Thesis Presentation - Penn State College of Engineering · 2003-04-22 · April 03 Robert Caruthers...

54
April 03 Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis Thesis Presentation Thesis Presentation 2555 Grand 2555 Grand Crown Center Crown Center Kansas City, MO Kansas City, MO

Transcript of Thesis Presentation - Penn State College of Engineering · 2003-04-22 · April 03 Robert Caruthers...

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Thesis PresentationThesis Presentation

2555 Grand 2555 Grand –– Crown CenterCrown CenterKansas City, MOKansas City, MO

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Robert J. Robert J. CaruthersCaruthersStructural Structural

OptionOption

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline

Background of Existing BuildingBackground of Existing BuildingProposalProposalStructural AnalysisStructural AnalysisSlip form DesignSlip form DesignArchitectural StudyArchitectural StudyAdvantages and Disadvantages for eachAdvantages and Disadvantages for eachConclusions and RecommendationsConclusions and Recommendations

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

BackgroundBackgroundProject Design TeamProject Design Team

Owner:Owner:The Crown Center RedevelopmentThe Crown Center Redevelopment

Architect:Architect:Zimmer Zimmer GunsulGunsul FrascaFrasca PartnershipPartnership

Structural Engineer:Structural Engineer:KPFF Consulting EngineersKPFF Consulting Engineers

Construction Manager:Construction Manager:Havens SteelHavens Steel

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

BackgroundBackgroundBuilding FeaturesBuilding Features

2424--HighHigh--Rise Office BuildingRise Office Building600,000 Square Feet600,000 Square FeetTotal Project Cost of 75 millionTotal Project Cost of 75 millionStart Date: 6/01 End Date: 6/03Start Date: 6/01 End Date: 6/03Primary functions of buildingPrimary functions of building

--Office SpaceOffice Space--Conference SpaceConference Space

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

BackgroundBackgroundArchitectural FeaturesArchitectural Features

Granite Curtain Wall on first couple FloorsGranite Curtain Wall on first couple FloorsRolled Canopy RoofRolled Canopy RoofPrePre--cast Concrete Panels the rest of the waycast Concrete Panels the rest of the wayArchitectural Glass Windows on exteriorArchitectural Glass Windows on exteriorTotal Height 325 ftTotal Height 325 ftAverage floor to floor height approximately 13 Average floor to floor height approximately 13 ftft

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

BackgroundBackground

Structural FeaturesStructural FeaturesCombination of Structural Steel beams and columnsCombination of Structural Steel beams and columnsLateral Braced Framing in the coreLateral Braced Framing in the coreComposite Metal Deck Concrete Flooring SystemComposite Metal Deck Concrete Flooring SystemRolled Canopy RoofRolled Canopy RoofMostly Shear ConnectionsMostly Shear ConnectionsFloor slab thickness is 6”Floor slab thickness is 6”

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

BackgroundBackground

Mechanical/ElectricalMechanical/ElectricalHeaters range from 5 to 30 Heaters range from 5 to 30 kwattskwattsDomestic Water Heaters sizes range from 40 to 80 Domestic Water Heaters sizes range from 40 to 80 gallonsgallonsAir handling units range from 60,000 to 82,000 Air handling units range from 60,000 to 82,000 cfmcfmFan powered Variable Air volume units ranging from Fan powered Variable Air volume units ranging from 250 to 2140 250 to 2140 cfmcfm5 225 A panel Boards per floor5 225 A panel Boards per floorCircuits range from: Three phase 208/120 volts and Circuits range from: Three phase 208/120 volts and 280/277 volts280/277 volts

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline

Background of Existing BuildingBackground of Existing BuildingProposalProposalStructural AnalysisStructural AnalysisSlip form DesignSlip form DesignArchitectural StudyArchitectural StudyAdvantages and Disadvantages for eachAdvantages and Disadvantages for eachConclusions and RecommendationsConclusions and Recommendations

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

ProposalProposalStructuralStructural

Looking into the Lateral system that was used in the building

- Existing System: Braced Frame in the Core

- Proposed System:Change the tube steel braced frames

to concrete shear walls

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

ProposalProposal

Existing Lateral SystemExisting Lateral System

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

ProposalProposal

Proposed Shear WallsProposed Shear Walls

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

ProposalProposal

ArchitecturalArchitecturalExisting Exterior Wall:Existing Exterior Wall:

--Granite on the first couple floors all Granite on the first couple floors all around the exterior of the buildingaround the exterior of the building

Proposed Change:Proposed Change:-- Limestone exteriorLimestone exterior

Look at Advantages and disadvantages of each as well as a Look at Advantages and disadvantages of each as well as a cost analysiscost analysis

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

ProposalProposal

Construction ManagementConstruction ManagementProposal:Proposal:

Vertical Slip formsVertical Slip forms-- Use Vertical Slip forms to erect the shear wallsUse Vertical Slip forms to erect the shear walls--Look into costs issuesLook into costs issues--Different types Different types

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline

Background of Existing BuildingBackground of Existing BuildingProposalProposalStructural AnalysisStructural AnalysisSlip form DesignSlip form DesignArchitectural StudyArchitectural StudyAdvantages and Disadvantages for eachAdvantages and Disadvantages for eachConclusions and RecommendationsConclusions and Recommendations

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisShear Walls Shear Walls

W1,W2 are 60ft W3,W4,W5,W6 are 40ftW1,W2 are 60ft W3,W4,W5,W6 are 40ft

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisFirst Five FloorsFirst Five Floors

#11@5”#11@5”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 6Wall 6#11@5”#11@5”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 5Wall 5#11@5”#11@5”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 4Wall 4#11@5”#11@5”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 3Wall 3#11@5”#11@5”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 2Wall 2#11@5”#11@5”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 1Wall 1

Vertical Vertical Edge ReinEdge Rein

Min Min Rein(V)Rein(V)

Min Min ReinRein(H)(H)

ThicknessThickness

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisFirst Five FloorsFirst Five Floors

Edge Detail Walls 1,2,3,4,5Edge Detail Walls 1,2,3,4,5

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisFirst Five FloorsFirst Five Floors

Edge Detail Wall 6Edge Detail Wall 6

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisNext Five FloorsNext Five Floors

#11@7”#11@7”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 6Wall 6#11@12”#11@12”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 5Wall 5#11@12”#11@12”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 4Wall 4#11@12”#11@12”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 3Wall 3#11@12”#11@12”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 2Wall 2#11@12”#11@12”#4@12”#4@12”#4@7”#4@7”12”12”Wall 1Wall 1

Vertical Vertical Edge ReinEdge Rein

Min Min Rein(V)Rein(V)

Min Min ReinRein(H)(H)

ThicknessThickness

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisNext Five Floors Next Five Floors

Walls 1,2,3,4,5Walls 1,2,3,4,5

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisNext Five floorsNext Five floors

Wall 6Wall 6

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisNext Five FloorsNext Five Floors

#9@13”#9@13”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 6Wall 6#9@13”#9@13”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 5Wall 5#9@13”#9@13”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 4Wall 4#9@13”#9@13”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 3Wall 3#9@13”#9@13”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 2Wall 2#9@13”#9@13”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 1Wall 1

Vertical Vertical Edge ReinEdge Rein

Min Min Rein(V)Rein(V)

Min Min ReinRein(H)(H)

ThicknessThickness

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisNext Five Floors Next Five Floors

Walls 1,2,3,4,5Walls 1,2,3,4,5

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisNext Five floorsNext Five floors

Wall 6Wall 6

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisNext Five FloorsNext Five Floors

#9@6”#9@6”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 6Wall 6#9@12”#9@12”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 5Wall 5#9@12”#9@12”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 4Wall 4#9@12”#9@12”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 3Wall 3#9@12”#9@12”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 2Wall 2#9@12”#9@12”#4@12”#4@12”#4@8”#4@8”10”10”Wall 1Wall 1

Vertical Vertical Edge ReinEdge Rein

Min Min Rein(V)Rein(V)

Min Min ReinRein(H)(H)

ThicknessThickness

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisNext Five Floors Next Five Floors

Walls 1,2,3,4,5Walls 1,2,3,4,5

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisNext Five floorsNext Five floors

Wall 6Wall 6

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisLast Four FloorsLast Four Floors

#9@8”#9@8”#3@18”#3@18”#4@12”#4@12”8”8”Wall 6Wall 6#9@16”#9@16”#3@18”#3@18”#4@12”#4@12”8”8”Wall 5Wall 5#9@16”#9@16”#3@18”#3@18”#4@12”#4@12”8”8”Wall 4Wall 4#9@16”#9@16”#3@18”#3@18”#4@12”#4@12”8”8”Wall 3Wall 3#9@16”#9@16”#3@18”#3@18”#4@12”#4@12”8”8”Wall 2Wall 2#9@16”#9@16”#3@18”#3@18”#4@12”#4@12”8”8”Wall 1Wall 1

Vertical Vertical Edge ReinEdge Rein

Min Min Rein(V)Rein(V)

Min Min ReinRein(H)(H)

ThicknessThickness

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisLast Four Floors Last Four Floors Walls 1,2,3,4,5Walls 1,2,3,4,5

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisLast four floorsLast four floors

Wall 6Wall 6

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Structural AnalysisStructural AnalysisCost AnalysisCost Analysis

Braced Frame Braced Frame vsvs Shear WallsShear Walls(All Cost analysis was done using RS means Assemblies cost data)

$955,723$955,723$757,192$757,192CostCost

Proposed Lateral Proposed Lateral System (Shear System (Shear Walls)Walls)

Existing Lateral Existing Lateral system (braced system (braced frames)frames)

Cost Savings using Braced Frames

$200,000

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline

Background of Existing BuildingBackground of Existing BuildingProposalProposalStructural AnalysisStructural AnalysisSlip form DesignSlip form DesignArchitectural StudyArchitectural StudyAdvantages and Disadvantages for eachAdvantages and Disadvantages for eachConclusions and RecommendationsConclusions and Recommendations

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Slip Form DesignSlip Form Design

Composed of three Composed of three SectionsSections

--yokesyokes--waleswales

--sheathingsheathing

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Slip Form DesignSlip Form Design

Lifting JacksLifting Jacks-- carry vertical loadscarry vertical loads

--can hold as much as 25 tonscan hold as much as 25 tons-- hydraulic jackhydraulic jack

-- Provides movement of form in Provides movement of form in increments of 1”increments of 1”

-- Minimum of 3 minute intervalsMinimum of 3 minute intervals

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Slip Form DesignSlip Form Design

SheathingSheathing--1in nominal board, 3/81in nominal board, 3/8--in plywood in plywood

--1010--gage steel sheets as reinforced backup membersgage steel sheets as reinforced backup members

DepthDepth--depends on the rate of slide depends on the rate of slide

--time required for concrete to strengthen time required for concrete to strengthen -- minimum depth 3 ½ ‘minimum depth 3 ½ ‘

-- Recommend 4’Recommend 4’

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Slip Form DesignSlip Form Design

Sliding OperationSliding Operation--most important in order for economical successmost important in order for economical success

-- speeds range from 12 to 18 in per hrspeeds range from 12 to 18 in per hr-- Recommend speeds about 18 in per hr Recommend speeds about 18 in per hr

How to accomplishHow to accomplish-- better job management and planningbetter job management and planning-- Adequate supply of concrete on siteAdequate supply of concrete on site

-- Materials conveniently stockpiledMaterials conveniently stockpiled-- Qualified superintendent Qualified superintendent

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Slip Form DesignSlip Form Design

Reducing Wall ThicknessReducing Wall Thickness-- very important since thickness of the wall changes every 10 very important since thickness of the wall changes every 10

floorsfloors-- With slip forming this can be doneWith slip forming this can be done

HowHow-- shear wall is completed at level where thickness changesshear wall is completed at level where thickness changes

-- Jacks are partially free of concreteJacks are partially free of concrete-- A filler piece is inserted inside the formsA filler piece is inserted inside the forms

-- Can be removed and replace as you go up the wallCan be removed and replace as you go up the wall

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline

Background of Existing BuildingBackground of Existing BuildingProposalProposalStructural AnalysisStructural AnalysisSlip Form DesignSlip Form DesignArchitectural StudyArchitectural StudyAdvantages and Disadvantages for eachAdvantages and Disadvantages for eachConclusions and RecommendationsConclusions and Recommendations

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Architectural StudyArchitectural Study

Existing FaExisting Faççade:ade:Granite Exterior Type 1, GrayGranite Exterior Type 1, Gray

Advantages and DisadvantagesAdvantages and Disadvantages

Lower rate of water Lower rate of water absorptionabsorption

Will retain its polish longerWill retain its polish longer

No architectural change over No architectural change over timetime

Highly resistive to acidsHighly resistive to acids

More expensiveMore expensiveStrongerStronger

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Architectural StudyArchitectural Study

Proposed Change: Proposed Change: Limestone, Sugar cube finish 5Limestone, Sugar cube finish 5””thick, 5thick, 5’’x14x14’’ panels panels

Advantages and DisadvantagesAdvantages and Disadvantages

Easy material to buyEasy material to buy

Architectural appearance over Architectural appearance over time changestime changes

Could prove to be cheaperCould prove to be cheaper

Absorbs water fasterAbsorbs water faster

Thicker material would have to Thicker material would have to be usedbe used

Weaker compressive strengthWeaker compressive strength

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Architectural StudyArchitectural StudyCost Analysis Cost Analysis

Granite Granite vsvs LimestoneLimestone

Existing Exterior Wall (Granite)

Proposed Exterior Wall (Limestone)

Cost $507,344 $400,894Price Difference $106,450

Using Limestone

Cost Savings: $106,450

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline

Background of Existing BuildingBackground of Existing BuildingProposalProposalStructural AnalysisStructural AnalysisSlip Form DesignSlip Form DesignArchitectural StudyArchitectural StudyAdvantages and Disadvantages for each Advantages and Disadvantages for each Conclusions and RecommendationsConclusions and Recommendations

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Advantages and DisadvantagesAdvantages and DisadvantagesStructuralStructural

Braced FramesBraced Frames

Advantages DisadvantagesAdvantages Disadvantages

--cheaper overall cheaper overall --more labormore labor-- faster erection time faster erection time --more chance of errorsmore chance of errors

Shear WallsShear Walls

Advantages DisadvantagesAdvantages Disadvantages

-- more efficient design more efficient design --more expensivemore expensive-- less labor intensiveless labor intensive --more planningmore planning

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Advantages and DisadvantagesAdvantages and DisadvantagesArchitectureArchitecture

GraniteGraniteAdvantagesAdvantages DisadvantagesDisadvantages

--StrongerStronger --More expensiveMore expensive--Highly resistive to acidsHighly resistive to acids --no color changeno color change--Will retain its polish longerWill retain its polish longer--Lower rate of water absorptionLower rate of water absorption

Limestone

AdvantagesAdvantages DisadvantagesDisadvantages

--cheapercheaper --thicker materialthicker material

--appearance changes appearance changes --absorbs water fasterabsorbs water faster

--weaker weaker

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Advantages and DisadvantagesAdvantages and Disadvantages

Construction managementConstruction management

Slip formsSlip formsAdvantages DisadvantagesAdvantages Disadvantages

--Very efficient Very efficient --expensiveexpensive-- less labor less labor --more careful planningmore careful planning-- fast erectionfast erection --more mechanicalmore mechanical

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline

Background of Existing BuildingBackground of Existing BuildingProposalProposalStructural AnalysisStructural AnalysisSlip Form DesignSlip Form DesignArchitectural StudyArchitectural StudyAdvantages and Disadvantages for each Advantages and Disadvantages for each Conclusions and RecommendationsConclusions and Recommendations

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Conclusions and RecommendationsConclusions and RecommendationsStructural DesignStructural Design

Proposed Proposed DesignDesign

√√√√√√Existing Existing DesignDesign

OverallOverallTimeTimePricePrice

I would recommend Existing Design of Braced Frames

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Conclusions and RecommendationsConclusions and RecommendationsArchitectural DesignArchitectural Design

√√Proposed Proposed Exterior Exterior (limestone)(limestone)

√√√√Existing Exterior Existing Exterior (Granite)(Granite)

OverallOverallAestheticsAestheticsPrice Price

I would recommend existing exterior (granite)

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Special ThanksSpecial Thanks

Dr. Boothby Dr. Boothby The Whole AE Department The Whole AE Department Havens SteelHavens SteelHarold Harold PermeterPermeterFriendsFriends

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

Q&AQ&A

Any Questions ?Any Questions ?

??

??

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

BlaBla

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

BlaBla

April 03

Robert Caruthers Architectural Engineering

Senior Thesis

BlaBla