GROUP 4

Gerda Gekai 2012 1250 1147Mifta Ulfi F 2012 1250 1166Fransina Elisabeth Rumfaan 2012 1250 1172

THE POST METHOD ERA

Multiple

Intelligences

The lexical

approach

The natural

approach

Multiple Intelligences

Multiple intelligences refers to a learner-based philosophy that characterizes human intelligence as

having multiple dimensions that must be acknowledged and developed in education.

MI is based on the work of Howard Gardner of the Harvard Graduate School of Education.

MI thus belong to a group of instructional perspectives that focus on differences between

learner an the need to recognize learner differences in teaching

Multiple Intelligences

LinguisticLigical/

Mathematcal

Spatial

Musical

Bodily/Kinesthetic

Interpersonal

Intrapersonal

Naturalist

Approach: Theory of language and language learning

MI theory was originally proposed by Gardner (1993) as a contribution to cognitive science. Fairly early on, it was interpreted by some general educators, such as Armstrong (1994), as a framework for rethinking school educations.

In the Gardner view, there exists cluster of mental abilities that are separate but equal and that share the pinnacle at the top of the hierarchy called intelligence – thus, the eight Multiple Intelligences that Gardner has described.

Design: Objective, syllabus, learning activities, roles of learners, teachers and materials

There are no goals stated for MI instruction in linguistic terms.Such a learner is both better empowered and more fulfilled than a learner in traditional classrooms. A more goal – directed learner and happier person is held to be a likely candidate for being a better second language learner and user.Also, there is no syllabus as such, either prescribed or recommended, in respect to MI – based language teaching.

Lazear has been proposed the four stage as a type of syllabus:

Stage 1: awaken the Intelligence

Stage 2: amplify the intelligence.

Stage 3: teach with/for the Intelligence

Stage 4: transfer of

the Intelligence

Nicholson-Nelson (1998-73) describes how MI can be used to individualize learning through project work. She

lists five types of projects:

1. Multiple intelligences projects

2. Curriculum-based projects

3. Thematic-based projects

4. Resource-based projects

5. Student-choice projects

The following list summarizes several of the alternative views as to how the MI model can

be used to serve the needs of language learners within a classroom setting:

Play to strength

Variety is the spice

Pick a tool to suit the job

All sizes fit one

Me and my people

The lexical approach

A lexical approach in language teaching refers to one derived from the belief that the building blocks of language learning and communication are not grammar, functions, notions, or some other unit of planning and teaching but lexis, that is, words and word combinations.

The lexical approach

A lexical approach in language teaching refers to one derived from the belief that the building blocks of language learning and communication are not grammar, functions, notions, or some other unit of planning and teaching but lexis, that is, words and word combinations.

BACKGROUND

It is a language teaching method published by Michael Lewis in 1993.

Giving importance the insight of the language lexicon.

Lexis is the basis of language.

The lexical approach concentrates on developing learners proficiency with lexis, or words and word combinations.

Lexis play’s the central role.

Alternative approach to traditional grammatical approach.

Approach : Theory of language and learning

The building blocks of language learning and communication are not grammar, function or some of unit planning but teaching lexis with the help of chunks and collocation.

Procedure

Procedural sequences for lexically based language teaching vary depending on which of the four types of materials and activities outlined in the preceding section are employed.

Conclusion

The status of lexis in language teaching has been considerably enhanced by developments in lexical and linguistic theory, by work in corpus analysis, and by recognition of the role of multiword units in language learning and communication.

NATURAL APPROACHI. BagroundThe natural approach was originally created in 1977 by Tracy Terrell, a Spanish teacher in California. At the same time, he joined force with StephenKrashen, an applied linguist at University of Southern California. The principles and practices of this new approach have been publish in their book “The Natural Approach in 1983. Krashen and Terrell see communication as the primary function of the language, thus, this approach focuses on teaching communicative abilities. This approach is based on the use of language in communicative situations without recourse to the native language and without reference to grammatical analysis, drill or any particular grammar theory.

II. THEORY OF LANGUAGEThe theory of learning in the Natural Approach is divided into several sections, as follows: ● Krashen and Terrell see communication as the primary function of language ● Language is viewed as a vehicle for communicating meaning and mesage● The focus on meanging not form

III. THEORY OF LEARNING

The theory of learning in the Natural Approach is divided into several sections, as follows:

● THE ACQUISITION / LEARNING HYPOTHESIS

The acquisition / learning hypothesis claims that there are two distinctive ways of developing competence in a second or foreign language, that is :1.Acquisition 2. Learning :

● THE MONITOR HYPOTHESIS The monitor hypothesis claims that we may call upon learned knowledge to correct ourselves when we communicate, but that conscious learning this function. Three conditions limit the successful use of the monitor: 1.Time : There must be sufficient time for a learner to choose and apply a learned rule. 2.Focus on form : The language user must be focused on correctness or on the form output. 3.Knowledge of rules : The performer must be know the rule.

● THE NATURAL ORDER HYPOTESIS

This hypothesis considers that there are similarities between the order of acquisition of grammatical structures learned first language by learning a second language learning.

● THE INPUT HYPOTHESIS This hypothesis explains that the language can be controlled via the input (input) in the form of discourse or listening activities in accordance with what is understood by the child.Krashen and Terrell explains the four main issues of this input hypothesis, namely:1. This hypothesis is consistent with the acquisition, not learning.2. People learn a language by understanding input slightly exceeded3. The ability to speak fluently can not be studied directly

● THE AFFECTIVE FILTER HYPOTHESIS

Effective filter hypothesis explains that language acquisition can be influenced by the attitude or emotional child.This hypothesis appears based penellitian second language acquisition, which identifies three kinds of effective variables or attitudes related to second language acquisition.1. Motivation. Learners with high motivation

generally do better. 2. . Self-confidence. Learners with self-confidence

and a good self-image tend to be more successful. 3. Anxiety. Low personal anxiety and low classroom anxiety are more con ducive to second language acquisition..

● THE AFFECTIVE FILTER HYPOTHESIS

Effective filter hypothesis explains that language acquisition can be influenced by the attitude or emotional child.This hypothesis appears based penellitian second language acquisition, which identifies three kinds of effective variables or attitudes related to second language acquisition.1. Motivation. Learners with high motivation

generally do better. 2. . Self-confidence. Learners with self-confidence

and a good self-image tend to be more successful. 3. Anxiety. Low personal anxiety and low classroom anxiety are more con ducive to second language acquisition..

● The SyllabusTerrell and Krashen put forward two arguments in designing learning in Natural Approach:

1. They list some typical goals for language courses and suggest which of these goals are the ones at which the Natural Approach aims. 1. Basic personal communication skills: oral (e.g., listening to announce ments in public places) 2. Basic personal communication skills: written (e.g., reading and writing personal letters) 3. Academic learning skills: oral (e.g., listening to a lecture) 4. Academic learning skills: written (e.g., taking notes in class) 2. The purpose of a language course will vary according to the needs of the students and their particular interests.

● Learner RolesLearners have four kinds of responsibilities in the Natural Approach classroom: 1. Provide information about their specific goals so that acquisition activities can focus on the topics and situations most relevant to their needs. 2. Take an active role in ensuring comprehensible input. They should learn and use conversational management techniques to regulate input. 3. Decide when to start producing speech and when to upgrade it. 4. Where learning exercises (i.e., grammar study) are to be a part of the pro gram, decide with the teacher the relative amount of time to be devoted to them and perhaps even complete and correct them independently.

● Teacher RolesTeachers have an important role in three classes:- Teachers are the main source in the provision of inputs to the students in the target language in a simple form.- The teacher creates a classroom atmosphere that is comfortable and attractive.- Teachers should select and combine various kinds of learning activities in the classroom.- Teachers should choose and the condition of various kinds in the classroom.

● Conclusion▪ The Natural Approach rejects the formal grammatical organization of language to teach.▪ It emphasizes comprehensible and meaningful practice activities, rather that production of grammatically perfect utterances and sentences.