Third Annual Ukrainian Municipal Survey

The International Republican Institutewww.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls

Governmentof CanadaIRI

Results of municipal surveys conducted by Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents), February 2016 (19,200 respondents), and February 2017 (19,200 respondents)

IRI third municipal surveyRatings of Ukrainian Сities -

Rating Group Ukrainewww.ratinggroup.ua

www.ratingpro.org

Summary rating of oblast centers of Ukrainewww.ratingpro.org

Index of satisfaction with the quality of 22 public goods and services

where 1 is «terrible», 2 – «bad», 3 – «average», 4 – «good», and 5 – «excellent»


Governmentof Canada

Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», Mar. 2015 (17,600 resp.), Feb. 2016 (19,200 resp.), and Feb. 2017 (19,200 resp.) Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. IRI

Dynamics of changes in the Index (2016-2017) of satisfaction with the quality of

public goods and services

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

2,72,82,82,82,82,82,82,82,82,93,03,03,03,03,03,03,13,13,13,23,23,33,33,5

KhersonUzhgorodMykolaiv

ChernivtsiSumy

OdesaZaporizhia

KropyvnytskyiKyiv

DniproSeverodonetsk

ChernihivCherkasy

PoltavaZhytomyr

LvivIvano-Frankivsk

KhmelnytskyyMariupolTernopil

RivneLutsk

KharkivVinnytsia

Index has worsened

Index has not changed

Index has improved not much

Index has improved

Index has improved a lot

Vinnytsia3.5

Water supply Schools

Universities,

Heating Trash collection and gardensKindergartensSewage Sidewalks ParkingRoadstechnical institutes,

facilitiesSports

institutionsMedicaland areas

Yards

near buildings infrastructureTransportation

trade premisesStreet markets,

lightingStreet

Police premisesCulture

industrial developmentIndustrial zones,for persons

Accessibility

Communal sphere Infrastructure Humanitarian sphere EcologyPolice

Ecology

Kharkiv3.3

Lutsk3.3

Rivne3.2

Ternopil3.2

Mariupol3.1

Ivano-Frankivsk3.1

Khmelnytskyy3.1

Index has improved


Index has worsened

3.2 Index value (rating)

Summary rating of oblast centers of Ukrainewww.ratingpro.orgIndex of satisfaction with the quality of

22 public goods and serviceswhere 1 is «terrible», 2 – «bad», 3 – «average», 4 – «good», and 5 – «excellent»


Governmentof Canada


with disabilities collegesPublic parks

Lviv3.0

Zhytomyr3.0

Poltava3.0

Cherkasy3.0

Chernihiv3.0

Severodonetsk3.0

Dnipro2.9

Kyiv2.8



Governmentof Canada


Communal sphere Infrastructure Humanitarian sphere EcologyPoliceIndex has improved


Index has worsened



Universities,


facilitiesSports


Yards



lightingStreet



Accessibility

Ecologywith disabilities collegesPublic parks



Kropyvnytskyi2.8

Zaporizhia2.8

Odesa2.8

Sumy2.8

Chernivtsi2.8

Uzhgorod2.8

Kherson2.7

Mykolaiv2.8



Governmentof Canada




Index has improved


Index has worsened


Communal sphere Infrastructure Humanitarian sphere EcologyPolice


Universities,


facilitiesSports


Yards



lightingStreet



Accessibility

Ecologywith disabilities collegesPublic parks

www.ratingpro.org


Governmentof Canada


Rating of oblast centers of Ukraine by areas

Vinnytsia

Kharkiv

Lutsk

Rivne

Ternopil

Mariupol

Khm

elnytskyy

Ivano-Frankivsk

Lviv

Zhytomyr

Poltava

Cherkasy

Chernihiv

Severodonetsk

Dnipro

Kyiv

Kropyvnytskyi

Zaporizhia

Odesa

Sum

y

Chernivtsi

Mykolaiv

Uzhgorod

Kherson

2,0

2,2

2,4

2,6

2,8

3,0

3,2

3,4

3,6

3,8

4,0

Ecology

Humanitarian sphere

Medical institutions

Communal sphere

Infrastructure

Index of satisfaction with the quality of public goods and services


Rating of opportunities in the citieswww.ratingpro.org


Governmentof Canada


Index of satisfaction with the opportunities in the cities

2,92,92,92,92,92,93,03,03,03,03,13,13,13,13,13,13,13,13,23,33,43,43,43,5

Kherson

Severodonetsk

Zaporizhia

Mykolaiv

Mariupol

Kyiv

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Poltava

Chernivtsi

Uzhgorod

Cherkasy

Chernihiv

Dnipro

Kharkiv

Khmelnytskyy

Sumy

Zhytomyr

Lviv

Vinnytsia

Ternopliv

Rivne

Ivano-Frankivsk

LutskIndex consists of 9 indicators(average index for all cities is shown):

To move freely in all districts and quarters of the city 3,6

To freely exercise spiritual rights 3,4

To freely express thoughts and beliefs 3,4

To enjoy a variety of leisure and cultural activities 3,4

To obtain high-quality education of different professions 3,3

To achieve full potential and pursue own dreams 3,0

To engage in entrepreneurship 2,7

To take part in the decision-making processes 2,7

To be paid enough money for work 2,4


Personal security feeling in the city (2015-2017)

% of respondents who feel absolutely or mostly safe walking home alone at night

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Surveywas not conducted

Kyiv Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

March 2015

February 2016

50-59% 40-49% 30-39% 20-29%60-69%

www.ratingpro.org

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

February 2017

Dynamics of changes in the security feeling in the city(average % for all the cities is shown)

2015

51%

2016

48%

2017

% of respondents who feel absolutely or mostly safe walking home alone at night

51%

(22 cities) (24 cities) (24 cities)


Governmentof Canada


Sense of pride for the city

Index of the sense of pride for the citywhere «definitely proud of their city» – 3, «somewhat proud» – 2,

«not very proud» – 1, «definitely not proud» – 0


Governmentof CanadaIRI

www.ratingpro.org

Vinnytsia

2,5

Lviv

Kharkiv

TernopilUzhgorod

2,4

2,2

Rivne

Lutsk

2,1

Cherkasy Khmelnytskyy

2,0

Zhytomyr

1,9Kherson

KropyvnytskyiSeverodonetsk

MykolaivMariupol

ZaporizhiaChernihiv

KyivPoltava

Ivano-Frankivsk

2,3

Dnipro

Sumy

Odesa

Chernivtsi

2,5

2015 2016

2,3

2017(22 cities) (24 cities) (24 cities)

2,5

average Index for all the cities

Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», Mar. 2015 (17,600 resp.), Feb. 2016 (19,200 resp.), and Feb. 2017 (19,200 resp.) Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada.

Reasons for pride for the citywww.ratingpro.org

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Mar

iup

ol

Dn

ipro

Sev

ero

do

net

sk

Kh

erso

n

Kro

pyv

nyt

skyi

Kh

mel

nyt

skyy

Kyi

v

Kh

arki

v

Riv

ne

Ch

erka

sy

Su

my

Vin

nyt

sia

Ch

ern

ihiv

Zap

ori

zhia

Myk

ola

iv

Uzh

go

rod

Po

ltav

a

Zh

yto

myr

Tern

op

il

Od

esa

Ivan

o-F

ran

kivs

k

Ch

ern

ivts

i

Lu

tsk

Lvi

v


Governmentof Canada

Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», Mar. 2015 (17,600 resp.), Feb. 2016 (19,200 resp.), and Feb. 2017 (19,200 resp.) Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada IRI

$$ $

$

$ $

$

$

$

$$ $

$$

$

$

$ $

$ $ $ $

$

$

My city preserves the culture and traditions of my country/region

My city attracts tourists and guests

My city has good living conditions

Any individual can realize his/her dreams in my city

My city is attractive for investors

My city has an efficient economy

$

www.ratingpro.org


Governmentof Canada


Level of satisfaction with the municipal authorities

Level has worsened

No changes

Level has improved (as compared to 2016)

Level of satisfaction with the municipal authorities

% of the respondents who are ‘definitely’ or ‘rather’ satisfied with the composition of the city council and mayor

elected during the last local elections

Mayor City council

20%20%21%25%27%30%31%34%38%39%40%41%42%46%50%53%56%60%61%65%66%68%71%72%

Kherson

Poltava

Severodonetsk

Uzhgorod

Rivne

Kropyvnytskyi

Kyiv

Chernivtsi

Mykolaiv

Sumy

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Lviv

Vinnytsia

Chernihiv

Khmelnytskyy

Mariupol

Lutsk

Odesa

Cherkasy

Ternopil

Ivano-Frankivsk

Kharkiv

12%19%16%

22%21%

25%17%

26%26%31%33%30%31%31%

45%39%32%

47%47%43%44%

51%56%49%

Kherson

PoltavaSeverodonetsk

Uzhgorod

Rivne

Kropyvnytskyi

Kyiv

Chernivtsi

Mykolaiv

Sumy

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Lviv

Vinnytsia

Chernihiv

Khmelnytskyy

Mariupol

Lutsk

Odesa

Cherkasy

Ternopil

Ivano-Frankivsk

Kharkiv

Assessment of interaction experience with city authorities

Vin

nytsia

Ch

ernih

iv

Index of satisfaction with the interactions with city authorities


among those who have addressed city council over the last two years

www.ratingpro.org

Manner in which office staff treated the citizen who adressed

Quality of service received

Level of office staff's knowledge on the subject matter

Waiting time

Kh

arkiv

Kh

meln

ytskyy

Terno

pil

Ch

erkasy

Ivano

-Fran

kivsk

Myko

laiv

Lviv

Kro

pyvn

ytskyi

Uzh

go

rod

Severo

do

netsk

Lu

tsk

Po

ltava

Su

my

Zh

ytom

yr

Mariu

po

l

Ch

ernivtsi

Kyiv

Dn

ipro R

ivne

Od

esa

Kh

erson

Zap

orizh

ia

1,7

1,9

2,1

2,3

2,5

2,7

2,9

3,1

3,3

3,5


Governmentof Canada


Assessment of city authorities in terms of the management areas

Index of assessment of city authorities in terms of the management areas

where 3 is «strongly agree», 2 – «somewhat agree», 1 – «somewhat disagree», 0 – «strongly disagree»

www.ratingpro.org

0,5

0,9

1,3

1,7

2,1

2,5

City image improvement

Public safety improvement

Investment securing

High-quality paperwork

Transparent activity

Citizen participation in decision-making

Vin

nytsia

Ivano

-Fran

kivsk

Lu

tsk

Mariu

po

l

Kh

meln

ytskyy

Kh

arkiv

Terno

pil

Ch

erkasy

Ch

ernih

iv

Lviv

Myko

laiv

Zh

ytom

yr

Od

esa

Uzh

go

rod

Su

my

Dn

ipro

Rivn

e

Ch

ernivtsi

Zap

orizh

ia

Po

ltava

Severo

do

netsk

Kro

pyvn

ytskyi

Kh

erson

Kyiv


Governmentof Canada


Assessment of the situation in the city and country

www.ratingpro.org


Governmentof Canada


9%

10%

9%

5%

13%

15%

15%

11%

15%

13%

18%

12%

15%

14%

8%

9%

23%

8%

14%

11%

12%

17%

29%

10%

9%

10%

14%

15%

18%

20%

22%

23%

24%

26%

26%

27%

28%

31%

31%

37%

38%

39%

45%

45%

46%

50%

54%

61%

Kherson

Severodonetsk

Sumy

Mykolaiv

Poltava

Kropyvnytskyi

Kyiv

Rivne

Chernivtsi

Dnipro

Zaporizhia

Zhytomyr

Uzhgorod

Chernihiv

Mariupol

Odesa

Lviv

Kharkiv

Cherkasy

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Lutsk

Vinnytsia

Ivano-Frankivsk

30%

2015 2016 2017(22 cities) (24 cities) (24 cities)

29%


30%

generally think that things in the cityare going in the right direction

22%

2015 2016 2017(22 cities) (24 cities) (24 cities)

16%


13%

generally think that things in Ukraineare going in the right direction

Level of approval of the institutions activities www.ratingpro.org

Balance of the rates «approve» and «disapprove» the activities

Aggregate result for all the cities

-73%

-68%

-59%

-58%

-56%

-39%

-36%

-33%

-29%

-18%

-15%

-1%

5%

7%

10%

15%

17%

26%

37%

41%

Parliament of Ukraine


Governmentof Canada


Government of Ukraine

Prosecutors office

Courts

President of Ukraine

Communal enterprises

National Anti-Corruption Bureau

Oblast state administration

Oblast council

Executive committee

City council

Police

National media

City Head

Local media

Neighborhood associations (OSBB, OSN)

National Guard

NGOs

ArmyChurch

Level of approval of the institutions activities in dynamicswww.ratingpro.org


Governmentof Canada


President Parliament Government Oblast state administration

City Head City council Executive committee Oblast council

2015 2016 2017

38% 25% 18%2015 2016 2017

27% 16% 10%2015 2016 2017

27% 13% 13%2015 2016 2017

22% 24% 21%

2015 2016 2017

35% 41% 49%2015 2016 2017

30% 33% 35%2015 2016 2017

25% 27% 32%2015 2016 2017

22% 25% 22%

of the respondents who approve the activities of the institution % (average indicator for all the cities)



Governmentof Canada


Army National Guard Police (militia)

Courts Prosecutors office

2015 2016 2017

63% 62% 61%2015 2016 2017

54% 52% 48%2015 2016 2017

22% 38% 42%

2015 2016 2017

12% 13% 12%2015 2016 2017

13% 13% 11%




Governmentof Canada



Church NGOs OSBB, OSN

Local media National media

2015 2016 2017

61% 63% 62%2015 2016 2017

52% 51% 53%2015 2016 2017

38% 35% 42%

2015 2016 2017

49% 51% 49%2015 2016 2017

48% 47% 47%

Comparison of the rates of city development according to mayor

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariuplo

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Index of satisfaction with the quality of public goods and services


45-54% 35-44% 25-34% 15-24%>55% 5-14%

think that things in the cityare going in the right direction

60-69% 50-59% 40-49% 30-39%>70% 20-29%

satisfied with the mayor,elected during the last elections

www.ratingpro.org

3.1 3.0 2.9 2.8>3.2 2.7


Governmentof Canada


The spread of corruption at the local levelwww.ratingpro.org

Іndex of frequency of corruption actsHad to do a favor, give a gift or pay a bribe to a local official

in order to get service or document

where 3 is «more than 5 times», 2 – «3-5 times», 1 – «1-2 times», 0 – «never»

Dynamics of changes in Index (2016-2017) of frequency of corruption acts

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytsky

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

0,10,1

0,30,30,30,40,40,40,40,40,40,40,40,40,40,50,50,50,50,50,50,6

0,70,7

Severodonetsk

Mykolaiv

Lviv

Kherson

Sumy

Vinnytsia

Zhytomyr

Cherkasy

Chernihiv

Lutsk

Kyiv

Ivano-Frankivsk

Chernivtsi

Odesa

Kropyvnytskyi

Poltava

Rivne

Ternopil

Dnipro

Mariupol

Zaporizhia

Kharkiv

Uzhgorod

Khmelnytskyy

Situation has worsened

Situation has not changed

Situation has improved

Dynamics of changes in Index of frequency of corruption acts(average index for all cities is shown)

0,5

2015

0,4

2016

0,4

2017


Governmentof Canada


www.ratingpro.org


Governmentof Canada


Comparison of the levels of corruption and pessimism towards its reduction

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Index of frequency of corruption actsHad to do a favor, give a gift or pay a bribe to a local official

in order to get service or document

where 3 is «more than 5 times», 2 – «3-5 times», 1 – «1-2 times», 0 – «never»

Value higher than average

Value lower than average

Level of pessimism towards corruption reductionDo not see any effective measures to decrease corruption because are convinced that

nothing will help because municipal authorities are powerless, as anti-corruption efforts fully depend on central authorities

0,4Value higher than average

Value lower than average

28%

0,1 0,7

10% 52%

www.ratingpro.org


Governmentof Canada


European integration moods in the cities

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

80-90%

70-79%

60-69%

50-59%

40-49%

30-39%

20-29%

70-79%

60-69%

50-59%

40-49%

30-39%

20-29%

10-19%

average % for all the cities

2015

63%

2016

54%

2017

57%


Support for Ukraine joining NАТО

Support for the economic integration of Ukraine with the European Union


2015

49%

2016

41%

2017

47%


Usually move around the citywww.ratingpro.org


Governmentof Canada


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Sev

ero

do

net

sk

Uzh

go

rod

Kh

erso

n

Riv

ne

Ivan

o-F

ran

kivs

k

Kro

pyv

nyt

skyi

Po

ltav

a

Ch

erka

sy

Zh

yto

myr

Lvi

v

Ch

ern

ivts

i

Tern

op

il

Kh

mel

nyt

skyy

Lu

tsk

Od

esa

Kh

arki

v

Mar

iup

ol

Ch

ern

ihiv

Vin

nyt

sia

Dn

ipro

Myk

ola

iv

Su

my

Zap

ori

zhia

Kyi

v

By public transport

By car

On foot

By bicycle

Level of comfort while moving around the citywww.ratingpro.org


Governmentof Canada


Index of comfort while moving around the citywhere 1 is «terrible», 2 – «bad», 3 – «average», 4 – «good», and 5 – «excellent»

2,62,72,72,72,82,82,92,92,93,03,03,03,03,13,13,23,23,23,33,33,33,43,43,6

Kherson

Kropyvnytskyi

Chernivtsi

Odesa

Uzhgorod

Sumy

Mykolaiv

Zaporizhia

Cherkasy

Kyiv

Zhytomyr

Poltava

Severodonetsk

Dnipro

Ivano-Frankivsk

Kharkiv

Lviv

Khmelnytskyy

Ternopil

Chernihiv

Rivne

Mariupol

Lutsk

Vinnytsia

Experience of travels outside own citywww.ratingpro.org


Governmentof Canada


Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%

Have traveled over the last 5 years outside the city to...

countries of Europe

CIS countries

resorts abroad

other regions of Ukraine

(Egypt, Turkey, Bulgaria, etc.)

Severodonetsk

17%average % for all the cities

20%

16%

63%

Experience of travels to other oblast centers of Ukrainewww.ratingpro.org


Governmentof Canada


Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherksay

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

from Lutsk

from Lviv

from Uzhgorod

from Ternopil

from Iv.-Frankivsk

from Rivne

from Khmelnytskyy

from Chernivtsi

0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%

Have visited other cities over the last 5 years citizens of the West of Ukraine

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi



Governmentof Canada


from Chernihiv

from Zhytomyr

from Vinnytsia

from Kyiv

from Cherkasy

from Sumy

from Poltava

from Kropyvnytskyi

0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%

Have visited other cities over the last 5 years citizens of the Center of Ukraine

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi



Governmentof Canada


from Kharkiv

from Dnipro

from Zaporizhia

from Mariupol

from Severodonetsk

from Odesa

from Mykolaiv

from Kherson

0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%

Have visited other cities over the last 5 years citizens of the South and East of Ukraine

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

www.ratingpro.org


Governmentof Canada


Values

State should take more responsibility in taking care

of life of every citizen

People should take more responsibility in taking care

of their lives

64%28%

Income of population should be made more equal

Individual activities of citizens should be stimulated through possibility of income increase

41% 49%

State property in business and industry

should be increased

Private property in business and industry

should be increased

49%33%

State should control (regulate)

more activities of businesses

State should provide more freedom for

development of businesses

33% 56%


www.ratingpro.org


Governmentof Canada


Comparison of the support for EU and democratic model

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

Support for the economic integration of Ukraine with the European Union

A democratic system of governance is more important than a prosperous economy

Kyiv

Severodonetsk

Mariupol

Kharkiv

Poltava

SumyChernihiv

Zhytomyr

Zaporizhia

Dnipro

Rivne

Lutsk

Lviv

Uzhgorod

Ivano-Frankivsk

Ternopil

Khmelnytskyy

Vinnytsia

Cherkasy

Kropyvnytskyi

Odesa

Mykolaiv

Kherson

Chernivtsi

>70%

60-70%

50-59%

40-49%

30-39%

20-29%

>1.7

1.6-1.7

1.4-1.5

1.2-1.3

1.0-1.1

0.8-0.9

Index where a democratic system is «definitely more important» – 3, «somewhat more important » – 2;

a prosperity is «somewhat more important » – 1, «definitely more important» – 0

Third Annual Ukrainian Municipal Survey

News & Politics

Transcript of Third Annual Ukrainian Municipal Survey