The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing...

20
The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing September 19, 2007

Transcript of The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing...

Page 1: The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing September 19, 2007.

The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force

Joint House and Senate Education Committee

BriefingSeptember 19, 2007

Page 2: The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing September 19, 2007.

www.ie2.org

Page 3: The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing September 19, 2007.

IE² - The Right Formula

StateAppropriation

AllocationMethodology

•Cost Formula• Cost Model

•Set % of Budget

• Wealth Issue• Property Tax• Income

Partnership

• Performance Standards and Goals• Strategic Plans• Contracts

Page 4: The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing September 19, 2007.

IE² - The Right Formula

StateAppropriation

AllocationMethodology

•Cost Formula• Cost Model

•Set % of Budget

• Wealth Issue• Property Tax• Income

Partnership

• Performance Standards and Goals• Strategic Plans• Contracts

Alignment of InterestAlignment of Interest

Page 5: The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing September 19, 2007.

IE² - The Right Formula

StateAppropriation

AllocationMethodology

•Cost Formula• Cost Model

•Set % of Budget

• Wealth Issue• Property Tax• Income

Partnership

• Performance Standards and Goals• Strategic Plans• Contracts

Page 6: The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing September 19, 2007.

IE² Cost Model Methodology

Best Practice

Elementary

General LedgerCost Model

Best Practice

High

Best Practice Middle

BestPractices

Strategic Multiples

Strategic Requirements

$/Student

$/Student

$/Student

$/Student

$/Student+

StrategicMultiples

Cost Components• Direct• Indirect• G&A

Return On Investment (ROI)•Achievement•Cost

Page 7: The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing September 19, 2007.

Best Practice Elementary • 600 students per school.• 100 students per grade

level.• Grade levels include K-5.• One principal per school.• One assistant Principal.• One secretary.• One academic/literacy

coach.• One Art teacher.• One music teacher.• One half-time medical

professional.

• One media specialist.• On-site staff professional

development.• One Parent Resource

Center, staffed with a half-time person.

• One half-time foreign language teacher.

• One physical education / health teacher

• One Guidance Counselor• Technology: Technology

for each teacher, and two technology labs.

Page 8: The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing September 19, 2007.

AcademicAcademicRequirementsRequirements Elem. $6,220Elem. $6,220

Strategic Multiples

OperationOperation& &

MaintenanceMaintenance$600$600 ($4.93/sq. ft.)($4.93/sq. ft.)

TransportationTransportation$151 ($3.04/mile)$151 ($3.04/mile)

OutsideOutsideServicesServices

CostCostModelModel

Cost Model Process

Page 9: The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing September 19, 2007.

Fiscal Year 2007 Education as % of Total State Budget

Board of Regents$ 1,917,240,948

10.3 %

Department of Education $ 7,189,516,840

38.5 %

Other $ 9,211,018,206

49.4 %

Technical and Adult Education

$ 336,788,0641.8 %

Page 10: The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing September 19, 2007.

IE² - The Right Formula

StateAppropriation

AllocationMethodology

•Cost Formula• Cost Model

•Set % of Budget

•Wealth Issue• Property Tax• Income

Partnership

• Performance Standards and Goals• Strategic Plans• Contracts

Page 11: The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing September 19, 2007.

IE² - The Right Formula

StateAppropriation

AllocationMethodology

•Cost Formula• Cost Model

•Set % of Budget

• Wealth Issue• Property Tax• Income

Partnership

•Performance Standards and Goals•Strategic Plans•Contracts

Page 12: The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing September 19, 2007.

IE² Partnership Model

Students

Students

State

Schools

Students

Students

Schools

Local System

Page 13: The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing September 19, 2007.

IE² Partnership

ComplianceCompliance

& Performance

Performance

• Prescriptive Task• Prescriptive Way• Low Flexibility• No Accountability• No Consequences

• Prescriptive Task• Prescriptive Way• Low Flexibility• Low Accountability• Some Consequences

• Meet Standard• High Flexibility• High Accountability• Significant Consequences (Sanctions & Rewards)No Child Left Behind

A New Partnership (IE²)

Page 14: The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing September 19, 2007.

IE²Flexibility vs. Accountability

High

High

Low

Low

FlexibilityA

ccou

nta

bilit

y

Current

Future

Page 15: The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing September 19, 2007.

Schools – Change Mechanism

Loca

l Boa

rds

/ Su

perint

ende

nts.

– C

hang

e Age

nts Superinten

dents / Principals– Change Leader

Local School Systems

StudentAchievement

Change Process Structure

State Sets Performance

Standards and Evaluation Criteria

…Then Hold SystemsAccountableLocal

Community

Page 16: The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing September 19, 2007.

IE² Partnership Model – Confluence of Interest

Students

Students

State

Schools

Students

Students

Schools

Local System

Strategic Plan

Strategic Plan

Strategic Plan

Strategic Plan

Page 17: The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing September 19, 2007.

District Size

SizeNumber of Systems

% Total Systems

Total Students

% Total Students

Total 184   1,629,157  

50,001 + 6 3 547,738 34

25,001 - 50,000

9 5 277,528 17

10,001 - 25,000

21 11 322,533 20

5,001 - 10,000

28 15 195,261 12

3,001 - 5,000

40 22 153,010 9

Under 3,000

80 43 133,087 8

Page 18: The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing September 19, 2007.

IE² Partnership

Model

Contract Model“QBE”

State

LocalSystem’sStrategic

Plan

LocalSystem’sStrategic

Plan

LocalSystem’sStrategic

Plan

LocalSystem’sStrategic

Plan

LocalSystem’sStrategic

Plan

LocalSystem’sStrategic

Plan

Contract Model

“C”

Contract Model“B”

Contract Model“A”

Contract Model

“Charter”

Page 19: The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing September 19, 2007.

Partnership Contract ModelsAccountability/Performance/Flexibility Concept

High Accountability for Georgia’s Schools:Non-Negotiable

Level of Flexibility Based on Contract Model Chosen and Results Achieved/Performance

Low Flexibility

•QBE Default

High Flexibility

•Charter• Contract B • Contract C• Contract A

Page 20: The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force Joint House and Senate Education Committee Briefing September 19, 2007.

Partnership Contract ModelsAccountability/Performance/Flexibility Concept

QBE Default

Achievement Measures:• AYP • Graduation Rate• Promotion Rate• EOCT• SAT• AP• Percent exceeding grade-level performance

on state assessments• Writing Assessments• Local system initiatives• ???

Flexibility Based on Contract M

odel & Performance

Contract A Contract CContract B Charter