THIS SIDEBAR DOES NOT PRINT—) Social Ability, Physical Health,...

1
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012 www.PosterPresentations.com ABSTRACT Research Design Cross-sectional data from Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (HOS) collected by self-administered mail survey or phone interview. Baseline data from wave one of the HOS thirty-four wave longitudinal study. Took place between 1998 and 2000, baseline survey conducted in 1998 (Cohort I baseline) and follow-up survey in 2000 (Cohort I remeasurement). METHODOLOGY Chi-Square Analysis Levels of social ability differ significantly between community-dwelling older adults and institutionalized older adults (X 2 (4) = 429.07, p < 0.01). Cramer’s V statistic suggested a strong relationship between variables (0.53). Community-dwelling older adults were less likely to have their physical or emotional health problems interfere with their social ability across all variables when compared to institutionalized older adults. RESULTS: SOCIAL ABILITY DISCUSSION Sample Randomly selected from Medicare and Choice Organizations (M+Cos). Original sample was n=177,760, after excluding respondents under 65 and excluding respondents that did not provide enough information to ascertain living arrangement, the sample for the current study resulted in n=159,991. REFERENCES Courtin, E., & Knapp, M. (2017). Social isolation, loneliness and health in old age: A scoping review. Health & Social Care in the Community, 25(3), 799-812. Dezutter, J., Toussaint, L., & Leijssen, M. (2016). Forgiveness, ego-integrity, and depressive symptoms in community- dwelling and residential elderly adults. Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 71(5), 786–797. Lehning, A. J. (2011). City governments and aging in place: Community design, transportation and housing innovation adoption. The Gerontologist, 52(3), 345-356. Lu, W., Pikhart, H., & Sacker, A. (2019). Domains and measurements of healthy aging in epidemiological studies: A review. Gerontologist, 59(4), 294–310. Scharlach, A. (2012). Creating aging-friendly communities in the United States. Ageing International, 37(1), 25-38. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many thanks to Dr. Ji and Dr. Lizano for their continued support and encouragement. Thank you to my family, friends, and fellow cohort members for their unconditional love and support. INTRODUCATION Alanis Cook, MSW Department of Social Work Social Ability, Physical Health, and Psychological Health Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults Capstone Research Advisors: Dr. Juye Ji & Dr. Erica Lizano LITERATURE REVIEW Commonly, older adults are being forced to leave their home and community to go into institutional care (Lehning, 2011; Scharlach, 2012). The present study aimed to examine the effects that living in the community had on older adult’s social ability, psychological health, and physical health. The study was a secondary analysis of the cross-sectional data drawn drawn from the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (HOS). The current study used baseline data from wave one (Cohort I) of the HOS thirty-four wave longitudinal study. Data collection utilized a standardized questionnaire that was administered through a self-administered mail survey or as a telephone survey. Results indicated that community-dwelling older adults were less likely to have physical or emotional health problems interfere with social ability, have higher levels of psychological health, and have higher levels of physical health including physical functioning and self-rated view of health, when compared to institutionalized older adults. The findings of the current study shed light on the need to increase prevention methods to enable older adults to live in the community to promote more positive social, physical, and psychological health. Research identifies that community living is the preference for older adults (Lehning, 2011; Lu, Pikhart, & Sacker, 2019; Scharlach, 2012). Research suggests that social isolation, loneliness, and involvement in social activities or social-emotional support groups impacts older adult’s physical and mental health (Courtin & Knapp, 2017; Lu et al., 2019). Research exploring psychological health indicates that community-dwelling older adults have high levels of despair and low levels of forgiveness compared to institutionalized older adults (Dezutter, Toussaint, & Leijssen, 2016). There is a gap in the current research of comparing community- dwelling older adults to institutionalized older adults when analyzing the quality of life of older adults. Significance of the Study By 2060, one in four U.S. residents will be older adults from the influx of baby boomers. Purpose of the Research The purpose of this study is to assess the effects that living in the community has on older adults. Research Question What is the effect of living in the community on older adult’s social ability, physical health, and psychological health? Hypothesis Researchers hypothesized that community-dwelling older adults would have higher levels of social ability, physical health, and psychological health, compared to institutionalized older adults. RESULTS: PHYSICAL HEALTH Measures v Independent Variable: Living Arrangement: One self-report conditional question that was combined in the current study to determine if the individual is community- dwelling or institutionalized (Y/N) v Dependent Variable: Social Ability: One self-report question assessing if physical or psychological health interfered with social ability (5-point Likert) Physical Health: Measured in two separate categories. Four self-report questions assessing the self-rated view of health and six self-report questions assessing physical functioning (5-point Likert) Psychological Health: Nine self-report questions assessing emotional state (6-point Likert) RESULTS: PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH 57.7% female, 42.3% male 57.4% 65 to 74, 42.6% greater than 74 88.7% White, 6.6% African American, 4.7% Other 6.4 10.6 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Community-Dwelling Ins/tu/onalized Most of the ?me Emotional and Physical Health Problems Interfering Social Ability 3 7.4 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Community-Dwelling Ins/tu/onalized All of the ?me Emotional and Physical Health Problems Interfering Social Ability 16.4 20.5 0 5 10 15 20 25 Community-Dwelling Ins/tu/onalized Some of the ?me Emotional and Physical Health Problems Interfering Social Ability 16.6 18.6 15.5 16 16.5 17 17.5 18 18.5 19 Community-Dwelling Ins/tu/onalized A li@le of the ?me Emotional and Physical Health Problems Interfering Social Ability 57.6 42.9 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Community-Dwelling Ins/tu/onalized None of the ?me Emotional and Physical Health Problems Interfering Social Ability T-Test Analysis Significant difference was found for level of physical functioning (t(3,115.32) = -20.76, p < . 001). Mean level of physical functioning of community-dwelling older adults (M = 16.99, SD = 1.84) was significantly better than institutionalized older adults (M = 15.85, SD = 3.01). Significant difference was found for self-rated view of health (t(3,068.74) = -13.23, p < .001). Mean self-rated view of health for community-dwelling older adults (M = 14.51, SD = 3.57) was significantly more positive than institutionalized older adults (M = 13.59, SD = 3.73). 16.99 14.51 15.85 13.59 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Physical Health: Physical Func/oning Physical Health: Self-Rated Mean Physical Health Community-Dwelling Ins/tu/onalized T-Test Analysis A significant difference was found for psychological health (t(2,938.03) = -14.46, p < .001). Mean psychological health of community-dwelling older adults (M = 39.76, SD = 8.06) was significantly higher than institutionalized older adults (M = 37.34, SD = 8.87). 39.76 37.34 36 36.5 37 37.5 38 38.5 39 39.5 40 Community-Dwelling Ins/tu/onalized Mean Psychological Health Summary of Findings Overall, the results support the hypothesis that community- dwelling older adults have higher levels of social ability, psychological health, and physical health, compared to institutionalized older adults. Implications for Research and Practice The study provided insight on the need to change the current method of thinking from intervention-based to prevention-based in order to create aging-friendly communities that promote positive social, psychological, and physical health. Strengths and Limitations Large sample size that is representative of all older adults. Majority of study participants were community-dwelling. The study provides foundational support on the effects of living arrangement by analyzing both community-dwelling older adults and institutionalized older adults. Variables n % Independent Variable Living Arrangement Community-dwelling 156,801 98.0 Institutionalized 3,190 2.0 Dependent Variables Social Ability All of the time 6,143 3.6 Most of the time 13,297 7.7 Some of the time 30,198 17.5 A little of the time 28,305 16.4 None of the time 94,242 54.7 Psychological Health M = 39.12 SD = 8.46 Physical Health: Self-rated M = 14.21 SD = 3.74 Physical Health: Physical functioning M = 16.85 SD = 1.98

Transcript of THIS SIDEBAR DOES NOT PRINT—) Social Ability, Physical Health,...

Page 1: THIS SIDEBAR DOES NOT PRINT—) Social Ability, Physical Health, …hhd.fullerton.edu/msw/_documents/research/student-posters... · 2020. 5. 13. · This PowerPoint 2007 template

RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012

www.PosterPresentations.com

(—THIS SIDEBAR DOES NOT PRINT—) DES I G N G U I DE

This PowerPoint 2007 template produces a 36”x48” trifold presentation poster. You can use it to create your research poster and save valuable time placing titles, subtitles, text, and graphics. We provide a series of online tutorials that will guide you through the poster design process and answer your poster production questions. To view our template tutorials, go online to PosterPresentations.com and click on HELP DESK. When you are ready to print your poster, go online to PosterPresentations.com Need assistance? Call us at 1.510.649.3001

QU ICK START

Zoom in and out As you work on your poster zoom in and out to the level that is more comfortable to you.

Go to VIEW > ZOOM.

Title, Authors, and Affiliations Start designing your poster by adding the title, the names of the authors, and the affiliated institutions. You can type or paste text into the provided boxes. The template will automatically adjust the size of your text to fit the title box. You can manually override this feature and change the size of your text. TIP: The font size of your title should be bigger than your name(s) and institution name(s).

Adding Logos / Seals Most often, logos are added on each side of the title. You can insert a logo by dragging and dropping it from your desktop, copy and paste or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Logos taken from web sites are likely to be low quality when printed. Zoom it at 100% to see what the logo will look like on the final poster and make any necessary adjustments. TIP: See if your school’s logo is available on our free poster templates page.

Photographs / Graphics You can add images by dragging and dropping from your desktop, copy and paste, or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Resize images proportionally by holding down the SHIFT key and dragging one of the corner handles. For a professional-looking poster, do not distort your images by enlarging them disproportionally.

Image Quality Check Zoom in and look at your images at 100% magnification. If they look good they will print well.

ORIGINAL DISTORTED

Cornerhandles

Good

prin

/ngqu

ality

Badprin/n

gqu

ality

QU ICK START ( con t . )

How to change the template color theme You can easily change the color theme of your poster by going to the DESIGN menu, click on COLORS, and choose the color theme of your choice. You can also create your own color theme. You can also manually change the color of your background by going to VIEW > SLIDE MASTER. After you finish working on the master be sure to go to VIEW > NORMAL to continue working on your poster.

How to add Text The template comes with a number of pre-formatted placeholders for headers and text blocks. You can add more blocks by copying and pasting the existing ones or by adding a text box from the HOME menu.

Text size

Adjust the size of your text based on how much content you have to present. The default template text offers a good starting point. Follow the conference requirements.

How to add Tables To add a table from scratch go to the INSERT menu and click on TABLE. A drop-down box will help you select rows and columns.

You can also copy and a paste a table from Word or another PowerPoint document. A pasted table may need to be re-formatted by RIGHT-CLICK > FORMAT SHAPE, TEXT BOX, Margins.

Graphs / Charts You can simply copy and paste charts and graphs from Excel or Word. Some reformatting may be required depending on how the original document has been created.

How to change the column configuration RIGHT-CLICK on the poster background and select LAYOUT to see the column options available for this template. The poster columns can also be customized on the Master. VIEW > MASTER.

How to remove the info bars

If you are working in PowerPoint for Windows and have finished your poster, save as PDF and the bars will not be included. You can also delete them by going to VIEW > MASTER. On the Mac adjust the Page-Setup to match the Page-Setup in PowerPoint before you create a PDF. You can also delete them from the Slide Master.

Save your work Save your template as a PowerPoint document. For printing, save as PowerPoint of “Print-quality” PDF.

Print your poster When you are ready to have your poster printed go online to PosterPresentations.com and click on the “Order Your Poster” button. Choose the poster type the best suits your needs and submit your order. If you submit a PowerPoint document you will be receiving a PDF proof for your approval prior to printing. If your order is placed and paid for before noon, Pacific, Monday through Friday, your order will ship out that same day. Next day, Second day, Third day, and Free Ground services are offered. Go to PosterPresentations.com for more information.

Student discounts are available on our Facebook page. Go to PosterPresentations.com and click on the FB icon.

©2013PosterPresenta/ons.com2117FourthStreet,[email protected]

ABSTRACT Research Design •  Cross-sectional data from Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (HOS) collected by self-administered mail survey or phone interview. •  Baseline data from wave one of the HOS thirty-four wave longitudinal study. Took place between 1998 and 2000, baseline survey

conducted in 1998 (Cohort I baseline) and follow-up survey in 2000 (Cohort I remeasurement).

METHODOLOGY

Chi-Square Analysis •  Levels of social ability differ significantly between community-dwelling older adults and institutionalized older adults (X2(4) = 429.07,

p < 0.01). Cramer’s V statistic suggested a strong relationship between variables (0.53). •  Community-dwelling older adults were less likely to have their physical or emotional health problems interfere with their social ability

across all variables when compared to institutionalized older adults.

RESULTS: SOCIAL ABILITY

DISCUSSION

Sample •  Randomly selected from Medicare and Choice Organizations (M+Cos). •  Original sample was n=177,760, after excluding respondents under 65 and

excluding respondents that did not provide enough information to ascertain living arrangement, the sample for the current study resulted in n=159,991.

REFERENCES •  Courtin, E., & Knapp, M. (2017). Social isolation, loneliness

and health in old age: A scoping review. Health & Social Care in the Community, 25(3), 799-812.

•  Dezutter, J., Toussaint, L., & Leijssen, M. (2016). Forgiveness, ego-integrity, and depressive symptoms in community-dwelling and residential elderly adults. Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 71(5), 786–797.

•  Lehning, A. J. (2011). City governments and aging in place: Community design, transportation and housing innovation adoption. The Gerontologist, 52(3), 345-356.

•  Lu, W., Pikhart, H., & Sacker, A. (2019). Domains and measurements of healthy aging in epidemiological studies: A review. Gerontologist, 59(4), 294–310.

•  Scharlach, A. (2012). Creating aging-friendly communities in the United States. Ageing International, 37(1), 25-38.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many thanks to Dr. Ji and Dr. Lizano for their continued support and encouragement. Thank you to my family, friends, and fellow

cohort members for their unconditional love and support.

INTRODUCATION

Alanis Cook, MSW Department of Social Work

Social Ability, Physical Health, and Psychological Health Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Capstone Research Advisors: Dr. Juye Ji & Dr. Erica Lizano

LITERATURE REVIEW

Commonly, older adults are being forced to leave their home and community to go into institutional care (Lehning, 2011; Scharlach, 2012). The present study aimed to examine the effects that living in the community had on older adult’s social ability, psychological health, and physical health. The study was a secondary analysis of the cross-sectional data drawn drawn from the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (HOS). The current study used baseline data from wave one (Cohort I) of the HOS thirty-four wave longitudinal study. Data collection utilized a standardized questionnaire that was administered through a self-administered mail survey or as a telephone survey. Results indicated that community-dwelling older adults were less likely to have physical or emotional health problems interfere with social ability, have higher levels of psychological health, and have higher levels of physical health including physical functioning and self-rated view of health, when compared to institutionalized older adults. The findings of the current study shed light on the need to increase prevention methods to enable older adults to live in the community to promote more positive social, physical, and psychological health.

•  Research identifies that community living is the preference for older adults (Lehning, 2011; Lu, Pikhart, & Sacker, 2019; Scharlach, 2012).

•  Research suggests that social isolation, loneliness, and involvement in social activities or social-emotional support groups impacts older adult’s physical and mental health (Courtin & Knapp, 2017; Lu et al., 2019).

•  Research exploring psychological health indicates that community-dwelling older adults have high levels of despair and low levels of forgiveness compared to institutionalized older adults (Dezutter, Toussaint, & Leijssen, 2016).

•  There is a gap in the current research of comparing community-dwelling older adults to institutionalized older adults when analyzing the quality of life of older adults.

Significance of the Study •  By 2060, one in four U.S. residents will be older adults from

the influx of baby boomers. Purpose of the Research •  The purpose of this study is to assess the effects that living in

the community has on older adults. Research Question •  What is the effect of living in the community on older adult’s

social ability, physical health, and psychological health? Hypothesis •  Researchers hypothesized that community-dwelling older

adults would have higher levels of social ability, physical health, and psychological health, compared to institutionalized older adults.

RESULTS: PHYSICAL HEALTH

Measures v  Independent Variable:

•  Living Arrangement: One self-report conditional question that was combined in the current study to determine if the individual is community-dwelling or institutionalized (Y/N)

v Dependent Variable: •  Social Ability: One self-report question assessing if physical or

psychological health interfered with social ability (5-point Likert) •  Physical Health: Measured in two separate categories. Four self-report

questions assessing the self-rated view of health and six self-report questions assessing physical functioning (5-point Likert)

•  Psychological Health: Nine self-report questions assessing emotional state (6-point Likert)

RESULTS: PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH

•  57.7% female, 42.3% male •  57.4% 65 to 74, 42.6% greater than 74 •  88.7% White, 6.6% African American, 4.7% Other

6.4

10.6

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Community-Dwelling Ins/tu/onalized

Mostofthe?me

Emotional and Physical Health Problems Interfering Social

Ability

3

7.4

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Community-Dwelling Ins/tu/onalized

Allofthe?me

Emotional and Physical Health Problems Interfering Social

Ability

16.4

20.5

0

5

10

15

20

25

Community-Dwelling Ins/tu/onalized

Someofthe?me

Emotional and Physical Health Problems Interfering Social

Ability

16.6

18.6

15.5

16

16.5

17

17.5

18

18.5

19

Community-Dwelling Ins/tu/onalized

Ali@leofthe?me

Emotional and Physical Health Problems Interfering Social

Ability

57.6

42.9

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Community-Dwelling Ins/tu/onalized

Noneofthe?me

Emotional and Physical Health Problems Interfering Social

Ability

T-Test Analysis •  Significant difference was found for level of physical functioning (t(3,115.32) = -20.76, p < .

001). Mean level of physical functioning of community-dwelling older adults (M = 16.99, SD = 1.84) was significantly better than institutionalized older adults (M = 15.85, SD = 3.01).

•  Significant difference was found for self-rated view of health (t(3,068.74) = -13.23, p < .001). Mean self-rated view of health for community-dwelling older adults (M = 14.51, SD = 3.57) was significantly more positive than institutionalized older adults (M = 13.59, SD = 3.73).

16.99

14.5115.85

13.59

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

PhysicalHealth:PhysicalFunc/oning PhysicalHealth:Self-Rated

MeanPhysicalHealth

Community-Dwelling Ins/tu/onalized

T-Test Analysis •  A significant difference was found for psychological health

(t(2,938.03) = -14.46, p < .001). •  Mean psychological health of community-dwelling older adults

(M = 39.76, SD = 8.06) was significantly higher than institutionalized older adults (M = 37.34, SD = 8.87).

39.76

37.34

36

36.5

37

37.5

38

38.5

39

39.5

40

Community-Dwelling Ins/tu/onalized

Mean Psychological Health

Summary of Findings •  Overall, the results support the hypothesis that community-

dwelling older adults have higher levels of social ability, psychological health, and physical health, compared to institutionalized older adults.

Implications for Research and Practice •  The study provided insight on the need to change the current

method of thinking from intervention-based to prevention-based in order to create aging-friendly communities that promote positive social, psychological, and physical health.

Strengths and Limitations •  Large sample size that is representative of all older adults. •  Majority of study participants were community-dwelling. •  The study provides foundational support on the effects of

living arrangement by analyzing both community-dwelling older adults and institutionalized older adults.

Table 2 Descriptive Statistics: Study Variables (N = 177,760)

Variables n %

Independent Variable

Living Arrangement

Community-dwelling 156,801 98.0

Institutionalized 3,190 2.0

Dependent Variables

Social Ability

All of the time 6,143 3.6

Most of the time 13,297 7.7

Some of the time 30,198 17.5

A little of the time 28,305 16.4

None of the time 94,242 54.7

Psychological Health M = 39.12 SD = 8.46

Physical Health: Self-rated M = 14.21 SD = 3.74

Physical Health: Physical functioning M = 16.85 SD = 1.98