The Future of Human Mobility and its Impacts on Aviation 2020-2025, Embraer Corporation, Sao Jose...
-
Upload
cornelius-murphy -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of The Future of Human Mobility and its Impacts on Aviation 2020-2025, Embraer Corporation, Sao Jose...
The Future of Human Mobility and its Impacts on The Future of Human Mobility and its Impacts on Aviation 2020-2025, Embraer Corporation, Sao Jose dos Aviation 2020-2025, Embraer Corporation, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil, May 13-15 2009Campos, Brazil, May 13-15 2009
The Future of Transportation: The Future of Transportation: Driving Forces for the Airline Driving Forces for the Airline Industry (2020-25)Industry (2020-25)
Jean-Paul RodrigueAssociate ProfessorDept. of Global Studies & GeographyHofstra UniversityNew York, USA
The Future of Mobility: The Views of a Transport The Future of Mobility: The Views of a Transport GeographerGeographer
■ Socioeconomic forces• Aggregate demand.• Preferences.
■ Technological forces• Performance.• Input costs.
■ Regulatory forces• Competition.• Operations.
Locations (Nodes)
Locations (Nodes) In
tera
ctio
ns (F
lows)
Inte
ract
ions
(Flo
ws)
InfrastructuresInfrastructures
PassengersPassengers
FreightFreight InformationInformation
An Accessible World… With Limited Expected An Accessible World… With Limited Expected ChangesChanges
Source: Nelson (2008)
ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS CYCLESECONOMIC AND BUSINESS CYCLES
Long term trends linked with paradigms shifts and incremental changes.How the current phase of mal-investment could unfold.
Cumulative Modal Contribution to Economic Cumulative Modal Contribution to Economic OpportunitiesOpportunities
HorsesMaritime shipping
Canal shipping
Railways
Roads Air
Telecommunications
1750 1775 1800 1825 1850 1875 1900 1925 1950 1975 2000 2025 2050
Econ
om
ic O
pp
ort
un
itie
s
Industrial RevolutionIndustrial Revolution Mass ProductionMass Production GlobalizationGlobalization
Paradigm Shifts and Incremental ChangesParadigm Shifts and Incremental Changes
■ Revolutionary changes• Completely new
technology.• Create new markets and
growth opportunities.• Often marks the
obsolescence of an existing technology:
• Modal shift.• Can paradigm shifts be
predicted?
■ Incremental changes• Improvement of existing
technology and operations.
• Leads to increases in productivity:
• More capacity.• Lower costs.• Better performance.
• Possible to extrapolate.
Past Trends and Uncertain FuturePast Trends and Uncertain Future
■ Cyclic character of transport innovations• Innovations lead to a wave of development.
• A cycles starts with a revolution and evolves incrementally.• Introduction:
• Private entrepreneurs and innovators.• Growth:
• Fast adoption; Often involves a “paradigm shift” event.• Maturity:
• Maximal spatial coverage.• Government involvement (investment, regulations, etc.)
• Rationalization/obsolescence:• Diminishing returns (Segment or system-wide).• Possibility of nationalization.• A mix of regulations (protect public interests) and deregulations
(increase productivity).
Technology “Hype” CycleTechnology “Hype” Cycle
Visibility
Inflated expectations
Abandonment
Delusion
Introduction
Productivity peak
Learning curve
Utility
Hype Phase Realization Phase
Growth of the US Transport System, 19Growth of the US Transport System, 19thth – 21 – 21stst CenturyCentury
CanalsCanals
RailRail
RoadsRoadsAirAir
MaglevMaglev
1836
1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 20500%
1%
2%
3%
4%
1891 1946 2001
Δt= 30 years
Δt= 55 years Δt= 65 years Δt= 70 years
1825
18691913 1969
1836
1825 Paradigm shift
Peak year
Blowing Bubbles: From Technology to CommoditiesBlowing Bubbles: From Technology to Commodities
Tech / Stock Bubble Housing BubbleCommodities / Trade
Bubble
FORECASTING: A LESSON IN FORECASTING: A LESSON IN HUMILITY… AND FUTILITYHUMILITY… AND FUTILITY
Failure and potential misallocations.Linear thinking versus economic, social and technological forces.
“We have two classes of forecasters: Those who don't know . . . and those who don't know they don't know.”John Kenneth Galbraith
Flying Car Concept, 1951Flying Car Concept, 1951
Flying Car (Spinner) in Science Fiction (Blade Flying Car (Spinner) in Science Fiction (Blade Runner, 1982)Runner, 1982)
World Air Travel and World Air Freight Carried, 1950-World Air Travel and World Air Freight Carried, 1950-2007; Are We at an Inflexion Point?2007; Are We at an Inflexion Point?
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
Bill
ion
s o
f to
ns-
km
Bill
ion
s o
f pa
sse
ng
ers
-km
Passengers
Freight
“Monkey Curve”
Recession and regionalization
PEAK OIL OR PEAK MOBILITY?PEAK OIL OR PEAK MOBILITY?
Are energy issues an overstatement?Secular inflationary cycle in the price of energy and commoditiesPotential for demand destruction
The Peak Oil Debate: A “Normal” AssumptionThe Peak Oil Debate: A “Normal” Assumption
World Annual Oil Production (1900-2007) and Peak Oil (2010)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100
Bill
ions
of b
arre
ls
2010 Peak
Actual
West Texas Intermediate, Monthly Nominal Spot Oil West Texas Intermediate, Monthly Nominal Spot Oil Price (1970-2009) Price (1970-2009)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Jan-
70Ja
n-71
Jan-
72Ja
n-73
Jan-
74Ja
n-75
Jan-
76Ja
n-77
Jan-
78Ja
n-79
Jan-
80Ja
n-81
Jan-
82Ja
n-83
Jan-
84Ja
n-85
Jan-
86Ja
n-87
Jan-
88Ja
n-89
Jan-
90Ja
n-91
Jan-
92Ja
n-93
Jan-
94Ja
n-95
Jan-
96Ja
n-97
Jan-
98Ja
n-99
Jan-
00Ja
n-01
Jan-
02Ja
n-03
Jan-
04Ja
n-05
Jan-
06Ja
n-07
Jan-
08Ja
n-09
First Oil Shock
Second Oil Shock
Third Oil Shock
A B C
21
D
Major Oil Price FluctuationsMajor Oil Price Fluctuations
Price Change Event Price Change Time Frame Cause Nominal Price Change
First Oil Shock October 1973 to March 1974 Yom Kippur War / OPEC oil embargo
From $4.31 to $10.11 (+134.5%)
Second Oil Shock April 1979 to July 1980 Iranian revolution (1978) / Iran-Iraq war (1980)
From $15.85 to $39.50 (+149.2%)
Oil counter shock (A) November 1985 to July 1986 OPEC oversupply / Lower demand
From $30.81 to $11.57 (-62.4%)
First Gulf War (1) July 1990 to November 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait From $18.63 to $32.30 (+73.4%)
Asian Financial Crisis (B) January 1997 to August 1998
Debt defaults / Non-USD currency devaluations / Reduced demand
From $25.17 to $14.08 (-44.1%)
"Asian Demand Contagion" (2)
January 1999 to September 2000
Rising demand / OPEC output cutbacks
From $11.28 to $33.88 (+200.3%)
"September 11 Effect" (C)
August 2001 to December 2001
Oversupply / American recession
From $27.47 to $19.33 (-29.6%)
Third Oil Shock December 2003 to June 2008
Peak oil / Rising demand / Monetary debasement / Speculation
From $32.15 to $133.95 (+316.6%)
Financial Crisis of 2008 (D) July to December 2008
Collapse of asset bubbles / Demand destruction / Global recession
From $133.95 to $41.02 (-69.4%; Dec 2008)
Air Transportation Has Some Room for SubstitutionAir Transportation Has Some Room for Substitution
Trend in Aircraft Fuel Efficiency (Fuel burned per Seat)
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005
Year of Introduction
% o
f Bas
e (C
omet
4)
Strategies Used by Airlines to Save FuelStrategies Used by Airlines to Save Fuel
Dimension Strategy
Fleet Retiring less fuel efficient aircrafts (e.g. DC-9, DC10, MD-80).Switching to more fuel efficient aircrafts (e.g. A330, A319).
Operations Less engine idle at gates (electrical systems).Lower flying speed (-5%).More frequent plane and engine washing.
On board Lighter seats.Removal of seat-pocket documents (e.g. magazines).Less water in bathrooms.Lighter service carts.
Passengers Weight restrictions for luggage.Surcharges for first or second check-in luggage.Passengers weight surcharges (?)
Principle of “Demand Destruction”Principle of “Demand Destruction”
PricePrice
QuantityQuantity
P1
ΔP
P2
Q1
ΔQ
Q2
Annual Vehicle-Miles Traveled in the United States Annual Vehicle-Miles Traveled in the United States and Year-over-Year Changes, 1971-2009and Year-over-Year Changes, 1971-2009
Recession
End of the motorization cycleSlow down of suburbanizationAging of the population
Population 60+, 1950-2005, With Projections to 2050Population 60+, 1950-2005, With Projections to 2050
NETWORK STRUCTURENETWORK STRUCTURE
Regionalism or globalism?Modal shiftThinking “outside the aircraft”
World’s Major Gateway Systems, 2006World’s Major Gateway Systems, 2006
World Cities, Hubs of RegionalizationWorld Cities, Hubs of Regionalization
Characteristics of Major Air Travel Markets: Characteristics of Major Air Travel Markets: Expected ChangesExpected Changes
United States Europe Pacific Asia
Deregulation started in 1978 Deregulation started in 1997 ▲Regulated markets with government ownership
Low population density and dispersed urban centers
High population density and concentrated urban centers
Dispersion of urban centers but high regional concentrations
Relatively open air spaces and airports
Congested air spaces and airports
▲Congested gateway airports underutilized regional airports
▼Rail minor competitor; Car compete for short distances
High speed rail is a direct competitor; Cars compete for short distances
Less competition from other transportation modes (except Japan, Korea and Taiwan)
Intense competition between carriers (No loyalty; pricing and frequent flyers)
▲Emerging competition between carriers
▲Competition between carriers in its infancy
▼Limited income growth and limited leisure time
▼Limited income growth and more leisure time
▲Growing income levels
Deregulation Favored Regionalization: Reemergence Deregulation Favored Regionalization: Reemergence of more Point-to-Point Servicesof more Point-to-Point Services
Before Deregulation
After Deregulation
Hub
Hub
Travel Times before and after the Introduction of a Travel Times before and after the Introduction of a High Speed Train Service (hours)High Speed Train Service (hours)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Firenze - Rome
Hannover - Wurzburg
Berlin - Hannover
Paris - Bruxelles
London - Paris
Madrid - Seville
Paris - Marseille
Tokyo - Osaka
Seoul - Busan
Taipei - Kaohsiung
After
Before
Low-Cost Carriers are a Wild CardLow-Cost Carriers are a Wild Card
On-board operations
Optimum use of seating space.Minimal crew.Limited and paying cabin service.
Aircraft operations
Few (often one) types of aircraft used to minimize maintenance costs.Stair boarding instead of air bridges.Maximal usage of runway length (take-off thrust and braking on landing).Fast turn around to maximize aircraft use.No freight being carried.
Service network
Point-to-point services.Destinations commonly of less than two hours apart.Usage of secondary airports (lower gate rates).
Booking Online booking to minimize transaction costs.No travel agent commissions.
Thinking “outside the aircraft”: Air Travel as an Thinking “outside the aircraft”: Air Travel as an Intermodal Transport ChainIntermodal Transport Chain
Terminal / Plane Interactions Airport / City Interactions
Checking in Access to public transit systems (the location paradox)
Security Access to surface freight systems
Gate access Parking facilities
Boarding “Aeotropolis”
McNamara Terminal, DetroitMcNamara Terminal, Detroit
Maglev Exiting Pudong Airport, ShanghaiMaglev Exiting Pudong Airport, Shanghai
Aeotropolis DevelopmentsAeotropolis Developments
Dubai
SeoulDenver Beijing
Bangkok
Detroit
MemphisOntario Shanghai
Hong KongGuangzhou
Singapore
Amsterdam
Kuala Lumpur
Belo Horizonte
Dallas-Ft. Worth
Rudimentary (3)
Planned (3)
In development (8)
Existing (2)
Diffusion of a Pandemic Through a Global Diffusion of a Pandemic Through a Global Transportation NetworkTransportation Network
A - Emergence B - Translocation
C - Diffusion D - Pandemic