Thesis Writing in Qatar: Thesis Writing in Bahrain: Thesis Writing in Saudi
Thesis 11.15.11
-
Upload
danielleddi -
Category
Documents
-
view
903 -
download
1
Transcript of Thesis 11.15.11
The Efficacy of the National Survey of Children’s Health at assessing childhood obesity risk in children ages 10-17 years.
1
INTRODUCTION
Childhood Obesity:
31.7% of 2-19 year old children in the U.S. are overweight/obese.
Overweight/obese children are more likely to be overweight/obese into adulthood.
Research indicates several parental factors may contribute to childhood obesity.
2
Reference: 3, 17
Childhood Obesity Models
Several models used to depict variables involved in childhood obesity:
Socio-Economic Model
Ecological Systems Theory
Model of Societal/Environmental Factors Affecting Childhood Obesity
3
Parental Influence on Childhood Obesity
Tabacchi G, Giammanco S, Guardia ML, Giammanco M. (2007) A review of the literature and a new classification of the early determinants of childhood obesity: from pregnancy to the first years of life. Nutrition Research, 27, 587-604.
4
National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH)
National Survey of Children’s Health
Sponsored by the Maternal and Child Health Bureau.
Assesses the physical and emotional health of children ages 0-17.
Age of children chosen for study (10-17 years)
State and Local Area Integrated Telephone Survey (SLAITS):
Used to determine the emotional and physical healthstatus, as well as, children’ access to medical care and insurance in the U.S.
NSCH overview (www.cdc.gov/SLAITS/NSCH)
5
Rationale
Childhood obesity is a growing problem.
Identification of contributing factors can lead to effective intervention efforts.
NSCH is a fairly new surveillance system
Initiated in 2003
Potential to aid in future intervention efforts
6
Purpose
To investigate the extent of variables measured by NSCH that are predictive of childhood obesity risk in children ages 10-17 years.
7
8
What Research Says…
Parents’ Obesity
Genetic factors Higher genetic predisposition when
parents are obese.
Greater risk when both parents are overweight.
Lifestyle factors Parents with higher BMI scores may
live obesity-promoting lifestyles
Parent physical activity: strong positive predictor of childhood inactivity.
References: 26, 29
9
Maternal Pregnancy Nutrition
‘Fetal Origins Theory’ The Dutch Famine: Early
1900’s
Higher rates of Obesity in women exposed to famine in 1st and 2nd trimesters: ‘Thrifty Phenotype Hypothesis’
Diet Composition Low Protein
High fat/cholesterol
Low/High Calorie: Infant and mother weight gain
References: 96, 98, 99, 10, 11, 12, 13
10
Maternal Practices of Breastfeeding and Weaning
Breastfeeding vs formula feeding
Rapid ‘catch-up growth’
Age of weaning
World Health Organization (WHO): > 6 mos
Department of Health (DOH): > 4 mos
Infant’s developmental progress
References: 100, 84-86, 6, 10, 11, 8, 91, 90, 87, 88
11
Parental Employment Status
Shift away from traditional dynamic: Father = breadwinner and mother stays home. Both parents lead busy lifestyles.
Research has shown mothers working more hours more likely to have overweight children.
However, two incomes may result in access to healthier choices.
References: 3, 17, 18
12
Parental Education
Higher parental education linked to higher physical activity in children.
Research indicates inverse relationship between childhood obesity and education level of head of household.
Parents who are educated on the importance of health may be more inclined to make healthier choices for their families.
References: 15, 16, 26
13
Socioeconomic Status
Research is inconsistent. Studies looking at nutrient level
data found little association.
Studies looking at specific food groups found relationships.
One study found SES positively related to fruit/vegetable consumption and negatively related to fast food consumption.
Study by Ogden, et al found childhood obesity prevalence decreases as income increases, however, most obese children are not low income.
References: 16, 18, 19
14
Single Mother or No-worker Father
Journal of Pediatrics: middle school children with unemployed father had increased risk compared to working fathers.
Children of single mothers or unemployed parents more likely to develop obesity.
References: 1, 2
15
Attitudes of Mother
Mother’s mental and emotional characteristics
Mother’s perception of Child’s weight
Mother’s concern for her child’s weight from personal experience
Maternal restriction
References: 60-62, 68, 63, 64, 73, 82, 70, 72
16
Number of Siblings
Children of the same family will learn the same food culture
However, others argue that each child is different
Weight status of child
Concern of mother for child increases pressure to eat or restrict to change food culture
Genetic and environmental factors influence food culture and weight
References: 50, 52, 57, 59
17
Religion and Beliefs
No direct research literature
Participation in religion is inversely related to increased body weight
Stress-coping mechanism, social support and doctrine itself
Some religions promote dietary restriction Catholicism, Judaism, Seventh Day Adventists
What about prayer, reading your bible?
References: 43, 46, 48, 41, 49
18
Built Environment
Grocery store access Linked with open space and width
of streets
Physical activity level varies based on: SES Housing and neighborhood
characteristics Presence of parks and
walking/biking paths Age of parks
Sex of child Distance from school
Friends in the area Parent’s perception of
neighborhood safety
References: 120, 121, 125, 127, 129
19
OUR Model20
Methodology
Study Design
Non-experimental
Analytical
Key Variables:
Dependent: BMI
Independent: Childhood Obesity Factors
IRB Approval Level - Exempt
21
Statistical Procedures
Data available for use through the NSCH. Analyzed using SPSS version 19.
Computed Frequencies and Chi Square.
Variables were recoded.
22
Sample Population Results23
45,897 Children aged 10-17 made up the study 23,866 Males 21,985 Females
Other Descriptive Statistics available: Federal Poverty level based on SCHIP qualification Family structure Parental Marital/Cohabitation Status Parent Social Support Religious service attendance Parental physical activity per week Parental Mental and Emotional Health Status Parental General Health Parent Stress Coping Ability Parent-Child Relationship Status
24
4940 10.8%
4673 10.2%
5380 11.7%
5861 12.8%
6088 13.3%
6720 14.6%
6952 15.1%
Child's Age
10
11
13
14
15
16
17
21,97552.1%
23,85547.9%
Sex of Child
Male
Female
Child Statistics
25
4935 10.9%
31,88070.7%
4632 10.3%
1897 4.2%
1776 3.9%
Ethnicity/Race
Hispanic
White
Black
Multi-racial
Other
2186 5.0%
29,121 66%
6754 15.3%
6040 13.7%
Child's BMI
Underweight
Healthy Weight
Overweight
Obese
Child Statistics
26
20,67245.0%
16,45235.8%
6043 13.2%
2729 5.9%
Number of Siblings
1
2
3
4+
20,67145.0%
14,77432.2%
8921 19.4%
1315 2.9%
214 0.5%
Birth Position
1
2
3
4
5
Siblings
Family Members27
33,42872.8%
9656 21.0%
2806 6.1%
Respondent Relationship to Child
Mother
Father
All Other
29,24164.1%
4910 10.8%
8027 17.6%
3446 7.6%
Family Structure
Two Parent; Biological/AdoptedTwo Parent; Step Family
Single Mother; No Father presentOther Family Type
Education28
3261 7.8%
9209 21.9%
29,49970.3%
Mother Education Level
Less than High School
High School Graduate
More than High School
2676 7.6%
8414 23.9%24,128
68.5%
Father Education Level
Less than High School
High School Graduate
More than High School
Income29
41,25690.9%
4107 9.1%
Parent Empolyment status at least 50 out
of past 52 weeks
Yes
No
4824 10.5%
7378 16.1%
15,57633.9%
18,11939.5%
Federal Poverty Level based on DHHS
Guidelines
0-99% FPL
100-199% FPL
200-399% FPL
400% FPL +
30
Results of Hypothesis Testing
Maternal General Health Status
Hₒ1a: There is no association between childhood obesity and maternal general health status.
REJECTED(p value = .000)
Maternal General Health Status
Health Status Excellent Very Good and
GoodFair and poor Total
Underweight and Healthy Weight
8787 (30.2%) 17773 (61.2%) 2501 (8.6%) 29061 (100.0%)
Overweight and Obese
2458 (21.2%) 7437 (64.2%) 1686 (14.6%) 11581 (100.0%)
Total 11245 (27.7%) 25210 (62.0%) 4187 (10.3%) 40642 (100.0%)
31
Paternal General Health Status
Hₒ1b: There is no association between childhood obesity and paternal general health status.
REJECTED (p value = .000)
Paternal General Health Status
Health Status ExcellentVery good and
goodFair and poor Total
Underweight and Healthy Weight
7259 (28.9%) 16219 (64.6%) 1635 (6.5%) 25113 (100.0%)
Overweight and Obese
1946 (21.3%) 6195 (67.9%) 981 (10.8%) 9122 (100.0%)
Total 9205 (26.9%) 22414 (65.5%) 2616 (7.6%) 34235(100.0%)
32
Maternal Physical Activity Level
Hₒ2a: There is no association between childhood obesity and maternal physical activity level.
REJECTED (p value = .000)
Mother’s days of Physical Activity (PA) per week
Underweight and Healthy Weight
Overweight and Obese Total
0 days of PA 6253 (68.0%) 2948 (32.0%) 9201 (100.0%)
1 to 4 days of PA 15467 (72.7%) 5808 (27.3%) 21275 (100.0%)
5 to 7 days of PA 7217 (72.4%) 2749 (27.6%) 9966 (100.0%)
33
Paternal Physical Activity Level
Hₒ2b: There is no association between childhood obesity
and paternal physical activity level.
REJECTED (p value = .000)
Father’s days of Physical Activity (PA) per week
Underweight and Healthy Weight Overweight and Obese Total
0 days of PA 4425 (70.4%) 1859 (29.6%) 6284 (100.0%)
1 to 4 days of PA 11738 (75.4%) 3837 (24.6%) 15575 (100.0%)
5 to 7 days of PA 8733 (72.4%) 3321 (27.6%) 12054 (100.0%)
34
Maternal Mental and Emotional Health
Hₒ3a: There is no association between childhood obesity and maternal mental and emotional health status.
ACCEPTED (p value = .929)
Maternal Mental and Emotional Health Status
Health Status Excellent Very Good and
Good
Fair and poor Total
Underweight and
Healthy Weight
10324 (35.3%) 17252 (58.9%) 1691 (5.8%) 29267 (100.0%)
Overweight and
Obese
4192 (35.3%) 6993 (58.8%) 698 (5.9%) 11883 (100.0%)
Total 14516 24245 2389 41150
35
Paternal Mental and Emotional Health
Hₒ3b: There is no association between childhood obesity and paternal mental and emotional health status.
ACCEPTED (p value = .861)
Paternal Mental and Emotional Health Status
Health Status Excellent Very Good and
Good
Fair and poor Total
Underweight and
Healthy Weight
9773 (39.2%) 14136 (56.8%) 996 (4.0%) 24905 (100.0%)
Overweight and
Obese
3991 (39.5%) 5702 (56.4%) 409 (4.0%) 10102 (100.0%)
Total 13764 19838 1405 35007
36
Paternal Perceptions of Child Health
Hₒ3c: There is no association between childhood obesity and parental perceptions of child health status.
REJECTED (p value = .000)
Parent’s Perception of Child health Status
Parent reported
child health
status
ExcellentVery Good and
GoodFair and poor Total
Underweight and
Healthy Weight
21273 (68.0%) 9471 (30.3%) 557 (1.8%) 31301 (100.0%)
Overweight and
Obese
6493 (50.8%) 5743 (44.9%) 553 (4.3%) 12789 (100.0%)
Total 27766 15214 1110 44090
37
Maternal Education Level
Hₒ4a: There is no association between childhood obesity and maternal education status.
REJECTED (p value = .000)
Mother Highest Education Level Completed
Education Level
Completed
Less than high school
12 years/high school graduate
More than high school
Total
Underweight and Healthy Weight
1639 (5.7%) 5846 (20.2%) 21411 (74.1%) 28896 (100.0%)
Overweight and Obese
1217 (10.6%) 3018 (26.3%) 7262 (63.2%) 11497 (100.0%)
Total 2856 (7.1%) 8864 (21.9%) 28673 (71.0%) 40393 (100.0%)
38
Paternal Education Level
Hₒ4b: There is no association between childhood obesity and paternal education status.
REJECTED (p value = .000)
Father Highest Education Level Completed
Education Level
Completed
Less than high school
12 years/high school graduate
More than high school
Total
Underweight and Healthy Weight
1405 (5.6%) 5433 (21.8%) 18095 (72.6%) 24933 (100.0%)
Overweight and Obese
1002 (11.1%) 2678 (29.7%) 5348 (59.2%) 9037 (100.0%)
Total 2407 (7.1%) 8120 (23.9) 23443 (69.0%) 33970 (100.0%)
39
Parent Employment Status
Hₒ5a: There is no association between childhood obesity and parent employment status.
REJECTED (p value = .000)
Was anyone in the household employed at least 50 weeks out of the past 52 weeks?
Employment Status No Yes Total
Underweight and Healthy Weight
2341 (7.6%) 28656 (92.4%) 30997 (100.0%)
Overweight and Obese
1467 (11.6%) 11168 (88.4%) 12635 (100.0%)
Total 3808 (8.7%) 39824 (91.3%) 43632 (100.0%)
40
Parent Income
Hₒ6a: There is no association between childhood obesity and household poverty level based on DHHS guidelines.
REJECTED (p value = .000)
Poverty level of this household based on DHHS guidelines
0-99% Federal Poverty Level
100-199% Federal Poverty
Level
200-399% Federal Poverty
Level
400% Federal Poverty Level
or greaterTotal
Underweight and Healthy Weight
2436 (7.8%) 4453 (14.2%) 10673 (34.1%) 13745 (43.9%) 31307 (100.0%)
Overweight and Obese
1891 (14.8%) 2539 (19.8%) 4459 (34.9%) 3905 (30.5%) 12794 (100.0%)
Total 4327 (9.8%) 6992 (15.9%) 15132 (34.3%) 17650 (40.0%) 44101 (100.0%)
41
Parent Income
Hₒ6b: There is no association between childhood obesity and household poverty level based on SCHIP qualifications.
REJECTED (p value = .000)
Poverty level of this household based on DHHS guidelines based on SCHIP qualifications
0-99% Federal Poverty Level
100-199% Federal
Poverty Level
200-399% Federal
Poverty Level
400% Federal Poverty Level
or greaterTotal
Underweight and Healthy Weight
6889 (22.0%) 5551 (17.7%) 5122 (16.4%) 13745 (43.9%) 31307 (100.0%)
Overweight and Obese
4430 (34.6%) 2513 (19.6%) 1946 (15.2%) 3905 (30.5%) 12794 (100.0%)
Total 11319 (25.7%)
8064 (18.3%) 7068 (16.0%) 17650 (40.0%) 44101 (100.0%)
42
Parental Marital Cohabitation Status
Hₒ7a: There is no association between childhood obesity and parental marital cohabitation status.
REJECTED (p value = .000)
Marital/Cohabitation Status of Child's Parent(s) in the Household
Married Cohabitating NeitherNo parents in the household
Total
Underweight and Healthy Weight
23905 (76.8%) 1241 (4.0%) 5008 (16.1%) 954 (3.1%) 31108 (100.0%)
Overweight and Obese
8462 (66.7%) 757 (6.0%) 2848 (22.4%) 623 (4.9%) 12690 (100.0%)
Total 32367 (73.9%) 1998 (4.6%) 7856 (17.9%) 1577 (3.6%) 43798 (100.0%)
43
Parental Legal Status
Hₒ7b: There is no association between childhood obesity and parental legal status.
REJECTED (p value = .000)
Derived: Legal Marital Status of Child's Parent(s) in the Household
Married Separated Divorced WidowedNever
Married
No Parents in
HouseholdTotal
Underweight and Healthy Weight
23905 (76.8%)
708 (2.3%)
3146 (10.1%)
442 (1.4%)
1961 (6.3%)
954 (3.1%)
31116 (100.0%)
Overweight and Obese
8462 (66.7%)
449 (3.5%)
1514 (11.9%)
255 (2.0%)
1391 (11.0%)
623 (4.9%)
12694 (100.0%)
Total 32367 (73.9%)
1157 (2.6%)
4660 (10.6%)
697 (1.6%)
3352 (7.7%)
1577 (3.6%)
43810 (100.0%)
44
Family Structure
Hₒ7c: There is no association between childhood obesity and family structure.
REJECTED (p value = .000)
Type of family structure in household
Two parent, biological or
adopted
Two parent, step family
Single mother, no father present
Other family type
Total
Underweight and Healthy Weight
20872 (67.0%) 3299 (10.6%) 4829 (15.5%) 2148 (6.9%) 31148 (100.0%)
Overweight and Obese
7234 (56.9%) 1473 (11.6%) 2851 (22.4%) 1156 (9.1%) 12714 (100.0%)
Total 28106 (64.1%) 4772 (10.9%) 7680 (17.5%) 3304 (7.5%) 43862 (100.0%)
45
Number of Siblings
Hₒ8a: There is no association between childhood obesity and number of siblings.
ACCEPTED (p value = .174)
How many people less than 18 years old live in this household
Children in
Household1 2 3 4 Total
Underweight
and Healthy
Weight
14095
(45.0%)
11305
(36.1%)
4106 (13.1%) 1800 (5.7%) 31306
(100.0%)
Overweight
and Obese
5900 (46.1%) 4505 (35.2%) 1645 (12.9%) 744 (5.8%) 12794
(100.0%)
Total 19995 15810 5751 2544 44100
46
Birth position of Siblings
Hₒ8b: There is no association between childhood obesity and birth position of siblings.
REJECTED (p value = .000)
Birth position of the child relative to other children in the household
Birth
Position1 2 3 4 5 Total
Underweigh
t and
Healthy
Weight
14095
(45.0%)
10314
(32.9%)
5916
(18.9%)
865 (2.8%) 116 (.4%) 31306
(100.0%)
Overweight
and Obese
5900
(46.1%)
3842
(30.0%)
2612
(20.4%)
364 (2.8%) 76 (.6%) 12794
(100.0%)
Total 19995 14156 8528 1229 192 44100
47
Family Meals
Hₒ9a: There is no association between childhood obesity and number of family meals.
REJECTED (p value = .000)
In the past week, on how many days did all family members living in the household eat a meal together?
Days per week 0 1 to 4 5 to 7 Total
Underweight and Healthy Weight
1483 (4.8%) 12181 (39.0%) 17551 (56.2%) 31215 (100.0%)
Overweight and Obese
616 (4.8%) 4656 (36.5%) 7490 (58.7%) 12762 (100.0%)
Total 2099 (4.8%) 16837 (38.3%) 25041 (56.9%) 43977 (100.0%)
48
Neighborhood Parks and Walking Paths
Hₒ10a: There is no association between childhood obesity and the presence of neighborhood parks and walking paths.
ACCEPTED (p value = .459)
Does a park or playground area exist in your neighborhood?
No Yes Total
Underweight and
Healthy Weight
6388 (20.6%) 24652 (79.4%) 31040 (100.0%)
Overweight and Obese 2569 (20.3%) 10108 (79.7%) 12677 (100.0%)
Total 8957 34760 43717
49
Presence of Sidewalks and Walking Paths
Hₒ10b: There is no association between childhood obesity and the presence of walking paths.
ACCEPTED (p value = .472)
Do sidewalks or walking paths exist in your neighborhood?
No Yes Total
Underweight and
Healthy Weight
8876 (28.6%) 22172 (71.4%) 31048 (100.0%)
Overweight and Obese 3579 (28.2%) 9092 (71.8%) 12671 (100.0%)
Total 12455 31264 43719
50
Neighborhood Safety
Hₒ10c: There is no association between childhood obesity and neighborhood safety.
ACCEPTED (p value = .229)
How often does your child feel safe in your community or neighborhood?
Never Sometimes Usually Always Total
Underweight
and Healthy
Weight
569 (1.8%) 2734 (8.8%) 10587 (34.2%) 17098 (55.2%) 30988
(100.0%)
Overweight
and Obese
229 (1.8%) 1188 (9.4%) 4242 (33.5%) 6985 (55.2%) 12644
(100.0%)
Total 798 3922 14829 24083 43632
51
Religious Service Attendance
Hₒ11a: There is no association between childhood obesity and religious service attendance.
ACCEPTED (p value = .081)
About how often does the child attend a religious service?
None
At least once
per year but
less than
once per
month
At least
once per
month but
less than
once per
week
At least
once per
week but
less than
daily
Daily Total
Underweight
and Healthy
Weight
4850
(15.6%)
4094
(13.2%)
5886
(18.9%)
15947
(51.3%)
312 (1.0%) 31089
(100.0%)
Overweight
and Obese
1974
(15.5%)
1549
(12.2%)
2430
(19.1%)
6631
(52.2%)
125 (1.0%) 12709
(100.0%)
Total 6824 5643 8316 22578 437 43798
52
Parental Social Support
Hₒ11b: There is no association between childhood obesity and parental social support.
ACCEPTED (p value = .286)
Is there someone that you can turn to for day-to-day emotional help with parenthood/raising
children?
Definitely and
somewhat agree
Somewhat and
definitely disagreeTotal
Underweight and
Healthy Weight
28313 (92.1%) 2444 (7.9%) 30757 (100.0%)
Overweight and Obese 11505 (91.7%) 1035 (8.3%) 12540 (100.0%)
Total 39818 3479 43297
53
Parental Stress Coping Skills
Hₒ11c: There is no association between childhood obesity and parental stress coping skills.
ACCEPTED (p value = .744)
In general, how well do you feel you are coping with the day to day demands of
parenthood/raising children?
Very well and
somewhat well
Not very well and not
very well at allTotal
Underweight and
Healthy Weight
30739 (98.5%) 479 (1.5%) 31218 (100.0%)
Overweight and Obese 12547 (98.4%) 201 (1.6%) 12748 (100.0%)
Total 43286 680 43966
54
Parent-Child Relationship Status
Hₒ11d: There is no association between childhood obesity and parent-child relationship status.
ACCEPTED (p value = .202)
How well can you and your child share ideas or talk about things that really matter?
Very well and
somewhat well
Not very well and not
very well at allTotal
Underweight and
Healthy Weight
21289 (97.5%) 550 (2.5%) 21839 (100.0%)
Overweight and Obese 8732 (97.2%) 249 (2.8%) 8981 (100.0%)
Total 30021 799 30820
55
Conclusions of NSCH Variables56
Not Addressed Needs Improvements Addressed
Conclusions
NSCH has room for growth
NSCH has a narrow scope of variables measured that are predictive childhood obesity risk.
10 out of 25 variables measured adequately
10 out of 25 variables notmeasured adequately
5 out of 25 variables need revisions
57
DISCUSSION
Strengths Large sample size
Randomized sample size
Large variety of topics
Limitations Random digit dialing
Self reported data
Bias?
Potential for non-response bias exists: the sample interviewed differed from the targeted child population in a systematic fashion
Lack of continuous data for all age groups
58
RECOMMENDATIONS for Changes to NSCH
Alternate selection method Eliminate SLAITS as selection method
Adding cell phones
Increase variability of sample by over-sampling minorities Hispanic/African American populations
Low income
Housing type
Education Level
All data for all ages Breastfeeding/Age of Weaning
59
QUESTIONS?60
References
6. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Promoting and Supporting breastfeeding. (2009) JADA, 1926-
42.
84. Stettler N, Zemel BS, Kumanyika S and Stallings VA. (2002) Infant weight gain and childhood overweight
status in a multicenter cohort study. Pediatrics, 109: 194-9.
85. Sloan S, Gildea A, Stewart M Sneddon H and Iwaniec D. (2007) Early weaning is related to weight and rate of
weight gain in infancy. Child: Care, Health and Development, 34(1): 59-64.
86. Dennison BA, Edmunds LS, Stratton HH, and Pruzek RM. (2006) Rapid weight gain predicts childhood
obesity. Obesity, 14(3): 491-99.
87. Ong KK, Ahmed ML, Emmet PM, Dunger DB and ALSPAC study team. (2000) Association between postnatal
catch-up growth and obesity in childhood: a prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal, 320: 967-71.
88. Mehta KC, Specker BL, Batholmey S, Giddens J and Ho M. (1998) Trial on timing of introduction to solids and
food type on infant growth. Pediatrics, 102: 569-73.
90. Manios Y, Moschonis G, Grammatikaki E, Anastasiadou A and Liarigkovinos T. (2010) Determinants of
childhood obesity and association with maternal perceptions of their children’s weight status: the GENESIS
study. J Am Diet Assoc, 110: 1527-31.
91. Ounsted M and Sleigh G. (1975) The infant’s self-regulation of food intake and weight gain. Difference in
metabolic balance after growth constraint or acceleration in utero. Lancet, 7922: 1393-97.
100. Dewey KG. (2001) Nutrition, growth and complementary feeding of breastfed infant. Pediatr Clin North Am,
48: 87-104.
61
References
10. Von Kries R, Koletzko B, Sauerwald T, Von Mutius E, Barnert D. (2003) Breastfeeding and obesity: cross
sectional study. BMJ, 319, 147-50.
11. Hedinger ML, Overpeck MD, Kuczmarski RJ, Ruan WJ. (2001) Association between infant breastfeeding and
overweight in young children. JAMA, 285, 2461-506.
12. Moreira P, Padez C, Mourao-Carvalhal R, Rosado V. (2007) Maternal weight gain during pregnancy and
overweight in Portuguese children. International Journal of Obesity, 31, 608-14.
13. Fawzi WW, Forman MR, Levy A, Graubard BI, Naggan L, Berendes HW. (1997) Maternal anthropometry and
infant feeding practices in Israel in relation to growth in infancy: North African Infant Feeding study. Am J
Clin Nutr, 65, 1731-37.
96. Barker DJ. (2007) The origins of the developmental origins theory. J Intern Med, 261: 412-17.
98. Ravelli GP, Stein ZA, and Susser MW. (1976) Obesity in young men after famine exposure in utero and early
infancy. New England J of Med, 295: 349-53.
99. Hales CN and Barker DJ. (2001) The Thrifty Phenotype hypothesis. Br Med Bull, 60: 5-20.
49. Shatenstein B and Ghadirian P. (1997) Influences on diet, health behaviours and their outcomes in select
ethnoclutural and religious groups. Nutrition, 14: 223-30.
48. Hummer RA, Rogers RG, Nam CB, and Elison CG. (1999) Religious involvement and U.S adult mortality.
Demography, 36: 273-85.
46. Kim KH, Sobal J and Wethington E. (2003) Religion and Body weight. International Journal of Obesity, 27:
469-77.
62
References
59. Lajunen HR, Kaprio J, Keski-Rahkonen A, Rose RJ, Kulkkinen L, Rissanen A, et al. (2009) Genetic and environmental effects on body mass index during adolescence: a prospective study among Finnish twins. Int J Obes, 33: 559-67.
57. Keskitalo K, Silventoinen K, Tuorila H, Perola M, Pietilainen KH, Rissanene A, et al. (2008) Genetic and environmental contribution to food use patterns of young adult twins. Physiol Behav, 93: 235-42.
52. Silventoinen K, Rokholm B, Kaprio J and Sorensen TIA. (2010) The genetic and environmental influences on childhood obesity: a systematic review of twin and adoption studies. International Journal of Obesity, 34: 29-40.
50. Keller KL, Pietrobelli A, Johnson SL and Faith MS. (2006) Maternal restriction of children’s eating and encouragements to eat as the ‘non-shared environment’: a pilot study using the child feeding questionnaire. International Journal of Obesity, 30: 1670-75.
60. Magnus O, Irgens LM, Haug K Mystad W, Skjaerven R and Stoltenberg C. (2006) Cohort Profile: the Norwegian Mother and child cohort study. Int J Epidemiol, 35: 1146-1150.
61. Ystrom E, Nielgel S, Knut-Inge K and Vollrath ME. (2008) The impact of maternal negative affectivity and general self-efficacy on breastfeeding: the Norwegian Mother and child cohort study. J Pediatr, 152: 68-78.
62. Ystrom E, Nielgel S, Knut-Inge K and Vollrath ME. (2005) The impact of maternal negative affectivity on dietary patterns of 18-month-ol children in the Norwegian mother and child cohort study. MaternChild Nutr, 5: 234-42.
63. Kroke A, Strathmann S and Gunther ALB. (2006) Maternal perceptions of her child’s body weight in infancy and early childhood and their relation to body weight status at age 7. Eur J Pediatr, 165: 875-83.
63
References
64. Francis LA, Hofer SM and Birch LL (2001) Predictors of maternal child-feeding style: maternal and child characteristics. Appetite, 37: 231-43.
68. Birch LL, Fisher JO, and Davison KK. (2003) Learning to overeat: maternal use of restrictive feeding practices promotes girls’ eating in the absence of hunger. Am J Clin Nutr, 78: 215-20.
70. Lindsay AC, Sussner KM, Greaney ML, and Peterson KE. (2011) Latina mothers’ beliefs and practices related to weight status, feeding and the development of child overweight. Public Health Nursing, 28(2): 107-18.
72. Boyington JA, and Johnson AA. (2004) Maternal perception of body size as a determinant of infant adiposity in an African-American community. J Natl Med Assoc, 96: 351-62.
73. Kuang JS, Becerra K, Oda T, Walker E, Xu R, Donohue M, et al. (2007) Parental ability to discriminate the weight status of children: results of a survey. Pediatrics, 120: 112-19.
82. Baughcum AE, Chamberlin LA, Deeks CM, Powers SW and Whitaker RC. (2000) Maternal perceptions of overweight preschool children. Pediatrics, 106: 1380-86.
120. Galvez MP, Pearl M, and Yen IH. Childhood obesity and the Built Environment: A Review of the Literature from 2008-2009. Curr Opin Pediatr, April 2010; 22(2) 202-07.
121. Veugelers P, Sithole F, Zhang S, et al. Neighborhood characteristics in relation to diet, physical activity and overweight of Canadian children. Int J Pediatr Obes, 2008(3); 152-159.
125. Santos MP, Page AS, Cooper AR, et al. Perceptions of the built environment in relation to physical activity in Protuguese adolescents. Health Place, 2009 (15); 548-52.
127. Babey SH, Hastert TA, Yu H, et al. Physcial activity among adolescents. When do parks matter? Am J Prev Med, 2008(34); 345-48.
129. Tester J, Baker R. Making the playfields even: Evaluating the impact of an environmental intervention on park use and physical activity. Prev Med, 2009 (48); 316-20.
64
References
43. Williams DR and Sternthal MJ. (2007) Spirituality, religion and health; evidence and research directions.
MJA, 186(10): S47-50.
41. Koenig HG, Jays JC, George LK, Blazer DG, Larson DB, and Lanerman LF. (1997) Modeling the cross-sectional
relationships between religious, physical health, social support and depressive symptoms. Am J Geriatr
Psychiatry, 5: 131-44.
17. Anderson PM, Butcher KF, Levine PB (2003). Economic Perspectives on Childhood Obesity. Federal
Reserve Bank of Chicago.
3. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Lamb MM, Flegal KM. (2010) Prevalence of High body mass index
in US children and adolescents, 2007-2008. JAMA, 303, 235-275.
65