

Anti-suppression

Page 84: To BV or Not to BV

Accommodative Procedures

Hart Chart

the old standby

Page 85: To BV or Not to BV

Computer Vision Therapy

• Can attack vergence, accommodative, and oculomotor problems

• Most programs are set up to record patient’s performance each session– Removes the problem of compliance!

• Different products on the market– Home Therapy System– Computer Aided Vision Therapy– Psychological Software Services

Page 86: To BV or Not to BV

Computer Vision Therapy

• Patient can use at home, work, wherever they have access to computer

• Trains eye movements, vergences, accommodation, and perceptual skills

Page 87: To BV or Not to BV

Why use Computer Aided VT?

• “I’d like to do VT in my practice, but...”• Patients who cannot afford office VT• Patients who cannot make a time

commitment for office VT• Patient compliance problems• Insurance or Third Party Problems

Page 88: To BV or Not to BV

How do you incorporate Computer Aided Vision

Therapy in your practice ?

• Diagnose the patient!!!• Assign a therapy protocol • Computer aided VT in the office• Schedule follow-up appointments• Evaluate the patient’s progress/Follow-up

Page 89: To BV or Not to BV

Computer Aided VT Resources

Neuroscience Center of Indianapolis

http://www.neuroscience.cnter.com/

Page 90: To BV or Not to BV

Computer Aided VT Resources

Computer Orthoptics

HTS (Home Therapy System)

http://www.homevisiontherapy.com/

80/97

Page 91: To BV or Not to BV

Computer Aided VT Resources

Computerized Aided Vision Therapy

Gary Vogel, OD, FAAOAvailable from Bernell

800-348-2225http://www.bernell.com/

Page 92: To BV or Not to BV

Brainware Safari

http://www.brainwareforyou.com/

Page 93: To BV or Not to BV

Brainware Safari

Helms D, Sawtelle SM. A study of the effectiveness of cognitive therapy delivered in a video game format. Optom Vis Dev 2007;38(1):19-26.

Students in the study group showed an average of 4 years and 3 months improvement on tests of cognitive skills, compared to 4 months improvement for the control group and showed an average of 1 year and 11 months improvement on tests of achievement compared to 1 month for the control group.

http://www.brainwareforyou.com/

Page 94: To BV or Not to BV

Conclusions

• Easy way to incorporate VT for BV disorders into your practice

• Monitor the output to check for compliance and tricks!

• Remember that the key is in diagnosing patients and follow-up

Page 95: To BV or Not to BV

VT Equipment

Use the tools discussed

You do not need a whole room of

VT “stuff”

85/97

Page 96: To BV or Not to BV

WWW Sites for BV/VT

Gemstonevision.Org

Page 97: To BV or Not to BV

BV Organizations

COVD http://www.covd.org/

OEP http://www.oep.org/

949-250-8070

AAO BV Section http://www.aaopt.org/sections/bvppo/aaobvp.html 301-984-1441

Page 98: To BV or Not to BV

BV Organizations

PAVE/Parents Active

for Vision Education

http://www.pave-eye.com/

Neuro-Optometric

Rehabilitation Association

http://www.noravc.com/

Page 99: To BV or Not to BV

Patient WWW Sites

3 D Pictures

http://www.vision3d.com/optical/

index.shtml#stereogram

How Does Binocular Vision Work?

http://www.vision3d.com/stereo.html

Page 101: To BV or Not to BV

Position Statement on VTAOA, AAO, COVD many others:

Position Statement on

Optometric Vision Therapy

“The American Optometric Association affirms its long standing position that optometric vision

therapy is effective in the treatment of physiological, neuromuscular and perceptual

dysfunctions of the vision system……..”

Page 102: To BV or Not to BV

Practice Management

Myths

VT is Too Expensive!

You Can’t Make Money Doing VT!

Which is it? Can’t have it both ways!

Page 103: To BV or Not to BV

Practice Management

FirstComprehensive Examination

ThenVisual EfficiencyStrab/Amblyopia

Follow-up

Page 104: To BV or Not to BV

Practice Management

All BV Disorders are a Medical Condition

CI, CE, DI, DE, Pursuit/Saccade Dysfunction

Page 105: To BV or Not to BV

Practice Management

Accommodative disorders tend to be refractive

Accommodative insufficiency, excess, infacility, instability, etc

95/97

Page 106: To BV or Not to BV

Practice Management

Visual Discomfort

is a medical diagnosis

Page 107: To BV or Not to BV
Page 108: To BV or Not to BV

All Ages Can Benefit….

More PatientsBetter Patient CareEvidenced Based

Do it!

Page 109: To BV or Not to BV

Questions? Contact:

Dominick M. Maino, OD, MEd, FAAO, FCOVD-A

Professor, Pediatric/Binocular Vision ServiceIllinois Eye Institute/Illinois College of Optometry

3241 S. Michigan Ave. Chicago, Il. 60610312-949-7280 voice 312-949-7668 fax

Private Practice 773-935-2020

[email protected]

www.LyonsFamilyEyeCare.com www.ico.edu