To be, or well be, II Teknologiat osana palveluprosessin muutosta
description
Transcript of To be, or well be, II Teknologiat osana palveluprosessin muutosta
To be, or well be, II
Teknologiat osana palveluprosessin muutosta
Jaana Tuominen, GE Healthcare
GE Healthcare
3 /GE
Technologies Bio-Sciences
Molecular Diagnostics
Information Technology
Pharmaceutical Solutions
Imaging and Intervention
GE Healthcare: A Unique Collection of Expertise…
…creating advanced diagnostics
4 /GE
Need a fundamental change …
50% die after 1st heart attack
Heart DiseaseOne person in three
will have cancer
Cancer20% aged 75-84 suffer from
Alzheimer’s disease
Brain Disorders
5 /GE
A new age of medicine
21st Century Personalized HealthcarePredict Diagnose Inform Treat
6 /GE
If we can detect it here,
it may never appear here.
7 /GE
Predict
See the future.Change the future.
Molecular understanding of diseases
A new generation of diagnostics
Identify the “genetic fingerprints” of disease
Predict disease before the onset
8 /GE
Diagnose
The earlier you detect disease,the earlier you can deal with it.
Transformational medical imaging and medical diagnosticsVisualize and analyze disease at a molecular levelDiagnose disease more precisely – based on the individual patientImprove patient outcomes
9 /GE
Inform
Enable better care through molecular knowledge.
Provide life-critical patient information – when, where and how it’s neededEmpower through information about “genetic signatures”Tailor treatment to the patientMonitor and manage the efficacy of personalized therapy
10 /GE
Treat
Read the genes.Tailor the treatment.
Understand disease at a molecular level
Develop more targeted and effective therapies
Enable the development of new, more targeted drugs… faster
11 /GE
GE Healthcare Vision
At GE Healthcare, We Strive to See Life More Clearly
We Help Predict, Diagnose, Inform and Treat So That Every Individual Can Live
Life to the Fullest
The Emerging Era of Chronic Disease
13 /GE
Response Needed for a New Era
1900-1950 Era of Infectious Disease Care
1950-2000 Era of Acute Care
2000-2050 Era of Chronic Care
Era of Chronic Care requires collection and management of patient medical information outside of the traditional hospital setting.
14 /GE
Population Managing Multiple DiseasesMedical progress often turns an acute condition into a chronic one. Ex: 40% decline in mortality from coronary heart disease since 1980, but more people are living with survival effects. A chronic condition lasts more than one year, limits a patient’s abilities and requires ongoing care. Chronic conditions include:
• Cardiovascular disease • Diabetes• Hypertension• End-stage renal disease (ESRD)• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)• Osteoporosis
• Arthritis• Some types of cancers• Asthma• Neurodegenerative disorders (Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, etc.)• Chronic pain• Stroke and other brain injuries
15 /GE
Chronic Health Impact
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Hospital Stays
InpatientAdmits
Home CareVisits
Physician Visits
EmergencyRoom Visits
Patients With Chronic Conditions Account For:
55%
66%
96%
60%
80%1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.3
2.5
2.7
2.9
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020
Mill
ions
of P
atie
nts
Supply
Demand
US Supply & Demand for Registered NursesPending Dr. & RN Shortage Rising Costs of Healthcare
Quality of Care Dilemma
$211$2 394
$4 701
$12 973
None Two Three Four
Medicare ExpendituresPer # of Chronic Conditions
• 60 Million Americans with 1 Chronic Disease
• 157 Million Americans with 1 by 2020
• Medicare Insolvency by 2019
• Direct Costs $510 Billion, to $1.07 Trillion, 2020
• 80% of Healthcare Costs on 20% of Population
• Chronic consuming 70% of Prescription Drugs
Ambulatory Care – to address chronic diseases
17 /GE
Ambulatory Care
Chronic patient, managed at
home
Congestive Heart Failure
Ambulatory diagnostic device + connection to
physician & EMR
Asthma and COPD
Therapeutic dose monitoring
+
Address KeyDisease States… Ambulatory Monitoring…
Enables early intervention Improves patient outcomes Reduces hospitalization costs Increases Cost Savings Increases patient compliance Improves provider productivity Improves quality of life
MSU Telehealth Case Study:
Ambulatory Monitoring Solution reduced…
Total Bed Utilization 55%
CHF Patient Hospital Utilization 43%
Urgent Care Visits 35%
18 /GE
Market Drivers• Aging population
• Acute conditions chronic conditionsAcute intervention managed care
• Increasing patient consumerism - “Worried well”
• Need for cost reductions in healthcare systems
• Changes in reimbursement to encourage outpatient care
• Improvement in communications access(Source: F&S 2004 US RPM)www.cybernetmedical.comwww.medscape.com
19 /GE
Market Restraints• High cost and inflexibility of products
• Limited scope of reimbursement
• Documentation of outcomes
• Legal issues (e.g. state licensure issues)
• Lack of standardization of clinical protocols
• Privacy concerns
• Tight budgets with home health care
• Lack of physician acceptance (Source: F&S 2004 US RPM)www.cybernetmedical.comwww.medscape.com
20 /GE
Product Needs• Low cost
• Flexibility
• Ease of Use (single button, voice prompts)
• Unbreakable
• Designed for home environment
• Communications requirements
Key CHF Parameters…
•Weight
•SPO2
•ECG
•Heart Rhythm
•Blood Pressure
•Drug Compliance
•Activity Level
•Nutrition/Diet
21 /GE
Remote Patient Monitoring Overview
Sensing
• Smart alerts• Wireless platform • Information portal • Telecommunication
Information interface Customer interfaceData management
Non-professional caregivers
Professional caregivers
Alertee (e.g., FNP)
Physician
Data alert
Configured
Data
Data
EMR/ Patient dashboard
Central platform
Algorithm
Home hub
Data
Results
PC/TV
Network / DataPre-prosessing
•Novel algorithms, modeling
•Existing algorithms
•Decision Support
•Configurable Alerts
•EMR Integration•Patient Access
• Non-invasive sensors
• Novel Parameters
• Drug Compliance
•Patient Triage •Educate Patient•Engage Family
Patient
Remote monitoring and viewing – opportunities in the near future
23 /GE
The story of Joe Doe
Telemetry patient John Doe is going to have a cup of coffee in the hospital cafeteria.
14:32:23
RN M. Smith receives the ‘ST high’ alarm in her PDA. She checks the snapshot, acknowledges the message and hurries to the patient.
14:32:28
24 /GE
After examination she decides to consult Dr. S. Jones who is the physician in charge of John Doe.
14:33:32
The message shows the snapshot and RN Smith’s request for advice
14:33:55
25 /GE
After looking at the John Doe’s snapshot and real-time and trended data, Dr. Jones gives care instructions to RN Smith
RN Smith makes the lab test order electronically with her PDA
14:35:12 14:36:38
26 /GE
The lab results are ready and they are sent to Dr. Jones automatically by the system
Dr. Jones makes the drug order with his PDA, and sends it to RN Smith
15:17:09 15:17:09
27 /GE
RN Smith receives the drug order and administers the drug in John Doe’s IV bag
RN Smith documents the drug treatment utilizing the bar code scanner that is built-in her PDA
15:21:17 15:22:50
29 /GE