The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

26
The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years B. Traub - Data Integration Standards PhUSE 2011

description

The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years. B. Traub - Data Integration Standards PhUSE 2011. Contents. Integrating clinical trial data Working with CROs Current operating model in Data Integration Standards Conclusion and experience. Legacy Nycomed. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

Page 1: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

B. Traub - Data Integration StandardsPhUSE 2011

Page 2: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

Contents

1. Integrating clinical trial data

2. Working with CROs

3. Current operating model in Data Integration Standards

4. Conclusion and experience

| B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |2

Page 3: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

Legacy Nycomed

• Focus area: Core expertise in gastroenterology, inflammatory, respiratory and pain

• Partnering was an essential part of the business model

• The pipeline was built from own research and through co-developments with partners.

• Effective from October 1st 2011, Nycomed is part of the Takeda group

3 | B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |

Page 4: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

Disclaimer

The shared content of this presentation is that of legacy Nycomed.

It does not reflect the R&D or CRO experience of legacy Takeda.

4 | B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |

Page 5: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

Contents

1. Integrating clinical trial data

2. Working with CROs

3. Current operating model in Data Integration Standards

4. Conclusion and experience

5 | B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |

Page 6: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

The data asset of Nycomed

• Clinical Trial data are an essential asset of Nycomed.

• Providing integrated data collected from Clinical Trials requires data

conversion and standardisation processes

• So far CDISC CDASH, SDTM and ADaM standards were adopted

• The data are stored and integrated in a Clinical Data Warehouse

(compliant to Nycomed QMS and GCP / ICH E6)

6 | B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |

Page 7: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

Data Integration team

| B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |7

Nycomed Data Standards– CDISC SDTM and ADaM

– Code lists

– Processes / rules

Data Exchange– Definition of standards and

management of data exchange

– Support data submissionsto regulatory authorities

CRO collaboration Planning of data standardisation

– Definition of deliverables and processes

– QC agreement and oversight

Data Integration

Standards team– Data Integration Manager (DIM)

– SAS programmer

– Data Warehouse Manager

Data Warehouse– Data integrity, comparability

– Controlled access to data

– Data security and compliance

Page 8: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

Our role in the Clinical Trial Team (CTT)

Data Science members / responsibilities:

•Data Manager: Data cleaning process and database set-up (to a large proportion)

•Biostatistician: Study specific statistical reporting and generation of analysis data bases

•Data Integration Manager: Data standardisation tasks

| B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |8

CTTLeader

LOC

Trial support

Data Science

CROs Medical Science

Drug Safety

Regulatory

Page 9: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

Trial data flow

| B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |9

Internal share

Clinical Database

AnalysisData

ORACLE Life Science Data Hub

SDTMData EntryData Cleaning

MappingDerivationrestructuring

Nycomed

TLGTLG SAS program

EDMS

Import / stagingCDASH

Clinical Data warehouse FACT

Page 10: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

Contents

1. Integrating clinical trial data

2. Working with CROs

3. Current operating model in Data Integration Standards

4. Conclusion and experience

10 | B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |

Page 11: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

Outsourcing at legacy Nycomed

• Basis• High level outsourcing of non-strategic activities

• lean R&D and CRO oversight model with strategic partnerships

• The CRO is accountable to• Provide deliverables according to agreement

• Work according to GCP and CSV principles

• Nycomed is accountable for • Compliance to regulatory requirements

• Oversight of the CRO to ensure quality in regards to task conducted for Nycomed

| B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |11

Page 12: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

Outsourcing at legacy Nycomed cont.

Most of Data Science tasks are completely contracted out .

That requires:

• Strong partnership with CRO• Building expertise on both sides (CDISC, requirements of regulatory

authorities, …)• Nycomed to specify user requirements and to define clear sponsor

standards • Clear QC concept including definition of quality levels to be met

Since Nycomed is accountable for the compliance of the deliverables in regards to GCP and CSV, the CRO processes must fit to the according requirements

| B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |12

Page 13: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

Understanding CRO processes

Basic assumption at legacy Nycomed•The sponsor has the ultimate accountability for all outsourced processes •The CRO works according to his processes and rules

The sponsor needs to know how the CROs worksThe sponsor must ensure that all processes are covered by SOPs The sponsor must ensure that the CRO SOPs do not contradict own

standards

13 | B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |

Page 14: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

SAS programming

Creation of SDTM and ADaM datasets is basically a SAS programming task!

What does that mean?

• Nycomed adopted the V-model for computerised systems validation (CSV)

• Since a SAS program is a small Computer System we require that• CSV principles will be applied and thus• software development lifecycle documentation (SDLC) will be created

for the validation of SAS programs

14 | B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |

Page 15: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

SAS programming: SDTM / ADaM datasets

SpecificationaCRF mappingSDTMADaM

SpecificationaCRF mappingSDTMADaM

QualificationModel complianceDerivation rules……

QualificationModel complianceDerivation rules……

SAS programming

SAS programming

CROGCP compliant SAS environmentCRO SOP controlled

CROGCP compliant SAS environmentCRO SOP controlled

Review bySponsor

CRO responsibility,no interventionby Sponsor

15 | B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |

Page 16: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

Balancing CRO efficiency and Nycomed oversight

CRO efficiency versus Nycomed oversight

• Rely on the CROs expertise

• Have the CRO work according to his processes

• Avoid micromanagement

• Supervise CRO (what they do and how they do it)

• Nycomed requirements• Determine QC measures in

detail

Balance

Slide 16 | B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |

Page 17: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

Contents

1. Integrating clinical trial data

2. Working with CROs

3. Current operating model in Data Integration Standards

4. Conclusion and experience

17 | B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |

Page 18: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

Contracting out data standardisation tasks

The planning process and documentation for the data standardisation task is Nycomed SOP controlled

This SOP is mandatory for the CRO

The SOP basically describes the Data Integration Plan (DIP). This is the ‘Data Management Plan’ for data standardisation tasks

18 | B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |

Page 19: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

The Data integration plan (DIP)

DIP content

General: Management plan for data standardisation

• Contacts and communication details• Agreements about CDISC standards • Details about deliverables and

responsibilities such as• Timelines• SOPs to be used • QC planning and documentation

Slide 19 | B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |

specifications

Datasets (SDTM ADaM)

Define files

QC plan and report

Integration Report

Deliverables

Page 20: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

QC and oversight on deliverables

Checks primary and secondary endpoint variables(correct application of rules as specified in SAP and ADaM specifications)

Compliance (check opendcdisc.org report after receipt of data)

Consistency(cross check of aCRF, SDTM specs , SDM, Adam specs, Adams, define files)

Completeness (QC and SAS programs, according to agreements in the DIP)

GCP compliant SAS programming according to CRO SOP.

Validation / QC documentation

Compliance checks(run opendcdisc.org checks and deliver report for SDTMs / ADaMs)

VerificationOversightValidation / QC

Slide 20

CRO Nycomed DIM Nycomed Biostatistician

| B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |20

Page 21: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

Contents

1. Integrating clinical trial data

2. Working with CROs

3. Current operating model in Data Integration Standards

4. Conclusion and experience

21 | B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |

Page 22: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

Examples of issues

Deliverable Potential issues Nycomed measures

Data Integration Plan

Relevant CRO SOPs are not available to Nycomed

As a minimum, SOP list is required as well as a trial specific QC plan

SDTM and ADaM datasets

CRO starts programming without approved specifications

Nycomed will not accept datasets

SAS programs No clear agreement on deliveryCRO claims intellectual property

Clear specification in MSA, contracts, SOPs and DIP

QC documentation Qualification documentation is not provided/available or only on general level

DIP requires proofed validation evidence per program

22 | B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |

Page 23: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

Lessons learned

• Mature CDISC standards and CDISC knowledge on both side is crucial • Sponsor standards and QC concept are available and aligned with

CRO • Clear definition of deliverables and QC concepts• Communication and partnership building – preferred provider concept

• Contracting CROs for CDISC data standardisation is more than just referring to the current SDTM/ADaM standards

23 | B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |

Page 24: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

Thank you

24 | B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |

Page 25: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

Backup slides

Page 26: The Nycomed outsourcing model – Data standardisation experience after three years

Working with CROs

CRO

Issue log, …….Issue log, ……..Issue log, ……..

SDTM aCRF Specs Data +Define.xml

Ny

co

me

d r

es

ou

rce

sC

RO

re

so

urc

es

Review +approval

Review +approval

Data Integration plan (DIP)

DIM

QCReview +approval

26 | B. Traub PhUSE 2011 |