The Outcomes Of Intravitreal Bevacizumab Versus Combined Treatment In Patients With Diabetic Macular...
-
Upload
dr-jagannath-boramani -
Category
Healthcare
-
view
82 -
download
0
Transcript of The Outcomes Of Intravitreal Bevacizumab Versus Combined Treatment In Patients With Diabetic Macular...
THE OUTCOMES OF INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB
VERSUS COMBINED TREATMENT IN PATIENTS
WITH DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: A
COMPARATIVE STUDY
Dr. Shilpa. G
Fellow in Vitreo-retina
M.M. Joshi Eye Institute Hubli,
Karnataka, India
Dr. A.S. Guruprasad
Head of Vitreo-retina
Department
M.M. Joshi Eye Institute Hubli,
Karnataka, India
Dr. Shrinivas. M. Joshi
Consultant
Vitreo-retina Department
M. M. Joshi Eye Institute
Hubli, Karnataka, India
DR. TRIPTI KOLHATKARVitreo-Retina Consultant, M M Joshi Eye Institute
Token No: 0016
INTRODUCTION
• In diabetic macular edema focal/grid photocoagulation was considered a standard therapy(as per ETDRS), till anti-VEGF role was established.
•An anti-VEGF agent reduces the macular edema by decreasing vascular permeability. The effect however is short leading to need for repeated injections.
THE OUTCOMES OF INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB VERSUS COMBINED TREATMENT IN
PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Token No: 0016
• To study the anatomical and functional outcomes of bevacizumab monotherapy and combination therapy with Mild Macular Grid (MMG) laser in DME in NPDR patients and to compare the results between the two groups.
AIMS & OBJECTIVES
THE OUTCOMES OF INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB VERSUS COMBINED TREATMENT IN
PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Token No: 0016
THE OUTCOMES OF INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB VERSUS COMBINED TREATMENT IN
PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
MATERIALS & METHODS
• Study was carried out in Vitreo-Retina department of M M Joshi Eye Institute, Hubli, Karnataka, India
• 75 NPDR eyes having DME were divided into two Groups.
• Group 1: Received IVB only
• Group 2: Recieved IVB followed by MMG
• Group 2A: 1 IVB followed by MMG
• Group 2B: 3 IVB followed by MMG
• Follow up period was 9 months
Token No: 0016
OUTCOME MEASURES
Visual acuity and Central Macular Thickness at the end of 9 months of follow up
THE OUTCOMES OF INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB VERSUS COMBINED TREATMENT IN
PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Token No: 0016
RESULTS & OBSERVATIONS
Baseline Values
Groups No of Patients Baseline CMT Baseline VA
Group 1 26 444.34 0.98
Group 2A 25 379.72 0.82
Group 2B 24 411.02 1.03
THE OUTCOMES OF INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB VERSUS COMBINED TREATMENT IN
PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Token No: 0016
Baseline CMT Follow up 1
month
Follow up 9
month
444.34 286.08 283.65
379.72 258.44 263.2
411.02 243.96 242.79
Central Macular Thickness
Group 1 Group 2A Group 2B
Baseline VA Follow up 1
month
Follow up 9
month
0.98 0.37 0.46
0.820.38 0.41
1.030.26 0.26
Visual Acuity
Group 1 Group2A Group 2B
THE OUTCOMES OF INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB VERSUS COMBINED TREATMENT IN
PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Token No: 0016
THE OUTCOMES OF INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB VERSUS COMBINED TREATMENT IN
PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Token No: 0016
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS
•IVB followed by MMG provided cost effective statistically significant (p= <0.0001)
favorable results by decreasing the macular edema & improving the visual acuity for a
longer period of time.
•But the study needs to be conducted over a larger sample size for a longer duration of
time to confirm the results.
THE OUTCOMES OF INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB VERSUS COMBINED TREATMENT IN
PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Progression of cataract was seen with no
statistically significant difference among
the groups (p=0.774).
No other complications noted.
Token No: 0016
References
1.Chew EY, Klein ML, Ferris FL III, Remaley NA, Murphy RP, Chantry K, Hoogwerf BJ, Miller D ETDRS Research Group.
Association of elevated serum lipid levels with retinal hard exudates in diabetic retinopathy: Early Treatment Diabetic
Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Report No 22. Arch Ophthalmology 1996; 114:1079-1084
2.Akduman, L., & Olk, R. J. (1999). Subthreshold (invisible) modified grid diode laser photocoagulation in diffuse diabetic
macular edema (DDME). Ophthalmic Surg Lasers, 30(9), 706-714
3.Lee CM, Olk RJ. Modified Grid laser photocoagulation for diffuse diabetic macular edema: long term visual results.
Ophthalmology. 1991;98:1594-1602
4.Nguyen, Q. D., Shah, S. M., Heier, J. S., Do, D. V., Lim, J., Boyer, D., Abraham, P., & Campochiaro, P. A. (2009). Primary End
Point (Six Months) Results of the Ranibizumab for Edema of the mAcula in diabetes (READ-2) study. Ophthalmology,116(11),
2175-2181
5.Massin, P., Bandello, F., Garweg, J. G., Hansen, L. L., Harding, S. P., Larsen, M., Mitchell, P., Sharp, D., Wolf-Schnurrbusch, U.
E., Gekkieva, M., Weichselberger, A., & Wolf, S. (2010). Safety and efficacy of ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema
(RESOLVE Study): a 12-month, randomized, controlled, double-masked, multicenter phase II study. Diabetes Care, 33(11), 2399-
2405
6.Mitchell, P., Bandello, F., Schmidt-Erfurth, U., Lang, G. E., Massin, P., Schlingemann, R. O., Sutter, F., Simader, C., Burian, G.,
Gerstner, O., & Weichselberger, A. (2011). The RESTORE study: ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser
monotherapy for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology, 118(4), 615-625
7.Michaelides, M., Kaines, A., Hamilton, R. D., Fraser-Bell, S., Rajendram, R., Quhill, F., Boos, C. J., Xing, W., Egan, C., Peto,
T., Bunce, C., Leslie, R. D., & Hykin, P. G. (2010). A prospective randomized trial of intravitreal bevacizumab or laser therapy in
the management of diabetic macular edema (BOLT study) 12-month data: report 2. Ophthalmology, 117(6), 1078-1086
THE OUTCOMES OF INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB VERSUS COMBINED TREATMENT IN
PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Token No: 0016