THURSDAY, JULY 10, 2003 - Vaughan · PROPOSAL. The subject lands are zoned R1, Residential, under...

of 30

The Minutes of the 12TH Meeting of the Vaughan Committee of Adjustment

for the year 2003 THURSDAY, JULY 10, 2003

6:00p.m. Present at the meeting were: M. Mauti K. Connell T. DeCicco L. Fluxgold S. Perrella Members of Staff present: Dianne E.L. Grout, Secretary-Treasurer Anne Markovsky, Assistant to the Secretary-Treasurer Glenn White, Planner Gregory Seganfreddo, Plans Examiner INTRODUCTION OF ADDENDUM REPORTS MOVED by S. Perrella Seconded by L. Fluxgold That the addendum reports be incorporated into the minutes and be on view at the back of the room in the Report Book. CARRIED DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST None. ADOPTION OR CORRECTION OF MINUTES MOVED by S. Perrella Seconded by L. Fluxgold THAT the minutes of the Committee of Adjustment Meeting of Thursday, June 26, 2003, BE CORRECTED as follows: COLUMN 3 OF THE NAMES OF THE PETITION WERE MISSING. MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING: (PREVIOUSLY ADJOURNED FROM MAY 15 & MAY 29, 2003 MEETINGS ITEM # 4. FILE NO: A103/03

WAR TORN EUROPE HOLDINGS INC. Letters and petitions of supports were received from the following:

COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES JULY 10, 2003

of 30

John Di Zazzo 17 Colton Cres. South Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 3L6

A103/03

Sandra Georgiou 151 Cherhill Drive Maple, Ontario L6A 1H8

A103/03

Nella Chiappetta 38 Crown Cres. Woodbridge, Ontario L4H 1S7

A103/03

Sonia Scalfari 89 Royal Ridge Cres. Maple, Ontario L6A 2T1

A103/03

Sonia Ceci

57 Cherhill Drive Maple, Ontario L6A 1H6

A103/03

Sharon DiPasquale 5 Colton Cres. South Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 3L7

A103/03

Patricia Giampietro 23 Giovanni Way Woodbridge, Ontario L4H 1R7

A103/03

Robert Mastronardi 149 Jules Ave. Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 1Y2

A103/03

Linda Grancri 50 Tierra Ave. Maple, Ontario L6A 2Z4

A103/03

Josie Tedesco 44 Rossmull Cres. Woodbridge, Ontario L6A 2Z4

A103/03

Frank Santaguida 57 Carstad Cres. Woodbridge, Ontario L4H 1H5

A103/03

Sunnybrook & Women’s Health Sciences Centre Attn: Neal Westeich, Div. of Psychiatry2075 Bayview Ave

Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5 A103/03Luana Belo

41 Timberwolf Cres. Vaughan, Ontario L4H 2W2

A103/03

Rita Cancelliere 145 Lime Drive Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 5P4

A103/03

Filomena & Emanuele Fraietta 33 Kilmarnoch Avenue Maple, Ontario L6A 2G2

A103/03

Maria DiGirolamo 1 Colton Cres. North Woodbridge Ontario L4L 3L6

A103/03

Tanya & Angela Zezza 275 Forest Drive Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 3W7

A103/03

The Miceli Family 101 Bestview Cres. Maple, Ontario L6A 3T1

A103/03

Paolo Dove 99 Bestview Cres. Maple, Ontario L6A 3T1

A103/03

Joe Aquino 34 Cooperage Road Kleinburg, Ontario L0J 1C0

A103/03

David Aquino 39 Paula Court Kleinburg, Ontario L0J 1C0

A103/03

Francesco Serpe 90 Lois Drive Woodbridge, Ontario L4H 1H9

A103/03

Y. McCullough 72 Granger St. Maple, Ontario L6A 1B4

A103/03

Anna Iozzo 11 Marco Sgotto Avenue Woodbridge, Ontario L4H 1P9 A103/03

Maria Cara 172 Silverado Trail Woodbridge, Ontario L4H 2N9 A103/03

Mary Riccio 260 Regina Road Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 2G8 A103/03

Lori D’Amico 70 Marco Sgotto Avenue Woodbridge, Ontario L4H 1P7 A103/03

Silvana Greco 121 Fonteselva Ave. Woodbridge, Ontario L4H 1Y8 A103/03

Mirella Bucci 143 Mondavi Road Woodbridge, Ontario L4H 1L5 A103/03

Josie Barone 154 Woodbridge Avenue Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 2S7 A103/03

Occupant 75 Modesto Gardens Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 8E1 A103/03

Pina Margarit 51 Cloverhill Court Maple, Ontario L6A 3L9 A103/03

Occupant 71 Keefer Court Thornhill, Ontario L4J 5Y5 A103/03

Evonne Carata 37 Olympia Gate Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 5K3 A103/03

Daniella Sforza-Scarano 123 Freemont St. Concord, Ontario L4K 5H8 A103/03

Lisa Gillis-Kiziak 9025 River Rd. W. RR#1 Palgrave, Ontario L0N 1P0 A103/03


of 30

Anna Barone 28 Signet Way Woodbridge, Ontario L4H 2E3 A103/03

Laura Spensieri 79 Collard Drive King City, Ontario L7B 1E3 A103/03

Alberto Albano 5 Coalbrook Court Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 9B7 A103/03

John Koe 20 Irish Moss Crt Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 3W8 A103/03

Fern Scianitti 25 Sonny St. Maple, Ontario L6A 1B4 A103/03

Charlene McGuire 250 Pine Grove Rd Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 9M6 A103/03

Rita Altieri 365 Aberdeen Ave. Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 4B7 A103/03

Carol Bancheri 138 Dante Court Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 7X2 A103/03

Ermanno Michele Ferrara 18 Admiral Court Woodbridge, Ontario L4H 1G1 A103/03

Yvonne Kehm 108 Canyon Hill Ave. Richmond Hill, Ontario L4C 0K5 A103/03

Sandra Foster 51 Wyatt Lane Aurora, Ontario L4G 7E4 A103/03

Sam Manasseri 127 Gaslight Cres. Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 8G1 A103/03

Domenic Naccarato 63 Lime Drive Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 5N4 A103/03

Linda Girardo 106 Angelina Ave. Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 8N9 A103/03

Pam Barrow 55 Barondale Drive, Unit 8 Mississauga, Ontario L4Z 3P9 A103/03

Carmela De Thomasis 97 Castle Park Blvd. Woodbridge, Ontario L4H 2R7 A103/03

Carmela Santamieri 231 Siderno Cres. Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 9M8 A103/03

Stephanie Danese 240 Forest Drive Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 3T5 A103/03

Erry Carano 132 Oliver Lane Maple, Ontario L6A 1B1

A103/03

Lara Antonini 217 Southview Drive Concord, Ontario L4K 2K9

A103/03

Andrea Rigabon 39 Grenadier Cr. Thornhill, Ontario L4J 7V7

A103/03

John Battaglia 11 Harbour Town Crt. Concord, Ontario L4K 1V3

A103/03

Kimberley Faria 17 Boyne Highlands Crt. Concord, Ontario L4K 1K4

A103/03

Joe Pignatelli 265 Brickstone Circle Thornhill, Ontario L4J 6L3

A103/03

Natalie Scono 192 Novaview Cres. Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 9L8

A103/03

Carolina Mariani 25 Capilano Crt. Concord, Ontario L4K 1L2

A103/03

Rony Petros 67 Summeridge Drive Thornhill, Ontario L4J 8T3

A103/03

Jason Carvaltro 127 Gayla St. Thornhill, Ontario L4J 6G9

A103/03

Cyrus Florendo 121 Wade Gate Thornhill, Ontario L4J 5X7

A103/03

David Proto 157 Brownridge Drive Thornhill, Ontario L4J 7B6

A103/03

Warren Patterson 218 Joseph Aaron Blvd. Thornhill, Ontario L4J 6C2

A103/03

Chris Ross 115 Cog Hill Drive Concord, Ontario L4K 1M6

A103/03

Occupant 27 Twin Pines Cres. Concord, Ontario L4K 3H7

A103/03

Diana Santapaga 54 Harmonia Cres. Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 3Y3

A103/03

Jennifer De Rocher 187 Mabley Cres. Thornhill, Ontario L4J 2Z7

A103/03

Mary Ann James 27 Lodgeway Drive Maple, Ontario L6A 3S6

A103/03


of 30

It should be noted that K. Connell abstained from voting on the adoption of the June 26, 2003 minutes, as she was not present at that meeting. CARRIED ADJOURNMENTS AND/OR DEFERRALS A fax, dated July 10, 2003 was received from George Leja, Toronto and Region Conservation, requesting that Item # 13, File No. B56/03 – TORONTO & REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY, BE ADJOURNED “SINE DIE”, pending rezoning of the parcel to be severed from OS1 - Open Space Conservation to R1- Residential Zone. A fax, dated July 10, 2003 was received from Wes Surdyka, Wes Surdyka Architect Inc., requesting that Item # 17, File No. A167/03 – GIOIA ARANDJELOVIC, BE WITHDRAWN, as the owner decided on alternate methods for the addition in order to comply to the zoning by-law. A fax, dated July 8, 2003 was received from Luciano Di Nardo, 8333 Weston Road, Suite 300, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 8E2, requesting that Item # 34, File No. A186/03 – LUCIANO DI NARDO & FABIOLA D’ARDOLFI, be heard first on the agenda, as the applicant had other commitments for later on that evening. MOVED by S. Perrella Seconded by T. DeCicco THAT Item # 13 File No. No. B56/03 – TORONTO & REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY, BE ADJOURNED “SINE DIE. THAT Item # 17, File No. File No. A167/03 – GIOIA ARANDJELOVIC, BE WITHDRAWN. THAT Item # 34, File No. File No. A186/03 – LUCIANO DI NARDO & FABIOLA D’ARDOLFI, be heard first on the agenda. CARRIED ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTIONS MOVED by S. Perrella Seconded by T. DeCicco THAT ITEM NO. 21, FILE NO. A160/03 - ANTONIETTA TIRINATO,Notice of Application , circulated JUNE 12, 2003 SHOULD READ: The applicant is requesting variances to permit the construction of a garage attached to an existing one storey single family detached dwelling, with an addition above the existing home and new garage, notwithstanding, the nature of the proposed variances, the proposed changes to the existing By-law & the current By-law requirements are as follows:

VARIANCES PROPOSED BY-LAW REQUIREMENT

Minimum garage setback to property line 5.8m 6.4m Minimum interior side yard setback 0.6m 1.2m Minimum front yard setback 2.2m 2.7m

NOT:

ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTIONS


of 30

The applicant is requesting variances to permit the construction of a garage attached to an existing one storey single family detached dwelling, with an addition above the existing home and new garage, notwithstanding, the nature of the proposed variances, the proposed changes to the existing By-law & the current By-law requirements are as follows:


Minimum garage setback to property line 5.8m 6.4m Minimum interior side yard setback 0.6m 1.2m Minimum front yard setback 2.2m 2.7m Minimum lot area 296.5m2 360m2 Minimum lot frontage 11.26m 12m CARRIED. MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING: 1. FILE NO: A186/03 LUCIANO DI NARDO & FABIOLA D’AROLFI

LOCATION Part of Lot 23, Concession 8, (Lot 3, Plan No. M-7553, municipally known as 63 Pennon Road, Kleinburg.) PROPOSAL

The subject lands are zoned R1, Residential, under By-law 1-88 as amended. The applicants are requesting a variance to permit the construction of a two storey single family detached dwelling, with attached garage, notwithstanding, the minimum front yard setback will be 20.56m., rather than the By-law requires minimum front yard setback of 24.56m.

Please note: The existing dwelling will be demolished

On July 4, 2003 the applicant submitted two letter of support from the following: N. O. Watson, 53 Pennon Rd., Box 228, Kleinburg, Ontario, L0J 1C0; Hans & Ingrid Pohler, 75 Pennon Rd., Kleinburg, Ontario, L0J 1C0. A fax dated July 8, 2003, was received from Toronto and Region Conservation Authority stating that they have no objections to the application as submitted, however, the applicant is advised that prior to obtaining a building permit for the proposed works, Authority staff should be consulted for approval pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 and the VSCMP policies. Luciano Di Nardo, appeared on his own behalf and gave a brief submission regarding the request. There was no one in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request. There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies. MOVED by T. DeCicco Seconded L. Fluxgold THAT THE Committee is of the opinion that the variance sought can be considered minor and is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land. The general intent and purpose of the By-law and the Official Plan will be maintained

MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING: Cont’d


of 30

1. FILE NO: A186/03 LUCIANO DI NARDO & FABIOLA D’AROLFI

AND THAT Application No, A186/03 – LUCIANO DI NARDO & FABIOLA D’AROLFI, be: APPROVED, in accordance with the sketch attached. CARRIED.

MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING: (PREVIOUSLY ADJOURNED FROM DECEMBER 5, 2000 MEETING) 2. FILE NO: A299/00 ORLANDO & EGIZIACA SAV0-SARDARO

LOCATION Part of Lot 17, Concession 4, (Lot 173, Registered Plan No. 65M-3062, municipally known as 71 Hawker Road, Maple.) PROPOSAL The subject lands are zoned R3, Residential, subject to Exception 9(893) under By-law 1-88 as amended. The applicants are requesting a variance to permit the maintenance of exterior stair and deck to an existing one storey single family detached dwelling with attached garage, notwithstanding, the minimum setback to open and unenclosed deck and stairs is 6.5m, rather than the By-law requires minimum setback to open and unenclosed deck and stairs of 7.2m. This application was previously adjourned from the December 5, 2000 meeting. Wellington Jno-Baptiste, from Viljoen Architect, appeared as the designated agent and gave a brief submission regarding the request. There was no one in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request. There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies. MOVED by T. DeCicco Seconded S. Perrella THAT THE Committee is of the opinion that the variance sought can be considered minor and is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land. The general intent and purpose of the By-law and the Official Plan will be maintained. AND THAT Application No, A299/00 – ORLANDO & EGIZIACA SAV0-SARDARO, be: APPROVED, in accordance with the sketch attached.

CARRIED.

3. FILE NO: A158/03 NICK & VITA LOCICERO

LOCATION Part of Lot 15, Concession 6, (Lot 28, Registered Plan No. 65M-3331, municipally known as 25 Muzich Place, Woodbridge.)

MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING:


of 30

3. FILE NO: A158/03 NICK & VITA LOCICERO

PROPOSAL The subject lands are zoned RR, subject to provisions of Exception Number 9(1141) under By-Law 1-88 as amended. The applicant is requesting a variance to permit the construction of a proposed two-storey single family detached dwelling with an attached garage, notwithstanding, the maximum lot coverage will be 20.10%, rather than the By-law requires the maximum lot coverage to be 15%. This application was previously adjourned from the June 26, 2003 meeting, in order for the applicant to consider reducing the lot coverage request. The Committee called the above file, however, the agent and/or applicant were not present. At this time the Committee agreed to STAND this item DOWN to allow time for the agent to appear. MOVED by T. DeCicco Seconded K. Connell THAT Item # 7, File No. A158/03 – NICK & VITA LOCICERO, be STOOD DOWN. CARRIED.

4. FILE NO: A163/03 THE BADDECK PROPERTIES GROUP INC.

LOCATION Part of Lot 5, Concession 7, (Part of Block “A”, Registered Plan M-1597, Lot 50, Part of Lot 53, Registrar’s Compiled Plan 9831, Municipally known as 26 Bruce Street, Woodbridge). PROPOSAL The subject lands are zoned R1 – Residential and R3 - Residential, under By-Law 1-88 as amended

The applicant is requesting a variance to permit the proposed one-storey extension to the existing two-storey building, notwithstanding, the interior side yard setback to the addition will be 2.906m, rather than the By-law requires for all institutional uses, the minimum side yard setback be 15.0m This application was previously adjourned from the June 26, 2003 meeting. A fax of support, dated June 24, 2003 was received from Mrs. Isabel Shore, 37 Bruce Street, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 1J3. A fax dated July 7, 2003 was received from Village Academy, 140 Woodbridge Ave., Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 4K9, listing support from the following residents: Connie Simone, 58 Bruce Street, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 1J4; Gerarda Morelli, 52 Bruce Street, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 1J4; Larry Berenz, 62 Bruce Street, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 1J4; Lidio Cattapan, 49 Bruce Street, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 1J3; Isabel Shore, 37 Bruce Street, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 1J3.

MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING: Cont’d


of 30

4. FILE NO: A163/03

THE BADDECK PROPERTIES GROUP INC. A fax of opposition, dated July 10, 2003 was received from Jerry Di Leo, 33 Bruce Street, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 1J3. He raised concerns regarding the interior side yard setback, questioned the entrance to the parking lot and if approval is granted his request is that no windows be allowed facing Bruce Street. On June 17, 2003 the Community Planning Department made the following written comments: At this time there are questions to be answered, therefore the Community Planning Department is not in the position to give support to this Variance Application. On July 10, 2003 the Community Planning Department sent a revised report by adding a condition that the applicant submits a Site Development Application. Bryce Taylor, appeared as the designated agent and gave a brief submission regarding the request. The Committee asked the agent if he had communicated with the immediate neighbours. He stated he made a great effort to meet with the neighbours by phone and dropping information at the door, however, nothing has been resolved. Renzo Belluz, Bianchi Presta Barristers & Siolicitors, 8400 Jane Street, Suite 300, Vaughan, Ontario, L4K 4L8, appeared representing Maria Cesta Incani, 40 Bruce Street, Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 1J4. Mr. Belluz gave a lengthy submission of objection, referring to the severe setback, and that there is sufficient room to put the addition to the side/rear. He also pointed out the existing building is non-conforming to the By-Law at present. The Committee questioned Building Standards staff as to why this application was not reported as legal non-conforming by their department as the situation has been there for 37 years and the existing building does not conform. Staff stated they would have to check this application as he did not comment on this file. Rather than delay the application Committee dealt with the application as submitted. It should be noted that the Building Standards Department (Zoning Section) did not identify this as being legal non-conforming during their review and the commenting process. At this time discussions took place to have this item stood down for further dialogue with neighbours. Valerie Markidis, appeared on behalf of her grandfather from 89 Pioneer Lane, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 2J2, having concerns regarding drainage. The Committee agreed to have this item STOOD DOWN, in order for the agent to discuss with the neighbour and Mr. Belluz representing 40 Bruce Street. The agent Bryce Taylor stated, standing the item down may not be fruitful since no resolution has been reached so far, however, he agreed to try again. MOVED by T. DeCicco Seconded S. Perrella THAT Item #8, File No. A163/03 – THE BADDECK PROPERTIES GROUP INC., be STOOD DOWN. CARRIED.


of 30

CONSENT PUBLIC HEARING 5. FILE NO: B54/03

COLEMAN FARMS LTD. LOCATION

Part of Lot 28, Concession 7, (Part 2 of Reference Plan No. 66R-6834, municipally known as 11100 Pine Valley Drive, Woodbridge). PROPOSAL The purpose of this application is to request the consent of the Committee of Adjustment to convey a parcel of land as an addition to an existing lot taken into the title of the lands to EAST, owned by Salvatore & Loredana Oliveti, together with all required easements and right of ways, if required, for residential purposes, and retain the lands for agricultural purposes. Both the subject land and retained land appear to have lot frontage. The subject and retained lands are zoned RR, Rural Residential under By-law 1-88 as amended. Prior to the hearing a signed authorization was received from Nicolas Marton, 4761 9th. Line, Beeton, Ontario, L0G 1A0, replacing agent Salvatore Oliveti. Mr. Marton gave a brief submission regarding the request. There was no one in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request.

There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies and any conditions requested are listed below. MOVED by T. DeCicco Seconded by K. Connell THAT Application No. B54/03– COLEMAN FARMS LTD., be APPROVED in accordance with the sketch attached and subject to the following conditions: NOTE: All conditions below must be fulfilled and clearance letters must be received by the Secretary-Treasurer before any cheques can be accepted and Certificate of Official can be issued. 1. Payment to the City of Vaughan of a Tree Fee if required, approved by Council as of

the date of granting the consent. Payment is to be made by certified cheque, to the satisfaction of the Reserves/Capital Department and Parks Department;

2. That the owner shall pay all taxes as levied, if required, to the satisfaction of the

Reserves/Capital Department; (contact Terri Liuni in the Reserves/Capital Department to have this condition cleared).

3. That the owner shall convey an 8.3 metres wide strip of land along the frontage of

Pine Valley Drive municipal road allowance to the City of Vaughan at no cost and free of charge and encumbrance to the City, if required, to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department;

4. That the owner shall arrange to prepare and register a reference plan at his/her

expense for the conveyance of the required road widening, if required, to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department;

5. That a by-law shall be passed dedicating the road widening as public highway to the

satisfaction of the Engineering Department and the Owner shall pay the cost of the registration of the road dedication by-law to the City of Vaughan, Clerks Department, if required, to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department;


of 30


COLEMAN FARMS LTD. 6. That the owner shall pay $30.00 per linear metre for Road improvement costs to the

satisfaction of the City of Vaughan, for the frontage on Pine Valley Road Municipal Road Allowance, if required, to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department;

7. This consent is given on the express understanding that Subsection 3 or Subsection

5 of Section 50 of the Planning Act shall apply to any subsequent conveyance in respect to the subject lands;

8. That the applicant provide to the Secretary Treasurer a letter of undertaking, stating

that the lands in question are (in favour of or taken into the title of the lands to the N.S.E. or W.).

9. Submission to the Secretary-Treasurer of three (3) white prints of a registered

deposited reference plan of survey, showing the subject land which conforms with the application submitted and which shows the dimensions and areas of each part shown on the plan;

10. Upon fulfilling and complying with all of the above-noted conditions, the Secretary-

Treasurer of the Committee of Adjustment must be provided with a letter and a “Schedule Page”, in a format satisfactory to the Secretary-Treasurer, from the Applicant’s solicitor confirming the legal description of the subject lands, sufficient for registration purposes the “Schedule Page” will be an attachment to the Certificate. Upon being satisfied with said legal description and upon all other conditions for the consent having been satisfied, the Secretary-Treasurer shall provide a Certificate of Official to the applicant in accordance with Section 53(42) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, as amended;

11. A fee of $200.00 made payable to the Treasurer City of Vaughan shall, be submitted

to the Secretary Treasurer for the issuance of the Certificate/stamping of the deeds. It will be necessary to allow up to three (3) working days after all conditions have been fulfilled and documentation filed. Same day service is also available for an additional cost of $100.00, provided all conditions of approval have been fulfilled and all required documents are submitted by 11:30 am that day;

12. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, if required, the applicant shall fulfil and comply with all of the above noted consent conditions;

IMPORTANT: Pursuant to Section 53(20) of the Planning Act, the applicant shall have a period of one year from the date of the Committee of Adjustment giving Notice of the herein Decision to the Applicant to fulfil and comply with all of the (above-noted) conditions of Consent. Failing to comply with this requirement will result in the application to be deemed to be refused.

ALL CONDITIONS MUST BE FULFILLED. Please contact each Agency and/or Department listed above whether "if required" appears in

the condition or not.

PLEASE NOTE: 1. That the payment of the Regional Development Charge is payable to the City of

Vaughan before issuance of a building permit in accordance with the Development Charges Act and the Regional Development Charges By-law in effect at the time of payment.

2. That the payment of the City Development Charge is payable to the City of Vaughan

before issuance of a building permit in accordance with the Development Charges Act and the City's Development Charges By-law in effect at the time of payment.


of 30


COLEMAN FARMS LTD. 3. That the payment of the Education Development Charge is payable to the City of

Vaughan before issuance of a building permit in accordance with the Development Charges Act and the Boards of Education By-laws in effect at the time of payment

4. That the payment of Special Area Development charge is payable to the City of

Vaughan before issuance of a building permit in accordance with the Development Charges Act and The City's Development Charge By-law in effect at the time of Building permit issuance, if required, to the satisfaction of the Reserves/Capital Department;

CARRIED

CONSENT& MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING:

6. FILE NOS: B55/03, A171/03, A195/03 to RIZMI HOLDINGS LTD 8.

LOCATION Lot 33, Concession 1, (Lot 29, Plan No. M1279, municipal known as 44 Uplands Avenue, Thornhill.) PROPOSAL

The purpose of this application is to request the consent of the Committee of Adjustment to convey a parcel of land for the purpose of creating a new lot, for residential purposes, together with all required easements and right-of-ways, if required, and retain the land for residential purposes. The applicant is requesting authorization of variances to facilitate the severance of the total lands (B55/03,) notwithstanding, the nature of the proposed variances, the proposed changes to the existing By-law and the current By-law requirements are as follows: A171/03 – Subject land – minimum lot frontage will be 22.53m, rather than the By-law requires minimum lot frontage of 30m. A195/03 – Retained land – minimum lot frontage will be 24.59m., rather than the By-law requires minimum lot frontage of 30m. The existing dwelling and shed on the subject and retained lands will be demolished.

The subject and retained lands are zoned R1V, Old Village Residential, and subject to the provisions of By-Law 1-88 as amended.

Glen Lucas, Lucas & Associates, Rizmi Holdings Ltd., the agent, appeared on behalf of the applicant and gave a brief submission regarding the requests. He presented the Committee with a list of residents, however, it was incomplete and was given back to him to provide full mailing addresses for notification purposes. He indicated to the Committee that this list is only for the purpose to show this Committee that he contacted the neighbours and further notices to them is not required, noting that this list of names will not be re-submitted to this office. He also presented the Committee with a letter dated June 30, 2003 giving background for other properties in the area and that this consent will be consistent with the overall character of the area.


of 30

CONSENT& MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING: Cont’d

6. FILE NOS: B55/03, A171/03, A195/03 to RIZMI HOLDINGS LTD 8.

The Committee questioned the agent regarding the comments from Planning with respect to the lot frontage onto public road. The Community Planning Department made the following written comments: The Community Planning Department has no objections to Consent Application B55/03 subject to the conformation that the lands conform to the policies of OPA No.94 in terms of frontage onto a public road. The Engineering Department made the following written comments; According to their files and drawings, there are no municipal sanitary sewers and watermains fronting the proposed severed property, and placed the following condition of approval. “The owner shall enter into an agreement with the City of Vaughan for the extension of municipal services (and Uplands Avenue if required) to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department.” There was no one in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request. There were no other objections from any Departments or Agencies. MOVED by L. Fluxgold Seconded by S. Perrella THAT Application No. B55/03– RIZMI HOLDINGS LIMITED, be REFUSED AND THAT THE Committee is of the opinion that the variances sought can not be considered minor and are not desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land. The general intent and purpose of the By-law and the Official Plan will not be maintained.

AND THAT Application Nos: A171/03 & A195/03– RIZMI HOLDINGS LIMITED, be REFUSED.

CARRIED. CONSENT & MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 9. FILE NOS: B57/03, A176/03

ROBERT & ELUNED MACMILLAN

LOCATION Part of Lot 17, Concession 2, (Parts 1 & 2, 65R-14366, municipally known as 9605 Dufferin Street, Maple). PROPOSAL B57/03 - The purpose of this application is to request the consent of the Committee of Adjustment to convey a parcel of land for the purpose of creating a new lot, for future residential purposes, together with all required easements and right-of-ways, if required, and retain the land for agricultural purposes.


of 30

CONSENT & MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING Cont’d 9. FILE NOS: B57/03, A176/03

ROBERT & ELUNED MACMILLAN A176/03 - The applicant is requesting a variance to permit the creation of a future development block. The parcel of land is land locked and will only be developed by way of a draft plan of subdivision, notwithstanding, the minimum lot frontage will be 0.0 metres (subject lands), and the minimum lot area will be 5.8 hectares, rather than the By-law states the minimum lot frontage of 100 metres is required (subject lands), and the minimum lot area of 10 hectares is required. The subject lands are currently being used for agricultural purposes. The retained lands have a residential dwelling and a barn. The subject and retained lands are zoned A, Agricultural and OS1, Open Space Conservation, and subject to the provisions of By-law 1-88 as amended. Other Planning Act Applications: Consent Application B11/92 – Approved February 6, 1992 ( Certificate issued Jan. 22/93 Minor Variance Application A12/92 – Approved February 6, 1992 (Rear yard setback and lot area) Randy Peddigrew, appeared as the designated agent on behalf of the applicant and gave a brief submission regarding the request. There was no one in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request. The Community Planning Department made the following written comments: The Community Planning Department has no objections to Consent Application B57/03 and Variance Application A176/03 on the condition that the Owner enter into an agreement to be registered on title, undertaking that no development will occur on the property pending rezoning and proper road access and servicing There were no other objections from any Departments or Agencies and any conditions requested are listed below.

MOVED by T. DeCicco Seconded by K. Connell

THAT Application No. B57/03– ROBERT & ELUNED MACMILLAN be APPROVED, in accordance with the sketch attached and subject to the following conditions: NOTE: All conditions below must be fulfilled and clearance letters must be received by the Secretary-Treasurer before any cheques can be accepted and Certificate of Official can be issued.

1. Payment to the City of Vaughan of a Tree Fee if required, approved by Council as of

the date of granting the consent. Payment is to be made by certified cheque, to the satisfaction of the Reserves/Capital Department and Parks Department;

2 That the owner shall pay all taxes as levied, if required, to the satisfaction of the

Reserves/Capital Department; (contact Terri Liuni in the Reserves/Capital Department to have this condition cleared).

3. The applicant shall provide the City of Vaughan with an appraisal report, if required

and valuation of the subject land (land only) to be prepared by an accredited appraiser, if required. Payment of a Parkland Levy to the City in lieu of deeding of land for park purposes shall be made if a new lot is being created. Said levy is to be 5% of the appraised market value of the subject land as of the date of the Committee of Adjustment giving notice to the Application of the herein decision. Said levy shall be approved by the Manager of Real Estate. Payment shall be made by certified cheque only;


of 30

CONSENT & MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING Cont’d. 9. FILE NOS: B57/03, A176/03


4. That the Owner enters into an agreement to be registered on title, undertaking that no development will occur on the property pending rezoning and proper road access and servicing, if required, to the satisfaction of the Community Planning Department;

5. Upon fulfilling and complying with all of the above-noted conditions, the Secretary-

Treasurer of the Committee of Adjustment must be provided with a letter and a “Schedule Page”, in a format satisfactory to the Secretary-Treasurer, from the Applicant’s solicitor confirming the legal description of the subject lands, sufficient for registration purposes the “Schedule Page” will be an attachment to the Certificate. Upon being satisfied with said legal description and upon all other conditions for the consent having been satisfied, the Secretary-Treasurer shall provide a Certificate of Official to the applicant in accordance with Section 53(42) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, as amended;

6. A fee of $200.00 made payable to the Treasurer City of Vaughan shall, be submitted

to the Secretary Treasurer for the issuance of the Certificate/stamping of the deeds. It will be necessary to allow up to three (3) working days after all conditions have been fulfilled and documentation filed. Same day service is also available for an additional cost of $100.00, provided all conditions of approval have been fulfilled and all required documents are submitted by 11:30 am that day;

7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, if required, the applicant shall fulfil and comply with all of the above noted consent conditions;

IMPORTANT: Pursuant to Section 53(20) of the Planning Act, the applicant shall have a period of one year from the date of the Committee of Adjustment giving Notice of the herein Decision to the Applicant to fulfil and comply with all of the (above-noted) conditions of Consent. Failing to comply with this requirement will result in the application to be deemed to be refused.

ALL CONDITIONS MUST BE FULFILLED. Please contact each Agency and/or Department listed above whether "if required" appears in

the condition or not.

PLEASE NOTE: 1. That the payment of the Regional Development Charge is payable to the City of

Vaughan before issuance of a building permit in accordance with the Development Charges Act and the Regional Development Charges By-law in effect at the time of payment.

2. That the payment of the City Development Charge is payable to the City of Vaughan

before issuance of a building permit in accordance with the Development Charges Act and the City's Development Charges By-law in effect at the time of payment.

3. That the payment of the Education Development Charge is payable to the City of

Vaughan before issuance of a building permit in accordance with the Development Charges Act and the Boards of Education By-laws in effect at the time of payment

4. That the payment of Special Area Development charge is payable to the City of

Vaughan before issuance of a building permit in accordance with the Development Charges Act and The City's Development Charge By-law in effect at the time of Building permit issuance, if required, to the satisfaction of the Reserves/Capital Department;

THAT the Committee is of the opinion that the variances sought can be considered minor and are desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land. The general intent and purpose of the By-law and the Official Plan will be maintained.


of 30

CONSENT & MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING Cont’d. 9. FILE NOS: B57/03, A176/03


AND THAT Application No. A176/03– ROBERT & ELUNED MAC MILLAN, be APPROVED, in accordance with the sketch attached, and any conditions are listed below;

1. That the Owner enters into an agreement to be registered on title, undertaking that

no development will occur on the property pending rezoning and proper road access and servicing, if required, to the satisfaction of the Community Planning Department;

2. That if the condition listed above is not fulfilled within twelve (12) months of the

date this decision becomes final and binding, the said decision shall expire and shall be deemed to have been annulled and rescinded by the Committee.

CARRIED.

MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING: 10. FILE NO: A166/03 1525326 ONTARIO LTD.

LOCATION Part of Lot 10, Concession 3, (Lot 30, Plan M1801, municipally known as 361 Connie Crescent, Concord). PROPOSAL The subject lands are zoned EM2, General Employment Area under By-law 1-88 as amended.

The applicant is requesting variances to permit the construction of a proposed two storey industrial building, notwithstanding, the landscape strip along a lot line of a provincial highway or an arterial road will be 6 metres, and there will be loading and unloading between a building and a street, rather than the By-law states the landscape strip along a lot line of a provincial highway or an arterial road shall be 9 metres, and loading and unloading shall not be permitted between a building and a street. Wes Surdyka, Wes Surdyka Architect, appeared as the designated agent on behalf of the applicant and gave a brief submission regarding the request. There was no one in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request. There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies. MOVED by K. Connell Seconded L. Fluxgold THAT the Committee is of the opinion that the variances sought can be considered minor and are desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land. The general intent and purpose of the By-law and the Official Plan will be maintained. AND THAT Application No, A166/03– 1525326 ONTARIO LTD., be APPROVED, in accordance with the sketch attached

CARRIED.


of 30

MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING: 11. FILE NO: A168/03 CRESENCIA S. SALE

LOCATION Part of Lot 21, Concession 4, (Part Block 13, Registered Plan No. 65M-3017, municipally known as 12 Kelso Crescent, Maple).

PROPOSAL The subject lands are zoned RM1, Multiple Residential, subject to Exception Number 9(840) under By-law 1-88 as amended.

The applicant is requesting a variance to permit the maintenance of a wider driveway, notwithstanding, the driveway width is 4.2 metres, rather than the By-law states the maximum driveway width permitted is 3.5 metres Glen Sale, appeared as the agent and gave a brief submission regarding the request. Correction to the spelling of the last name was pointed out correcting all future correspondence. There was no one in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request. There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies. MOVED by L. Fluxgold Seconded by T. DeCicco THAT the Committee is of the opinion that the variance sought can be considered minor and is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land. The general intent and purpose of the By-law and the Official Plan will be maintained.

AND THAT Application No. A168/03– CRESENCIA SALE, be APPROVED, in accordance with the sketch attached CARRIED.

At this time the Committee called Item # 7, File No. A158/03 – NICK & VITA LOCICERO, which was STOOD DOWN earlier, to allow sufficient time for the applicant/agent to appear.

SEE ITEM NO 3 ABOVE – PAGE 6 3. FILE NO: A158/03 NICK & VITA LOCICERO

Pietro Ferrari, appeared as the designated agent on behalf of the applicants and gave a brief submission regarding the request. He stated that he does not wish to reduce the lot coverage request, and made mention of many properties in the area that have coverage greater than what he is seeking. He presented the Committee with a petition of support from various residents, however, it was incomplete and was given back to him to provide full mailing addresses and forward to the office by the next day. The petition of support was submitted by fax July 11, 2003 having full mailing addresses from the following:


of 30

Guriqbal Sohl 93 Brownlee Avenue Woodbridge, Ontario L4H 9N6 (RE: 15 Muzich Pl)

A158/03

Nadia Kavianpour 2 Muzich Place, Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 9C5

A158/03

Nick Russo 10 Muzich Place, Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 9C5

A158/03

Rocco Tatangelo 16 Muzich Place, Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 9C5

A158/03

Grace Commisio 16 Muzich Place, Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 9C5

A158/03

Silvano Florindi 30 Muzich Place, Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 9C5

A158/03

Rinaldo De Michele 36 Muzich Place, Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 9C5

A158/03

Victor Riorillo 42 Muzich Place, Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 9C5

A158/03

Payman Sedighlan 48 Muzich Place, Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 9C5

A158/03

Mary Porretta 54 Muzich Place, Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 9C5

A158/03

Mario Bottoni 60 Muzich Place, Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 9C5

A158/03

Paola Farina 68 Muzich Place, Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 9C5

A158/03

Ron Basso 78 Muzich Place, Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 9C5

A158/03

Enza Menna 82 Muzich Place, Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 9C5

A158/03

John Zannella 86 Muzich Place, Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 9C5

A158/03

Rick Martellacci 63 Muzich Place, Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 9C5

A158/03

Gino Panarese 54 Meadowland Court, Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 2Z1

A158/03

Armando Demarco 55 Meadowland Court, Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 2Z1

A158/03

Guriqbal Sohl, 93 Brownlee Ave., Woodbridge, L4l 9N6, owner of the property next door being 15 Muzich Place, appeared in support as he also intends to submit a Minor Variance for lot coverage. MOVED by L. Fluxgold Seconded by K. Connell THAT the Committee is of the opinion that the variance sought can be considered minor and is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land. The general intent and purpose of the By-law and the Official Plan will be maintained.

AND THAT Application No, A158/03– NICK AND VITA LOCICERO, be APPROVED, in accordance with the sketch attached ..

CARRIED.


of 30

MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING; 12. FILE NO: A169/03 ANALDO IANNI & ANNUNZIATA VALENTINI

LOCATION Part of Lot 18, Concession 8, (Lot 205, Registered Plan No. 65M-3318, municipally known as 77 Marco Sgotto Avenue, Woodbridge). PROPOSAL The subject lands are zoned RV4 – Residential Urban Village Four, under By-law 1-88 as amended and further subject to Exception 9(988). PRIOR to the applicant’s submission, the applicant amended the Application and the Notice of Application as follows:

“…variance to permit the maintenance NOT construction …”

THEREFORE, the applicants are requesting a variance to permit the maintenance of a wooden deck at the rear of an existing one storey single family detached dwelling, notwithstanding, the rear yard setback will be 3.8 metres, rather than the By-law states the minimum rear yard setback to be 5.1 metres Photos and a letter of objection was received July 3, 2003, from Alex Hunter, 88 Marco Sgotto Ave., Lot 206. Some of the concerns raised are lack of privacy, and depreciation of his property. Mr. Ianni’s nephew represented the applicant at the hearing, stating that a mutual agreement with the neighbour has been reached. It was agreed that the owner will erect a lattice fence with respect to screening. Mr. Hunter took the podium and stated that he now has no objections to this application as an agreement has been reached. The Committee made it clear that this was an oral agreement between the two parties, and this will not be reflected in the decision. There was no one else in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request. There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies. MOVED by S. Perrella Seconded by K. Connell THAT THE Committee is of the opinion that the variances sought can be considered minor and are desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land. The general intent and purpose of the By-law and the Official Plan will be maintained. AND THAT Application No, A169/03– ANALDO IANNI & ANNUNZIATA VALENTINI, be APPROVED, AS AMENDED in accordance with the sketch attached .

CARRIED.


of 30

MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING; 13. FILE NO: A170/03 LIZ RAKOVALIS

LOCATION Part of Lot 17, Concession 4, (Part Lot 75 - townhome, Registered Plan No. 65M-3063, municipally known as 68 Parktree Drive, Maple.) PROPOSAL The subject lands are zoned RM2, Multiple Residential, subject to Exception Number 9(893) under By-law 1-88 as amended.

The applicant is requesting a variance to permit the maintenance of an excavated front porch, to and existing two storey townhome with attached garage, notwithstanding, the minimum front yard setback to excavated porch is 3.58m, rather than the By-law requires minimum front yard setback to excavated porch of 4.5m. Wellington Jno-Baptiste,Viljoen Architect, appeared as the designated agent on behalf of the applicant and gave a brief submission regarding the request. There was no one in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request. The Building Standards Department made the following written comments: Survey submitted to the City by the purchaser’s lawyer shows a setback measurement of 3.54m, and comments are based on a review of the documentation supplied with this application. There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies. MOVED by S. Perrella Seconded by K. Connell THAT the Committee is of the opinion that the variance sought can be considered minor and is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land. The general intent and purpose of the By-law and the Official Plan will be maintained. AND THAT Application No, A170/03 – LIZ RAKOVALIS, be: APPROVED, in accordance with the sketch attached. CARRIED.

14. FILE NO: A172/03 OTTAVIO & MARIA PISCIOTTA

LOCATION Part of Lots 23 & 24, Concession 4, (Lot 20, Registered Plan No. 65M-3225, municipally known as 52 Solway Avenue, Maple). PROPOSALS The subject lands are zoned R4, Residential, subject to Exception Number 9(960) under By-law 1-88 as amended.

The applicants are requesting variances to permit the maintenance of a widened driveway with curbs and walkway notwithstanding, the maximum width of the driveway is 6.3 metres, and the minimum landscape area is 24%, rather than the By-law states the maximum width of the driveway to be 6 metres, and 33% minimum landscaped front yard required of which a minimum 60% shall be soft landscaping.


of 30

MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING; 14. FILE NO: A172/03

OTTAVIO & MARIA PISCIOTTA Maria Pisciotta, the applicant appeared and gave a brief submission regarding the request. There was no one in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request. There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies. MOVED by S. Perrella Seconded by K. Connell THAT the Committee is of the opinion that the variances sought can be considered minor and are desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land. The general intent and purpose of the By-law and the Official Plan will be maintained. AND THAT Application No, A172/03– OTTAVIO & MARIA PISCIOTTA, be APPROVED in accordance with the sketch attached . CARRIED.

15. FILE NO: A173/03 VITULLO INVESTMENTS LTD

LOCATION Part of Lot 15, Concession 3, (Lot 22, Registered Plan No. 65M-2795, municipally known as 2077 Rutherford Rd., formerly 720 Westburne Drive, Maple.) PROPOSAL The subject lands are zoned C7, Service Commercial, under By-law 1-88 subject to Exception 9(1122). The applicant is requesting a variance to permit the maintenance of a two storey office building for a day nursery, notwithstanding, the minimum parking spaces will be 48, rather than the By-law requires minimum parking spaces of 61. A sketch is attached illustrating the request.

Other Planning act Applications The land which is the subject in this application is also the subject of an application under the Planning act for:

Minor Variance Application A343/01 APPROVED, December 6,2001 – file lapsed. Re-submitted application. Aldo Mirigello, appeared as the designated agent on behalf of the applicant and gave a brief submission regarding the request. There was no one in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request. There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies. MOVED by S. Perrella Seconded by K. Connell


of 30

MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING; 15. FILE NO: A173/03

VITULLO INVESTMENTS LTD THAT the Committee is of the opinion that the variance sought can be considered minor and is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land. The general intent and purpose of the By-law and the Official Plan will be maintained.

AND THAT Application No, A173/03 – VITULLO INVESTMENTS LTD, be: APPROVED, in accordance with the sketch attached. CARRIED.

16. FILE NO: A174/03 DARIO VETTORETTI

LOCATION Part of Lot 24, Concession 4, (Lot 37, Registered Plan No. 65M-3449, municipally known as 102 Fermar Drive, Maple.) PROPOSAL The subject lands are zoned R1, Residential, under By-law 1-88 as amended.

The subject lands are zoned RV2, Residential Urban Village Zone Two, under By-law 1-88, subject to Exception 9(1002).

The applicant is requesting a variance to permit the maintenance of a rear yard deck to an existing two storey single family detached dwelling, with attached garage, notwithstanding, the minimum rear yard setback to an open and unenclosed deck is 4.66m, rather than the By-law requires minimum rear yard setback to open and unenclosed deck of 5.7m. During the application process a list of support was submitted from the following residents: Shepherd & Hope Lewis, 34 Monteith Cres., Maple, Ontario, L6A 3M7; Nicole Foster, 22 Monteith Cres., Maple, Ontario, L6A 3M7; Emerson Jardine, 22 Monteith Cres., Maple, Ontario, L6A 3M7;Linda Ricci, 106 Fermar Drive, Maple, Ontario, L6A 3E1; John Masi, 98 Fermar Drive, Maple, Ontario, L6A 3M6; Aldo D’Alessandro, 94 Fermar Drive, Maple, Ontario, L6A 3M6; Michael Tonna, 110 Fermar Drive, Maple, Ontario, L6A 3E1; Sam Sinisi, 38 Monteith Cres., Maple, Ontario, L6A 3M7. Dario Vettoretti, the applicant appeared and gave a brief submission regarding the request. There was no one in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request. There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies


of 30

MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING; 16. FILE NO: A174/03 DARIO VETTORETTI

MOVED by K. Connell Seconded S. Perrella

THAT the Committee is of the opinion that the variance sought can be considered minor and is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land. The general intent and purpose of the By-law and the Official Plan will be maintained. AND THAT Application No, A174/03 – DARIO VETTORETTI,, be: APPROVED, in accordance with the sketch attached.

CARRIED. 17. FILE NO: A175/03 REMINGTON HOMES (WESTON) INC

LOCATION Part of Lot 18, Concession 6, (Lot 157, Registered Plan No. 65M-3549, municipally known as 211 Davos Road, Woodbridge). PROPOSAL The subject lands are zoned RV2(WS) Residential Urban Village Zone Two subject to the provisions of Exception Number 9(1024) under By-law 1-88 as amended.

The applicant is requesting a variance to permit the maintenance of a two storey single family detached dwelling, notwithstanding, the minimum setback to a day lighting triangle is 0.53 metres, rather than the By-law states the minimum setback to a day lighting triangle shall be 0.6 metres. A fax dated July 10, 2003 was received from Christopher Bratty, Vice President of Development, Remington Homes, appointing Randy Peddigrew to act as the agent for this application. Randy Peddigrew, appeared on behalf of the applicant and gave a brief submission regarding the request. There was no one in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request.

There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies. MOVED by S. Perrella Seconded by K. Connell THAT the Committee is of the opinion that the variance sought can be considered minor and are desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land. The general intent and purpose of the By-law and the Official Plan will be maintained.

THAT Application No. A175/03– REMINGTON HOMES (WESTON) INC., be APPROVED, in accordance with the sketch attached. CARRIED.

MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING:


of 30

18. FILE NOS.: A177/03 TO A184/03 to 25. LISA DURANTE (A177/03); R. NICOLINI (A178/03); GUERINO & JOYCE GAUCI

NACCARATO (A180/03); DIANNA MAMMOLITI (A181/03); MIKE BANCHERI (A182/03); SILVIO & AMANDA TALEVI (A183/03); MAURO PECA (A184/03); JOSEPH & FRANCESCA DI GIROLAMO (A179/03) LOCATION Part of Lot 15, Concession 6, (Lots 10, 8, 33, 43, 48, 51, 44, Registered Plan No. 65M-3052, municipally known as 65, 51 Babak Blvd., 94, 59, 29, 9, 53, 15 Kimber Cres., Woodbridge.) PROPOSAL The subject lands are zoned R1, Residential under By-law 1-88 as amended. The applicants are requesting variances to permit the maintenance of two storey and one storey (A183/03) single family detached dwellings, with attached garages, notwithstanding, the nature of the proposed variances, the proposed changes to the existing By-law & the current By-law requirements are as follows:


A177/03 maximum curb cut 7.5m 6.0m A178/03 maximum curb cut 7.8m 6.0m A180/03 maximum curb cut 7.4m 6.0m A181/03 maximum curb cut 7.2m 6.0m A182/03 maximum curb cut 7.4m 6.0m A183/03 maximum curb cut 6.7m 6.0m A184/03 maximum curb cut 8.5m 6.0m A179/03 maximum curb cut 6.8m 6.0m minimum landscape 30% 50% maximum driveway width 9.8m 9.0m Galen Lam, from Law Development, appeared on behalf of the applicants and gave a brief submission regarding the requests. There was no one in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request. The Community Planning Department made the following written comments: This department has not supported similar applications in the past. It is this department’s opinion that the cumulative effect of these applications could lead to reduced opportunities for on-street parking and reduced front yard landscaping The Engineering Department made the following written comments: Engineering Department staff has visited the site in response to the applications to permit the widened driveways. There are no existing boulevard items that would be adversely impacted by the widening, however, the widened driveways and curb cuts are not in conformity with By-Law 263-94.

There were no other objections from any Departments or Agencies. MOVED by L. Fluxgold Seconded by T. DeCicco THAT the Committee is of the opinion that the variances sought can be considered minor and are desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land. The general intent and purpose of the By-law and the Official Plan will be maintained.


of 30

MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING: 18. FILE NOS.: A177/03 TO A184/03 to 25. LISA DURANTE (A177/03); R. NICOLINI (A178/03); GUERINO & JOYCE GAUCI

NACCARATO (A180/03); DIANNA MAMMOLITI (A181/03); MIKE BANCHERI (A182/03); SILVIO & AMANDA TALEVI (A183/03); MAURO PECA (A184/03); JOSEPH & FRANCESCA DI GIROLAMO (A179/03)

AND THAT Application Nos, A177/03 to A184/03 – LISA DURANTE (A177/03); R. NICOLINI (A178/03); GUERINO & JOYCE GAUCI NACCARATO (A180/03); DIANNA MAMMOLITI (A181/03); MIKE BANCHERI (A182/03); SILVIO & AMANDA TALEVI (A183/03); MAURO PECA (A184/03); JOSEPH & FRANCESCA DI GIROLAMO (A179/03),, be: APPROVED, in accordance with the sketch attached. CARRIED.

26. FILE NO: A185/03 HILTON & RENE READING

LOCATION Part of Lots 7 & 8, Concession 2, (Block 209, Registered Plan No. 65M-2884, Block 110, Registered Plan No. 65M-2722, municipally known as 317 Worth Blvd., Thornhill). PROPOSAL The subject lands are zoned R2, Residential and subject to the provisions of Exception Number 9(773) under By-law 1-88 as amended.

The applicants are requesting a variance to permit the maintenance of pool equipment in the side yard of an existing two storey single family detached dwelling, notwithstanding, the minimum interior side yard setback is 0.3 metres to the pool equipment, rather than the By-law states the minimum interior side yard setback shall be 1.2 metres to the pool equipment Hilton Reading, appeared on his own behalf and gave a brief submission regarding the request. There was no one in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request.

There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies. MOVED by L. Fluxgold Seconded by K. Connell THAT the Committee is of the opinion that the variance sought can be considered minor and are desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land. The general intent and purpose of the By-law and the Official Plan will be maintained.

AND THAT Application No. A185/03– HILTON & RENE READING, be APPROVED, in accordance with the sketch attached. CARRIED.


of 30

MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 27. FILE NO: A187/03 NORTHWEST JANE RUTHERFORD REALTY LTD

LOCATION Part of Lots 16 & 17, Concession 5, (Block 21, Registered Plan No. 65M-3645, municipally known as 79 Sweetriver Blvd., Maple). PROPOSAL The subject lands are zoned RV4, Residential subject to the provisions of Exception Number 9 (946) under By-law 1-88 as amended.

The applicant is requesting a variance to permit the construction of a two storey, semi-detached dwelling, notwithstanding, the minimum rear yard setback proposed is 7.0 metres, rather than the By-law states the minimum rear yard setback of 7.5 metres is permitted. Nelson Cunha, RN Design Ltd., appeared on behalf of the applicant and gave a brief submission regarding the request. There was no one in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request.

There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies. MOVED by K. Connell Seconded by L. Fluxgold THAT the Committee is of the opinion that the variance sought can be considered minor and are desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land. The general intent and purpose of the By-law and the Official Plan will be maintained.

AND THAT Application No. A187/03– NORTHWEST JANE RUTHERFORD REALTY LTD,, be APPROVED, in accordance with the sketch attached. CARRIED.

28. FILE NO: A188/03 THORNHILL WOODS HOMES INC. (BATH-VON LIMITED

LOCATION Part of Lot 13, Concession 2, (Lot 81, Registered Plan No. 65M-3618, municipally known as 30 Ravel Drive, Thornhill.) PROPOSAL The subject lands are zoned RV4, Residential Urban Village Zone Four and subject to the provisions of Exception Number 9(1063) under By-law 1-88 as amended.

The applicant is requesting a variance to permit the maintenance of a two storey single family detached dwelling, with attached garage, notwithstanding, the minimum interior side yard setback is 1.11m. to the dwelling, rather than the By-law requires minimum interior side yard setback to the dwelling of 1.2m A fax dated July 10, 2003 was received from Christopher Bratty, Vice President of Development, Remington Homes, appointing Randy Peddigrew to act as the agent for this application. Randy Peddigrew, appeared on behalf of the applicant and gave a brief submission regarding the request.


of 30

MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING: 28. FILE NO: A188/03 THORNHILL WOODS HOMES INC. (BATH-VON LIMITED

There was no one in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request.

There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies. MOVED by K. Connell Seconded by S. Perrella THAT the Committee is of the opinion that the variance sought can be considered minor and is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land. The general intent and purpose of the By-law and the Official Plan will be maintained.

AND THAT Application No, A188/03 – THORNHILL WOODS HOMES INC, be: APPROVED, in accordance with the sketch attached. CARRIED.

29. FILE NO: A189/03 JACQUELINE ISHAIK

LOCATION Part of Lot 27, Concession 1, (Lot 42, Plan No. M-1947, municipally known as 210 York Hill Blvd.,Thornhill.) PROPOSAL The subject lands are zoned R4, Residential and subject to the provisions of Exception 9(468) under By-Law 1-88 as amended.

The applicant is requesting a variance to permit the construction of a one storey kitchen addition to an existing two storey single family detached dwelling, with attached garage, notwithstanding, the minimum rear yard setback will be 5.37m to the proposed addition, rather than the By-law requires minimum rear yard setback to the addition of 7.5m. Other Planning act Applications The land which is the subject in this application is also the subject of an application under the Planning act for: Minor Variance Application A151/80 APPROVED, Sept. 10, 1980, for the

construction of the existing home. Lilah Ishaik, appeared as the designated agent on behalf of the applicant and gave a brief submission regarding the request. There was no one in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request.

There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies. MOVED by S. Perrella Seconded by K. Connell THAT the Committee is of the opinion that the variance sought can be considered minor and is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land. The general intent and purpose of the By-law and the Official Plan will be maintained.

AND THAT Application No, A189/03– JACQUELINE ISHAIK be APPROVED in accordance with the sketch attached CARRIED.


of 30

MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING;

30. FILE NO: A190/03 ANTONIO SIMIELE & ANNA BIANCO

LOCATION Part of Lot 19, Concession 4, (Lot 196, Plan 5590, municipally known as 12 Gosling Road, Maple). PROPOSAL The subject lands are zoned R1V, Old Village Residential, under By-law 1-88 as amended. The applicants are requesting a variance to permit the construction of an addition including a new garage, to an existing one storey single family detached dwelling, notwithstanding, the maximum lot coverage will be 25.86%, rather than the By-law states the maximum lot coverage to be 20%. Please note: The existing garage will be demolished A letter of objection, dated, July 2, 2003 was submitted by Jean Geddes, 30 Gosling Rd., Maple, Ontario, L6A 1S3, stating that lot coverages in this area have been around the 23% Similar objections were submitted, dated July 7, 2003, by Joan Saunders, 28 Gosling Road, Maple, Ontario, L6A 1E2, and Carol Flynn, 11 Clemson Cres., Maple, Ontario, L6A 1C8, , opposing the requested lot coverage of 25.86%. Also a letter of objection was received July 8, 2003 from Gerry Steyn, 18 Lancer Drive, Maple, Ontario, L6A 1E4. Jacek Gorka, appeared as the designated agent on behalf of the applicant and gave a brief submission regarding the request. By way of the use of an easel, he displayed an enlarged photo of the house and pointed out the positive features this addition will have on the surrounding neighbourhood. The Committee indicated to the agent that past lot coverage approvals in the Old Maple Village supported by this Committee have been 23%. The Committee suggested this file be adjourned in order for the applicant/agent to enter into discussion with the concerned residents and amend his application to the suggested lot coverage. Many residents from R1V Old Village Residential Zone were present at the hearing.

There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies. MOVED by S. Perrella Seconded by K. Connell THAT Item # 38, File No. A190/03 – ANTONIO SIMIELE & ANNA BIANCO, BE ADJOURNED to the July 24, 2003 meeting. CARRIED.

31. FILE NO: A193/03 MARIO GESA

LOCATION Part of Lot 10, Concession 6, (Lot 157, Registered Plan No. 65M-2354, municipally known as 61 Carmen Cres., Woodbridge.)


of 30

MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING: Cont’d.


PROPOSAL The subject lands are zoned R3, Residential subject to the provisions of Exception 9(476) under By-Law 1-88 as amended.

The applicant is requesting variances to permit the maintenance of a rear yard storage shed and central air conditioner in the side yard, to an existing two storey single family detached dwelling, with attached garage, notwithstanding, the shed maximum height is 3.0m, maximum size is 10.78m2, the setback to the eave is 0.0m and the minimum side yard setback to the air conditioner is 0.5m, rather than the By-law requires maximum height of 2.5m, maximum size of 8m2, setback to eave of 0.3m and minimum setback to the air conditioner of 1.2m During the application process, letter of support were submitted from the following residents; Michele Iaboni, 169 Beatrice Way, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 5T1; T. Commisso, 171 Beatrice Way, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 5T1; Samuel Kitakufe, 175 Beatrice Way, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 5T1; Anthony Campea, 69 Carmen Cres., Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 5P6; Laconte Nicola, 181 Beatrice Way, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 5T1; M. Polsinelli,, 73 Carmen Cres., Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 5P6; Nicola Buompastore, 57 Carmen Cres., Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 5P9; A. Ippolito, 53 Carmen Cres., Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 5P9. Venanzio Gesa, son of the applicant appeared as the designated agent and gave a brief submission regarding the request. He presented the Committee with photos of the shed and air conditioner and a list of properties on Carmen Cres., Beatrice Way, Belview Ave., Firefly Cres., Adrianno Cres., Lime Drive, Leyton Rd., Fiori Drive, and Lucky Court, that have air conditioners in the side yards. As discussions continued, the Committee suggested they would consider this application provided the eave around the shed is removed. Tommaso Conte along with his wife, from 65 Carmen Cres., Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 5P5, appeared in opposition, stating that the shed is on the property line and agreed to support the application if the aluminium eave is removed, however, their other concern is the air conditioner being in the side yard which posed a medical problem for his wife. The wife also stated that she had a doctor’s note indicating noise concerns from the air conditioner. The applicant’s agent was called back to the podium and responded to the Conte concerns. He stated the air conditioner was moved to the side, as they built a concrete patio in the rear. The Committee and the applicant/agent agreed to remove the eave and to be 0.3m away from the property line and the structure other than the eave to be 0.6m away from the property line. It was agreed that the air conditioner will remain in the side yard. There was no one else in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request. The Community Planning Department made the following written comments; The Community Planning Department has no objections to Variance Application A193/03 with the exception of the request for 0.0m setback to the eave. This department does not support 0m setbacks. This department questions how the eaves will be maintained on the applicant’s property.

There were no other objections from any Departments or Agencies and any conditions requested are listed below.


of 30

MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING: Cont’d.


The Committee approved this application with added conditions. MOVED by T. DeCicco Seconded by K. Connell THAT the Committee is of the opinion that the variances sought can be considered minor and are desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land. The general intent and purpose of the By-law and the Official Plan will be maintained. AND THAT Application No, A193/03– MARIO GESA, be APPROVED in accordance with the sketch attached and subject to the following added conditions. 1. Any eaves must be 0.3m away from the property line. 2. Any structure, other than the eaves must be 0.6m away from the property line. 3. That if the condition(s) listed above is/are not fulfilled and the Building Permit is not

applied for within twelve (12) months of the date this decision becomes final and binding, the said decision shall expire and shall be deemed to have been annulled and rescinded by the Committee.

THIS MINOR VARIANCE DECISION IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT AUTHORIZING CONSTRUCTION UNDER THE BUILDING CODE ACT, R.S.O. 1990, AS AMENDED. A BUILDING PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT THE BUILDING STANDARDS DEPARTMENT IN THE EVENT THAT YOU REQUIRE FURTHER CLARIFICATION. CARRIED.

At this time the Committee called Item # 8, File No. A163/03, which was STOOD DOWN earlier for discussion with neighbour. SEE ITEM NO. 4 ABOVE – PAGE 7 4. FILE NO: A163/03 THE BADDECK PROPERTIES GROUP INC.

Bryce Taylor took the podium and stated they could not reach a mutual agreement, and requested that this file not be further adjourned as the applicant is anxious to start the construction. Mr. Belluz stated that his client is still in opposition to the application as presented. The Committee agreed to place conditions to address the concerns regarding screening and grading. MOVED by L. Fluxgold Seconded by T. DeCicco THAT the Committee is of the opinion that the variance sought can be considered minor and is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land. The general intent and purpose of the By-law and the Official Plan will be maintained. AND THAT Application No, A163/03– THE BADDECK PROPERTIES GROUP INC., be, APPROVED, in accordance with the sketch attached and subject to the following added conditions.


of 30

MINOR VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING: SEE ITEM NO. 4 ABOVE – PAGE 7 4. FILE NO: A163/03

THE BADDECK PROPERTIES GROUP INC. 1. Buffering to the satisfaction of the Urban Design Department; 2. Grading to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department; 3. That if the condition(s) listed above is/are not fulfilled and the Building Permit is not

applied for within twelve (12) months of the date this decision becomes final and binding, the said decision shall expire and shall be deemed to have been annulled and rescinded by the Committee.

THIS MINOR VARIANCE DECISION IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT AUTHORIZING CONSTRUCTION UNDER THE BUILDING CODE ACT, R.S.O. 1990, AS AMENDED. A BUILDING PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT THE BUILDING STANDARDS DEPARTMENT IN THE EVENT THAT YOU REQUIRE FURTHER CLARIFICATION. CARRIED. OTHER BUSINESS NONE MOTION TO ADJOURN

MOVED by T. DeCicco Seconded by L. Fluxgold

THAT the meeting of Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 7:30 p.m., and the next regular meeting will be held on JULY 24, 2003. CARRIED.

THURSDAY, JULY 10, 2003 - Vaughan · PROPOSAL. The subject lands are zoned R1, Residential, under...

Documents

Transcript of THURSDAY, JULY 10, 2003 - Vaughan · PROPOSAL. The subject lands are zoned R1, Residential, under...