The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

33
The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer Peter Beyersdorf, Seiji Kawamura, Fumiko K awazoe, Kentaro Somiya National Astronomical Observatory of Japan Marcel Aguerros University of Washington LIGO DCC# G040047-00-Z

description

The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer. Peter Beyersdorf, Seiji Kawamura, Fumiko Kawazoe, Kentaro Somiya National Astronomical Observatory of Japan Marcel Aguerros University of Washington. LIGO DCC# G040047-00-Z. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Page 1: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter Beyersdorf, Seiji Kawamura, Fumiko Kawazoe, Kentaro SomiyaNational Astronomical Observatory of Japan

Marcel AguerrosUniversity of Washington LIGO DCC# G040047-00-Z

Page 2: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 3

Polarization RSE is a frequency tunable (RSE) interferometer configuration that uses the control and readout schemes of first generation (non-RSE) detectors.

Why is this important? How does it work? Results from the prototype Conclusion

Page 3: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 4

Motivation

Resonant Sideband Extraction (RSE) will be used in second generation detectors Reduces thermal load on the beamsplitter Allows frequency tuning of the interferometer Can beat the standard quantum limit at certain frequencies

Control schemes and signal readout used with 1st generation detectors are inadequate for conventional RSE configurations. More cross-coupling of length degrees of freedom in RSE configurations Modified control schemes use extra RF sidebands which greatly increase det

ector bandwidth requirements Imbalance of RF sidebands in detuned configurations make RF readout susc

eptible to excess technical noise (although may allow reduction in quantum noise)

detuning requires reoptimizing demodulation phases Goal: create and demonstrate a frequency tunable (RSE) configuration

compatible with the readout and control schemes of first generation detectors.

Page 4: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 6

Challenges of (other) RSE configurations RSE requires 5 lengths to be co

ntrolled vs 4 for 1st generation detectors. Complicates lock acquisition: req

uiring several intermediate steps with the parameters of the control scheme reoptimized at each step

Degrades the control matrix: The control signals for the first 4 degrees of freedom have a sensitivity to the additional 5th degree of freedom

This requires an extra modulation frequency, and greatly increases bandwidth requirements for the photodetector

SEM

PRM BSLASER

l+

Ly

Lx

ls

l-

Page 5: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 7

Challenges of (previous) RSE configurations Sideband imbalance at dark port

Allows noise from phase modulation to couple to the output signal

excess carrier light produces only harmless phase noise

excess carrier light produces amplitude noise because of sideband imbalance

Detuned configurationNon-RSE or broadband

RSE configuration

Input spectrum:Carrier with phase modulated RF sidebands

Transmission of signal extraction cavity to dark port

Spectrum at dark port:

Page 6: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 8

Addressing the challenges of RSE Conventional RSE

Various control schemes have been developed and tested on table-top experiments

Development of high-power, high-frequency photodetectors for RSE is proceeding

DC readout to avoid excess noise in RF readout has been proposed

various tuning mechanism that can tune the interferometer to a discrete set of frequencies have been shown

Polarization RSE

Page 7: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 9

Polarization RSE interferometer

RM PBS arm cavity

arm cavity

LASER

IOC

VWP ➊ ➌

➊ ➋ ➌ ➍

The light in the arms is split by polarization.

All of the light (power and signal) exits the polarizing beam splitter through the same port.

A differential signal causes a change in the polarization state of the output light

The output power is in the “bright polarization” the output signal is in the “dark polarization”

A single recycling mirror recycles both the power and the signal

A variable waveplate in the recycling cavity shifts the resonant frequency for the signal relative to the power.

An off-axis input-output coupler provides polarization-dependant coupling to the recycling cavity so the power and signal cavity finesse can be different

RSE is realized in an interferometer with only 4 degrees of freedom

Page 8: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 13

Polarization RSE length sensing signals are analogous to those of a (non-RSE) power-recycled Fabry-Perot Michelson interferometer

A control scheme analogous to that of TAMA300 can be used

Length sensing

kLr

r

ret

etit

nm

nm

sIOCi

pIOC

ipIOCsIOC

1

1

1 2,

22,

2,,

0

2,

22,

2,,

11 sIOC

ipIOC

ipIOCsIOC

ret

etit

kLr

r

r

i

r nm

nm

sIOCsIOC 1

112

,2

,0

2,

2,

1

1

sIOCsIOC r

i

r

carr

ier

1st o

rder

side

band

s

dark polarization bright polarizationPolarization RSE field amplitudes

kL

r

r

r

itE

nm

nm

PRM

PRM

1

1

1 20

sin1

1cos

1 221

PRM

PRM

PRM

PRM

r

iit

r

itE

ΦkL

r

r

r

trE

nm

nm

PRM

PRMPRM 1

1

1 2

2

0

sin

1cos

1

12

2

2

2

1

PRM

PRM

PRM

PRMPRM

r

t

r

itrE

carr

ier

1st o

rder

side

band

s

dark port bright portTAMA300 field amplitudes

Page 9: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 14

Length sensing

VWP

dL+

Q

dL-

dL+

dl-

Qrf

Qrf

dL-

Irf

dL+

rf

dl+

Qrf

dl-

TAMA300 polarization RSE

Signal detection ports are analogous to those of first generation detectors

dl+

rf

Irf

dL+

Page 10: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 15

Theoretical response (to GWs)

Calculate the gravitational wave response from the product of

Carrier build in arms

Conversion from carrier to sidebands by a GW

Buildup of sidebands from arms in recycling cavity

Response is that of RSE

EarmERCE0

Earm,sERC,s

Es,1()

cav

s

E

E 1,

1

0

0/sin1 /02

C

BecLrir cLi

nmIOCPRSE

nmkLi

nmnm

iklkLi

nm

nm

re

tree

r

tC

0

00

/2

2/2/2

2

1

1

/22

2,

01

kLi

nm

nmnmsIOC e

r

trt

1

2,

211

pIOC

i

nm

ter

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

norm

aliz

ed r

espo

nse

(dB)

10-1 100 101 102 103 104

f requency (Hz)

(optical spring effect ignored)

Page 11: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 16

Theoretical response (to noise)

Investigate the static response with imperfect polarizing optics to determine if they can couple noise to the output port one round trip in the interferometer recycling cavity is described by

for deviation of parameters (wave plate angles, birefringence, etc.) about their nominal values, the resulting spurious signal has only 1 first order dependence, which is a static quantity

Noise due to polarizing optics seems manageable

2212

2111

RTRT

RTRT

3359.57.15.014 ,,21 VWPsPRBpPBSVWPHWPHWPHWP AART

birefringence of half waveplate

angular misalignment of waveplates

leakage of s,p polarizationsthrough the polarizing beamsplitter

Page 12: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 17

Unique aspects of the polarization RSE operation

The use of an orthogonally polarized local oscillator for generating control signals

Control of a Michelson without asymmetry not necessary, but can reduce coupling of laser

frequency noise to signal Differential tuning of a birefringent cavity Creating polarization sensitive finesse for a linear

cavity

Page 13: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 18

Balanced detection with an orthogonally polarized local oscillator

EEsigsig+E+Elolo

EEsigsig-E-Elolo

2E2EsigsigEElo lo cos(cos(sigsig--lolo))

Polarizing Polarizing beam splitterbeam splitter

EElolo

EEsigsig

Page 14: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 19

Control of a Michelson without asymmetry

'dark port power' 'l- error signal'

VWP

PBS(1)

(3)

(4)

dL+

Q

(2)dL-

rf

dl+

dl-

Qrf

l-

bright polarization

Michelson signal indark polarization

Local oscillator inbright polarization

Page 15: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 20

Differential tuning of a birefringent cavity

VWP

As the birefringence of this waveplate is varied, the transmission spectra for the two

polarization states become detuned

darkpolarization

bright polarization

Transmission spectrum of recycling cavity showing both polarization states

Page 16: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 21

Creating polarization sensitive finesse for a linear cavity.

5

4

3

2

1

0

-8 -6 -4 -2 0x10

-3

p-polarization s-polarization

Transmission spectra of linear cavity with a window IO coupler

A non-normal incident window provides different coupling for the s and p polarization into the recycling cavity

Page 17: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 23

Putting it all together – the PRSE experiment

RM

IOC

Aux. laser

x-arm

y-arm

Ly PD

rec.

cav

. m

onito

r P

D

x-arm monitor PD

y-arm monitor PD

Lx PD

L+ PD

L- PDl- PD

l+ PD

phase locking PD

Optical spectrum analyzer

polarizing beamsplitter

Faraday isolator

mirror

partially transmissive mirror

laser

phase modulator

photodetector

piezo mounted mirror

lens

half waveplate

quarter waveplate

variable waveplate

Page 18: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 24

Lock acquisition – dl+

1. 0

0. 5

0. 0

403020100ti me (s)

y-arm cavity

1. 0

0. 5

0. 0

403020100

x-arm cavity

1. 0

0. 5

0. 0

403020100

recycling cavity

1. 0

0. 5

0. 0

powe

r (A

.U.)

403020100

dark polarization

R=98%

FI

LASER

EOM

This polarizing beamsplitter transmits the “bright polarization” containing common mode signals

1st order sidebands resonate in the recycling cavity, but not the arm cavities

2nd order sidebands resonate do not resonate in the recycling cavity

Demodulation at measures the phase shift of the 1st order sidebands due to the recycling cavity

Page 19: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 25

Lock acquisition – dl-

1. 0

0. 5

0. 0

403020100ti me (s)

y-arm cavity

1. 0

0. 5

0. 0

403020100

x-arm cavity

1. 0

0. 5

0. 0

403020100

recycling cavity

1. 0

0. 5

0. 0

powe

r (A

.U.)

403020100

dark polarization

IOC

FI

LASER

EOM

This polarizing beamsplitter reflects the “dark polarization” containing differential mode signals, and a bit of the (orthogonally polarized) 2nd order sidebands for use as a local oscillator

Differential motion of the Michelson arms couples power from the 1st order sidebands into the dark polarization

Demodulation at measures the presence of the 1st order sidebands due to the Michelson

2nd order sidebands resonate do not resonate in the recycling cavity

Page 20: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 26

Lock acquisition - dlx

1. 0

0. 5

0. 0

403020100ti me (s)

y-arm cavity

1. 0

0. 5

0. 0

403020100

x-arm cavity

1. 0

0. 5

0. 0

403020100

recycling cavity

1. 0

0. 5

0. 0

powe

r (A

.U.)

403020100

dark polarization

FI

LASER

EOM

R=50%

This polarizing beamsplitter reflects only the component of the light that was in the X-arm

A fraction of the input light is used to illuminate the arms through the opposite face of the main beamsplitter during lock acquisition

Demodulation at measures the phase shift of the carrier due to the arm cavity

The carrier resonates in the arm, the 1st order sideband does not

Page 21: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 27

Lock acquisition - dly

1. 0

0. 5

0. 0

403020100ti me (s)

y-arm cavity

1. 0

0. 5

0. 0

403020100

x-arm cavity

1. 0

0. 5

0. 0

403020100

recycling cavity

1. 0

0. 5

0. 0

powe

r (A

.U.)

403020100

dark polarization

FI

LASER

EOM

R=50%

This polarizing beamsplitter transmits only the component of the light that was in the Y-arm

A fraction of the input light is used to illuminate the arms through the opposite face of the main beamsplitter during lock acquisition

Demodulation at measures the phase shift of the carrier due to the arm cavity

The carrier resonates in the arm, the 1st order sideband does not

Page 22: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 28

Control Signals – dL-

Once lock is acquired the control of the cavities is switched to the dL- and dL+ signals

FI

LASER

EOM

A polarizing beamsplitter reflects the differential mode signals in the dark polarization and a bit of the bright polarization for use as a local oscillator

Differential motion of the arm cavities couples power from the carrier into the dark polarization

Demodulation at measures the carrier in the dark polarization, i.e. the GW signal

Page 23: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 29

Control Signals – dL+

FI

LASER

EOM

Common motion of the arms adds a phase shift to the carrier in the bright polarization

Demodulation at measures the phase of the carrier due to the common mode of the arm cavities relative to the 1st order sidebands

The light returning to the laser is the bright polarization and contains the common mode signal of the arm cavities.

Page 24: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 30

Control Signals

The control scheme is basically that of TAMA300

The Michelson interferometer does not need asymmetry Leaky polarizing beamsplitt

ers couple sidebands to the dark polarization detectors for use as a local oscillator

FI

LASER

EOM

IOC

Page 25: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 31

Lock acquisition order independence

1. 0

0. 5

0. 0

403020100ti me (s)

y-arm cavity

1. 0

0. 5

0. 0

403020100

x-arm cavity

1. 0

0. 5

0. 0

403020100

recycling cavity

1. 0

0. 5

0. 0

powe

r (A

.U.)

403020100

dark polarization1.0

0.5

0.0

403020100

dark polarization

1.0

0.5

0.0

403020100

y-arm cavity

1.0

0.5

0.0

403020100

recycling cavity

1.0

0.5

0.0

403020100

x-arm cavity

time (s)

power

(A

.U.)

One strength of the polarization RSE configuration is the clean separation of the control signals. That is evident by the fact that the arm cavities can be locked before or after the recycling cavity

Page 26: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 32

RSE transfer functions

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

Am

plit

ude

dB

403020100Frequency (MHz)

Response to injected laser at offset frequency

Auxiliary laser was offset frequency locked and injected into one arm cavity to simulate GW sidebands

The frequency response of the interferometer was mapped out for various detunings

The detuning was changed without disturbing lock

VWP

main LASER

Swept sin from network analyzer

BS

BSAux.

LASER

tonetworkanalyzer LPF

s o

os

Page 27: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 33

Balance of RF sidebands

Balanced RF sidebands are necessary for low-noise RF readout of the gravitational wave signal

Detuning produces an imbalance in the signal sidebands in the dark polarization

RF sidebands are unaffected by detuning used for signal readout (in the brigh

t polarization) are balanced regardless of the detuning

Demodulation phase does not need to be reoptimized after changing the detuning

-40 0 40

-40 0 40

-40 0 40

-40 0 40

-40 0 40

-40 0 40Frequency (MHz)

O

pti

cal s

pect

rum

analy

zer

VWP

main LASERo

Page 28: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 34

Discussion The polarization RSE configuration offers many advantages over o

ther RSE configurations Simple, familiar control scheme RF readout without excess noise Can operate without Shnupp asymmetry, reducing noise and contr

ol loop couplings Variable bandwidth and continuously tunable peak frequency witho

ut breaking lock The cost of these advantages is the use of polarizing optics

Tolerances need to be set for several parameters that can couple noise to the output

High quality polarizing optics need to be developed and characterized

Computer models for interferometer analysis need to be modified to be able to represent this configuration

Page 29: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 36

Summary

A TAMA300-like control scheme was used to control a polarization RSE interferometer

The frequency response is continuously adjustable Lock acquisition and control were robust and

unaffected by the frequency tuning RF readout can be implemented without introducing

excess noise Implementation will require extensive use of

polarizing optics, which haven’t been used in a gravitational wave detector before

Page 30: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 38

Quantum noise in polarization RSE

VWP

dL+

Q

dL-

dL+

dl-

Qrf

polarization RSE

Vacuum fluctuations that enter through the L- detection ports produce quantum noise

Optical spring effect is

dl+

rfVacuum

fluctuations

Vacuumfluctuations

Page 31: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 39

Page 32: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 40

Page 33: The polarization RSE tabletop interferometer

Peter BeyersdorfG040047-00-Z 41