The second LDB flight of BOOMERanG was devoted to CMB polarization measurements Was motivated by the...
-
Upload
alejandro-parrish -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of The second LDB flight of BOOMERanG was devoted to CMB polarization measurements Was motivated by the...
![Page 1: The second LDB flight of BOOMERanG was devoted to CMB polarization measurements Was motivated by the desire to measure polarization : –at 145 GHz (higher.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55147247550346414e8b613f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
• The second LDB flight of BOOMERanG was devoted to CMB polarization measurements
• Was motivated by the desire to measure polarization :– at 145 GHz (higher wrt WMAP, DASI, CBI etc.) – with bolometers (vs. coherent amplifiers of WMAP,
DASI, CBI etc.)– controlling the dominant foreground (dust) by
means of simultaneous observations at higher frequencies (245, 345 GHz)
– in one of the best sky regions (foreground-wise)– in a multipoles range where the polarization signal
can be higher than the foreground signal.
![Page 2: The second LDB flight of BOOMERanG was devoted to CMB polarization measurements Was motivated by the desire to measure polarization : –at 145 GHz (higher.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55147247550346414e8b613f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Universita’ di Roma, La Sapienza:P. de Bernardis, G. De Troia, A. Iacoangeli, S. Masi, A. Melchiorri, L. Nati, F. Nati, F. Piacentini, G. Polenta, S. Ricciardi, P. Santini, M. VenezianiCase Western Reserve University: J. Ruhl, T. Kisner, E. Torbet, T. MontroyCaltech/JPL: A. Lange, J. Bock, W. Jones, V. HristovUniversity of Toronto: B. Netterfield, C. MacTavish, E. Pascale
Cardiff University: P. Ade, P. Mauskopf IFAC-CNR: A. BoscaleriINGV: G. Romeo, G. di StefanoIPAC: B. Crill, E. HivonCITA: D. Bond, S. Prunet, D. Pogosyan LBNL, UC Berkeley: J. BorrillImperial College: A. Jaffe, C. ContaldiU. Penn.: M. Tegmark, A. de Oliveira-CostaUniversita’ di Roma, Tor Vergata: N. Vittorio, G. de Gasperis, P. Natoli, P. Cabella
BOOMERanG-03
![Page 3: The second LDB flight of BOOMERanG was devoted to CMB polarization measurements Was motivated by the desire to measure polarization : –at 145 GHz (higher.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55147247550346414e8b613f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The Polarization-sensitive BOOMERanG: B03
• Distribution of the PSBs in the focal plane :
• 8 pixels in the focal plane, separated by 30’.
• Masi et al. 2005 astro-ph/0507509
![Page 4: The second LDB flight of BOOMERanG was devoted to CMB polarization measurements Was motivated by the desire to measure polarization : –at 145 GHz (higher.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55147247550346414e8b613f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• The focal plane : all you see is cooled at 270 mK1
0 cm
![Page 5: The second LDB flight of BOOMERanG was devoted to CMB polarization measurements Was motivated by the desire to measure polarization : –at 145 GHz (higher.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55147247550346414e8b613f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Sun Shield
Ground Shield
Solar Array
Cryostat and
detectors
Primary Mirror
(1.3m)
Differential GPS Array
Star Camera
the BOOMERanG balloon-borne telescope
B03 Sensitive at 145, 245, 345 GHz
![Page 6: The second LDB flight of BOOMERanG was devoted to CMB polarization measurements Was motivated by the desire to measure polarization : –at 145 GHz (higher.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55147247550346414e8b613f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
BOOMERanG
• Is a microwave telescope (90-410 GHz)• with sensitive bolometric receivers (10’ resolution)• scanning the sky from the Antarctic stratosphere.
![Page 7: The second LDB flight of BOOMERanG was devoted to CMB polarization measurements Was motivated by the desire to measure polarization : –at 145 GHz (higher.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55147247550346414e8b613f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
06/01/2003
![Page 8: The second LDB flight of BOOMERanG was devoted to CMB polarization measurements Was motivated by the desire to measure polarization : –at 145 GHz (higher.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55147247550346414e8b613f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
[Masi et al. 2005]
145 GHz T map
(Masi et al., 2005)
the deepestCMB map ever
![Page 9: The second LDB flight of BOOMERanG was devoted to CMB polarization measurements Was motivated by the desire to measure polarization : –at 145 GHz (higher.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55147247550346414e8b613f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
• In the deep survey the S/N is high.
• The fluctuations are gaussian. Trms = (90.2+2.3) K
M1,M2 = first and second halves of the observations of the deep region. sum=(M1+ M2)/2diff =(M1- M2)/2
![Page 10: The second LDB flight of BOOMERanG was devoted to CMB polarization measurements Was motivated by the desire to measure polarization : –at 145 GHz (higher.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55147247550346414e8b613f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
• Detection of anisotropy signals all the way up to l=1500• Time and detector jacknife tests OK• Systematic effects negligible wrt noise & cosmic variance
B03 TT Power Spectrum
Jones et al. 2005
![Page 11: The second LDB flight of BOOMERanG was devoted to CMB polarization measurements Was motivated by the desire to measure polarization : –at 145 GHz (higher.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55147247550346414e8b613f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
• The use of fast estimators (FASTER, Hivon et al; XFASTER Contaldi et al.) allow us to carry out a very detailed analysis of how possible systematic effects propagate to the spectrum.
• The short summary is that all systematics we have considered are negligible wrt the effect of noise.
B03 TT Power Spectrum
[Jones et al. 2005]Jones et al. 2005
![Page 12: The second LDB flight of BOOMERanG was devoted to CMB polarization measurements Was motivated by the desire to measure polarization : –at 145 GHz (higher.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55147247550346414e8b613f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
TE Power Spectrum
Piacentini et al. 2005
• Smaller signal, but detection evident (3.5)
• NA and IT results consistent
• Error bars dominated by cosmic variance
• Time and detectors jacknife OK, i.e. systematics negligible
• Data consistent with TT best fit model
![Page 13: The second LDB flight of BOOMERanG was devoted to CMB polarization measurements Was motivated by the desire to measure polarization : –at 145 GHz (higher.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55147247550346414e8b613f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
EE Power Spectrum
Montroy et al. 2005
• Signal extremely small, but detection evident for EE (non zero at 4.8).
• No detection for BB nor for EB
• Time and detectors jacknife OK, i.e. systematics negligible
• Data consistent with TT best fit model
• Error bars dominated by detector noise.
![Page 14: The second LDB flight of BOOMERanG was devoted to CMB polarization measurements Was motivated by the desire to measure polarization : –at 145 GHz (higher.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55147247550346414e8b613f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
EE Power Spectrum
Montroy et al. 2005
• Time and detectors jacknife OK, i.e. systematics negligible
• Data consistent with TT best fit model
• and with other experiments: