The State Is Too Dangerous to Tolerate

13
The State Is Too Dangerous to Tolerate Robert Higgs

description

The State Is Too Dangerous to Tolerate. Robert Higgs. Background Reference. Robert Higgs, If Men Were Angels: The Basic Analytics of the State versus Self-government. Journal of Libertarian Studies 21 (Winter 2007): 55-68. “Anarchy” according to the Random House Dictionary. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The State Is Too Dangerous to Tolerate

Page 1: The State Is Too Dangerous  to Tolerate

The State Is Too Dangerous to Tolerate

Robert Higgs

Page 2: The State Is Too Dangerous  to Tolerate

Background Reference

• Robert Higgs, If Men Were Angels: The Basic Analytics of the State versus Self-government. Journal of Libertarian Studies 21 (Winter 2007): 55-68.

Page 3: The State Is Too Dangerous  to Tolerate

“Anarchy” according to the Random House Dictionary

• 1. a state of society without government or law• 2. political and social disorder due to absence of

governmental control.• 3. a theory that regards the absence of all direct

or coercive government as a political ideal and that proposes the cooperative and voluntary association of individuals and groups as the principal mode of organized society.

• 4. confusion; chaos; disorder.

Page 4: The State Is Too Dangerous  to Tolerate

James Madison, Federalist 51

• If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.

Page 5: The State Is Too Dangerous  to Tolerate

Madison’s Model

• No State State

• Men are angels OK OK

• Men are not angels Inconceivable Best• conceivable

Page 6: The State Is Too Dangerous  to Tolerate

More Realistic Model

• No State State• • Men are angels OK OK• • Men are not angels Bad situation Worse situation

Page 7: The State Is Too Dangerous  to Tolerate

Dresden, February 1945

Page 8: The State Is Too Dangerous  to Tolerate

Bergen-Belsen, April 1945

Page 9: The State Is Too Dangerous  to Tolerate

Auschwitz Survivors, 1945

Page 10: The State Is Too Dangerous  to Tolerate

Hiroshima, August 1945

Page 11: The State Is Too Dangerous  to Tolerate

Fallujah, November 2004

Page 12: The State Is Too Dangerous  to Tolerate

Critical point

• Defending the continued existence of the state, despite having absolute certainty of a corresponding continuation of its intrinsic engagement in extortion, robbery, willful destruction of wealth, assault, kidnapping, murder, and countless other crimes, requires that one imagine nonstate chaos, disorder, and death on a scale that nonstate actors seem incapable of causing.

Page 13: The State Is Too Dangerous  to Tolerate

Nuclear Bomb Explosion