THE N

S

NEED FOR

GR

Submitte

for

DEPA

SCHOOL O

MUHAMM

R SACRIFIC

RISHAM’S

A SOCIOL

RES

ed as a Partia

r Getting Ba

in En

AR

ARTMENT

OF TEACHE

MADIYAH

CE IN LAW

THE RACK

LOGICAL A

SEARCH PA

al Fulfillmen

achelor Degr

nglish Depar

by

RUM AGIST

A 32012029

OF ENGLI

ER TRAINI

UNIVERSI

2016

W ENFORC

KETEER (20

APPROACH

APER

nt of the Req

ree of Educa

rtment

TINA

90

ISH EDUCA

ING AND E

ITY OF SU

EMENT IN

012):

H

quirements

ation

ATION

EDUCATIO

URAKARTA

N JOHN

ON

A

ii

DECLARATION

I hereby declare that this research paper titled “The Need For Sacrifice in Law

Enforcement in John Grisham’s The Racketeer (2012): A Sociological

Approach” submitted to the Department of English Education, Muhammadiyah

University of Surakarta is a record of original work done by me under the guidance

of Mr. Dr. M. Thoyibi, MS and Mr. Titis Setyabudi, S.S. M. Hum.

The information and data shown in this research paper is authentic to the best of my

knowledge. This research paper is not submitted to any other university or

institution for the award of my degree, diploma or fellowship or published any time

before.

The Researcher

Arum Agistina

iii

ACCEPTANCE

THE NEED FOR SACRIFICE IN LAW ENFORCEMENT IN JOHN

GRISHAM’S THE RACKETEER (2012):

A SOCIOLOGICAL APPROACH

by

ARUM AGISTINA

A 32020290

Accepted by the Board of Examiner

School of Teacher Training and Education

Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta

Team of Examiner:

1. Dr. M. Thoyibi, M.S. ( )

2. Titis Setyabudi, S.S., M. Hum. ( )

3. Dr. Abdillah Nugroho M.Hum. ( )

Surakarta, April 19, 2016

Muhammadiyah University

School of Teacher Training and Education

Dean,

Prof. Dr. Harun DJoko Prayitno, M. Hum.

NIP. 1965042813199303 1001

iv

APPROVAL

THE NEED FOR SACRIFICE IN LAW ENFORCEMENT IN JOHN

GRISHAM’S THE RACKETEER (2012):

A SOCIOLOGICAL APPROACH

RESEARCH PAPER

by:

ARUM AGISTINA

A 320120290

Approved to be Examined by the Consultant Team:

First Consultant Second Consultant

(Dr. M. Thoyibi, MS.) (Titis Setyabudi, S.S. M.Hum.)

NIK. 410 NIK. 984

v

T ESTIMONY

I am as the researcher, signed on the statement below:

Name : ARUM AGISTINA

NIM : A320120290

Study Program : Department of English Education

Tittle : THE NEED FOR SACRIFICE IN LAW

ENFORCEMENT IN JOHN GRISHAM’S THE

RACKETEER (2012): A SOCIOLOGICAL

APPROACH

Herewith, I testify that in this research paper there is no plagiarism of

the previous literary work which has been raised to obtain bachelor degrees

of university. Nor there are option or masterpiece which have been written or

published by others. Except those in which the writing are refered manuscript

and mentioned in the literary review and bibliography.

Hence, later, if it is poven that there are some untrue statements in this

testimony, I will hold fully responsibility.

Surakarta, April 19, 2016

The Researcher,

Arum Agistina

A320120290

Materai Rp. 6.000,-

vi

MOTTO

♥ Power of Allah is not invincible. (The Author)

♥ Successful person is one who can rise from adversity. (The Author)

♥ You must be a healer and also must be a champion for your self. (Warrior)

♥ Your life will not be changed by fate, but be transformed by the changes you did. ( Jim Rohn)

♥ Knowing is not enough, we must apply. Willing is not enough, we must do. (Bruce Lee)

vii

DEDICATION

With all my heart I dedicated my research paper to my beloved parents,

Darwa Pamuji and Teni, who has given me the best, patience, and suport in all my

life. I am so lucky having you all in this world. My lovely younger brother Ridho

Setiawan, who never left my side and you are very special.

I dedicated this research paper and give special thanks to my best friend

Wheny Wulandari who always help and suport me. Moreover my beloved friends

in English Education Department 2012.

I also dedicated this little paper to My partner in my life. I am always

waiting for you, and I will show this research paper although I do not know who and

where you are now.

The Researcher

viii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

All praises belong to Allah SWT to his blessing and mercies given to me, I can complete my research paper entitled THE NEED FOR SACRIFICE IN LAW ENFORCEMENT IN JOHN GRISHAM’S THE RACKETEER (2012): A SOCIOLOGICAL APPROACH. I would like to acknowledge and thank to:

1. Prof. Dr. Harun Joko Prayitno, M. Hum., Dean of School of Teacher Training

and Education Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta,

2. Mauly Halwat Hikmat, Ph. D, Head of English Department on

Muhammadiyah University,

3. Dr. M. Thoyibi, MS. , the first consultant who gave me guidance, advices,

and encouragement during the writing of the research,

4. Titis Setyabudi, S.S. M. Hum., the second consultant who gave me guide,

correct, and encourage from the beginning of writing until the end of it,

5. Dra. Siti Zuhriah Aryatmi, M. Hum. as the academic consultant who has

given the researcher guidance as long as she studied in Muhammadiyah

University,

6. All lecturers of English Department, especially Drs. Dwi Hardjanto “thanks

for the motivating Sir”,

7. My beloved parents Darwa Pamuji and Teni. Thank you for the love and

sacrifice you’ve all given me,

8. My Brother Ridho Setiawan, our journey is still in the beginning, keep

fighting and praying,

9. Nindya Praja Dimas Ari Nur R.F “you are not my Praja but you are partner in

my life”,

10. My best friend Wheny Wulandari. Thank’s for the great time together. I’am

glad to have friends like you. Finally we’ve made it up,

11. My preety friends “3Dara” Deska and Cinan, my beloved friends “Dalexa”

Dea, Ai,Luthfi, Erza and Mbak Xidy, my dear friends Mbak Any, Avi and

Mala, my close friends Ida, Ariyani and Susi and my boarding mates in

Wisma Kiky Selatan Atas Wheny, Diana and Dek Ayu . Big thanks for taking

ix

care of me, so gratefull for every moment we have spent and every moment

we have share. I am so grateful for happines and thanks for being my second

family,

12. My whole friends, who cannot be mentioned one by one, thanks for

supporting and motivating me.

The researcher considers that this research paper is far from being perfect.

Therefore, suggestion and criticism are welcome and acceptance, I hope that this

research paper would be valuable for readers.

Surakarta, April 19, 2016

The Researcher,

Arum Agistina

A 320120290

x

SUMMARY

Agistina, Arum. A320120290. THE NEED FOR SACRIFICE IN LAW

ENFORCEMENT IN JOHN GRISHAM’S THE RACKETEER (2012): A

SOCIOLOGICAL APPROACH. Research Paper. Muhammadiyah Univertsity

of Surakarta. 2016

This study is about The Need for Sacrifice in Law Enforcement (2012) which

is analyzed by using Socilogical Approach. The objective of the study are to know

what problem arising in law enforcement is, to analyze who becomes a barrier in law

enforcement and to know how to people cope with the obstacle in law enforcement.

The researcher concerns about law enforcement based on Socilogical approach by

Swingewood and Laurensoon. This research belongs to qualitative research. The

primary data of this research is The Racketeer by John Grisham’s in 2012, while the

secondary data of this research are take from other source likely essay, critics,

comments, historical information, biography of John Grisham, website, internet and

other information. The researcher draws three conclution in this research. First,

problem arising in law enforcement consist of the unfair treatment, insufficient

efidence and unproffesional administration. Second, those standing against law

enforcement are corrupt lawyer, FBI agent, corrupt judge and prosecutor. Third,

coping with the obstacle consists of the sufficient evidence and applying disciplene

of legal officer.

Keywords: The Racketeer, Sacrifice, Law Enforcement, Sociological Approach

First Consultant Second Co nsultant

(Dr. M. Thoyibi, MS.) (Titis Setyabudi, S.S. M.Hum.)

NIK. 410 NIK. 984

Dean,

Prof. Dr. Harun DJoko Prayitno, M. Hum.

xi

NIP. 1965042813199303 1001 RINGKASAN

Agistina, Arum. A320120290. PENGORBANAN DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM PADA NOVEL THE RACKETEER KARYA JOHN GRISHAM (2012): PENDEKATAN SOSIOLOGIS. Skripsi. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta . 2016.

Studi ini adalah tentang The Need for Sacrifice in Law Enforcement in John Grisham’s The Racketeer (2012) yang di analisis menggunakan pendekatan Sisiologis. Tujuan studi ini adalah untuk mengetahui masalah yang timbul dalam penegakan hukum, menganalisis siapa saja penghalang dalam penegakan hukum dan cara mencegah hambatan dalam proses penegakan hukum. Keprihatinan penulis tentang penegakan hukum berdasarkan pendekatan sosiologis oleh Swingewood and Laurenson. Penelitian ini termasuk dalam penelitian kualitatif. Data primer dari penelitian ini adalah novel karya John Grisham berjudul The Racketeer yang diterbitkan pada tahun 2012, sementara data sekunder dari penelitian ini diambil dari beberapa essay, kritik, komentar, informasi sejarah, biodata John Grisham, website, internet dan beberapa informasi lain. Peneliti menarik tiga kesimpulan dalam penelitian ini. Pertama adalah masalah yang timbul dalam penegakan hukum terdiri dari perlakuan yang tidak adil, tidak cukup bukti dan administrasi yang tidak profesional. Kedua adalah yang berdiri melawan penegak hukum adalah pengacara yang tidak jujur, agen FBI, hakim yang korup, dan jaksa yang korup. Ketiga adalah cara mencegah hambatan dalam proses penegakan hukum adalah dengan bukti yang kuat dan menerapkan kedisiplinan dari masing-masing petugas hukum. Kata Kunci: The Racketeer, Pegorbanan, Penegakan Hukum, Pendekatan Sosiologis

xii

PREFACE

In order to revive to knowing about law enforcement, law enforcer must deal

with criminals. Those ways can be sacrifice in law enforcement. In this occation, the

researcher will discuss about the need for sacrifice in law enforcement. Some

problem can be arising law enforcement. Criminals also stand against law

enforcement. Although in law enforcements, they are many problems. Some people

cope with the obstacle in law enforcerment. This paper will discuss the need for

sacrifice in law enforcement by using sociological approach, a theory proposed by

Swingewood and Laurenson.

This research paper may not perfect yet, so the researcher needs any critique

and suggestions. It will help the researcher in making a better writing for next

occasion. Wish you can take your understand by reading this little paper. Happy

reading!.

The Researcher

xiii

CONTENT

TITLE ............................................................................................................................ i DECLARATION ......................................................................................................... ii ACCEPTANCE...........................................................................................................iii

APPROVAL ................................................................................................................ iv TESTIMONIAL ........................................................................................................... v MOTTO ...................................................................................................................... vi DEDICATION ........................................................................................................... vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ........................................................................................ viii SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. x PREFACE .................................................................................................................. xii CONTENT ................................................................................................................ xiii CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 1 

A.  Background of the Study ............................................................................... 1 B.  Problem Statement......................................................................................... 4 C.  Objectives of the Study ................................................................................. 5 D.  Benefit of the Study ....................................................................................... 5 E.       Paper Organization ........................................................................................ 5 

CHAPTER II. LITERATURE REVIEW ..................................................................... 6 A.  Underlying Theory ........................................................................................ 7 

1. Sociology of Literature ..................................................................................... 6 2. Type of Sociology of Literature ....................................................................... 7 3. Basic Principle of Sociology Literature ........................................................... 7 

4. Law Enforcement ............................................................................................. 8 5. Theoretical Aplication ..................................................................................... 9

B.  Previous Studies ............................................................................................. 10 CHAPTER III. RESEARCH METHOD.................................................................... 11 

A. Type of the Study .......................................................................................... 11 B. Type of the Data and the Data Source...........................................................11 C. Technique of the Data Collection .................................................................. 12 D. Technique of the Data Analysis .................................................................... 13 

CHAPTER IV. RESULT OF THE RESEARCH AND DISCUSSION .................... 14 A.  RESULT (MAIN FINDING) ......................................................................... 14 

1. Problem Arising in Law Enforcement ........................................................... 14 

xiv

a. The Unfair Treatment ..................................................................................... 14 b. Insufficient Evidence ..................................................................................... 17 c. Unprofessional Administration.......................................................................18 2. Those Standing Against Law Enforcement....................................................20 a. Corrupt Lawyer and FBI Agent......................................................................20 b. Corrupt Judges and Prosecutor.......................................................................22 3. Coping with the Obstacle ............................................................................... 24 a. Sufficient Evidence ......................................................................................... 24 b. Applying Discipline of Each Legal Officer ...................................................25 

B.DISCUSSION.........................................................................................................27

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION ...................................................................................30 A. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………….31 B. Suggestion..........................................................................................................32 C. Pedagogical Implication.....................................................................................32

BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………...………………33 VIRTUAL REFERENCE…………………………………………………….……..35