The Pershing Cable (Nov 1979)

download The Pershing Cable (Nov 1979)

of 2

Transcript of The Pershing Cable (Nov 1979)

  • 8/17/2019 The Pershing Cable (Nov 1979)

    1/2

     the

    Pershing

    able

    56th Field Artillery Brigade

    Vol.

    1S,

    No.

    11

    Nov

    embe

    r

    197

    9

    llllppenJaa Ill e

    l/fbl,

    1

    /lla

    l, 1/NtllField

    Artlleriel

    /4~ Dfuuy

    Dragon: a

    super bad

    tank

    killer

    The

    Anny

    ca

    lls It the

    M-47

    Medium Artt\.

    Tank

    Weapon

    .

    Most

    folks

    know

    it

    as the

    Dra

    gon

    .

    Any

    soldier

    who s

    fired it

    calls it

    a

    S\qler.tlad

    tank

    -killer.

    Recently 25 Dragon gunners and assis t·

    ant gunners from Companies A and B. 2nd

    Battalion.

    4th

    Infantry, fired the weapon at

    the Hohenlel1 MaJor 'l'ralnlng Area. The

    soldiers

    put 18 trafning rounds

    down-rartKC

    as partol

    he.Ir p~l i f ica t ion

    raini

    ng

    .

    The

    weapon

    Is almost deceptivel> toy-

    like in appearance-

    just

    a

    big tube with

    a

    foam

    rubber cap on

    each

    end.

    Put

    the

    Dragon in the hands of a skilled

    ri

    r

  • 8/17/2019 The Pershing Cable (Nov 1979)

    2/2

    November 1979

    Pershing

    Cable

    The rmy is mo ernizing

    WASHINGTON

    I ARNEWS) -

    Much

    has

    been

    said

    and written about the Army

    ·s

    in

    tention to modernize the force fort

    he

    l980"s.

    But what Is this modemlzatlon ioing to In·

    clu

    rdinates.

    the

    abiht\'

    to get the maximum outof every indi

    '1dual

    and every piece or equipment 'ill become

    more and more important. This will be par-

    ticularly true in areas or reduced resources

    such asdollars and manpower."

    Because of reduced resources. the gener

    al-emphasized the Army will ha\'e to do a

    better job of supporting its recruit()rS and

    explaini

    ng

    lo the Army and the American

    people that we have fine young men and

    women in the Army. capable

    of

    per orminK

    our

    mi

    ss

    ions and objectives.

    "

    We must

    do

    a better job or explaining

    lhat there is a positive aspect of service in

    the military.·· he offered.

    ··

    we have to

    co

    n

    vince people. even those who believe in u

    draft. thatwedo have a Y lunteerAnny and

    we·re going to ha\'e to give it a chance to

    work. We have to take the steps necessary

    to get the quality and quanlit>· ol people we

    need

    inthe volunteer force.

    ··we have to accept

    the

    fact that ..-e ha\'e

    a volunteer Army. We need to do a

    be

    t ter jub

    ol

    explaining to the American publi

    c

    and

    10

    Its young men and women the opportun lt,~s

    the Army presents or service and personill

    deYelopmen1:· Meyer continued. ··1.n turn.

    we

    in

    the Army must provide that meani

    ng

    ful

    experience ror the young person

    wh

    o

    comesin. ' ·

    an anybody tell m what

    O

    is all about

    B)·

    SSgt.

    THOMAS

    REED

    BrigadeOENCO

    , Editors note :

    This

    is

    the

    first in a

    se

    -

    ries of anicles dealing withOrganizalional

    E Jecti1m~ss OEJ and what

    it

    mean to

    soldiers in todoy 'a Anny. T author is one

    o/

    90

    noncommiswned

    o ficers who

    are

    participants in the Army·s pi14t program

    of

    OE

    .

    The OENCO piklt program is being

    eooluated by the

    Anny

    Research Irutitute

    lo determine whether

    OENCOs

    will

    be

    -

    come

    an

    integral pan of

    the

    Army s OE

    program.,

    \\'hat thehell is OE?

    I have have been asked that question

    many

    timesby many people: my

    wife, my

    parents. friends. commanders. stl\ f ofli

    cers command sergeants major. In this

    series. I

    hope

    to answer hal question.

    In 1969, the results of the Army War

    Col

    le~c studies on leadership and profession

    alism. the Continental Army Command

    Leadership Board and a study of basic

    trainee motivation

    at

    f'ort Ord. Calif . con

    verged todevelopan awareness at Depart·

    ment of the Army tDAI level that the be-

    havioral sciences were not being used to

    their fullest potential in

    the

    Army.

    An

    additional

    DA

    study was performed

    dwing late 1971 and early 1m. which cul

    minated in the establishment or a number

    cl pilot projects. Ammg them was lhe in·

    stallation-wide implementation

    ol

    the Or

    ganizational Development (OD1 concept at

    fort Ord, Calif. The OD project

    slowly

    ex

    panded to include a training course for

    mid-level managers and

    ended

    with the es

    tablishment or the Organizational Effec

    tiveness Training Center in July t97S. cThe

    name has since been changed to the

    OE

    Center and

    School.

    What

    these studles

    showed

    was that

    se

    lected behavioral science and modern

    management tecmiques are applicable

    to

    the Army

    . These

    findings

    led to the intro

    dtiction and use ol

    OE

    on an Army-wide ba·

    sis.

    ,

    OE differs from tradltlonal Army ap

    proaches to management by including ad

    vanced management and behavioral sci

    ence techniques which have been

    collectiYely relerred to in the civilian sec

    tor

    as

    Organizational Development. While

    .

    OD

    has been used in civilian industry ror

    several years to solve many or the same

    organizational problems which face the

    Army. some ol the OD teem ques

    are

    not

    applicable loa military organizal.on.

    OD

    methods and skills which compli

    ment core Army values and leadership

    principles have been selectively adapted

    for

    use

    and are collectively referred to

    as

    Oqpnizalional Effectiveness.

    Thus the definition of

    that l use Is

    that

    it

    Is the application or selected

    ad,

    vanced minagemmt techniques and se

    lected behavioral science techniqes to a

    military orpnization.

    OE is what is called a

    ·

    ·total

    systems ap

    proach

    . In

    applying OE

    to

    a military or·

    pnization. one looks at

    both

    the ··people

    processes and the

    org11nizatlonal

    struc

    ture. the objective being to Improve the en

    tireorganization.

    This ls not to say that OE might not in

    clude individual management develop

    ment of skills, aUllun

    the

    org11nizalion·s behavior. struc

    ture or authority relationships, objectives

    and mission accomplishment.

    cNext month: a

    look

    at

    how

    can

    work

    with

    the unit commander and

    hi

    s sub:> rdi

    nates to improve his

    or

    her organization.

    ssci Thomas

    Reed